Abstract
Earth's proton aurora occurs over a broad MLT region and is produced by the precipitation of low-energy (2–10 keV) plasmasheet protons. Proton precipitation can alter chemical compositions of the atmosphere, linking solar activity with global climate variability. Previous studies proposed that electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves can resonate with protons, producing proton scattering precipitation. A long-outstanding question still remains whether there is another mechanism responsible for the proton aurora. Here, by performing satellite data analysis and diffusion equation calculations, we show that fast magnetosonic waves can produce trapped proton scattering that yields proton aurora. This provides a new insight into the mechanism of proton aurora. Furthermore, a ray-tracing study demonstrates that magnetosonic wave propagates over a broad MLT region, consistent with the global distribution of proton aurora.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Earth's proton aurora is formed when charged protons precipitate into the atmosphere loss cone, within a few degrees at the equator and subsequently collide with the neutral atmosphere at low altitudes1. Proton aurora can provide important information for understanding magnetosphere-ionosphere interaction by supplementing the direct imaging of the magnetosphere2. Since charged protons are easily trapped inside the Earth's magnetic field due to a minimum magnetic field existing at the equator, such proton precipitation requires a scattering mechanism to break the first adiabatic invariant. In the basically collisionless and tenuous magnetosphere, interactions between protons and plasma waves can induce such non-adiabatic scattering. One important plasma wave, electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) wave can interact with protons and efficiently scatter protons into the atmosphere3,4,5,6. However, strong EMIC waves are present primarily along the plasma plume in the duskside7,8,9 and on the dayside in the outer magnetosphere L > 610,11,12. This appears to be difficult for EMIC wave alone to explain the broad MLT distribution of proton auroral emission from the morning sector to the dusk sector associated with the precipitating protons at lower L-shells. Hence, the fundamental and long-outstanding problem as to what mechanism is primarily responsible for proton auroral emission still remains unresolved. Another important wave, fast magnetosonic (MS) wave, also named equatorial noise13, can resonate with protons, potentially leading to rapid pitch angle scattering of protons. Furthermore, MS waves can propagate eastward (later MLT) or westward (earlier MLT) over a broad region of MLT14,15,16. However, it has not been possible so far to determine whether MS wave is indeed another generating mechanism of the proton aurora, because simultaneous observations concerning MS wave activity, proton pitch distribution and proton auroral emissions are challenging due to extremely difficult observational conditions. Fortunately, such simultaneous observations were serendipitously found in the unique events on September 16, 2003, to identify such mechanism.
Results
On September 16, 2003 an interplanetary coronal mass ejection (CME) interacted with the Earth's magnetosphere, leading to a small geomagnetic storm (Dst ≈ −50 nT). The Cluster spacecrafts, which stayed around the noon near the Earth's equator for about ten minutes then, recorded strong MS wave activities for a duration of ~ 10 minutes in the frequency range ~ 10–150 Hz and around the noon local time sector from 11.47 to 11.41 MLT (Fig. 1a). MS wave is confined within a few degrees of the geomagnetic equator and exhibits a notable harmonic structure, viz., spaced at 4fcp and 12fcp (Fig. 1a). Moreover, MS wave has a normal angle θ ≈ 90° (Fig. 1b) and an ellipticity ≈ 0 (Fig. 1c), implying that MS wave propagates very obliquely with respect to the ambient magnetic field direction17.
Figure 1d shows a pancake distribution of proton flux for different indicated energies (2–10 keV) measured by CIS instrument. Proton flux maximizes at a pitch angle of 90° and drops remarkably at small pitch angles at each energy, particularly for energy above 3.53 keV. Since a pancake distribution is produced when protons with smaller pitch angles have been scattered into the loss cone, any endeavor to identify whether MS waves are really responsible for proton auroral precipitation must also explain the formation of pancake distributions.
Figure 1e–j show auroral snapshots observed by FUV-SI12 instrument onboard IMAGE spacecraft18 for the northern hemisphere and southern hemisphere produced by the precipitation of 2–10 keV protons originating from the plasma sheet. The SI12 instrument detects the Doppler-shifted Lyman-α photons corresponding to precipitating charge-exchanged protons with energies of a few keV19,20. Proton aurora covers a broad MLT region 09:00–18:00 MLT, with stronger emissions roughly in 14:00–18:00 MLT. Such a broad MLT distribution of proton aurora requires MS waves which can produce proton scattering to occur over a similar broad MLT region.
Unfortunately, there is no direct wave data over such a broad MLT region during this event. Here, we adopt the previously developed programs21,22 to trace MS waves with different frequencies based on the wave data (Fig. 1a–b). MS waves are launched at 12:00 and 15:00 MLT for different locations at the geomagnetic equator. The modeled results (Fig. 2) confirm that MS waves can indeed propagate over the similar MLT region from the morning sector to the dusk sector 09:00–18:00 MLT.
Resonant interactions between MS waves and protons take place when the wave frequency equals a multiple of the proton gyrofrequency in the proton reference frame. These cyclotron MS-proton interactions produce efficient exchange of energy and momentum between waves and protons, leading to stochastic proton scattering. Such stochastic scattering can be evaluated in terms of pitch angle and momentum diffusion coefficients induced by cyclotron MS-proton interactions. Then, the dynamic evolution of the proton distribution function can be calculated by solving the Fokker-Planck diffusion equation associated with pitch-angle and momentum diffusion coefficients23. Here, we use this method to model evolutions of the proton distribution following their injection into the magnetosphere.
Calculation of the diffusion coefficients requires a detailed knowledge of the amplitudes and spectral properties of the waves. A standard way is to assume that the wave spectral density obey a Gaussian distribution in wave frequency and wave normal angle24 (see the details in Methods). To allow the data fitting more reasonable, we average the observed wave magnetic field intensity over the indicated time period in this event and then present a least squares Gaussian fit to the observed two-band spectral intensity (Fig. 1a), together with the corresponding fitting parameters as shown in Figure 3. We then calculate bounce-averaged diffusion coefficients for MS waves as shown in Figure 4a–c. All the diffusion coefficients cover a broad region of pitch angle and energy, with high values at lower pitch angles. In particular, the pitch angle diffusion rate above ~ 7 keV can approach 0.01/s around the loss-cone, allowing efficient pitch scattering of protons into the loss-cone in a time scale of tens of seconds. Moreover, pitch angle and cross diffusion coefficients are higher than momentum diffusion coefficients particularly at lower pitch angles, implying that pitch angle diffusion dominates over the energy diffusion while cross diffusion coefficients should also contribute to proton-MS interaction.
Using those diffusion rates in Figure 4a–c, we solve a two-dimensional Fokker-Planck diffusion equation by a recently introduced hybrid difference method25 and calculate phase space density f evolution of protons due to MS waves. We then simulate the evolution of differential flux j by the subsequent conversion j = p2f and extend the results to the range of 90°–180° due to the mirror symmetry. The results (Fig. 4d–f) confirm that MS waves can produce a rapid pitch angle scattering of protons within tens of seconds and substantially modify the entire population of injected protons, leading to the formation of pancake distributions at energies 2–10 keV. It should be mentioned that anomalous depressions (or dips) occur around 90° because of the absence of resonant scattering at (or around) 90°. Moreover, the diffusion rates around 90° are very small in the energy range 1–3 keV and gradually increase above 3 keV. Consequently, those dips around the pitch angle 90° are more noticeable when energy increases (Fig. 4a–c). Although our simulation results are sensitively dependent on adopted model parameters and display anomalous depressions around 90°, the dominant features of Figure 4f are very similar to the Cluster data shown in Figure 1d. Considering that MS waves can propagate over a broad MLT region in this event (Fig. 2), we therefore conclude that MS waves are indeed responsible for the precipitation of energetic protons into the atmosphere, producing the resultant proton aurora (Fig. 1e–j).
Discussion
The simultaneous observation and corresponding modeling presented in this study firstly link MS waves to the origin of proton aurora. Our results definitively demonstrate that, as presented in Fig. 5, MS waves can produce rapid proton precipitation responsible for proton aurora, naturally accounting for the remnant pancake proton distribution left behind in space and the broad MLT distribution of proton aurora. Although our simulations were performed around the noon 11:30 MLT, this conclusion should be valid over the entire region of excited MS waves since the basic properties of MS-proton interaction should not change no matter whether the amplitude and morphology of MS waves are different under different locations.
As shown in Figure 1, the proton auroral emission maximizes in the afternoon sector, which appears to be inconsistent with the recent statistical survey of MS waves observed on THEMIS spacecraft26 that such waves are strongest in the dawn to pre-noon sector. However, the proton aurora emission intensity primarily depends on two factors: the number of the precipitating protons and the MS wave intensity. Since the precipitating protons originating from the plasma sheet drift westwards around the Earth (see Fig. 5), the protons encounter resonance with the afternoon sector MS waves at first, allowing part of protons precipitating into the atmosphere. Then the rest of protons continue resonating with MS waves on other sectors in their drifting. Moreover, the potentially existing plume EMIC waves along the duskside (though not observed directly here) may also contribute to the proton scattering. This probably explains why the proton aurora peak in the afternoon sector, instead of in the dawn to pre-noon sector.
It should be point out that, we use the quasi-linear theory of wave-particle interaction. Analogous to the Particle-in-cell treatment, the quasi-linear theory has been frequently adopted by the space plasma physics and magnetosphere research community to treat wave-particle interaction. The quasi-linear theory is valid by assuming that each individual particle randomly walks in velocity space, resonates with a succession of uncorrelated waves and is scattered in a small amount in pitch angle and energy each time. Those conditions are basically satisfied in the Earth's radiation belts for naturally generated MS waves, where the bandwidth is generally above the proton cyclotron frequency up to the lower hybrid frequency. Moreover, this study is intended to propose a new mechanism of proton aurora by MS-driven scattering, but not to exclude EMIC waves as a potential wave responsible for the proton scattering. The relative contribution to the proton aurora emission from MS or EMIC waves deserves a future study.
Finally, in a departure from the previous works27, we focus on the pitch-angle scattering by the MS waves instead of the instability of MS waves in this study. The enhanced MS waves appear to be excited by those injected anisotropic protons with a typical ring distribution at energies of ~10 keV or above prior to this event. Unfortunately, there is no direct data on MS waves or energetic proton distributions before this event because the Cluster satellite doesn't stay in the radiation belt. We leave the instability of MS waves to a future study.
Methods
The ray tracing of waves is performed by using the following standard Hamiltonian equations28:
where R, ω, k and t represent the position vector of a point on the ray path, the wave frequency, the wave vector and the group time, respectively. The wave dispersion relation D obeying D(R, ω, k) = 0 at every point along the ray path, has well been documented in the previous work. The spatial variation in D can be written:
where B0 is a ambient magnetic field and Nc is the background plasma density.
Here, two Cartesian coordinate systems are adopted for the ray-tracing calculation15,21. The first is Earth centered Cartesian coordinate system (OXYZ), in which Z axis points north along the geomagnetic axis; and the X and Y axes stay in the geomagnetic axis equatorial plane. The second is a local Cartesian system, in which the z axis points along the direction of the ambient magnetic field, the x axis is orthogonal to the z axis and stays in the meridian plane pointing away from the Earth at the equator and the y axis completes the right-handed set. The wave vector k makes an angle θ with the z axis and the projection of k onto the xy plane makes an angle η with the x axis, viz., . η = 0°, 90°, 180° and 270° correspond to the perpendicular component k⊥ pointing away from the Earth, toward later MLT (eastward), toward the Earth and toward earlier MLT (westward), respectively.
For ray-tracing, we adopt a dipole magnetic field model and the global core plasma density model29. Considering that MS wave propagate very obliquely, we choose the initial wave normal angle θ = 88° and the initial azimuthal angle η = 150° (toward earlier MLT) and 30° (toward later MLT). The other ray-tracing parameters for different wave frequencies and source locations are shown in Table 1.
To calculate the diffusion rates, we assume that the MS wave spectral density follows a typical Gaussian frequency distribution with a center fm, a half width δf, a band between f1 and f230.
here Bt is the wave amplitude in units of Tesla and erf is the error function.
We choose the wave normal angle distribution to also satisfy a standard Gaussian form:
where X = tan θ (θ1 ≤ θ ≤ θ2, X1,2 = tan θ1,2), with a half-width Xω and a peak Xm. Based on the observation, we choose Xm = tan 89°, Xω = tan 86°, X1 = Xm − Xω, X2 = Xm + Xω; and the maximum latitude for the presence of MS waves λm = 5°. We assume that the wave spectral intensity remain constant along the dipolar geomagnetic field line.
As shown in Figure 3, there is a cross region between two bands with the cross frequency fcr = 70 Hz. We consider contribution from harmonic resonances up to n = ±20 for the lower band and n = ±30 for the upper band. To avoid repeating calculation from the cross region of two bands, the lower band stops at fcr = 70 Hz; and the upper band starts at fcr = 70 Hz. We then compute MS-driven bounce-averaged diffusion coefficients at the location L = 4.6.
The evolution of the proton phase space density f is calculated by solving the bounce-averaged pitch angle and momentum diffusion equation
here p is the proton momentum, G = p2T(αe) sin αe cos αe with αe being the equatorial pitch angle, the normalized bounce time T(αe) ≈ 1.30 − 0.56 sin αe; 〈Dαα〉, 〈Dpp〉 and 〈Dαp〉 = 〈Dpα〉 denote bounce-averaged diffusion coefficients in pitch angle, momentum and cross pitch angle-momentum. The explicit expressions of those bounce-averaged diffusion coefficients for MS waves can be found in the previous work24,25.
The initial condition is modeled by a kappa-type distribution function of energetic protons31:
here np, l, κ and Γ denote the number density of energetic protons, the loss-cone index, the spectral index and the gamma function. represents the effective thermal parameter normalized by the proton rest mass energy mpc2 (~ 938 MeV).
Solution of the diffusion equation (6) requires to choose the appropriate and realistic initial and boundary conditions in order for a realistic simulation of this event. Boundary conditions in pitch angle are taken: f = 0 at the loss-cone αe = αL (sin αL = L−3/2(4 − 3/L)−1/4) to simulate a rapid precipitation of protons inside the loss cone (Fig. 1d) and ∂f/∂αe = 0 at αe = 90°. For the energy boundary conditions, f is assumed to remain constant at the lower boundary 0.5 keV and the upper boundary 20 keV, respectively.
Based on the observational data, we choose the following values of parameters: , l = 0.01, κ = 3 and np = 2.9 cm−3. We solve the equation using the recently developed hybrid difference method25, which is efficient, stable and easily parallel programmed. The numerical grid is set to be 91 × 101 and uniform in pitch angle and natural logarithm of momentum.
References
Gérard, J.-C. et al. Observation of the proton aurora with IMAGE FUV imager and simultaneous ion flux in situ measurements. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 28939–28948 (2001).
Frey, H. U. et al. The electron and proton aurora as seen by IMAGE-FUV and FAST. Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 1135–1138 (2001).
Summers, D., Thorne, R. M. & Xiao, F. Relativistic theory of wave-particle resonant diffusion with application to electron acceleration in the magnetosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 20487–20500 (1998).
Erlandson, R. E. & Ukhorskiy, A. J. Observations of electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves during geomagnetic storms: Wave occurrence and pitch angle scattering. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 3883 (2001).
Sakaguchi, K. et al. Simultaneous appearance of isolated auroral arcs and Pc 1 geomagnetic pulsations at subauroral latitudes. J. Geophys. Res. 113, A05201 (2008).
Xiao, F. et al. Determining the mechanism of cusp proton aurora. Sci. Rep., 3, 1654 (2013).
Horne, R. B. & Thorne, R. M. On the preferred source location for the convective amplification of ion cyclotron waves. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 9233 (1993).
Jordanova, V. K. et al. Modeling ring current proton precipitation by electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves during the May 14–16, 1997, storm. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 7 (2001).
Chen, L., Thorne, R. M. & Horne, R. B. Simulation of EMIC wave excitation in a model magnetosphere including structured high-density plumes. J. Geophys. Res. 114, A07221 (2009).
Anderson, B. J., Erlandson, R. E. & Zanetti, L. J. A statistical study of Pc 1–2 magnetic pulsations in the equatorial magnetosphere. 1. Equatorial occurrence distributions. J. Geophys. Res. 97, 3075–3088 (1992).
Usanova, M. E., Mann, I. R., Bortnik, J., Shao, L. & Angelopoulos, V. THEMIS observations of electromagnetic ion cyclotron wave occurrence: Dependence on AE, SYMH and solar wind dynamic pressure. J. Geophys. Res. 117, A10218 (2012).
Keika, K., Takahashi, k., Ukhorskiy, A. Y. & Miyoshi, Y. Global characteristics of electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves: Occurrence rate and its storm dependence. J. Geophys. Res.: Space Physics, 118, 4135–4150 (2013).
Santolík, O., Pickett, J. S., Gurnett, D. A., Maksimovic, M. & Cornilleau-Wehrlin, N. Spatiotemporal variability and propagation of equatorial noise observed by cluster. J. Geophys. Res. 107, 1495 (2002).
Meredith, N. P., Horne, R. B. & Anderson, R. R. Survey of magnetosonic waves and proton ring distributions in the earth's inner magnetosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 113, A06213 (2008).
Chen, L., Thorne, R. M., Jordanova, V. K., Thomsen, M. F. & Horne, R. B. Magnetosonic wave instability analysis for proton ring distributions observed by the LANL magnetospheric plasma analyzer. J. Geophys. Res. 116, A03223 (2011).
Xiao, F., Zhou, Q., He, Z. & Tang, L. Three-dimensional ray tracing of fast magnetosonic waves. J. Geophys. Res. 117, A06208 (2012).
Horne, R. B. et al. Electron acceleration in the Van Allen radiation belts by fast magnetosonic waves. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L17107 (2007).
Mende, S. B. et al. Far ultraviolet imaging from the IMAGE spacecraft, 3, Spectral imaging of Lyman-alpha and OI 135.6 nm. Space Sci. Rev. 91, 271 (2000).
Frey, H. U. et al. Proton aurora in the cusp. J. Geophys. Res. 107, 1091 (2002).
Fuselier, S. A. et al. Cusp aurora dependence on interplanetary magnetic field Bz. J. Geophys. Res. 107, 1111 (2002).
Horne, R. B. Path-integrated growth of electrostatic waves: The generation of terrestrial myriametric radiation. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 8895–8909 (1989).
Xiao, F., Chen, L., Zheng, H. & Wang, S. A parametric ray tracing study of superluminous auroral kilometric radiation wave modes. J. Geophys. Res. 112, A10214 (2007).
Thorne, R. M., Ni, B., Tao, X., Horne, R. B. & Meredith, N. P. Scattering by chorus waves as the dominant cause of diffuse auroral precipitation. Nature 467, 943–946 (2010).
Glauert, S. A. & Horne, R. B. Calculation of pitch angle and energy diffusion coefficients with the PADIE code. J. Geophys. Res. 110, A04206 (2005).
Xiao, F., Su, Z., Zheng, H. & Wang S. Modeling of outer radiation belt electrons by multidimensional diffusion process. J. Geophys. Res. 114, A03201 (2009).
Ma, Q., Li, W., Thorne, R. M. & Angelopoulos, V. Global distribution of equatorial magnetosonic waves observed by THEMIS. Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 1895–1901 (2013).
Xiao, F. et al. Magnetosonic wave instability by proton ring distributions: Simultaneous data and modeling. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 4053 (2013).
Suchy, K. Real Hamilton equations of geomagnetic optics for media with moderate absorption. Radio Sci., 16, 1179 (1981).
Gallagher, D. L., Craven, P. D. & Comfort, R. H. Global core plasma model. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 18819–18833 (2000).
Lyons, L. R., Thorne, R. M. & Kennel, C. F. Pitch angle diffusion of radiation belt electrons within the plasmasphere. J. Geophys. Res., 77, 3455–3474 (1972).
Vasyliunas, V. M. A survey of low-energy electrons in the evening sector of the magnetosphere with ogo 1 and ogo 3. J. Geophys. Res., 73, 2839–2884 (1968).
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by 973 Program 2012CB825603, the National Natural Science Foundation of China grants 41274165, 41204114, the Aid Program for Science and Technology Innovative Research Team in Higher Educational Institutions of Hunan Province and the Construct Program of the Key Discipline in Hunan Province.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
F.L.X. and Q.G.Z. led the idea and modelling, Y.F.W. and Z.G.H. contributed data analysis and interpretation, Z.P.S., C.Y. and Q.H.Z. contributed modelling.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder in order to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Xiao, F., Zong, Q., Wang, Y. et al. Generation of proton aurora by magnetosonic waves. Sci Rep 4, 5190 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05190
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05190
This article is cited by
-
Nonlinear kinetic Alfvén-wave localized structures and turbulence generation in the solar corona
Astrophysics and Space Science (2022)
-
Resonance zones for interactions of magnetosonic waves with radiation belt electrons and protons
Geoscience Letters (2017)
-
Effect of chorus normal angle on dynamic evolution of radiation belt energetic electrons
Astrophysics and Space Science (2014)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.