Abstract
Zeroindexmetamaterials (ZIM) have drawn much attention due to their intriguing properties and novel applications. Particularly, in a parallel plated ZIM waveguide system with defects, total reflection or transmission of wave can be achieved by adjusting the properties of defects. This effect has been explored extensively in different types of ZIM (e.g., epsilonnearzero metamaterials, matched impedance ZIM, or anisotropic ZIM). Almost all previous literatures showed that only monopole modes are excited inside the defects if they are in circular cylinder shapes. However, the underlying physics for excited modes inside defects is wrongly ignored. In this work, we uncover that additional modes could be excited by theoretical analysis, which is important as it will correct the current common perception. For the case of matched impedance zeroindex metamaterials (MIZIM), the additional dipole modes can be excited inside the defects when total transmission occurs. Moreover, we also observe the same results in Diracconelike photonic crystals which have been demonstrated theoretically and experimentally to function as MIZIM. For another case of epsilonnearzero metamaterials (ENZ), we find that additional higher order modes (e.g., tripole) can be excited inside the defects when total transmission happens. Numerical simulations are performed to verify our finding regarding the additional modes.
Introduction
In the beginning of the new century, the first metamaterial was achieved to realize the function of negative refractive index^{1}. After that, the research on metamaterials^{2,3,4,5,6,7} has made great progress. Recently, attention to zeroindexmetamaterials (ZIM)^{8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,32,33} has been extensive. For instance, matched impedance zeroindex metamaterials (MIZIMs), epsilonnearzero metamaterials (ENZ), anisotropic ENZ. By utilizing ZIM, some applications and devices with novel functionalities can be realized, such as squeezing wave energy^{10,11,12,13,14}, tailoring wave front^{15,16,17}, realizing total transmission and reflection in ZIM^{18,19,20,21,22}, waveguide bending^{23}, enhancing radiation from an embedded source^{24,25,26}, controlling energy flux^{27}, etc. Several years ago, by putting perfect electric conductor (PEC) or perfect magnetic conductor (PMC) defects in ZIM in a waveguide structure, Hao et al.^{18} confirmed that incident electromagnetic wave can undergo total reflection or transmission. Later, Nguyen et al.^{19} found similar effects by introducing dielectric defects into MIZIM. However, due to an insufficient expression of the magnetic field, some interesting phenomena and physics are thereby missing. For example, they claimed that for total transmission, only monopole modes exist in the dielectric defects. A lot of publications^{20,21,22,28,29,30} (including one from the authors^{20}) later followed this erroneous step, albeit some other intriguing properties found. In this letter, we will give a more comprehensive analysis and show that additional higher modes are excited together with the monopole modes. Our paper corrects some common misunderstanding and shows more colorful physics for ZIM systems.
Results
Now let us start from the schematic plot of a two dimensional (2D) waveguide structure in Fig. 1. Region 0 and region 3 are free space. Region 1 is ZIM with the effective permittivity and permeability ε_{1} and μ_{1}. Region 2 consists of N cylindrical defects embedded in region 1. The effective permittivity and permeability of the jth cylinder are ε_{2j} and μ_{2j}, respectively. Without loss of the generality, we suppose that a transverse magnetic (TM) wave (its magnetic field H is along z direction) is incident from the left port of the waveguide. The outer boundaries of the waveguide are set as PECs. If the incident wave is a transverse electric (TE) wave (with the electric field E polarized along z direction), the outer boundaries of the waveguide should be changed into PMCs for similar results.
For simplicity, we assume the incident magnetic field , where k_{0} is the wave vector in free space with k_{0} = ω/c, ω is the angular frequency, c is the velocity of light in free space, H_{0z} is the amplitude of the incident magnetic field. In the following sections, we will omit the time harmonic factor e^{−iωt}. The electromagnetic (EM) wave in each region satisfies the Maxwell's equations:
where the integer m indicates each region and ε_{m} is the relative permittivity of each region. The magnetic field in region 0 is a summation of the incident wave and the reflected wave and is written as,
the electric field is,
where is the reflection coefficient.
Likewise, we can obtain the magnetic field and the electric field in region 3 as,
where is the transmission coefficient. In region 1, as ε_{1} almost equals to zero, must be zero in order to guarantee a finite E_{1}. Consequently, the magnetic field in region 1 denoted as H_{1} should be a constant. By applying the boundary conditions at the interfaces of x = 0 and x = a, we have,
Therefore,
In region 2, the magnetic field inside each cylindrical defect follows the Helmholtz equation,
The solution can be written as a summation of infinite number of Bessel functions with angular terms. Therefore, the magnetic field in region 2 should be written as,
where t_{jn} are the coefficients to be determined for the nth order Bessel functions.
By applying Dirichlet boundary conditions at the surface of each defect, the magnetic field in region 2 becomes,
where J_{n}(x) is the nth order Bessel function with J_{n}(k_{2j}R_{j}) = 0. α_{jn} and β_{jn} are coefficients of the excited higher order modes, is the wave vector in the jth cylindrical defect, R_{j} is the radius of the jth cylinder, r_{j} is relative radial coordinate in the jth cylinder, θ_{j} is relative angular coordinate in the jth cylinder, as mentioned in Ref. 19. We note that the original expression of the magnetic field in each defect is wrongly assumed in Ref. 19 from the two missing terms that typify the additional modes in the defects. However, if J_{n}(k_{2j}R_{j}) ≠ 0, the two additional terms should not be included so that at each circular boundary r_{j} = R_{j}, the magnetic field takes the constant value H_{1}.
With Eq. (9), the electric field inside each defect could be obtained as follows by recalling Eq. (1),
where is the azimuthal unit vector for the jth cylindrical defect.
By using the Maxwell–Faraday equation,
and after some meticulous calculations, we could obtain the transmission coefficient as^{20},
where S = a × h is the entire area of region 1 and region 2, is the total area of region 2, which consists of N cylinders.
For the system of MIZIM
For matched impedance zeroindex materials (MIZIM), , Eq. (12) changes into the following formula,
which has been derived in Ref. 19 (the Eq. (8) therein). From the Eq. (13), we see that to achieve total transmission (), J_{1}(k_{2j}R_{j}) must be equal to zero. Therefore, we should select n = 1 in Eq. (9), the magnetic field in region 2 is then written as,
It is not only a function of r_{j} but also a function of θ_{j}, α_{j}_{1} and β_{j}_{1} are coefficients to be determined. Eq. (14) is the unique solution for total transmission with J_{1}(k_{2j}R_{j}) = 0. According to Eq. (14), we note that the magnetic field inside each defect consists of not only monopole modes, but also additional dipole modes.
To solve the coefficients of dipole modes, we suggest an approximate system, i.e., a dielectric cylinder embedded in MIZIM as the background. As the waveguide system supports TM_{0} mode, which resembles a plane wave, we suppose the incident wave is a plane wave along xdirection. The magnetic field in MIZIM could be expressed as^{31},
where H_{n}(x) is the nth order Hankel function of the first kind, H_{1} takes the same value of the constant magnetic field in the MIZIM area, g_{n} is the scattering coefficients, is the wave vector in MIZIM. When total transmission occurs, the scattering coefficients should be very tinny, that is g_{n} ≈ 0.
The magnetic field in the dielectric cylinder could be written as,
At the boundary of the cylinder r = R_{1}, we should have,
We can easily obtain the coefficient of each mode,
By combining Eq. (16) and (18) with Eq. (9), we could obtain the relationship between t_{1n} and α_{1n} as follows,
For MIZIM, as Eq. (14) only has two terms (n = 0 and n = 1). We could therefore obtain that,
α_{0} is the coefficient of the monopole mode and α_{11} is the coefficient of the dipole mode. Due to the symmetry in ydirection, the degenerate state of dipole mode inside the defect (J_{n}(k_{2j}r_{j})sin(nθ_{j}) in Eq. (9)) could not be excited out, the coefficient of the degenerate state (β_{jn}) should be zero.
We plot the relationship between the parameter α_{11}/α_{0} and different frequencies for three types of MIZIM (with ε_{1} = μ_{1} = 10^{−3}, 10^{−4}and 10^{−5}) from Eq. (21) and (22), as shown in Fig. 2. We also plot the related numerical result from the waveguide structure (the simulation results in the following sections are all from COMSOL). We find that dipole mode is much more dominative than monopole mode at the resonance frequency that J_{1}(k_{21}R_{1}) = 0. While for the frequencies slightly away from the resonance frequency, dipole mode becomes very weak or diminishes. When ε_{1} = μ_{1} tends to zero gradually, the coefficient of dipole mode will decrease accordingly and the resonance peak becomes narrower. The resonance frequencies from the numerical results have tiny shifts due to the effect of PEC boundaries of the waveguide. When ε_{1} = μ_{1} tends to zero gradually, they will get closer to the analytic resonance frequency.
We will verify the above findings from the numerical simulations. For simplicity, we assume that there is only one cylindrical defect in the region of ZIM. The radius of the cylindrical defect is 0.2 m. Its dielectric constant is ε_{21} = 4 and its relative permeability is μ_{21} = 1. In order to achieve total transmission, the term J_{1}(k_{21}R_{1}) should be equal to zero. As a result, the working frequency is 0.45737 GHz. However, due to the effect of PEC boundaries of the waveguide, this frequency is slightly away from the real resonant frequency, leading to diminishing dipole mode. Therefore, in the simulations, we select the frequency of 0.457 GHz so as to obtain more clear dipole mode. In the region of ZIM, we set a = h = 0.8 m. The magnetic field distributions for the above waveguide system are shown in Fig. 3 for ZIM with different permittivities. In Fig. 3(a), we set ε_{1} = μ_{1} = 0.001 and H_{1} = 1 and it seems that only monopole mode is excited from the field pattern. However, the field pattern just takes the real part of the magnetic field in COMSOL. In fact, if we read from the imaginary part, we could find that dipole mode exists. The magnetic field inside the defect is a summation of monopole mode and dipole mode from Eq. (14). The coefficients of monopole mode and dipole mode have a π/2 phase difference from Eq. (21) and Eq. (22). For instance, if we change H_{1} = 1 into H_{1} = i, we could find that dipole mode appears from the field pattern in Fig. 3(b). If we set ε_{1} = μ_{1} = 0.0001, the dipole mode will become weaker, as shown in Fig. 3(c). For ε_{1} = μ_{1} = 0.00001, dipole mode almost disappears, see in Fig. 3(d). We can also see this from Fig. 2. Numerically, we find that the coefficients of dipole modes are α_{11} = 12.37i, α_{11} = −3.42i and α_{11} = −0.245i for the cases of Fig. 3 (b), Fig. 3 (c) and Fig. 3 (d), respectively. For all the above cases, the coefficients of the monopole modes are 1/J_{0}(k_{21}R_{1}) = −2.483 and the coefficients of the degenerate state of dipole modes are zero (β_{11} = 0). For ε_{1} = μ_{1} = 0.001, dipole mode is more dominative than monopole mode. While for ε_{1} = μ_{1} = 0.0001, they are comparable to each other. For ε_{1} = μ_{1} = 0.00001, the monopole mode is more dominative than dipole mode. It seems that the dipole mode is diminishing when ε_{1} = μ_{1} tends to zero gradually. It is not easy for us to choose the required resonant frequency as the resonance goes extremely narrow. For a particular value of near zero permittivity, we can in principle find a frequency near the resonant one where dipole mode is much more dominative than monopole mode.
To demonstrate the hybridization of monopole mode and dipole mode more clearly, we plot the real part of magnetic field distribution inside the defect from x = −0.2 m to x = 0.2 m (at y = 0) with different values of H_{1} for ε_{1} = μ_{1} = 0.001, as shown in Fig. 4. For H_{1} = 1, only the information of monopole mode is observed from the black curve (it is an even function of x). While for H_{1} = i, the information of dipole mode could be observed from the red curve (it is an odd function of x). For H_{1} = 0.707 + 0.707i, both information of monopole mode and dipole mode could be observed from the blue curve. To make it more straightforward, we also plot the amplitude of the magnetic field (see the green curve), which is independent of H_{1} and has two symmetric peaks at the positions of x = 0.1 m and x = −0.1 m because of the existence of dipole mode. If there is only dipole mode inside the defect, the amplitude should be zero at the position of x = 0. However, the amplitude there is a value of about 2.5, which is equal to the amplitude of the monopole mode at the position of x = 0 (see also the black curve). Therefore, both monopole mode and dipole mode exist inside the defect.
As it is known, Diracconelike photonic crystals^{16} can be regarded as MIZIM near Dirac point frequency. It should be possible to produce the above similar effect if we replace MIZIM with such photonic crystals. It is noticed that the incident wave is now a transverse electric (TE) wave and the outer boundaries of the waveguide structure are PMCs. We will show that if a cylindrical defect is introduced in MIZIM or Diracconelike photonic crystals, at the condition of J_{1}(k_{21}R_{1}) = 0 when total transmission occurs, both dipole mode and monopole mode exist inside the defect in the waveguide system ( is the wave vector of light in the defect, ε_{21} and μ_{21} are the permittivity and permeability of the defect respectively, R_{1} is the radius of the defect). Following Ref. 16, the Diracconelike photonic crystals consist of cylindrical alumina rods arranged in a square lattice. The radii of the rods are 3.75 mm with a dielectric constant 8.8. The lattice constant is 17 mm. The Dirac point frequency f is about 10.3 GHz. We set a = h = 0.187 m for the region of photonic crystals in the waveguide and insert a cylindrical defect with a radius of R_{1} = 0.0284 m in the center of the region (the radius should be large enough to visualize the above effect). The dielectric constant of the defect is ε_{21} = 0.3905 and its relative permeability is μ_{21} = 1, to satisfy J_{1}(k_{21}R_{1}) = 0 at the Dirac point frequency. In Fig. 5 (a), we plot the electric field for the system of Diracconelike photonic crystals and choose a suitable phase of the incident plane wave (E_{1} = i) so that only dipole mode is demonstrated in the cylindrical defect. Likewise, we choose another phase of the incident plane wave (E_{1} = 1) and plot the electric field in Fig. 5 (b), where only monopole mode is shown in the defect. For comparison, we replace the Diracconelike photonic crystals with MIZIM and plot corresponding electric field in Fig. 5 (c) and (d). Fig. 5 (c) shows a consistent dipole mode with Fig. 5(a), while Fig. 5(d) gives out monopole mode like that in Fig. 5(b). Therefore we cannot neglect the existence of dipole mode like Ref. 19. Sometime, it is more dominative than the monopole term near the resonance frequency, even for such a realistic photonic crystal system.
For the system of ENZ
After discussing the MIZIM case, we come to the ENZ case. Let us return to Eq. (12). In order to obtain total transmission, the following term must be zero,
For simplicity, we suppose that there is only one cylindrical defect in the ENZ area. After some calculations, we shall have,
If the nth order Bessel function J_{n}(k_{21}R_{1}) is zero, the magnetic field in the defect could be written as,
Therefore, there is not only monopole mode excited inside the defect, but also some other additional higher order mode emerging as well, if both the conditions of Eq. (24) and J_{n}(k_{21}R_{1}) = 0 are satisfied. For example, we choose J_{3}(k_{21}R_{1}) = 0 and tune the configuration and material parameters to satisfy Eq. (24). Following similar calculations to Eq. (19) and (20), we could get the coefficient of tripole mode α_{13} = i^{3}2J_{3}(k_{1}R_{1})/J_{3}(k_{21}R_{1}) and the coefficient of monopole mode α_{0} = 1/J_{0}(k_{21}R_{1}). Likewise, we find the relationship between the parameter α_{13}/α_{0} and different frequencies for three types of ENZ (with ε_{1} = 10^{−3}, 10^{−4}and 10^{−5}) both theoretically and numerically, as shown in Fig. 6. From the analytical results (solid curves), we find that tripole mode is much more dominative than monopole mode at the resonant frequency where J_{3}(k_{21}R_{1}) = 0. For other frequencies slightly deviating from the resonant one, tripole mode is disappearing. When ε_{1} tends to zero gradually, the coefficient of tripole mode will decrease accordingly and the resonance peak will become narrower. However, the resonance frequencies from numerical results have a tiny shift because of the effect of outer PEC boundaries of the waveguide. When ε_{1} tends to zero gradually, the resonance frequency will approach the analytic resonance frequency.
The finding will be confirmed again from numerical simulations. Suppose that there is one cylindrical defect inside the ENZ area. The radius of the defect is 0.01 m, its dielectric constant is ε_{21} = 16 and its relative permeability is μ_{21} = 1. In order to make J_{3}(k_{21}R_{1}) = 0, where k_{21}R_{1} is the first root of the third order of Bessel function, the working frequency should be about 7.615 GHz. In addition, to satisfy Eq. (24), we set the effective permittivity and permeability of the ENZ as ε_{1} = 0.001 and μ_{1} = 0.6 respectively and set a = h = 0.021 m for the ENZ area. The magnetic field distribution for the above system is shown in Fig. 7. The tripole mode is demonstrated inside the defect when H_{1} = i, as shown in Fig. 7(a). Likewise, we can also observe the monopole mode by changing H_{1} into 1, as shown in Fig. 7(b). We numerically find that the coefficient of tripole mode is α_{13} = −1.67i, β_{13} = 0 and the coefficient of the monopole is 1/J_{0}(k_{21}R_{1}) = 4.17 (the tripole mode here is obvious but not dominative, to get a dominative tripole mode, the working frequency should be shift to about 7.61 GHz, as already shown in Fig. 6). Hence, the simulation results prove our finding and the magnetic field is a summation of monopole mode and tripole mode, which should be written as,
In order to further demonstrate Eq. (25), we set J_{5}(k_{21}R_{1}) = 0, where k_{21}R_{1} is the second root of the fifth order of Bessel function. The radius of the defect is 0.01 m, its dielectric constant is ε_{21} = 14.44 and its relative permeability is μ_{21} = 1. In order to satisfy J_{5}(k_{21}R_{1}) = 0, the working frequency is about 15.5 GHz. To meet Eq. (24), we set the effective permittivity and permeability of the ENZ as ε_{1} = 0.001 and μ_{1} = 0.6427 respectively and set a = h = 0.021 m for the ENZ area. Fig. 8 is the magnetic field distribution for the new system when total transmission happens. The pentapole mode comes up inside the defect when H_{1} = i, as shown in Fig. 8(a). By changing H_{1} into 1, the monopole mode shows up inside the defect, as shown in Fig. 8(b). Besides, we numerically find that the coefficient of pentapole mode is α_{15} = 1.83i, β_{15} = 0 and the coefficient of the monopole mode is 1/J_{0}(k_{21}R_{1}) = 8.46. Therefore, the magnetic field is a summation of monopole mode and pentapole mode, which should be written as,
In addition, if only Eq. (24) is satisfied, but none of J_{n}(k_{2 j}R_{j}) is zero, the magnetic field inside each defect is written as,
which is consistent with the result found in Ref. 20. In this situation, only the monopole mode is excited inside each defect.
Discussions
We find some interesting phenomena in ZIM waveguide system embedded with defects when total transmission occurs. For MIZIM case, additional dipole modes, besides monopole modes, could be excited in the defect. For ENZ case, additional higher order modes can also be excited if two particular conditions are satisfied at the same time. We have shown the underlying physics of why higher modes appear. We hope that these phenomena could be observed in experiments in the coming future, considering the current experimental progress on ZIM^{16,32,33}.
References
Smith, D. R. et al. Composite medium with simultaneously negative permeability and permittivity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4184 (2000).
Smith, D. R., Pendry, J. B. & Wiltshire, M. Metamaterials and negative refractive index. Science 305, 788 (2004).
Pendry, J. B. Negative refraction makes a perfect lens. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3966 (2000).
Leonhardt, U. Optical conformal mapping. Science 312, 1777 (2006).
Pendry, J. B., Schurig, D. & Smith, D. R. Controlling electromagnetic fields. Science 312, 1780 (2006).
Chen, H., Chan, C. T. & Sheng, P. Transformation optics and metamaterials. Nat. Mater. 9, 387 (2010).
Schurig, D. et al. Metamaterial electromagnetic cloak at microwave frequencies. Science 314, 977 (2006).
Enoch, S. et al. A Metamaterial for directive emission. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 213902 (2002).
Li, J., Zhou, L., Chan, C. T. & Sheng, P. Photonic band gap from a stack of positive and negative index materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 083901 (2003).
Silveirinha, M. & Engheta, N. Tunneling of electromagnetic energy through subwavelength channels and bends using εnearzero materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 157403(2006).
Silveirinha, M. & Engheta, N. Theory of supercoupling, squeezing wave energy and field confinement in narrow channels and tight bends using ε nearzero metamaterials. Phys. Rev. B 76, 245109 (2007).
Silveirinha, M. & Engheta, N. Design of matched zeroindex metamaterials using nonmagnetic inclusions in epsilonnearzero media. Phys. Rev. B 75, 075119 (2007).
Liu, R. et al. Experimental demonstration of electromagnetic tunneling through an epsilonnearzero metamaterial at microwave frequencies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 023903 (2008).
Edwards, B. et al. Experimental verification of epsilonnearzero metamaterial coupling and energy squeezing using a microwave waveguide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 033903 (2008).
Alù, A. & Engheta, N. Dielectric sensing in εnearzero narrow waveguide channels. Phys. Rev. B 78, 045102 (2008).
Huang, X. et al. Dirac cones induced by accidental degeneracy in photonic crystals and zerorefractiveindex materials. Nature Mater. 10, 582 (2011).
Alù, A., Silveirinha, M., Salandrino, A. & Engheta, N. Epsilonnearzero metamaterials and electromagnetic sources: Tailoring the radiation phase pattern. Phys. Rev. B 75, 155410 (2007).
Hao, J., Yan, W. & Qiu, M. Superreflection and cloaking based on zero index metamaterial. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 101109 (2010).
Nguyen, V. C., Chen, L. & Halterman, K. Total transmission and total reflection by zero index metamaterials with defects. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 233908 (2010).
Xu, Y. & Chen, H. Total reflection and transmission by epsilonnearzero metamaterials with defects. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 113501 (2011).
Wu, Y. & Li, J. Total reflection and cloaking by zero index metamaterials loaded with rectangular dielectric defects. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 183105 (2013).
Zhang, K. et al. Total transmission and total reflection of electromagnetic waves by anisotropic epsilonnearzero metamaterials embedded with dielectric defects. J. Appl. Phys. 113, 084908 (2013).
Luo, J. et al. Realizing almost perfect bending waveguides with anisotropic epsilonnearzero metamaterials. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 221903 (2012).
Yuan, Y., Wang, N. & Lim, J. H. On the omnidirectional radiation via radially anisotropic zeroindex metamaterials. Europhys. Lett. 100, 34005 (2012).
Cheng, Q., Jiang, W. X. & Cui, T. J. Spatial power combination for omnidirectional radiation via anisotropic metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 213903 (2012).
Cheng, Q. et al. Spatial power combination within fanshaped region using anisotropic zeroindex metamaterials. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 141902 (2012)
Luo, J. et al. Arbitrary control of electromagnetic flux in inhomogeneous anisotropic media with nearzero index. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 073903 (2014).
Jin, Y. & He, S. Enhancing and suppressing radiation with some permeabilitynearzero structures. Optics Express 18, 16587 (2010).
Zhu, W., Rukhlenko, I. D. & Premaratne, M. Light amplification in zeroindex metamaterial with gain inserts. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 031907 (2012).
Zhu, W., Si, L. & Premaratne, M. Light focusing using epsilonnearzero metamaterials. AIP Advances 3, 112124 (2013).
Chen, H. L. & Gao, L. Anomalous electromagnetic scattering from radially anisotropic nanowires. Phys. Rev. A 86 (3), 033825 (2012).
Moitra, P. et al. Realization of an alldielectric zeroindex optical metamaterial. Nat. Photonics 7, 791–795 (2013).
Maas, R., Parsons, J., Engheta, N. & Polman, A. Experimental realization of an epsilonnearzero metamaterial at visible wavelengths. Nat. Photon. 7, 907 (2013).
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the National Science Foundation of China for Excellent Young Scientists (grant no. 61322504), the Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of China (grant no. 201217), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 11004147) and the Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.Y.F. and H.Y.C. conceived the idea, Y.D.X. contributed the theoretical analysis, Y.Y.F. performed the numerical simulations. Y.Y.F. and H.Y.C. wrote the manuscript and all authors reviewed it.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder in order to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Fu, Y., Xu, Y. & Chen, H. Additional modes in a waveguide system of zeroindexmetamaterials with defects. Sci Rep 4, 6428 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06428
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06428
This article is cited by

Optical metawaveguides for integrated photonics and beyond
Light: Science & Applications (2021)

Photonic spin Hall effect in PT symmetric metamaterials
Frontiers of Physics (2019)

Asymmetric effects in waveguide systems using PT symmetry and zero index metamaterials
Scientific Reports (2017)

Dirac directional emission in anisotropic zero refractive index photonic crystals
Scientific Reports (2015)

Applications of gradient index metamaterials in waveguides
Scientific Reports (2015)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.