Article | Open | Published:

New evidence for early presence of hominids in North China

Scientific Reports volume 3, Article number: 2403 (2013) | Download Citation

Abstract

The Nihewan Basin in North China has a rich source of Early Pleistocene Paleolithic sites. Here, we report a high-resolution magnetostratigraphic dating of the Shangshazui Paleolithic site that was found in the northeastern Nihewan Basin in 1972. The artifact layer is suggested to be located in the Matuyama reversed polarity chron just above the upper boundary of the Olduvai polarity subchron, yielding an estimated age of ca 1.7–1.6 Ma. This provides new evidence for hominid occupation in North China in the earliest Pleistocene. The earliest hominids are argued to have lived in a habitat of open grasslands mixed with patches of forests close to the bank of the Nihewan paleolake as indicated from faunal compositions. Hominid migrations to East Asia during the Early Pleistocene are suggested to be a consequence of increasing cooling and aridity in Africa and Eurasia.

Introduction

Knowing the precise age ranges of early hominid habitation and stone technologies in different regions of the world is a key component for a comprehensive understanding of human evolution. The Nihewan Basin in North China is an intermontane basin about 150 km west of Beijing (Fig. 1). It comprises one of the most detailed sets of Early Pleistocene Paleolithic evidence from the whole of Asia1. Therefore, it has become a major area of archaeological research and a prime focus of investigations into early human evolution in East Asia1,2,3. During the past decades, more than 60 Paleolithic sites associated with thousands of in situ Oldowan-like stone tools (i.e., Mode 1 core and flake technologies) were found in the basin4,5,6. The Nihewan fluvio-lacustrine sediments do not contain material suitable for radio-isotopic dating (e.g., tephra). The exact ages of these Paleolithic sites thus have long been considered controversial. Only recently, reliable ages were assigned to some Early Pleistocene Paleolithic sites based on high-resolution magnetostratigraphy; sites include Majuangou (MJG) dated at 1.66–1.55 Ma7, Lanpo (LP) at 1.6 Ma8, Xiaochangliang (XCL) at 1.36 Ma9, Xiantai (XT) at 1.36 Ma10, Banshan (BS) at 1.32 Ma7, Feiliang (FL) at 1.2 Ma8,11 and Donggutuo (DGT) at 1.1 Ma12. These recently established magnetostratigraphic ages of the Paleolithic sites in the basin have dramatically increased our understanding of early human colonization of 40° N East Asia1,7,9,13.

Figure 1: Schematic map showing the Nihewan Basin and mentioned Paleolithic sites (red triangles) in this paper (modified from Zhu et al.
Figure 1

(2008)21 and Ao et al. (2013)40). SSZ, Shangshazui; XT, Xiantai; XCL, Xiaochangliang; LP, Lanpo; FL, Feiliang; MJG, Majuangou; BS, Banshan; DGT, Donggutuo.

The Shangshazui (SSZ) locality (40°15.3′ N, 114°40.8′ E) was uncovered in 1972 and represents an early documented Paleolithic site in the Nihewan Basin14. During the initial excavation in 1972 only one artifact was found14. It has, however, very clear characteristics of man-made lithic technology (Fig. 2a). It is a single-platform core, which shows at least three flake scars. The detached flakes would have been sufficiently thin and sharp to allow for cutting and scraping. Gai and Wei (1974)14 suggested an Early Pleistocene age more or less equivalent to 1 Ma for the SSZ Paleolithic site based on its Oldowan-like technology. Further excavation in 1975 yielded three blade-like tools, which were made from good quality flints15. According to the blade technology and conventional wisdom that early hominids did not reach the 40° N East Asia before 1 Ma16, the SSZ Paleolithic site was reassigned a Late Pleistocene age later on17. During later excavations in the 1990s and 2000s, more than 20 in situ Oldowan-like stone artifacts associated with some mammalian bone fragments were found. The excavated artifacts include cores, flakes, chunks and retouched pieces. For example, a single-platform core with three flake scars (Fig. 2b), a double-platform core with six flake scars (Fig. 2c) and a multi-platform core with seven flake scars (Fig. 2d) are shown here. Further shown are: 1) two so-called type VI flakes (Fig. 2 e, g) characterized by a non-cortical striking platform (surface surrounding the point of percussion) and non-cortical dorsal (exterior) surface, and 2) one type II flake (Fig. 2f) characterized by a cortical platform and partially cortical dorsal surface18. Most artifacts from the SSZ site are similar to those found in the MJG site with an age as old as ca 1.66 Ma7. Reanalysis of the stratigraphy and stone tools of the SSZ site and recent progress in the paleomagnetic dating of the Early Paleolithic sites in the Nihewan Basin imply that the SSZ Paleolithic site possibly has an Early Pleistocene age. In addition, the SSZ artifact layer also preserves a rich vertebrate fauna, such as Palaeoloxodon namadicus, Equus sp., Coelodonta antiquitatis, Ochotona sp., Struthio sp. and Bos primigenius14,15,19. Based on the fauna, however, both Early and Late Pleistocene ages are possible. Thus a precise age for the SSZ Paleolithic site has remained controversial. In this study, we present a high-resolution magnetostratigraphic record of the SSZ section that hosts the SSZ stone artifact layer, aiming to provide a precise age estimate and to improve our understanding of hominid occupation of North China.

Figure 2: Examples of stone tools from the SSZ Paleolithic site: (a–d) cores and (e–g) flakes.
Figure 2

The SSZ section, the topic of the present contribution, is located at the northeastern margin of the basin; natural outcrop consists of 85.5 m thick fluvio-lacustrine sediments. To extend the magnetostratigraphic record a well was dug down to a stratigraphic level of 92.2 m (0 m stratigraphic level indicates the top of the section). The sedimentary sequence consists mainly of grayish-green and grayish-yellow silty clays and clayey silts, intercalated with silty sand that grade occasionally to coarse-grained and even conglomeratic sands (Fig. 3a). The artifact layer is located in a layer of coarse-grained and conglomeratic sands at 63–64.3 m stratigraphic level of the composite SSZ section.

Figure 3: Lithostratigraphy and magnetostratigraphy of the SSZ section and correlation to the geomagnetic polarity timescale (GPTS).
Figure 3

(a) Lithology, (b) declination, (c) inclination, (d) maximum angular deviation (MAD), (e) virtual geomagnetic pole (VGP) latitude and (f) paleomagnetic polarity sequence of the SSZ section. (g) GPTS22.

We collected 738 oriented block samples from the SSZ section (stratigraphic interval: 5–20 cm). Orientation in the field was done by magnetic compass. Two cubic specimens of 2 cm × 2 cm × 2 cm were subsequently cut from each block sample in the laboratory for thermal demagnetization treatment to isolate the characteristic component of the natural remanent magnetization (NRM).

Results

Generally, the secondary NRM components in the fluvio-lacustrine sediments of the SSZ section are removed by thermal demagnetization to 150–250°C (occasionally up to 300–400°C, cf. Fig. S1). After removal of the secondary overprint, the characteristic remanent magnetization (ChRM) is unblocked during steps up to 680°C. From the 738 demagnetized levels, 462 yield reliable ChRM components (cf. Table S1) based on strict selection criteria: (1) at least 4 (but typically 8–15) consecutive demagnetization steps starting at least at 250°C (with upper temperatures of ≥500°C), (2) maximum angular deviation (MAD) of <15°, and (3) calculated virtual geomagnetic pole (VGP) latitude of >30° (or <−30°)20,21. The remaining 276 samples were excluded, because they have unstable demagnetization trajectories, MAD values ≥15°, VGP latitudes between −30° and 30°, or declinations trending roughly north (or south) but with upward (or downward) inclinations inconsistent with the expected geomagnetic field. These excluded samples are randomly distributed over the section; they are not confined to certain parts. Excluded samples tend to be associated with the coarser grained lithologies; silty sand layers occur frequently in the section (Fig. 3a), this might provide an explanation for the rather high proportion of excluded samples (37%). The 462 reliable ChRM directions result in an antipodal distribution of 131 normal and 331 reversed orientations on an equal area projection passing the reversals test (Fig. S2). Finally, the VGP latitudes from all the 462 ChRM directions are used to establish the magnetostratigraphy of the SSZ section (Fig. 3). Our paleomagnetic results allow us to recognize six main polarity intervals in the SSZ section: three normal and three reversed.

Combining the recent magnetostratigraphic records of the Nihewan fluvio-lacustrine sequences from nearby sections, such as the MJG7, XT10 and XCL9 sections, we can readily correlate the SSZ magnetostratigraphy to the Pleistocene Geomagnetic Polarity Time Scale (GPTS)22. The correlation suggests that the SSZ section records a geomagnetic polarity sequence that spans from the early Matuyama polarity chron to the early Brunhes polarity chron (Fig. 3). The Matuyama–Brunhes boundary is located at 7.6 m. The Jaramillo and Olduvai polarity subchrons are identified at 14.2–18.7 m and 73.7–85.7 m, respectively.

Discussion

Our magnetostratigraphy indicates that the SSZ artifact layer is located in the Matuyama reversed polarity chron just above the Olduvai polarity subchron (Fig. 3). Hence, this does not support a Late Pleistocene age for the SSZ Paleolithic site as suggested by Jia and Wei17. The duration between the lower boundary of the Jaramillo polarity subchron (1.072–0.988 Ma) and the upper boundary of the Olduvai polarity subchron (1.945–1.778 Ma) is ca 706 kyr22; this yields an average sedimentation rate of 7.8 cm/kyr for this interval in the SSZ section. Thus the interpolated age for the SSZ artifact layer (63–64.3 m) is ca 1.65 Ma. This estimate is supported by extrapolation of the average sedimentation rate (7.2 cm/kyr) in the Olduvai polarity subchron. This extrapolation would provide a slightly younger age of ca 1.64 Ma. Taking into account the uncertainties of interpolation and extrapolation (i.e., variable sedimentation rates), we conservatively suggest an age of 1.7–1.6 Ma for the SSZ Paleolithic site. This is much older than earlier age estimates. Possibly because of previously underestimated ages, little attention has been paid to this early found Paleolithic site in the Nihewan Basin. This study, however, establishes an age within the time range of the earliest hominid colonization of East Asia. In particular, the recognition of the Olduvai polarity subchron below the SSZ artifact layer significantly reduces uncertainties in the age estimate and distinctly improves its accuracy. Therefore, our magnetostratigraphic dating of the SSZ Paleolithic site provides new evidence of the earliest hominid occupation in North China prior to 1.6 million years ago. It indicates as well that the blade-like technology may have occurred much earlier (i.e. Early Pleistocene) in the Nihewan Basin than previously known. Actually, similar blade-like tools were also found in the nearby XCL Paleolithic site23 with an age of ca 1.36 Ma9. In addition, it suggests that the SSZ locality should be considered as the first Early Pleistocene Paleolithic site found in the Nihewan Basin. Our revised age of the SSZ Paleolithic site is contemporaneous with the oldest Paleolithic sites7 in the Nihewan Basin (MJG-III with an age of 1.66 Ma and MJG-II with an age estimate of 1.64 Ma7) and only slightly younger than the Yuanmou Homo erectus site (ca 1.7 Ma) in South China21. The notable convergence of age estimates to 1.7–1.6 Ma for the earliest hominid evidence across China indicates that early humans have possibly occupied a vast area in China by 1.7–1.6 Ma (from the Nihewan Basin in North China to the Yuanmou Basin in South China).

Up to now, direct evidence of the climatic and environmental setting of the earliest hominid occupation in the Nihewan Basin (i.e., the SSZ and MJG Paleolithic sites) is not available. However, the associated faunal remains from the SSZ14,15,19 and MJG-III7 sites imply dominant grasslands with patches of woodlands in the Nihewan Basin during the earliest hominid occupation. Five of the six taxa in the SSZ fauna (i.e., Equus sp., Coelodonta antiquitatis, Ochotona sp., Struthio sp. and Bos primigenius) and five of the eight taxa in the MJG-III fauna (i.e., Coelodonta antiquitatis, Equus sanmeniensis, Gazella sp., Pachycrocuta sp. and Struthio sp.) are taxonomically affiliated with typical grazing species indicative of an open grassland environment. Only one species in the SSZ fauna (i.e., Palaeoloxodon namadicus) and two in the MJG-III fauna (i.e., Cervus sp. and Elephas sp.) imply a woodland habitat. Especially the presence of elephants in both faunas is characteristic of a perennial warm and humid climate. In addition, the SSZ artifact layer contains a large number of molluscous fossils, such as Corbicula sp., Bradybaena similaris, Radix auricularia, Bllamya sp., Gyraulus compressus and Parafossatulus striatulus15. The occurrence of numerous mollusks, fine-grained sands and conglomerates in the SSZ artifact layer indicates that the early hominids possibly lived in a lakeshore setting with fresh or semi-saline water. The presence of an intermountainous lake seems to have been a major attraction for early hominid occupation during the Early Pleistocene. First, the lake provided water, and secondly, it would have attracted a substantial range of mammals and other food sources. Furthermore, the mountains and exposed bed rocks at the eastern margin of the Nihewan Basin are envisaged to have been important material sources for making stone tools4,6. Therefore, the Nihewan Basin was undoubtedly an attractive place for early humans, with a fortunate combination of water, food and stones. This line of thought explains why Paleolithic or hominid sites of the Early Pleistocene are usually found near or on lake shores, such as Olduvai and Lake Turkana in East Africa, and in Eurasia: Ubeidiya, Gesher Benot Ya'aqov, Dursunlu, Dmanisi and Nihewan Basin.

The Early Pleistocene dispersal of early humans from Africa, or perhaps from the southern Caucasus24,25, to 40° N East Asia was not only a significant biogeographic event but also a major evolutionary threshold in hominid evolution1,7. These earliest human dispersals were possibly a consequence of climate changes in Africa and Eurasia26. Consistent with the increasing global cooling and aridity during the Pleistocene27, an enhanced shift from closed woodland forest C3 vegetation toward more open arid-adapted C4 savannah grassland vegetation is observed after the Pliocene28,29, associated with increasing arid-adapted faunal compositions30. For example, a trend towards increasing aridity and grasslands was found to peak at Olduvai (East Africa) during the Early Pleistocene31. The decrease in closed woodland forests and increase in open grasslands might have promoted a prominent flourishing and population increase of savanna-adapted hominids in Africa as well as the southern Caucasus. This could have resulted in enhanced competition for food in these areas, which in turn led hominids to migrate into similar savanna settings in East Asia such as the Yuanmou21 and Nihewan basins in China, and Java32,33 in Indonesia. Consistent with the dispersal of Proboscidea out of Africa at 2.5–1.5 Ma34, Hipparion sp. was also found in the Nihewan Basin during the Early Pleistocene35. Therefore, favorable global (especially Africa and Eurasia) climatic and environmental conditions make it not illogical to expect to find hominid emigrants in the Nihewan Basin at ca 1.7–1.6 Ma: similar mixed savanna and woodland habitats as in Africa and southern Caucasus are shown to be present here. Up to now, the ~40° N latitude seems to be the most northerly hominid occupation in East Asia during the Early Pleistocene, because no evidence of Early Pleistocene hominid activities have been found at higher latitudes. From a global perspective, the significantly decreased daylight length and temperature in winter may have significantly limited their further northward expansion during the Early Pleistocene1,36. In addition to the overwintering problem of the 40° N temperate zone, climate and ecology of the Tibetan Plateau may have formed an impenetrable barrier for early hominid colonization and expansion as well. Furthermore, early humans might have inhabited high-latitude Asia only during warm seasons (i.e., they probably avoided cold winters) rather than year-round during the Early Pleistocene36. In contrast, South Asia had relatively fine climate and abundance of food/water resources. This may suggest that early humans dispersed to East Asia from southwest Eurasia possibly via a southern route across the Indian subcontinent, although we cannot exclude the possibility of a northern route1,24,25 at the moment. Additional evidence for hominids in South China during the Early Pleistocene is crucial for clarifying the true dispersal scenario.

Methods

Progressive thermal demagnetization of the natural remanent magnetization (NRM) was conducted using an ASC TD-48 thermal demagnetizer at the Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IEECAS, Xi'an, China) and the Institute of Geology and Geophysics (IGGCAS, Beijing, China). All samples were stepwise heated with 10–50°C temperature increments to a maximum temperature of 680°C, which includes 18 steps of demagnetization. After each demagnetization step, remaining NRM was measured using a 3-axis 2-G Enterprises Model 755-R (in Xi'an) or 760-R (in Beijing) cryogenic magnetometer housed in a magnetically shielded space (<300 nT). The NRM intensity of the samples was usually of the order of 10−4–10−6 A/m, while the instrumental background (or noise) magnetization level in the magnetometer was generally of the order of 10−8–10−9 A/m. Samples were fixed on the tray of a horizontal pass-through magnetometer in groups of eight, and we did not rotate or invert the samples during the measurement procedure in the magnetometer. Only, individual measurements with drift values of <10−8 A/m were used for paleomagnetic analyses; if drift appeared to be higher samples were remeasured. Demagnetization results were evaluated by orthogonal diagrams37; the principal component direction for each sample was computed using a least-squares fitting technique38. The principal component analysis (PCA) was done using the PaleoMag software developed by C.H. Jones39; the least-squares fits included the origin.

References

  1. 1.

    The Palaeolithic Settlement of Asia (Cambridge University Press, 2009).

  2. 2.

    Evidence for the earliest Pleistocene hominid activity in the Nihewan Basin of northern China. Quaternary International 223, 408–417 (2010).

  3. 3.

    , , & New light on the earliest hominid occupation in East Asia. Current Anthropology 46, 115–120 (2005).

  4. 4.

    , & Nihewan Rift and Early Man (Geological Publishing House, Beijing, 2011) (in Chinese).

  5. 5.

    Nihewan (Cultural Relics Publishing House, Beijing, 2006) (in Chinese).

  6. 6.

    , & Paleolithic archeology in the Nihewan Basin (Huashan Literature & Arts Presss, Shijiazhuang, China, 2006) (in Chinese).

  7. 7.

    et al. New evidence on the earliest human presence at high northern latitudes in northeast Asia. Nature 431, 559–562 (2004).

  8. 8.

    et al. High-resolution record of geomagnetic excursions in the Matuyama chron constrains the ages of the Feiliang and Lanpo Paleolithic sites in the Nihewan Basin, North China. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems 13, Q08017 (2012).

  9. 9.

    et al. Earliest presence of humans in northeast Asia. Nature 413, 413–417 (2001).

  10. 10.

    et al. Magnetostratigraphic age of the Xiantai Paleolithic site in the Nihewan Basin and implications for early human colonization of Northeast Asia. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 244, 336–348 (2006).

  11. 11.

    et al. Magnetochronology of the Feiliang Paleolithic site in the Nihewan Basin and implications for early human adaptability to high northern latitudes in East Asia. Geophysical Research Letters 34, L14301 (2007).

  12. 12.

    et al. Magnetostratigraphic dating of the Donggutuo and Maliang Paleolithic sites in the Nihewan Basin, North China. Quaternary Research 64, 1–11 (2005).

  13. 13.

    , & Magnetochronology of the fluvio-lacustrine sequences in the Nihewan basin and its implications for early human colonization of Northeast Asia. Quaternary Science 27, 922–944 (2007) (in Chinese with English abstract).

  14. 14.

    & Discovery of a stone artifact from lower Pleistocene, Nihewan. Certebrata Palasiatica 12, 69–72 (1974) (in Chinese).

  15. 15.

    New discoveries from Nihewan Beds and its significance in stratigraphy., in the Treatises on Palaeoanthropology. Edited by The Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Palaeoanthropology (1978) (in Chinese).

  16. 16.

    The influence of climate and geography on the biocultural evolution of the Far Eastern hominids., in Paleoclimate and Evolution with Emphasis on Human Origins. Edited by Vrba, E. S., Denton, G. H., Partridge, T. C. & Burckle, L. H. Yale University Press, Londong (1995).

  17. 17.

    & Some animal fossils from the Holocene of North China. Certebrata Palasiatica 18, 327–335 (1980) (in Chinese).

  18. 18.

    The oldowan reassessed: a close look at early stone artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Science 12, 101–120 (1985).

  19. 19.

    Recent find of fossil Palaeoloxodon namadicus from Nihewan Beds, NW Hebei. Certebrata Palasiatica 14, 53–58 (1976) (in Chinese).

  20. 20.

    & North American Jurassic apparent polar wander: implications for plate motion, paleogeography and Cordilleran Tectonics. Journal of Geophysical Research 91, 1519–1544 (1986).

  21. 21.

    et al. Early evidence of the genus Homo in East Asia. Journal of Human Evolution 55, 1075–1085 (2008).

  22. 22.

    , & The Neogene Period. in The geologic time scale. Edited by Gradstein, F. M., Ogg, J. G., Schmitz, M. & Ogg, G. Elsevier (2012).

  23. 23.

    On the progressiveness of the stone artifacts from the Xiaochangliang site at Yuangyuan, Hebei. Acta Petrologica Sinica 18, 241–254 (1999) (in Chinese with English abstract).

  24. 24.

    et al. Earliest human occupations at Dmanisi (Georgian Caucasus) dated to 1.85–1.78 Ma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108, 10432–10436 (2011).

  25. 25.

    Did early Homo migrate "out of" or "in to" Africa? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108, 10375–10376 (2011).

  26. 26.

    Environmental hypotheses of hominin evolution. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 41, 93–136 (1998).

  27. 27.

    & A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic δ18O records. Paleoceanography 20, PA1003 (2005).

  28. 28.

    Development of grasslands and savannas in East Africa during the Neogene. Global and Planetary Change 97, 241–247 (1992).

  29. 29.

    & An isotopic study of paleosol carbonates from Olduvai Gorge. Quaternary Research 25, 63–78 (1986).

  30. 30.

    African climate change and faunal evolution during the Pliocene-Pleistocene. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 220, 3–24 (2004).

  31. 31.

    & The expansion of grassland ecosystems in Africa in relation to mammalian evolution and the origin of the genus Homo. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology 207, 399–420 (2004).

  32. 32.

    et al. Early Pleistocene 40Ar/39Ar ages for Bapang Formation hominins, Central Jawa, Indonesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98, 4866–4871 (2001).

  33. 33.

    , , , & Age of the earliest known hominids in Java, Indonesia. Science 263, 1118–1121 (1994).

  34. 34.

    & Proboscidean remains in southern Levant. in The Proboscidea. Edited by Shoshani, J. & Tassy, P. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996).

  35. 35.

    , , , & Timing of the Nihewan formation and faunas. Quaternary Research 69, 77–90 (2008).

  36. 36.

    The Nihewan Basin of North China in the Early Pleistocene: continuous and flourishing, or discontinuous, infrequent and ephemeral occupation? Quaternary International 295, 223–236 (2013).

  37. 37.

    AC demagnetization of rocks: analysis of results. in Methods in Paleomagnetism. Edited by Collinson, D. W., Creer, K. M. & Runcorn, S. K. Elsevier (1967).

  38. 38.

    The least-squares line and plane and the analysis of paleomagnetic data. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 62, 699–718 (1980).

  39. 39.

    User-driven integrated software lives: "Paleomag" paleomagnetics analysis on the Macintosh. Computers & Geosciences 28, 1145–1151 (2002).

  40. 40.

    et al. Magnetostratigraphic evidence of a mid-Pliocene onset of the Nihewan Formation–implications for early fauna and hominid occupations in the Nihewan Basin, North China. Quaternary Science Reviews 59, 30–42 (2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the comments from Prof J. Kirschvink and an anonymous reviewer and suggestions from Profs. R. Dennell, Z.S. An, Q.S. Liu, Y.X. Li and H. Chang. We also thank Drs. H. Zhao and P. Zhang for their help during the field and laboratory work. This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41174057, 41290253).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'an 710075, China

    • Hong Ao
    •  & Xiaoke Qiang
  2. Paleomagnetic Laboratory ‘Fort Hoofddijk’, Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Budapestlaan 17, 3584 CD Utrecht, The Netherlands

    • Mark J. Dekkers
  3. Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China

    • Qi Wei
  4. State Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China

    • Guoqiao Xiao

Authors

  1. Search for Hong Ao in:

  2. Search for Mark J. Dekkers in:

  3. Search for Qi Wei in:

  4. Search for Xiaoke Qiang in:

  5. Search for Guoqiao Xiao in:

Contributions

H.A. designed the study, performed the fieldwork and paleomagnetic measurements, and led the writing of the paper. M.D. and G.X. contributed to data analysis and interpretation. W.Q. contributed to the archaeological interpretations. X.Q. helped with laboratory work. All authors contributed to discussion, interpretation of the results and writing of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Ao.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02403

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.