Article | Open Access | Published:

Coupled ferroelectric polarization and magnetization in spinel FeCr2S4

Scientific Reports volume 4, Article number: 6530 (2014) | Download Citation

Abstract

One of the core issues for multiferroicity is the strongly coupled ferroelectric polarization and magnetization, while so far most multiferroics have antiferromagnetic order with nearly zero magnetization. Magnetic spinel compounds with ferrimagnetic order may be alternative candidates offering large magnetization when ferroelectricity can be activated simultaneously. In this work, we investigate the ferroelectricity and magnetism of spinel FeCr2S4 in which the Fe2+ sublattice and Cr3+ sublattice are coupled in antiparallel alignment. Well defined ferroelectric transitions below the Fe2+ orbital ordering termperature Too = 8.5 K are demonstrated. The ferroelectric polarization has two components. One component arises mainly from the noncollinear conical spin order associated with the spin-orbit coupling, which is thus magnetic field sensitive. The other is probably attributed to the Jahn-Teller distortion induced lattice symmetry breaking, occuring below the orbital ordering of Fe2+. Furthermore, the coupled ferroelectric polarization and magnetization in response to magnetic field are observed. The present work suggests that spinel FeCr2S4 is a multiferroic offering both ferroelectricity and ferrimagnetism with large net magnetization.

Introduction

For multiferroic applications, one of the most desirable and appealing functionalities is the coexisting ferroelectricity and ferromagnetism as well as their strong coupling1,2. This is the main motivation driving intense researches in the past decade. The unusual coupling between the two types of ferroic orders has been paid attention since the pioneer works on BiFeO3 and TbMnO33,4. Nevertheless, so far discovered multiferroics manifest diverse crystallographic structures and ferroelectric origins. The most concerned multiferroics includes (1) perovskite RMnO3 (R = Dy, Tb, Gd, Eu1-xYx)5,6, hexaferrites Ba2Mg2Fe12O227, and LiCu2O28, where noncollinear spin orders and spin-orbit coupling (SOC) play the central roles; (2) orthorhombic RMnO3 (R = Ho, Y)9 and rhombohedral Ca3CoMnO6 with collinear spin orders and spin-lattice coupling10; and (3) orthorhombic RMn2O5 (R = Tb, Ho, Dy) with coexisting noncollinear and collinear orders, etc11.

Unfortunately, a common characteristic of these multiferroics is the antiferromagnetically induced ferroelectricity. In other words, no matter how the SOC or the spin-lattice coupling as the microscopic mechanism for the ferroelectricity generation works, the antiferromagnetic (AFM) order is the pre-requisite in addition to the sufficient band gap. Therefore, coexistence of ferroelectricity and ferromagnetism remains to be a substantial issue so far. A well known exception is CoCr2O4 in which not only the AFM-induced ferroelectric (FE) polarization (P) but also large net magnetization (M) was observed besides the strong magnetic control of polarization reversal12,13. The reason is that the Cr3+ spins order in a conical geometry so that a net but yet weak magnetization is available. To our best knowledge, CoCr2O4 has probably been the only multiferroic offering well defined single-loop P-H and M-H hysteresis where H is magnetic field, due to the conical spin structure developed below temperature T ~ 26 K12.

CoCr2O4 belongs to the well known spinel (magnetite) family with AB2X4 formula, where A = (Fe, Co, Mn, Cu, Hg), B = (Cr, V, Sc), and X = (O, S, Se)14,15. The unusual multiferroic behaviors of CoCr2O4 have motivated further investigations on the magnetism and electronic properties of this spinel family in the past years. This family, however, exhibits diverse physical phenomena, including magnetoresistance associated with the Verwey transitions16, spin-orbital liquid (FeSc2O4) and spin liquid (MnSc2O4)17, orbital glass (FeCr2S4)18, and colossal magnetocapacitance (CdCr2S4, HgCr2S4)19,20. The interplay of spin, orbit, and lattice degrees of freedom is believed to play an important role in driving these emergent phenomena. For the multiferroicity, CdCr2S4 is one of the few compounds besides CoCr2O4 that ferromagnetic (FM) order weakly couples with relaxor ferroelectricity19. The relaxor dipole was claimed to originate from the off-center position of Cr3+ ion21. Furthermore, quite a number of members in this family exhibit the ferrimagnetic (FIM) structure with considerable SOC. The FIM lattice allows a nonzero M even though the nature of interactions is AFM. If such an AFM order favors ferroelectricity, the coexistence of nonzero P and M in such FIM lattice becomes accessible, so long as the two magnetic sublattices have non-equivalent moments. This is the motivation for searching candidate multiferroics with emergent coupling of FE and FM orders.

In this work, we address the magnetic and electrical properties of FeCr2S4 which is also a FIM insulator at low T22. A choice of FeCr2S4 is based on earlier works on the lattice/electronic structures and magnetodielectric behaviors22,23,24. First, as shown in Fig. 1(a) and (b), Cr3+ ions (3d3, S = 3/2) occupy the octahedral sites and the Cr3+-Cr3+ pairs are dominated with the FM exchange via the 90° Cr3+-S2−-Cr3+ bond angle, while the Fe2+ ions (3d6, S = 2) are located at the tetrahedrally coordinated sites. The exchange interaction within the Fe sublattice is weak and overruled by the much stronger AFM Fe2+-Cr3+ exchange, leading to the FIM ordering with interactive Cr3+ and Fe2+ sublattices at temperature T = TN ~ 170 K. A cubic to triclinic phase transition at T ~ 60 K was once reported but far from confirmed in other experiments25. Below T ~ 60 K, the orbital moment of Cr3+ ions is quenched due to the half-filled t2g ground state until an orbital ordering at Too = 8 ~ 10 K which, however, arises from the orbital ground state of Fe2+ ions with unfilled eg state rather than Cr3+ ions18. For the Fe2+ ions here, the spin degeneracy is lifted and splits into 5 levels by the internal exchange field23. This degeneracy can be further coupled to the lattice vibrations, leading to a cooperative Jahn-Teller (JT) distortion occurring at Too, a critical event26. It is noted that in the orbital physics, usually the strong electron-phonon coupling can lift the orbital degeneracy and results in a long-range orbital ordering (OO) which lowers the crystal symmetry via the JT effect27. Quite a few theoretical models were proposed to correlate the ferroelectricity with such JT distortion and OO structure, mainly in ABO3-type perovskite oxides28.

Figure 1
Figure 1

(a) A schematic crystal structure of FeCr2S4. The Fe2+ and Cr3+ ions are located at the center of tetrahedral and octahedral S2- cages, respectively. (b) Occupation of the crystal-field levels for Fe2+ and Cr3+ in FeCr2S4. (c) The XRD spectra and Rietveld refinement of powder FeCr2S4 at room temperature.

Nevertheless, available data on the lattice and spin structures of FeCr2S4 are authors-dependent. Earlier neutron powder scattering at 4.2 K claimed the simple cubic spinel structure and the collinear FIM spin order29,30, however, recent neutron scattering indicated that the maximum displacement of the ligand S2− ions is estimated to be ~0.04Å, and the resultant splitting of the Bragg reflection could not be resolved24. Muon spin rotation/relaxation (μSR) spectroscopy indicated that the collinear FIM structure evolves into an incommensurately modulated noncollinear spin structure below ~50 K, which then remains stable down to the Fe2+ orbital ordering Too31. It seems that two antiferromagnetically coupled cone-like spiral spin structure sets in T ~ 50 K, and an OO sequence due to the JT effect enters at Too. The favored story is that the former contributes to a net magnetization and the latter to a possible electric polarization. Consequently, the Cr3+ and Fe2+ sublattices with noncollinear moments are coupled in a roughly anti-parallel alignment, leading to weak structural distortion as revealed by a series of measurements including the X-ray synchrotron powder diffraction, sound-velocity, and thermal-expansion23.

Certainly, the FIM state is highly favored here for multiferroicity because it allows a net magnetization, a major step towards the ferromagnetism. On the other hand, the strong electron-phonon coupling and the Fe2+ orbital ordering suggest a potential for magnetically induced ferroelectricity32. Recent dielectric permittivity data indicate remarkable magnetodielectric response although no details of the underlying physics have been clarified24. In this work, we pay our attention to the low-T pyroelectric current measurements of FeCr2S4 in addition to other structural and magnetic characterizations. Our results provide clear evidence that FeCr2S4 does show a FE transition at Too and a coexistence of nonzero electrical polarization and nonzero magnetization. And more importantly, FeCr2S4 exhibits strong magnetoelectric coupling, and the ferroelectric mechanism is subsequently proposed based on the relevant data.

Results

Specific heat & magnetic properties

Before presenting the specific heat and magnetic data, we first identify the crystallinity at room temperature and the XRD θ-2θ spectrum is plotted in Fig. 1(c). All the reflections are well indexed by single phase cubic FeCr2S4 and no impurity phase is detected. We perform the Rietveld refinement of the XRD data using the GSAS program33, and the refined result is in good agreement with the cubic structure of lattice constant a = 9.9920Å, with reliability parameters Rwp = 5.78%, Rp = 4.23%, and χ2 = 2.25.

The measured specific heat Cp(T) data are presented in Fig. 2(a). Two clear anomalies in the Cp(T) curve, respectively at TN = 165 K and Too ~ 8.0 K are observed, which represent the FIM transition and Fe2+-OO transition, respectively. A weak bump at T ~ 60 K can be identified, which is attributed to the evolution of magnetic domain structure due to a structural transformation. These features finds the one-to-one correspondences in the M(T) curves under the ZFC and FC modes, as shown in Fig. 2(b). The sharp shoulder-like feature at TN is from the FIM transition, below which the M values in the ZFC and FC modes begin to separate until the lowest-T. Since the Fe2+ and Cr3+ spins have big difference in moment, the M can be as big as 1.6 μB/f.u24. It should be mentioned that the separation in M between the ZFC and FC modes is attributed to the domain wall motion with pining centers, as previously reported34. On the other hand, the maximal M value around Tnc for the FC mode is 0.62 μB/f.u., not only much smaller than either the moment of the Cr3+ sublattice or that of the Fe2+ sublattice, but also smaller than the net moment of the FIM state (~1.9 μB/f.u.), assuming the collinear and antiparallel FIM lattice. This implies that the spins in the two sublattices align most likely in the noncollinear configuration, as suggested by the μSR spectroscopy31.

Figure 2
Figure 2

(a) Specific heat Cp/T vs T plot, showing the ferrimagnetic and orbital ordering transitions at TN and Too. (b) T dependence of M in the ZFC and FC modes. (c) The Cp and M within T = 2–11 K. (d) Measured Ipyro as a function of T under different warming rate (2 and 4 K/min). (e) T dependence of polarization (P) and dielectric constant (ε) at three different frequencies as labeled.

The Cp(T) and ZFC M(T) data below T = 11 K are re-plotted in Fig. 2(c). The one-to-one correspondence between the Cp-peak and the M-anomaly around Too in the ZFC mode is seen, indicating the correlation between the Fe2+-OO transition and spin re-ordering. This spin re-ordering sequence is most likely due to the enhanced stabilization of the non-collinear spin configuration induced by the Fe2+-OO transition, noting that the non-collinear spin ordering is one of the pre-requisites for SOC driven ferroelectricity as identified in a number of multiferroics.

Ferroelectric transitions

Now we focus on the dielectric and ferroelectric (FE) behaviors. The dielectric permittivity was applied by the parallel circuit mode, in which the accuracy of measurement is largely not affected by leakage current if any. In addition, the parallel equivalent circuit model can fit the data well by using Zview program. As expected, the dielectric constant falls continuously with decreasing T until an anomalous peak around Too, as shown in Fig. 2(e). This anomaly signs a ferroelectric transition. It can be seen that there is no apparent shift of the anomalous peak over a broad range of frequency although normal dielectric dispersion behavior, featured by gradual decrease with increasing f, is observed. Then the measured Ipyro(T) curves at two different rates are plotted in Fig. 2(d). Two clear Ipyro-peaks are shown in each case and no identifiable T-axis shift of these peaks is seen, indicating that the Ipyro does come from the pyroelectric effect. The evaluated polarization P(T) data from the two Ipyro(T) curves fall on the master curve plotted in Fig. 2(e). The ferroelectric transition begins at Too and the P reaches the saturated value of ~70 μC/m2 below T = 4 K. The saturated P is smaller than those magnetic multiferroics such as CaMn7O1235, and Tb(Dy)Mn2O511 etc, but larger than the observed P for other spinel compounds like CoCr2O412 and hexaferrites36.

It should be mentioned that the two Ipyro(T) peaks most likely imply two ferroelectric transitions. The P(T) dependence confirms this argument. If the transition around Too is related to the non-collinear spin order, the other (second) transition at lower T may possibly be the consequence of the JT distortion which lowers the lattice symmetry. If this argument applies, one expects that the electric polarization (P2) arisen from the transition around Too is highly sensitive to magnetic field, and the polarization (P1) from the lower-T transition would be robust against magnetic field. Along this line, it is useful to investigate the response of electric polarization to magnetic field.

Magnetoelectric response

We perform the iso-thermal and iso-field experiments on the magnetoelectric response. For the iso-field experiments, the Ipyro(T) data under different magnetic fields H are plotted in Fig. 3(a) with the evaluated P(T) data presented in Fig. 3(b). As discussed, the prominent feature is the remarkable response of the Ipyro peak around Too to H, while the low T peak is much less changeable. The high T peak is totally suppressed at H>4.0 T, but the low T peak is only slightly suppressed under a field as high as 7.0 T. Besides, it is noted that the ferroelectric Curie point, as evaluated from the P(T) data, remains less affected either. We can plot the evaluated P data at T = 2 K and 5 K as a function of H in Fig. 3(c), noting here that the linear H-axis is re-scaled as H1/2 only for clear presentation of the data in the low-H range. The polarization is rapidly suppressed by increasing H in the low-H range but far from complete even under high H. At T = 2 K, the variation in P upon H up to 7.0 T is ~40 μC/m2, leaving the remnant polarization as big as ~30 μC/m2. Similar tendency is observed for the data at T = 5 K.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Measured Ipyro-T data (a) and P-T data (b) under various magnetic fields. (c) Evaluated P-H relations under T = 2 K and 5 K. (d) Measured Ipole-H and ΔP-H data at T = 2 K with scanning magnetic field rate 100 Oe/s.

For the iso-thermal experiments, the Ipole(H) data at T = 2 K are plotted in Fig. 3(d) together with the evaluated ΔP(H) data. The rapid suppression of P by H in the low-H range is featured by the Ipole(H) peak and the rapid decay of P with increasing H. The P variation is ~25 μC/m2, slightly smaller than the iso-field data shown in Fig. 3(c). It should be mentioned that the P(H) data and the ΔP(H) data from the two different modes of measurement can't be identical, and finite differences between them are reasonable. Considering the measurement process, the captured current Ipole should be purely considered as the induced magnetoelectric current (high-T peak) motivated by the magnetic field. However, for the pyroelectric current (Ipyro-T) measurement mode, the P-H relation at 2 K shown in Fig. 3(c) should contain two components variation: the strong H-dependent high-T polarization, and relatively weak H-dependent low-T polarization.

Two polarization components

The data presented above on ferroelectricity suggest the two polarization components which may have different origins. The magnetoelectric data allow a possible roadmap to separate the two components from each other. Indeed, the separation of the two components is far from accurate and it is impossible to give a convincing function to fit the Ipyro(T) curve since we have no sufficient knowledge on the details of the FE polarization as a function of T. The high temperature current peak is supposed to come from the magnetoelectric domain via the inverse DM mechanism, which is seriously H-dependent. Here, we present the ΔP-H curves under different T, as shown in Fig. 4(a). The induced polarizations ΔP tuned by H varying from 0 to 2 Tesla at T = 2 K, 4 K, and 6 K are almost the same, implying that the stable conical spin order should be established below T = 6 K. Therefore, one reasonably assumes no more contribution from current Ip2 below 6 K, i.e. Ip2 = 0 at T<6 K. From this perspective, it should be practical to fit the high temperature contribution Ip2. Here, we use Bigaussian function to fit this peak. The parameters for the Bigaussian function fitting are as follows: y0 = 0, xc = 8.0784, H = 4.9826, w1 = 0.50495, and w2 = 0.25754. As shown in Fig. 4(b), the blue dashed curve (Ip2) reflects the pyroelectric current contributed from the magnetically induced polarization which can be suppressed by H, whereas the red solid curve (Ip1) reflects the pyroelectric effect arisen from the polarization which is only weakly H-dependent. The evaluated two components (P1 and P2) as a function of T respectively are plotted in Fig. 4(c). It is seen that the FE transition associated with P2 is relatively sharp and tends to be saturated. The transition associated with P1, however, is relatively diffused and P1 can't be saturated until very low T (<3 K). The corresponding transition point is also slightly lower than that associated with P2.

Figure 4
Figure 4

(a) H dependence of ΔP measured under T = 2 K, 4 K, 6 K, and 8 K. (b) Measured Ipyro and the two separated single-peaked curves Ip1 and Ip2. (c) T dependence of polarization P and the evaluated two components P1 and P2, which correspond to the conical spin order and Jahn-Teller effect origin, respectively. (d) The P-E and I-E loop at T = 2 K obtained by PUND method.

To further explore the ferroelectricity in FeCr2S4, we also employ the Positive-Up-Negative-Down (PUND) method to measure the P-E loop. It is noted that PUND method is very effective to discriminate those undesirable factors (e.g., conductive and capacitance current) from the ferroelectric component, enabling the undesirable components to be subtracted without any assumption. Even though there are dramatic deviation between background and ferroelectric component, which may result in inaccurate polarization, the careful selection of amps range and good synchronization of the voltage step are much helpful to improve the accuracy of the data read-out. Fig. 4(d) shows the I-E and P-E loops measured under T = 2 K. The measured ferroelectric current is one order larger than the accuracy (~40 pA), implying the subtracted current data is still reliable. The PUND data confirms the ferroelectricity as revealed by the pyroelectric current method.

Ferroelectric polarization and nonzero magnetization

Finally, we present the data on the coexistence of ferroelectricity and ferromagnetism. The polarization PP), dielectric constant ε, and magnetization M as a function of cycling H at T = 2 K are plotted in Fig. 5(a)~(c). The polarization is presented by its variation against H = 1.5T from H = 0, and this variation equals approximately to P2. Magnetic field can not only modulate substantially the polarization but also drive well defined ferromagnetic hysteresis. At T = 2 K, the saturated M reaches as big as ~1.5 μB/f.u. at a low field of ~0.5 T and the coercive field is only 0.06 T. Although the magnetic state is ferrimagnetic, the magnetization is sufficiently big for a number of magnetic applications.

Figure 5
Figure 5

Measured (a) ΔP (P2)-H data (b) ε-H data, and (c) M-H hysteresis loop at T = 2 K.

Although both the P and M exhibit the one-to-one correspondence in response to H, an effective inter-coupling between them remains an issue. In FeCr2S4, the Fe2+ spin sublattice and Cr3+ spin sublattice are roughly anti-parallel, where each sublattice has relatively weak non-collinear spin component besides the dominant collinear spin component. The ferrimagnetic M-H hysteresis shown in Fig. 5(c) reflects that magnetic field cycling reverses the ferrimagnetic lattice from one direction to the opposite one. Meanwhile, the applied magnetic field suppresses the noncollinear spin component and thus suppresses the as-generated polarization component (P2).

It should be noted that the above two processes may be coupled to some extent but not be necessarily tightly correlated with each other. When H decreases from a sufficiently high value, no identifiable current release is observable. This irreversible P-H sequence is most likely due to that the magnetic field induced collinear spin structure is frozen at T = 2 K and the relaxation time for the noncollinear spin structure is very long. This issue still needs to be investigated further. In short, the coupled ferroelectric polarization and magnetization is realized in FeCr2S4, as further revealed by the discussion on the magnetic origin of electric polarization.

Discussion

The above experimental results raise three issues needed to address. First, considering the complicated magnetic structure, what physical ingredients are necessary for FeCr2S4 to be an insulator and even a ferroelectric? Second, two ferroelectric polarization components are observed, and which obviously have different origins. For component P2, if the noncollinear spin order and spin-orbit coupling are involved, why the ferroelectric transitions occur at the orbit ordering point Too rather than the much higher noncollinear spin ordering point Tnc ~ 50 K? Third, for the component P1, is it the Jahn-Teller distortion responsible for its generation? If so, the structural origin for this component should be discussed.

Roles of the spin-orbit coupling

For the first issue, we perform the first-principles calculations on the electronic structure of FeCr2S4. Although the noncollinear spin order was reported below Tnc, the major spin moments of Fe2+ and Cr3+ align along the c-axis. The calculations in the GGA scheme predict a metallic state, as shown by the total density of states (TDOS) for spin-up and spin down in Fig. 6(a), which is physically unreasonable. The Fermi level always passes through the spin up channel, suggesting the half metal ferrimagnetic behavior. Subsequently, the on-site Coulomb interactions (U) are imposed respectively on the Fe2+ site and Cr3+ site in the GGA+U scheme. The calculated TDOS for UFe = 5 eV and UCr = 2 eV are shown in Fig. 6(b), consistent with earlier report22. The half-metal ferrimagnetic states are predicted no matter how the UFe and UCr are taken in the reasonable region (0.0 ~ 6.0 eV). Although the GGA scheme may underestimate a bit the band gap, the present results suggest that additional ingredient should be included.

Figure 6: The calculated total density of states obtained for (a) UFe = UCr = 0 eV (GGA), (b) UFe = 5 eV, UCr = 2 eV (GGA+U), and (c) inclusion spin-orbit coupling (GGA+U+SO).
Figure 6

Subsequently, the spin-orbit coupling (SOC) effect is considered. Inclusion of the SOC results in weak spin moments on the ab-plane in addition to the dominant antiparallel moments along the c-axis. Due to the in-plane moments, no TDOS spectra for the spin-up and spin-down bands can be obtained. However, the in-plane moments are too small (~0.01 μB) to be considered practically. In Fig. 6(c) is plotted the DOS spectrum, and one observes clearly a band gap of ~0.6 eV once the SOC is included, indicating the substantial role of the SOC in driving FeCr2S4 into an insulator with direct band gap. Most likely, this gap can't maintain the high temperature ferroelectricity but is sufficient for multiferroicity at low T. Besides, the calculated energy E in the GGA+U+SOC case is −85.56 eV, lower than that within the GGA+U (E = −83.74 eV), implying that the insulator state is more stable. It is suggested that the SOC is one of the critical ingredients of physics in determining the electronic structure of FeCr2S4. What should be mentioned here is that the SOC is also a critical mechanism for ferroelectricity generation in a noncollinear spin lattice via the asymmetric exchange striction, to be addressed below.

Spiral spin structure

We deal with the second issue: origin for polarization component P2 which is sensitive to H. Since details of the magnetic structure are not available to us, our discussion is qualitative and preliminary. Given the considerable role of the SOC, one may discuss relevant experimental evidence for the noncollinear spin order so that a combination of the SOC effect and noncollinear spin order can be utilized to explain the ferroelectricity generation. Earlier Bessel-type μSR experiments indicated the incommensurate spiral spin ordering established below Tnc. Moreover, the Mossbauer data exclude the magnitude modulation of Fe2+ moments, and correlate it with the orientation modulation of these moments31. Since the Fe2+ and Cr3+ ions form staggered layers, as shown in Fig. 7(a), the nearest-neighbor (NN) Cr3+-Cr3+ distance is 3.534Å along the [110] direction and this interaction J1 is dominated by ferromagnetic (FM) superexchange due to the ~90° Cr3+-S2-Cr3+ bond angle. The next-nearest-neighbor (NNN) superexchange interaction J2 is dominated by antiferromagnetic (AFM) interaction between the Cr3+-Fe2+ pair, as shown in Fig. 7(b). What should be mentioned is that there are two NNN Fe2+ sites at the neighboring layers of each Cr3+ layer along the c-axis, as indicated by Fe1 and Fe2. This implies that four J2 terms compete with one J1 term, which gives rise to the competing spin frustration. It is known that the magnetic phase transitions in spin frustrated systems are abundant, and noncollinear spiral spin order (SSO) due to the competing interactions are often observed in multiferroics. For the origin of SSO, the J1-J2-J3 model along with other models predicts that the magnetic frustration between the NN FM interaction and the NNN AFM interaction is a direct rout to generate the SSO phase37,38,39. Similar to RMnO3, FeCr2S4 has both the NN FM and NNN AFM interactions, and thus may have the SSO phase or spiral spin structure.

Figure 7
Figure 7

(a) Schematic structure of spinel FeCr2S4. Each Cr layer is accompanied by up Fe2 layer and down Fe1 layer. (b) Spin-exchange interactions in FeCr2S4. The nearest neighbor ferromagnetic exchange J1 on the Cr-Cr bond along [110] direction, and the next- nearest-neighbor antiferromagnetic exchange J2 on the Fe-Cr bond are considered.

Nevertheless, the measured ferroelectric transition occurs far below Tnc ~ 50 K, seemingly inconsistent with the above discussion. The reason may be associated with the particular properties of magnetic ground state in cubic AB2X4 spinel lattice, as proposed by Lyons, Kaplan, Dwight, and Menyuk (LKDM theory) about 50 years ago40. Starting from the classical Heisenberg model and considering only the B-B and A-B NN interactions, one learns that the magnetic ground state is determined by parameter u = 4JBBSB/(3JABSA), where JBB and JAB denote the two NN and NNN interactions, SB and SA are the moment magnitudes at the two sites. Although the LKDM theory may be over-simplified in this sense, it allows a qualitative prediction of the magnetic ground state. For FeCr2S4, one has u = J1/J2. However, it was reported that the short range orbital fluctuations play role in suppressing the magnetic transitions which can't occur unless temperature T decreases down to a proper value at which parameter u>9/8 for ferromagnetic spiral ordering23. Unfortunately, this order results in degenerate spiral spin states. Upon further decreasing of T, the cooperative Jahn-Teller distortion becomes no longer negligible and lifts the degeneracy of those spiral spin states so that one of them becomes the ground state. Consequently, one observes the polarization component P2 associated with the SOC driven anionic displacement right below TOO.

Additional evidence on the above scenario is given by Monte Carlo simulation41, in which the role of magnetic anisotropy is addressed, and magnetic anisotropy could stabilize the spiral spin order, leading to a proper u value for the spiral spin order. However, the A-A (Fe2+-Fe2+) exchange interaction enhances the frustration and thus suppresses the spiral spin order. A large magnetic anisotropy was reported in FeCr2S442. The first-principles calculations also reported that the spin quantization of FeCr2S4 is along the [001] and [110], while the [110] quantization is favored when the magnetic anisotropy is ~10 meV/Fe and higher22. Therefore, all the related evidences indicate a complex magnetic phases under the influence of magnetic anisotropy and exchange coupling.

Based on the above scenario, a straightforward schematic spin configuration is proposed in Fig. 8. Both the Cr3+ and Fe2+ spins form the conical spiral spin order below Too. The circles and slanted arrows represent the spiral plane of the respective spins. It can be seen that the Cr3+ and Fe2+ moments align mainly along the c-axis with antiparralle arrangement. On the ab plane, the Fe1 (Fe2) and Cr spins rotate to form a transverse spin spiral propagating along the (-110) direction. The generated polarization can be explained by the antisymmetric magnetostriction: where A and B denote the coupling constants determined by the SOC and Fe2+-Cr3+ exchange. The unit vector ei,j and em,n connect two Fe spin sites i, j and two Cr spin sites m and n. It is thus suggested that the two types of canted spins can generate an electric polarization via the SOC, and the electric polarization (P2) prefers to align along the [110].

Figure 8: Proposed conical spin order of Cr3+ and Fe2+ ions in FeCr2S4.
Figure 8

The spin projected on the ab-plane generates macroscopic polarization P2, while the magnetic moment along the c direction forms the ferrimagnetic Fe2+ and Cr3+ sublattices.

Jahn-Teller distortion

Finally, we discuss the possible origin for the polarization component P1 appearing at slightly lower T than Too, which is insensitive to magnetic field H. One has reason to argue that it is induced structurally rather than magnetically. In fact, early high-resolution X-ray experiment showed a considerable broadening of the diffraction line that sets in around Tnc, which reaches a peak at Too23. This evidences a structural anomaly at the orbital-order transition due to a static cooperative Jahn-Teller effect, implying the strong SOC role. In addition, the thermal expansion23, ultrasound spectroscopy43, and Raman-scattering data32 indicate the lattice anomaly near Too.

Roughly speaking, the Jahn-Teller distortion on one hand further splits the degeneracy of Fe2+ eg doublet and gives rise to the orbital ordering transition, suggesting the mutual interaction between spin configuration and orbital correlations23. On the other hand, based on the first-principles calculation22, the crystal symmetry reduction from the Fd3m to F-43m is related to the combined effects of tetragonal distortions due to the Jahn-Teller active Fe2+ ions and trigonal distortions due to a minor displacement of Cr3+ ions along the [111] direction22. Under a small Cr3+ displacement, the S2− movement tends to create two inequivalent FeS4 tetrahedra with two different volumes, which dominates the experimental observed lattice distortion. Besides, it is also reported that the S2− movement prefers to increase the band gap, while Cr3+ ion movement tends to narrow it22. The T-dependent displacement parameter of S2−, Fe2+, and Cr3+ ions are presented by high-resolution X-ray experimental data, with larger displacement of S2− and the smallest displacement of Cr3+, which implies the intense correlation between JT distortion and band gap or even ferroelectricity23. Therefore, the as-generated polarization, if any, would be gradually enhanced with decreasing T, as shown in Fig. 4(c).

It should be mentioned that the Jahn-Teller distortion induced ferroelectricity was proposed for quite a few displacive-type normal ferroelectrics and relevant theoretical consideration was given by Bersuker28,44. Although details of the mode-softening with this polarization component remain unclear, our discussion deserves for future investigation.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated the coupled ferroelectricity and ferrimagnetism in magnetic spinel FeCr2S4. The spin-orbit coupling plays an important role in the formation of ferroelectricity. Due to spin-orbit coupling and noncollinear spiral spin order, FeCr2S4 evolves into ferroelectric phase at the Fe2+ orbital ordering termperature Too = 8.5 K. Such a ferroelectric phase on one hand originates from the spiral spin structures of Fe2+ and Cr3+ sublattices, which are established from the spin frustration and magnetic anisotropy. On the other hand, the Jahn-Teller distortion tends to induce ionic displacement, giving rise to the large band gap and polarization along with the orbital ordering of Fe2+. Therefore, our data on FeCr2S4 evidence the coupling between ferroelectricity, orbital ordering, Jahn-Teller distortion, and magnetism. A preliminary report of the multiferroic data on FeCr2S4 was presented at the 2013 APS March meeting (http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2013.MAR.F21.1). While this article was proof-read, it became aware to us that Bertinshaw, J. et al reported relevant experiments on possible multiferroic ground state of FeCr2S424.

Methods

Polycrystalline FeCr2S4 samples were prepared by conventional solid state reaction method from high purity iron (99.9%), chromium (99.9%), and sulfur (99.9%) powder by thoroughly grinding and then sealing in evacuated quartz tube. The samples were slowly heated to 1000°C and iso-thermally annealed for about one week. It is noted that a stoichiometric Fe:Cr:S mixture is practically not sufficient for sintering stoichiometric FeCr2S4 samples since the as-synthesized powder contains tiny Cr2S3 impurity phase. In order to exclude this impurity phase, slightly excess Fe and S powder was added. Subsequently, the as-sintered powder, containing FeS impurity rather than Cr2S3 impurity, was washed to remove the FeS impurity, leaving pure FeCr2S4 powder. Finally, the powder was re-ground, pressed into pellets, and sintered in evacuated quartz tube at 1000°C for about 3 days to obtain the high dense ceramic disks. The phase structure was checked by X-ray diffraction (XRD) (Bruker Corporation) equipped with Cu Kα radiation. It is noted that we also grew FeCr2S4 single crystals using the flux solution method. The crystals are ~0.20 mm in size and contain impurity phase which excludes reliable electrical measurements. Therefore, we only present our data on the polycrystalline samples.

For magnetic properties, the dc magnetization (M) as a function of T under the zero field cooled (ZFC) and field cooling (FC) sequences respectively was measured by the superconducting quantum interference device magnetometer (SQUID) (Quantum Design, Inc.), with the cooling and measuring magnetic field of 50 Oe. The isothermal magnetic hysteresis (M. vs. magnetic field H) was also measured. The specific heat Cp was measured using the standard thermal unit with the physical properties measurement system (PPMS) (Quantum Design, Inc.).

For electrical measurements, the disk-like samples of 6.0 mm in diameter and 0.12 mm in thickness were deposited with Au electrodes on the top/bottom surfaces. The dielectric constant ε as a function of T was measured using the HP4294A impedance analyzer attached to the PPMS. The equivalent parallel circuit model can fit the data well, in which the accuracy is less affected by leakage current. Voltage dependence of the permittivity was also performed to rule out a Schottky diode like character. In our experiments, for each measurement we used both Au and silver paste electrodes and didn't observe remarkable difference in terms of the dielectric constant and pyroelectric current. The ferroelectric polarization P was measured by probing the constant-field pyroelectric current and isothermal polarized current via the Keithley 6514 electrometer connected with the PPMS too. For the pyroelectric current measurement, the sample was electrically poled under an electric field Ep = ±3.8 kV/cm and cooled down from 100 K to 2 K. Then the poling field was removed and the sample was electrically short-circuited for 30 min to several hours in order to exclude possible contributions other than the polarized charges associated with P. Usually, this discharging process continues until the background is less than 0.2 pA. The pyroelectric current Ipyro during the subsequent warming process was collected at different ramping rates of 2–6 K/min, respectively.

The ferroelectric hysteresis loop was measured using Positive-Up-Negative-Down (PUND) method. In order to improve the precision of the data read-out, Keithley 6517B electrometer was chosen to output a point by point triangular voltage, e.g., each triangular wave width is ~ 8.5 s. In our practical measurement, a voltage is first applied on for a specific time, then the current is read out. Such delay time is fixed and reliable. The first positive and negative triangular voltage are used to fully align the ferroelectric domains. Then, during the next two positive (negative) ones, two effective polarization curves are recorded. A subtraction of the two sets of current data gives the pure polarization.

For the pyroelectric current (Ipyro-T) measurements under a constant H, the assigned field H was applied to the sample at T = 2 K before the electric short-circuiting process until the end of the measurements. However, for the isothermal polarized current (Ipole) probing against H (Ipole-H), the sample was first electrically poled and cooled down to an assigned T in the FE phase with H = 0, and then the electric field was removed, followed by sufficiently long time electric short-circuiting. The released Ipole upon increasing H from H = 0 to H = ±4.0 T at a rate of 100 Oe/s was collected.

It brings our attention that the electronic structure of FeCr2S4 is sensitive to the SOC which is also a critical physical ingredient for generating the ferroelectricity. Our pre-calculations indicated that FeCr2S4 is always a half-metal if the SOC is not included. This stimulates us to focus on the electronic and magnetic structures of FeCr2S4 by means of the first-principles calculations in complimentary to experimental investigations. However, we have not intended to calculate the ferroelectricity since no specific concrete data on the magnetism (spin configuration) are available.

The first-principles calculations are performed using the Vienna ab initio simulation package (vasp) code45 and the Perdew-Becke-Erzenhof (PBE) generalized gradient approximation (GGA) function46. The lattice parameters are first fixed to our refined XRD data based on a cubic symmetry, until an optimized value of 9.8893Å is obtained. Here the cubic lattice symmetry rather than the triclinic symmetry is used since the latter has yet not confirmed, and quite a few earlier reports indicated the quasi-cubic symmetry in the extremely low T range47. The projector-augmented-wave (PAW) pseudopotential48 is utilized with a plane-wave energy cutoff of 500 eV, and we use a 9 × 9 × 9 Monkhorst-Pack mesh of k points. In order to include the on-site Coulomb interaction, the GGA plus Hubbard U (GGA+U) methodology49 is used, and U is varied independently on both the Fe2+ and Cr3+ sites. Also the SOC effect on the electronic structure is taken into account in details.

In our calculations, the magnetism is included by imposing the most accepted ferrimagnetic alignment of the Fe2+ and Cr3+ sublattices along the c-axis in the optimized lattice structure, and then making the structure fully relaxed once more. The present calculations only give a qualitative scenario on which our discussion is based, partially due to the absence of data on the spin configuration.

References

  1. 1.

    , & Multiferroicity: the coupling between magnetic and polarization orders. Adv. Phys. 58, 321–448 (2009).

  2. 2.

    & Multiferroics: a magnetic twist for ferroelectricity. Nat. Mater. 6, 13–20 (2007).

  3. 3.

    et al. Epitaxial BiFeO3 multiferroic thin film heterostructures. Science 299, 1719–1722 (2003).

  4. 4.

    et al. Magnetic control of ferroelectric polarization. Nature 426, 55–58 (2003).

  5. 5.

    et al. Multiferroic phases of Eu1-xYxMnO3. Phys. Rev. B 75, 035118 (2007).

  6. 6.

    , , , & Magnetoelectric phase diagrams of orthorhombic RMnO3 (R = Gd, Tb, and Dy). Phys. Rev. B 71, 224425 (2005).

  7. 7.

    , , , & Low-magnetic-field control of electric polarization vector in a helimagnet. Science 319, 1643–1646 (2008).

  8. 8.

    , , , & Competition between helimagnetism and commensurate quantum spin correlations in LiCu2O2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 177201 (2004).

  9. 9.

    , , & Large magnetodielectric effects in orthorhombic HoMnO3 and YMnO3. Phys. Rev. B 70, 212412 (2004).

  10. 10.

    et al. Ferroelectricity in an Ising chain magnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 047601 (2008).

  11. 11.

    et al. Experimental observation of ferrielectricity in multiferroic DyMn2O5. Sci. Rep. 4, 3984 (2014).

  12. 12.

    et al. Magnetic reversal of the ferroelectric polarization in a multiferroic spinel oxide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 207204 (2006).

  13. 13.

    et al. Thermally or magnetically induced polarization reversal in the multiferroic CoCr2O4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 067601 (2009).

  14. 14.

    et al. Magnetoelasticity in ACr2O4 spinel oxides (A = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu). Phys. Rev. B 87, 064416 (2013).

  15. 15.

    et al. Spin and orbital order in the vanadium spinel MgV2O4. Phys. Rev. B 82, 140406(R) (2010).

  16. 16.

    , & Colossal magnetoresistance in Cr-based chalcogenide spinels. Nature 386, 156–159 (1997).

  17. 17.

    et al. Spin and orbital frustration in MnSc2S4 and FeSc2S4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 116401 (2004).

  18. 18.

    et al. Orbital freezing and orbital glass state in FeCr2S4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 027601 (2005).

  19. 19.

    et al. Relaxor ferroelectricity and colossal magnetocapacitive coupling in ferromagnetic CdCr2S4. Nature 434, 364–367 (2005).

  20. 20.

    et al. Colossal magnetocapacitance and colossal magnetoresistance in HgCr2S4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 157202 (2006).

  21. 21.

    et al. Dynamic off-centering of Cr3+ ions and short-range magneto-electric clusters in CdCr2S4. Phys. Rev. B 86, 224418 (2012).

  22. 22.

    , , & Electronic structure of FeCr2S4: evidence of coulomb enhanced spin-orbit splitting. Phys. Rev. B 80, 201101(R) (2009).

  23. 23.

    et al. Structural anomalies and the orbital ground state in FeCr2S4. Phys. Rev. B 81, 184426 (2010).

  24. 24.

    et al. FeCr2S4 in magnetic fields: possible evidence for a multiferroic ground state. Sci. Rep. 4, 6079; 10.1038/srep06079 (2014).

  25. 25.

    , , , & Low-temperature structural transition in FeCr2S4. Phys. Rev. B 71, 100408(R) (2005).

  26. 26.

    Unified description of the cooperative Jahn-Teller effect in FeCr2S4 and the impurity Jahn-Teller effect in CoCr2S4:Fe2+. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 15, 1515–1524 (1982).

  27. 27.

    & Co-operative Jahn-Teller effects. Rep. Prog. Phys. 38, 1–89 (1975).

  28. 28.

    Pseudo Jahn-Teller origin of perovskite multiferroics, magnetic-ferroelectric crossover, and magnetoelectric effects: the d0-d10 problem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 137202 (2012).

  29. 29.

    , & Magnetic structures in FeCr2S4 and FeCr2O4. J. Appl. Phys. 35, 954–955 (1964).

  30. 30.

    , & Neutron diffraction and magnetotransport properties in sulphur spinel. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 242–245, 201–204 (2002).

  31. 31.

    et al. Low temperature incommensurately modulated and noncollinear spin structure in FeCr2S4. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 22, 052205 (2010).

  32. 32.

    et al. Anomalous electronic, phonon, and spin excitations in the chalcogenide spinel FeCr2S4. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19, 145260 (2007).

  33. 33.

    A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2, 65–71 (1969).

  34. 34.

    et al. Ac susceptibility studies of ferrimagnetic FeCr2S4 single crystals. J. Appl. Phys. 90, 4639–4644 (2001).

  35. 35.

    et al. Giant improper ferroelectricity in the ferroaxial magnet CaMn7O12. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 067201 (2012).

  36. 36.

    et al. Multiferroic M-type hexaferrites with a room-temperature conical state and magnetically controllable spin helicity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 257201 (2010).

  37. 37.

    et al. Distorted perovskite with eg1 configuration as a frustrated spin system. Phys. Rev. B 68, 060403(R) (2003).

  38. 38.

    , , , & Origin of multiferroic spiral spin order in the RMnO3 perovskites. Phys. Rev. B 78, 155121 (2008).

  39. 39.

    , & Theory of spin-phonon coupling in multiferroic manganese perovskites RMnO3. Phys. Rev. B 84, 144409 (2011).

  40. 40.

    , , & Classical theory of the ground spin-state in cubic spinels. Phys. Rev. 126, 540–555 (1962).

  41. 41.

    Stable and locally stable conditions for a conical spin state in the spinel structure. EPL 102, 67013 (2013).

  42. 42.

    , & Magnetic anisotropy in colossal magnetoresistive FeCr2S4 single crystals. Solid State Commun. 130, 511–515 (2004).

  43. 43.

    , , & Ultrasonic study of ferrimagnetic FeCr2S4: evidence for low temperature structural transformations. J. Appl. Phys. 93, 9173–9176 (2003).

  44. 44.

    A local approach to solid state problems: pseudo Jahn-Teller origin of ferroelectricity and multiferroicity. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 428, 012028 (2013).

  45. 45.

    & Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

  46. 46.

    , & Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

  47. 47.

    , , & Looking for structural phase transitions in the colossal magnetoresistive thiospinel FeCr2S4 by a multi-temperature single-crystal X-ray diffraction study. Chem. Phys. Lett. 416, 28–32 (2005).

  48. 48.

    Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).

  49. 49.

    , & Density-functional theory and strong interactions: orbital ordering in Mott-Hubbard insulators. Phys. Rev. B 52, R5467–R5470 (1995).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National 973 Projects of China (Grants No. 2011CB922101), the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants Nos. 11234005, 11374147, 51332006), and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, China.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China

    • L. Lin
    • , H. X. Zhu
    • , K. F. Wang
    • , Z. B. Yan
    • , J. G. Wan
    •  & J.-M. Liu
  2. Institute for Quantum Materials, Hubei Polytechnic University, Huangshi 435100, China

    • X. M. Jiang
  3. Department of Physics, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China

    • L. Lin
    •  & S. Dong
  4. Institute of Solid State Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China

    • Z. R. Yang

Authors

  1. Search for L. Lin in:

  2. Search for H. X. Zhu in:

  3. Search for X. M. Jiang in:

  4. Search for K. F. Wang in:

  5. Search for S. Dong in:

  6. Search for Z. B. Yan in:

  7. Search for Z. R. Yang in:

  8. Search for J. G. Wan in:

  9. Search for J.-M. Liu in:

Contributions

J.M.L. and L.L. conceived and designed the experiments. L.L., X.M.J., Z.B.Y. carried out the experiments. Z.R.Y. provided the sample. H.X.Z. performed the first-principles calculations. K.F.W., S.D., and J.G.W. discussed the ferroelectric mechanism. J.M.L. and L.L. wrote the paper. All the authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to L. Lin or J.-M. Liu.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06530

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.