Sir, a 74-year-old patient was referred to the oral surgery department by her general dental practitioner. On consultation, the patient complained of a loose lower complete denture. She reported that she had undergone implant placement some 20 years previously in South Africa and that she had not attended for dental examination since.
Clinical and radiographic examination revealed a subperiosteal mandibular implant (Figs 1,2). The bar was firm and the patient reported that she was experiencing no pain. There were multiple mucosal dehiscences anteriorly and posteriorly, with the exposure of necrotic bone. There appeared to be some deposits of calculus associated with the abutments.
Radiographic examination showed a metal framework spanning the entire edentulous mandible. It sat approximately 2-2.5 mm above the alveolar ridge. Due to the smooth bony border and the even loss across the mandible, this is most likely to be due to continued resorption over time rather than pathological bone loss due to infection. The framework was secured to the bone by four retaining screws: two anteriorly and two posteriorly. The mandible itself was atrophic, with radiolucencies evident around the two anterior retaining screws.
Complete subperiosteal implant placement was first described as a treatment for the atrophic mandible in the 1940s. A mucoperiosteal flap would be raised to allow an impression to be made of the surface of the mandible. CT scans were also used to allow CAD/CAM fabrication of the framework, negating the need for impressions. The framework usually rests on the mandible, with no penetration into the bone.
Due to the high success rates in atrophic mandibles of osseointegrated implants facilitated by the placement of autogenous grafts, subperiosteal implants are no longer used. However, as this case highlights, there may still be some in situ which could present to the general dental practitioner.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beddis, H., Lello, S., Cunliffe, J. et al. Subperiosteal implants. Br Dent J 212, 4 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.6
This article is cited by
-
The burden of dental tourism
British Dental Journal (2022)
-
Structural design and mechanical performance of composite vascular grafts
Bio-Design and Manufacturing (2022)