Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Comparative Study of Outcomes among Patients with Polycystic Kidney Disease on Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis

Abstract

Polycystic kidney disease (PCKD) is the most common hereditary cause of end-stage renal disease, the complications of which may prevent the choice of peritoneal dialysis (PD). The aim of this study was to explore the effects of dialysis modality on outcomes in patients with PCKD. We extracted a cohort of 1417 adult patients with PCKD initiating long-term dialysis therapy in 1999–2010 from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, among which 125 patients chose PD. The patients on HD were older and had a higher comorbidity index compared to those on PD. We compared the risks for death, hospitalization and medical expenditures between the patients on PD and propensity-score matched patients on hemodialysis (HD). The overall survival did not differ between the patients on PD and HD. The patients on PD tended to have higher hazard ratios (HR) for the first episode of hospitalization (adjusted HR 1.34 [95% CI, 1.04−1.79]). The annual medical expenses were 10% lower for the patients on PD. PD is an equivalent choice of renal replacement therapy to HD for patients with PCKD in terms of survival. Although the patients on PD had a higher risk for hospitalization, the medical expenditure for PD was 10% lower.

Introduction

Polycystic kidney disease (PCKD) is the most common hereditary cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), affecting around 500,000 persons in the United States and 4 to 6 million worldwide1. As the kidney cysts grow, 45% of patients will progress to ESRD by the age of 60 and up to 75% by the age of 702. PCKD accounts for 8 to 10% of ESRD patients in Western countries3,4 and costs for its treatment have been reported to exceed 1.5 billion euro a year4. Despite multiple extra-renal complications, patients with PCKD have more favorable outcomes after ESRD compared with their counterparts with other causes of kidney failure5,6.

Based on ethical considerations, it is not possible to conduct a randomized controlled study to compare outcomes between patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD), thus, there is a lack of convincing evidence on which dialysis modality is better for patients with ESRD. In most western countries, patients with ESRD were under free will to choose dialysis modality. The complications of PCKD such as enlarged kidneys and liver, diverticulosis and the development of hernias or vascular aneurysms may theoretically prevent the choice of PD among patients with ESRD and PCKD. However, the technical survivals, quality of dialysis, duration of therapy and rates of complications for PD have been reported to be comparable in both patients with and without PCKD7,8,9. In addition, PD has been reported to be more frequently used and to be associated with a significantly better adjusted survival in patients with ESRD and PCKD than in those with other causes of ESRD in the United States10,11. However, evidence about direct comparisons of outcomes between patients with PCKD on PD and HD is still lacking.

The clinical diagnosis for PCKD usually relies on examination of family history and imaging studies. As PCKD is a relatively rare disease with a slow progression, it is expected that a study on this disease in a single center would only be able to enroll a small number of patients6,8,9. Using healthcare administrative data to conduct research on PCKD would therefore be a preferable, economical approach, which could also provide highly reliable information on the prognosis and treatment effects regarding PCKD5,10,11,12. Using this rationale, we investigated the outcomes of patients with ESRD and PCKD using the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan. We compared the overall survival, hospitalization risk and medical expenditure between patients with PCKD on PD and HD.

Results

The patient selection flowchart is shown in Fig. 1. The prevalence of PCKD among the patients with ESRD in Taiwan is around 1.9%. We identified1417 patients with PCKD who initiated long-term dialysis during 1999–2010, among whom125 (8.8%) received PD. The patients on HD were older and had a higher comorbidity index compared to the patients on PD (Table 1). The median follow-up period was 3.6 years. The 1- and 5-year mortality rates after ESRD among the patients with PCKD were 8.1% and 25.2%,respectively. There was an increasing trend regarding the incident age of ESRD(mean age 55.0 in 1999 and 59.5 in 2010; p value for trend: 0.01) and the percentage of patients choosing PD as the dialysis modality among the patients with PCKD (4.2% in 1999 and 10.4% in 2010, p value for trend: 0.02)during 1999 to 2010.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of incident long-term dialysis (>90 days) adult patients with polycystic kidney disease (>=20 years) during 1999–2010.
Figure 1
figure1

Flowchart of patient selection.

The characteristics of the PS-matched patients with PCKD on PD and HD are shown in Table 2. The overall survival of the patients with PCKD on PD were better compared with those on HD among the total PCKD population before adjustments (data not shown). However, in the PS-matched analysis, the overall survival rates did not differ between the patients on PD and HD, regardless of whether or not a switch in treatment modality was censored (Fig. 2).

Table 2 Baseline characteristics of propensity-score matched patients with polycystic kidney disease on peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis.
Figure 2
figure2

Survival curves between the patients with polycystic kidney disease on peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis.

Around 70% of the patients with PCKD on dialysis experienced at least one hospitalization during the follow-up period (Table 3). The patients on PD had around 35% higher risk for the first episode of hospitalization (Fig. 3). However, after taking repeated hospitalizations into consideration, the rates of hospitalization were not significantly different between the patients undergoing PD and HD based on intention to treat analysis (Table 3). The number of hospitalizations with intensive care unit stay, length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality rate were similar between the patients on PD and HD. The patients on PD had a higher rate of infection-related hospitalizations(58.2% vs. 44.7%, p = 0.02, based on intention to treat analysis).

Table 3 Risks for hospitalization between patients with polycystic kidney disease on peritoneal dialysis and propensity-scored matched hemodialysis patients.
Figure 3
figure3

Survival curves regarding the incidence of a first episode of hospitalization among the patients with polycystic kidney disease on peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis.

The medical expenses were significantly lower for the patients on PD (Table 4). The median annual cost of PD per patient was approximately NT$610,100 and the annual cost of HD wasapproximatelyNT$681,300. After excluding healthcare costs in the last 3 months of life, the annual expenditure of PD remained 10% lower than that for HD. The difference mainly came from outpatient care costs.

Table 4 Medical expenditure comparison between patients with polycystic kidney disease on peritoneal dialysis and propensity-scored matched patients on hemodialysis.

With regards to subgroup analysis (Fig. 4), we did not find and significant interactions between age or incident calendar year and modality for risk of death or hospitalization. The frequency of hernia requiring surgical intervention, subarachnoid hemrrhage or non-dialysis outpatients visits did not differ (Table 5).

Table 5 Other outcome comparisons between patients with polycystic kidney disease on peritoneal dialysis and propensity-scored matched patients on hemodialysis.
Figure 4
figure4

Subgroup analysis by age and incident year.

Discussion

There are numerous studies addressing survival after renal replacement therapy in patients with PCKD4,6,8,9,10,11, however, the observation of outcomes between dialysis modalities were unavoidably subject to selection bias. This is the first study aimed to compare survival, hospitalization risk and medical expenditure of patients with PCKD on PD and HD. We found comparable risks for death after adjustments for selection bias between the patients on PD and HD. Despite a slightly higher risk for hospitalizations among the patients on PD, the overall medical expenses were over 10% lower for the patients on PD even after PS-matched comparisons.

The theoretical concerns over intra-abdominal complications of PCKD did not appear to prevent patients choosing PD as the dialysis modality; on the contrary, the proportion of patients with PCKD choosing PD was higher than those without PCKD13. In this cohort, the timing of pre-dialysis nephrologist referral and economic status were not significant factors when choosing the modality in the PCKD cohort. Healthier and younger patients with PCKD tended to choose PD, whereas those with hypertension, heart disease, or cerebral vascular disease were less likely to select PD (Table 1). Therefore, it is not surprising that the statistical results without adequately adjusting for self-selection showed a better outcome and higher chance of kidney transplantation for the PD patients3,4,6,10,11. In PS-matched analysis, the patients with PCKD on HD did not have a higher risk of overall mortality, regardless of the age group or incident era of dialysis.

Hospitalization rate is an important indicator for economic burden and quality of life. Previous comparisons in patients with ESRD14,15,16 reported that patients on PD are at a higher risk of hospitalization than patients on HD and especially infection-related hospitalizations16. This difference has been decreasing due to an increasing rate of infection-related hospitalizations among patients on HD13. In concordance with the observation from general ESRD population, there is also a slightly higher risk for infection related hospitalization among the patients on PD (Table 3) and an insignificant trend to favor PD after 2005 for risk of hospitalization in this PCKD cohort (Fig. 4). Probably due to the relatively small number of cases, we could not conclude whether the relative risk for hospitalization between the patients on PD and HD varied over time from the subgroup analysis. As for the severity of hospitalization, indicated by hospitalization with intensive care unit stay, length of stay and in-hospital mortality, there was no obvious difference between the patients on PD and HD.

Despite the marginally higher risk of hospitalization for the patients on PD, the overall medical expenditure of the patients on PD was 10% lower than that for those on HD. Although the costs are based on payment schedule in Taiwan, the finding is consistent with previous cost analysis between patients on PD and HD among other ESRD populations17,18,19. The differences mainly stemmed from cheaper outpatient care for the patients on PD and this persisted within PS-matched comparison regardless of whether or not the healthcare costs in the last 3 months of life were taken into account. Although interesting, how PCKD impacts the medical costs of patients on dialysis is beyond the scope of this study.

There are several limitations to this study. As mentioned, an observational cohort cannot completely avoid the concern of selection bias. Although we applied a PS-matched method to deal with the selection bias, we could not find a comparable match for 5 (5%)patients on PD. It would raise concerns about the generalization of the results and insufficiency of power. In addition, patients on either modality is not the same as "patient choice" of the modality. For example, there are potentially many patients that chose PD initially and could not continue due to limitations with catheter placement. Other concerns with administrative claims data include reasonable doubts about the definition of cases and events, a lack of laboratory data such as sonography reports, dialysis adequacy and direct measurements of quality of life. Furthermore, the conclusions are based on practice patterns in Taiwan and which might vary between healthcare systems.

Methods

Data source and quality

The NHIRD contains de-identified registration files and origin claim data for reimbursements from the Taiwan NHI program. For a project on diseases in kidneys and the brain, the National Health Research Institutes (NHRI) of Taiwan have used the NHIRD to construct a cohort of two million patients who ever used dialysis care, or ever had major diagnoses on chronic kidney disease (CKD) , acute kidney injury (AKI) or severe neurological diseases between 1997 and 2011. To comply with an NHIA policy that regulates the maximal proportion of data extracted from the population data, the NHRI set the number of patients at 2 million. The cohort is a random sample from all individuals having aforementioned conditions or diagnoses and the sampling fraction was as high as 71%. Each patient’s longitudinal registration and claims data for 1997-2011 were collected.

The quality of NHI data has been recognized and the data have been used in many projects on clinical epidemiology and health services research20. The reliability of NHI data has been demonstrated in a body of literature on validation of specific disease diagnoses in the NHI data21,22,23. Because the NHIA has an auditing system for preventing fraud, the quality of NHI records is also guaranteed in regard to expensive procedures and health services, as well as medications24. The NHIA also operates an auditing system for the NHI catastrophic illness registry system, because enrollees in this special system receive additional benefits in healthcare.

Study population

On the basis of the cohort with 2-million patients, we further constructed a sample for the study. Adult patients (>=20 years old) who initiated maintenance dialysis for more than 3 months during 1999 to 2010 were included, to allow at least 1year of observation after the event and at least 2years before the event for each patient. Individuals who received PD 2 to 4 months after the initiation of dialysis were defined as the PD cohort, regardless of whether they changed the modality at a later date.

We identified patients with PCKD registered with a catastrophic illness with an ICD-9-CM diagnostic code of 753.1X (cystic kidney disease). Patients with PCKD are eligible to register with the catastrophic illness registry in Taiwan, however registration is not required. Therefore, we also defined patients with PCKD by specific ICD-9-CM codes 753.12 (polycystic kidney, unspecified type) or 753.13 (polycystic kidney, autosomal dominant) from at least three outpatient claims or at least one inpatient claim during 1997–2011.

Study outcomes

The primary outcome of interest was mortality. The date of death was defined from records in the registry of catastrophic illnesses or the discharge status (death or critically ill discharge). Patients were defined as being lost to follow-up if there were no registry records or claims records for more than 1 year.

The secondary outcomes included risk for hospitalization of any cause, incidence of subarachnoid hemorrhage and abdominal hernia requiring surgical intervention. We further examined the severity of hospitalization as indicated by the length of stay, intensive care unit stay, in-hospital mortality and infection-related hospitalization, in particular abdominal infections.

We calculated the average annual expenditure of each patient after the initiation of dialysis, excluding the healthcare costs in the last 3 months of life and extracting expenses for inpatient and outpatient care. We calculated the expenditure according to the payment schedule of the NHI global budgeting system based on the Consumer Price Index of Taiwan. All expenditures were expressed in Taiwan dollars based on the value in31 December 2013 when the exchange rate to one US dollar was 29.997.

Candidate predictors

In addition to age and sex, we recorded the socioeconomic status from the registry data within 6 months of the initiation of PD. Socioeconomic status was classified into three groups according to insurance premium levels.

We ascertained 12 comorbidities from both inpatient and outpatient claims of the 2 years before the initiation of dialysis, including diabetes, heart failure, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebral vascular disease, hypertension, arrhythmia, valvular heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, chronic liver disease, dyslipidemia and gout. We calculated Deyo’s Charlson comorbidity index25 according to claims data 2 years before the initiation of dialysis. Late referral to a nephrologist referred to a duration between the first nephrologist visit to dialysis of less than 180 days.

Statistical analysis

We used the Student’s t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare continuous variables and the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test and Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel (CMH) test for categorical variables, accordingly. For expense data, we used logarithmic transformations before comparisons. Since the dialysis modality was not randomly assigned, we performed propensity-score (PS) matching analysis to adjust for self-selection. The logistic regression model to calculate the PS and some diagnostic analyses were shown in Appendix. We performed the analysis both based on intention to treat (regardless of whether the dialysis modality was switched or not during the follow-up period) and considering modality switch as censoring.

We used Cox regression models to evaluate the associations among potential risk factors and event free survival. We reported logit PS adjusted risk ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each factor. For analyses based on intention to treat, patients were censored after successful renal transplantation, if they were lost to follow-up, or on December 31, 2010. We performed sensitivity analyses by additionally censoring the modality switch. We grasped the interval when the patients were temporary on another dialysis modality for less than 60 days. Only those patients who shifted to another modality for more than 60 days were censored. We also performed sensitivity analyses considering renal transplantation as a competing event, which did not materially changed the results (see Appendix).

Considering hospitalizations as a recurrent outcome, we used a negative binomial model to estimate the relative risk for hospitalization adjusted to the length of time for observation.

We performed subgroup analysis by age and calendar year to evaluate potential effect modifiers between modalities and outcomes. We divided the population before and after 2005 as icodextrin was covered by the NHI program in Taiwan in 2005.

All analyses were performed using SAS software version 9.3 (The SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).

This study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of National Taiwan University Hospital. The methods were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines. Informed consent was waived because the dataset is encrypted and de-identified.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the cohort in this study is the largest published cohort of Asian patients with PCKD on dialysis with longitudinal follow-up over 12 years from a reliable national dataset. PD was an equivalent choice of renal replacement therapy to HD for the patients with PCKD in terms of overall survival. Although the patients with PCKD on PD had a slightly higher risk for hospitalization, the medical expenditure of the patients on PD was 10% lower based on the payment schedule in Taiwan.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Yang, J.-Y. et al. Comparative Study of Outcomes among Patients with Polycystic Kidney Disease on Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis. Sci. Rep. 5, 12816; doi: 10.1038/srep12816 (2015).

References

  1. Wilson, P. D. Polycystic kidney disease. The New England journal of medicine 350, 151–164 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gabow, P. A. et al. Factors affecting the progression of renal disease in autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease. Kidney international 41, 1311–1319 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Perrone, R. D., Ruthazer, R. & Terrin, N. C. Survival after end-stage renal disease in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: contribution of extrarenal complications to mortality. American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation 38, 777–784 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Spithoven, E. M. et al. Renal replacement therapy for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) in Europe: prevalence and survival—an analysis of data from the ERA-EDTA Registry. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association 29 Suppl 4, iv15–iv25 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. van Walraven, C., Manuel, D. G. & Knoll, G. Survival trends in ESRD patients compared with the general population in the United States. American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation 63, 491–499 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Haynes, R., Kheradmand, F. & Winearls, C. G. Survival after starting renal replacement treatment in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a single-centre 40-year study. Nephron. Clinical practice 120, c42–c47 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Prischl, F. C. et al.Peritoneal dialysis in patients with polycystic kidney disease. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 117 Suppl 6, 24–28 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li, L. et al. Peritoneal dialysis as the first-line renal replacement therapy in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation 57, 903–907 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumar, S., Fan, S. L., Raftery, M. J. & Yaqoob, M. M. Long term outcome of patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney diseases receiving peritoneal dialysis. Kidney international 74, 946–951 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abbott, K. C. & Agodoa, L. Y. Polycystic kidney disease at end-stage renal disease in the United States: patient characteristics and survival. Clinical nephrology 57, 208–214 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reule, S. et al. ESRD from autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease in the United States, 2001-2010. American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation 64, 592–599 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee, P. W., Chien, C. C., Yang, W. C., Wang, J. J. & Lin, C. C. Epidemiology and mortality in dialysis patients with and without polycystic kidney disease: a national study in Taiwan. Journal of nephrology 26, 755–762 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Collins, A. J. et al. US Renal Data System 2013 Annual Data Report. American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation 63, A7 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Murphy, S. W. et al. Comparative hospitalization of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients in Canada. Kidney international 57, 2557–2563 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lafrance, J. P. et al. Association of dialysis modality with risk for infection-related hospitalization: a propensity score-matched cohort analysis. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN 7, 1598–1605 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar, V. A., Ledezma, M. L., Idroos, M. L., Burchette, R. J. & Rasgon, S. A. Hospitalization rates in daily home hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis patients in the United States. American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation 52, 737–744 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shih, Y. C., Guo, A., Just, P. M. & Mujais, S. Impact of initial dialysis modality and modality switches on Medicare expenditures of end-stage renal disease patients. Kidney international 68, 319–329 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee, H. et al. Cost analysis of ongoing care of patients with end-stage renal disease: the impact of dialysis modality and dialysis access. American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation 40, 611–622 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kao, T. W. et al. Lifetime costs for peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in patients in Taiwan. Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis 33, 671–678 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yeh, H.-Y., Wu, J.-C., Haschler, I., Chen, T.-J. & Wetter, T. Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database: administrative health care database as study object in bibliometrics. Scientometrics 86, 365–380 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu, V. C. et al. Administrative data on diagnosis and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist prescription identified patients with primary aldosteronism in Taiwan. Journal of clinical epidemiology 67, 1139–1149 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lin, C. C., Lai, M. S., Syu, C. Y., Chang, S. C. & Tseng, F. Y. Accuracy of diabetes diagnosis in health insurance claims data in Taiwan. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi 104, 157–163 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cheng, C. L., Kao, Y. H., Lin, S. J., Lee, C. H. & Lai, M. L. Validation of the National Health Insurance Research Database with ischemic stroke cases in Taiwan. Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety 20, 236–242 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu, V. C. et al. Long-term risk of coronary events after AKI. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN 25, 595–605 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Quan, H. et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Medical care 43, 1130–1139 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by National Taiwan University Hospital, National Health Research Institutes of Taiwan and Far Eastern Memorial Hospital. The study is based on data provided by National Health Insurance Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare and managed by the National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan. The interpretation and conclusions shown in this paper do not represent those of National Health Research Institutes, or National Health Insurance Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan. The authors would like to thank Ms. Ling-Ya Huang, the staff of the Health Data Research Center in National Taiwan University for technical assistance.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Huang J.W. and Hung K.Y. developed the initial study concept, which was then refined by the remaining authors. Yang J.Y. and Chen L. had full access to all of the data and were responsible for statistical analysis. Yang J.Y. wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. Chao C.T., Peng Y.S., Chiang C.K., Kao T.W., Chien K.L. and Wu H.Y. contributed to the editing of the manuscript and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, JY., Chen, L., Chao, CT. et al. Comparative Study of Outcomes among Patients with Polycystic Kidney Disease on Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis. Sci Rep 5, 12816 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12816

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing