Abstract
Multiferroic BiFeO_{3} exhibits excellent magnetoelectric coupling critical for magnetic information processing with minimal power consumption. However, the degenerate nature of the easy spin axis in the (111) plane presents roadblocks for real world applications. Here, we explore the stabilization and switchability of the weak ferromagnetic moments under applied epitaxial strain using a combination of firstprinciples calculations and grouptheoretic analyses. We demonstrate that the antiferromagnetic moment vector can be stabilized along unique crystallographic directions ([110] and [–110]) under compressive and tensile strains. A direct coupling between the anisotropic antiferrodistortive rotations and the DzyaloshinskiiMoria interactions drives the stabilization of the weak ferromagnetism. Furthermore, energetically competing C and Gtype magnetic orderings are observed at high compressive strains, suggesting that it may be possible to switch the weak ferromagnetism “on” and “off” under the application of strain. These findings emphasize the importance of strain and antiferrodistortive rotations as routes to enhancing induced weak ferromagnetism in multiferroic oxides.
Introduction
The magnetoelectric effect (ME), i.e. controlling ferromagnetism using electric fields and vice versa, has been a focus of research in multiferroic materials due to their potential applications in technologies such as magnetic data storage, spintronics, logic and memory devices^{1,2,3,4}. Unlike conventional magnetic storage devices where magnetic fields are used to read/write information, the ME utilizes electric fields for the read/write operations with virtually no power dissipation. This feature is promising not only for spintronics but also magnonics where the magnetic excitations (spin waves) are used to process information^{3}. Although the ME is technologically attractive, the numbers of candidate materials remain limited. In this regard, bulk bismuth ferrite (BiFeO_{3}) has been explored as a potential candidate. BiFeO_{3} exhibits coupling between ferroelectricity and ferromagnetism at room temperature^{4,5,6} and furthermore, the electricfield control of spin waves has been demonstrated^{2}.
In the rhombohedral groundstate of BiFeO_{3}, weak ferromagnetism (wFM) is induced from a slight canting of the collinear antiferromagnetic moments due to DzyaloshinskiiMoria (DM) interactions^{5}. Here, the strong coupling between atomic distortions and the DM interactions presents a route for tuning the wFM through changes in the lattice modes. It is well known that applied epitaxial strains can significantly affect the structure of the BiFeO_{3} perovskite unit cell resulting in polar cation shifts and/or a suppression or enhancement of the FeO_{6} octahedral tilt patterns; resulting in an array of material responses such as enhanced polarisation^{7} and high piezoresponse^{8} with implications for magnonic and spintronic responses^{1}. Although the ferroelectric properties under applied epitaxial strain have been widely studied in both the tensile and compressive regimes, the evolution of the wFM under applied epitaxial strain remains relatively unexplored area^{1,9,10}.
In this article, we systemically investigate the influence of epitaxial strain on the underlying mechanisms that link wFM with lattice distortions. For this purpose, we perform noncollinear spinpolarised density functional theory (DFT) calculations including spinorbit couplings under applied compressive and tensile strains. Although we neglect the longrange spincycloid (62 nm period) phase that occurs in bulk BiFeO_{3}^{11,12,13,14,15} and the possibility of thermal vibrations (or high temperature phononmagnon couplings)^{16,17}, our theoretical predictions should be relevant for thin films under epitaxial strain at low temperatures as this spincycloid is easily broken with a small amount of epitaxial strain (−1.7% ~ 0.5%)^{1}. Here, we show that the wFM observed for the bulk rhombohedral structure persists for the tested strain values (±5%). Under moderate compressive strains (<−2%), the induced weak ferromagnetic moments due to spin canting remain quasidegenerate in a plane perpendicular to the polarisation direction, but at higher compressive strains the antiferromagnetic vector (L) is stabilized along the [110] crystallographic direction. For tensile strains, on the other hand, L is switched by 90° and stabilized along the [–110] direction. We find that the stabilization of wFM is driven by the interplay between the DzyaloshinskiiMoria (DM) interactions and the single ion anisotropy (SIA); with the DM interactions dominating under tensile strains and the SIA interactions having significant contributions under large compressive strains. Furthermore, we also observe that at high compressive strains (≥−7%), the C and Gtype magnetic orderings compete, energetically. Grouptheoretic analyses indicate a loss of weak ferromagnetism for Ctype magnetic ordering, which is also confirmed by DFT calculations. Thus, it may be possible to either switch on or switch off the weak ferromagnetism under external pressure. Our study offers useful insights for manipulating the distinct magnetic response of a material under epitaxial strain and has important implications towards utilizing the magnetoelectric effect in BiFeO_{3} thin films for future technology.
Results
Weak ferromagnetism in the ground state rhombohedral (R3c) structure
Noncollinear DFT calculations within the LDA + U formalism including spinorbit coupling find that the magnetic ground state of the rhombohedral (R3c) structure exhibits Gtype antiferromagnetic ordering. Furthermore, these collinear magnetic moments are canted due to the DM interactions and result in an induced wFM. In agreement with previous first principles calculations^{18}, we find that the easy spin axis (i.e. the direction of the induced wFM) is degenerate and lies in a plane perpendicular to the polarisation ([111]) direction. Thus the weak ferromagnetic moments may lie along any one of six possible crystallographic directions ([10–1], [–211], [–110], [–121], [01–1] and [11–2]) which are perpendicular to the polarisation vector^{19}, (see Fig. 1a). Here, we make use of spherical polar coordinates (m, θ and φ) to calculate the magnetic energy landscape along all possible crystallographic directions. For this purpose, m is taken as the magnetic moment on an Fe atom, θ is defined as the angle between the initial collinear arrangement of the magnetic moments and the zaxis (θ ∈ [0; 180]) and φ is the angle between the magnetic moment and the xaxis (φ ∈ [0; 360]) along which the magnetic moments are constrained. Both θ and φ are varied in steps of 15°, resulting in a total of 288 noncollinear calculations at each strain value. These calculations were performed in a highthroughput fashion using the Nexus workflow automation system^{20}. As depicted in Fig. 1b), we observe that the maximum energy configuration (the bright red and white region) corresponds to θ = 54.73 and φ = 45°, which is precisely the direction of the polarisation vector along the [111] direction. The minimum energy configurations (dark black region), on the other hand, show that the antiferromagnetic vector (L) is degenerate in a plane that is perpendicular to the polarisation vector. Thus, as a consequence the easy spin axis corresponding to the induced weak ferromagnetism is also degenerate in the (111) plane. An energy difference of ~2 meV was observed between magnetic moments aligned parallel and perpendicular to the polarisation vector.
In addition, our analysis of the magnetic ground state shows that the magnetic moments are canted by ~1° away from their initial collinear arrangement, resulting in a small but measurable spontaneous net magnetisation (M_{s}) of 0.033 μB/Fe in good agreement with earlier reports^{10,18}. Moreover, this value of magnetization also agrees quite well with various thin film measurements^{21,22,23}, justifying the choice of the Hubbard parameter (U_{eff} = 2 eV) in the calculations. To elucidate the observed degeneracy of the easy spin axis in the plane perpendicular to the polarisation direction, we explicitly calculated the DM interactions for the rhombohedral structure (refer to the Methods section for details). For the R3c symmetry, the DM vector points along the [111] direction with isotropic local components i.e. D_{1} = D_{2} = D_{3}. Consequently, wFM is degenerate in a plane perpendicular to the DM vector since D, L and M_{s} form a righthanded system. The calculated strength of the DM interaction is 304 μeV. (N.B. although this value is overestimated compared to the experimental value of 162 μeV^{24} due to the chosen Hubbard parameter (U_{eff} = 2 eV); we expect the predicted trends to remain valid. We have verified this with calculations employing a higher U_{eff} (=5 eV) value which reduces the strength of the DM interaction to 182 μeV, in good agreement with experiment. However, higher values of U_{eff} also lead to larger deviations in lattice parameter and antiferrodistortive angles, hence, in this study we use U_{eff} = 2 eV which gives a more reliable description of the structure).
Coupling between the antiferrodistortive rotations and ferroelectric polarisation
We now discuss the changes in the electric polarisation direction and the AFD rotations with respect to applied epitaxial strain. Under applied compressive strains, the polarisation vector rotates along the (–110) plane towards the [001] direction (decreasing θ, while φ remains constant), away from the R3c [111]. On the other hand, for tensile strains the polarisation vector rotates towards the [110] direction along the (–110) plane. The rotation of the polarisation vector is strongly correlated with the FeO_{6} octahedral rotation patterns. Figure 2 summarises the changes in the x, y and zcomponents of the polarisation vector and the antiferrodistortive (AFD) rotations as a function of applied epitaxial strain. For the rhombohedral ground state, the calculated outofphase rotation of the FeO_{6} octahedra about the [111] direction is 13.2°, which is in good agreement with the experimentally measured value of 12.8°^{25}. For compressive strains, we observe that the inplane (x and y) components of the AFD rotations increase from 13.2° to 14°, while the zcomponent, rapidly decreases from 13.2° to 11.5°. For tensile strains, the x and ycomponents of the AFD rotations rapidly decrease from 13.2° to 11° while the zcomponent remains nearly constant.
Stabilization of weak ferromagnetic moments under applied epitaxial strain
Next, we discuss the evolution of the induced weak ferromagnetism under applied epitaxial strain. Figure 3 shows the calculated magnetic energy landscapes under applied compressive and tensile strains. We observe that the wFM observed in the case of the rhombohedral ground state also persists for the tested strain values (±5%). In the tensile regime (the lower panel of Fig. 3), we observe that the degeneracy of the induced weak ferromagnetic moments is quickly lifted resulting in a preferred orientation along specific crystallographic directions. A careful analysis of the wFM shows that both the easy and hard spin axes now lie in the xy plane and L is stabilized along the [–110] direction. The spontaneous magnetisation is found to linearly decrease from 0.033μB for the R3c structure to 0.026μB for the highest strained (+5%) phase.
For the compressive regime, the magnetic energy landscape depicts a hard spin axis that closely follows the rotating polarisation vector with increasing compressive strain; again, due to the right hand rule L is always perpendicular to this direction. Furthermore, the weak ferromagnetic moments are quasidegenerate in a plane that is perpendicular to the polarisation vector for moderate compressive strains (≤2%). For higher strain values, however, the degeneracy disappears and L is stabilized along the [110] crystallographic direction. Similar to the tensile strained systems, the spontaneous magnetisation decreases almost linearly from 0.033μB for the R3c structure to 0.028μB for the highest strained (−5% strain) phase.
Colossal response in DzyaloshinskiiMoria interactions and single ion anisotropy
To analyse the spin polarisation along the unique [110] and [–110] directions, we calculated the DM interactions and SIA for each strained phase. It is important to recall that the spin canting is induced by the AFD rotations and hence, the wFM and by extension the DM interactions may be directly linked to the amplitude of these distortions. The variations in the components of the local DM vector (D_{{1,2,3}}) as a function of applied epitaxial stain are shown in Fig. 4. For the rhombohedral structure, we have isotropic DM interactions with D_{1} = D_{2} = D_{3} = 304 μeV. On the other hand, the calculated SIA (refer to Fig. 5) is merely 11 μeV (which compares well with the experimentally measured value of 3.5 μeV^{26}); significantly lower than the DM interactions and thus does not compete with the DM interactions. It is interesting to note that the easy spin axis (n) actually points exactly along the [111] direction. However, since the energy gain from the isotropic DM interactions is dominant, net spins are polarised along a direction perpendicular to [111]. Furthermore, the rotational symmetry promotes the degeneracy of the easy spin axis in the (111) plane. Hence, as a result of the isotropic DM interactions pointing along the [111] direction both L, the induced weak ferromagnetic moments are degenerate in a plane perpendicular to the polarisation direction.
For the tensile region, we observe that the inplane components of the DM vector are reduced as a consequence of broken rotational symmetry and reduced xy components of the AFD rotations. The DM vectors move away from the zaxis along the (–110) plane. For the highest strained phase (5%), the components of the local DM vector are anisotropic and the DM vector actually points along the [11ε] (ε ≪ 1) direction. The SIA moderately increases from 11 μeV corresponding to the R3c structure to 73 μeV for the highest strained phase and the SIA vector (n) makes an angle of ~20° with respect to the zaxis as shown in Fig. 5b. The SIA, however, is still much smaller than the predicted DM interactions. Thus, even though the SIA is pointed along the zaxis, the stabilization of the L vector corresponding to the magnetic ground state is along the [–110] crystallographic direction due to the dominant DM interactions.
Under compressive strain, on the other hand, we observe that the inplane (D_{1}, D_{2}) components of the DM vector are enhanced as a consequence of the broken rotational symmetry. The DM vector closely follows the polarisation direction and rotates towards the zaxis in the (–110) plane. The weak ferromagnetism, M_{s}, is related to the sign of D in such a way that the three vectors  D, S_{1} and S_{2} form a right handed system^{27}. As the DM vector rotates towards the zaxis, the antiferromagnetic vector, L, (which is perpendicular to the DM vector) rotates towards the xy plane. In this process, only a few crystallographic directions that are commensurate with the anisotropic DM vector remain degenerate in the magnetic energy landscape. Additionally, we observe that the SIA is significantly enhanced from 11 μeV (for the rhombohedral ground state) to 247 μeV for the highest compressively strained phase and now competes with the DM interactions (D_{1} = D_{2} = 364 μeV D_{3} = 98 μeV). Moreover, the SIA vector (n) lies in the xy plane. Thus, because of the strongly enhanced SIA, L is stabilized along the [110] direction for the highest strained phase.
The atomistic origin of the enhancement in the DM interactions can be attributed to the changes in the AFD rotations. We observe that the strength of the DM interactions is proportional to the amplitude of the AFD rotations, under both compressive and tensile strains, which exhibit a direct coupling between the DM interactions and the lattice modes. The changes in the SIA, on the other hand, are related to the FeO hybridization. The spinorbit coupling induced energy correction is proportional to the extent of pd hybridization between the Op and Fed states. In the case of compressive strains where the inplane FeFe separation is reduced and consequently the FeO hybridization increases, the SIA is enhanced in the xy plane. On the other hand, tensile strains reduce the outofplane FeFe separation and enhance the out of plane FeO hybridization thereby rotating the SIA towards the zaxis away from the [111] direction.
Symmetrydriven magnetic switch at high compressive strain
So far, we have discussed the evolution of the weak ferromagnetism with Gtype magnetic ordering. Here, we examine the possibility of magnetic switching under applied epitaxial strain. Figure 6b shows the total energy difference along with the induced wFM moments for the A and Ctype magnetic orderings relative to the ground state Gtype order. For all strain values studied, the Gtype magnetic ordering is the ground state magnetic configuration. The nonmagnetic ordering is typically ~1.0–1.4 eV higher in energy compared to the Gtype magnetic ordering indicating that the antiferromagnetic order is robust at room temperature (see supplementary information Table S1 for details). Furthermore, the Atype magnetic ordering is always higher in energy compared to the C and Gtype magnetic orderings. Under compressive strains, the energy difference between the C and Gtype magnetic orderings decreases rapidly with increasing strain and at high strain values (≥7%) the energy difference is nullified making these two types of magnetic orderings indistinguishable. Such indistinguishability between the energetically competing C and Gtype magnetic orderings has been observed in experiments for the tetragonal like (T’) monoclinic phase at ~4.5% compressive strain^{28}. Most interestingly, a symmetry analysis for the Ctype magnetic ordering shows that the DM interactions of neighbouring planes (refer to the supplementary information Table S2) result in weak antiferromagnetism (wAFM). The energetic similarity of the C and Gtype antiferromagnetic ordering at large compressive strains and the transition from net wFM for the Gtype ordering to net wAFM for Ctype ordering, suggest that it may be possible to switch the wFM “on” or “off” through the application of external pressure or modulation of lattice modes in these materials.
Discussion
In summary, we have studied the effects of applied biaxial compressive and tensile strains on the evolution of the net weak ferromagnetism in BiFeO_{3}. The magnetic energy landscapes, constructed from noncollinear spin polarised DFT calculations, indicate that induced weak ferromagnetic moments are always aligned perpendicular to the polarisation vector and persist for strains up to ±5%. Furthermore, the spontaneous net magnetisation is only marginally reduced for large strains compared to the bulk. For the rhombohedral structure the weak ferromagnetic moments are degenerate (in plane perpendicular to the polarisation direction) due to the isotropic nature of the DM interactions and the rotational symmetry. Such degeneracy, however, disappears for the strained phases and the antiferromagnetic vector is stabilized along [110] and [–110] crystallographic directions for compressive and tensile strains, respectively. The stabilization of the magnetic moments is correlated with the reduction of AFD rotations along specific crystallographic axes (zaxis for compressive strains and xy for tensile strains); resulting in anisotropic DM interactions. The strength of the DM interactions is proportional to the AFD rotations, which opens a possibility for enhancing the induced wFM through modulation of the lattice modes. Furthermore, at high compressive strains both the C and Gtype magnetic orderings compete. Group theoretic analyses indicate the loss of weak ferromagnetism for the Ctype magnetic order. Thus, the wFM can be switched “on” and “off” depending on the type of magnetic ordering. These results have profound implications for using multiferroic oxide films in spintronics devices where it is possible to use epitaxial strain or external pressure to control the spin polarisation along certain crystallographic directions.
Method and Computational Details
All calculations were performed using density functional theory (DFT) with the local spin density approximation (LSDA) employing the projectoraugmentedplanewave (PAW) method^{29}, as implemented in the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP 5.2)^{30,31}. The PAW potentials used explicitly treat 15 valence electrons for Bi (5d^{10} 6s^{2} 6p^{3}), 14 for Fe (3p^{6} 3d^{6} 4s^{2}) and 6 for oxygen (2s^{2} 2p^{4}). A cutoff energy of 520 eV was used to terminate the planewave expansion. We considered a 2 × 2 × 2 supercell containing 40 atoms which can accommodate all the possible antiferrodistortive rotations of the FeO_{6} octahedra. Structural optimizations were achieved by allowing the atoms in the unit cell to relax until the HellmannFeynman forces on each atomic site were below 5 meV/Ǻ, while simultaneously achieving a total energy convergence of 1e^{−6} eV. This convergence was obtained with a 4 × 4 × 4 MonkhorstPack special kpoint grid. To correct for the metallic behavior observed in the LDA band structure we have applied the Hubbard parameter, U_{eff} = 2 eV^{32}, on Fed states in our calculations using the rotationally invariant scheme of Dudarev et al.^{33} in which the onsite Coulomb interaction (U) and parameter J are combined into a single parameter U_{eff} (=U – J).
The DM interaction has the following form:
Here, D is the coupling vector for the spinorbit interaction, L is the antiferromagnetic vector defined as L = M_{Fe1} − M_{Fe2} and M_{s} is the resulting magnetisation due to the canted moments (M_{s} = M_{Fe1} + M_{Fe2}). These three vectors (D, L and M_{s}) form a righthanded system and for a fixed orientation of D and L, only one canting direction lowers the energy relative to the collinear state. We calculate the DM vectors (D_{{1,2,3}}) and SIA using the method proposed by C. Weingert et al.^{27}. For this purpose, we used 2 × 2 × 2 supercells containing 8 formula units. Artificial calculations are performed by selecting two Fe atoms along either a, b or caxis directions and replacing the remaining Fe atoms in the supercell with nonmagnetic Al ions. The DM vectors can then be extracted using a perpendicular arrangement of spins with:
The three local planar components D_{1}, D_{2} and D_{3} lie in the xy, yz and xz planes, respectively.
The SIA is calculated by replacing all except one of the Fe atoms with nonmagnetic Al atoms and later performing constrained calculations along all possible directions to calculate the SIA vector n. The magnitude of SIA, K, was obtained by fitting the following expression:
with n = in the spherical coordinate. In our simulations, is always realized.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Dixit, H. et al. Stabilization of weak ferromagnetism by strong magnetic response to epitaxial strain in multiferroic BiFeO_{3}. Sci. Rep. 5, 12969; doi: 10.1038/srep12969 (2015).
References
Sando, D. et al. Crafting the magnonic and spintronic response of BiFeO3 films by epitaxial strain. Nat. Mater. 12, 641–646 (2013).
Allibe, J. et al. Room Temperature Electrical Manipulation of Giant Magnetoresistance in Spin Valves ExchangeBiased with BiFeO3 . Nano Lett. 12, 1141–1145 (2012).
Kruglyak, V. V., Demokritov, S. O. & Grundler, D. Magnonics. J. Phys. Appl. Phys. 43, 264001 (2010).
Holcomb, M. B. et al. Probing the evolution of antiferromagnetism in multiferroics. Phys. Rev. B 81, 134406 (2010).
Ederer, C. & Spaldin, N. A. Weak ferromagnetism and magnetoelectric coupling in bismuth ferrite. Phys. Rev. B 71, 060401 (2005).
Heron, J. T. et al. Deterministic switching of ferromagnetism at room temperature using an electric field. Nature 516, 370–373 (2014).
Zeches, R. J. et al. A StrainDriven Morphotropic Phase Boundary in BiFeO3 . Science 326, 977–980 (2009).
Chen, Z. et al. Coexistence of ferroelectric triclinic phases in highly strained BiFeO3 films. Phys. Rev. B 84, 094116 (2011).
Dupé, B., Prosandeev, S., Geneste, G., Dkhil, B. & Bellaiche, L. BiFeO3 Films under Tensile Epitaxial Strain from First Principles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 237601 (2011).
Wojdeł, J. & Íñiguez, J. Ab Initio Indications for Giant Magnetoelectric Effects Driven by Structural Softness. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 037208 (2010).
Sosnowska, I., Peterlin Neumaier, T. & Steichele, E. Spiral magnetic ordering in bismuth ferrite. J. Phys. C: Solid State 15, 4835 (1982).
Kadomtseva, A. M. et al. Spacetime parity violation and magnetoelectric interactions in antiferromagnets. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 79, 571–581 (2004).
Lebeugle, D. et al. Electricfieldinduced spin flop in BiFeO3 single crystals at room temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100. 227602 (2008).
Lee, S. et al. Single ferroelectric and chiral magnetic domain of singlecrystalline BiFeO3 in an electric field. Phys. Rev. B 78, 100101 (2008).
Johnson, R. D. et al. Xray imaging and multiferroic coupling of cycloidal magnetic domains in ferroelectric monodomain BiFeO3 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 217206 (2013).
Xiao, J. et al. Temperaturemediated magnetism in Fedoped ZnO semiconductors. J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 5338–5342 (2013).
Delaire, O. et al. Anharmonic phonons and magnons in BiFeO3 . Phys. Rev. B 85, 064405 (2012).
Ederer, C. & Spaldin, N. Weak ferromagnetism and magnetoelectric coupling in bismuth ferrite. Phys. Rev. B 71, (2005).
Holcomb, M. B. et al. Probing the evolution of antiferromagnetism in multiferroics. Phys. Rev. B 81, (2010).
Nexus  QMCPACK. at http://qmcpack.org/nexus/ Retrieved 29 June 29, 2015.
Eerenstein, W. et al. Comment on ‘Epitaxial BiFeO3 Multiferroic Thin Film Heterostructures’. Science 307, 1203–1203 (2005).
Béa, H., Bibes, M., Petit, S., Kreisel, J. & Barthélémy, A. Structural distortion and magnetism of BiFeO3 epitaxial thin films: A Raman spectroscopy and neutron diffraction study. Philos. Mag. Lett. 87, 165–174 (2007).
Bai, F. et al. Destruction of spin cycloid in (111) coriented BiFeO3 thin films by epitiaxial constraint: Enhanced polarization and release of latent magnetization. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 032511–032511–3 (2005).
Matsuda, M. et al. Magnetic Dispersion and Anisotropy in Multiferroic BiFeO3 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 067205 (2012).
Palewicz, A., Przeniosło, R., Sosnowska, I. & Hewat, A. W. Atomic displacements in BiFeO3 as a function of temperature: neutron diffraction study. Acta Crystallogr. B 63, 537–544 (2007).
Nagel, U. et al. Terahertz Spectroscopy of Spin Waves in Multiferroic BiFeO3 in High Magnetic Fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 257201 (2013).
Weingart, C., Spaldin, N. & Bousquet, E. Noncollinear magnetism and singleion anisotropy in multiferroic perovskites. Phys. Rev. B 86, 094413 (2012).
MacDougall, G. J. et al. Antiferromagnetic transitions in tetragonallike BiFeO3 . Phys. Rev. B 85, 100406 (2012).
Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmentedwave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of abinitio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a planewave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio totalenergy calculations using a planewave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).
Neaton, J. B., Ederer, C., Waghmare, U. V., Spaldin, N. A. & Rabe, K. M. Firstprinciples study of spontaneous polarization in multiferroic BiFeO3 . Phys. Rev. B 71, 014113 (2005).
Dudarev, S. L. et al. Electronenergyloss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+ U study. Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505 (1998).
Momma, K. & Izumi, F. VESTA 3 for threedimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272–1276 (2011).
Acknowledgements
Research supported by the US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences (BES), Materials Sciences and Engineering Division (J.H.L., S.O., H.D. and V.R.C.) and the Office of Science Early Career Research Program (V.R.C.). This research used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, which is supported by the Office of Science of the US Department of Energy under Contract No. DEAC0205CH11231. Research by J.T.K. (Nexus workflows) was conducted at the Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, which is a DOE office of Science User Facility.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
J.H.L. conceived the original idea and H.D. performed all the calculations. H.D., J.H.L., S.O. and V.R.C. discussed the results and wrote the article. J.T.K. was responsible for the graphics and support related to the Nexus tool.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Dixit, H., Hee Lee, J., Krogel, J. et al. Stabilization of weak ferromagnetism by strong magnetic response to epitaxial strain in multiferroic BiFeO_{3}. Sci Rep 5, 12969 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12969
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12969
Further reading

Ferromagneticlike behavior of Bi0.9La0.1FeO3–KBr nanocomposites
Scientific Reports (2019)

Complex strain evolution of polar and magnetic order in multiferroic BiFeO3 thin films
Nature Communications (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.