Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Diversifying collaboration networks to increase equity in psychology

Nature Reviews Psychology volume 1, pages 9–10 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Insular collaboration networks contribute to inequities in academic psychology by concentrating resources and reputation among members of majority groups. By actively diversifying their networks, researchers can improve their science and reduce inequity.

There is a leaky pipeline in psychological science: fewer women than men and fewer Black than white individuals advance beyond early career stages. As of 2018, women made up more than 70% of psychology doctorate degree recipients, and yet only 44% of authors of psychology articles1 and about 50% of tenured psychology faculty were women2. There is also a publication gap for minoritized individuals, based on race3 and disability status, and at the intersection of identities4,5. The causes of this inequitable representation in academic psychology are multi-faceted and hotly debated6.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

Buy

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Odic, D. & Wojcik, E. H. The publication gender gap in psychology. Am. Psychol. 75, 92–103 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S. & Williams, W. M. Women in academic science: a changing landscape. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 15, 75–141 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Roberts, S. O., Bareket-Shavit, C., Dollins, F. A., Goldie, P. D. & Mortenson, E. Racial inequality in psychological research: trends of the past and recommendations for the future. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 15, 1295–1309 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yerbury, J. J. & Yerbury, R. M. Disabled in academia: to be or not to be, that is the question. Trends Neurosci. 44, 507–509 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eaton, A. A., Saunders, J. F., Jacobson, R. K. & West, K. How gender and race stereotypes impact the advancement of scholars in STEM: professors’ biased evaluations of physics and biology post-doctoral candidates. Sex Roles 82, 127–141 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gruber, J. et al. The future of women in psychological science. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 16, 483–516 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Piocuda, J. E., Smyers, J. O., Knyshev, E., Harris, R. J. & Rai, M. Trends of internationalization and collaboration in U.S. psychology journals 1950–2010. Arch. Sci. Psychol. 3, 82–92 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Joseph, T. D. & Hirshfield, L. E. ‘Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethn. Racial Stud. 34, 121–141 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hofstra, B. et al. The diversity–innovation paradox in science. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 9284–9291 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheplygina, V., Hermans, F., Albers, C., Bielczyk, N. & Smeets, I. Ten simple rules for getting started on Twitter as a scientist. PLOS Computat. Biol. 16, e1007513 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks D. Vuvan for feedback on a previous version of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, USA

    Erica Hsiung Wojcik

Authors
  1. Erica Hsiung Wojcik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erica Hsiung Wojcik.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wojcik, E.H. Diversifying collaboration networks to increase equity in psychology. Nat Rev Psychol 1, 9–10 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-021-00014-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-021-00014-y

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing