Strategies for hands-on and hands-off teaching, coupled with dynamic adaptation to students and science, enable effective pedagogy in bioengineering.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Rios, B. et al. Mechanically programming anisotropy in engineered muscle with actuating extracellular matrices. Device 1, 100097 (2023).
Tomko, M. et al. A makerspace is more than just a room full of tools: what learning looks like for female students in makerspaces. In Proceedings of the ASME 2018 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 7: 30th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2018-86276 (ASME, 2018).
Brubaker, E. R., Karanian, B. A., Sheppard, S. & Sheppard, S. D. Integrating mind, hand, and heart: how students are transformed by hands-on designing and making. In American Society for Engineering Education https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--32988 (ASEE, 2019).
Roldan, W., Hui, J. & Gerber, E. M. University makerspaces: opportunities to support equitable participation for women in engineering. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 34, 751–768 (2018).
Newstetter, W. C., Behravesh, E., Nersessian, N. J. & Fasse, B. B. Design principles for problem-driven learning laboratories in biomedical engineering education. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 38, 3257–3267 (2010).
Raman, R., Mitchell, M., Perez-Pinera, P., Bashir, R. & DeStefano, L. Design and integration of a problem-based biofabrication course into an undergraduate biomedical engineering curriculum. J. Biol. Eng. 10, 10 (2016).
Raman, R., Cvetkovic, C. & Bashir, R. A modular approach to the design, fabrication, and characterization of muscle-powered biological machines. Nat. Protoc. 12, 519–533 (2017).
Acknowledgements
The author acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation CAREER Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Related links
3D bioprinting-focused makerspace: https://shed.mit.edu/
BioMaker Space: https://biomakers.mit.edu/about-us/hhbms/
Open-source online resource (Molecular, Cellular, and Tissue Biomechanics Quizlet): https://www.mos.org/quizlet/molecular-cellular-and-tissue-biomechanics-quizlet
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Raman, R. Pedagogy in bioengineering: pipettes, practice and patience. Nat Rev Bioeng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44222-024-00248-4
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44222-024-00248-4