General anaesthetic service for adult dental extractions: an 'À La Carte Menu'? Survey results

Article metrics

Abstract

The case selection for adult dental extraction under general anaesthesia (GA) is inevitably subjective. A culture of overprescription has implications for patient safety as well as for the limited resources of the National Health Service. We explored the current perceptions and opinions of clinicians in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) units throughout the UK on various aspects of adult dental extraction under general anaesthesia (DGA) service. An email with an electronic survey link was sent to members of the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons and postgraduate dental deaneries. An institutional response rate of 67.3% was reached (241 clinicians of varying grades from 107 out of 159 oral and maxillofacial surgery units in the UK). There was a general consensus that the culture of demand-driven adult DGA exists and needs to be addressed. However, opinions were divided and varied on how this could be achieved. A small majority (58.1%) were in favour of adult DGA guidelines and this group provided suggestions for selection criteria. Those that did not feel such guidelines would improve the situation were pessimistic of the potential for change in patients' attitude towards DGA. This group cited the poor adherence to other existing guidelines, or suggested alternative ideas to guidelines.

Key Points

  • Encourages professional debate about the provision of adult GA dental extraction service amongst dental professionals.

  • Many clinicians in oral and maxillofacial units currently perceive a strong culture of demand-driven adult GA dental extraction, and there is a need to address this issue.

  • Highlights the need to review the current provision of sedation in oral and maxillofacial units in the UK

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1

References

  1. 1

    Enever G . The history of dental anaesthesia. In Shaw I, Kumar C, Dodds C. Oxford textbook of anaesthesia for oral and maxillofacial surgery. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2010.

  2. 2

    Howe L G, Whitehead F I M . The development of local anaesthesia in dentistry. In Howe L G, Whitehead F I M. Local anaesthesia in dentistry. 2nd ed. pp 11–15. Bristol: John Wright and Sons, 1946.

  3. 3

    General anaesthesia, sedation and resuscitation in dentistry: report of an expert working party. London: Department of Health, 1990.

  4. 4

    Landes D P . The provision of general anaesthesia in dental practice, an end which had to come? Br Dent J 2002; 192: 129–131.

  5. 5

    A conscious decision, a review of the use of general anaesthesia and conscious sedation in primary dental care. London: Department of Health, 2000.

  6. 6

    Hastings G B, Lawther S, Eadie D R, Haywood A, Lowry R, Evans D . General anaesthesia: who decides, and why? Br Dent J 1994; 177: 332–334.

  7. 7

    Robertson S, Chaollai A N, Dyer T A . What do we really know about UK paediatric dental general anaesthesia services? Br Dent J 2012; 212: 165–167.

  8. 8

    Hong B, Birnie A . A retrospective analysis of episodes of single tooth extraction under general anaesthesia. Br Dent J 2016; 220: 21–24.

  9. 9

    Sury M R J, Palmer J H M G, Cook T M, Pandit J J . The State of UK Dental Anaesthesia: Results From The NAP5 Activity Survey. A national survey by the 5th National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. SAAD Dig 2016; 32: 34–36.

  10. 10

    Sury M R J, Palmer J H M G, Cook T M, Pandit J J . The state of UK anaesthesia: a survey of National Health Service activity in 2013. Br J Anaesth 2014; 113: 575–584.

  11. 11

    Khalique N . Informed consent: the dawning of a new era. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 53: 479–484.

  12. 12

    Beauchamp T L, Childress J F . Principles of biomedical ethics. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.

  13. 13

    Royal College of Surgeons of England. Faculty of Dental Surgery. The state of children's oral health in England. January 2015. Available at: http://www.rcseng.ac.uk/fds/policy/documents/fdsreportonthestateofchildrensoralhealth (accessed October 2016).

  14. 14

    Jameson K, Averley P A, Shackley P, Steele J . A comparison of the 'cost per child treated' at a primary care-based sedation referral service, compared to a general anaesthetic in hospital. Br Dent J 2007; 203: E13.

  15. 15

    Kim D S, Lopes J, Higgins A, Lopes V . Influence of NICE guidelines on removal of third molars in a region of the UK. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 44: 504–506.

  16. 16

    Sammut S, Lopes V, Morrison A, Malden N J . Predicting the choice of anaesthesia for third molar surgery guideline or the easy-line? Br Dent J 2013; 214: E8.

  17. 17

    Chanpong B, Haas D A, Locker D . Need and demand for sedation or general anaesthesia in dentistry: a national survey of the Canadian population. Anaesth Prog 2005; 52: 3–11.

  18. 18

    General Dental Council. Maintaining standards guidance to dentists on professional and personal conduct. London: GDC, 1997.

  19. 19

    Davies C, Harrison M, Roberts G . UK national clinical guidelines in paediatric dentistry: guideline for the use of general anaesthesia in paediatric dentistry. London: Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2008.

  20. 20

    Adewale L, Morton N, Blayney M . Guidelines for management of children referred for dental extractions under general anaesthesia. London: Association of Paediatric Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. 2011. Online article available at http://www.apagbi.org.uk/sites/default/files/images/Main%20Dental%20Guidelines%5B1%5D_0.pdf (accessed July 2016).

  21. 21

    North S, Davidson L E, Blinkhorn A S, Mackie I C . The effects of a long wait for children's dental general anaesthesia. Int J Paediatr Dent 2007; 17: 105–109.

  22. 22

    Boehmer J, Stoffels J A W, Rooij IALM van, Heyboer A . Complicaties door wachttijd voor behandeling onder algehele anesthesie. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 2007; 114: 69–75.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to BAOMS and postgraduate dental deaneries for helping in the circulation of this survey.

Author information

Correspondence to B. Hong.

Additional information

Refereed Paper

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Further reading