Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

FAIR and Open Data requires proper incentives and a shift in academic culture

While the benefits of FAIR principles — findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable — and Open Data seem clear to most scientists, significant hurdles need to be overcome to make scientific databases useful and sustainable. The difficulties with incentivizing the community to share data, as encountered by the recently launched Open Membrane Database (OMD), can be used as a starting point to fuel the debate on the power and pitfalls of FAIR and Open Data practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Incentives of researchers to contribute to FAIR/O data management.

References

  1. Bornmann, L., Haunschild, R. & Mutz, R. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 8, 224 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wilkinson, M. D. et al. Sci. Data 3, 1–9 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Himanen, L., Geurts, A., Foster, A. S. & Rinke, P. Adv. Sci. 6, 1900808 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bereyhi, M. J. & Kippenberg, T. J. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 843–850 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ritt, C. L. et al. J. Memb. Sci. 641, (2022).

  6. Gurevitch, J., Koricheva, J., Nakagawa, S. & Stewart, G. Nature 555, 175–182 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Edwards, M. A. & Roy, S. Environ. Eng. Sci. 34, 51–61 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. van Dalen, H. P. Scientometrics 126, 1675–1694 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nicholls, H., Nicholls, M., Tekin, S., Lamb, D. & Billings, J. PLoS One 17, 1–29 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lutz, J. F. Nat. Chem. 4, 588–589 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. The Slow Science Academy. The Slow Science Manifesto http://slow-science.org/ (2010).

  12. Stengers, I. Another Science is Possible: A Manifesto for Slow Science (Polity Press, 2018).

  13. Kirchherr, J. Circ. Econ. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-022-00175-9 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mehmani, B., van Rossum, J. & van Dijk, U. Reviewer Recognition Platform (Elsevier, 2015).

  15. Therese, A. Recognize Review with ORCID https://info.orcid.org/recognizereview-with-orcid/ (2016).

  16. Nature Sustainability. Get recognition for your effort https://www.nature.com/natsustain/for-reviewers/reviewer-recognition (2018).

  17. Sorbonne declaration on research data rights (AAU, ARUA, CFRIU, German U15, LERU, RU11, Russell Group, The Group of Eight, U15, 2020);

  18. Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment (CoARA, 2022); https://coara.eu/agreement/the-agreement-full-text/

  19. UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science (UNESCO, 2021); https://en.unesco.org/science-sustainable-future/open-science/recommendation

  20. Practical guide to the international alignment of research data management (Science Europe, 2021); https://www.scienceeurope.org/our-resources/practical-guide-to-the-international-alignment-of-research-data-management/

  21. Sansone, S. A. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 358–367 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Data in Brief. Science Direct https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/data-in-brief (2022).

  23. The World of Figshare https://knowledge.figshare.com/ (2022).

  24. Quay, A. N., Fiske, P. S. & Mauter, M. S. ACS ES&T Eng. 2, 337–346 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rhea Verbeke.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Verbeke, R. FAIR and Open Data requires proper incentives and a shift in academic culture. Nat Water 1, 7–9 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-022-00012-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-022-00012-1

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing