Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Pedagogy in bioengineering: pipettes, practice and patience

Strategies for hands-on and hands-off teaching, coupled with dynamic adaptation to students and science, enable effective pedagogy in bioengineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Ritu Raman (right), Eugene Bell Career Development Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at MIT, guiding a student in the laboratory.

References

  1. Rios, B. et al. Mechanically programming anisotropy in engineered muscle with actuating extracellular matrices. Device 1, 100097 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tomko, M. et al. A makerspace is more than just a room full of tools: what learning looks like for female students in makerspaces. In Proceedings of the ASME 2018 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 7: 30th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2018-86276 (ASME, 2018).

  3. Brubaker, E. R., Karanian, B. A., Sheppard, S. & Sheppard, S. D. Integrating mind, hand, and heart: how students are transformed by hands-on designing and making. In American Society for Engineering Education https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--32988 (ASEE, 2019).

  4. Roldan, W., Hui, J. & Gerber, E. M. University makerspaces: opportunities to support equitable participation for women in engineering. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 34, 751–768 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Newstetter, W. C., Behravesh, E., Nersessian, N. J. & Fasse, B. B. Design principles for problem-driven learning laboratories in biomedical engineering education. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 38, 3257–3267 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Raman, R., Mitchell, M., Perez-Pinera, P., Bashir, R. & DeStefano, L. Design and integration of a problem-based biofabrication course into an undergraduate biomedical engineering curriculum. J. Biol. Eng. 10, 10 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Raman, R., Cvetkovic, C. & Bashir, R. A modular approach to the design, fabrication, and characterization of muscle-powered biological machines. Nat. Protoc. 12, 519–533 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation CAREER Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ritu Raman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Related links

3D bioprinting-focused makerspace: https://shed.mit.edu/

BioMaker Space: https://biomakers.mit.edu/about-us/hhbms/

Open-source online resource (Molecular, Cellular, and Tissue Biomechanics Quizlet): https://www.mos.org/quizlet/molecular-cellular-and-tissue-biomechanics-quizlet

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raman, R. Pedagogy in bioengineering: pipettes, practice and patience. Nat Rev Bioeng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44222-024-00248-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44222-024-00248-4

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing