Abstract
Modern technology relies on an undisrupted supply of metals, yet many metals have limited geological deposits. Recovering metals from wastewater and brine could augment metal stocks, but there is little guidance on which metals to prioritize for recovery or on the techno-economic viability of extraction processes. Here we critically assess the potential for recovering metals from wastewater and brine. We first look at which metals are critical for recovery on the basis of their supply risks and the impacts of those supply restrictions. We then assess the feasibility of recovering these metals from various water sources by estimating the required operational costs to match market prices. Next we discuss the limitations of established separation technologies that may inhibit the practicality and scalability of metal recovery from water. We conclude by highlighting materials and processes that could serve as more sustainable alternatives to metal recovery with further research and development.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$99.00 per year
only $8.25 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Graedel, T. E., Harper, E. M., Nassar, N. T., Nuss, P. & Reck, B. K. Criticality of metals and metalloids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 4257–4262 (2015).
Reck, B. K. & Graedel, T. E. Challenges in metal recycling. Science 337, 690–695 (2012).
Miller, K. D. et al. Mine water use, treatment, and reuse in the United States: a look at current industry practices and select case. ACS EST Eng. 2, 391–408 (2022).
Northey, S., Mohr, S., Mudd, G. M., Weng, Z. & Giurco, D. Modelling future copper ore grade decline based on a detailed assessment of copper resources and mining. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 83, 190–201 (2014).
Rankin, W. J. Minerals, Metals and Sustainability: Meeting Future Material Needs (CSIRO, 2011).
Elshkaki, A., Graedel, T. E., Ciacci, L. & Reck, B. K. Resource demand scenarios for the major metals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 2491–24979 (2018).
Nassar, N. T., Graedel, T. E. & Harper, E. M. By-product metals are technologically essential but have problematic supply. Sci. Adv. 1, e1400180 (2015). This study demonstrates that many companion metals are essential to modern technology but are particularly susceptible to supply constraints in the coming decades.
Lin, S., Hatzell, M., Liu, R., Wells, G. & Xie, X. Mining resources from water. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 175, 105853 (2021).
Loganathan, P., Naidu, G. & Vigneswaran, S. Mining valuable minerals from seawater: a critical review. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 3, 37–53 (2017).
Shahmansouri, A., Min, J., Jin, L. & Bellona, C. Feasibility of extracting valuable minerals from desalination concentrate: a comprehensive literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 100, 4–16 (2015).
Epsztein, R., DuChanois, R. M., Ritt, C. L., Noy, A. & Elimelech, M. Towards single-species selectivity of membranes with subnanometre pores. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 426–436 (2020). This paper outlines how to design ion-selective membranes on the basis of principles from the K+ channel.
DuChanois, R. M., Porter, C. J., Violet, C., Verduzco, R. & Elimelech, M. Membrane materials for selective ion separations at the water–energy nexus. Adv. Mater. 33, 2101312 (2021). This paper describes membrane materials that may lead to high-precision ion separations.
Yang, S., Zhang, F., Ding, H., He, P. & Zhou, H. Lithium metal extraction from seawater. Joule 2, 1648–1651 (2018).
Liu, C. et al. A half-wave rectified alternating current electrochemical method for uranium extraction from seawater. Nat. Energy 2, 17007 (2017).
Uliana, A. A. et al. Ion-capture electrodialysis using multifunctional adsorptive membranes. Science 372, 296–299 (2021).
Zou, S. & Mauter, M. S. Competing ion behavior in direct electrochemical selenite reduction. ACS EST Eng. 1, 1028–1035 (2021).
Blengini, G. A. et al. Study on the EU’s List of Critical Raw Materials: Final Report (European Commission, 2020); https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/c0d5292a-ee54-11ea-991b-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
Nakano, J. The Geopolitics of Critical Minerals Supply Chains (CSIS, 2021); https://www.csis.org/analysis/geopolitics-critical-minerals-supply-chains
Canada’s Critical Minerals List 2021 (Government of Canada, 2021); https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/our-natural-resources/minerals-mining/critical-minerals/23414
Final List of Critical Minerals 2018 (Federal Register, US Department of the Interior, 2018); https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/05/18/2018-10667/final-list-of-critical-minerals-2018
Australian Critical Minerals Prospectus 2021 (Australian Government, 2021); https://www.austrade.gov.au/news/publications/australian-critical-minerals-prospectus-2021
Graedel, T. E., Reck, B. K. & Miatto, A. Alloy information helps prioritize material criticality lists. Nat. Commun. 13, 150 (2022).
Graedel, T. E. et al. Recycling Rates of Metals—A Status Report (UNEP, 2011); https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/8702
Nuss, P. & Eckelman, M. J. Life cycle assessment of metals: a scientific synthesis. PLoS ONE 9, e101298 (2014). The global warming potential of mining, purifying and refining metals was determined for 63 elements.
Sherwood, T. K. Mass Transfer Between Phases (Phi Lambda Upsilon, Pennsylvania State Univ., 1959).
Bardi, U. Extracting minerals from seawater: an energy analysis. Sustainability 2, 980–992 (2010).
Mineral Commodity Summaries 2022 (US Geological Survey, 2022); https://doi.org/10.3133/mcs2022
Liu, C. et al. Lithium extraction from seawater through pulsed electrochemical intercalation. Joule 4, 1459–1469 (2020). This study applies intercalation electrodes to remove lithium from seawater with high selectivity over other interfering species.
Quinby-Hunt, M. S. & Turekian, K. K. Distribution of elements in sea water. Eos 64, 130–132 (1983).
Discharge Monitoring Reports (US EPA, 2022); https://echo.epa.gov/trends/loading-tool/water-pollution-search
Technical Development Document for the Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Oil and Gas Extraction Point Source Category (US EPA, 2016).
An, J. W. et al. Recovery of lithium from Uyuni salar brine. Hydrometallurgy 117–118, 64–70 (2012).
Warren, I. Techno-Economic Analysis of Lithium Extraction from Geothermal Brines (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2021); https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy21osti/79178.pdf
Development Document for Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Centralized Waste Treatment Industry—Final (US EPA, 2000).
Jain, R. et al. Recovery of gallium from wafer fabrication industry wastewaters by desferrioxamine B and E using reversed-phase chromatography approach. Water Res. 158, 203–212 (2020).
Jones, E. et al. The state of desalination and brine production: a global outlook. Sci. Total Environ. 657, 1343–1356 (2019).
Rene, E. R. & Lewis, A. Sustainable Heavy Metal Remediation Volume 1: Principles and Processes vol. 8 (2017).
Gupta, C. K. & Krishnamurthy, N. Extractive Metallurgy of Rare Earths (CRC, 2005).
Ritt, C. L. et al. Machine learning reveals key ion selectivity mechanisms in polymeric membranes with subnanometer pores. Sci. Adv. 5771, eabl5771 (2022).
Helfferich, F. Ion Exchange (McGraw-Hill, 1962).
SenGupta, A. K. Ion Exchange in Environmental Processes: Fundamentals, Applications and Sustainable Technology (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2017).
Kim, D. et al. Selective extraction of rare earth elements from permanent magnet scraps with membrane solvent extraction. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 9452–9459 (2015).
Baker, R. Membrane Technology and Applications (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2012).
Fuller, T. F. & Harb, J. N. Electrochemical Engineering (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2018).
Su, X. Electrochemical separations for metal recycling. Electrochem. Soc. Interface 29, 54–61 (2020).
Biesheuvel, P. M., Porada, S. & Dykstra, J. E. The difference between Faradaic and non-Faradaic electrode processes. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.02930 (2018).
Porada, S., Zhao, R., Van Der Wal, A., Presser, V. & Biesheuvel, P. M. Review on the science and technology of water desalination by capacitive deionization. Prog. Mater Sci. 58, 1388–1442 (2013).
Jacobson, A. J. & Nazar, L. F. in Encyclopedia of Inorganic Chemistry (eds King, R. B. et al.) https://doi.org/10.1002/0470862106.ia098 (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2006).
Gamaethiralalage, J. G. et al. Recent advances in ion selectivity with capacitive deionization. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 1095–1120 (2021).
Eliad, L., Salitra, G., Soffer, A. & Aurbach, D. Ion sieving effects in the electrical double layer of porous carbon electrodes: estimating effective ion size in electrolytic solutions. J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 6880–6887 (2001).
Hawks, S. A. et al. Using ultramicroporous carbon for the selective removal of nitrate with capacitive deionization. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 10863–10870 (2019).
Liao, Y., Wang, M. & Chen, D. Electrosorption of uranium(VI) by highly porous phosphate-functionalized graphene hydrogel. Appl. Surf. Sci. 484, 83–96 (2019). This study chemically functionalized electrodes to obtain uranium selectivity over other metals.
Hand, S., Guest, J. S. & Cusick, R. D. Technoeconomic analysis of brackish water capacitive deionization: navigating tradeoffs between performance, lifetime, and material costs. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 13353–13363 (2019).
Hand, S. & Cusick, R. D. Emerging investigator series: capacitive deionization for selective removal of nitrate and perchlorate: Impacts of ion selectivity and operating constraints on treatment costs. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 6, 925–934 (2020).
Yi, H. et al. Structure and properties of Prussian blue analogues in energy storage and conversion applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2006970 (2021).
Zhou, J. et al. Layered intercalation materials. Adv. Mater. 33, 2004557 (2021).
Lee, J., Yu, S. H., Kim, C., Sung, Y. E. & Yoon, J. Highly selective lithium recovery from brine using a λ-MnO2-Ag battery. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 7690–7695 (2013).
Guo, Z. Y., Ji, Z. Y., Wang, J., Guo, X. F. & Liang, J. S. Electrochemical lithium extraction based on ‘rocking-chair’ electrode system with high energy-efficient: the driving mode of constant current-constant voltage. Desalination 533, 115767 (2022).
Zhao, A. L., Liu, J. C., Ai, X. P., Yang, H. X. & Cao, Y. L. Highly selective and pollution-free electrochemical extraction of lithium by a polyaniline/LixMn2O4 Cell. ChemSusChem 12, 1361–1367 (2019).
Trócoli, R., Battistel, A. & Mantia, F. L. Selectivity of a lithium-recovery process based on LiFePO4. Chem. Eur. J. 20, 9888–9891 (2014).
Shi, W. et al. Berlin green-based battery deionization-highly selective potassium recovery in seawater. Electrochim. Acta 310, 104–112 (2019).
Wu, L. et al. Lithium recovery using electrochemical technologies: advances and challenges. Water Res. 221, 118822 (2022).
Park, H. B., Kamcev, J., Robeson, L. M., Elimelech, M. & Freeman, B. D. Maximizing the right stuff: the trade-off between membrane permeability and selectivity. Science 356, eaab0530 (2017).
He, R. et al. Unprecedented Mg2+/Li+ separation using layer-by-layer based nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes. Desalination 525, 115492 (2022).
Warnock, S. J., Sujanani, R., Zofchak, E. S., Zhao, S. & Dilenschneider, T. J. Engineering Li/Na selectivity in 12-crown-4 functionalized polymer membranes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2022197118 (2021).
Doyle, D. A. et al. The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of k+ conduction and selectivity. Science 280, 69–77 (1998).
Gouaux, E. & MacKinnon, R. Principles of selective ion transport in channels and pumps. Science 310, 1461–1465 (2005).
DuChanois, R. M. et al. Designing polymeric membranes with coordination chemistry for high-precision ion separations. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm9436 (2022).
Zuo, K. et al. Selective membranes in water and wastewater treatment: role of advanced materials. Mater. Today 50, 516–532 (2021).
Chen, F. et al. Pyridine/oxadiazole‐based helical foldamer ion channels with exceptionally high K+/Na+ selectivity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 132, 1456–1460 (2020).
Lu, J. et al. Efficient metal ion sieving in rectifying subnanochannels enabled by metal–organic frameworks. Nat. Mater. 19, 767–774 (2020).
Guo, Y., Ying, Y., Mao, Y., Peng, X. & Chen, B. Polystyrene sulfonate threaded through a metal-organic framework membrane for fast and selective lithium-ion separation. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 55, 15120–15124 (2016). Metal–organic frameworks were used to develop membranes with a selectivity of 1,815 for lithium over magnesium.
Hou, L. et al. Understanding the ion transport behavior across nanofluidic membranes in response to the charge variations. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2009970 (2021).
Sholl, D. S. & Lively, R. P. Seven chemical separations to change the world. Nature 532, 435–437 (2016).
Kilmartin, C. P., Ouimet, J. A., Dowling, A. W. & Phillip, W. A. Staged diafiltration cascades provide opportunities to execute highly selective separations. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 60, 15706–15719 (2021).
Can Sener, S. E. et al. Recovery of critical metals from aqueous sources. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 9, 11616–11634 (2021).
Kumar, A., Fukuda, H., Hatton, T. A. & Lienhard, J. H. Lithium recovery from oil and gas produced water: a need for a growing energy industry. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 1471–1474 (2019).
Kato, T. et al. Transport of ions and electrons in nanostructured liquid crystals. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 17001 (2017).
Xu, T. et al. Highly cation permselective metal–organic framework membranes with leaf-like morphology. ChemSusChem 12, 2593–2597 (2019).
Sheng, F. et al. Efficient ion sieving in covalent organic framework membranes with sub-2-nanometer channels. Adv. Mater. 33, 2104404 (2021).
Wang, L. et al. Novel positively charged metal-coordinated nanofiltration membrane for lithium recovery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 16906–16915 (2021).
Afsar, N. U. et al. Cation exchange membrane integrated with cationic and anionic layers for selective ion separation via electrodialysis. Desalination 458, 25–33 (2019).
Qiu, Y. et al. Study on recovering high-concentration lithium salt from lithium- containing wastewater using a hybrid reverse osmosis (RO) − electrodialysis (ED) process. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 7, 13491–13490 (2019).
Kim, S., Kim, J., Kim, S., Lee, J. & Yoon, J. Electrochemical lithium recovery and organic pollutant removal from industrial wastewater of a battery recycling plant. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 4, 175–182 (2018).
Smolinski, T. et al. Solvent extraction of Cu, Mo, V, and U from leach solutions of copper ore and flotation tailings. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 314, 69–75 (2017).
Mudd, G. M. Assessing the availability of global metals and minerals for the sustainable century: from aluminium to zirconium. Sustainability 13, 10855 (2021).
Rodríguez, O. et al. Recovery of niobium and tantalum by solvent extraction from Sn-Ta-Nb mining tailings. RSC Adv. 10, 21406–21412 (2020).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge support received from the US–Israel Binational Science Foundation (grant number CBET-2110138) and the US National Science Foundation (NSF) through the Nanosystems Engineering Research Center for Nanotechnology-Enabled Water Treatment (grant number EEC-1449500). R.M.D. acknowledges the Abel Wolman Fellowship from the American Water Works Association (AWWA), N.J.C. acknowledges the eFellows Postdoctoral Fellowship from the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE, NSF grant number EEC-2127509), S.K.P. acknowledges the American Membrane Technology Association (AMTA) and Bureau of Reclamation Fellowship for Membrane Technology and L.M. acknowledges the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship. The contents of this Perspective are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NSF, AWWA, ASEE, AMTA or Bureau of Reclamation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Water thanks Manhong Huang, Shiqiang Zou and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
DuChanois, R.M., Cooper, N.J., Lee, B. et al. Prospects of metal recovery from wastewater and brine. Nat Water 1, 37–46 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-022-00006-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-022-00006-z
This article is cited by
-
Precision ion separation via self-assembled channels
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Roll-to-roll fabrication of large-area metal–organic framework-based membranes for high-performance aqueous separations
Nature Water (2024)
-
Heavy metal decontamination by ion exchange polymers for water purification: counterintuitive cation removal by an anion exchange polymer
Journal of Materials Science (2024)
-
Ceramic thin-film composite membranes with tunable subnanometer pores for molecular sieving
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Assessing the economic viability of unconventional rare earth element feedstocks
Nature Sustainability (2023)