Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

A sociohistorical model of intersectional social category prototypes

Nature Reviews Psychology volume 2, pages 297–308 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Every person belongs to multiple social categories, such as those based on gender, race, or ethnicity, yet researchers have traditionally studied beliefs about each of these groups in isolation. Theoretical perspectives have emerged that aim to outline how people’s mental representations of gender and race or ethnicity are systematically intertwined. These intersectional perspectives have been generative, but there remain areas of ostensible disagreement that create conceptual confusion. In this Perspective, we suggest that a sociohistorical approach can help to reconcile these differences by highlighting how previous theories offer complementary, rather than conflicting, insights into the structure of social concepts. Specifically, we propose that a sociohistorical model integrating research across social science fields (history, anthropology, sociology and psychology) could illuminate how people construct mental representations that align with their surrounding social and cultural systems, which reflect the goals of the dominant gender and ethnic or racial group. By encoding these cultural ideals in mental representations of what members of social categories are like, people’s prototypes reinforce social hierarchies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: A sociohistorical model of social prototypes.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosch, E. & Mervis, C. B. Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cogn. Psychol. 7, 573–605 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Medin, D. L., Lynch, E. B. & Solomon, K. O. Are there kinds of concepts? Annu. Rev. Psychol. 51, 121–147 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hampton, J. A. in Psychology of Learning and Motivation Vol. 46 (ed. Ross, B. H.) 79–113 (Elsevier, 2006).

  4. Osherson, D. N., Smith, E. E., Wilkie, O., López, A. & Shafir, E. Category-based induction. Psychol. Rev. 97, 185–200 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Diesendruck, G. Categories for names or names for categories? The interplay between domain-specific conceptual structure and language. Lang. Cogn. Process. 18, 759–787 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gelman, S. A. The Essential Child: Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought (Oxford Univ. Press, 2003).

  7. Gelman, S. A. & Coley, J. D. The importance of knowing a dodo is a bird: categories and inferences in 2-year-old children. Dev. Psychol. 26, 796–804 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Keil, F. C. Concepts, Kinds, And Cognitive Development (MIT Press, 1992).

  9. Rosette, A. S., Leonardelli, G. J. & Phillips, K. W. The White standard: racial bias in leader categorization. J. Appl. Psychol. 93, 758–777 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schein, V. E., Mueller, R., Lituchy, T. & Liu, J. Think manager — think male: a global phenomenon? J. Organ. Behav. 17, 33–41 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Roberts, S. O. et al. God as a white man: a psychological barrier to conceptualizing Black people and women as leadership worthy. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 119, 1290–1315 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson, K. L., Freeman, J. B. & Pauker, K. Race is gendered: how covarying phenotypes and stereotypes bias sex categorization. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 102, 116–131 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lei, R. F., Leshin, R. A., Moty, K., Foster-Hanson, E. & Rhodes, M. How race and gender shape the development of social prototypes in the United States. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 151, 1956–1971 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cole, E. R. Intersectionality and research in psychology. Am. Psychol. 64, 170–180 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Crenshaw, K. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. Univ. Chic. Leg. Forum 1989, 139 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Purdie-Vaughns, V. & Eibach, R. P. Intersectional invisibility: the distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex. Roles 59, 377–391 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Eagly, A. H. & Kite, M. E. Are stereotypes of nationalities applied to both women and men? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 53, 451–462 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P. & Xu, J. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82, 878–902 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Berdahl, J. L. & Min, J.-A. Prescriptive stereotypes and workplace consequences for East Asians in North America. Cultur. Divers. Ethnic Minor. Psychol. 18, 141–152 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sidanius, J., Hudson, S. T. J., Davis, G. & Bergh, R. in The Oxford Handbook of Behavioral Political Science (eds Mintz, A. & Terris, L. G.) (Oxford Univ. Press, 2018).

  21. Nicolas, G., de la Fuente, M. & Fiske, S. T. Mind the overlap in multiple categorization: a review of crossed categorization, intersectionality, and multiracial perception. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 20, 621–631 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rosch, E. H. Natural categories. Cogn. Psychol. 4, 328–350 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hull, A. G., Hull, G. T., Bell-Scott, P. & Smith, B. All The Women Are White, All The Blacks Are Men, But Some Of Us Are Brave: Black Women’s Studies (Feminist Press, 2015).

  24. Lei, R. F. & Rhodes, M. Why developmental research on social categorization needs intersectionality. Child. Dev. Perspect. 15, 143–147 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kinzler, K. D., Shutts, K. & Correll, J. Priorities in social categories. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 40, 581–592 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee, J. & Ramakrishnan, K. Who counts as Asian. Ethn. Racial Stud. 43, 1733–1756 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Richeson, J. A. & Sommers, S. R. Toward a social psychology of race and race relations for the twenty-first century. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 67, 439–463 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sesko, A. K. & Biernat, M. Prototypes of race and gender: the invisibility of Black women. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 46, 356–360 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Thomas, E. L., Dovidio, J. F. & West, T. V. Lost in the categorical shuffle: evidence for the social non-prototypicality of Black women. Cultur. Divers. Ethnic Minor. Psychol. 20, 370–376 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ghavami, N. & Peplau, L. A. An intersectional analysis of gender and ethnic stereotypes: testing three hypotheses. Psychol. Women Q. 37, 113–127 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Livingston, R. W. & Rosette, A. S. in Inclusive Leadership (eds Ferdman, B. M., Prime, J. & Riggio, R. E.) 39–59 (Routledge, 2020).

  32. Livingston, R. W., Rosette, A. S. & Washington, E. F. Can an agentic Black woman get ahead? The impact of race and interpersonal dominance on perceptions of female leaders. Psychol. Sci. 23, 354–358 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. McDonald, M. M., Navarrete, C. D. & Sidanius, J. in Social Cognition, Social Identity, and Intergroup Relations (Psychology Press, 2011).

  34. Sidanius, J. & Pratto, F. Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory Of Social Hierarchy And Oppression (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001).

  35. Zhang, Y., Zhang, L. & Benton, F. Hate crimes against Asian Americans. Am. J. Crim. Justice 47, 441–461 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dahl, M. & Krog, N. Experimental evidence of discrimination in the labour market: intersections between ethnicity, gender, and socio-economic status. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 34, 402–417 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Perszyk, D. R., Lei, R. F., Bodenhausen, G. V., Richeson, J. A. & Waxman, S. R. Bias at the intersection of race and gender: evidence from preschool‐aged children. Dev. Sci. 22, e12788 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Galinsky, A. D., Hall, E. V. & Cuddy, A. J. C. Gendered races: implications for interracial marriage, leadership selection, and athletic participation. Psychol. Sci. 24, 498–506 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schug, J., Alt, N. P. & Klauer, K. C. Gendered race prototypes: evidence for the non-prototypicality of Asian men and Black women. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 56, 121–125 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rudder, C. Dataclysm: Love, Sex, Race, And Identity–what Our Online Lives Tell Us About Our Offline Selves (Crown, 2014).

  41. Powell, G. N. & Butterfield, D. A. The role of androgyny in leader prototypes over four decades. Gend. Manag. Int. J. 30, 69–86 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Settles, I. H., Warner, L. R., Buchanan, N. T. & Jones, M. K. Understanding psychology’s resistance to intersectionality theory using a framework of epistemic exclusion and invisibility. J. Soc. Issues 76, 796–813 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zou, L. X. & Cheryan, S. Two axes of subordination: a new model of racial position. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 112, 696–717 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Barsalou, L. W. Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 11, 629–654 (1985).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Borkenau, P. Traits as ideal-based and goal-derived social categories. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58, 381–396 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Burnett, R. C., Medin, D. L., Ross, N. O. & Blok, S. V. Ideal is typical. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. Can. Psychol. Expérimentale 59, 3–10 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Chaplin, W. F., John, O. P. & Goldberg, L. R. Conceptions of states and traits: dimensional attributes with ideals as prototypes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54, 541–557 (1988).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lynch, E. B., Coley, J. D. & Medin, D. L. Tall is typical: central tendency, ideal dimensions, and graded category structure among tree experts and novices. Mem. Cogn. 28, 41–50 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Read, S. J., Jones, D. K. & Miller, L. C. Traits as goal-based categories: the importance of goals in the coherence of dispositional categories. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58, 1048–1061 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Neel, R. & Lassetter, B. The stigma of perceived irrelevance: an affordance-management theory of interpersonal invisibility. Psychol. Rev. 126, 634–659 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kim, S. & Murphy, G. L. Ideals and category typicality. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 37, 1092–1112 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Lombrozo, T. & Carey, S. Functional explanation and the function of explanation. Cognition 99, 167–204 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Murphy, G. L. & Medin, D. L. The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychol. Rev. 92, 289–316 (1985).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Foster-Hanson, E. & Rhodes, M. Is the most representative skunk the average or the stinkiest? Developmental changes in representations of biological categories. Cogn. Psychol. 110, 1–15 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Lombrozo, T. & Rehder, B. Functions in biological kind classification. Cogn. Psychol. 65, 457–485 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. The ambivalent sexism inventory: differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 70, 491–512 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Foster-Hanson, E. & Rhodes, M. Stereotypes as prototypes in children’s gender concepts. Dev. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13345 (2022).

  58. Ridgeway, C. L. & Erickson, K. G. Creating and spreading status beliefs. Am. J. Sociol. 106, 579–615 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Grofman, B. N. & Davidson, C. Controversies In Minority Voting: The Voting Rights Act In Perspective (Brookings Institution Press, 2011).

  60. Sue, D. W. Whiteness and ethnocentric monoculturalism: making the ‘invisible’ visible. Am. Psychol. 59, 761–769 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Cheryan, S. & Markus, H. R. Masculine defaults: identifying and mitigating hidden cultural biases. Psychol. Rev. 127, 1022–1052 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Coates, T.-N. in The Best American Magazine Writing 2015 (ed. Holt, S.) (Columbia Univ. Press, 2015).

  63. Devine, P. G. Stereotypes and prejudice: their automatic and controlled components. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 56, 5–18 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Eagly, A. H. & Wood, W. Social role theory. In Handbook Of Theories Of Social Psychology 458–476 (Sage Publications, 2012).

  65. Foster-Hanson, E. & Lombrozo, T. How “is” shapes “ought” for folk-biological concepts. Cogn. Psychol. 139, 101507 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Ojalehto, B. L. & Medin, D. L. Perspectives on culture and concepts. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 66, 249–275 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Cimpian, A. & Salomon, E. The inherence heuristic: an intuitive means of making sense of the world, and a potential precursor to psychological essentialism. Behav. Brain Sci. 37, 461–480 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Hussak, L. J. & Cimpian, A. An early-emerging explanatory heuristic promotes support for the status quo. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 109, 739–752 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Grigoryan, L. et al. Stereotypes as historical accidents: images of social class in postcommunist versus capitalist societies. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 46, 927–943 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Petsko, C. D. & Bodenhausen, G. V. Multifarious person perception: how social perceivers manage the complexity of intersectional targets. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 14, e12518 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Hinsz, V. B., Matz, D. C. & Patience, R. A. Does women’s hair signal reproductive potential? J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 37, 166–172 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Mukkamala, S. & Suyemoto, K. L. Racialized sexism/sexualized racism: a multimethod study of intersectional experiences of discrimination for Asian American women. Asian Am. J. Psychol. 9, 32–46 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Katz, D. & Braly, K. Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 28, 280–290 (1933).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Karlins, M., Coffman, T. L. & Walters, G. On the fading of social stereotypes: studies in three generations of college students. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 13, 1–16 (1969).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Zong, J. & Batalova, J. Immigrants from Asia in the United States. migrationpolicy.org https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/asian-immigrants-united-states-2014 (2016).

  76. Helms, J. E., Jernigan, M. & Mascher, J. The meaning of race in psychology and how to change it: a methodological perspective. Am. Psychol. 60, 27–36 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Major, B. & O’Brien, L. T. The social psychology of stigma. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 56, 393–421 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Payne, B. K., Vuletich, H. A. & Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L. Historical roots of implicit bias in slavery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 11693–11698 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Hall, A. B., Huff, C. & Kuriwaki, S. Wealth, slaveownership, and fighting for the confederacy: an empirical study of the American civil war. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 113, 658–673 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Davis, A. Reflections on the Black woman’s role in the community of slaves. Black Sch. 12, 2–15 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Wood, W. & Eagly, A. H. in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol. 46 (eds, Zanna, M. P. & Olson, J. M.) 55–123 (Elsevier, 2012).

  82. Devine, P. G. & Elliot, A. J. Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton Trilogy revisited. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 21, 1139–1150 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Lei, R. F., Leshin, R. A. & Rhodes, M. The development of intersectional social prototypes. Psychol. Sci. 31, 911–926 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Okonofua, J. A. & Eberhardt, J. L. Two strikes: race and the disciplining of young students. Psychol. Sci. 26, 617–624 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Hwang, M. C. & Parreñas, R. S. The gendered racialization of Asian women as villainous temptresses. Gend. Soc. 35, 567–576 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Lee, E. The Making Of Asian America: A History (Simon & Schuster, 2015).

  87. Lee, E. The Chinese exclusion example: race, immigration, and American gatekeeping, 1882–1924. J. Am. Ethn. Hist. 21, 36–62 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Wang, J. S. Race, gender, and laundry work: the roles of Chinese laundrymen and American women in the United States, 1850–1950. J. Am. Ethn. Hist. 24, 58–99 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Woan, S. White sexual imperialism: a theory of Asian feminist jurisprudence. Wash. Lee J. Civ. Rights Soc. Justice 14, 275 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Eagly, A. H. & Koenig, A. M. The vicious cycle linking stereotypes and social roles. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 30, 343–350 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Hogg, M. A. Group cohesiveness: a critical review and some new directions. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 4, 85–111 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Ameel, E. & Storms, G. From prototypes to caricatures: geometrical models for concept typicality. J. Mem. Lang. 55, 402–421 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Davis, T. & Love, B. C. Memory for category information is idealized through contrast with competing options. Psychol. Sci. 21, 234–242 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Turner, J. C. Rediscovering The Social Group: A Self-categorization Theory (Blackwell, 1988).

  95. Said, E. W. Orientalism (Vintage Books, 1979).

  96. Kim, C. J. The racial triangulation of Asian americans. Polit. Soc. 27, 105–138 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Lu, J. G., Nisbett, R. E. & Morris, M. W. Why East Asians but not South Asians are underrepresented in leadership positions in the United States. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 4590–4600 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Massey, D. S. & Liang, Z. The long-term consequences of a temporary worker program: the US Bracero experience. Popul. Res. Policy Rev. 8, 199–226 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Borjas, G. J. & Katz, L. F. The evolution of the Mexican-born workforce in the United States. In Mexican Immigration To The United States 13–56 (Univ. Chicago Press, 2007).

  100. Dovidio, J. F., Gluszek, A., John, M.-S., Ditlmann, R. & Lagunes, P. Understanding bias toward Latinos: discrimination, dimensions of difference, and experience of exclusion. J. Soc. Issues 66, 59–78 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Craig, M. A. & Richeson, J. A. Hispanic population growth engenders conservative shift among non-hispanic racial minorities. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 9, 383–392 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Leavitt, P. A., Covarrubias, R., Perez, Y. A. & Fryberg, S. A. “Frozen in time”: the impact of native American media representations on identity and self-understanding. J. Soc. Issues 71, 39–53 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Fryberg, S. A. & Eason, A. E. Making the invisible visible: acts of commission and omission. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 26, 554–559 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Churchill, W. The crucible of American Indian identity: native tradition versus colonial imposition in postconquest North America. Am. Indian Cult. Res. J. 23, 39–67 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Jaimes, M. A. Federal Indian identification policy: a usurpation of indigenous sovereignty in North America. Policy Stud. J. 16, 778–789 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Peery, D. & Bodenhausen, G. V. Black + white = Black: hypodescent in reflexive categorization of racially ambiguous faces. Psychol. Sci. 19, 973–977 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Spruhan, P. A legal history of blood quantum in federal Indian law to 1935. S. Dakota Law Rev. 51, 1–50 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  108. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W. & Diekman, A. B. in The Developmental Social Psychology Of Gender 123–174 (Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000).

  109. England, E. M. College student gender stereotypes: expectations about the behavior of male subcategory members. Sex. Roles 27, 699–716 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Glauber, R. Race and gender in families and at work: the fatherhood wage premium. Gend. Soc. 22, 8–30 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Hodges, M. J. & Budig, M. J. Who gets the daddy bonus?: organizational hegemonic masculinity and the impact of fatherhood on earnings. Gend. Soc. 24, 717–745 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Pascoe, P. What Comes Naturally: Miscegenation Law And The Making Of Race In America (Oxford Univ. Press, 2009).

  113. Rosenthal, L. & Lobel, M. Stereotypes of Black American women related to sexuality and motherhood. Psychol. Women Q. 40, 414–427 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Cuddy, A. J. C. & Wolf, E. B. in Gender & Work: Challenging Conventional Wisdom 35–42 (Harvard Business School).

  115. Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., Dotsch, R., Cooley, E. & Payne, B. K. The relationship between mental representations of welfare recipients and attitudes toward welfare. Psychol. Sci. 28, 92–103 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Zinn, H. A People’s History Of The United States: 1492–Present (Harper Collins, 2003).

  117. Kessler-Harris, A. Out To Work: A History Of Wage-earning Women In The United States (Oxford Univ. Press, 2003).

  118. Rule, N. O., Ambady, N., Adams, R. B. & Macrae, C. N. Accuracy and awareness in the perception and categorization of male sexual orientation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 95, 1019–1028 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Petsko, C. D. & Bodenhausen, G. V. Racial stereotyping of gay men: can a minority sexual orientation erase race? J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 83, 37–54 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Westerfelhaus, R. & Lacroix, C. Seeing “straight” through Queer Eye: exposing the strategic rhetoric of heteronormativity in a mediated ritual of gay rebellion. Crit. Stud. Media Commun. 23, 426–444 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Tribou, A. & Collins, K. This is how fast America changes its mind. Bloomberg.com http://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2015-pace-of-social-change/ (2015).

  122. Rosario, M., Schrimshaw, E. W. & Hunter, J. Ethnic/racial differences in the coming-out process of lesbian, gay, and bisexual youths: a comparison of sexual identity development over time. Cultur. Divers. Ethnic Minor. Psychol. 10, 215–228 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Asante, G., Sekimoto, S. & Brown, C. Becoming “Black”: exploring the racialized experiences of African immigrants in the United States. Howard J. Commun. 27, 367–384 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Moffitt, U., Juang, L. P. & Syed, M. Intersectionality and youth identity development research in Europe. Front. Psychol. 11, 78 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Guo, R. China Ethnic Statistical Yearbook 2020 (Springer Nature, 2020).

  126. Goh, J. X. & McCue, J. Perceived prototypicality of Asian subgroups in the United States and the United Kingdom. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 97, 104201 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Watkins, M., Ho, C. & Butler, R. Asian migration and education cultures in the Anglo-sphere. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 43, 2283–2299 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Bhandari, S. in South Asians In The United States: A Guide For Social Workers And Other Helping Professionals Ch. 1 (NASW Press, 2022).

  129. Stillwell, A. & Lowery, B. S. Gendered racial boundary maintenance: social penalties for white women in interracial relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 121, 548–572 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Levin, D. T. & Banaji, M. R. Evidence for hypodescent and racial hierarchy in the categorization and perception of biracial individuals. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 100, 492–506 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Lee, J. & Bean, F. D. America’s changing color lines: immigration, race/ethnicity, and multiracial identification. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 30, 221–242 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Fry, R., Kennedy, B. & Funk, C. STEM jobs see uneven progress in increasing gender, racial and ethnic diversity. Pew Research https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2021/04/01/stem-jobs-see-uneven-progress-in-increasing-gender-racial-and-ethnic-diversity/ (2021).

  133. Beal, F. M. Double jeopardy: to be black and female. Meridians 8, 166–176 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Levin, S., Sinclair, S., Veniegas, R. C. & Taylor, P. L. Perceived discrimination in the context of multiple group memberships. Psychol. Sci. 13, 557–560 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Settles, I. H., Pratt-Hyatt, J. S. & Buchanan, N. T. Through the lens of race: Black and white women’s perceptions of womanhood. Psychol. Women Q. 32, 454–468 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  136. Mims, L. C. & Williams, J. L. “They told me what I was before I could tell them what I was”: Black girls’ ethnic-racial identity development within multiple worlds. J. Adolesc. Res. 35, 754–779 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Trawalter, S., Higginbotham, G. D. & Henderson, K. Social psychological research on racism and the importance of historical context: implications for policy. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221114092 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Phills, C. E. et al. Intersecting race and gender stereotypes: implications for group-level attitudes. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 21, 1172–1184 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Navarrete, C. D. et al. Fear extinction to an out-group face: the role of target gender. Psychol. Sci. 20, 155–158 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Navarrete, C. D., McDonald, M. M., Molina, L. E. & Sidanius, J. Prejudice at the nexus of race and gender: an outgroup male target hypothesis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 98, 933–945 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Plant, E. A., Goplen, J. & Kunstman, J. W. Selective responses to threat: the roles of race and gender in decisions to shoot. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 37, 1274–1281 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Hall, E. V., Galinsky, A. D. & Phillips, K. W. Gender profiling: a gendered race perspective on person–position fit. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 41, 853–868 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Roberts, S. O. & Rizzo, M. T. The psychology of American racism. Am. Psychol. 76, 475–487 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank M. Rhodes, T. Mandalaywala, G. Bodenhausen and the Conceptual Development and Social Cognition laboratory. Support for this manuscript comes from an NSF grant awarded to R.F.L. (BCS-2122112).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Haverford College, Haverford, PA, USA

    Ryan F. Lei

  2. Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA

    Emily Foster-Hanson

  3. Department of Psychology, Colby College, Waterville, ME, USA

    Jin X. Goh

Authors
  1. Ryan F. Lei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emily Foster-Hanson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jin X. Goh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

R.F.L. drafted the article with input from E.F.-H. and J.X.G. All authors contributed to revisions of the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan F. Lei.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Psychology thanks Lin Bian, Sa-Kiera Hudson and Amanda Sesko for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lei, R.F., Foster-Hanson, E. & Goh, J.X. A sociohistorical model of intersectional social category prototypes. Nat Rev Psychol 2, 297–308 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00165-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00165-0

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing