Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

How Europe’s most iconic wetland could be finished off by a strawberry farming bill

Nature Water volume 1, pages 564–565 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Doñana is one of the largest wetlands in Europe, and one of its most iconic protected areas. A World Heritage and Ramsar site, it hosts up to half a million migratory waterbirds annually, around 50 resident waterbird species, a rich biodiversity, and highly endangered species such as the Iberian imperial eagle and the Iberian lynx. But it has been degrading for decades — and a recent farming bill legalising informal land occupation for intensive irrigated strawberry production in its immediate neighbourhood is risking to devastate it completely.

The conflictive process that led to Doñana’s legal protection in the 60s left a lasting legacy on its fate as a conservation area. Only one-third of the original marshland and a fraction of its forests, streams and ponds were covered by the protected status. The rest were turned into polders, rice fields, irrigated agriculture, and exotic tree plantations1. These changes resulted in a polarised landscape of extremes: anthropogenic versus pristine2. Despite its growing international reputation as a conservation area, its surroundings have been subjected to rapid land- and water-use intensification for agriculture and tourism1, leading to profound shortage and pollution of surface water, groundwater overexploitation, overgrazing, and recurrent forest fires. Shifting baselines generated perceptual biases hampering the identification of the ensuing ecological degradation. Multi-million investments in ‘sustainable development’ programs largely failed because they also promoted the continued expansion of infrastructures for tourism and intensive, greenhouse-based agriculture that now threaten Doñana3.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Méndez, P. F., Isendahl, N., Amezaga, J. M. & Santamaría, L. Ecol. Soc. 17, 26 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zorrilla-Miras, P. et al. Landsc. Urban Plan. 122, 160–174 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Onate, J. J., Pereira, D. & Suárez, F. Environ. Manag. 31, 0642–0655 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. ESPN. Programa de Seguimiento de Procesos y Recursos Naturales en el Espacio Natural de Doñana: Memoria 2021. ICTS-Reserva Biológica de Doñana (CSIC, 2021); https://doi.org/10.20350/digitalCSIC/14691

  5. de Felipe, M., Aragonés, D. & Díaz-Paniagua, C. Sci. Total Environ. 880, 163329 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rendón, M. A., Green, A. J., Aguilera, E. & Almaraz, P. Biol. Conserv. 141, 1371–1388 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Corona, M. G., Vicente, A. M. & Novo, F. G. Vegetatio 75, 73–80 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Moreno, S. et al. Wildlife Res. 34, 652–658 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Amezaga, J. M. & Santamaría, L. Phys. Chem. Earth B 25, 635–640 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mamonova, N. & Franquesa, J. Sociol. Ruralis 60, 710–731 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Doñana is one of the ‘Knowledge Sites’ of the EU-funded project WaterLANDS: Water-based solutions for carbon storage, people and wilderness (Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme; Grant Agreement No. 101036484 (WaterLANDS). This correspondence reflects only the authors’ views and the European Commission cannot be held responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Conservation Biology and Global Change, Doñana Biological Station (EBD-CSIC), Sevilla, Spain

    Luis Santamaría

  2. Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

    Julia Martin-Ortega

Authors
  1. Luis Santamaría
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Julia Martin-Ortega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Santamaría.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santamaría, L., Martin-Ortega, J. How Europe’s most iconic wetland could be finished off by a strawberry farming bill. Nat Water 1, 564–565 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-023-00100-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-023-00100-w

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene