The development and implementation of a biopsy safety strategy for oral medicine

Key Points

  • Enlightens the reader as to the potential risks associated with oral mucosal biopsies.

  • Demonstrate methods to mitigate the potential risks associated with oral mucosal biopsies.

  • Recommends review of biopsy safety.

Abstract

The development and implementation of a biopsy safety strategy is described in this article. Analysis of previous adverse incidents relating to biopsies acted as a catalyst to review our biopsy pathway at Liverpool University Dental Hospital. Input from all staff involved enabled us to develop a biopsy safety strategy which was divided into five stages: preoperative assessment of patient and procedure, team briefings, biopsy surgical safety checklist, surgical removal and handling of biopsy specimens, and post-biopsy follow-up. It is hoped that other clinical teams will take the opportunity to review their own biopsy processes, in the light of our experience.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1
Figure 2

References

  1. 1

    World Health Organisation. Patient safety curriculum guide, Multi-professional edition. 2011. Available from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44641/1/9789241501958_eng.pdf (accessed October 2017).

  2. 2

    National Patient Safety Agency. Never events framework 2009/10. Available from http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/neverevents/?entryid45=59859 (accessed October 2017).

  3. 3

    NHS England Patient Safety Domain. Revised never events policy and framework. 2015. Available from https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/never-evnts-pol-framwrk-apr.pdf (accessed October 2017).

  4. 4

    Saksena A, Pemberton M N, Shaw A, Dickson S, Ashley M P . Preventing wrong tooth extraction: experience in development and implementation of an outpatient safety checklist. Br Dent J 2014; 217: 357–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    World Health Organisation. WHO Guidelines for Safe Surgery 2009 (Safe Surgery Saves Lives). 2009. Available from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44185/1/9789241598552_eng.pdf (accessed March 2017).

  6. 6

    Oliver R J, Sloan P, Pemberton M N . Oral biopsies: methods and applications. Br Dent J 2004; 196: 329–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    World Health Organization. Conceptual framework for the international classification for patient safety. Version 1.1.–2009. Available from http://www.who.int/patientsafety/taxonomy/icps_full_report.pdf (accessed April 2017).

  8. 8

    Main B G, Adair S R L . The changing face of informed consent. Br Dent J 2015; 219: 325–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Bailey E, Tickle M, Campbell S, O'Malley L . Systematic review of patient safety interventions in dentistry. BMC Oral Health 2015; 15: 152: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Perea-Perez B, Santiago-Saez A, Garcia-Marin F, Labajo Gonzalez E . Proposal for a 'surgical checklist' for ambulatory oral surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 40: 949–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    NHS Improvement. Never Events reported as occurring between 1 April 2015 and 31 March 2016 – final update. 2017. Available from https://improvement.nhs.uk/uploads/documents/NE_data_report_1_April_2015_-_31_March_2016_FINAL_v2.pdf (accessed October 2017).

  12. 12

    Anthes E . The trouble with checklists. Nature 2015; 523: 516–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Russ S J, Sevdalis N, Moorthy K et al. A qualitative evaluation of the barriers and facilitators toward implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist across hospitals in England: lessons from the “Surgical Checklist Implementation Project. Ann Surg 2015; 261: 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Russ S J, Shantanu R, Caris J et al. The WHO surgical safety checklist: survey of patient's views. BMJ Qual Saf 2014; 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002772.

  15. 15

    Criscitelli T . Fostering a culture of safety: The OR huddle. AORN J 2015; 102: 656–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Stratman E J, Elston D M, Miller S J . Identifying and overcoming errors in the skin biopsy pathway. J Am Acad Dermatol 2016; 74: 19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Makary M A, Epstein J, Pronovost P J, Millman E A, Hartmann E C, Freischlag J A . Surgical specimen identification errors: A new measure of quality in surgical care. Surgery 2007; 141: 450–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    National Health Service. Five year forward view. 2014. Available from https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/5yfv-web.pdf (accessed 15 May 2017).

  19. 19

    NHS England patient Safety Domain. National safety standards for invasive procedures. 2015. Available from: https://improvement.nhs.uk/uploads/documents/natssips-safety-standards.pdf (accessed October 2017).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the following members of staff for their advice and support in writing this paper:

Asterios Triantafyllou – Honorary Consultant/ Senior Lecturer in Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool University Dental Hospital

Avril Macpherson – Clinical Director/ Consultant and Honorary Senior Lecturer in Special Care Dentistry, Liverpool University Dental Hospital

Margaret Titherington – Matron, RDN, Liverpool University Dental Hospital

Carla Sudell – Medical Secretary, Liverpool University Dental Hospital

All staff within the Oral Medicine Department at Liverpool University Dental Hospital

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. A. Field.

Additional information

Refereed Paper

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Finn, D., Rajlawat, B., Holt, D. et al. The development and implementation of a biopsy safety strategy for oral medicine. Br Dent J 223, 667–673 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.885

Download citation

Further reading

Search