Main

A.Patel, C.Louca, and B. J.Millar British Dental Journal 2008; 204: E15

Editor's summary

The expression the 'Hollywood smile' is succinctly revealing. It could have been the 'American smile' or the 'actor/actress' smile' but the use of the word Hollywood is key. It implies an image, literally and metaphorically, that has elements of being aspirational, perhaps dream-like, maybe unobtainable, probably glamorous and most of all unlikely for an average non-Hollywood person.

The widespread availability of tooth whitening agents, techniques and materials has changed the aspiration into a reality for many more people and patients than ever before with the result that demand has risen sharply. But if the choice seems bewildering for the patient it is even more difficult for the practitioner who is expected to know which method is best and what the results are likely to be in the short, medium and long term.

This paper begins to clarify the answers and provides a conclusion that readers should welcome in term of being able to give definitive advice to patients. But the very fact that this piece of research has been undertaken is indicative of the way in which dentistry is developing. Taking the definition of cosmetic dentistry as a procedure which enhances the look of the teeth rather than their health, research which investigates the application of this, rather than the ability to treat a disease-mediated condition is also a significant shift, necessary as it might be in terms of knowledge-base and patient safety.

Proponents would doubtless argue that there is an important element of psychological health to be considered in the debate. While there may be very good grounds for such an assertion the underlying trend remains: with improved oral health in general and greater tooth retention into older age, as the need to treat disease reduces, the desire to have the Hollywood smile increases. Does dentistry follow?

The full paper can be accessed from the BDJ website ( http://www.bdj.co.uk ), under 'Research' in the table of contents for Volume 204 issue 9.

Stephen Hancocks, Editor-in-Chief

Author questions and answers

1. Why did you undertake this research?

We were aware of the multitude of tooth whitening techniques currently available and the lack of evidence base to guide dentists when choosing a particular technique for their patients. This has resulted in confusion with current techniques and some uncertainty amongst dentists, particularly revolving around the relative benefits and use of power whitening versus at-home techniques.

We were also aware that patients may not have received the best evidence-based treatment to meet their needs. Much of the dentist's decision making has been influenced by marketing companies who have promoted their whitening systems. Dentists have lacked the evidence base with which to challenge claims by manufacturers when presenting 'in-house' and uncorroborated data.

2. What would you like to do next in this area to follow on from this work?

The present study shows regression of tooth colour improvement over time and this would benefit from further study. A laboratory study over a longer period could monitor this.

A clinical trial based on the same research model as the present study would also be welcome.

Further in vitro study could investigate the use of ozone for tooth whitening in comparison with the agents used in the present study.

Further work could also look at the long term perception of patients undergoing tooth whitening, including the extent and duration of the whitening effect, and how all these factors affect the patient.

Comment

Tooth whitening procedures have received much attention over recent years. This study is timely and topical and should provide very useful information to BDJ readers. Given the precarious position with the legality of tooth whitening in this country it is essential that the lowest possible dosages of carbamide peroxide (hydrogen peroxide) are used for the shortest possible time and that this is evidence-based.

This in vitro study investigated the immediate and longer-term effect of tooth whitening on natural tooth colour using five current whitening techniques with blind matched control groups. Extracted human teeth were treated with either: 10% carbamide peroxide for 60 minutes, 35% carbamide peroxide for 30 minutes or 35% hydrogen peroxide for 30 minutes activated by three sources of energy (diode laser, halogen light, and plasma arc curing light). Tooth colour was analysed using a colorimeter before and after treatment and one week and nine months post-bleaching.

The paper clearly showed that nightguard based vital bleaching with 10% carbamide peroxide is an effective tooth whitening technique and gives support to the growing body of evidence that laser whitening is not justified as an alternative to this procedure, particularly given the temperature rises to the surface of the teeth, the higher risk of post-operative sensitivity and higher cost.