Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

The crucial role of linearity when comparing effects across studies

Nature Reviews Psychology volume 2, pages 516–517 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Comparing effect sizes between studies is critical for evaluating empirical evidence and gaining a broader understanding of underlying phenomena. However, many effects in psychology are nonlinear, which causes problems for interpreting such comparisons and meta-analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Linear and nonlinear relationships.

References

  1. Gurevitch, J., Koricheva, J., Nakagawa, S. & Stewart, G. Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis. Nature 555, 175–182 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Algom, D. The Weber-Fechner law: a misnomer that persists but that should go away. Psychol. Rev. 128, 757–765 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yerkes, R. M. & Dodson, J. D. The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. J. Comp. Neurol. Psychol. 18, 459–482 (1908).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stevenson, B. & Wolfers, J. Subjective well-being and income: is there any evidence of satiation? Am. Econ. Rev. 103, 598–604 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bless, H. & Burger, A. M. A closer look at social psychologists’ silver bullet: inevitable and evitable side effects of the experimental approach. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 11, 296–308 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kahnemann, D. & Tversky, A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica 47, 263–292 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., Vevea, J. L., Citkowicz, M. & Lauber, E. A. A re-examination of the mere exposure effect: the influence of repeated exposure on recognition, familiarity, and liking. Psychol. Bull. 143, 459–498 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bless, H. & Schwarz, N. Mental construal and the emergence of assimilation and contrast effects: the inclusion/exclusion model. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 42, 319–373 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lipsey, M. W. & Wilson, D. B. Practical Meta-Analysis (Sage, 2000).

  10. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211, 453–458 (1981).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany

    Herbert Bless & Michaela Wänke

Authors
  1. Herbert Bless
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michaela Wänke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Herbert Bless.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bless, H., Wänke, M. The crucial role of linearity when comparing effects across studies. Nat Rev Psychol 2, 516–517 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00220-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00220-w

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing