Space maintainers in the primary and mixed dentition – a clinical guide

A Correction to this article was published on 28 September 2018

Key Points

  • Highlights the important role the primary dentition has on guiding the developing dentition.

  • Warns of the detrimental effects on the developing occlusion that premature loss of primary teeth and resultant space loss can have.

  • Outlines the benefits of using space maintainers and makes suggestion on types of space maintainers to use in different clinical scenarios.


This paper describes different types of space maintainers and the clinical situations where they may be useful, for example, when primary teeth have been lost prematurely. It serves as a clinical guide for practitioners on the best types of space maintainers to use and on the clinical uses of space maintainers in preventing undesirable tooth movements and resulting loss of arch length.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Early loss of upper right second primary molar, removable space maintainer not worn.
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6


  1. 1

    Brothwell D J . Guidelines on the use of space maintainers following premature loss of primary teeth. J Can Dent Assoc 1997; 63: 753–766.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Northway W M . The not-so-harmless maxillary primary first molar extraction. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131: 1711–1720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Ngan P, Alkire R G, Fields H W Jr . Management of space problems in the primary and mixed dentitions. J Am Dent Assoc 1999; 130: 1330–1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Terlaje R D, Donly K J . Treatment planning for space maintenance in the primary and mixed dentition. J Dent Child 2001; 68: 109–114.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Bell R A, Dean J A, McDonald R E, Avery D R . Management of the developing occlusion. In Dean J A, Avery D R, McDonald R E (eds) McDonald and Avery's Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent. 9th ed. pp. 550–613. Maryland Heights, Mo: Mosby Elsevier, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Littlewood S, Tait A, Mandall N, Lewis D . Orthodontics: the role of removable appliances in contemporary orthodontics. Br Dent J 2001; 191: 304–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Laing E, Ashley P, Farhad B N, Dalgit S G . Space Maintenance. Int J Paediatr Dent 2009; 19: 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Guideline on Management of the Developing Dentition and Occlusion in Paediatric Dentistry. Paediatr Dent 2016; 38: 289–301.

  9. 9

    Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Dental Space Maintainers for the Management of Premature Loss of Deciduous Molars: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness, and Guidelines. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, 2016.

  10. 10

    Cobourne M T, Williams A, Harrison A . A Guideline for the Extraction of First Permanent Molars in Children Royal College of Surgeons of England Guidelines. Royal College of Surgeons. 2014. Available at (accessed August 2017).

  11. 11

    Qudeimat M A, Fayle S A . The longevity of space maintainers: a retrospective study. Paediatr Dent 1998; 20: 267–272.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Ahmaad A J, Parekh S, Ashley P . Methods of Space Maintenance for Premature Loss of a Primary Molar: A Review. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2018; Accepted.

  13. 13

    Proffit W R, Fields H W, Sarver D M . Contemporary Orthodontics. 4th edition. St Louis: Mosby, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Kupietsky A, Tal E . The Transpalatal Arch: An Alternative to the Nance Appliance for Space Maintenance. Paediatr Dent 2007; 29: 235–238.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Burstone C J . Precision lingual arches. Active applications. J Clin Orthod 1989; 23: 101–109.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Letti H C, Rizzatto S M, de Menezes L M, Reale C S, de Lima E M, Martinelli F L . Sagittal changes in lower incisors by the use of lingual arch. Dent Press J Orthod 2013; 18: 29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Tunc E S, Bayrak S, Tuloglu N, Eglimez T, Isci D . 2012 Evaluation of survival of 3 different fixed space maintainers. Paediatr Dent 2012; 34: 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Subramaniam P, Babu G K, Sunny R . Glass fibre-reinforced composite resin as a space maintainer: A clinical study. J Indian Soc Paedod Prev Dent 2008; 26: 98–103.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Nidhi C, Jain R L, Neeraj M, Harsimrat K . Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of glass fibre reinforced composite resin as a space maintainer and its comparison with the conventional band and loop space. Minerva Stomatol 2012; 61: 21–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Garg A, Samadi F, Jaiswal J N, Saha S . 'Metal to resin': A comparative evaluation of conventional band and loop space maintainers with the fibre reinforced composite resin space maintainer in children. J Indian Soc Paedod Prev Dent 2014; 32: 111–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Sasa I S, Hasan A A, Qudeimat M A . Longevity of Band and Loop Space Maintainers Using Glass Ionomer Cement: A Prospective Study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2009; 10: 6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Qudeimat M A, Sasa I S . Clinical success and longevity of band and loop compared to crown and loop space maintainers. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2015; 16: 391–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Brill W A . The distal shoe space maintainer: chairside fabrication and clinical performance. Paediatr Dent 2002; 24: 561–565.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Bijoor R R, Kohli K . Contemporary space maintenance for the paediatric patient. N Y State Dent J 2005; 71: 32–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Gill D S . Orthodontics at a Glance. 1st edition. Oxford, England: Blackwell Munksgaard, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Yin Y T J, Lin Y T . Long-term space changes after premature loss of a primary maxillary first molar. J Dent Sci 2017; 12: 44–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Terlaje R D, Donly K J . Treatment planning for space maintenance in the primary and mixed dentition. ASDC J Dent Child 2001; 68: 108–114.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Foley, T F, Wright G Z, Weinberger S J . Management of lower incisor crowding in the early mixed dentition. ASDC J Dent Child 1996; 63: 169–174.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Andreason J O, Andreason F M, Andersson L . Text-book and Colour Atlas of Traumatic Injuries to Teeth. 4th ed. UK: Blackwell Munksgaard, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Fricker J, Kharbanda O P, Dando J . Orthodontic diagnosis and treatment in the mixed dentition. In A Cameron and R Widmer (editors) A Handbook of Paediatric Dentistry. 3rd ed. London: Mosby Elsevier; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Moyers R E, Riolo M L . Handbook of orthodontics. 4th ed. p. 361. Chicago, Il: Yearbook medical publishers. Inc., 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Barberia E, Lucavechi T, Cardenas D, Maroto M . Free-end Space Maintainers: Design, Utilisation and Advantages. J Clin Paediatr Dent 2007; 31: 5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Watt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Watt, E., Ahmad, A., Adamji, R. et al. Space maintainers in the primary and mixed dentition – a clinical guide. Br Dent J 225, 293–298 (2018).

Download citation

Further reading