Abstract
Physical geography has long been identified as critical for urban development, land use and environmental outcomes in cities worldwide. However, the literature has yet to provide comprehensive, quantitative analyses of the global extent and impact of urban geographic barriers. Here we introduce three novel indexes: the share of natural barriers, nonconvexity (a measure of natural fragmentation) and the average road detour, to measure and study the practical reach and effects of natural constraints around global cities. We calculate these indexes for areas in and around four separate global city-boundary definitions, augmenting the original data with additional variables. We find that natural barriers lead to more complex transportation environments and are associated with higher urban densities, smaller urbanized footprints, taller buildings and less pollution but also with lower incomes and smaller populations. To draw meaningful policy conclusions, comparative research about environmental, economic and social outcomes across global cities should always account for their surrounding geographies.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The original datasets analyzed in this study are publicly available, as referenced in the article. The indicators derived from the datasets and the three urban indexes measuring geographic barriers can be found via GitHub at https://github.com/WilliamLiPro/Fragmented_by_Nature.
Code availability
The Python code for calculating the three geographic barriers and the Stata code for regressions we use in this study can be found via GitHub at https://github.com/WilliamLiPro/Fragmented_by_Nature.
References
Batty, M. The size, scale and shape of cities. Science 319, 769–771 (2008).
Cox, K. R. Spaces of globalisation: reasserting the power of the local. Cap. Class 24, 150–151 (2000).
Glaeser, E. L. & Gottlieb, J. D. The wealth of cities: agglomeration economies and spatial equilibrium in the United States. J. Econ. Lit. 47, 983–1028 (2009).
Nagendra, H., Bai, X., Brondizio, E. S. & Lwasa, S. The urban south and the predicament of global sustainability. Nat. Sustain. 1, 341–349 (2018).
Bettencourt, L. M., Lobo, J., Helbing, D., Kühnert, C. & West, G. B. Growth, innovation, scaling and the pace of life in cities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 7301–7306 (2007).
Barredo, J. I., Caudullo, G. & Dosio, A. Mediterranean habitat loss under future climate conditions: assessing impacts on the Natura 2000 protected area network. Appl. Geogr. 75, 83–92 (2016).
Seto, K. C., Fragkias, M., Güneralp, B. & Reilly, M. K. A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. PLoS ONE 6, e23777 (2011).
Güneralp, B., Güneralp, İ. & Liu, Y. Changing global patterns of urban exposure to flood and drought hazards. Glob. Environ. Change 31, 217–225 (2015).
Acuto, M., Parnell, S. & Seto, K. C. Building a global urban science. Nat. Sustain. 1, 2–4 (2018).
Schneider, A. & Woodcock, C. E. Compact, dispersed, fragmented, extensive? A comparison of urban growth in twenty-five global cities using remotely sensed data, pattern metrics and census information. Urban Stud. 45, 659–692 (2008).
Liu, L. & Meng, L. Patterns of urban sprawl from a global perspective. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 146, 04020004 (2020).
Glaeser, E. L. & Kahn, M. E. in Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics (ed. Jacques-François, T.) Vol. 4, 2481–2527 (Elsevier, 2004).
Cervero, R. Linking urban transport and land use in developing countries. J. Transp. Land Use 6, 7–24 (2013).
McIntosh, J., Trubka, R., Kenworthy, J. & Newman, P. The role of urban form and transit in city car dependence: analysis of 26 global cities from 1960 to 2000. Transp. Res. D 33, 95–110 (2014).
Jedwab, R., Barr, J. & Brueckner, J. K. Cities without skylines: worldwide building-height gaps and their possible determinants and implications. J. Urban Econ. 132, 103507 (2022).
Wells, M. Skyscrapers: Structure and Design (Laurence King Publishing, 2005).
Moehle, J. P. Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Vol. 814 (McGraw-Hill Education, 2015).
Rosenthal, S. S. & Strange, W. C. The attenuation of human capital spillovers. J. Urban Econ. 64, 373–389 (2008).
Barr, J., Tassier, T. & Trendafilov, R. Depth to bedrock and the formation of the manhattan skyline, 1890–1915. J. Econ. Hist. 71, 1060–1077 (2011).
Burchfield, M., Overman, H. G., Puga, D. & Turner, M. A. Causes of sprawl: a portrait from space. Q. J. Econ. 121, 587–633 (2006).
Saiz, A. The geographic determinants of housing supply. Q. J. Econ. 125, 1253–1296 (2010).
Harari, M. Cities in bad shape: urban geometry in india. Am. Econ. Rev. 110, 2377–2421 (2020).
Duque, J. C., Lozano-Gracia, N., Patino, J. E. & Restrepo, P. Urban form and productivity: what shapes are Latin-American cities? Environ. Plan. B 49, 131–150 (2022).
Angel, S., Parent, J. & Civco, D. L. Ten compactness properties of circles: measuring shape in geography. Can. Geogr. 54, 441–461 (2010).
Sevtuk, A. & Amindarbari, R. Does metropolitan form affect transportation sustainability? Evidence from US metropolitan areas. Environ. Plan. B 48, 2385–2401 (2021).
Saiz, A. & Wang, L. Physical geography and traffic delays: evidence from a major coastal city. Environ. Plan. B 50, 218–243 (2023).
Akbar, P., Couture, V., Duranton, G. & Storeygard, A. Mobility and congestion in urban India. Am. Econ. Rev. 113, 1083–1111 (2023).
Akbar, P. A., Couture, V., Duranton, G. & Storeygard, A. The fast, the slow and the congested: urban transportation in rich and poor countries. Working Paper No. w31642 (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2023).
Cutter, S. L. The landscape of disaster resilience indicators in the USA. Nat. Hazards 80, 741–758 (2016).
Hinkel, J. & Klein, R. J. Integrating knowledge to assess coastal vulnerability to sea-level rise: the development of the diva tool. Glob. Environ. Change 19, 384–395 (2009).
Bertaud, A. Clearing the air in Atlanta: transit and smart growth or conventional economics? J. Urban Econ. 54, 379–400 (2003).
Suzuki, H., Cervero, R. & Iuchi, K. Transforming Cities with Transit: Transit and Land-Use Integration for Sustainable Urban Development (World Bank Publications, 2013).
Florczyk, A. et al. Description of the GHS Urban Centre Database 2015 https://doi.org/10.2760/037310 (Publications Office of the European Union, 2019).
Dijkstra, L. et al. Applying the degree of urbanisation to the globe: a new harmonised definition reveals a different picture of global urbanisation. J. Urban Econ. 125, 103312 (2021).
Xu, Z. et al. Mapping hierarchical urban boundaries for global urban settlements. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 103, 102480 (2021).
Li, X. et al. Mapping global urban boundaries from the Global Artificial Impervious Area (GAIA) data. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 094044 (2020).
Angel, S., Blei, A. M., Civco, D. L. & Parent, J. Atlas of Urban Expansion (Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2016).
Pesaresi, M. & Politis, P. GHS-BUILT-S R2023A—GHS built-up surface grid, derived from sentinel2 composite and landsat, multitemporal (1975–2030). European Commission http://data.europa.eu/89h/9f06f36f-4b11-47ec-abb0-4f8b7b1d72ea (2023).
Irwin, E. G. & Bockstael, N. E. The evolution of urban sprawl: evidence of spatial heterogeneity and increasing land fragmentation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 20672–20677 (2007).
Reis, J. P., Silva, E. A. & Pinho, P. Spatial metrics to study urban patterns in growing and shrinking cities. Urban Geogr. 37, 246–271 (2016).
Lutz, C. & Sand, B. Highly disaggregated land unavailability https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3478900 (SSRN, 2023).
Müller, I., Taubenböck, H., Kuffer, M. & Wurm, M. Misperceptions of predominant slum locations? Spatial analysis of slum locations in terms of topography based on Earth observation data. Remote Sens. 12, 2474 (2020).
Brueckner, J. K. The structure of urban equilibria: a unified treatment of the Muth–Mills model. in Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol. 2, 821–845 (North Holland, 1987).
van Ham, M., Uesugi, M., Tammaru, T., Manley, D. & Janssen, H. Changing occupational structures and residential segregation in New York, London and Tokyo. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 1124–1134 (2020).
Casey, E. S. & Watkins, M. Up Against the Wall: Re-imagining the US–Mexico Border (University of Texas Press, 2014).
World Bank Country and Lending Groups (The World Bank, 2017).
Freedom in the world 2022. Freedom House https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world (2022).
Saiz, A. Dictatorships and highways. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 36, 187–206 (2006).
York, A. M. et al. Land fragmentation under rapid urbanization: a cross-site analysis of southwestern cities. Urban Ecosyst. 14, 429–455 (2011).
Mahtab-uz-Zaman, Q. M., Lau, S. S. Y. & Mei, S. H. The compact city of Hong Kong: a sustainable model for Asia? in Compact Cities: Sustainable Urban Forms for Developing Countries (eds Burgess, R. & Jenks, M.) 267–280 (Taylor & Francis, 2000).
Duranton, G. & Puga, D. in Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics (eds Henderson, V. & Thisse, J. F.) Vol. 4, 2063–2117 (Elsevier, 2004).
Rosenthal, S. S. & Strange, W. C. in Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics (eds Henderson, V. & Thisse, J. F.) Vol. 4, 2119–2171 (Elsevier, 2004).
Jedwab, R., Loungani, P. & Yezer, A. Comparing cities in developed and developing countries: population, land area, building height and crowding. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 86, 103609 (2021).
Ahlfeldt, G. M. & McMillen, D. P. Tall buildings and land values: height and construction cost elasticities in Chicago, 1870–2010. Rev. Econ. Stat. 100, 861–875 (2018).
Gibson, J., Olivia, S. & Boe-Gibson, G. Night lights in economics: sources and uses 1. J. Econ. Surv. 34, 955–980 (2020).
Güneralp, B. et al. Global scenarios of urban density and its impacts on building energy use through 2050. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 8945–8950 (2017).
Kaza, N. Urban form and transportation energy consumption. Energy Policy 136, 111049 (2020).
Glaeser, E. L. & Kahn, M. E. The greenness of cities: carbon dioxide emissions and urban development. J. Urban Econ. 67, 404–418 (2010).
Lee, S. & Lee, B. The influence of urban form on GHG emissions in the US household sector. Energy Policy 68, 534–549 (2014).
Crippa, M. et al. Gridded emissions of air pollutants for the period 1970–2012 within Edgar v4. 3.2. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 10, 1987–2013 (2018).
Schmitz, R. Modelling of air pollution dispersion in Santiago de Chile. Atmos. Environ. 39, 2035–2047 (2005).
Güneralp, B., Reba, M., Hales, B. U., Wentz, E. A. & Seto, K. C. Trends in urban land expansion, density and land transitions from 1970 to 2010: a global synthesis. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 044015 (2020).
Creutzig, F., Baiocchi, G., Bierkandt, R., Pichler, P.-P. & Seto, K. C. Global typology of urban energy use and potentials for an urbanization mitigation wedge. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6283–6288 (2015).
Yamazaki, D., Trigg, M. A. & Ikeshima, D. Development of a global 90 m water body map using multi-temporal landsat images. Remote Sens. Environ. 171, 337–351 (2015).
Jarvis, A., Reuter, H. I., Nelson, A. & Guevara, E. Hole-filled SRTM for the globe: version 4. CGIAR-CSI https://srtm.csi.cgiar.org/ (2008).
Hijmans, R., Garcia, N. & Wieczorek, J. GADM: database of global administrative areas, version 3.6. GADM https://gadm.org/ (2018).
World Development Indicators 2016 (The World Bank, 2016).
Hamilton, B. W. Wasteful commuting again. J. Polit. Econ. 97, 1497–1504 (1989).
Wheaton, W. C. Commuting, congestion and employment dispersal in cities with mixed land use. J. Urban Econ. 55, 417–438 (2004).
Boeing, G. Osmnx: new methods for acquiring, constructing, analyzing and visualizing complex street networks. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 65, 126–139 (2017).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the research assistance from D. Niu and X. Wang and for their helpful comments during the experiment and earlier draft of this paper. The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.W. and A.S. designed the project, performed the analysis and wrote and edited the paper. W.L. designed the algorithm and reviewed the paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Cities thanks Shlomo Angel, Mehebub Sahana and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Sections 1–5, Figs. 1–22 and Tables 1–14.
Supplementary Data 1
All the indicators and Stata code.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, L., Saiz, A. & Li, W. Natural fragmentation increases urban density but impedes transportation and city growth worldwide. Nat Cities 1, 642–653 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-024-00118-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-024-00118-5