Azobenzene Modified Imidacloprid Derivatives as Photoswitchable Insecticides: Steering Molecular Activity in a Controllable Manner

Article metrics

Abstract

Incorporating the photoisomerizable azobenzene into imidacloprid produced a photoswitchable insecticidal molecule as the first neonicotinoid example of remote control insecticide performance with spatiotemporal resolution. The designed photoswitchable insecticides showed distinguishable activity against Musca both in vivo and in vitro upon irradiation. Molecular docking study further suggested the binding difference of the two photoisomers. The generation of these photomediated insecticides provides novel insight into the insecticidal activity facilitating further investigation on the functions of insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and opens a novel way to control and study insect behavior on insecticide poisoning using light.

Introduction

Insecticides are widely used in agriculture, industry, horticulture and human buildings, guaranteeing productivity abundance as well as making our lives easier and more enjoyable1,2. They are designed to regulate insect behaviors causing them death, dysfunction or moving away3,4. Normally, the activity of an insecticide cannot be controlled intentionally once administrated, making it difficult to elucidate the location and timing of the activity. This uncontrollable property leads to many undesirable secondary effects after application, such as occurrence of resistance5, toxic to beneficial wildlife6,7, food and environmental contamination8,9. Thus, how to precisely manipulate the activity of an insecticide molecule is a subject of considerable importance for its safe application. The spatiotemporal control of activity will contribute to further understandings of pesticide performance, action mechanism and toxicology profiles and provide better pesticide-environment interactions.

The spatiotemporal regulation of chemical10 or biological events11,12 using artificial molecular photoswitches has been successfully achieved in many systems such as catalyst13,14,15, peptides16,17, cells18, receptors19,20,21,22,23, ion channel24,25,26,27,28, nucleic acid29 and in living organism30,31,32. Recently, this methodology was applied to the pharmaceutical chemistry generating the photo-controllable molecules which can be activated or deactivated upon irradiation33,34,35,36,37,38. Such photo-responsive bioactive molecules have the merits such as antiresistance, high specificity and low side effect39. The efforts in this direction led to a new terminology called photopharmacology39.

One elegant way to address the above regulation is to blend a photoisomerizable moiety and a pharmacophore together. The most commonly-used examples take advantage of azobenzene (AB) which can be switched between extended trans form and compact cis one by irradiation of different wavelength of light. Ilumination with ultraviolet (UV) at wavelength (around 360 nm) leads to trans-to-cis isomerization and visible light irradiation switches it back40. The two isomers differ greatly in geometry, dipole moment and end-to-end distance and the isomerization occurs with high quantum yields for both transitions40,41.

However, in the pesticide arena, this technique has never been elaborate for configurational manipulation of pesticide properties. Although the sunlight activation of oxime ether pyrethroids was observed previously, the process is not utilized for further study42. As an entry to seeking photoswitchable insecticide, the present investigation describes the azobenzene-modified imidacloprid (AMI) analogues, which enable rapid regulation of activity by light and may lead to the development of novel insecticides driven by easily available physical stimuli.

Results and Discussion

Moelcular Design

When an active molecule is structurally coupled with the AB, its ability to interact with the target protein might be interfered with by trans-cis isomerization39. Thus, the rationale behind our molecular design involved the fusion of AB to an insecticidal molecule. The design of AMIs was shown in Fig. 1. Our photoswitchable insecticides stemmed from the currently major insecticide, imidacloprid (IMI)43. IMI has outstanding efficacy to piercing-sucking insects as an selective insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChRs) agonist44. It is widely used as a parent compound for neonicotinoids discovery due to the maintenance of potency upon a variety of chemical modifications45. Three approaches, replacing the chloropyridinyl with AB, introducing AB into imidazolidine and combining two IMI molecules together, were adopted here for generating the AMIs hoping that the mediation of insecticidal activity with light would be addressed by the introduction of photoswitchable AB.

Figure 1
figure1

Photoswitchable insecticide design for optical control of activity.

Synthesis

Our photoswitchable chemicals consisted of two primary structural features: an AB motif and an IMI pharmacophore. Generally, six main methods are usually employed for constructing azobenzene framework: oxidation of aromatic amines, reduction of nitro compounds, coupling of arylamines with nitroso compounds, diazo-coupling via diazonium, oxidation of hydrazo derivatives and reduction of azoxybenzene41. According to the structure features of the target compounds, different multistep syntheses were used. Monovalent AMI-1 ~ AMI-4 were prepared starting from m/p-methylaniline via sequential Mills reaction, bromination with NBS and final coupling with IMI analogues (Fig. 2A). During radical bromination, the reaction time and the reactant ratio must be strictly controlled; otherwise unfavorable dibromo- and tribromo-byproducts would form leading to the difficulty of purification. Unfortunately, attempts to synthesize the AMI-5 and AMI-6 using a similar method were unsuccessful because the cyclic 2-phenyl-2H-indazole would generate during bromination instead of the monobromide product. Thus, we adopted an alternative route which featured introducing IMI analogues first and AB last (Fig. 2B). Divalent AMI-7 ~ AMI-10 were obained by a three-step method. Symmetric azobenzenes were prepared by a modified method via oxidation of m/p-toluidine and radical bromination. Then IMI analogues were fused to them affording the target compounds (Fig. 2C).

Figure 2
figure2

Synthetic route for AMI-1–AMI-10.

Photoisomerization

The photoswitchable behaviors of AMIs at room temperature were characterized by UV/Vis absorption, NMR spectroscopy and HPLC studies. A solution of AMI-10 in DMSO exhibited a typical absorption spectrum for AB derivatives. Upon irradiation with ultraviolet (365 nm), a gradual intensity decrease at 327 nm and increase at 410–500 nm was detected corresponding to the π–π* and n–π* transition band, respectively (Fig. 3B). The reverse spectral changes were observed upon irradiation at 436 nm (data not shown). All the other compounds gave the similar spectral changes when illuminated with light. The proportions of E/Z isomer at the photostationary states before and after irradiation were determined by HPLC analysis (Table 1). Most of the compounds could produced more than 80% cis isomers upon irradiation. No photo bleaching or photo-oxidation could be observed after multiple cycles of photoisomerization or constant irradiation at 365 nm for 1 h (Fig. 3C). Thermal cis-trans isomerization half-lives of AMI are presented in Table 1. All the compounds had slow thermal isomerization at 25 °C (t1/2 > 100 h) indicating that the cis isomer was stable in the dark for the duration of biological process. The photoisomerization of AMI-10 was further identified by 1H NMR spectroscopy with the notable appearance of two double peaks at δ 7.25 and 6.85, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S1 online).

Table 1 Maximum absorbance wavelength (λmax, nm), ratio of trans and cis isomers and the rate of thermal relaxation of AMIs.
Figure 3
figure3

Photochemical properties of AMI-10.

(A) Trans and cis geometrical structure and isomerization process of AMI-10. (B) UV-Vis absorbance of AMI-10 under UV irradiation at 365 nm at varying reaction times (1–8 min). (C) Cycling of the conversion of AMI-10 by irradiation alternately with UV and visible light (430 nm).

Insecticidal Activity in Vivo

The ability of azobenzene to regulate insecticidal activities remains unexplored. To better understand the activity changes induced by light, the efficacy before and after irradiation was tested by leaf-dip method for cowpea aphid (Aphis craccivora) and intrathoracic injection against house fly (Musca domestica)46,47. Against cowpea aphid, all the isomers had low activity and no significant difference was observed between two photo isomers (Supplementary Table S1 online). We attribute this observation to the poor solubility at the testing concentrations.

Thus, injection of chemicals into house fly was employed to evaluate their intrinsic activity (Table 2). House fly is a most commonly used indicator for both in vitro and in vivo insecticidal activity48. Replacement of chloropyridinyl in IMI with AB leads to a deleterious effect on in vivo activity to house fly as exemplified by analogues AMI-1, 2 and 5 with LD50 values of more than 10 μg/g irrespective of irradiation or not. AMI-3 and 4 with AB attachment to IMI at para- and meta- position, respectively, showed enhanced activity and a slight difference was also realized before and after irradiation. This activity improvement also proved the importance of chloropyridinyl substituent in activity which has been well addressed before43. The divalent compounds AMI-7AMI-10 showed relatively higher insecticidal potency. AMI-7 and AMI-8 exhibited increased and decreased activity, respectively, upon irradiation. No obvious difference was observed between the trans and cis form of AMI-9. AMI-10 was the most effective compound with LD50 value of 2.8 μg/g before irradiation and 0.5 μg/g after irradiation, the difference being 5-fold, indicating that the activity can be reversibly adjusted by light. Azobenzene was previously used as an insecticide, but no significant poisoning sign was detected here under the tested concentrations.

Table 2 Insecticidal activity of AMIs against house fly (Musca domestica) and binding affinity (IC50) to house fly nAChR.

nAChR Binding in Vitro

Tritium labeled nitromethylene analogue of IMI ([3H]NMI) is a unique reporter for monitoring nAChR binding not only in vitro but also in vivo due to its extremely high binding potency48. Here, the in vitro interaction of AMIs with house fly brain nAChR was measured by competitive inhibition of [3H]NMI binding (Table 2). Photoisomers of AMI-1, 2, 5 and 6 had very poor ability to displacing [3H]NMI binding (IC50 > 2000 nM) leading to difficulty for difference judgement. Slight differences were observed for AMI-3 and 8 between two isomers, although the activity was very low. A 4-fold difference was achieved on AMI-4 and 10 upon photoirradiation. Compounds AMI-9 or AMI-10 have some similarities with the bis-IMI derivatives disclosed by Kagabu et al.49,50,51. Such bis-IMI’s activity was significantly influenced by the spacer types and distance. Among various spacers investigated, the heptamethylene or furan-2,5-dimethylene was the optimal bridge49,50,51. The N-PhN=NPh-N lengths for trans and cis isomers of AMI-9 or AMI-10 are about 12.29 Ǻ and 6.82 Ǻ or 12.59 Ǻ and 8.14 Ǻ, respectively. While for the bis-IMI linked by heptamethylene, the distance is 9.96 Ǻ, close to that of cis-AMI-10. The shorter or longer distance of the linker may decrease the activity. Furthermore, the lack of heteroatom in the AB linker which is important for stabilizing the interaction with the receptor further attenuated the activity50.

nAChR Docking

In an effort to understand the structure-activity difference in the receptor level, computational modelling of the most active compounds AMI-10 in its trans and cis form (Fig. 4A) was carried out using the insect nAChR surrogate Aplysia AChBP (protein data bank code 2WNJ)50,52. The reason we chose 2WNJ here is its ability for adopting the large ligand, which has been verified by Kagabu et al. for docking the larger divalent IMI analogues50. IMI and NMI, as comparisons, adopted almost the similar binding mode with the protein, indicating the effectiveness of using [3H]NMI as indicator for in vitro activity. One of the IMI subunits in cis-AMI-10 was situated at the binding pocket to which individual IMI molecule binds, but the nitro-pharmacophores adopt two different binding oritentions (Fig. 4B). For the trans isomers, derivations of binding position were observed in camparison with that of the single IMI (Fig. 4C). In the snapshot (Fig. 4D), the AB section of cis and trans isomers were found to bind with Tyr188 and Trp147, respectively, through π–π stacking interactions. For the cis-form, the bent shape of the molecule made the other IMI segment close to the residues forming the H-bond with Gln57 and Arg59, which consolidated the binding with the receptor. However, in the trans-isomer, the other IMI moiety extended out of the binding pocket without any interaction with the protein. This observation helps explain the activity difference upon irradiation.

Figure 4
figure4

Proposed binding site interactions of AMI-10 with the Aplysia californica acetylcholine binding protein (protein data bank code 2WNJ).

(A) trans- and cis-AMI-10 nestled in the interfacial binding pocket between the (+)-face (primary, green) and (−)-face (complementary, cyan) subunits with the display of binding region (blue grid). Overlay of the docked structures of cis-AMI-10 with IMI (B) and trans-AMI-10 with IMI (C), respectively, in the binding pocket. (D) Interactions of trans- and cis-AMI-10 with the relevant amino acid residues from the binding pocket. (E) Superimpositions of trans- and cis-AMI-10 with IMI in the binding pocket.

Conclusion

Using light as external physical stimuli to perturb insecticidal activity was realized by merging IMI with azobenzene. Divalent AMI-10 had highest potency and gave the most and significant change in insecticidal activity upon irradiation (Fig. 5). Although the complete switching of (on and off) the activity was not achieved, the present findings contribute to developing photoresponsive insecticides. The work illustrates the possibility for modulating insecticide performance using light and for designing conceptually new pesticides.

Figure 5
figure5

A brief conclusion of our work.

The figure was created by ChemBioOffice 2012 and the flies were from the bug template and the lightbulb was created by the shape template and hollow wedged bond.

Methods

Synthesis photoswitchable AMIs

The instruments, chmicals, general sythetic procedures and the structural characterization were provided in supplmentary files.

Photoswitching Experiments

Varian Cary 100 UV-vis spectrophotometer was used for obtaining absorption (UV-Vis) spectra. The solutions of compounds were irradiated with a UV lamp (365 nm). The cis to trans photoisomeriation were performed with a light-emitting diode (blue light, 450 nm). The corresponding UV-Vis spectrums were collected in supplmentary files. The photostationary states were determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) measurements and the trans/cis ratios were calculated at the isosbestic points.

Insecticidal Activity Assay

[3H]NMI (60 Ci/mmol, 98% radiochemical purity) were synthesized by Shanghai Ruxu Radiochemicals Inc. (Shanghai, China).

Insecticidal activity for cowpea aphids (Aphis craccivora)

The plant leaves of horsebean with about 50 apterous adults were dipped in corresponding AMIs solutions containing Triton X-100 (0.1 mg L−1) for 5 s and the excess solutions were sucked out with filter paper. Then the burgeons were positioned in the conditioned room (25 ± 1 °C). Water with Triton X-100 (0.1 mg L−1) was used as control. Twenty-four hour after treatment, the mortality rates were counted. Each treatment had three repetitions and the data were subjected to probit analysis.

Insecticidal test for house fly (Musca domestica)

House fly adults were anesthetized with carbon dioxide for 10 min and then were treated with the AMIs dissolved in distilled water or 10% DMSO aqueous solution by intrathoracic injection (0.4 μL for each fly). Twenty flies were treated for each dosage with duplicate samples. The mortality rates were counted twenty-four hours after treatment. Each treatment had three repetitions and the data subjected to probit analysis.

nAChR binding assays in vitro

House fly heads were collected after the fly adults frozen with liquid nitrogen were broken into body parts. Then the heads were homogenized in 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.32 M sucrose and 100 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.4). The homogenate was treated by filtering through four layers of 64-μm mesh nylon screen. After centrifuging at 500 g for 30 min, the supernatant was collected and again filtered through using the method above. After centrifuging at 25,000 g for 60 min at 4 °C, the pellet was resuspended in binding buffer (mixture of 50 mM sodium chloride and 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4). These brain membranes were used fresh or stored for up to several weeks at −80 °C. Then 1 nM [3H]NMI, varying concentrations of neonicotinoids and 300–500 μg membrane protein in a final volume of 500 μL was incubated at 22 °C for 60 min. The reaction mixture was filtered through Whatman GF/B glass-fiber filters prewetted by binding buffer using a Brandel M-24R Harvester (Gaithersburg, MD) to quantitate the bound [3H]NMI, followed by two rinses each with binding buffer (5 mL) and final liquid scintillation. Nonspecific binding was determined with unlabeled NMI (20 μM). Specific binding was about 80–90% of total binding. The percentage inhibition was determined from two (compounds AMI-1, AMI-2, AMI-5, AMI-6 and azobenzene whose activities were extremely low) or three separate experiments each with triplicate samples. Half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) were determined by nonlinear regression analysis for logarithm of inhibitor concentration versus probit percentage inhibition.

Molecular docking

The most active compounds AMI-10 in its trans and cis form and IMI and NMI as the camparisons were docked to Aplysia californica acetylcholine binding protein (AChBP) crystal structure 2WNJ chain A/E interface using GOLD v3.2 software (The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, Cambridge, U.K.). The Goldscore scoring function was applied to evaluate the docking results. The 2WNJ can bound with a large ligand and was usually used as a prototype for investigating the binding of neonicotinoids. The ligands were drawn and optimized by Maestro 9.0 (Schrödinger, LLC, 2013). All atoms within 10 Å around ZY7 in 2WNJ were selected as binding pocket and used in the docking study. The Goldscore values of the AMI-10 in its trans and cis form were 38.16 and 80.27, respectively.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Xu, Z. et al. Azobenzene Modified Imidacloprid Derivatives as Photoswitchable Insecticides: Steering Molecular Activity in a Controllable Manner. Sci. Rep. 5, 13962; doi: 10.1038/srep13962 (2015).

References

  1. Isman, M. B. & Akhtar, Y. in Insecticides Design Using Advanced Technologies (eds Ishaaya, I., Nauen, R. & Horowitz, A. R. ) Ch. 10, 235–245 (Springer-Verlag, Netherlands, 2007).

  2. Nauen, R. et al. in Modern Crop Protection Compounds 2nd edn, Vol. 3 (eds Krämer, W., Schirmer. U., Jeschke, P. & Witschel, M. ) Ch. 27, 935–956 (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2012).

  3. Casida, J. E. Pest Toxicology: The primary mechanisms of pesticide action. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 22, 609–619 (2009).

  4. Casida, J. E. & Durkin, K. A. Neuroactive insecticides: targets, selectivity, resistance and secondary effects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 58, 99–117 (2013).

  5. Lima, E. A. B. et al. in Insecticides - Advances in Integrated Pest Management (eds Perveen, F. ed.) Ch. 1, 3–16 (InTech, Croatia, 2012).

  6. Köhler, H. R. & Triebskorn, R. Wildlife Ecotoxicology of Pesticides: Can We Track Effects to the Population Level and Beyond? Science, 341, 759–765 (2013).

  7. Gill, R. J., Ramos-Rodriguez, O. & Raine, N. E. Combined pesticide exposure severely affects individual- and colony-level traits in bees. Nature 491, 105–109 (2012).

  8. Henry, M. et al. A common pesticide decreases foraging success and survival in honey bees. Science 336, 348–350 (2012).

  9. Casida, J. E. The greening of pesticide–environment interactions: some personal observations. Environ. Health Persp. 120, 487–493 (2012).

  10. Göstl, R., Senf, A. & Hecht, S. Remote-controlling chemical reactions by light: towards chemistry with high spatio-temporal resolution. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 1982–1996 (2014).

  11. Szymański, W., Beierle, J. M., Kistemaker, H. A. V., Velema, W. A. & Feringa, B. L. Reversible photocontrol of biological systems by the incorporation of molecular photoswitches. Chem. Rev. 113, 6114–6178 (2013).

  12. Riggsbee, C. W. & Deiters, A. Recent advances in the photochemical control of protein function. Trends in Biotechnol. 28, 468–475 (2010).

  13. Peters, M. V., Stoll, R. S., Kühn, A. & Hecht, S. Photoswitching of basicity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 5968–5972 (2008).

  14. Stoll, R. S. & Hecht, S. Artificial light-gated catalyst systems. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 5054–5075 (2010).

  15. Wang J. & Feringa, B. L. Dynamic control of chiral space in a catalytic asymmetric reaction using a molecular motor. Science 331, 1429–1432 (2011).

  16. Samanta, S., Qin, C., Lough, A. J. & Woolley, G. A. Bidirectional photocontrol of peptide conformation with a bridged azobenzene derivative. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 6452–6455 (2012).

  17. Blanco–Lomas, M., Samanta, S., Campos, P. J., Woolley G. A. & Sampedro. D. Reversible photocontrol of peptide conformation with a rhodopsinlike photoswitch. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 6960–6963 (2012).

  18. Gorostiza P. & Isacoff, E. Y. Optical switches for remote and noninvasive control of cell signaling. Science. 322, 395–399 (2008).

  19. Tochitsky, I. et al. Optochemical control of genetically engineered neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Nat. Chem. 4, 105–111 (2012).

  20. Numano, R., Szobota, S., Trauner, D. & Isacoff, E. Y. Mechanisms of photoswitch conjugation and light activation of an ionotropic glutamate receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 10865–10870 (2007).

  21. Levitz, J., Pantoja, C., Gaub. B. Optical control of metabotropic glutamate receptors. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 507–518 (2013).

  22. Kienzler, M. A., Reiner, A., Trautman, E. & Isacoff, E. Y. A red-shifted, fast-relaxing azobenzene photoswitch for visible light control of an ionotropic glutamate receptor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 17683–17686 (2013).

  23. Volgraf, M. et al. Allostrric control of an ionotropic glutamate receptor with an optical switch. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2, 47–52 (2005).

  24. Banghart, M., Borges, K., Isacoff, E. Y., Trauner, D. & Kramer, R. H. Light-activated ion channels for remote control of neuronal firing. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 1381–1386 (2004).

  25. Fortin, D. L. et al. Photochemical control of endogenous ion channels and cellular excitability. Nat. Methods 5, 331–338 (2008).

  26. Gorostiza P. & Isacoff, E. Y. Nanoengineering ion channels for optical control. Physiol. 23, 238–247 (2008).

  27. Kocer, A., Walko, M., Meijberg, W. & Feringa. B. L. A light-actuated nanovalve derived from a channel protein. Science 309, 755–758 (2005).

  28. Mourot, A. et al. Rapid optical control of nociception with an ion-channel photoswitch. Nat. Methods 9, 396–402 (2012).

  29. Kima, Y., Phillips, J. A., Liu, H., Kang, H. & Tan, W. Using photons to manipulate enzyme inhibition by an azobenzene-modified nucleic acid probe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 6489–6494 (2009).

  30. Al–Atar, U., Fernandes, R., Johnsen, B., Baillie, D. & Branda, N. R. A photocontrolled molecular switch regulates paralysis in a living organism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 15966–15967 (2009).

  31. Polosukhina, A. & Litt, J. Photochemical restoration of visual responses in blind mice. Neuron 75, 271–282 (2012).

  32. Szobota, S. et al. Remote control of neuronal activity with a light-gated glutamate receptor. Neuron 54, 535–545 (2007).

  33. Schçnberger, M. & Trauner, D. A. photochromic agonist form-opioid receptors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 3264–3267 (2014).

  34. Babii, O. et al. Controlling biological activity with light: diarylethene-containing cyclic peptidomimetics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 3392–3395 (2014).

  35. Velema, W. A., Toorn, M., Szymanski, W. & Feringa, B. L. Design, synthesis and inhibitory activity of potent, photoswitchable mast cell activation inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 56, 4456–4464 (2013).

  36. Quandt, G. et al. First photoswitchable neurotransmitter transporter inhibitor: light induced control of γ-aminobutyric acid transporter 1 (GAT1) activity in mouse brain. J. Med. Chem. 57, 6809–6821 (2014).

  37. Velema, W. A. et al. Optical control of antibacterial activity. Nat. Chem. 5, 924–928 (2013).

  38. Falenczyk, C. et al. Chromo-pharmacophores: photochromic diarylmaleimide inhibitors for sirtuins. Chem. Sci. 5, 4794–4799 (2014).

  39. Velema, W. A., Szymanski, W. & Feringa, B. L. Photopharmacology: beyond proof of principle. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 2178–2191 (2014).

  40. Bandara, H. M. B. D. & Burdette, S. C. Photoisomerization in different classes of azobenzene. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 1809–1825 (2012).

  41. Hamon, F., Djedaini-Pilard, F., Barbot, F. & Len, C. Azobenzenes-synthesis and carbohydrate applications. Tetrahedron 65, 10105–10123 (2009).

  42. Brown, M. A., Gammon, D. W. & Casida. J. E. Oxime Ether Pyrethroids and Hydroxylamine Ether Propyrethroids: Photochemistry, Biological Activity and Metabolism. J. Agric. Food Chem. 31, 1091–1096 (1983).

  43. Kagabu, S. Discovery of imidacloprid and further developments from strategic molecular designs. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59, 2887–2896 (2011).

  44. Elbert, A., Schindler, M., Nauen, R. & Jeschke, P. Overview of the status and global strategy for neonicotinoids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59, 2897–2908 (2011).

  45. Nauen, F. & Michael, E. B. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists: a milestone for modern crop protection. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 52, 9464–9485 (2013).

  46. Shao, X. S. et al. Divalent and oxabridged neonicotinoids constructed by dialdehydes and nitromethylene analogues of imidacloprid: design, synthesis, crystal structure and insecticidal activities. J. Agric. Food Chem. 58, 2696–2702 (2010).

  47. Shao, X. S., Swenson, T. L. & Casida, J. E. Cycloxaprid insecticide: nicotinic acetylcholine receptor binding site and metabolism. J. Agric. Food Chem. 61, 7883–7888 (2013).

  48. Shao, X. S., Xia, S. S., Durkin, K. A. & Casida, J. E. Insect nicotinic receptor interactions in vivo with neonicotinoid, organophosphorus and methylcarbamate insecticides and a synergist. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 17273–17277 (2013).

  49. Ohno, I., Tomizawa, M., Durkin, K. A., Casida, J. E. & Kagabu, S. Bis-neonicotinoid insecticides: observed and predicted binding interactions with the nicotinic receptor. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19, 3449–3452 (2009).

  50. Kagabu, S. et al. Furan-2,5-dimethylene-tethered bis-imidacloprid insecticide conferring high potency. J. Agric. Food Chem. 58, 11832–11836 (2010).

  51. Kagabu, S., Itazu, Y. & Nishimura, K. Preparation of alkylene-tethered acyclic divalent neonicotinoids and their insecticidal and neuroblocking activities for American cockroach (Periplaneta americana L.). J. Pestic. Sci. 29, 40–42 (2004).

  52. Talley, T. T. et al. Atomic interactions of neonicotinoids agonist with AChBP: molecular recognition of the distinctive electronegative pharmacophore. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 7606–7611 (2008).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor John E. Casida of University of California at Berkeley for facilitating nAChR binding assays in vitro and the help in manuscript preparation. This work was financial supported by National High Technology Research Development Program of China (863 Program, 2011AA10A207), National Natural Science Foundation of China (21372079, 21472046), Shanghai Pujiang Program (14PJD012) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (222201414015).

Author information

X.S. and Z.L. conceived and designed the research and analyzed the results; L.N. performed the chemical synthesis and characterization; X.S. and Z.X. performed the in vitro and in vivo biological assays; D.J. and J.C. performed the molecular docking study; X.S. wrote the paper.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, Z., Shi, L., Jiang, D. et al. Azobenzene Modified Imidacloprid Derivatives as Photoswitchable Insecticides: Steering Molecular Activity in a Controllable Manner. Sci Rep 5, 13962 (2015) doi:10.1038/srep13962

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.