Data Descriptor | Open | Published:

X-ray computed microtomography of Megachirella wachtleri

Scientific Data volume 5, Article number: 180244 (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

Understanding the origin and early evolution of squamates has been a considerable challenge given the extremely scarce fossil record of early squamates and their poor degree of preservation. In order to overcome those limitations, we conducted high-resolution X-ray computed tomography (CT) studies on the fossil reptile Megachirella wachtleri (Middle Triassic, northern Italy), which revealed an important set of features indicating this is the oldest known fossil squamate in the world, predating the previous oldest record by ca. 75 million years. We also compiled a new phylogenetic data set comprising a large sample of diapsid reptiles (including morphological and molecular data) to investigate the phylogenetic relationships of early squamates and other reptile groups along with the divergence time of those lineages. The re-description of Megachirella and a new phylogenetic hypothesis of diapsid relationships are presented in a separate study. Here we present the data descriptors for the tomographic scans of Megachirella, which holds fundamental information to our understanding on the early evolution of one of the largest vertebrate groups on Earth today.

Metadata summary

Design Type(s)
  • morphology-based phylogenetic analysis objective
Measurement Type(s)
  • fossil
Technology Type(s)
  • micro-computed tomography
Factor Type(s)
    Sample Characteristic(s)
    • Megachirella wachtleri
    • skeleton
    • Italy

    Download metadata file

    Machine-accessible metadata file describing the reported data (ISA-tab format)

    Background & Summary

    X-ray CT scanning technology at the micron scale (μCT) is revolutionizing the acquisition and analysis of anatomical data for both extant and fossil species (for examples, see1,​2,​3,​4). In the case of paleontological data, CT scanning enables faster, safer, and more complete data acquisition compared to the usually slow process of rock matrix removal in traditional fossil preparation. Furthermore, small-bodied specimens may be too delicate for extensive mechanical or chemical preparation, and as a result, only part of the specimen can be directly observed. X-ray CT scanning thus becomes fundamental for extracting anatomical data from the rare available fossils of early lepidosaurs5,​6,​7,​8,​9,​10,​11.

    In order to improve the current understanding of the early evolutionary history of squamates and other diapsid reptiles, we performed X-ray μCT scans of the fossil reptile Megachirella wachtleri (Middle Triassic, Italian Alps12,13), which is one of the few well-preserved and articulated lepidosaur species from the Triassic. Additionally, we assembled the largest species level phylogenetic data set of diapsid reptiles, the first one with extensive sampling of squamates (represented by both morphological and molecular data). Our major goals were to obtain the largest and most accurately sampled data library to understand the divergence of lepidosaurian reptiles from other reptile lineages, the earliest stages of the acquisition of squamatan features, and the time of origin of the major diapsid reptile clades (presented in a separate study14).

    The μCT data of Megachirella provides fundamental new morphological information to elucidate the patterns and processes of early squamates evolution, and early diapsid reptile evolution, broadly speaking. Therefore, the data assembled by us will be useful to herpetologists, paleontologists and evolutionary biologists with research programs investigating broad-scale and deep time problems in the evolution of reptiles.

    Methods

    Microfocus X-ray computed tomography

    Megachirella wachtleri is preserved on the surface of a dense, thick and large rock slab (approximately 160 mm long × 120 mm at its widest point × 30 mm deep, weighting 721 grams). The shape and density of the slab make the μCT analysis of the fossil not trivial. Despite the residual noise remaining in the reconstructed images after the procedures adopted for denoising and artefact reduction, a relatively good contrast was obtained between osteological remains and the surrounding matrix. Therefore, most of (although not all) osteological elements could be easily distinguished and separated from the rock matrix and from each other during segmentation.

    The holotype of Megachirella was analysed by microfocus X-ray computed tomography (μCT) at the Multidisciplinary Laboratory (MLAB) of the “Abdus Salam” International Centre of Theoretical Physics (ICTP) in Trieste (Italy), using a system specifically designed in collaboration with Elettra Sincrotrone Trieste (Trieste, Italy) for the study of paleontological and archaeological materials15.

    X-rays are produced by a Hamamatsu microfocus source L8121-03 (150 kV maximum voltage, 500 μA maximum current, 5 μm minimum focal spot size). Two linear translation axes and a high-resolution rotation stage by Aerotech allow precise movements of the samples. The detector used for this study is a Hamamatsu CMOS flat panel model C7942-SK25, featuring a 50 microns pixel size and an active area of 112 × 118.4 mm2. This system design allows different detectors and sample stages to be easily installed depending on the specific scientific application.

    The devices mentioned above are mounted on a versatile mechanical setup, which can be disassembled and transported. In fact, the design philosophy was to develop an instrument that could be transported and installed in museums or in general where important finds are located to perform in-situ analyses of precious samples. Furthermore, this setup has been designed to allow a flexible adjustment of source-to sample and sample-to-detector distances in order to be able to exploit phase-contrast effects if an appropriate detector is used. The integration of software to control the X-ray tube, detector and sample stage motors for the μCT scans was custom-developed.

    This system allows the investigation of relatively large objects (with dimensions up to a maximum width of ca. 20 cm and a weight up to 15 kg) at 40–50 μm voxel size. Smaller objects can be also studied achieving an isotropic voxel size of up to 5 μm. Using this system, the ICTP-Elettra laboratory successfully investigated several paleontological, paleoanthropological and archaeological materials—e.g. Bernardini et al.16; Neenan et al.17; Holgado et al.18; Aráez et al.19; Di Vincenzo et al.20; Fernández-Coll et al.21.

    X-ray μCT acquisition parameters

    An X-ray μCT acquisition of the complete specimen was carried out by using a sealed X-ray tube at a voltage of 150 kV, a current of 100 μA and setting a focal spot size of 20 μm. The X-ray beam was filtered by a 1.5 mm-thick aluminium absorber. A set of 2400 projections of the sample was recorded over a total scan angle of 360° by a flat panel (see previous section) detector with an exposure time per projection of 2 s (Table 1). The tomographic axial slices were reconstructed using the commercial software Digi XCT (DIGISENS) (https://www.digisens3d.com/digi-xct/) in 32-bit tiff format and an isotropic voxel size of 42.5 μm). Additionally, the cranium of Megachirella was re-analysed (voltage 150 kV, current 100 μA, 1 mm-thick copper filter, 3 s exposure time per projection, and acquiring 2400 projections over 360°) setting an effective pixel size of 18 μm and reconstructed using the same software in order to achieve a higher spatial resolution (Table 1).

    Table 1: X-ray μCT acquisition parameters used to scan Megachirella wachtleri.

    Segmentation procedure

    The reconstructed slices for the whole body and skull scans in 32-bit tiff format were converted into 8-bit tiff format using the software ImageJ in order to make total file size feasible to be processed by 3-D rendering software, and so that segmentations could proceed without reaching the limits of the available RAM memory and video graphics.

    The skull of Megachirella was segmented in Avizo v. 9.0 (Thermo Scientific™). The stack of Tiff images (1913 slices, 1728 × 651 pixels) was imported into the software and the Threshold Tool was used to remove as much rock matrix as possible. However, because the density of some of the most delicate bones (e.g. hyoid bones) was very similar to that of the rock matrix, the threshold was chosen so that the former elements would not be affected (Fig. 1). This left some rock matrix that had to be removed via manual segmentation slice by slice.

    Figure 1: Segmentation procedure of the CT scan data of Megachirella wachtleri.
    Figure 1

    (a) Sample slice of the whole-body scan of Megachirella. (b) Sample slice of the head-only scan of Megachirella. Each scan is composed of hundreds or thousands of slices that were subsequently used for individual segmentation procedures. (c) Whole skeleton after segmentation in dorsal view. (d) Whole skeleton after segmentation in ventral view. (e) Skull and mandibles after segmentation of individual components of the head in dorsal view. (f) Skull and mandibles after segmentation of individual components of the head in ventral view.

    Following this preliminary step, the individual skull bones, where possible, were segmented using the Lasso and Brush tools in Avizo v. 9.0 and assigned to different materials. The geometric boundaries of the bones were identified by looking at sections of the skull in three orthogonal planes. Bones that could not be separated due to excessive crushing and unclear boundaries were assigned to the same general material depending on the skull region (e.g. most palatal bones, most bones from the braincase). The segmented elements were then rendered as a surface (through Generate Surface and Surface View modules in Avizo v. 9.0).

    Segmentation of the whole body was executed using Dragonfly v. 1.0 (Object Research Systems (ORS) Inc.™). The stack of Tiff images (1097 slices, 2025 × 921 pixels) was imported into the software and most of the rock matrix was initially removed using quick segmentation (via the “define range” thresholding tool). Subsequently, the advanced analysis tool was utilized in order to remove most of small matrix objects remaining in the quickly segmented object. The third stage consisted of manually removing what was left of the rock matrix slice by slice, with the aid of the 3-D segmentation tool with “define range” activated. The final 3-D visualization of the whole skeleton was also rendered in Dragonfly v. 1.0 (Fig. 1).

    Data records

    Data record 1— The X-ray μCT data reported in this manuscript has been deposited in a Figshare repository (Data Citation 1: figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4157321). The data comprises the tomographic images (slices) of two separate scans: one from the whole body of Megachirella and one focused on the head of Megachirella. The files are in TIF format, and the metadata associated with the scanning procedures and experimental parameters, are available in the log file provided with the image files.

    Technical validation

    The X-ray CT scanner is subject to regular maintenance. This reduces the chances of technical artefacts during the emission of X-rays and capturing of the images. Typical artefacts resulting from CT scanning can include streaking, shading and rings. To reduce some of these effects, ring artefact reduction and beam hardening correction have been applied in order to improve the quality of the reconstructed slices. As a result, no significant artefacts were detected in the resulting images.

    Additionally, depending on the composition of the rock matrix where the osteological remains of fossil vertebrates are preserved, obtaining a significant contrast between fossilized bones and rock matrix can be extremely challenging. Therefore, besides the regular procedure of calibrating voltage, current, and exposure parameters during image acquisition in the CT scanner, contrast in the image slices was further enhanced using the freeware ImageJ22.

    Information obtained from the μCT scans of Megachirella along with our personal observations of the holotype of this taxon were used for the re-description of this species and for the scoring of its anatomical data in the new phylogenetic data set provided by us (see supplementary information in Simões et al.14). It is important to note that Megachirella along with over 75% of other taxa in our phylogenetic data set were scored in the data matrix while observing the specimens in their respective collections. In our experience, this practise increases efficiency and accuracy during data scoring by depending less on the information provided by anatomical drawings, pictures, personal notes and the availability of μCT scan data.

    Usage Notes

    The X-ray μCT scans data slices in TIF format can be imported into 2-D and 3-D image processing, analysis and visualization software packages, such as Dragonfly (http://www.theobjects.com/dragonfly/), Avizo/Amira (https://www.fei.com/software/amira-avizo/), VGStudio Max (https://www.volumegraphics.com/en/products/vgstudio.html), and Pore3D (https://github.com/ElettraSciComp/Pore3D)23 among others. This data set can be used to produce new segmentations or volume mesh files for additional analyses, such as finite element analysis.

    Additional information

    How to cite this article: Simões, T. R. et al. X-ray computed microtomography of Megachirella wachtleri. Sci. Data. 5:180244 doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.244 (2018).

    Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

    References

    1. 1.

      , , & X-ray computed tomography library of shark anatomy and lower jaw surface models. Sci. Data 4, 170047 (2017).

    2. 2.

      , , & Evolutionary origin of the turtle skull. Nature 525, 239–242 (2015).

    3. 3.

      et al. Reacquisition of the lower temporal bar in sexually dimorphic fossil lizards provides a rare case of convergent evolution. Sci. Rep 6, 24087 (2016).

    4. 4.

      et al. Combining geometric morphometrics and finite element analysis with evolutionary modeling: towards a synthesis. J. Vert. Paleontol. 36, e1111225 (2016).

    5. 5.

      et al. Guelb el Ahmar (Bathonian, Anoual Syncline, eastern Morocco): first continental flora and fauna including mammals from the Middle Jurassic of Africa. Gondwana Res. 29, 290–319 (2016).

    6. 6.

      Mesozoic and Cenozoic squamates of Europe. Palaeobio Palaeoenv 93, 517–534 (2013).

    7. 7.

      & A lizard from the boundary of the Middle and Late Jurassic of north-east Fergana. Bull. St Petersb. Univ. Geol. Geog 3, 9–14 (1992).

    8. 8.

      Late mesozoic amphibians and lizards of Soviet Middle Asia. Acta Zool. Cracov 31, 475–486 (1988).

    9. 9.

      Rare bony fishes, terrestrial lizards and mammals from the lagoonal zone of the littoral lowlands of the Cretaceous of the Kyzylkumy. Yearb. All-Uni. Palaeont. Soc. Lenin 28, 199–219 (1985).

    10. 10.

      , , & The oldest known snakes from the Middle Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous provide insights on snake evolution. Nat. Comm 6, 5996 (2015).

    11. 11.

      et al. Integration of molecules and new fossils supports a Triassic origin for Lepidosauria (lizards, snakes, and tuatara). BMC evolutionary biology 13, (2013).

    12. 12.

      & A new lepidosauromorph reptile from the Middle Triassic of the Dolomites (Northern Italy). Riv. Ital. Paleontol. Stratig 109, 463–474 (2003).

    13. 13.

      & Redescription and phylogenetic relationships of Megachirella wachtleri Renesto et Posenato, 2003 (Reptilia, Diapsida). Paläontol. Z 88, 197–210 (2014).

    14. 14.

      et al. The origin of squamates revealed by a Middle Triassic lizard from the Italian Alps. Nature 557, 706–709 (2018).

    15. 15.

      et al. The ICTP-Elettra X-ray laboratory for cultural heritage and archaeology. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 711, 106–110 (2013).

    16. 16.

      et al. Beeswax as dental filling on a Neolithic human tooth. PLoS ONE 7, e44904 (2012).

    17. 17.

      et al. Unique method of tooth replacement in durophagous placodont marine reptiles, with new data on the dentition of Chinese taxa. J. Anat. 224, 603–613 (2014).

    18. 18.

      , , , & A reappraisal of the purported gastric pellet with pterosaurian bones from the Upper Triassic of Italy. PloS ONE 10, e0141275 (2015).

    19. 19.

      et al. New remains of Diplocynodon (Crocodylia: Diplocynodontidae) from the Early Miocene of the Iberian Peninsula. Comptes Rendus Palevol 16, 12–26 (2017).

    20. 20.

      et al. Digital reconstruction of the Ceprano calvarium (Italy), and implications for its interpretation. Sci. Rep 7, 13974 (2017).

    21. 21.

      , , & Cranial anatomy of the Early Triassic trematosaurine Angusaurus (Temnospondyli: Stereospondyli): 3D endocranial insights and phylogenetic implications. J. Iber. Geol. 1–18 (2018).

    22. 22.

      , & NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671 (2012).

    23. 23.

      et al. Pore3D: A software library for quantitative analysis of porous media. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 615, 326–332 (2010).

    Download references

    Data Citations

    1. 1.

      Simões, T. R. et al. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4157321 (2018)

    Acknowledgements

    T.R.S. thanks the Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarships and the Izaak Walton Killam Memorial Scholarship for PhD scholarships. M.B. was supported by the Euregio Science Fund (call 2014, IPN16) of the Europaregion Euregio. NR thanks the Midwestern University Intramural Funds in support of research. OV was supported by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant 327448 to Alison M. Murray and Alberta Ukrainian Centennial Scholarship. MT thanks the National Science Centre for grant 2014/13/N/NZ8/02467. We also thank E. Kustatcher for access to the holotype of Megachirella and several curators that allowed us to have access to all the specimens analysed in this study.

    Author information

    Affiliations

    1. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E9, Canada

      • Tiago R. Simões
      • , Michael W. Caldwell
      •  & Oksana Vernygora
    2. Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E9, Canada

      • Michael W. Caldwell
    3. Department of Palaeobiology and Evolution, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Żwirki we Wigury 101, 02-089 Warsaw, Poland

      • Mateusz Tałanda
    4. MUSE - Museo delle Scienze di Trento, Corso del Lavoro e della Scienza 3, Trento, 38123 Italy

      • Massimo Bernardi
    5. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS81RJ, UK

      • Massimo Bernardi
    6. College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia 5042, Australia

      • Alessandro Palci
    7. South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia

      • Alessandro Palci
    8. Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro di Studi e Ricerche “Enrico Fermi”, Piazza del Viminale 1, 00184 Roma, Italy

      • Federico Bernardini
    9. The “Abdus Salam” International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Strada Costiera 11, Trieste, 34151 Italy

      • Federico Bernardini
    10. Elettra - Sincrotrone Trieste S.C.p.A., SS 14, Km 163.5, Area Science Park, Basovizza, 34149 Trieste, Italy

      • Lucia Mancini
    11. Department of Anatomy, Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, 19555N. 59th Dr., Glendale, AZ 85383, USA

      • Randall L. Nydam

    Authors

    1. Search for Tiago R. Simões in:

    2. Search for Michael W. Caldwell in:

    3. Search for Mateusz Tałanda in:

    4. Search for Massimo Bernardi in:

    5. Search for Alessandro Palci in:

    6. Search for Oksana Vernygora in:

    7. Search for Federico Bernardini in:

    8. Search for Lucia Mancini in:

    9. Search for Randall L. Nydam in:

    Contributions

    T.R.S. conducted phylogenetic data collection; M.W.C. conceived the project; F.B., L.M., M.B., conducted micro CT scanning, T.R.S. and A.P. performed computed tomography segmentations; all authors contributed to writing and discussions.

    Competing interests

    The authors declare no competing interests.

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Tiago R. Simões.

    About this article

    Publication history

    Received

    Accepted

    Published

    DOI

    https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.244