Article | Open Access | Published:

Simultaneous fingerprint and high-wavenumber fiber-optic Raman spectroscopy improves in vivo diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma at endoscopy

Scientific Reports volume 5, Article number: 12957 (2015) | Download Citation

Abstract

This work aims to evaluate clinical value of a fiber-optic Raman spectroscopy technique developed for in vivo diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) during clinical endoscopy. We have developed a rapid fiber-optic Raman endoscopic system capable of simultaneously acquiring both fingerprint (FP)(800–1800 cm−1) and high-wavenumber (HW)(2800–3600 cm−1) Raman spectra from esophageal tissue in vivo. A total of 1172 in vivo FP/HW Raman spectra were acquired from 48 esophageal patients undergoing endoscopic examination. The total Raman dataset was split into two parts: 80% for training; while 20% for testing. Partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and leave-one patient-out, cross validation (LOPCV) were implemented on training dataset to develop diagnostic algorithms for tissue classification. PLS-DA-LOPCV shows that simultaneous FP/HW Raman spectroscopy on training dataset provides a diagnostic sensitivity of 97.0% and specificity of 97.4% for ESCC classification. Further, the diagnostic algorithm applied to the independent testing dataset based on simultaneous FP/HW Raman technique gives a predictive diagnostic sensitivity of 92.7% and specificity of 93.6% for ESCC identification, which is superior to either FP or HW Raman technique alone. This work demonstrates that the simultaneous FP/HW fiber-optic Raman spectroscopy technique improves real-time in vivo diagnosis of esophageal neoplasia at endoscopy.

Introduction

Esophageal cancer is the eighth most frequent malignancy worldwide with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 19% in the Unites States1,2. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is one of the deadly esophageal cancers3. Current routine diagnosis of ESCC is based on white light reflectance (WLR) endoscopy which heavily relies on visual identification of gross morphological tissue changes, leading to poor diagnosis accuracy1,2,3. Existing diagnostic guidelines recommend extensive biopsy samplings (typically four-quadrant samplings) at every 1–2 cm interval along suspicious lesions segments during endoscopic inspections of patients4. This approach produces a vast number of negative biopsies without much improving the diagnostic yield, but is clinically labor intensive and a burden to the patients. There is a need to develop advanced optical diagnostic techniques for objective diagnosis and characterization of esophageal tissue with biomolecular specificity.

Optical spectroscopic techniques (e.g., fluorescence, diffuse reflectance, and Raman) have been comprehensively investigated for precancer and cancer diagnosis in internal organs (e.g., stomach, esophagus, colon, bladder, and lung, etc.)5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25. Raman spectroscopy is an optical vibrational technique based on the fundamental principle of inelastic light scattering26, which is capable of probing biochemical and biomolecular structures and conformations of cells and tissue associated with disease transformation7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25. Currently, biomedical Raman research in diagnosing precancer and cancer is mostly centered on the fingerprint (FP) range (i.e., 800–1800 cm−1) that contains rich biochemical information about the tissue7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18. The unrivaled advantage of the FP Raman spectroscopy technique stems from its capability to uncover specific information about backbone structures of proteins, lipids and nucleic acid assemblies in cells and tissue7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18. The efficiency of the FP Raman spectroscopy technique is, however, compromised in certain organ sites owing to extremely weak tissue Raman signals but overwhelming tissue autofluorescence (AF) background. Recent attentions have been directed towards the use of high-wavenumber (HW) regime (e.g., 2800–3600 cm−1), as the HW spectral range exhibits stronger tissue Raman signals with less AF interference19,20,21,22,23,24,25. The clinical rationales for combining the FP and HW spectral ranges for in vivo esohphageal Raman measurements are therefore manifold: (i) For tissues that could exhibit intense AF overwhelming the tissue FP Raman signals, the HW range could still contain intense tissue Raman peaks with diagnostic information, (ii) The FP and HW Raman spectra offer complementary biomolecular information, and the integrated FP/HW Raman technique could improve tissue characterization and diagnosis24,25. To date, the simultaneous FP and HW Raman spectroscopic technique has not yet been investigated for distinguishing ESCC from normal esophagus. This work aims to assess the clinical value of a simultaneous FP and HW fiber-optic Raman spectroscopy technique developed for improving real-time in vivo diagnosis of ESCC at endoscopy. Unpaired two-sided Student’s t-test is employed to extract the statistically different Raman spectral features between ESCC and normal esophageal tissues. Partial least squares - discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and leave-one patient-out, cross validation (LOPCV) are further implemented to develop robust diagnostic algorithms for differentiation between ESCC and normal esophagus.

Results

A total of 1172 in vivo FP/HW tissue Raman spectra (normal (n = 860); ESCC (n = 312)) were acquired from 48 esophageal patients undergoing routine endoscopic examination (see Supplementary Fig. S1 online). The total in vivo Raman dataset acquired was split into two parts: i.e., 80% of the total dataset for training (938 in vivo FP/HW Raman spectra [normal (n = 736); ESCC (n = 202)] from 34 esophageal patients); while the remaining 20% of the total dataset for predictive testing (234 in vivo FP/HW Raman spectra [normal (n = 124); ESCC (n = 110)] from 14 esophageal patients). Figure 1(a) shows the mean in vivo FP/HW tissue Raman spectra ± 1standard deviation (SD) (shaded area) of the training dataset (80% of the total dataset) for tissue diagnostic algorithms development. The corresponding images of the WLR-guided FP/HW Raman procedures are also shown in Fig. 1. Prominent esophageal tissue Raman peaks with tentative assignments7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18 can be observed in the FP region, i.e., 853 (v(C-C) proteins), 1004 (νs(C-C) ring breathing of phenylalanine), 1078 (ν(C-C) of lipids), 1265 (amide III v(C-N) and δ(N-H) of proteins), 1302 (CH2 twisting and wagging of lipids), 1335 (CH3CH2 twisting of proteins and nucleic acids), 1445 (δ(CH2) deformation of proteins and lipids), 1618 (v(C = C) of porphyrins), 1655 (amide I v(C = O) of proteins) and 1745 cm−1 (v(C = O) of phospholipids). Intense Raman peaks are also observed in the HW region18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25, i.e., 2850 and 2885 cm−1 (symmetric and asymmetric CH2 stretching of lipids), 2940 cm−1 (CH3 stretching of proteins), ~3300 cm−1 (amide A (NH stretching of proteins)) and the broad Raman band of water (OH stretching vibrations peaking at ~3250 and ~3400 cm−1) that are related to the local conformation and interactions of OH-bonds in the intracellular and extracellular space of esophageal tissue27,28. The intense broad Raman band of water above 3000 cm−1 has also been observed in other soft tissues (e.g., brain, oral tissue)27,28. Figure 1(b) shows the difference Raman spectra between ESCC and normal esophageal tissue ± 1SD (shaded area), reflecting the Raman-active component changes associated with cancerous progression in the esophagus. The significant difference (p = 1.3E-8, unpaired two-sided Student’s t-test) in Raman spectra of ESCC and normal tissue discerned (Fig. 1(b)) demonstrates the potential of simultaneous FP/HW Raman endoscopy for in vivo diagnosis of esophageal cancer.

Figure 1
Figure 1

(a) The mean in vivo FP/HW Raman spectra ± 1 standard deviation (SD) of the training dataset (80% of the total dataset) (normal (n = 736); ESCC (n = 202)) for diagnostic algorithms development; (b) Difference spectra (ESCC - normal) ± 1 SD resolving the unique spectral features of ESCC. The corresponding images of the WLR-guided FP/HW Raman procedures on normal esophagus and ESCC are also shown.

To elucidate the diagnostically important Raman-active components, Fig. 2(a) shows a logarithmic plot of the calculated p-values (unpaired two-sided Student’s t-test) for each of the Raman intensities in the entire spectral range (i.e., 800–1800 cm−1 and 2800–3600 cm−1). In particular, seven spectral sub-regions with statically significant difference (p < 1E-10) between ESCC and normal esophagus were found: i.e., 840–940 cm−1, 1025–1100 cm−1, 1310–1355 cm−1, 1585–1690 cm−1, and 2830–2975 cm−1 related to proteins, lipids and nucleic acids. Significant spectral differences were also observed in bound water in the ranges of 3160–3260 cm−1 and 3370–3420 cm−1. Figure 2(b) displays a histogram of the most statistically different Raman peak intensities (mean ± 1SD) for both the FP and HW ranges, i.e., (i) 853 cm−1, (ii) 1078 cm−1, (iii) 1335 cm−1, (iv) 1618 cm−1, (v) 1655 cm−1, (vi) 2850 cm−1, (vii) 2885 cm−1, (viii) 3250 cm−1, and (ix) 3400 cm−1. The histopathology identifies prominent cellular and architectural anomalies in ESCC (Fig. 3), while the relatively higher or lower FP/HW tissue Raman bands representing different Raman-active components reveal the specific biochemical/biomolecular changes of esophageal tissue accompanied with ESCC transformation. The changes of FP/HW Raman spectra related to lipids, proteins, DNA and water contents in tissue reconfirm the capability of simultaneous FP/HW Raman spectroscopy to detect ESCC at the molecular level.

Figure 2
Figure 2

(a) Unpaired two-sided Student’s t-test on Raman peak intensities of the training dataset (80% of the total dataset) (normal (n = 736); ESCC (n = 202)) over the entire spectral range (i.e., 800–1800 cm−1 and 2800–3600 cm−1). Seven Raman spectra sub-regions containing the diagnostically significant information were identified. (b) Histogram ± 1 SD of the most diagnostically significant Raman peaks (*p < 1E-10).

Figure 3: Representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained histopathologic slides (original magnification, ×200) corresponding to different esophageal tissue types measured:
Figure 3

(a) Normal superficial keratinised squamous epithelium and the basal layer; (b) Invasive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma showing prominent architectural and cytological atypia.

Capitalizing on the complementary biochemical/biomolecular information identified in both the FP and HW spectral ranges, PLS-DA and LOPCV are implemented on the training dataset (80% of the total dataset) (Fig. 1(a)) to develop robust diagnostic model for enhancing in vivo ESCC diagnosis. A Cohen’s kappa of 0.91 demonstrated a high level of agreement between the independent pathologists for the esophageal tissue groupings29. Figure 4 shows the scattered plots of cross-validated PLS-DA posterior probability of each Raman prediction for (a) FP, (b) HW, and (c) integrated FP/HW, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy with integrated FP/HW Raman spectroscopy is 97.3% [sensitivity of 97.0% (196/202) and specificity of 97.4% (717/736)], superior to using either FP (accuracy of 90.9%, sensitivity of 93.6% (189/202), and specificity of 90.2% (664/736)) or HW (accuracy of 85.5%, sensitivity of 78.2%(158/202), and specificity of 87.5% (644/736)) Raman technique alone. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves are also generated (Fig. 5), with the integration areas under the ROC curves of being 0.972, 0.928 and 0.995, respectively, for the FP, HW and the integrated FP/HW techniques. The above results confirm that the integrated FP/HW Raman technique provides the best diagnostic performance for in vivo ESCC detection as compared to FP or HW Raman technique.

Figure 4
Figure 4

The posterior probabilities of in vivo Raman spectra belonging to (i) normal esophagus (n = 736), and (ii) ESCC (n = 202) of the training dataset (80% of the total dataset), using partial lease square-discriminant analysis and leave-one-patient out cross validation based on the FP, HW and the integrated FP/HW Raman techniques, respectively. () normal; (▲) ESCC.

Figure 5: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for separating ESCC from normal esophageal tissue for the training dataset (80% of the total dataset).
Figure 5

The areas under the ROC curves (AUC) are 0.972, 0.928 and 0.995, respectively, using the FP, HW and the integrated FP/HW Raman techniques.

In the light of the promising diagnostic results presented (Figs 4 and 5), we have applied the simultaneous FP/HW Raman spectroscopy and diagnostic algorithms developed for predictive diagnosis of the independent testing dataset (20% of the total dataset)(see Supplementary Fig. S2 online). The predictive accuracy of 93.2% (i.e., sensitivity of 92.7% (102/110) and specificity of 93.6% (116/124)) can be achieved by using the integrated FP/HW Raman spectroscopy, substantiating the advantages of simultaneous FP/HW Raman spectroscopy over FP (predictive accuracy of 91.0%; sensitivity of 90.9% (100/110), and specificity of 91.9% (113/124)) or HW (predictive accuracy of 80.3%; sensitivity of 76.4% (84/110), and specificity of 83.9% (104/124)) Raman technique for in vivo ESCC diagnosis (see Supplementary Fig. S3 online).

Discussion

We have successfully acquired high-quality in vivo FP/HW Raman spectra from esophagus tissue in real-time (<1 sec) during clinical endoscopic examination. Significant FP and HW Raman spectral differences between ESCC and normal esophageal tissue are observed. Statistically significant different sub-regions of FP Raman bands (840–940, 1025–1100, 1310–1355, and 1585–1690 cm−1) were identified, uncovering highly specific biochemical changes of esophageal tissue associated with ESCC transformation. For instance, ESCC was characterised by significantly reduced Raman peak intensities at 1078 cm−1 (v(C = C)) (p = 2.3E-59), indicating a relative reduction in lipid content that is likely due to the thickening of the cancerous esophageal mucosa obscuring the Raman signals from deeper tissue layers30. The increase of proteins content was indicated by the sensitive biomarkers at 1618 cm−1 and the band broadening of 1655 cm−1 (amide I v(C = O) of proteins) for ESCC. This observation is in agreement with the molecular biology study whereby an over-expression of various proteins associated with ESCC has been reported31. Moreover, ESCC shows an increased DNA content exhibiting much stronger Raman intensity at 1335 cm−1 (CH3CH2 twisting of proteins and nucleic acids), which is complied with the DNA changes associated with precancer and cancer transformation7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,24,25. On the other hand, unpaired two-sided Student’s t-test identified three statistically different sub-regions of HW Raman bands (2830-2975, 3160-3260 and 3370–3420 cm−1) related to lipids, proteins and water changes associated with ESCC transformation. ESCC was characterised by a relatively decreased lipid and increased protein content as indicated by the higher Raman peak intensity ratio of I2940/I2850in ESCC. The result is consistent with the changes of lipids and proteins content observed in other clinical studies of Raman spectroscopy for disease diagnosis7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25. Different water content (OH stretching vibrations peaking at ~3250 and ~3400 cm−1) was observed between ESCC and normal esophagus as indicated by the significantly different ratio (p = 3.2E-7) of asymmetric to symmetric OH stretching peaking at ~3250 and ~3400 cm−1, reflecting the local structure of hydrogen-bonded networks in the epithelium32. The relative increase of the OH stretching vibrational intensity suggests that neoplastic epithelium is accompanied with an increased content of water in tissue associated with ESCC, which is probably due to the increased cellularity and proliferation of ESCC in the esophagus32,33. Three Raman peak intensity ratios (i.e., I2885/I2940, I2940/I3250, and I2885/I3250) were also calculated, suggesting that ESCC could be separated from normal esophageal tissue with sensitivities of 48.5% (98/202), 57.9% (117/202), 73.3% (148/202), and specificities of 54.6% (402/736), 64.1% (472/736), 64.3% (473/736), respectively. These findings indicate that the water perfusion in ESCC is one of the important biomarkers for esophageal neoplasia detection in vivo.

To employ the Raman-based biochemical/biomolecular information for ESCC diagnosis, we further developed a robust PLS-DA classification model constructed from the training dataset (80% of the total dataset). The PLS-DA algorithms based on the integrated FP/HW Raman spectra could differentiate ESCC from normal esophagus mucosa with a good diagnostic accuracy (accuracy of 97.3% (913/938)). The FP Raman spectrum contains highly specific information about proteins, lipids and DNA conformations. On the other hand, the HW spectral range contains complementary information related to local conformation of bound and unbound water as well as CH2 and CH3 stretching moieties of lipids and proteins that are not reflected in the FP range, enabling back-tracking of misclassified Raman spectra. For instance, FP and HW Raman spectroscopy misclassified 85 and 136 spectra, respectively, from the 11 and 23 patients recruited, in which 9 misclassified patients were identical in both the modalities. The integrated FP/HW Raman technique reduced the number of misclassified patients to 4 (25 spectra). Hence, the complementary biochemical/biomolecular information harvested by the simultaneous FP/HW Raman spectroscopy could greatly improve the in vivo diagnosis of ESCC at endoscopy. Furthermore, misclassified spectra by the FP Raman (that were correctly classified by the integrated FP/HW Raman) are comprised of weaker tissue Raman signals and relatively high AF background; while the addition of the HW Raman containing stronger tissue Raman peaks (e.g., 2885, 2940, 3250 and 3400 cm−1) but much reduced AF could improve the overall signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of integrated FP/HW Raman spectra, therefore, enhancing the performance of classification. In addition, prospective study on the independent testing dataset (20% of the total dataset) (see Supplementary Figs. S2-S3 online) shows that the integrated FP/HW Raman spectroscopy could provide a predication accuracy of 93.2% (218/234) for ESCC identification. The above results affirm that the integrated FP/HW Raman spectroscopy could be a potent optical diagnostics means to revealing comprehensive but complementary endogenous biomolecular information of epithelial tissue, thereby enhancing in vivo objective diagnosis of esophageal neoplasia.

The introduction of FP/HW Raman spectroscopy could have a major impact on current endoscopic practice and decision making by providing objective real-time diagnosis. Several clinical scenarios exist for the applications of FP/HW Raman spectroscopy during clinical endoscopic examinations. One scenario is for the screening and surveillance. FP/HW Raman spectroscopy can be used by the endoscopists as a guiding tool to reduce negative biopsy numbers by objectively evaluating wide lesion regions in real-time without extensive excisional biopsies of the tissues, reducing the risk and the cost of the procedure. Further, the individual patients having higher risk of developing ESCC could be identified by Raman spectroscopy for quick surveillance and examination at endoscopy. Therefore, FP/HW Raman spectroscopy is expected to provide a greater opportunity for curative treatment with improved patient outcome. In another scenario of interventional procedures, FP/HW Raman spectroscopy could be used to assist in determining the lesion margins during endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedures for the treatment of ESCC34,35. The FP/HW Raman spectroscopy system developed is now routinely used by both experienced and novice endoscopists without any difficulty at Endoscope Center at the National University Health System, Singapore for screening esophageal patients for targeted biopsies. Considering its encouraging diagnostic performance (Fig. 4(c)), fiber-optic FP/HW Raman spectroscopy has promise to become one part of routine endoscopic practices. Currently, clinical trials on a larger series of esophageal patients based on the simultaneous FP/HW Raman spectroscopy technique are in progress to further assess its clinical merits for precancer and early cancer diagnosis in the esophagus.

In summary, we demonstrate that the simultaneous FP/HW in vivo Raman spectra of esophageal tissue can be acquired in real-time during clinical endoscopic examination. Significant FP/HW Raman spectral differences between ESCC and normal esophageal tissue are observed. The use of complementary biomolecular information harvested through the integrated FP/HW Raman spectroscopy significantly enhances the detection and diagnosis of esophageal neoplasia as compared to either the FP or HW Raman technique alone. This unique biomolecular endoscopic approach based on the simultaenous FP/HW Raman spectroscopy could open a new avenue for objective diagnosis of esophageal neoplasia in vivo at the molecular level.

Methods

Raman Instrumentation

The Raman fiber-optic simultaneous FP and HW spectroscopy platform developed for in vivo tissue Raman measurements at endoscopy consists of a 785 nm diode laser (maximum output: 300 mW, B&W TEK Inc.), a high-throughput reflective imaging spectrograph (Acton LS-785 f/2, Princeton Instruments Inc.) equipped with a customised 830 gr/mm gold-coated grating that has a ~85% diffraction efficiency in the NIR range of 800–1200 nm. A thermo electric-cooled (−70 °C), NIR-optimised deep-depletion charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (PIXIS 400BR-eXcelon, Princeton Instruments Inc.) was used to collect the FP/HW Raman signals. A customised parabolic-aligned fiber bundle (64 × 100 μm fibers, numerical aperture (NA) = 0.22) was coupled into the entrance slit to compensate for the image aberration in the broad spectral range (800–3600 cm−1)17,36, which significantly improves the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) (20-fold improvement) as well as the spectral resolution (~9 cm−1) of the Raman system as compared to a conventional straight slit imaging spectrograph. A depth-selective bevelled fiber-optic Raman endoscopic probe (1.8 mm in outer diameter) compatible with most medical endoscopes was developed for in vivo tissue Raman measurements at endoscopy. The customised Raman endoscopic probe comprises central light delivery fiber (200 μmin in diameter, NA = 0.22) surrounded by 18 bevelled collection fibers (200 μm in diameter, NA = 0.22). A 1.0 mm sapphire ball lens (NA = 1.78) is further coupled to the fiber tip of the probe to focus the excitation light onto the tissue surface37. Monte Carlo simulation shows that ~85% of the total Raman signal collected by the bevelled fiber-optic Raman endoscopic probe is arising from the top ~300 μm esophageal layer with an estimated tissue probing volume of ~0.017 mm3; whereas ~15% of the Raman collection is from the stromal layer (~300-800) μm of the esophageal tissue with an estimated tissue probing volume of ~0.003 mm3, facilitating the in vivo detection of esophageal early cancer and precancer37.The 785-nm laser excitation power is ~12 mW on the tissue, which is less than the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) maximum permissible skin exposure limit set out for a 785-nm laser beam38. Further finite difference thermal modeling39,40 based on the optical properties of esophageal tissue41,42 shows that even without consideration of other cooling effects (e.g., perfusion and evaporation in tissue), the maximum tissue temperature rise is only about 0.07 °C after 1-min of 785-nm laser radiation with an incident power density of ~1.5 W/cm2 during tissue Raman measurements. This temperature rise estimated is far below the level to cause photothermal damage to tissue and cells43, suggesting that the laser power used in this study is safe for in vivo tissue Raman measurements. The system was wavelength-calibrated using a mercury/argon calibration lamp (HG-1 and AR-1, Ocean Optics Inc., Dunedin, FL) in the FP range, and 4-acetamidophenol that exhibits strong well-defined peaks in the HW region at 2931 cm−1 and 3064 cm−1 (ASTM E1840 standard) is used for the HW wavelength calibration. The spectral response correction for the wavelength-calibrated system was conducted using a standard lamp (RS-10, EG&G Gamma Scientific, San Diego, CA)44. The raw FP/HW Raman spectra measured from in vivo esophageal tissue represent a combination of weak tissue Raman scattering, intense AF background and the noise. The raw spectra are preprocessed by a third-order Savitzky-Golay smoothing filter (a window width of 3 pixels) to remove the spectral noise. In the FP region (800–1800 cm−1), a fifth-order polynomial was found to be optimal for fitting the AF background in the noise-smoothed spectrum and this polynomial was then subtracted from the measured FP spectrum to yield the FP tissue Raman spectrum alone. In the HW range (2800–3600 cm−1), a first-order polynomial fit was used for removing the AF background. The tissue FP/HW Raman spectrum was finally normalised to the integrated area of the entire FP and HW range, enabling a better comparison of the spectral shapes and relative Raman band intensities between ESCC and normal esophagus. All the preprocessing is completed within 0.5 sec, and the processed Raman spectra and diagnostic outcomes can be displayed on the computer screen in real-time by using the house-developed online Raman software44.

Clinical trial protocol

The ethical protocol of the present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the National Healthcare Group (NHG) of Singapore. Prior to Raman measurements, all patients (21 to 80 years old) signed an informed consent permitting in vivo Raman spectroscopic measurements during endoscope examinations. The trial has been registered (registration number: ISRCTN15587241) on June 23, 2015 into ISRCTN registry (http://www.isrctn.com/), which is a publicly accessible primary register that participates in the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trial Registry Platform. Also, the trial was performed in accordance with International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) for Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines, Declaration of Helsinki (2000). A total of 48 esophageal patients (31 men and 17 women with mean ages of 51) were enrolled in the gastrointestinal Raman endoscopic examinations for various esophageal indications (e.g., anemia, bleeding, eating problems, pain etc.). One notes that the patients presenting with co-morbid diseases, severe acute/chronic medical conditions or bleeding disorders, in which biopsies may be contraindicated were excluded from this study. During endoscopic examination of suspicious lesions, the Raman probe was placed in gentle contact with the esophageal mucosa surface, and the positioning of the Raman probe against the tissue sites was verified on the computer monitor by the endoscopists in-charge at endoscopy. Multiple spectra (8-10) for each tissue site were measured with scanning times of 0.1 to 0.5 sec, which permits a rapid survey of large tissue areas. Raman spectra acquired in non-contact with esophageal tissues were automatically discarded online using Raman diagnostic software developed by our group44. A total of 1172 FP/HW esophageal Raman spectra (normal (n = 938) and ESCC (n = 234)) were successfully acquired in vivo from 101 tissue sites. Immediately after the tissue Raman acquisitions, each tissue site measured was biopsied and sent for histopathological examination by three senior gastrointestinal pathologists who were blinded to the Raman scans. The histopathology assessments serve as the gold standard to determine the diagnostic performance of the simultaneous FP/HW fiber-optic Raman technique for identifying ESCC from normal esophageal tissues.

Statistical Analysis

Cohen’s κ statistics were calculated to examine the agreement among the pathologists29. The unpaired two-sided Student’s t-test was used to evaluate Raman spectral differences between ESCC and normal esophagus15. Mean-centering was performed prior to multivariate statistical analysis to remove common variance from the dataset of in vivo esophageal tissue Raman spectra. Partial least squares (PLS)- discriminant analysis (DA) was further applied for tissue diagnosis model development45. PLS-DA employs the fundamental principle of PCA but further rotates the components (latent variables (LVs)) by maximizing the covariance between the spectral variation and group affinity, so that the LVs explain the diagnostic relevant variations rather than the most prominent variations in the spectral dataset45. Leave-one-patient out, cross-validation was used to assess and optimize the PLS-DA model complexity, while reducing the risk of overfitting45. The overall discriminatory accuracy of the FP, HW, and integrated FP/HW diagnostic models were further evaluated through the use of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis45,46. The PLS-DA model developed was further applied to an independent validation dataset to evaluate the predictive diagnostic performance of the integrated FP/HW Raman spectroscopy technique for ESCC identification. The above multivariate statistical analysis was performed using in-house written scripts in the Matlab programming environment.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Wang, J. et al. Simultaneous fingerprint and high-wavenumber fiber-optic Raman spectroscopy improves in vivo diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma at endoscopy. Sci. Rep. 5, 12957; doi: 10.1038/srep12957 (2015).

References

  1. 1.

    , , , & Global cancer transitions according to the Human Development Index (2008—2030): a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 13, 790–801(2012).

  2. 2.

    , , & Cancer statistics, 2014.CA CANCER J CLIN 64, 9–29 (2014).

  3. 3.

    & Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 349, 2241–2252 (2003).

  4. 4.

    , & New optical technologies for earlier endoscopic diagnosis of premalignant gastrointestinal lesions. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 17, S85–104 (2002).

  5. 5.

    et al. Evaluation of in vivo endoscopic autofluorescence spectroscopy in gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 59, 191–198 (2004).

  6. 6.

    et al. Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy of human adenomatous colon polyps in vivo. Appl Opt. 38, 6628–6637(1999).

  7. 7.

    et al. Fiber-optic confocal Raman spectroscopy for real-time in vivo diagnosis of dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterol 146, 27–32 (2014).

  8. 8.

    et al. In vivo bladder cancer diagnosis by high-volume Raman spectroscopy. Anal Chem. 8 2, 5993–5999 (2010).

  9. 9.

    et al. Near-infrared Raman spectroscopy for optical diagnosis in the stomach: Identification of Helicobacter-pylori infection and intestinal metaplasia. Int. J. Cancer 126, 1920–1927 (2010)

  10. 10.

    et al. Near-infrared Raman spectroscopy for optical diagnosis of lung cancer. Int J Cancer 107, 1047–1052 (2003).

  11. 11.

    , , & Study of fiber-optic probes for in vivo medical Raman spectroscopy. Appl Spectrosc 53, 619–627 (1999).

  12. 12.

    et al. Optical fiber probe for biomedical Raman spectroscopy. Appl Opt. 4 3, 542–554 (2004).

  13. 13.

    , , & Micro-optical fiber probe for use in an intravascular Raman endoscope. Appl Opt 44, 4722–4732 (2005).

  14. 14.

    et al. A miniature confocal Raman probe for endoscopic use. Phys Med Biol 54, 7077–7087 (2009).

  15. 15.

    et al. Diagnostic potential of near-infrared Raman spectroscopy in the stomach: differentiating dysplasia from normal tissue. Br J Cancer 98, 457–465 (2008).

  16. 16.

    et al. Raman spectroscopy: a potential tool for early objective diagnosis of neoplasia in the oesophagus. J Biophotonics 10, 685–695 (2011).

  17. 17.

    et al. Integrated Raman spectroscopy and trimodal wide-field imaging techniques for real-time in vivo tissue Raman measurements at endoscopy. Opt Lett 34, 758–760 (2009).

  18. 18.

    et al. In vivo diagnosis of esophageal cancer using image-guided Raman endoscopy and biomolecular modeling. TCRT 10, 103–112 (2011).

  19. 19.

    , , , & Fiber-optic probes for in vivo Raman spectroscopy in the high-wavenumber region. Anal Chem 77, 6747–6752 (2005).

  20. 20.

    et al. Tissue characterization using high wave number Raman spectroscopy. J Biomed Opt 10, 031116 (2005).

  21. 21.

    et al. High wavenumber Raman spectroscopy for in vivo detection of cervical dysplasia. Anal Chem 81, 8908–8915 (2009).

  22. 22.

    , & Optical diagnosis of laryngeal cancer using high wavenumber Raman spectroscopy. Biosens Bioelectron 35, 213–217(2012).

  23. 23.

    et al. Simultaneous fingerprint and high-wavenumber confocal Raman spectroscopy enhances early detection of cervical precancer in vivo. Anal Chem 84, 5913–5919(2012).

  24. 24.

    et al. Characterizing Variability of In Vivo Raman Spectroscopic Properties of Different Anatomical Sites of Normal Colorectal Tissue towards Cancer Diagnosis at Colonoscopy. Anal Chem. 87, 960–966(2015).

  25. 25.

    et al. Simultaneous fingerprint and high-wavenumber fiber-optic Raman spectroscopy enhances real-time in vivo diagnosis of adenomatous polyps during colonoscopy. J Biophotonics, 10.1002/jbio.201400141 (2015)

  26. 26.

    & A new type of secondary radiation. Nature 121, 501–502 (1928).

  27. 27.

    et al. Determination of water concentration in brain tissue by Raman spectroscopy. Anal Chem 73, 3915–3920 (2001).

  28. 28.

    et al. Discrimination between Oral Cancer and Healthy Tissue Based on Water Content Determined by Raman Spectroscopy. Anal Chem 87, 2419–2426(2015).

  29. 29.

    Assessing agreement on classification tasks: the kappa statistic. Comput Linguist 22, 249–254 (1996).

  30. 30.

    et al. Accuracy of staging in early oesophageal cancer using high resolution endoscopy and high resolution endosonography: a comparative, prospective, and blinded trial, Gut 53, 634–640 (2004).

  31. 31.

    et al. Expression of IAP family proteins in esophageal cancer., Exp Mol Pathol 76, 253–259 (2004).

  32. 32.

    , , & Raman spectral evidence for hydration forces between collagen triple helices. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94, 11312–11317 (1997).

  33. 33.

    et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early esophageal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3, S67–S70 (2005).

  34. 34.

    & Endoscopic detection of early upper GI cancers. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 19, 833–856 (2005).

  35. 35.

    et al. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Esophageal Squamous Cell Neoplasms. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 4, 688–694 (2006).

  36. 36.

    , , , & Rapid near-infrared Raman spectroscopy system for real-time in vivo skin measurements. Opt Lett 26, 1782–1784 (2001).

  37. 37.

    , , & Development of a beveled fiber-optic confocal Raman probe for enhancing in vivo epithelial tissue Raman measurements at endoscopy. Opt Lett 38, 2321–2323 (2013).

  38. 38.

    American National Standards Institute, American National Standard for the Safe Use of Lasers. ANSI Standard 2136.1-1986, Washington, D.C., 1986.

  39. 39.

    , , & Experimental evaluation of mathematical models for predicting the thermal response of tissue to laser irradiation. Appl. Opt. 32, 597–606 (1993)

  40. 40.

    & Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1990.

  41. 41.

    et al. Optical properties of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction. J. Biomed. Opt. 12, 014025 (2007)

  42. 42.

    et al. Monte Carlo model to describe depth selective fluorescence spectra of epithelial tissue. J. Biomed. Opt. 13, 064012 (2008)

  43. 43.

    Pathologic analysis of photothermal and photomechanical effects of laser-tissue interactions. Photochem. Photobiol. 53, 825–835 (1991)

  44. 44.

    et al. Real-time Raman spectroscopy for in vivo, online gastric cancer diagnosis during clinical endoscopic examination. J Biomed Opt 17, 081418 (2012).

  45. 45.

    et al. Raman endoscopy for in vivo differentiation between benign and malignant ulcers in the stomach. Analyst 135, 3162–3168 (2010).

  46. 46.

    & The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143, 29–36 (1982).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Medical Research Council (NMRC) (NMRC/CIRG/1331/2012; BnB13dec037; BNB/0012c/2014), the National Research Foundation-Proof-of-Concept (NRF-POC) (NRF2014NRF-POC001-012), and the Academic Research Fund (AcRF)-Tier 2 from the Ministry of Education (MOE) (MOE2014-T2-1-010), Singapore.

Author information

Author notes

    • Jianfeng Wang
    • , Kan Lin
    • , Wei Zheng
    •  & Zhiwei Huang

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Optical Bioimaging Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576

    • Jianfeng Wang
    • , Kan Lin
    • , Wei Zheng
    •  & Zhiwei Huang
  2. Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore 119260

    • Khek Yu Ho
    •  & Khay Guan Yeoh
  3. Department of Pathology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore 119074.

    • Ming Teh

Authors

  1. Search for Jianfeng Wang in:

  2. Search for Kan Lin in:

  3. Search for Wei Zheng in:

  4. Search for Khek Yu Ho in:

  5. Search for Ming Teh in:

  6. Search for Khay Guan Yeoh in:

  7. Search for Zhiwei Huang in:

Contributions

J.W. was involved in Raman data acquisition and analysis, and manuscript drafting. K.L. was involved in the probe design and system development, data collection and manuscript revision. W.Z. was involved in Raman system design, clinical design, data collection and manuscript revision. K.Y.H. was involved in study design and clinical endoscopy. M.T. conducted histopathological examinations. K.G.Y. was involved in study design and clinical endoscopy. Z.H. was involved in the entire Raman instrumentation design and development, study design, data analysis and manuscript drafting and finalization.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiwei Huang.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12957

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.