Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Effect of surgery on motor recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury

Spinal Cord volume 34, pages 188–192 (1996)Cite this article

Abstract

The influence of spine surgery on motor recovery between 1 month and 1 year was assessed prospectively in a group of 269 patients following traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) using the classification system originally developed by the American Spinal Injury Association. The Allen classification was used to categorize cervical vertebral pathology and the Denis system was used for injuries to the thoracic and lumbar spine. Gunshot injuries were classified based upon the bullet trajectory and location relative to the spinal canal. Individuals undergoing surgery were divided into various subgroups depending on the type of surgery performed: anterior decompression with or without spine fusion and instrumentation, posterior decompression/laminectomy with or without spine fusion and instrumentation and spine fusion with instrumentation. Motor score recovery between 1 month and 1 year after injury was highly dependent (P≤0.001) on the level and completeness of injury averaging 0.7 ± 2.7 for complete paraplegics, 7.8 + 4.8 for complete tetraplegics, 11.8 + 8.3, for incomplete paraplegics and 22.2+10.9 for incomplete tetraplegics. Motor recovery did not significantly differ between patients categorized in various surgical subgroups or between those having surgery and those treated non-operatively. Additionally, although the sample size was small, motor recovery among ttraplgie individuals did not depend on whether unilateral and bilateral facet dislocations were reduced and in patients with incomplete lesions, those with reductions actually had a poorer outcome than those who were left in a dislocated position.

Download PDF

References

  1. Cotler J M, Vernace J V, Michalski J A . The use of Harrington rods in thoracolumbar fractures. Orthopedic Clinics of North America 1986; 17: 87–103.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cotler H B . The treatment of cervical spine trauma: a century of progress. Orthopaedics 1992; 5: 279–283.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bradford D S, McBride G G . Surgical management of thoracolumbar spine fractures with incomplete neurological deficits. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 1987: 218: 201.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bohlman H H, Freehafer A, Dejak J . The results of treatment of acute injuries of the upper thoracic spine with paralysis. JBJS 1985: 67A: 360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Crutcher J P et al. Indirect spinal canal decompression in patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures treated by posterior distraction rods. J Spinal Dis 1991; 4: 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mumford J et al. Thoracolumbar burst fractures: The clinical efficacy and outcome of nonoperative management. Spine 1993; 18: 955–970.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Waters R L et al. Recovery following complete paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: 784–789.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Waters R L et al. Motor and sensory recovery following complete tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 242–247.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Waters R L et al. Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 67–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Waters R L et al. Neurologic recovery following incomplete tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 306–311.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bracken M B et al. A randomized, controlled trial of methyl-prednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal-cord injury. Results of the Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. New Eng J Med 1990; 322: 1405–1411.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Allen B L et al. A mechanistic classification of closed indirect fractures and dislocations of the lower cervical spine. Spine 1982; 7: 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Denis F . The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spine injuries. Spine 1983; 8: 817–831.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Waters R L et al. Profiles of spinal cord injury and neurologic recovery following gunshot. Clin Orthop 1991; 267: 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stover S L, De Lisa J A, Whiteneck G G . Spinal Cord Injury Clinical Outcomes from the Model Systems. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers, Inc., 1995.

  16. Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Injury Patients. American Spinal Injury Association 1985; Chicago, Illinois.

  17. Ditunno J F . The international standards booklet for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 1994; 32: 70–80.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Capaul M et al. Analyses of 94 consecutive spinal cord injury patients using ASIA definition and modified Frankel score classification. Paraplegia 1994; 32: 583–587.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brown P J et al. The 72 h examination as a predictor of recovery in motor complete quadriplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991; 72: 546–548.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Waters R L et al. Effect of Injury Pattern on Motor Recovery following Traumatic SCI. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 440–443.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Waters R L, Adkins R H . The effects of removal of bullet fragments retained in the spinal canal. A collaborative study by the National Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems. Spine 1991; 16: 934–939.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Delamarter R B, Sherman J E, Carr J B . 1991 Volvo Award in Experimental Studies, Cauda Equina Syndrome: Neurologic recovery following immediate, early, or late decompression. Spine 1991; 16: 1022–1029.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Regional Spinal Cord Injury Care System of Southern California, Rancho Los Amigos Medical Center, California, USA

    R L Waters, R H Adkins, J S Yakura & I Sie

Authors
  1. R L Waters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R H Adkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J S Yakura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. I Sie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waters, R., Adkins, R., Yakura, J. et al. Effect of surgery on motor recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 34, 188–192 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1996.37

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1996.37

Keywords

  • spinal cord injury
  • motor recovery
  • surgical treatment

Further reading

Search

Advanced search

Quick links