Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Warping an atlas derived from serial histology to 5 high-resolution MRIs

## Abstract

Previous work from our group demonstrated the use of multiple input atlases to a modified multi-atlas framework (MAGeT-Brain) to improve subject-based segmentation accuracy. Currently, segmentation of the striatum, globus pallidus and thalamus are generated from a single high-resolution and -contrast MRI atlas derived from annotated serial histological sections. Here, we warp this atlas to five high-resolution MRI templates to create five de novo atlases. The overall goal of this work is to use these newly warped atlases as input to MAGeT-Brain in an effort to consolidate and improve the workflow presented in previous manuscripts from our group, allowing for simultaneous multi-structure segmentation. The work presented details the methodology used for the creation of the atlases using a technique previously proposed, where atlas labels are modified to mimic the intensity and contrast profile of MRI to facilitate atlas-to-template nonlinear transformation estimation. Dice’s Kappa metric was used to demonstrate high quality registration and segmentation accuracy of the atlases. The final atlases are available at https://github.com/CobraLab/atlases/tree/master/5-atlas-subcortical.

 Design Type(s) source-based data transformation objective Measurement Type(s) nuclear magnetic resonance 3D structure determination assay Technology Type(s) computational modeling technique Factor Type(s) biological sex • functional laterality • Cerebral Hemisphere Sample Characteristic(s) Homo sapiens • brain

Machine-accessible metadata file describing the reported data (ISA-Tab format)

## Background and Summary

The subcortical structures of the brain, such as the striatum and thalamus, are positioned deep below the cortical manifold and serve as important network hubs and relays. Amongst their many roles in brain function, these regions are critically involved in motor function, addiction, and mood regulation13. Further, these structures have multiple reciprocal connections between one another and to regions implicated in complex cognitive tasks such as the frontal cortex3,4, and are amongst the last to mature (as indexed by age of peak volume attainment) through the course of normal development5,6. Despite their importance in daily functioning and implication in neuropsychiatric disorders (such as schizophrenia79 and geriatric depression10,11) and in movement disorders (such as Parkinson’s disease and Huntington's diseases), these regions are under-studied, in part due to the paucity of methods available for accurate visualization and analysis of in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)7,12.

The gold standard for neuroanatomical MR image segmentation is manual delineation by an expert human rater based on prior histological and functional data. However, with the availability of increasingly large MRI datasets1315, the time and expertise required for manual segmentation becomes prohibitive. Automated segmentation techniques, methodologies where expertly manually labelled MRI atlases are warped to target MR images using nonlinear registration methods, are thus actively used in neuroimaging experiments, given that these methods are reliable, objective, and reproducible7,16.

Given the proliferation of automated segmentation tools, a recent study by our group7 sought to establish the validity and reliability of segmentation methods in defining the striatum, globus pallidus, and thalamus using FreeSurfer17 (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu), FSL-FIRST18 (http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk), and MAGeT-Brain16,19 (https://github.com/CobraLab/MAGeTbrain). When comparing manually defined labels to labels generated using each segmentation tool on thirty subjects (15 patients with first episode psychosis and 15 controls), correlations between automated and manually segmented volumes were strongest for MAGeT-Brain7.

The current implementation of the MAGeT-Brain pipeline allows for subject-based segmentation of the hippocampal subfields16,20, hippocampal white matter21, cerebellar lobules22, and the striatum, globus pallidus, and thalamus23. For hippocampal and cerebellar segmentation, five atlases, created from manual segmentation on five high-resolution MRI templates, are used to derive subject-based segmentation2022. However, segmentation of the striatum, globus pallidus, and thalamus are derived from a single input atlas, which was derived from reconstructed histological data warped onto the Colin27 MRI template23. As the basal ganglia and thalamus atlas was created long before our more recent atlases, the resulting difference in input atlas source requires two separate executions of MAGeT-Brain. Thus, reproducing segmentation of the striatum, globus pallidus and thalamus in the same five MRI templates would homogenize our input atlases and accordingly streamline future work-flows, allowing simultaneous multi-structure segmentation.

Moreover, many groups2430, including our own7,16,19,22,31, have shown that multiple atlases improve overall segmentation reliability over model-based single atlas approaches. This is specifically true when using MAGeT-Brain which was designed to facilitate segmentation using a small number of hard-to-define input atlases. Although our group demonstrated reliable segmentation of the striatum, pallidum, and thalamus using a single atlas19,32, we have also shown that multi-atlas segmentation improves segmentation accuracy (and has been seen to plateau) with the inclusion of up to five input atlases, for hippocampal subfield segmentation16, and improved segmentation accuracy for the basal ganglia and thalamus with the inclusion of three MRI templates as input atlases19.

In this paper, we detail the steps used to adapt an existing high-resolution atlas of the basal ganglia and thalamus23 to match five high-resolution MRIs using atlas-to-template warping techniques previously described by our group23,32. The creation and use of five de novo atlases of the striatum, globus pallidus and thalamus, along with three-dimensional surface rendering of these structures will serve as a new set of priors for input into an existing multi-atlas segmentation pipeline, MAGeT-Brain19, with the primary benefit of homogenizing and improving upon its current implementation. MAGeT-Brain with the five newly-created input atlases will provide improved subject-based automated identification and estimation of volume and shape of striatum, globus pallidus and thalamus, and allow for the investigation of subcortical morphology in various subject groups ranging from healthy individuals to patient populations.

## Methods

### Atlas-to-template warping technique

We present a continuation of work previously presented in Chakravarty et al. (2006), which describes the creation of an atlas of the basal ganglia and thalamus derived from serial histological data, detailing 108 structures23. The brain used to create the histological data set was acquired in 1957 from a male patient who died of non-neurological causes at the Montreal Neurological Institute/Hospital, in which is intensively studied and used for teaching over the past 45 years. The histological images were manually segmented and labeled combining information and nomenclature using three different references3335. Each image has a center-to-center voxel spacing of 0.034 mm×0.034 mm and a slice-to-slice spacing of 0.7 mm. Serial histological sections were reconstructed into a contiguous 3D volume using a slice-to-slice nonlinear registration technique which minimizes anatomic mis-registration throughout the reconstructed data set and an intensity correction scheme which analyzes local neighborhoods on each slice in order to build a voxel-by-voxel multiplicative field to correct for local variations in image intensities between slices. The reconstructed volume was registered to a standard MRI data set using a novel atlas-to-template warping technique, described in Chakravarty et al. (2006, 2008). This methodology is described in detail in previous work23,32 and was validated against manual segmentation23,36, intraoperative recordings32, and functional MRI activations37,38.

High-resolution T1-weighted images used for the creation of five subcortical atlases were acquired from 5 healthy subjects (2 male, 3 female, aged 29–57, average age of 37 years)20. All images were acquired on a 3 T GE Discovery MR 750 system (General Electric, Milwaukee, WI) at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) in Toronto, Canada using an 8-channel head coil. Three sets of high-resolution T1-weighted images were acquired from each subject. T1-weighted images were acquired using the 3D inversion-prepared fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo acquisition (FSPGR-BRAVO; TE/TR=4.3 ms/9.2 ms, TI=650 ms, α=8°, 2NEX, FOV=22 cm, slice thickness=0.6 mm, 384×384 in-plane steps) with an isotropic voxel size of 0.6 mm. A final isotropic voxel size of 0.3 mm was obtained using zero-filling reconstruction filters, ZIPX2 and ZIP512, done on the GE scanner. For each subject, the three T1-weighted images were each corrected for RF inhomogeneity non-uniformity39 and normalized to a fixed intensity range (0–10,000) on a voxel-by-voxel basis to enhance signal and contrast40 to ultimately produce one final T1-weighted image volume. The final T1-weighted image volume was produced from the average of the three corrected MR images for each subject using a rigid-body alignment41. All images were converted to the MINC file format and subsequent image processing and neuroanatomical labeling was performed using tools from the MINC software distribution (http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/ServicesSoftware/HomePage). The data acquisition was approved by the Centre for Addiciton and Mental Health Research Ethics Board, and all subjects provided written, informed consent for data acquisition and sharing. These templates were previously used by our group for the creation of atlases of the hippocampal subfields16,20, hippocampal white matter21, and the cerebellum22.

The atlas-to-template warping technique used here for the creation of five atlases was initiated with linear registration of the histologically-derived atlas to five T1-weighted high-resolution MRI templates20 (as described in Chakravarty et al. (2006)). By identifying homologous landmark-pairs, linear transformations are estimated to map the atlas to each MRI using a 12-parameter transformation (3 of each of translations, rotations, scales, and shears). After accounting for global differences with the linear registration, the remaining morphological differences between the atlas and the templates were accounted for using nonlinear registration to further refine the fit between the atlas and each template. However, the inherent differences in contrast and morphology presents a challenge for customization of the histology-derived atlas to MRI templates. To account for these differences, pseudo-MRIs were created by manually assigning an intensity value to each label value of the atlas based on the intensity of the matching structure in MRI template for which it is registered to. This remapping of the atlas labels to match the intensity profile of the templates allows the nonlinear registration algorithm to treat the atlas as a standard input MRI. Figure 1 details an overview of the atlas-to-template warping technique, from linear transform to pseudo-MRI to final fit.

The nonlinear registration was performed using the automatic nonlinear image matching and automatic labeling algorithm (ANIMAL)42,43 to register the pseudo-MRIs to the MRI templates. This nonlinear transformation is estimated in a hierarchical fashion, where large deformations are estimated using volumes blurred with a Gaussian kernel with a large full-width at half maximum (FWHM), which gets progressively smaller to refine deformations, to optimize a transformation that maximizes the similarity between the source and target image. The final nonlinear transformation is represented by a deformation field (defined by vectors spaced on a grid representing a three-dimensional translation at each node of the lattice grid) that is iteratively estimated in a two step process; the first step involves the calculation of local translations for each node that optimizes a local objective function (the correlation coefficient) and the second is a regularization step to ensure that the deformation field is continuous. The definition of the final deformation field produced by ANIMAL’s two-step algorithm is dependent upon the step size (the spacing between the lattice points of the grid), sublattice diameter (the diameter of a local spherical neighbourhood around each node in which the deformation is estimated) and the sublattice (number of nodes contained within a local spherical neighbourhood)32,40,42. Additionally, three regularization parameters are used to improve the quality of the nonlinear transformation estimated, where the weight parameter determines the proportion of each local translation estimated at each iteration that will be used at the next iteration, the stiffness parameter is the smoothing factor between iterations (to ensure continuity), and the similarity-cost ratio parameter balances the similarity between the volumes with the cost of the transformation32,40,42,43. The parameters used to calculate the atlas-to-template transformation using ANIMAL are given in Table 1. The final transformation was achieved through an optimization of a correlation coefficient objective function, and described in Collins & Evans (1997) and Chakravarty et al. (2006, 2008). Other nonlinear registration algorithms were attempted, and are discussed in section “Nonlinear Registration Algorithms”.

### Atlas warping evaluation

The atlas-to-template warping technique presented in section “Atlas-to-template warping technique” was evaluated against manual segmentation of the striatum, globus pallidus, and thalamus to validate the accuracy of the atlas labels before using these atlases as input to the MAGeT-Brain pipeline.

### Dice’s Kappa Overlap Metric

The labels defined in the atlas were compared to manual segmentation to determine the accuracy of the atlas-to-template warping technique. Dice similarity coefficient (also referred to as Dice's Kappa) (κ) metric is used here to evaluate the quality of the overlap of the atlas labels derived from the atlas-to-template warping technique with manual segmentation, as this segmentation method is the current gold-standard method. The Dice’s Kappa overlap metric score is determined by:

$\kappa =\mathrm{2a}/\left(\mathrm{2a}+\mathrm{b}+\mathrm{c}\right)$

where a is the number of voxels common to both methods of segmentation, and b+c is the sum of the voxels uniquely labeled by each segmentation method. A higher Kappa value denotes a higher degree of overlap, where a score of 0 represents no overlap and a value of 1 represents perfect overlap, and scores greater than 0.7 are deemed acceptable in the segmentation literature32,4446.

### Manual Segmentations

To evaluate the ‘‘goodness of fit” of atlas labels, segmentations of the striatum, globus pallidus, and thalamus, were generated using MAGeT-Brain segmentation19 using the current single input atlas by one of the authors (M.T.M.P.) to obtain labels on the five high-resolution T1 weighted images. Subsequently, these labels were manually corrected, particularly in regions where the endogenous contrast boundaries are not as distinct. These semi-manual segmentation were then used to evaluate segmentation accuracy of the atlas labels.

### Surface Representations

A single surface-based representation of the striatum, globus pallidus and thalamus are defined on a model atlas. The model was created using atlas-creation methods described previously4749. Briefly, one of the five MR templates is selected as the target, and the other four templates are registered in a 6-parameter (3 translations and 3 rotations) linear registration to this target (carried out using ANTs for MINC formatted images). These images are then registered to each other on a pairwise basis using a 12-parameter linear registration (3 translations, 3 rotations, 3 scales, and 3 shears), and resampled to normalize each image for average linear brain size. The resampled images are then averaged to create an initial model (M0). Next, the resampled images are non-linearly registered to M0 using ANTs, resampled again, and averaged to create M1. This step is repeated twice more, with each additional step improving the accuracy of the model in representing the mean anatomy of the five original atlases50. This model atlas provides an averaged neuroanatomical representation of the five atlases for the striatum, globus pallidus and thalamus. The model atlas labels were generated using a majority voting label fusion technique. This atlas has superior contrast, signal, and definition when compared to a single atlas, and most importantly provides a common space for analysis of surface-based metrics generated by the MAGeT-Brain pipeline50. Using this model atlas, the striatum, globus pallidus and thalamus were extracted as objects using the marching cubes algorithm in the Display software (part of the MINCtools package, http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/ServicesSoftware/HomePage) to obtain a 3D triangular mesh for each structure bilaterally. These meshes were subsequently manually smoothed using the MeshLab open source system for processing and editing 3D triangular meshes51. After manual smoothing, the objects were re-meshed at approximately 0.3 mm vertex-to-vertex spacing on the surface to match the voxel size of the atlases (and consequently, matching the deformation grids from MAGeT-Brain), and an additional quadratic space smoothing was performed52. The resulting surfaces have approximately 13000 vertices per striatum, 3000 vertices per globus pallidus, and 6500 vertices per thalamus. The model atlas with surface representations of the striatum, globus pallidus, and thalamus are shown in Figure 2.

The surface representations of the striatum, globus pallidus and thalamus were created to obtain surface-based metrics, including surface area and displacement for shape analysis, using the MAGeT-Brain pipeline. This methodology is described in detail in previous work by our group6,7,16,31.

### Code availability

The atlases were created using tools from the MINC software distribution (http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/ServicesSoftware/HomePage); however, NIfTI format (https://nifti.nimh.nih.gov/pub/dist/src/niftilib/nifti1.h) is also availble on our Figshare repository (Data Citation 1). The conversion from MINC to NIfTI-1 format was performed using mnc2nii (part of the MINCtools package: http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/ServicesSoftware/HomePage).

The code for creation of the atlases is accessible through our Figshare repository (Data Citation 1). The ANIMAL script details the commands for the nonlinear registration step of the atlas-to-template warping technique. The resulting atlases contain 108 subcortical structures, all of the structures present in the histologically-derived atlas23 (Data Citation 1). The final atlases of the striatum, globus pallidus and thalamus, in which will be used as input atlases for the automated segmentation pipeline MAGeT-Brain, were generated using the mask script, also available in our Figshare repository (Data Citation 1).

MAGeT-Brain (https://github.com/CobraLab/MAGeTbrain), the automated segmentation pipeline, for which these atlases will be used as input to derive subject-based segmentation of the striatum, globus pallidus, and thalamus, is supported on the BIDS app (https://github.com/BIDS-Apps/MAGeTbrain) and OpenNeuro (reproducibility.stanford.edu/openneuro-app-highlights-maget-brain/), in addition to being available as an open source tool from our website (http://cobralab.ca/software/MAGeTbrain/).

## Data Records

The final customized atlases and surface representations of the striatum, globus pallidus, and thalamus, as well as the five MR templates can be retrieved from the Figshare repository (Data Citation 1) and is available in both MINC (http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/ServicesSoftware/MINC) and NIfTI-1 (https://nifti.nimh.nih.gov/pub/dist/src/niftilib/nifti1.h) format.

Moreover, these files are also located on our GitHub repository as these atlases and surface representations are to be used with MAGeT-Brain (http://cobralab.ca/software/MAGeTbrain/). The atlas labels and surface representations for the striatum, globus palidus and thalamus can be found at https://github.com/CobraLab/atlases/tree/master/5-atlas-subcortical, while the five high-resolution MRI templates can be found here (https://github.com/CobraLab/atlases), along with our other atlases created using the same MRI templates, namely our hippocampal subfields and white matter atlases (Winterburn et al., 2011, Pipitone et al., 2014 & Amaral et al., 2016), as well as the cerebellar atlases (Park et al., 2014).

As alluded to above, the atlas resulting from the atlas-to-template warping technique delineates 108 subcortical structures however, the final atlases in which will be used as input to the MAGeT-Brain pipeline consist of only the striatum, globus pallidus and thalamus, as these structures were validated for their accuracy, using the Dice’s kappa measures. Due to limited contrast and delineation of certain structures included in the histologically-derived atlas, such as the thalamic nuclei subdivisions, the accuracy of the segmentation for all 108 structures were not validated, as we do not have a gold-standard to compare the automated labels to (due to the lack of manual segmentation protocols for these structures). Nonetheless, the full atlas is available to download, however the accuracy of the automated segmentation for all 108 structures have not been assessed and thus these labels should be used at the discretion of the reader (Data Citation 1). Moreover, neither atlas versions (the 3 structures versus the 108 structure versions) parses the striatum into the caudate nucleus, putamen and nucleus accumbens. Partial volume effects and lack of contrast between the subdivisions of the striatum (limited contrast to delineate the border between the caudate nucleus and nucleus accumbens, as well as the fine-scale cell bridges between the caudate and the putamen) were the main factors for providing a single label for the entire striatum. Any attempt to subdivide the striatum further would be based on heuristic definition.

## Technical Validation

### Atlas-to-template warping technique validation

Given that manual segmentation is the current gold standard for anatomical delineation, the manual segmentations mentioned in section “Manual Segmentations” were used to evaluate the “goodness-of-fit” of the atlas labels generated using our atlas-to-template warping technique. All labels of the atlas had high overlap scores (κ>0.83 for all structures bilaterally). Average Dice’s Kappa scores across all five atlases show strong overlap between automated and manual segmentations for the striatum (mean left κ=0.885; right κ=0.882), the globus pallidus (mean left κ=0.836; right κ=0.829) and the thalamus (mean left κ=0.903; right κ=0.899). Average Dice’s Kappa scores across all atlases are shown in Table 2, and Dice’s Kappa scores for each atlas are shown in Table 3. See Figure 3 for an example of the final segmentations of striatum, globus pallidus and thalamus for one of the five atlases.

Based on the Dice’s Kappa scores obtained, the resulting segmentation of the striatum, globus pallidus and thalamus from the atlas-to-template warping is quite accurate. While all Dice’s Kappa scores obtained are accurate by segmentation literature standards, nonetheless, a possible explanation for Dice’s Kappa scores observed for the globus pallidus being lower than those in the striatum and thalamus is the limited resolution and contrast of certain of these structures in MRI data. Compared to the histologically-derived atlas, in which the resolution allows for the posterior portions of the subcortical structures to be well identified, there is limited resolution of these boundaries in MR images32. The limited contrast of the pallidal borders may be discrepant with manual segmentation protocols7,53, which attests to the challenges in its delineation, and will inevitably result in lower Dice’s Kappa overlap scores. Given the limited contrast for the pallidum in T1w images, the atlas-to-template warping technique was originally performed on high-resolution T2w MR templates however, the Dice’s kappa measures (striatum: left κ=0.803, right κ=0.817; globus pallidus: left κ=0.736, right κ=0.747; thalamus: left κ=0.811, right κ=0.809) were not nearly as high as those obtained when warping the histologically-derived atlas to T1w MR templates (Table 1). Thus, given the improved accuracy of the atlas labels produced on the T1w images, the final atlases described in the paper were derived on T1w MR templates. Another possible improvement of segmentation accuracy in the newly-created atlases could be the use of several sets of serial histological data from multiple atlases. However, multiple large section histology (as the one used as inputs here) are notoriously difficult to achieve. Thus, we chose to use the histological dataset detailed in Chakravarty et al., (2006), given that this data was well studied and delineated by a neurosurgeon from the Montreal Neurological Institute.

### Nonlinear Registration Algorithms

The ANIMAL algorithm42,43 was used for the nonlinear registration of the histologically-derived atlas to the five MRI templates, which deforms a source MRI volume, the pseudo-MRI atlas, to match a target MRI volume, the MRI template. Alternate nonlinear registration algorithms were also examined. Based on the results from Klein et al.54 (2009), where 15 registration algorithms were evaluated based on overlap measures of manually labeled anatomical regions, two other of nonlinear registration algorithms were used for the nonlinear registration step of the atlas-to-template warping. Given that a symmetric normalization (SyN) nonlinear transformation delivered consistently high accuracy across subjects and label sets in Klein et al. (2009), two iterations of the SyN transformation, using two different adaptations of Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTS) registration suite55, mincANTS and antsRegistration, were implemented. However, neither implementation produced superior registrations to those of ANIMAL, as evidenced by Dice’s Kappa scores (data not shown). In keeping with the methodology for atlas-to-template warping described in Chakravarty et al. (2006), ANIMAL was used to nonlinearly register the pseudo-MRIs to the MRI templates to finalize the atlas-to-template warping. The comparison of nonlinear warping techniques for atlas-to-template MRI warping is beyond the scope of this manuscript.

Moreover, two separate ANIMAL runs were performed using different parameters; the first using the parameters described in Chakravarty et al. (2006) and a second from Chakravarty et al. (2008), where the resolution of the deformation field begins at a higher resolution in the latter paper; that is, the sublattice (the number of nodes) and the sublattice diameter (the diameter of a local spherical neighbourhood around each node) is smaller for the first step of the nonlinear algorithm (sublattice=8; sublattice diameter=10 in Chakravarty et al. (2006) whereas sublattice=6; sublattice diameter=8 in Chakravarty et al. (2008)). When using the parameters described in Chakravarty et al. (2008), the atlases generated had higher Dice’s Kappa scores, compared to the Dice’s Kappa obtained when using the Chakravarty et al. (2006) parameters. Given that the resolution of the five MRI templates (0.3 mm3 isotropic) onto which the histologically-derived atlas was warped is higher than the resolution of the Colin27 template (1.0 mm3 isotropic) used in Chakravarty et al. (2006), increasing the resolution of initial step of ANIMAL increased Dice’s Kappa scores. That is, the automated labels generated using the parameters described in Chakravarty et al. (2008) for the ANIMAL nonlinear algorithm (as described in Table 1) allows for greater accuracy in capturing the neuroanatomical variation present between the histologically-derived atlas and the MRI templates, and so, these parameters were used for the creation of the five subcortical atlases.

Recent work by Xiao et al.5658 established a multi-contrast registration framework that non-rigidly deforms the histologically-derived atlas used here (ref. 23) to MRI data of multiple contrasts (such as T1w, T2*w and T2w images) to obtain segmentations of the subthalamic nucleus, substantia nigra, and red nucleus. While this technique improves accuracy of the segmentations for these nuclei, since using multiple MRI contrasts allows for enhanced visualization of these nuclei compared to the sole T1w contrast, the use of multi-contrast registration is beyond the scope of this manuscript.

How to cite this article: Tullo S. et al. Warping an atlas derived from serial histology to 5 high-resolution MRIs. Sci. Data 5:180107 doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.107 (2018).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## References

### References

1. Alheid, G., Switzer III, R. & Heimer, L. in The human nervous system Vol 1 (ed. Paxinos, G.) Ch. 19 (Academic Press, 1990).

2. Catani, M., Dell’acqua, F. & Thiebaut de Schotten, M. A revised limbic system model for memory, emotion and behaviour. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37, 1724–1737 (2013).

3. Jahanshahi, M., Obeso, I., Rothwell, J. C. & Obeso, J. A. A fronto–striato–subthalamic–pallidal network for goal-directed and habitual inhibition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 719 (2015).

4. Leh, S. E., Ptito, A., Chakravarty, M. M. & Strafella, A. P. Fronto-striatal connections in the human brain: a probabilistic diffusion tractography study. Neurosci. Lett. 419, 113–118 (2007).

5. Gogtay, N. et al. Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 8174–8179 (2004).

6. Raznahan, A. et al. Longitudinal four-dimensional mapping of subcortical anatomy in human development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 1592–1597 (2014).

7. Makowski, C. et al. Evaluating accuracy of striatal, pallidal, and thalamic segmentation methods: Comparing automated approaches to manual delineation. Neuroimage 170, 182–198 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.069 (2017).

8. Abi-Dargham, A. & Meyer, J. M. Schizophrenia: the role of dopamine and glutamate. J. Clin. Psychiatry 75, 274–275 (2014).

9. Howes, O. D. & Kapur, S. The Dopamine Hypothesis of Schizophrenia: Version III—The Final Common Pathway. Schizophr. Bull. 35, 549–562 (2009).

10. Hannestad, J. et al. White matter lesion volumes and caudate volumes in late-life depression. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 21, 1193–1198 (2006).

11. Nauczyciel, C. et al. The nucleus accumbens: a target for deep brain stimulation in resistant major depressive disorder. J Mol Psychiatry 1, 17 (2013).

12. Sadikot, A. F. et al. Creation of Computerized 3D MRI-Integrated Atlases of the Human Basal Ganglia and Thalamus. Front. Syst. Neurosci 5, 71 (2011).

13. Jack, C. R. Jr et al. The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI): MRI methods. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 27, 685–691 (2008).

14. Pausova, Z. et al. Genes, maternal smoking, and the offspring brain and body during adolescence: design of the Saguenay Youth Study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 28, 502–518 (2007).

15. Van Essen, D. C. et al. The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: an overview. Neuroimage 80, 62–79 (2013).

16. Pipitone, J. et al. Multi-atlas segmentation of the whole hippocampus and subfields using multiple automatically generated templates. Neuroimage 101, 494–512 (2014).

17. Fischl, B. et al. Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 33, 341–355 (2002).

18. Patenaude, B., Smith, S. M., Kennedy, D. N. & Jenkinson, M. A Bayesian model of shape and appearance for subcortical brain segmentation. Neuroimage 56, 907–922 (2011).

19. Chakravarty, M. M. et al. Performing label-fusion-based segmentation using multiple automatically generated templates. Hum. Brain Mapp. 34, 2635–2654 (2013).

20. Winterburn, J. L. et al. A novel in vivo atlas of human hippocampal subfields using high-resolution 3 T magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 74, 254–265 (2013).

21. Amaral, R. S. C. et al. Manual segmentation of the fornix, fimbria, and alveus on high-resolution 3 T MRI: Application via fully-automated mapping of the human memory circuit white and grey matter in healthy and pathological aging. Neuroimage. 170, 132–150 (2016).

22. Park, M. T. M. et al. Derivation of high-resolution MRI atlases of the human cerebellum at 3 T and segmentation using multiple automatically generated templates. Neuroimage 95, 217–231 (2014).

23. Chakravarty, M. M., Bertrand, G., Hodge, C. P., Sadikot, A. F. & Collins, D. L. The creation of a brain atlas for image guided neurosurgery using serial histological data. Neuroimage 30, 359–376 (2006).

24. Aljabar, P., Heckemann, R. A., Hammers, A., Hajnal, J. V. & Rueckert, D. Multi-atlas based segmentation of brain images: atlas selection and its effect on accuracy. Neuroimage 46, 726–738 (2009).

25. Collins, D. L. & Pruessner, J. C. Towards accurate, automatic segmentation of the hippocampus and amygdala from MRI by augmenting ANIMAL with a template library and label fusion. Neuroimage 52, 1355–1366 (2010).

26. Heckemann, R. A., Hajnal, J. V., Aljabar, P., Rueckert, D. & Hammers, A Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation combining label propagation and decision fusion. Neuroimage 33, 115–126 (2006).

27. Heckemann, R. A. et al. Automatic morphometry in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neuroimage 56, 2024–2037 (2011).

28. Leung, K. K. et al. Automated cross-sectional and longitudinal hippocampal volume measurement in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage 51, 1345–1359 (2010).

29. Lötjönen, J. M. et al. Fast and robust multi-atlas segmentation of brain magnetic resonance images. Neuroimage 49, 2352–2365 (2010).

30. Wolz, R. et al. LEAP: learning embeddings for atlas propagation. Neuroimage 49, 1316–1325 (2010).

31. Chakravarty, M. M. et al. Striatal shape abnormalities as novel neurodevelopmental endophenotypes in schizophrenia: a longitudinal study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 36, 1458–1469 (2015).

32. Chakravarty, M. M., Sadikot, A. F., Germann, J., Bertrand, G. & Collins, D. L. Towards a validation of atlas warping techniques. Med. Image Anal. 12, 713–726 (2008).

33. Gloor, P. The temporal lobe and limbic system (Oxford University Press: USA, 1997).

34. Hirai, T. & Jones, E. G. A new parcellation of the human thalamus on the basis of histochemical staining. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 14, 1–34 (1989).

35. Schaltenbrand, G. & Wahren, W. Atlas for stereotaxy of the human brain (Georg Thieme, 1977).

36. Chakravarty, M. M. et al. Comparison of piece-wise linear, linear, and nonlinear atlas-to-patient warping techniques: analysis of the labeling of subcortical nuclei for functional neurosurgical applications. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 3574–3595 (2009).

37. Chakravarty, M. M., Broadbent, S., Rosa-Neto, P., Lambert, C. M. & Collins, D. L. Design, construction, and validation of an MRI-compatible vibrotactile stimulator intended for clinical use. J. Neurosci. Methods 184, 129–135 (2009).

38. Chakravarty, M. M., Rosa-Neto, P., Broadbent, S., Evans, A. C. & Collins, D. L. Robust S1, S2, and thalamic activations in individual subjects with vibrotactile stimulation at 1.5 and 3.0 T. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 1328–1337 (2009).

39. Sled, J. G., Zijdenbos, A. P. & Evans, A. C. A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 17, 87–97 (1998).

40. Holmes, C. J. et al. Enhancement of MR images using registration for signal averaging. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 22, 324–333 (1998).

41. Collins, D. L., Neelin, P., Peters, T. M. & Evans, A. C. Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 18, 192–205 (1994).

42. Collins, D. L., Holmes, C. J., Peters, T. M. & Evans, A. C. Automatic 3-D model-based neuroanatomical segmentation. Hum. Brain Mapp. 3, 190–208 (1995).

43. Collins, D. L. & Evans, A. C. Animal: Validation and Applications of Nonlinear Registration-Based Segmentation. Int. J. Pattern Recognit Artif Intell 11, 1271–1294 (1997).

44. Prescott, J. W. et al. Anatomically anchored template-based level set segmentation: application to quadriceps muscles in MR images from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. J. Digit. Imaging 24, 28–43 (2011).

45. Zou, K. H. et al. Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index. Acad. Radiol. 11, 178–189 (2004).

46. Xiao, Y. et al. Investigation of morphometric variability of subthalamic nucleus, red nucleus, and substantia nigra in advanced Parkinson’s disease patients using automatic segmentation and PCA-based analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 35, 4330–4344 (2014).

47. Borghammer, P. et al. A deformation-based morphometry study of patients with early-stage Parkinson’s disease. Eur. J. Neurol. 17, 314–320 (2010).

48. Dorr, A. E., Lerch, J. P., Spring, S., Kabani, N. & Henkelman, R. M. High resolution three-dimensional brain atlas using an average magnetic resonance image of 40 adult C57Bl/6 J mice. Neuroimage 42, 60–69 (2008).

49. Frey, S. et al. An MRI based average macaque monkey stereotaxic atlas and space (MNI monkey space). Neuroimage 55, 1435–1442 (2011).

50. Voineskos, A. N. et al. Hippocampal (subfield) volume and shape in relation to cognitive performance across the adult lifespan. Hum. Brain Mapp. 36, 3020–3037 (2015).

51. Cignoni, P. et al. Meshlab: an open-source mesh processing tool in Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference (2008); 129–136 academia.edu, (2008).

52. Valette, S., Chassery, J. M. & Prost, R. ACVD: Surface mesh coarsening and resampling (2004).

53. Babalola, K. O. et al. An evaluation of four automatic methods of segmenting the subcortical structures in the brain. Neuroimage 47, 1435–1447 (2009).

54. Klein, A. et al. Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration. Neuroimage 46, 786–802 (2009).

55. Avants, B. B., Tustison, N. & Song, G. Advanced normalization tools (ANTS). Insight J 2, 1–35 (2009).

56. Xiao, Y. et al. Atlas-Based Segmentation of the Subthalamic Nucleus, Red Nucleus, and Substantia Nigra for Deep Brain Stimulation by Incorporating Multiple MRI Contrasts. in Information Processing in Computer-Assisted Interventions 135–145 Springer Berlin Heidelberg, (2012).

57. Xiao, Y. et al. Multi-contrast unbiased MRI atlas of a Parkinson’s disease population. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg 10, 329–341 (2015).

58. Xiao, Y. et al. A dataset of multi-contrast population-averaged brain MRI atlases of a Parkinson’s disease cohort. Data in brief 12 370–379 (2017).

### Data Citations

1. Tullo, S. et al. Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4052768 (2018)

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

S.T. created the five atlases and the surface representations of the striatum, globus pallidus and thalamus, and performed the validation of the atlases. S.T. wrote the manuscript with edits from G.A.D, R.P, M.M.T.P and M.M.C. G.A.D. performed the re-meshing and quadratic space smoothing of the surface representations of the striatum, globus pallidus and thalamus, and helped with the implementation of alternate nonlinear algorithms. R.P. provided help with the creation of the model atlas labels, as well as the three-dimensional rendering of subcortical structures for the creation of the surface representations of the striatum, globus pallidus and thalamus, and their implementation in the MAGeT-Brain pipeline. M.M.T.P. provided the segmentations of the striatum, globus pallidus and thalamus used to validate the automated atlas labels for the five MR templates. D.L.C provided the framework for the original work in which this project was based upon. M.M.C provided the conception and design of the work, the original atlas and the five T1-weighted MR images, and provided the parameters for the ANIMAL nonlinear algorithm. M.M.C is principal supervisor for the MSc degree of S.T.

### Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Stephanie Tullo or M. Mallar Chakravarty.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Tullo, S., Devenyi, G., Patel, R. et al. Warping an atlas derived from serial histology to 5 high-resolution MRIs. Sci Data 5, 180107 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.107

• Accepted:

• Published:

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.107

• ### Involvement of the habenula in the pathophysiology of autism spectrum disorder

• Jürgen Germann
• Flavia Venetucci Gouveia
• Gabriel A. Devenyi

Scientific Reports (2021)

• ### Neuroimaging Technological Advancements for Targeting in Functional Neurosurgery

• Alexandre Boutet
• Robert Gramer
• Alfonso Fasano

Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports (2019)

• ### Imaging the pituitary in psychopathologies: a review of in vivo magnetic resonance imaging studies

• Sherri Lee Jones
• Jens C. Pruessner

Brain Structure and Function (2019)

• ### A preclinical micro-computed tomography database including 3D whole body organ segmentations

• Stefanie Rosenhain
• Zuzanna A. Magnuska
• Felix Gremse

Scientific Data (2018)