Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

The double-edged sword of memory retrieval

Abstract

Accurately retrieving information from memory boosts later retrieval. However, retrieving memories can also open a window to errors when erroneous information is retrieved or when new information is encoded during retrieval. Similarly, the process of retrieval can influence recall of related information, either inhibiting or facilitating it depending upon the situation. In addition, retrieving or attempting to retrieve information can facilitate encoding of new information, regardless of whether the new information is correct or incorrect. In this Review, we provide selective coverage of the influences of memory retrieval in three distinct arenas: effects on the retrieved information itself, effects on retrieval of related information, and effects on information encoded just after an event is retrieved. Consideration of both positive and negative effects of retrieval in these three domains is critically important to understanding the complexity of retrieval processes and their effects. We discuss episodic context as a conceptual umbrella relevant to all these retrieval effects and note key directions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Four stages of memory.
Fig. 2: Retrieval effects on the retrieved information.
Fig. 3: Retrieval effects on related information.
Fig. 4: Retrieval effects on subsequent encoding.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roediger, H. L. in Memory, Consciousness And The Brain: The Tallinn Conference (ed. Tulving, E.) 52–75 (Psychology Press, 2000).

  2. Bluck, S., Alea, N., Habermas, T. & Rubin, D. C. A tale of three functions: the self-reported uses of autobiographical memory. Soc. Cogn. 23, 91–117 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Raaijmakers, J. G. W. & Shiffrin, R. M. Search of associative memory. Psychol. Rev. 88, 93–134 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith, S. M. & Vela, E. Environmental context-dependent memory: a review and meta-analysis. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 8, 203–220 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith, S. M. & Manzano, I. Video context-dependent recall. Behav. Res. Methods 42, 292–301 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shin, Y. S., Masís-Obando, R., Keshavarzian, N., Dáve, R. & Norman, K. A. Context-dependent memory effects in two immersive virtual reality environments: on Mars and underwater. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 28, 574–582 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tulving, E. & Thomson, D. M. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychol. Rev. 80, 352–373 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carrier, M. & Pashler, H. The influence of retrieval on retention. Mem. Cogn. 20, 633–642 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Roediger, H. L. & Karpicke, J. D. Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychol. Sci. 17, 249–255 (2006a).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Roediger, H. L. & Karpicke, J. D. The power of testing memory: basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 1, 181–210 (2006b).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Carpenter, S. K. & Kelly, J. W. Tests enhance retention and transfer of spatial learning. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 19, 443–448 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schuetze, B. A., Eglington, L. G. & Kang, S. H. K. Retrieval practice benefits memory precision. Memory 27, 1091–1098 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wheeler, M. A. & Roediger, H. L. Disparate effects of repeated testing: reconciling Ballard’s (1913) and Bartlett’s (1932) results. Psychol. Sci. 3, 240–245 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abel, M. & Roediger, H. L. The testing effect in a social setting: does retrieval practice benefit a listener? J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 24, 347–359 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Butler, A. C. Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 36, 1118–1133 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pan, S. C. & Rickard, T. C. Transfer of test-enhanced learning: meta-analytic review and synthesis. Psychol. Bull. 144, 710–756 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wooldridge, C. L., Bugg, J. M., McDaniel, M. A. & Liu, Y. The testing effect with authentic educational materials: a cautionary note. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn. 3, 214–221 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tran, R., Rohrer, D. & Pashler, H. Retrieval practice: the lack of transfer to deductive inferences. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 22, 135–140 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Adesope, O. O., Trevisan, D. A. & Sundararajan, N. Rethinking the use of tests: a meta-analysis of practice testing. Rev. Educ. Res. 87, 659–701 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rowland, C. A. The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: a meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychol. Bull. 140, 1432–1463 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang, C., Luo, L., Vadillo, M., Yu, R. & Shanks, D. R. Testing (quizzing) boosts classroom learning: a systematic and meta-analytic review. Psychol. Bull. 147, 399–435 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McDermott, K. B. Practicing retrieval facilitates learning. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 72, 609–633 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schwieren, J., Barenberg, J. & Dutke, S. The testing effect in the psychology classroom: a meta-analytic perspective. Psychol. Learn. Teach. 16, 179–196 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Agarwal, P. K., Nunes, L. D. & Blunt, J. R. Retrieval practice consistently benefits student learning: a systematic review of applied research in schools and classrooms. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 33, 1409–1453 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Uner, O., Tekin, E. & Roediger, H. L. True–false tests enhance retention relative to rereading. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 28, 114–129 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pyc, M. A. & Rawson, K. A. Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: does greater difficulty correctly recalling information learn to higher levels of memory? J. Mem. Lang. 60, 437–447 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Landauer, T. K. & Bjork, R. A. in Practical Aspects Of Memory (eds Gruneberg, M. M., Morris, P. E. & Sykes, R. N.) 625–632 (Academic, 1978).

  28. Karpicke, J. D. & Bauernschmidt, A. Spaced retrieval: absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 37, 1250–1257 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Karpicke, J. D. & Roediger, H. L. Is expanding retrieval a superior method for learning text materials? Mem. Cogn. 38, 116–124 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Roediger, H. L. & Karpicke, J. D. in Successful Remembering And Successful Forgetting: Essays In Honor Of Robert A. Bjork (ed. Benjamin, A. S.) 23–48 (Psychology Press, 2011).

  31. Kang, S. H. K., Lindsey, R. V., Mozer, M. C. & Pashler, H. Retrieval practice over the long term: should spacing be expanding or equal-interval? Psychon. Bull. Rev. 21, 1544–1550 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lindsey, R. V., Shroyer, J. D., Pashler, H. & Mozer, M. C. Improving students’ long-term knowledge retention through personalized review. Psychol. Sci. 25, 639–647 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D. & Franks, J. J. Levels of processing versus transfer-appropriate processing. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 16, 519–533 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bjork, R. A. in Information Processing And Cognition: The Loyola Symposium (ed. Solso, R. L.) 123–144 (Lawrence Erlbaum, 1975).

  35. Carpenter, S. K. Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 35, 1563–1569 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Carpenter, S. K. Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention. Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 37, 1547–1552 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Carpenter, S. K. & Yeung, K. L. The role of mediator strength in learning from retrieval. J. Mem. Lang. 92, 128–141 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Pyc, M. A. & Rawson, K. A. Why testing improves memory: mediator effectiveness hypothesis. Science 330, 335 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zaromb, F. M. & Roediger, H. L. III The testing effect in free recall is associated with enhanced organizational processes. Mem. Cogn. 38, 995–1008 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Congleton, A. & Rajaram, S. The origin of the interaction between learning method and delay in the testing effect: the roles of processing and conceptual retrieval organization. Mem. Cogn. 40, 528–539 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lehman, M., Smith, M. A. & Karpicke, J. D. Toward an episodic context account of retrieval-based learning: dissociating retrieval practice and elaboration. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 40, 1787–1794 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Whiffen, J. & Karpicke, J. D. The role of episodic context in retrieval practice effects. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 43, 1036–1046 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Akan, M., Stanley, S. E. & Benjamin, A. S. Testing enhances memory for context. J. Mem. Lang. 103, 19–27 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hong, M. K., Polyn, S. M. & Fazio, L. K. Examining the episodic context account: does retrieval practice enhance memory for context? Cogn. Res. Princip. Impl. 4, 46 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. McDermott, K. B. The persistence of false memories in list recall. J. Mem. Lang. 35, 212–230 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G. & Burns, H. J. Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Learn. Mem. 4, 19–31 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Roediger, H. L., Jacoby, D. & McDermott, K. B. Misinformation effects in recall: creating false memories through repeated retrieval. J. Mem. Lang. 35, 300–318 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Alberini, C. M. & LeDoux, J. E. Memory reconsolidation. Curr. Biol. 17, R746–R750 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Agren, T. Human reconsolidation: a reactivation and update. Brain Res. Bull. 105, 70–82 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lee, J. L. C., Nader, K. & Schiller, D. An update on memory reconsolidation updating. Trends Cogn. Sci. 21, 531–545 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Elsey, J. W. B., Van Ast, V. & Kindt, M. Human memory reconsolidation: a guiding framework and critical review of the evidence. Psychol. Bull. 144, 797–848 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Nader, K., Schafe, G. E. & LeDoux, J. E. Fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval. Nature 406, 722–726 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Nader, K., Schafe, G. E. & LeDoux, J. E. The labile nature of consolidation theory. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 1, 216–219 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wichert, S., Wolf, O. T. & Schwabe, L. Reactivation, interference, and reconsolidation: are recent and remote memories likewise susceptible? Behav. Neurosci. 125, 699–704 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Wichert, S., Wolf, O. T. & Schwabe, L. Updating of episodic memories depends on the strength of new learning after memory reactivation. Behav. Neurosci. 127, 331–338 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Walker, M. P., Brakefield, T., Hobson, J. A. & Stickgold, R. Dissociable stages of human memory consolidation and reconsolidation. Nature 425, 616–620 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hupbach, A., Gomez, R., Hardt, O. & Nadel, L. Reconsolidation of episodic memories: a subtle reminder triggers integration of new information. Learn. Mem. 14, 47–53 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Scully, I. D., Napper, L. E. & Hupbach, A. Does reactivation trigger episodic memory change? A meta-analysis. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 142, 99–107 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Scully, I. D. & Hupbach, A. Different reactivation procedures enable or prevent episodic memory updating. Hippocampus 30, 806–814 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Hardwicke, T. E., Taqi, M. & Shanks, D. R. Postretrieval new learning does not reliably induce human memory updating via reconsolidation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 5206–5211 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Van Schie, K., van Veen, S. C., van den Hout, M. A. & Engelhard, I. M. Modification of episodic memories by novel retrieval: a failed replication study. Eur. J. Psychotraumatol. 8 (suppl. 1), 1315291 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Sederberg, P. B., Gershman, S. J., Polyn, S. M. & Norman, K. A. Human memory reconsolidation can be explained using the temporal context model. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 18, 455–468 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Gershman, S. J., Schapiro, A. C., Hupbach, A. & Norman, K. A. Neural context reinstatement predicts memory misattribution. J. Neurosci. 33, 8590–8695 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Klingmüller, A., Caplan, J. B. & Sommer, T. Intrusions in episodic memory: reconsolidation or interference? Learn. Mem. 24, 216–224 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Dudai, Y. The restless engram: consolidations never end. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 35, 227–247 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. McDermott, K. B. Paradoxical effects of testing: repeated retrieval attempts enhance the likelihood of later accurate and false recall. Mem. Cogn. 34, 261–267 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Deese, J. On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. J. Exp. Psychol. 58, 17–22 (1959).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Roediger, H. L. & McDermott, K. B. Creating false memories: remembering words not presented in lists. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 21, 803–814 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Brown, J. Reciprocal facilitation and impairment in free recall. Psychon. Sci. 10, 41–42 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Roediger, H. L. III Recall as a self-limiting process. Mem. Cogn. 6, 54–63 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Tulving, E. & Arbuckle, T. Y. Sources of intratrial interference in paired-associate learning. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 1, 321–334 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Smith, A. D. Output interference and organized recall from long-term memory. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 10, 400–408 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Roediger, H. L. III & Schmidt, S. R. Output interference in the recall of categorized and paired-associate lists. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Learn. Mem. 6, 91–105 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Bäuml, K.-H. T. & Samenieh, A. The two faces of selective memory retrieval. Psychol. Sci. 21, 793–795 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Aue, W. R., Criss, A. H. & Prince, M. A. Dynamic memory searches: selective output interference for the memory of facts. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 22, 1798–1806 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Roediger, H. L. III Inhibition in recall from cueing with recall targets. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 12, 644–657 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Rundus, D. Negative effects of using list items as recall cues. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 12, 43–50 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Norman, D. A. & Waugh, N. C. Stimulus and response interference in recognition-memory experiments. J. Exp. Psychol. 78, 551–559 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Criss, A. H., Malmberg, K. J. & Shiffrin, R. M. Output interference in recognition memory. J. Mem. Lang. 64, 316–326 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A. & Bjork, E. L. Remembering can cause forgetting: retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 20, 1063–1087 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Anderson, M. C. Rethinking interference theory: executive control and the mechanism of forgetting. J. Mem. Lang. 49, 415–445 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Murayama, K., Miyatsu, T., Buchli, D. & Storm, B. C. Forgetting as a consequence of retrieval: a meta-analytic review of retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychol. Bull. 140, 1383–1409 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Ciranni, M. A. & Shimamura, A. P. Retrieval-induced forgetting in episodic memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 25, 1403–1414 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Barnier, A., Hung, L. & Conway, M. Retrieval-induced forgetting of emotional and unemotional autobiographical memories. Cogn. Emot. 18, 457–477 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Shaw, J. S., Bjork, R. A. & Handal, A. Retrieval-induced forgetting in an eyewitness-memory paradigm. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2, 249–253 (1995).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Cuc, A., Koppel, J. & Hirst, W. Silence is not golden: a case for socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychol. Sci. 18, 727–733 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Abel, M. & Bäuml, K.-H. T. Retrieval-induced forgetting in a social context: do the same mechanisms underlie forgetting in speakers and listeners? Mem. Cogn. 48, 1–15 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Cinel, C., Cortis Mack, C. & Ward, G. Towards augmented human memory: retrieval-induced forgetting and retrieval practice in an interactive, end-of-day review. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 147, 632–661 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Anderson, M. C. & Spellman, B. A. On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: memory retrieval as a model case. Psychol. Rev. 102, 68–100 (1995).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Raaijmakers, J. G. W. & Jakab, E. Rethinking inhibition theory: on the problematic status of the inhibition theory for forgetting. J. Mem. Lang. 68, 98–122 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Verde, M. F. Retrieval-induced forgetting in recall: competitor interference revisited. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 39, 1433–1448 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Schilling, C. J., Storm, B. C. & Anderson, M. C. Examining the costs and benefits of inhibition in memory retrieval. Cognition 133, 358–370 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Rupprecht, J. & Bäuml, K.-H. T. Retrieval-induced forgetting in item recognition: retrieval specificity revisited. J. Mem. Lang. 86, 97–118 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Jonker, T. R., Seli, P. & MacLeod, C. M. Putting retrieval-induced forgetting in context: an inhibition-free, context-based account. Psychol. Rev. 120, 852–872 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Jonker, T. R., Seli, P. & MacLeod, C. M. Retrieval-induced forgetting and context. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 24, 273–278 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Buchli, D. R., Storm, B. C. & Bjork, R. A. Explaining retrieval-induced forgetting: a change in mental context between the study and restudy practice phases is not sufficient to cause forgetting. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 69, 1197–1209 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Soares, J. S., Polack, C. W. & Miller, R. R. Retrieval-induced versus context-dependent forgetting: does retrieval-induced forgetting depend on context shifts? J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 42, 366–378 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Rupprecht, J. & Bäuml, K.-H. T. Retrieval-induced versus context-induced forgetting: can restudy preceded by context change simulate retrieval-induced forgetting? J. Mem. Lang. 93, 259–275 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Chan, J. C. K., McDermott, K. B. & Roediger, H. L. III Retrieval-induced facilitation: initially nontested material can benefit from prior testing of related material. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 135, 553–571 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Chan, J. C. K. When does retrieval induce facilitation and when does it induce facilitation? Implications for retrieval inhibition, testing effect, and text processing. J. Mem. Lang. 61, 153–170 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Chan, J. C. K. Long-term effects of testing on the recall of nontested materials. Memory 18, 49–57 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Bäuml, K.-H. T. Context retrieval as a critical component in selective memory retrieval. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 28, 177–182 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Howard, M. W. & Kahana, M. J. A distributed representation of temporal context. J. Math. Psychol. 46, 269–299 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Polyn, S. M. & Kahana, M. J. Memory search and the neural representation of context. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12, 24–30 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Bäuml, K.-H. T. & Samenieh, A. Selective memory retrieval can impair and improve retrieval of other memories. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 38, 488–494 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Bäuml, K.-H. T. & Schlichting, A. Memory retrieval as a self-propagating process. Cognition 132, 16–21 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Wallner, L. & Bäuml, K.-H. T. Beneficial effects of selective item repetition on the recall of other items. J. Mem. Lang. 95, 159–172 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Bäuml, K.-H. T., Aslan, A. & Abel, M. The two faces of selective memory retrieval — cognitive, developmental, and social processes. Psychol. Learn. Motiv. 66, 167–209 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Pastötter, B. & Bäuml, K.-H. T. Retrieval practice enhances new learning: the forward effect of testing. Front. Psychol. 5, 286 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Chan, J. C. K., Meissner, C. A. & Davis, S. D. Retrieval potentiates new learning: a theoretical and meta-analytic review. Psychol. Bull. 144, 1111–1146 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Yang, C., Potts, R. & Shanks, D. R. Enhancing learning and retrieval of new information: a review of the forward testing effect. npj Sci. Learn. 3, 8 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Izawa, C. Function of test trials in paired-associate learning. J. Exp. Psychol. 75, 194–209 (1967).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Izawa, C. Optimal potentiating effects and forgetting-prevention effects of tests in paired-associate learning. J. Exp. Psychol. 83, 340–344 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Arnold, K. M. & McDermott, K. B. Test-potentiated learning: distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 39, 940–945 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Kornell, N., Hays, M. J. & Bjork, R. A. Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 35, 989–998 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Richland, L. E., Kornell, N. & Kao, L. S. The pretesting effect: do unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance learning? J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 15, 243–257 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Tulving, E. & Watkins, M. J. On negative transfer: effects of testing one list on the recall of another. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 13, 181–193 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Szpunar, K. K., McDermott, K. B. & Roediger, H. L. Testing during study insulates against the buildup of proactive interference. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 34, 1392–1399 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Pastötter, B., Schicker, S., Niedernhuber, J. & Bäuml, K.-H. T. Retrieval during learning facilitates subsequent memory encoding. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 37, 287–297 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Wissman, K. T., Rawson, K. A. & Pyc, M. A. The interim test effect: testing prior material can facilitate the learning of new material. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 18, 1140–1147 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Szpunar, K. K., Khan, N. Y. & Schacter, D. L. Interpolated memory tests reduce mindwandering and improve learning of online lectures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 6313–6317 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Jing, H. G., Szpunar, K. K. & Schacter, D. L. Interpolated testing influences focused attention and improves integration of information during a video-recorded lecture. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 22, 305–318 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Jang, Y. & Huber, D. E. Context retrieval and context change in free recall: recalling from long-term memory drives list isolation. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 34, 112–127 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Soderstrom, N. C. & Bjork, R. A. Testing facilitates the regulation of subsequent study time. J. Mem. Lang. 73, 99–115 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Cho, K., Neely, J. H., Crocco, S. & Vitrano, D. Testing enhances both encoding and retrieval for both tested and untested items. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 70, 1211–1235 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Chan, J. C. K., Manley, K. D., Davis, S. D. & Szpunar, K. K. Testing potentiates new learning across a retention interval and a lag: a strategy change perspective. J. Mem. Lang. 102, 83–96 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Loftus, E. F. Planting misinformation in the human mind: a 30-year investigation of the malleability of human memory. Learn. Mem. 12, 361–366 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Nemeth, R. J. & Belli, R. F. The influence of schematic knowledge on contradictory vs. additive misinformation: false memory for typical and atypical items. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 20, 563–573 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Huff, M. J. & Umanath, S. Evaluating suggestibility to additive and contradictory misinformation following explicit error detection in younger and older adults. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 24, 180–195 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Putnam, A. L., Sungkhasettee, V. & Roediger, H. L. When misinformation improves memory: the effects of recollecting change. Psychol. Sci. 28, 36–46 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Chan, J. C. K., Thomas, A. K. & Bulevich, J. B. Recalling a witnessed event increases eyewitness suggestibility. Psychol. Sci. 20, 66–73 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Chan, J. C. K. & LaPaglia, J. A. The dark side of testing memory: repeated retrieval can enhance eyewitness suggestibility. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 17, 418–432 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Chan, J. C. K. & LaPaglia, J. A. Impairing existing declarative memories in humans by disrupting reconsolidation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 9309–9313 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. Gordon, L. T. & Thomas, A. K. Testing potentiates new learning in the misinformation paradigm. Mem. Cogn. 42, 186–197 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Gordon, L. T. & Thomas, A. K. The forward effects of testing on eyewitness memory: the tension between suggestibility and learning. J. Mem. Lang. 95, 190–199 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Chan, J. C. K., Manley, K. D. & Lang, K. Retrieval-enhanced suggestibility: a retrospective and a new investigation. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn. 6, 213–229 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Rindal, E. J., DeFranco, R. M., Rich, P. R. & Zaragoza, M. S. Does reactivating a witnessed memory increase its susceptibility to impairment by subsequent misinformation? J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 42, 1544–1558 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Gordon, L. T., Bilolikar, V. K., Hodhod, T. & Thomas, A. K. How prior testing impacts misinformation processing: a dual-task approach. Mem. Cogn. 48, 314–324 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Halamish, V. & Bjork, R. A. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 37, 801–812 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Potts, R. & Shanks, D. R. Can testing immunize memories against interference? J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 38, 1780–1785 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Abel, M. & Roediger, H. L. III Comparing the testing effect under blocked and mixed practice: the mnemonic effects of retrieval practice are not affected by practice format. Mem. Cogn. 45, 81–92 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Pansky, A. & Tenenboim, E. Inoculating against eyewitness suggestibility via interpolated verbatim vs. gist testing. Mem. Cogn. 39, 155–170 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. Gabbert, F., Hope, L., Fisher, R. P. & Jamieson, K. Protecting against misleading post-event information with a self-administered interview. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 26, 568–575 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. Huff, M. J., Davis, S. D. & Meade, M. L. The effects of initial testing on false recall and false recognition in the social contagion of memory paradigm. Mem. Cogn. 41, 820–831 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. Abel, M. & Bäuml, K.-H. T. Social interactions can simultaneously enhance and distort memories: evidence from a collaborative recognition task. Cognition 200, 104254 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Estes, W. K. Statistical theory of spontaneous recovery and regression. Psychol. Rev. 62, 145–154 (1955).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Bower, G.H. in Coding Processes in Human Memory (eds Melton, A. W. & Martin, E.) 85–121 (Wiley, 1972).

  148. Kahana, M. J. Computational models of memory search. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 71, 107–138 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Polyn, S. M., Norman, K. A. & Kahana, M. J. A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall. Psychol. Rev. 116, 129–156 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  150. Lehman, M. & Malmberg, K. J. A buffer model of memory encoding and temporal correlations in retrieval. Psychol. Rev. 120, 155–189 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Lohnas, L. J., Polyn, S. M. & Kahana, M. Expanding the scope of memory search: intralist and interlist effects in free recall. Psychol. Rev. 122, 337–363 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Sederberg, P. B., Howard, M. W. & Kahana, M. J. A context-based theory of recency and contiguity in free recall. Psychol. Rev. 115, 893–912 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  153. Tulving, E. Elements of Episodic Memory (Oxford Univ. Press, 1983).

  154. Melton, A. W. & Irwin, J. M. The influence of degree of interpolated learning on retroactive inhibition and the overt transfer of specific responses. Am. J. Psychol. 53, 173–203 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors contributed equally to all aspects of the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry L. Roediger III.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Psychology thanks Chunliang Yang and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roediger, H.L., Abel, M. The double-edged sword of memory retrieval. Nat Rev Psychol 1, 708–720 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00115-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00115-2

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing