Abstract
Over the past two decades, the number of surviving apneic spinal cord injured patients has been increasing. Mechanical ventilation for home maintenance has been supplemented by electrophrenic respiration (EPR) since 1970. Nineteen patients who were totally mechanical ventilator dependent at discharge from rehabilitation in a spinal cord centre are compared with 18 patients discharged on EPR. There were more young males in the EPR group while the overall average ages were approximately the same. The mortality rates were approximately equal although the mechanical ventilator dependent patients expired earlier than the EPR group. Survivors on mechanical ventilation lived longer on an average and the vast majority of both groups were discharged to their home. There needs to be the establishment of a ventilatory dependent registry for spinal cord injury.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Glenn W W L, Holcomb W G, Hogan J, et al. 1973 Diaphragm pacing by radiofrequency transmission in the treatment of chronic ventilatory insuffiency. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 66(4): 505–520.
Glenn W W L, Phelps M L 1985 Diaphragm pacing by electrical stimulation of the phrenic nerve. Neurosurgery 17(6): 974–984.
Whiteneck G G, Carter R E, Charlifue S W, et al 1985 A Collaborative Study of High Quadriplegia. Grant Report, U.S. Department of Education, Rehabilitation Research and Demonstrations-Field Initiated Research. Contact: Gayle Whiteneck, Ph.D. (Craig Hospital, Englewood, Colorado).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carter, R., Donovan, W., Halstead, L. et al. Comparative study of electrophrenic nerve stimulation and mechanical ventilatory support in traumatic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 25, 86–91 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1987.16
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1987.16