Abstract
Accurately retrieving information from memory boosts later retrieval. However, retrieving memories can also open a window to errors when erroneous information is retrieved or when new information is encoded during retrieval. Similarly, the process of retrieval can influence recall of related information, either inhibiting or facilitating it depending upon the situation. In addition, retrieving or attempting to retrieve information can facilitate encoding of new information, regardless of whether the new information is correct or incorrect. In this Review, we provide selective coverage of the influences of memory retrieval in three distinct arenas: effects on the retrieved information itself, effects on retrieval of related information, and effects on information encoded just after an event is retrieved. Consideration of both positive and negative effects of retrieval in these three domains is critically important to understanding the complexity of retrieval processes and their effects. We discuss episodic context as a conceptual umbrella relevant to all these retrieval effects and note key directions for future research.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$59.00 per year
only $4.92 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Roediger, H. L. in Memory, Consciousness And The Brain: The Tallinn Conference (ed. Tulving, E.) 52–75 (Psychology Press, 2000).
Bluck, S., Alea, N., Habermas, T. & Rubin, D. C. A tale of three functions: the self-reported uses of autobiographical memory. Soc. Cogn. 23, 91–117 (2005).
Raaijmakers, J. G. W. & Shiffrin, R. M. Search of associative memory. Psychol. Rev. 88, 93–134 (1981).
Smith, S. M. & Vela, E. Environmental context-dependent memory: a review and meta-analysis. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 8, 203–220 (2001).
Smith, S. M. & Manzano, I. Video context-dependent recall. Behav. Res. Methods 42, 292–301 (2010).
Shin, Y. S., Masís-Obando, R., Keshavarzian, N., Dáve, R. & Norman, K. A. Context-dependent memory effects in two immersive virtual reality environments: on Mars and underwater. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 28, 574–582 (2021).
Tulving, E. & Thomson, D. M. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychol. Rev. 80, 352–373 (1973).
Carrier, M. & Pashler, H. The influence of retrieval on retention. Mem. Cogn. 20, 633–642 (1992).
Roediger, H. L. & Karpicke, J. D. Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychol. Sci. 17, 249–255 (2006a).
Roediger, H. L. & Karpicke, J. D. The power of testing memory: basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 1, 181–210 (2006b).
Carpenter, S. K. & Kelly, J. W. Tests enhance retention and transfer of spatial learning. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 19, 443–448 (2012).
Schuetze, B. A., Eglington, L. G. & Kang, S. H. K. Retrieval practice benefits memory precision. Memory 27, 1091–1098 (2019).
Wheeler, M. A. & Roediger, H. L. Disparate effects of repeated testing: reconciling Ballard’s (1913) and Bartlett’s (1932) results. Psychol. Sci. 3, 240–245 (1992).
Abel, M. & Roediger, H. L. The testing effect in a social setting: does retrieval practice benefit a listener? J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 24, 347–359 (2018).
Butler, A. C. Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 36, 1118–1133 (2010).
Pan, S. C. & Rickard, T. C. Transfer of test-enhanced learning: meta-analytic review and synthesis. Psychol. Bull. 144, 710–756 (2018).
Wooldridge, C. L., Bugg, J. M., McDaniel, M. A. & Liu, Y. The testing effect with authentic educational materials: a cautionary note. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn. 3, 214–221 (2014).
Tran, R., Rohrer, D. & Pashler, H. Retrieval practice: the lack of transfer to deductive inferences. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 22, 135–140 (2015).
Adesope, O. O., Trevisan, D. A. & Sundararajan, N. Rethinking the use of tests: a meta-analysis of practice testing. Rev. Educ. Res. 87, 659–701 (2017).
Rowland, C. A. The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: a meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychol. Bull. 140, 1432–1463 (2014).
Yang, C., Luo, L., Vadillo, M., Yu, R. & Shanks, D. R. Testing (quizzing) boosts classroom learning: a systematic and meta-analytic review. Psychol. Bull. 147, 399–435 (2021).
McDermott, K. B. Practicing retrieval facilitates learning. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 72, 609–633 (2021).
Schwieren, J., Barenberg, J. & Dutke, S. The testing effect in the psychology classroom: a meta-analytic perspective. Psychol. Learn. Teach. 16, 179–196 (2017).
Agarwal, P. K., Nunes, L. D. & Blunt, J. R. Retrieval practice consistently benefits student learning: a systematic review of applied research in schools and classrooms. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 33, 1409–1453 (2021).
Uner, O., Tekin, E. & Roediger, H. L. True–false tests enhance retention relative to rereading. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 28, 114–129 (2022).
Pyc, M. A. & Rawson, K. A. Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: does greater difficulty correctly recalling information learn to higher levels of memory? J. Mem. Lang. 60, 437–447 (2009).
Landauer, T. K. & Bjork, R. A. in Practical Aspects Of Memory (eds Gruneberg, M. M., Morris, P. E. & Sykes, R. N.) 625–632 (Academic, 1978).
Karpicke, J. D. & Bauernschmidt, A. Spaced retrieval: absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 37, 1250–1257 (2011).
Karpicke, J. D. & Roediger, H. L. Is expanding retrieval a superior method for learning text materials? Mem. Cogn. 38, 116–124 (2010).
Roediger, H. L. & Karpicke, J. D. in Successful Remembering And Successful Forgetting: Essays In Honor Of Robert A. Bjork (ed. Benjamin, A. S.) 23–48 (Psychology Press, 2011).
Kang, S. H. K., Lindsey, R. V., Mozer, M. C. & Pashler, H. Retrieval practice over the long term: should spacing be expanding or equal-interval? Psychon. Bull. Rev. 21, 1544–1550 (2014).
Lindsey, R. V., Shroyer, J. D., Pashler, H. & Mozer, M. C. Improving students’ long-term knowledge retention through personalized review. Psychol. Sci. 25, 639–647 (2014).
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D. & Franks, J. J. Levels of processing versus transfer-appropriate processing. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 16, 519–533 (1977).
Bjork, R. A. in Information Processing And Cognition: The Loyola Symposium (ed. Solso, R. L.) 123–144 (Lawrence Erlbaum, 1975).
Carpenter, S. K. Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 35, 1563–1569 (2009).
Carpenter, S. K. Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention. Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 37, 1547–1552 (2011).
Carpenter, S. K. & Yeung, K. L. The role of mediator strength in learning from retrieval. J. Mem. Lang. 92, 128–141 (2017).
Pyc, M. A. & Rawson, K. A. Why testing improves memory: mediator effectiveness hypothesis. Science 330, 335 (2010).
Zaromb, F. M. & Roediger, H. L. III The testing effect in free recall is associated with enhanced organizational processes. Mem. Cogn. 38, 995–1008 (2010).
Congleton, A. & Rajaram, S. The origin of the interaction between learning method and delay in the testing effect: the roles of processing and conceptual retrieval organization. Mem. Cogn. 40, 528–539 (2012).
Lehman, M., Smith, M. A. & Karpicke, J. D. Toward an episodic context account of retrieval-based learning: dissociating retrieval practice and elaboration. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 40, 1787–1794 (2014).
Whiffen, J. & Karpicke, J. D. The role of episodic context in retrieval practice effects. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 43, 1036–1046 (2017).
Akan, M., Stanley, S. E. & Benjamin, A. S. Testing enhances memory for context. J. Mem. Lang. 103, 19–27 (2018).
Hong, M. K., Polyn, S. M. & Fazio, L. K. Examining the episodic context account: does retrieval practice enhance memory for context? Cogn. Res. Princip. Impl. 4, 46 (2019).
McDermott, K. B. The persistence of false memories in list recall. J. Mem. Lang. 35, 212–230 (1996).
Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G. & Burns, H. J. Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Learn. Mem. 4, 19–31 (1978).
Roediger, H. L., Jacoby, D. & McDermott, K. B. Misinformation effects in recall: creating false memories through repeated retrieval. J. Mem. Lang. 35, 300–318 (1996).
Alberini, C. M. & LeDoux, J. E. Memory reconsolidation. Curr. Biol. 17, R746–R750 (2013).
Agren, T. Human reconsolidation: a reactivation and update. Brain Res. Bull. 105, 70–82 (2014).
Lee, J. L. C., Nader, K. & Schiller, D. An update on memory reconsolidation updating. Trends Cogn. Sci. 21, 531–545 (2017).
Elsey, J. W. B., Van Ast, V. & Kindt, M. Human memory reconsolidation: a guiding framework and critical review of the evidence. Psychol. Bull. 144, 797–848 (2018).
Nader, K., Schafe, G. E. & LeDoux, J. E. Fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval. Nature 406, 722–726 (2000).
Nader, K., Schafe, G. E. & LeDoux, J. E. The labile nature of consolidation theory. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 1, 216–219 (2000).
Wichert, S., Wolf, O. T. & Schwabe, L. Reactivation, interference, and reconsolidation: are recent and remote memories likewise susceptible? Behav. Neurosci. 125, 699–704 (2011).
Wichert, S., Wolf, O. T. & Schwabe, L. Updating of episodic memories depends on the strength of new learning after memory reactivation. Behav. Neurosci. 127, 331–338 (2013).
Walker, M. P., Brakefield, T., Hobson, J. A. & Stickgold, R. Dissociable stages of human memory consolidation and reconsolidation. Nature 425, 616–620 (2003).
Hupbach, A., Gomez, R., Hardt, O. & Nadel, L. Reconsolidation of episodic memories: a subtle reminder triggers integration of new information. Learn. Mem. 14, 47–53 (2007).
Scully, I. D., Napper, L. E. & Hupbach, A. Does reactivation trigger episodic memory change? A meta-analysis. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 142, 99–107 (2017).
Scully, I. D. & Hupbach, A. Different reactivation procedures enable or prevent episodic memory updating. Hippocampus 30, 806–814 (2019).
Hardwicke, T. E., Taqi, M. & Shanks, D. R. Postretrieval new learning does not reliably induce human memory updating via reconsolidation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 5206–5211 (2016).
Van Schie, K., van Veen, S. C., van den Hout, M. A. & Engelhard, I. M. Modification of episodic memories by novel retrieval: a failed replication study. Eur. J. Psychotraumatol. 8 (suppl. 1), 1315291 (2017).
Sederberg, P. B., Gershman, S. J., Polyn, S. M. & Norman, K. A. Human memory reconsolidation can be explained using the temporal context model. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 18, 455–468 (2011).
Gershman, S. J., Schapiro, A. C., Hupbach, A. & Norman, K. A. Neural context reinstatement predicts memory misattribution. J. Neurosci. 33, 8590–8695 (2013).
Klingmüller, A., Caplan, J. B. & Sommer, T. Intrusions in episodic memory: reconsolidation or interference? Learn. Mem. 24, 216–224 (2017).
Dudai, Y. The restless engram: consolidations never end. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 35, 227–247 (2012).
McDermott, K. B. Paradoxical effects of testing: repeated retrieval attempts enhance the likelihood of later accurate and false recall. Mem. Cogn. 34, 261–267 (2006).
Deese, J. On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. J. Exp. Psychol. 58, 17–22 (1959).
Roediger, H. L. & McDermott, K. B. Creating false memories: remembering words not presented in lists. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 21, 803–814 (1995).
Brown, J. Reciprocal facilitation and impairment in free recall. Psychon. Sci. 10, 41–42 (1968).
Roediger, H. L. III Recall as a self-limiting process. Mem. Cogn. 6, 54–63 (1978).
Tulving, E. & Arbuckle, T. Y. Sources of intratrial interference in paired-associate learning. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 1, 321–334 (1963).
Smith, A. D. Output interference and organized recall from long-term memory. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 10, 400–408 (1971).
Roediger, H. L. III & Schmidt, S. R. Output interference in the recall of categorized and paired-associate lists. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Learn. Mem. 6, 91–105 (1980).
Bäuml, K.-H. T. & Samenieh, A. The two faces of selective memory retrieval. Psychol. Sci. 21, 793–795 (2010).
Aue, W. R., Criss, A. H. & Prince, M. A. Dynamic memory searches: selective output interference for the memory of facts. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 22, 1798–1806 (2015).
Roediger, H. L. III Inhibition in recall from cueing with recall targets. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 12, 644–657 (1973).
Rundus, D. Negative effects of using list items as recall cues. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 12, 43–50 (1973).
Norman, D. A. & Waugh, N. C. Stimulus and response interference in recognition-memory experiments. J. Exp. Psychol. 78, 551–559 (1968).
Criss, A. H., Malmberg, K. J. & Shiffrin, R. M. Output interference in recognition memory. J. Mem. Lang. 64, 316–326 (2011).
Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A. & Bjork, E. L. Remembering can cause forgetting: retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 20, 1063–1087 (1994).
Anderson, M. C. Rethinking interference theory: executive control and the mechanism of forgetting. J. Mem. Lang. 49, 415–445 (2003).
Murayama, K., Miyatsu, T., Buchli, D. & Storm, B. C. Forgetting as a consequence of retrieval: a meta-analytic review of retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychol. Bull. 140, 1383–1409 (2014).
Ciranni, M. A. & Shimamura, A. P. Retrieval-induced forgetting in episodic memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 25, 1403–1414 (1999).
Barnier, A., Hung, L. & Conway, M. Retrieval-induced forgetting of emotional and unemotional autobiographical memories. Cogn. Emot. 18, 457–477 (2004).
Shaw, J. S., Bjork, R. A. & Handal, A. Retrieval-induced forgetting in an eyewitness-memory paradigm. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2, 249–253 (1995).
Cuc, A., Koppel, J. & Hirst, W. Silence is not golden: a case for socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychol. Sci. 18, 727–733 (2007).
Abel, M. & Bäuml, K.-H. T. Retrieval-induced forgetting in a social context: do the same mechanisms underlie forgetting in speakers and listeners? Mem. Cogn. 48, 1–15 (2020).
Cinel, C., Cortis Mack, C. & Ward, G. Towards augmented human memory: retrieval-induced forgetting and retrieval practice in an interactive, end-of-day review. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 147, 632–661 (2018).
Anderson, M. C. & Spellman, B. A. On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: memory retrieval as a model case. Psychol. Rev. 102, 68–100 (1995).
Raaijmakers, J. G. W. & Jakab, E. Rethinking inhibition theory: on the problematic status of the inhibition theory for forgetting. J. Mem. Lang. 68, 98–122 (2013).
Verde, M. F. Retrieval-induced forgetting in recall: competitor interference revisited. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 39, 1433–1448 (2013).
Schilling, C. J., Storm, B. C. & Anderson, M. C. Examining the costs and benefits of inhibition in memory retrieval. Cognition 133, 358–370 (2014).
Rupprecht, J. & Bäuml, K.-H. T. Retrieval-induced forgetting in item recognition: retrieval specificity revisited. J. Mem. Lang. 86, 97–118 (2016).
Jonker, T. R., Seli, P. & MacLeod, C. M. Putting retrieval-induced forgetting in context: an inhibition-free, context-based account. Psychol. Rev. 120, 852–872 (2013).
Jonker, T. R., Seli, P. & MacLeod, C. M. Retrieval-induced forgetting and context. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 24, 273–278 (2015).
Buchli, D. R., Storm, B. C. & Bjork, R. A. Explaining retrieval-induced forgetting: a change in mental context between the study and restudy practice phases is not sufficient to cause forgetting. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 69, 1197–1209 (2016).
Soares, J. S., Polack, C. W. & Miller, R. R. Retrieval-induced versus context-dependent forgetting: does retrieval-induced forgetting depend on context shifts? J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 42, 366–378 (2016).
Rupprecht, J. & Bäuml, K.-H. T. Retrieval-induced versus context-induced forgetting: can restudy preceded by context change simulate retrieval-induced forgetting? J. Mem. Lang. 93, 259–275 (2017).
Chan, J. C. K., McDermott, K. B. & Roediger, H. L. III Retrieval-induced facilitation: initially nontested material can benefit from prior testing of related material. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 135, 553–571 (2006).
Chan, J. C. K. When does retrieval induce facilitation and when does it induce facilitation? Implications for retrieval inhibition, testing effect, and text processing. J. Mem. Lang. 61, 153–170 (2009).
Chan, J. C. K. Long-term effects of testing on the recall of nontested materials. Memory 18, 49–57 (2010).
Bäuml, K.-H. T. Context retrieval as a critical component in selective memory retrieval. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 28, 177–182 (2019).
Howard, M. W. & Kahana, M. J. A distributed representation of temporal context. J. Math. Psychol. 46, 269–299 (2002).
Polyn, S. M. & Kahana, M. J. Memory search and the neural representation of context. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12, 24–30 (2008).
Bäuml, K.-H. T. & Samenieh, A. Selective memory retrieval can impair and improve retrieval of other memories. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 38, 488–494 (2012).
Bäuml, K.-H. T. & Schlichting, A. Memory retrieval as a self-propagating process. Cognition 132, 16–21 (2014).
Wallner, L. & Bäuml, K.-H. T. Beneficial effects of selective item repetition on the recall of other items. J. Mem. Lang. 95, 159–172 (2017).
Bäuml, K.-H. T., Aslan, A. & Abel, M. The two faces of selective memory retrieval — cognitive, developmental, and social processes. Psychol. Learn. Motiv. 66, 167–209 (2017).
Pastötter, B. & Bäuml, K.-H. T. Retrieval practice enhances new learning: the forward effect of testing. Front. Psychol. 5, 286 (2014).
Chan, J. C. K., Meissner, C. A. & Davis, S. D. Retrieval potentiates new learning: a theoretical and meta-analytic review. Psychol. Bull. 144, 1111–1146 (2018).
Yang, C., Potts, R. & Shanks, D. R. Enhancing learning and retrieval of new information: a review of the forward testing effect. npj Sci. Learn. 3, 8 (2018).
Izawa, C. Function of test trials in paired-associate learning. J. Exp. Psychol. 75, 194–209 (1967).
Izawa, C. Optimal potentiating effects and forgetting-prevention effects of tests in paired-associate learning. J. Exp. Psychol. 83, 340–344 (1970).
Arnold, K. M. & McDermott, K. B. Test-potentiated learning: distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 39, 940–945 (2013).
Kornell, N., Hays, M. J. & Bjork, R. A. Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 35, 989–998 (2009).
Richland, L. E., Kornell, N. & Kao, L. S. The pretesting effect: do unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance learning? J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 15, 243–257 (2009).
Tulving, E. & Watkins, M. J. On negative transfer: effects of testing one list on the recall of another. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 13, 181–193 (1974).
Szpunar, K. K., McDermott, K. B. & Roediger, H. L. Testing during study insulates against the buildup of proactive interference. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 34, 1392–1399 (2008).
Pastötter, B., Schicker, S., Niedernhuber, J. & Bäuml, K.-H. T. Retrieval during learning facilitates subsequent memory encoding. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 37, 287–297 (2011).
Wissman, K. T., Rawson, K. A. & Pyc, M. A. The interim test effect: testing prior material can facilitate the learning of new material. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 18, 1140–1147 (2011).
Szpunar, K. K., Khan, N. Y. & Schacter, D. L. Interpolated memory tests reduce mindwandering and improve learning of online lectures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 6313–6317 (2013).
Jing, H. G., Szpunar, K. K. & Schacter, D. L. Interpolated testing influences focused attention and improves integration of information during a video-recorded lecture. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 22, 305–318 (2016).
Jang, Y. & Huber, D. E. Context retrieval and context change in free recall: recalling from long-term memory drives list isolation. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 34, 112–127 (2008).
Soderstrom, N. C. & Bjork, R. A. Testing facilitates the regulation of subsequent study time. J. Mem. Lang. 73, 99–115 (2014).
Cho, K., Neely, J. H., Crocco, S. & Vitrano, D. Testing enhances both encoding and retrieval for both tested and untested items. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 70, 1211–1235 (2017).
Chan, J. C. K., Manley, K. D., Davis, S. D. & Szpunar, K. K. Testing potentiates new learning across a retention interval and a lag: a strategy change perspective. J. Mem. Lang. 102, 83–96 (2018).
Loftus, E. F. Planting misinformation in the human mind: a 30-year investigation of the malleability of human memory. Learn. Mem. 12, 361–366 (2005).
Nemeth, R. J. & Belli, R. F. The influence of schematic knowledge on contradictory vs. additive misinformation: false memory for typical and atypical items. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 20, 563–573 (2006).
Huff, M. J. & Umanath, S. Evaluating suggestibility to additive and contradictory misinformation following explicit error detection in younger and older adults. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 24, 180–195 (2018).
Putnam, A. L., Sungkhasettee, V. & Roediger, H. L. When misinformation improves memory: the effects of recollecting change. Psychol. Sci. 28, 36–46 (2017).
Chan, J. C. K., Thomas, A. K. & Bulevich, J. B. Recalling a witnessed event increases eyewitness suggestibility. Psychol. Sci. 20, 66–73 (2009).
Chan, J. C. K. & LaPaglia, J. A. The dark side of testing memory: repeated retrieval can enhance eyewitness suggestibility. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 17, 418–432 (2011).
Chan, J. C. K. & LaPaglia, J. A. Impairing existing declarative memories in humans by disrupting reconsolidation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 9309–9313 (2013).
Gordon, L. T. & Thomas, A. K. Testing potentiates new learning in the misinformation paradigm. Mem. Cogn. 42, 186–197 (2014).
Gordon, L. T. & Thomas, A. K. The forward effects of testing on eyewitness memory: the tension between suggestibility and learning. J. Mem. Lang. 95, 190–199 (2017).
Chan, J. C. K., Manley, K. D. & Lang, K. Retrieval-enhanced suggestibility: a retrospective and a new investigation. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn. 6, 213–229 (2017).
Rindal, E. J., DeFranco, R. M., Rich, P. R. & Zaragoza, M. S. Does reactivating a witnessed memory increase its susceptibility to impairment by subsequent misinformation? J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 42, 1544–1558 (2016).
Gordon, L. T., Bilolikar, V. K., Hodhod, T. & Thomas, A. K. How prior testing impacts misinformation processing: a dual-task approach. Mem. Cogn. 48, 314–324 (2020).
Halamish, V. & Bjork, R. A. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 37, 801–812 (2011).
Potts, R. & Shanks, D. R. Can testing immunize memories against interference? J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 38, 1780–1785 (2012).
Abel, M. & Roediger, H. L. III Comparing the testing effect under blocked and mixed practice: the mnemonic effects of retrieval practice are not affected by practice format. Mem. Cogn. 45, 81–92 (2017).
Pansky, A. & Tenenboim, E. Inoculating against eyewitness suggestibility via interpolated verbatim vs. gist testing. Mem. Cogn. 39, 155–170 (2011).
Gabbert, F., Hope, L., Fisher, R. P. & Jamieson, K. Protecting against misleading post-event information with a self-administered interview. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 26, 568–575 (2012).
Huff, M. J., Davis, S. D. & Meade, M. L. The effects of initial testing on false recall and false recognition in the social contagion of memory paradigm. Mem. Cogn. 41, 820–831 (2013).
Abel, M. & Bäuml, K.-H. T. Social interactions can simultaneously enhance and distort memories: evidence from a collaborative recognition task. Cognition 200, 104254 (2020).
Estes, W. K. Statistical theory of spontaneous recovery and regression. Psychol. Rev. 62, 145–154 (1955).
Bower, G.H. in Coding Processes in Human Memory (eds Melton, A. W. & Martin, E.) 85–121 (Wiley, 1972).
Kahana, M. J. Computational models of memory search. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 71, 107–138 (2020).
Polyn, S. M., Norman, K. A. & Kahana, M. J. A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall. Psychol. Rev. 116, 129–156 (2009).
Lehman, M. & Malmberg, K. J. A buffer model of memory encoding and temporal correlations in retrieval. Psychol. Rev. 120, 155–189 (2013).
Lohnas, L. J., Polyn, S. M. & Kahana, M. Expanding the scope of memory search: intralist and interlist effects in free recall. Psychol. Rev. 122, 337–363 (2015).
Sederberg, P. B., Howard, M. W. & Kahana, M. J. A context-based theory of recency and contiguity in free recall. Psychol. Rev. 115, 893–912 (2008).
Tulving, E. Elements of Episodic Memory (Oxford Univ. Press, 1983).
Melton, A. W. & Irwin, J. M. The influence of degree of interpolated learning on retroactive inhibition and the overt transfer of specific responses. Am. J. Psychol. 53, 173–203 (1968).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors contributed equally to all aspects of the article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Psychology thanks Chunliang Yang and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Roediger, H.L., Abel, M. The double-edged sword of memory retrieval. Nat Rev Psychol 1, 708–720 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00115-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00115-2
This article is cited by
-
Connecting spatial thinking to STEM learning through visualizations
Nature Reviews Psychology (2023)