Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A geological perspective on potential future sea-level rise


During ice-age cycles, continental ice volume kept pace with slow, multi-millennial scale, changes in climate forcing. Today, rapid greenhouse gas (GHG) increases have outpaced ice-volume responses, likely committing us to > 9 m of long-term sea-level rise (SLR). We portray a context of naturally precedented SLR from geological evidence, for comparison with historical observations and future projections. This context supports SLR of up to 0.9 (1.8) m by 2100 and 2.7 (5.0) m by 2200, relative to 2000, at 68% (95%) probability. Historical SLR observations and glaciological assessments track the upper 68% limit. Hence, modern change is rapid by past interglacial standards but within the range of ‘normal’ processes. The upper 95% limit offers a useful low probability/high risk value. Exceedance would require conditions without natural interglacial precedents, such as catastrophic ice-sheet collapse, or activation of major East Antarctic mass loss at sustained CO2 levels above 1000 ppmv.


Sea-level rise is a certain consequence of global warming. Throughout ice-age cycles of the past million years, sea levels have fluctuated between ~130 m below and ~10 m above the present level1,2,3. Melt-back of all ice remaining today would cause about 65 m of SLR. Modern society is vulnerable to much smaller changes in sea level4; some 600 million people currently live within 10 m of present-day sea level, in an area that generates 10% of the world's total GDP5. An assessment of 136 of the world's largest port cities estimated that, by the 2070s, the population exposed to flooding risk may grow by more than a factor of three in these cities due to the combined effects of SLR, land subsidence, population growth and urbanization, with asset exposure increasing to more than ten times current levels6. SLR of up to 2 m may displace almost 2.5% of the global population7. Understanding potential future SLR therefore is of utmost importance.

A recent expert assessment inferred a 95% probability range of 0.33–1.32 m of SLR by 2100 for 3.5°C global warming8. An earlier estimate, based on current ice dynamical responses9, inferred a total SLR of 0.8 m by 2100, with an (unlikely) maximum of 2.0 m. The lower estimate relies on two ice-contribution scenarios with realistic accelerations of outlet glacier flow speeds, whereas the high estimate was considered unlikely because it requires an instantaneous jump to high speeds.

Semi-empirical studies have established various relationships between sea level and climate parameters (e.g., temperature, forcing) and have made future projections based on IPCC emission scenarios10,11,12,13. Such studies typically project total SLR ranges between ~1 and 2 m by 2100. Other methods also suggest high future SLR values. For example, Meehl et al14. modelled SLR values for different emission scenarios (representative concentration pathways, RCP15) (Table 1). In terms of rates after 2100, the lowest RCP considered (2.6) gives an SLR rate of 0.15–0.20 m per century (m cy−1) (up to 1.2 m cy−1 at the extreme of the uncertainty envelope)14, while the highest RCP (8.5) gives an SLR rate of ~1 m cy−1 (~5 m cy−1 at the extreme of their uncertainty envelope)14. Currently observed emission rates are close to RCP8.5 (ref. 16).

Table 1 Recent projections14,15 of CO2 levels, global warming and SLR

Discussions of SLR and rates of SLR rapidly become abstract without sufficient context to gauge the plausibility of implicated processes and ice-retreat rates. We assess changes in the natural, pre-anthropogenic past to offer a perspective of what nature has done before and so might do again. Our assessment is guided by two questions. First: is today's climate system in equilibrium with forcing? Second: what are the natural timescales and rates of change in ice-volume adjustment to a disequilibrium state, relative to a forcing increase? We first assess geological data for (approximate) answers to these questions and then use the compiled information in a probabilistic evaluation of the natural context to future SLR projections. Because we assess a wide range of SLR rates and adjustment timescales from available geological evidence, we implicitly consider a natural range of forcing types (orbital, major feedbacks) and rates (up to 1.5 W m−2 ky−1 of annual mean global forcing, or about 3 W m−2 ky−1 of annual mean forcing at high northern latitudes17, where ky stands for thousand years). Anthropogenic rates of climate forcing, close to a global mean of 1 W m−2 cy−1, are much faster than the natural rates considered. For our forward look we assume that – at least – the modern forcing by CO2 levels of 392–394 ppmv is maintained (no reduction). Our aim is to portray the plausible longer-term consequences of naturally precedented SLR rates and adjustment timescales. We then use that context to assess whether modern observed responses are exceptional/unique to the industrial period.


The answer to the first question, whether today's climate system is in equilibrium with forcing, is negative. Anthropogenic climate forcing is more than an order of magnitude faster than climate forcing or major feedbacks at any known time in the Cenozoic18. Key climate-system components, such as deep ocean temperature and ice volume, respond slowly due to their large inertia. Ice-volume contributions to future SLR will therefore reflect delayed responses to GHG emissions, developing climate system feedbacks and future emissions. The large and fast-growing disequilibrium between accelerated climate forcing and slow/lagging response thus creates a strong potential for rapid sea-level adjustments. The current disequilibrium may be evaluated by comparing present-day conditions with geological data that illustrate the likely climate-system state if it had been given sufficient time to respond completely to the change in forcing.

Some studies have evaluated the natural relationship between climate change and sea-level responsee.g.19,20, but continuous, high-resolution sea-level records are needed for a sound observation-based assessment. Rohling et al2. presented such a record and quantified the relationship between sea level and polar temperature21 over the last 500,000 years. They assumed a 2:1 ratio between Antarctic and global mean temperature variability (estimates range from 1.2 to 2.5; refs. 17,22,23) and their dataset for the last 500,000 years was dominated by climates colder than today. To better extrapolate into warmer states, Foster and Rohling24 compiled results from periods both warmer and colder than today, during the past 40 million years (Figure 1). They avoided complications involved in calibrating Antarctic or deep-sea temperature data to global mean temperature, by instead using CO2 reconstructions to compare with sea-level reconstructions. Their dataset includes periods of cooling/CO2 decrease and warming/CO2 increase. For CO2 levels below 600 ppmv, these trajectories appeared indistinguishable, which instils confidence that the CO2:sea-level relationship provides useful information about natural longer-term responses expected for anthropogenic CO2 increases.

Figure 1
figure 1

Sea-level versus CO2 concentrations (and the logarithmic radiative forcing influence of CO2 changes17,28, expressed by ln(CO2/C0), where C0 represents the preindustrial CO2 level of 278 ppmv), after ref. 24.

Symbols represent reconstructions with uncertainties for different intervals of the past 40 million years. The black line and orange envelopes represent a probabilistic assessment that takes into account full propagation of all uncertainties (black line is the probability maximum; dark orange is the 68% probability interval; light orange is the 95% probability interval)24. The relationship averages over orbital configurations. Hence, at any given CO2 concentration, periods with ‘warmer/colder than average’ orbital configurations for the northern hemisphere may have had higher/lower sea level, respectively (e.g., Last Interglacial sea level reached 8–9 m above Holocene values, although CO2 concentrations were similar).

The inferred CO2:sea-level relationship is non-linear (Figure 1). Below ~350 ppmv, sea level increases almost linearly with increasing CO2. The curve then flattens until CO2 reaches 700 ppmv, above which sea level rises strongly again with CO2 increase. The ‘plateau’ for CO2 between ~350 and 700 ppmv, with sea level within a range of 22+13/−12 m above present, likely represents a climate state in which the (relatively sensitive) ice sheets of Greenland, West Antarctica and marine-based parts of East Antarctica were severely reduced or eliminated17,20. The large East Antarctic ice sheet (EAIS) is more stable and only contributes significantly to sea-level change when CO2 is above 700 ppmv. This agrees with modelling of CO2 sensitivity of the EAIS, which suggests a ~700 ppmv threshold25,26. Note that the degree of hysteresis in EAIS growth and decay remains debated; CO2 may need to rise above 1000 ppmv before EAIS contributions to SLR become relevant26,27.

Annual mean CO2 levels reached 392–394 ppmv in 2011–2012. If this level is maintained, then the sea level:CO2 relationship24 suggests a natural longer-term climate state with equilibrium sea level at 24+7/−15 m above the present level (68% probability). This raises our second question, which concerns the timescales needed for such sea-level adjustments. To answer it, we need information about rates of SLR.

It is less straightforward to use geological data to answer the second question because present-day climate change due to rapid GHG emissions is: (a) unprecedentedly rapid18 relative to changes due to orbital forcing and climate system feedbacks17,28 and (b) becoming warmer than a normal interglacial29. Regardless, geological observations can at least provide a sound natural context for modern trends and future projections. Highly resolved sea-level data, as required to quantify rates of SLR, span the five most recent ice-age cycles (~500 ky) (refs. 2,30,31).

Information about rates of SLR is most easily obtained from deglaciations, when ice ages terminated and sea level rose by up to 120–130 m at mean rates of about 1 m cy−1, but with rapid steps bracketed by slower episodes31,32,33,34,35,36,37. During one of these rapid steps (‘meltwater pulse 1a; mwp-1a’), SLR rates reached 4–5 m cy−1 for several centuries36. Rapid steps of > 2 m cy−1 also occurred during previous deglaciations2,30,31,35. Note that past deglacial SLR rates characterise transitions from glacials with 2–3 times the present-day ice volume, to interglacials with ice volumes similar to the present.

Away from deglaciations, data for 75–30 ky ago, when sea level fluctuated between about 60 and 90 m below the present level, reveal rates of SLR when major Northern Hemisphere ice sheets were consistently present (with fluctuating volume). This is a significantly different state than deglaciations. Grant et al31. provided improved age control and uncertainty propagation relative to earlier quantifications38,39,40, which revealed that all phases of considerable ice-volume reduction had SLR rates of 1–2 m cy−1 (comparable with mean rates during deglaciations). This suggests that peak rates during deglaciations may reflect special conditions, but that rates of 1–2 m cy−1 are not exceptional for natural fluctuations. Nevertheless, these rates concern times with much greater ice volume than today and with intense global climate fluctuations17,28,31,41,42,43,44.

The most valuable information on rates of SLR comes from periods when global ice volumes were similar to present. The last five glacial cycles contain two interglacials that were up to 2°C (ref. 45) warmer than the pre-industrial state, with sea level up to 10 m higher than today2,3,30,46,47,48. Few data cover the oldest of these, centred at around 404 ky ago, but the Last Interglacial (LIg; ~130–115 ky ago48) has been extensively studied. LIg global temperature was about 1 ± 0.5°C higher than pre-industrial temperature45 and sea level peaked 6–9 m above the present level46,47,48, which implies a 10–15% ice-volume reduction relative to present. Initial (Red Sea-based) LIg SLR rate estimates of 1.6 ± 1.0 m cy−1 lacked direct age control46. Subsequent studies proposed 1000-year average LIg rates of > 0.26 m cy−1 (ref. 49) and 0.56–0.92 m cy−1 (ref. 47), which is consistent with a 1000-year smoothed estimate of 0.7 ± 0.4 m cy−1 over the −5 to +5 m sea-level range based on improved dating of the Red Sea record31. Note that such smoothing masks brief intervals with more rapid rise. Data from western Australia suggest a rapid rise within the LIg at 0.6 m cy−1 (ref. 50). We infer that LIg SLR likely occurred at sustained rates of ~1 m cy−1 or less.

Here, we capture the (above) compiled geological observations of past rates and also of timescales, of ice-volume/sea-level adjustment in broadly defined probability distributions (Methods; Figure 2). We then develop a probabilistic assessment of SLR and use this natural context to discuss historical SLR trends and future projections (Methods, Figure 3).

Figure 2
figure 2

Probability distributions (red) for: (a). maximum rates of SLR (shown in m y−1, as used in the calculations); and (b). adjustment timescales (in y), as discussed in the text.

The green dots indicate the 2000 random samplings of the probability distributions for our probabilistic assessment of natural sea-level change based on equations 13. Dashed red lines indicate the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles that delimit 95% probability intervals; dashed blue lines indicate 95th percentiles that give the upper bound of the 90% probability intervals (to avoid clutter the lower bound has been omitted); and dashed black lines indicate 16th and 84th percentiles that delimit the 68% probability intervals.

Figure 3
figure 3

Probabilistic assessment of natural sea-level change based on equations 13.

The heavy line is the probability maximum (peak of the probability distribution), the grey envelope marks the 68% probability interval and the dashed blue (red) lines mark the 90% (95%) probability intervals, respectively. (a). Rates of SLR relative to 1700, in m cy−1 (i.e., 100 × result from equation 1). (b). SLR after equation (2). (c). Zoomed-in portion of (b), ending at 2200. The brown wedge is the range of semi-empirical projections by Vermeer and Rahmstorf12, the heavy dot outlines the most-likely projection by Pfeffer et al9. and the heavy dashed black line represents the full range of SLR estimates of Pfeffer et al9. Historical sea-level reconstructions of Jevrejeva et al11. (green dots) and Church and White51 (magenta dots) are also shown. (d). As (c), but zoomed in on 1700–2100.


Within the wide parameter ranges considered (Methods; Figure 2), previous high estimates of about 0.8 to 1.3 m SLR by 2100 refs. 8,9 and historical SLR trends11,51, fall near the upper bound of our 68% probability interval of natural (pre-anthropogenic) change (Figures 3c,d). Semi-empirical SLR projections12 (Figure 3c,d) accelerate in high-emission scenarios to high SLR values from about 2050, but in low-emission scenarios remain close to the upper bound of our 68% probability interval.

The lower half of our 68% probability interval relates to input parameter values that are close to LIg values (see above). Coincidence of recent observations and projections with the upper bound of our 68% probability interval therefore suggests that current SLR responses are high by a natural interglacial standard. However, coincidence with the 0.8 m SLR estimate for 2100 based on ice-dynamics9 suggests that tracking the upper bound of our 68% probability interval does not require unprecedented processes. Here, we note that this 0.8 m estimate9 is based on extrapolation of well-constrained processes for Greenland to a global context, but that proportionally greater contributions might be possible from Antarctica, where marine grounded channels are not well-defined. We also emphasise that, given the multi-centennial timescales of full adjustment (Methods), 0.8 m by 2100 represents a transient mean for the current century along a trajectory toward rates of almost 2 m cy−1 by about 2200 (Figure 3a). LIg data suggest that rapid rates may be sustained at least until SLR reaches +8 to +10 m (i.e., until ~2500 for the upper bound of our 68% interval; Figure 3b).

SLR in semi-empirical projections for high emission scenarios reaches toward the upper bound of our 90% interval (Figure 3c,d). This therefore requires development of: (1) ice-loss processes without known precedents in past warm (interglacial) intervals, leading to eventual rates of SLR of almost 3.5 m cy−1 (Figure 3a) and (2) unexpected increases to modern outlet-glacier flow regimes, relative to the assessment of Pfeffer et al9. This does not mean that such scenarios cannot occur; we only infer from the natural context that such potential developments would be unique to the anthropogenic era.

Given the need for long-term planning in coastal defence, we consider a ‘worst case’ outlook from our natural perspective. The upper bound of our 95% probability envelope (i.e., the 97.5th percentile) implies a 2.5% chance of > 1.8 m SLR by 2100 and > 5.0 m by 2200, relative to 2000 (Figure 3). This 2100 value closely approaches the (unlikely) maximum value suggested by Pfeffer et al9. (Figure 3c). However, this trajectory requires that SLR rates develop toward an eventual value of 4.3 m cy−1, roughly similar to mwp-1a (ref. 36) (Figure 3a), even though today's global ice volume is only about a third of that at the onset of the last deglaciation. Most of the extra ice during glacial times existed in North America and northwestern Eurasia, where it extended to relatively low latitudes (40–50°N). These ice sheets were highly sensitive to climate change, as witnessed by the fact that they existed during ice ages and were almost entirely absent during interglacials. Both the size and sensitivity of these glacial ice masses would have been conducive to high deglacial rates of SLR. Starting from present-day conditions, rates such as those of mwp-1a would require unprecedented ice-loss mechanisms, such as collapse of a major ice sheet (e.g., the largely marine-based West Antarctic Ice Sheet). Alternatively, such rates might develop with a large increase in the amount of ‘vulnerable’ ice, by activation of major EAIS retreat. From the natural perspective, however, the latter only seems to become relevant under extreme GHG forcing, with long-term CO2 above ~1000 ppmv or so (see Figure 1 and discussion above). Without invoking such exceptional conditions or catastrophic events, our assessment supports the notion9 that ~2 m of SLR by 2100 represents a useful upper limit. Improved (less smoothed and globally documented) SLR rate estimates from past interglacials are needed to further refine this value and especially the risk of massive ice-sheet collapse.

Early historical SLR data are scattered because there are few long tide-gauge records, but from ~1880 the record is well defined (Figure 3c,d). While the data generally coincide with the upper half of our 68% probability interval for naturally precedented changes, the observations contain some superimposed multi-decadal variability, for which there are several explanations. Since the 1950s, increased water storage on land behind man-made dams has led to reduced SLR52 and increased volcanic eruptions in the latter half of the 20th century increased atmospheric albedo and reduced ocean heat content, limiting thermal expansion53. In addition, relatively rapid initial SLR may have arisen because proportionally more heat remained in the ocean – where it rapidly caused thermal expansion – while less heat was used for (slower) ice-sheet retreat. Since 1950, this balance may have shifted to reducing contributions from thermal expansion and accelerating ice-volume contributions. The latter interpretation is consistent with observations of recent increasing mass loss from major ice sheets54,55,56. Our evaluations are not designed to reproduce such multidecadal variability, but in a sensitivity test we have included representative annual, interannual and multidecadal variability of differing amplitudes into our 2000 iterations of SLR rates (Supplementary Information Figures S1,S2). This results in only marginal widening of the probability intervals relative to Figure 3 and our conclusions are not affected.

Overall, the most important point from our assessment is that SLR since 1700 has been consistent (within uncertainties) with expectations from geologically documented responses to climate-system disequilibria. Thus, no matter how special anthropogenic climate forcing may be in terms of magnitude and rate of increase, the observed sea-level response to anthropogenic forcing has so far remained close to the range of expectations based on well-known natural precedents.

Continued monitoring of SLR and comparison with the natural context outlined here, may be used to identify if and when sea-level response becomes ‘special’ (i.e., unprecedented during geological interglacials). For example, the higher emissions projections of Vermeer and Rahmstorf12 imply a shift toward such ‘special’ responses from ~2050. Until such time, however, comparison of SLR observations with our results indicates that future SLR projections can rely with confidence on testing and validation of physical models against well-known examples from the recent geological past.


The disequilibrium between rapidly increased anthropogenic climate forcing and slow ice-volume responses amounts to many metres of SLR at current atmospheric CO2 levels and may not change significantly with increasing CO2 to 700 ppmv (Figure 1)24. Temperature adjustments to emission scenarios within that range follow a sigmoidal pattern with time, accelerating and then decelerating, with adjustment timescales between 150 years for low-emission scenarios and 400 years for high-emission scenarios15. We infer that the present disequilibrium is already sufficient to cause build-up toward major ice-sheet responses and that further warming will occur over similar timescales as the developing ice-sheet responses, so that increased forcing would cause (rapid) shifts toward extremes of the parameter ranges considered here (high ultimate SLR rates and rapid adjustment timescales). The median global radiative forcing projections for high-emission RCPs is ~12 W m−2 (ref. 15). For deglaciations, this was 8–10 W m−2 (refs. 17,28). We infer that the long-term consequences of high-emission RCPs may be suitably gauged from the SLR adjustment rates and timescales of deglaciations, if we assume that such consequences would develop via naturally precedented processes (e.g., because the response becomes rate-limited). Similar to a previous study57, we consider that the long-term consequences of low- to middle-emission RCPs may be gauged using LIg responses. We proceed on this basis to formulate our ‘natural context’.

The processes that govern mass-loss from ice sheets build up gradually because of dynamical spin-up or due to slow increases in early melting until ice-sheet height-temperature feedbacks lead to rapid acceleration9,54,58,59. Hence, our assessment allows rates of SLR to gradually build and then accelerate, before settling at the maximum achievable rate for the mechanisms involved (α in our analysis below, in m y−1). We approximate this using a logistic function of the form:

Here γ is the timescale over which the rate increases from zero to its peak value (in y). β is discussed below. The dimensionless scaling constant C is empirically set so that γ equals the period over which d2ΔS/dt2 exceeds 1% of its maximum value. C is independent of α, β and γ; it depends merely on the cutoff criterion used for d2ΔS/dt2. Our consistently applied criterion implies that C = 12 in all iterations. The timing of the central inflection in dΔS/dt, the switch-over from accelerating to decelerating rates of SLR (with the constraint that at AD2000, the SLR rate is 3 ± 1 mm y−1, see below), is tinf = γ ln(β)/C. A histogram for all 2000 iterations (Figure 4) suggests that tinf falls within a window of ~300 years. For comparison, modeled developments from zero to maximum SLR rates from Greenland, over a wide range of climate forcing scenarios, suggest inflection-point timings within a 200-year window (2100–2300) (analysis based on Figure 3b of ref. 59), which is qualitatively similar to our inference.

Figure 4
figure 4

Histogram of tinf, the relative age of the inflection from concave to convex in our 2000 sigmoidal (logistic) SLR rate reconstructions.

Integration of equation (1) gives ΔS (i.e., SLR) in m relative to pre-industrial times (AD1700):

All calculations are performed in m y−1, but we present results in m cy−1 for comparison with previous studies. The dimensionless parameter β is set so that the rate of SLR at AD2000 amounts to 3 mm y−1 (i.e., 0.003 m y−1 or 0.3 m cy−1), with a Gaussian uncertainty distribution over a range of ± 1 mm y−1 (represented by rnd(0.001) in equation 3), based on observations from satellite altimetry for 1993 to present51:

Geological data constrain a broad probability distribution for α. Rates must be > 0 m cy−1 for SLR to occur. The probability peak may be expected at around the rate of LIg SLR above present levels of 0.56–0.92 m cy−1 or 0.7 ± 0.4 m cy−1 (refs. 31,47,50) (i.e., < 1.1 m cy−1), with the caveat that 1000-year averaged LIg estimates may mask shorter episodes with higher values. Mwp-1a, with rates of SLR up to ~5 m cy−1 (ref. 36), provides a real-world example of naturally occurring extreme rates. Accordingly, we formulate a simple lognormal distribution, so that α > 0 m cy−1, with 50% of possibilities for α ≤ 1.1 m cy−1 and with 99% of α ≤ 5.0 m cy−1 (red curve in Figure 2a).

Similar conditions exist for the adjustment timescale (γ). The lower constraint must be γ > 0 y. Where detailed records exist, rates of SLR tracked rates of polar temperature change within a few centuries, while sea-levels tracked a new temperature stasis within 2 to 7 centuries31. However, response times of about a millennium or more may not be excluded59,60. For example, mass-loss rates of the Greenland ice-sheet develop toward maxima over about 750 years in a recent model59. Hence, we define a lognormal distribution so that γ > 0 y, with 50% of possibilities for γ ≤ 500 y and with 99% of γ ≤ 2000 y (red curve in Figure 2b).

Equations 13 are solved in a probabilistic assessment. In a Monte-Carlo style approach, we performed 2000 independent random samplings of the α and γ distributions (Figure 2) and of β (equation 3). Next, we evaluated per annual time-step the probability distribution defined by the 2000 solutions (95% probability limits using the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles, 90% limits with the 5th and 95th percentiles and 68% limits using the 16th and 84th percentiles). Results are shown in m cy−1 in Figure 3a and those for SLR in m (eq. 2) in Figure 3b–d.


  • Rohling, E. J. et al. Magnitudes of sea-level lowstands of the past 500,000 years. Nature 394, 162–165 (1998).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Rohling, E. J. et al. Antarctic temperature and global sea level closely coupled over the past five glacial cycles. Nature Geosci. 2, 500–504 (2009).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Raymo, M. E. & Mitrovica, J. X. Collapse of polar ice sheets during the stage 11 interglacial. Nature 483, 453–456 (2012).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, D. T. Changing Sea Levels. Effects of Tides, Weather and Climate. 280 pp. (Cambridge University Press, 2004).

  • McGranahan, G., Balk, D. & Anderson, B. The rising tide: assessing the risks of climate change and human settlements in low elevation coastal zones. Environ. Urbanisation 19, 17–37 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallegatte, S., Green, C., Nicholls, R. J. & Corfee-Morlot, J. Future flood losses in major coastal cities. Nature Clim. Change 10.1038/NCLIMATE1979.

  • Nicholls, R. J. et al. Sea-level rise and its possible impacts given a ‘beyond 4°C world’ in the twenty-first century. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 13, 161–181 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bamber, J. L. & Aspinall, W. P. An expert judgement assessment of future sea level rise from the ice sheets. Nature Clim. Change 3, 424–427 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, W. T., Harper, J. T. & O'Neel, S. Kinematic constraints on glacier contributions to 21st-century sea-level rise. Science 321, 1340–1343 (2008).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rahmstorf, S. A semi-empirical approach to projecting future sea-level rise. Science 315, 368–370 (2007).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jevrejeva, S., Moore, J. C., Grinsted, A. & Woodworth, P. L. Recent global sea level acceleration started over 200 years ago? Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L08715 10.1029/2008GL033611 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeer, M. & Rahmstorf, S. Global sea level linked to global temperature. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 21527–21532 (2009).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, A. C. Climate related sea-level variations over the past two millennia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11017–11022 (2011).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, G. A. et al. Relative outcomes of climate change mitigation related to global temperature versus sea-level rise. Nature Clim. Change 2, 576–580 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Meinshausen, M. et al. The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extension from 1765 to 2300. Climatic Change 109, 213–241 (2011).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, G. P. et al. The challenge to keep global warming below 2°C. Nature Clim. Change 3, 4–6 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Rohling, E. J., Medina-Elizalde, M., Shepherd, J. G., Siddall, M. & Stanford, J. D. Sea surface and high-latitude temperature sensitivity to radiative forcing of climate over several glacial cycles. J. Clim. 25, 1635–1656 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hönisch, B. et al. The geological record of ocean acidification. Science 335, 1058–1063 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alley, R. B., Clark, P. U., Huybrechts, P. & Joughin, I. Ice-sheet and sea-level changes. Science 310, 456–460 (2005).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, B., Van de Wal, R. S. W., Bintanja, R., Lourens, L. J. & Tuenter, E. Cenozoic global ice-volume and temperature simulations with 1-D ice-sheet models forced by benthic δ18O records. Annals Glaciol. 51, 23–33 (2010).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Jouzel, J. et al. Orbital and millennial Antarctic climate variability over the past 800,000 years. Science 317, 793–797 (2007).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masson-Delmotte, V. et al. Past and future polar amplification of climate change: climate model intercomparisons and ice-core constraints. Clim. Dyn. 26, 513–529 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PALAEOSENS Project Members. Making sense of palaeoclimate sensitivity. Nature 491, 683–691 (2012).

  • Foster, G. L. & Rohling, E. J. The relationship between sea level and climate forcing by CO2 on geological timescales. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 1209–1214 (2013).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DeConto, R. M. & Pollard, D. Rapid Cenozoic glaciation of Antarctica induced by declining atmospheric CO2 . Nature 421, 245–249 (2003).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, D. & DeConto, R. M. Hysteresis in Cenozoic Antarctic ice-sheet variations. Global Planet. Change 45, 9–21 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D. J., Haywood, A. M., Hindmarsh, R. C. A. & Valdes, P. J. Characterising ice sheets during the Pliocene: evidence from data and models. In Williams M., Haywood A. M., Gregory J., & Schmidt D. (eds.).Deep Time Perspectives on Climate Change pp. 517–538 (The Geological Society of London, London, 2007).

  • Köhler, P. et al. What caused Earth's temperature variations during the last 800,000 years? Data-based evidence on radiative forcing and constraints on climate sensitivity. Quat. Sci. Rev. 29, 129–145 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Marcott, S. A., Shakun, J. D., Clark, P. U. & Mix, A. C. A Reconstruction of regional and global temperature for the past 11,300 years. Science 339, 1198–1201 (2013).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rohling, E. J. et al. Comparison between Holocene and Marine Isotope Stage-11 sea-level histories. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 291, 97–105 (2010).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, K. M. et al. Rapid coupling between ice volume and polar temperature over the past 150 kyr. Nature 491, 744–747 (2012).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lambeck, K., Yokoyama, Y. & Purcell, T. Into and out of the Last Glacial Maximum: sea-level change during Oxygen Isotope Stages 3 and 2. Quat. Sci. Rev. 21, 343–360 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, J. D. et al. Timing of meltwater pulse 1a and climate responses to meltwater injections. Paleoceanography, 21, PA4103, 10.1029/2006PA001340 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, J. D. et al. Sea-level probability for the last deglaciation: a statistical analysis of far-field records. Global Planet. Change 79, 193–203 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Siddall, M., Bard, E., Rohling, E. J. & Hemleben, C. Sea-level reversal during Termination II. Geology 34, 817–820 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Deschamps, P. et al. Ice-sheet collapse and sea-level rise at the Bølling warming 14,600 years ago. Nature 483, 559–564 (2012).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, A. E. & Clark, P. U. Ice sheet sources of sea level rise and freshwater discharge during the last deglaciation. Rev. Geophys. 50, RG4007, 10.1029/2011RG000371 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddall, M. et al. Sea-level fluctuations during the last glacial cycle. Nature 423, 853–858 (2003).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arz, H. W. et al. Dominant Northern Hemisphere climate control over millennial-scale glacial sea-level variability. Quat. Sci. Rev. 26, 312–321 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Rohling, E. J., Marsh, R., Wells, N. C., Siddall, M. & Edwards, N. Similar melt-water contributions to glacial sea-level variability from Antarctic and northern ice sheets. Nature 430, 1016–1021 (2004).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dansgaard, W. et al. Evidence for general instability of past climate from a 250-kyr ice-core record. Nature 364, 218–220 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Grootes, P. M., Stuiver, M., White, J. W. C., Johnsen, S. J. & Jouzel, J. Comparison of oxygen isotope records from the GISP2 and GRIP Greenland ice cores. Nature 366, 552–554 (1993).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Rohling, E. J., Mayewski, P. A. & Challenor, P. On the timing and mechanism of millennial-scale climate variability during the last glacial cycle. Clim. Dyn. 20, 257–267 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPICA Community Members. One-to-one coupling of glacial climate variability in Greenland and Antarctica. Nature 444, 195–198 (2006).

  • Hansen, J., Sato, M., Russell, G. & Kharecha, P. Climate sensitivity, sea level and atmospheric CO2 . Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, in press (2013).

  • Rohling, E. J. et al. High rates of sea-level rise during the last interglacial period. Nature Geosci. 1, 38–42 (2008).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kopp, R. E., Simons, F. J., Mitrovica, J. X., Maloof, A. C. & Oppenheimer, M. Probabilistic assessment of sea level during the last interglacial stage. Nature 462, 863–868 (2009).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, A. & Lambeck, K. Ice volume and sea level during the last interglacial. Science 337, 216–219 (2012).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W. G., Curran, H. A., Wilson, M. A. & White, B. Sea-level oscillations during the last interglacial highstand recorded by Bahamas corals. Nature Geosci. 4, 684–687 (2011).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, M. J. et al. Ice sheet collapse following a prolonged period of stable sea level during the last interglacial. Nature Geosci. 6, 796–800 (2013).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Church, J. A. & White, N. J. Sea-level rise from the late 19th to the early 21st Century. Surv. Geophys. 32, 585–602 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, B. F., Wu, Y. H. & Li, Y. S. Impact of artificial reservoir water impoundment on global sea level. Science 320, 212–214 (2008).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Church, J. A., White, N. & Arblaster, J. Significant decadal-scale impact of volcanic eruptions on sea level and ocean heat content. Nature 438, 74–77 (2005).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rignot, E., Velicogna, I., Van Den Broeke, M. R., Monaghan, A. & Lenaerts, J. Acceleration of the contribution of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets to sea level rise. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L05503, 10.1029/2011GL046583 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cazenave, A. et al. Sea level budget over 2003–2008: a reevaluation from GRACE space gravimetry, satellite altimetry and Argo. Global Planet. Change 65, 83–88 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, A. et al. A reconciled estimate of ice-sheet mass balance. Science 338, 1183–1189 (2012).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levermann, A. et al. The multimillennial sea-level commitment of global warming. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 10.1073/pnas.1219414110 (2013).

  • Rignot, E. & Kanagaratnam, P. Changes in the velocity structure of the Greenland Ice sheet. Science 311, 986–990 (2006).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A., Calov, R. & Ganopolski, A. Multistability and critical thresholds of the Greenland ice sheet. Nature Clim. Change 2, 429–432 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, J. M., Huybrechts, P. & Raper, S. C. B. Threatened loss of the Greenland ice-sheet. Nature 428, 616 (2004).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


This paper contributes to UK-NERC consortium iGlass (NE/I009906/1) and 2012 Australian Laureate Fellowship FL120100050. We thank David Heslop for checking the methods and Tom Cronin for helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



E.J.R. led the analyses and writing of the manuscript. All authors added through discussions and reviews of the study, especially A.P.R. and K.M.G. over the past few years of our Red Sea sea-level collaboration. G.L.F. provided a deep-time geological perspective and added Figure 1. I.D.H. added focus on modern implications and assisted with the statistical assessment.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rohling, E., Haigh, I., Foster, G. et al. A geological perspective on potential future sea-level rise. Sci Rep 3, 3461 (2013).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing