Responding to wrongdoing is a core feature of our social lives. Indeed, a central assumption of modern institutional justice systems is that transgressors should be punished. In this Review, we synthesize the developmental literature on third-party intervention to provide insight into the types of responses to transgressions that are privileged early in ontogeny. In particular, we focus on young children as both assessors and agents of third-party punishment. With respect to assessment, children have rich expectations about the pursuit of punishment and evaluate those who punish transgressors positively. With respect to agency, children punish wrongdoing even when doing so is costly, and their motives to do so are tethered to a variety of concerns (such as retribution and restoration). Our Review suggests that key concepts in modern institutional justice systems are apparent in early child development, and that third-party punishment is a signature of children’s sophisticated toolkit for regulating social relationships and behaviour.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to the entire Nature family of 50+ journals
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $4.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. Third-party punishment and social norms. Evol. Hum. Behav. 25, 63–87 (2004).
Raihani, N. J., Thornton, A. & Bshary, R. Punishment and cooperation in nature. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 288–295 (2012).
Vidmar, N. & Miller, D. T. Social psychological processes underlying attitudes toward legal punishment. Law Soc. Rev. 14, 565–602 (1980).
Henrich, J. et al. Costly punishment across human societies. Science 312, 1767–1770 (2006).
Balliet, D., Mulder, L. B. & Van Lange, P. A. Reward, punishment, and cooperation: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 137, 594–615 (2011).
Boyd, R., Gintis, H. & Bowles, S. Coordinated punishment of defectors sustains cooperation and can proliferate when rare. Science 328, 617–620 (2010).
Carpenter, J. & Matthews, P. H. What norms trigger punishment? Exp. Econ. 1, 272–288 (2009).
Cushman, F. Punishment in humans: from intuitions to institutions. Phil. Compass 10, 117–133 (2015).
Gächter, S., Renner, E. & Sefton, M. The long-run benefits of punishment. Science 322, 1510–1510 (2008).
Yamagishi, T. The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51, 110–116 (1986).
Henrich, J. & Muthukrishna, M. The origins and psychology of human cooperation. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 72, 207–240 (2021).
Hofmann, W., Brandt, M. J., Wisneski, D. C., Rockenbach, B. & Skitka, L. J. Moral punishment in everyday life. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B 44, 1697–1711 (2018).
Molho, C., Tybur, J. M., Van Lange, P. A. & Balliet, D. Direct and indirect punishment of norm violations in daily life. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–9 (2020).
Heffner, J. & FeldmanHall, O. Why we don’t always punish: preferences for non-punitive responses to moral violations. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–13 (2019).
Martin, J. W. & Cushman, F. To punish or to leave: distinct cognitive processes underlie partner control and partner choice behaviors. PLoS ONE 10, e0125193 (2015).
McCullough, M. E. Forgiveness: who does it and how do they do it? Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 10, 194–197 (2001).
Theunissen, M. H., Vogels, A. G. & Reijneveld, S. A. Punishment and reward in parental discipline for children aged 5 to 6 years: prevalence and groups at risk. Acad. Pediatr. 15, 96–102 (2015).
Johnstone, G. in Restorative Justice: Ideas, Values, Debates (Routledge, 2013).
Marshall, T. F. in Restorative Justice: An Overview (Home Office, 1999).
Van Ness, D. & Strong, K. H. in Restoring Justice: An Introduction to Restorative Justice (Routledge, 2014).
Wiessner, P. The role of third parties in norm enforcement in customary courts among the Enga of Papua New Guinea. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 32320–32328 (2020).
Baillargeon, R. Innate ideas revisited: for a principle of persistence in infants’ physical reasoning. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 3, 2–13 (2008).
Sim, Z. L. & Xu, F. Infants preferentially approach and explore the unexpected. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 35, 596–608 (2017).
Kanakogi, Y. et al. Preverbal infants affirm third-party interventions that protect victims from aggressors. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 1–7 (2017).
Meristo, M. & Surian, L. Do infants detect indirect reciprocity? Cognition 129, 102–113 (2013).
DesChamps, T. D., Eason, A. E. & Sommerville, J. A. Infants associate praise and admonishment with fair and unfair individuals. Infancy 21, 478–504 (2016).
Geraci, A. & Surian, L. Toddlers’ expectations of third‐party punishments and rewards following an act of aggression. Aggress. Behav. 47, 521–529 (2021).
Geraci, A. Toddlers’ expectations of corporal third-party punishments against the non-defender puppet. J. Exp. Child. Psychol. 210, 105199 (2021).
Fu, T., Ji, Y., Kamei, K. & Putterman, L. Punishment can support cooperation even when punishable. Econ. Lett. 154, 84–87 (2017).
Henrich, J. & Boyd, R. Why people punish defectors: weak conformist transmission can stabilize costly enforcement of norms in cooperative dilemmas. J. Theor. Biol. 208, 79–89 (2001).
Kiyonari, T. & Barclay, P. Cooperation in social dilemmas: free riding may be thwarted by second-order reward rather than by punishment. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 95, 826–842 (2008).
Martin, J. W., Jordan, J. J., Rand, D. G. & Cushman, F. When do we punish people who don’t? Cognition 193, 104040 (2019).
Ting, F., He, Z. & Baillargeon, R. Toddlers and infants expect individuals to refrain from helping an ingroup victim’s aggressor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 6025–6034 (2019).
Stavans, M. & Baillargeon, R. Infants expect leaders to right wrongs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 16292–16301 (2019).
Marshall, J., Mermin-Bunnell, K. & Bloom, P. Developing judgments about peers’ obligation to intervene. Cognition 201, 104215 (2020).
Piaget, J. The Moral Judgment of the Child (Routledge, 2013).
Kohlberg, L. & Kramer, R. Continuities and discontinuities in childhood and adult moral development. Hum. Dev. 12, 93–120 (1969).
Barchard, K. & Atkins, C. Children’s decisions about naughtiness and punishment: dominance of expiatory punishments. J. Res. Child. Educ. 5, 109–115 (1991).
Cushman, F., Sheketoff, R., Wharton, S. & Carey, S. The development of intent-based moral judgment. Cognition 127, 6–21 (2013).
Killen, M., Mulvey, K. L., Richardson, C., Jampol, N. & Woodward, A. The accidental transgressor: morally-relevant theory of mind. Cognition 119, 197–215 (2011).
Van de Vondervoort, J. W. & Hamlin, J. K. Preschoolers’ social and moral judgments of third-party helpers and hinderers align with infants’ social evaluations. J. Exp. Child. Psychol. 164, 136–151 (2017).
Smetana, J. G. Preschool children’s conceptions of moral and social rules. Child. Dev. 52, 1333–1336 (1981).
Smith, C. E. & Warneken, F. Children’s reasoning about distributive and retributive justice across development. Dev. Psychol. 52, 613–628 (2016).
Kenward, B. & Östh, T. Enactment of third-party punishment by 4-year-olds. Front. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00373 (2012).
Loke, I. C., Heyman, G. D., Forgie, J., McCarthy, A. & Lee, K. Children’s moral evaluations of reporting the transgressions of peers: age differences in evaluations of tattling. Dev. Psychol. 47, 1757–1762 (2011).
Loke, I., Heyman, G. D., Itakura, S., Toriyama, R. & Lee, K. Japanese and American children’s moral evaluations of reporting on transgressions. Dev. Psychol. 50, 1520–1531 (2014).
Vaish, A., Herrmann, E., Markmann, C. & Tomasello, M. Preschoolers value those who sanction non-cooperators. Cognition 153, 43–51 (2016).
Vittrup, B. & Holden, G. W. Children’s assessments of corporal punishment and other disciplinary practices: the role of age, race, SES, and exposure to spanking. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 31, 211–220 (2010).
Catron, T. F. & Masters, J. C. Mothers’ and children’s conceptualizations of corporal punishment. Child. Dev. 64, 1815–1828 (1993).
Bregant, J., Shaw, A. & Kinzler, K. D. Intuitive jurisprudence: early reasoning about the functions of punishment. J. Empir. Legal Stud. 13, 693–717 (2016).
Dhaliwal, N. A., Patil, I. & Cushman, F. Reputational and cooperative benefits of third-party compensation. Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec. 164, 27–51 (2021).
Lee, Y. E. & Warneken, F. Children’s evaluations of third-party responses to unfairness: children prefer helping over punishment. Cognition 205, 104374 (2020).
Liu, X., Yang, X. & Wu, Z. To punish or to restore: how children evaluate victims’ responses to immorality. Front. Psychol. 12, 696160 (2021).
Gross, J., Méder, Z. Z., Okamoto-Barth, S. & Riedl, A. Building the Leviathan — voluntary centralisation of punishment power sustains cooperation in humans. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–9 (2016).
Hilbe, C., Traulsen, A., Röhl, T. & Milinski, M. Democratic decisions establish stable authorities that overcome the paradox of second-order punishment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 752–756 (2014).
Pfattheicher, S., Boehm, R. & Kesberg, R. The advantage of democratic peer punishment in sustaining cooperation within groups. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 31, 562–571 (2018).
Schmidt, M. F. & Tomasello, M. Young children enforce social norms. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 21, 232–236 (2012).
Schmidt, M. F., Rakoczy, H. & Tomasello, M. Young children enforce social norms selectively depending on the violator’s group affiliation. Cognition 124, 325–333 (2012).
Heyman, G. D., Loke, I. C. & Lee, K. Children spontaneously police adults’ transgressions. J. Exp. Child. Psychol. 150, 155–164 (2016).
Vaish, A., Missana, M. & Tomasello, M. Three‐year‐old children intervene in third‐party moral transgressions. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 29, 124–130 (2011).
Rossano, F., Rakoczy, H. & Tomasello, M. Young children’s understanding of violations of property rights. Cognition 121, 219–227 (2011).
Josephs, M., Kushnir, T., Gräfenhain, M. & Rakoczy, H. Children protest moral and conventional violations more when they believe actions are freely chosen. J. Exp. Child. Psychol. 141, 247–255 (2016).
Friedrich, J. P. & Schmidt, M. F. Preschoolers agree to and enforce prosocial, but not selfish, sharing norms. J. Exp. Child. Psychol. 214, 105303 (2022).
Kanngiesser, P. et al. Children across societies enforce conventional norms but in culturally variable ways. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2112521118 (2022).
Misch, A., Over, H. & Carpenter, M. The whistleblower’s dilemma in young children: when loyalty trumps other moral concerns. Front. Psychol. 9, 250 (2018).
Ingram, G. P. & Bering, J. M. Children’s tattling: the reporting of everyday norm violations in preschool settings. Child. Dev. 81, 945–957 (2010).
Yucel, M. & Vaish, A. Young children tattle to enforce moral norms. Soc. Dev. 27, 924–936 (2018).
McAuliffe, K., Jordan, J. J. & Warneken, F. Costly third-party punishment in young children. Cognition 134, 1–10 (2015).
Yudkin, D. A., Van Bavel, J. J. & Rhodes, M. Young children police group members at personal cost. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 149, 182–191 (2020).
Kenward, B. & Östh, T. Five‐year‐olds punish antisocial adults. Aggress. Behav. 41, 413–420 (2015).
Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., Bloom, P. & Mahajan, N. How infants and toddlers react to antisocial others. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 19931–19936 (2011).
Riedl, K., Jensen, K., Call, J. & Tomasello, M. Restorative justice in children. Curr. Biol. 25, 1731–1735 (2015).
Yang, F., Choi, Y. J., Misch, A., Yang, X. & Dunham, Y. In defense of the commons: young children negatively evaluate and sanction free riders. Psychol. Sci. 29, 1598–1611 (2018).
Arini, R., Wiggs, L. & Kenward, B. Moral duty and equalization concerns motivate children’s third-party punishment. Dev. Sci. 57, 1325–1341 (2021).
McAuliffe, K., Blake, P. R., Steinbeis, N. & Warneken, F. The developmental foundations of human fairness. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 1–9 (2017).
Ziv, T., Whiteman, J. D. & Sommerville, J. A. Toddlers’ interventions toward fair and unfair individuals. Cognition 214, 104781 (2021).
Lee, Y. & Warneken, F. Does third-party punishment in children aim at equality? Dev. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001331 (2022).
Salali, G. D., Juda, M. & Henrich, J. Transmission and development of costly punishment in children. Evol. Hum. Behav. 36, 86–94 (2015).
Nielsen, M., Haun, D., Kärtner, J. & Legare, C. H. The persistent sampling bias in developmental psychology: a call to action. J. Exp. Child. Psychol. 162, 31–38 (2017).
House, B. R. et al. Social norms and cultural diversity in the development of third-party punishment. Proc. R. Soc. B 287, 20192794 (2020).
Michael, M. A. Utilitarianism and retributivism: what’s the difference? Am. Phil. Quart. 29, 173–182 (1992).
Amarasekara, K. & Bagaric, M. The errors of retributivism. Melb. Univ. Law Rev. 24, 124–189 (2000).
Bentham, J. in What is Justice? Classic and Contemporary Readings (eds Soloman, R. C. & Murphy, M. C.) 215–220 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2000).
Christopher, R. L. Deterring retributivism: the injustice of just punishment. Northwest. Univ. Law Rev. 96, 843 (2001).
Kant, I. in Why Punish? How Much? A Reader on Punishment (ed. Tonry, M. H.) 31–36 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2011).
Berman, M. N. Rehabilitating retributivism. Law. Phil. 32, 83–10 (2013).
Kershnar, S. A defense of retributivism. Int. J. Appl. Phil. 14, 97–117 (2000).
Moore, M. S. Justifying retributivism. Isr. Law Rev. 27, 15–49 (1993).
Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M. & Robinson, P. H. Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 83, 284–299 (2002).
Crockett, M. J., Özdemir, Y. & Fehr, E. The value of vengeance and the demand for deterrence. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 143, 2279–2286 (2014).
Goodwin, G. P. & Gromet, D. M. Punishment. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci. 5, 561–572 (2014).
Keller, L. B., Oswald, M. E., Stucki, I. & Gollwitzer, M. A closer look at an eye for an eye: laypersons’ punishment decisions are primarily driven by retributive motives. Soc. Justice Res. 23, 99–116 (2010).
Nadelhoffer, T., Heshmati, S., Kaplan, D. & Nichols, S. Folk retributivism and the communication confound. Econ. Phil. 29, 235–261 (2013).
Nikiforakis, N. & Normann, H. T. A comparative statics analysis of punishment in public-good experiments. Exp. Econ. 11, 358–369 (2008).
Ouss, A. & Peysakhovich, A. When punishment doesn’t pay: cold glow and decisions to punish. J. Law Econ. 58, 625–655 (2015).
Marshall, J., Yudkin, D. A. & Crockett, M. J. Children punish third parties to satisfy both consequentialist and retributive motives. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 361–368 (2021).
Twardawski, M. & Hilbig, B. E. The motivational basis of third-party punishment in children. PLoS One 15, e0241919 (2020).
Martin, J. W., Martin, S. & McAuliffe, K. Third-party punishment promotes fairness in children. Dev. Psychol. 57, 927–939 (2021).
Lergetporer, P., Angerer, S., Glätzle-Rützler, D. & Sutter, M. Third-party punishment increases cooperation in children through (misaligned) expectations and conditional cooperation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 6916–6921 (2014).
Van de Vondervoort, J. W. & Hamlin, J. K. Young children remedy second-and third-party ownership violations. Trends Cogn. Sci. 19, 490–491 (2015).
Yang, X., Wu, Z. & Dunham, Y. Children’s restorative justice in an intergroup context. Soc. Dev. 30, 663–683 (2021).
McAuliffe, K. & Dunham, Y. Children favor punishment over restoration. Dev. Sci. 24, e13093 (2021).
Caruso, G. D. Rejecting Retributivism: Free Will, Punishment, and Criminal Justice (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. & Norenzayan, A. The weirdest people in the world? Behav. Brain Sci. 33, 61–83 (2010).
Yucel, M., Drell, M. B., Jaswal, V. K. & Vaish, A. Young children do not perceive distributional fairness as a moral norm. Dev. Psychol. (in the press).
Dunlea, J. P. & Heiphetz, L. Children’s and adults’ understanding of punishment and the criminal justice system. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 87, 103913 (2020).
Dunlea, J. P. & Heiphetz, L. Children’s and adults’ views of punishment as a path to redemption. Child. Dev. 92, e393–e415 (2021).
Dunlea, J. P. & Heiphetz, L. Moral psychology as a necessary bridge between social cognition and law. Soc. Cogn. 39, 183–199 (2021).
Marshall, J., Gollwitzer, A., Wynn, K. & Bloom, P. The development of corporal third-party punishment. Cognition 190, 221–229 (2019).
Pedersen, E. J., McAuliffe, W. H. & McCullough, M. E. The unresponsive avenger: more evidence that disinterested third parties do not punish altruistically. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 147, 514–544 (2018).
Pedersen, E. J. et al. When and why do third parties punish outside of the lab? A cross-cultural recall study. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 11, 846–853 (2020).
Guala, F. Reciprocity: weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate. Behav. Brain Sci. 35, 1–15 (2010).
Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizable groups. Ethol. Sociobiol. 13, 171–195 (1992).
Gintis, H. Strong reciprocity and human sociality. J. Theor. Biol. 206, 169–179 (2000).
Jordan, J. J. & Rand, D. G. Signaling when no one is watching: a reputation heuristics account of outrage and punishment in one-shot anonymous interactions. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 118, 57–88 (2020).
Jordan, J. J., Hoffman, M., Bloom, P. & Rand, D. G. Third-party punishment as a costly signal of trustworthiness. Nature 530, 473–476 (2016).
Barclay, P. Reputational benefits for altruistic punishment. Evol. Hum. Behav. 27, 325–344 (2006).
Bloom, P. Just Babies: The Origins of Good and Evil (Crown Publishers, 2013).
Sally, D. & Hill, E. The development of interpersonal strategy: autism, theory-of-mind, cooperation and fairness. J. Econ. Psychol. 27, 73–97 (2006).
Bernhard, R. M., Martin, J. W. & Warneken, F. Why do children punish? Fair outcomes matter more than intent in children’s second-and third-party punishment. J. Exp. Child. Psychol. 200, 104909 (2020).
Gummerum, M. & Chu, M. T. Outcomes and intentions in children’s, adolescents’, and adults’ second-and third-party punishment behavior. Cognition 133, 97–103 (2014).
Jensen, K., Call, J. & Tomasello, M. Chimpanzees are vengeful but not spiteful. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 13046–13050 (2007).
Mendes, N., Steinbeis, N., Bueno-Guerra, N., Call, J. & Singer, T. Preschool children and chimpanzees incur costs to watch punishment of antisocial others. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 45–51 (2018).
Riedl, K., Jensen, K., Call, J. & Tomasello, M. No third-party punishment in chimpanzees. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14824–14829 (2012).
Gummerum, M., Lopez-Perez, B., Van Dijk, E. & Van Dillen, L. F. When punishment is emotion-driven: children’s, adolescents’, and adults’ costly punishment of unfair allocations. Soc. Dev. 29, 126–142 (2020).
Gummerum, M., Lopez-Perez, B., Van Dijk, E. & Van Dillen, L. F. Ire and punishment: incidental anger and costly punishment in children, adolescents, and adults. J. Exp. Child. Psychol. 218, 105376 (2022).
Marshall., J. & McAuliffe, K. in The Oxford Handbook of Evolution and Emotions (ed. Al-Shawaf, L. & Shackelford, T. K.) (Oxford Univ. Press, in the press).
Spohn, C. How Do Judges Decide?: The Search for Fairness and Justice in Punishment (Sage, 2008).
Baumgartner, T., Götte, L., Gügler, R. & Fehr, E. The mentalizing network orchestrates the impact of parochial altruism on social norm enforcement. Hum. Brain Mapp. 33, 1452–1469 (2012).
Brunson, R. K. & Miller, J. Young black men and urban policing in the United States. Br. J. Criminol. 46, 613–640 (2006).
Delton, A. W. & Krasnow, M. M. The psychology of deterrence explains why group membership matters for third-party punishment. Evol. Hum. Behav. 38, 734–743 (2017).
Guo, R., Ding, J. & Wu, Z. How intergroup relation moderates group bias in third-party punishment. Acta Psychol. 205, 103055 (2020).
Lieberman, D. & Linke, L. The effect of social category on third party punishment. Evol. Psychol. 5, 147470490700500203 (2007).
Okonofua, J. A. & Eberhardt, J. L. Two strikes: race and the disciplining of young students. Psychol. Sci. 26, 617–624 (2015).
Rucker, J. M. & Richeson, J. A. Toward an understanding of structural racism: implications for criminal justice. Science 374, 286–290 (2021).
Chapman, M. S., May, K. E., Scofield, J., DeCoster, J. & Bui, C. Does group membership affect children’s judgments of social transgressions? J. Exp. Child. Psychol. 189, 104695 (2020).
Schuhmacher, N. & Kärtner, J. Preschoolers prefer in‐group to out‐group members, but equally condemn their immoral acts. Soc. Dev. 28, 1074–1094 (2019).
McAuliffe, K. & Dunham, Y. Group bias in cooperative norm enforcement. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 371, 20150073 (2016).
Gonzalez-Gadea, M. L., Dominguez, A. & Petroni, A. Children’s group biases in third-party punishment are guided by norms-focused behaviors. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/pxyw4 (2020).
Jordan, J. J., McAuliffe, K. & Warneken, F. Development of in-group favoritism in children’s third-party punishment of selfishness. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 12710–12715 (2014).
Clutton-Brock, T. H. & Parker, G. A. Punishment in animal societies. Nature 373, 209–216 (1995).
Raihani, N. J., Grutter, A. S. & Bshary, R. Punishers benefit from third-party punishment in fish. Science 327, 171–171 (2010).
Bshary, R., Grutter, A. S., Willener, A. S. & Leimar, O. Pairs of cooperating cleaner fish provide better service quality than singletons. Nature 455, 964–966 (2008).
Jensen, K., Call, J. & Tomasello, M. Chimpanzees are rational maximizers in an ultimatum game. Science 318, 107–109 (2007).
Proctor, D., Williamson, R. A., de Waal, F. B. & Brosnan, S. F. Chimpanzees play the ultimatum game. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 2070–2075 (2013).
The authors would like to thank the members of the Cooperation Lab, F. Warneken, Y. Lee and F. Ting for their feedback on this manuscript.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Psychology thanks Maria Gonzalez-Gadea and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Marshall, J., McAuliffe, K. Children as assessors and agents of third-party punishment. Nat Rev Psychol 1, 334–344 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00046-y