Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Counting steps

Nature Synthesis volume 2, pages 6–8 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

The use of step count as a metric of synthetic efficiency carries opportunities and challenges. Here, proposals are made to standardize what constitutes a synthetic step and how steps are counted. These proposals may be beneficial in the holistic evaluation of published synthetic routes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Defining and reporting synthetic steps.

References

  1. Interstellar (Paramount Pictures Corporation & Warner Bros. Pictures, 2014).

  2. Feng, J., Kasun, Z. A. & Krische, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 5467–5478 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chu, H., Smith, J. M., Felding, J. & Baran, P. S. ACS Cent. Sci. 3, 47–51 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Peplow, M. One small step... Chemistry World (24 January 2017); go.nature.com/3Vb3waM

  5. Qiu, F. Can. J. Chem. 86, 903–906 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dach, R., Song, J. J., Roschangar, F., Samstag, W. & Senanayake, C. H. Org. Process Res. Dev. 16, 1697–1706 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hayashi, Y. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 1385–1398 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Clarke, P. A., Santos, S. & Martin, W. H. C. Green Chem. 9, 438–440 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Evans, D. A., Bender, S. L. & Morris, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110, 2506–2526 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Trost, B. M. Science 254, 1471–1477 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaiser, D., Yang, J. & Wuitschik, G. Org. Process Res. Dev. 22, 1222–1235 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Andraos, J. Pure Appl. Chem. 83, 1361–1378 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rossen, K. J. Org. Chem. 84, 4580–4582 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks members of his research team, Michael Krische (University of Texas at Austin), Michael Crimmins, Erik Alexanian (both University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) and Xin Linghu (Ideaya Biosciences), for stimulating discussions. The synthetic work of the author’s research team is supported by NSF CHE-1954835 and NIH R35 GM 118055. Dedicated to David A. Evans (1941–2022).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

    Jeffrey S. Johnson

Authors
  1. Jeffrey S. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey S. Johnson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Synthesis thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johnson, J.S. Counting steps. Nat. Synth 2, 6–8 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44160-022-00204-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44160-022-00204-3

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing