Abstract
Deep sediments host many archaeal lineages, including the Asgard superphylum which contains lineages predicted to require syntrophic partnerships. Our knowledge about sedimentary archaeal diversity and their metabolic pathways and syntrophic partners is still very limited. We present here new genomes of Helarchaeota and the co-occurring sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) recovered from organic-rich sediments off Costa Rica Margin. Phylogenetic analyses revealed three new metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) affiliating with Helarchaeota, each of which has three variants of the methyl-CoM reductase-like (MCR-like) complex that may enable them to oxidize short-chain alkanes anaerobically. These Helarchaeota have no multi-heme cytochromes but have Group 3b and Group 3c [NiFe] hydrogenases, and formate dehydrogenase, and therefore have the capacity to transfer the reducing equivalents (in the forms of hydrogen and formate) generated from alkane oxidation to external partners. We also recovered five MAGs of SRB affiliated with the class of Desulfobacteria, two of which showed relative abundances (represented by genome coverages) positively correlated with those of the three Helarchaeota. Genome analysis suggested that these SRB bacteria have the capacity of H2 and formate utilization and could facilitate electron transfers from other organisms by means of these reduced substances. Their co-occurrence and metabolic features suggest that Helarchaeota may metabolize synergistically with some SRB, and together exert an important influence on the carbon cycle by mitigating the hydrocarbon emission from sediments to the overlying ocean.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Many of the total microbial cells in the marine environment are estimated to be present in marine sediments [1], of which a considerable fraction are archaea [2,3,4]. Although archaeal communities in oligotrophic and often oxic sediments are dominated by aerobic ammonia-oxidizing Thaumarchaeota [5,6,7,8], those in coastal and often organic-rich sediments are more diverse and complex [9], and their metabolic activity exerts a critical influence on the carbon and nutrient cycling on the global scale (e.g., [10,11,12]).
The Asgard superphylum of archaea is of evolutionary importance because its present-day members are thought to share a common ancestor with modern eukaryotes [13, 14]. The archaeal phyla of this superphylum, including but not limited to Lokiarchaeota, Thorarchaeota, Odinarchaeota, and Heimdallarchaeota, have been established by metagenome-assembled genomes (e.g., [13, 15]). A recent analysis of available Asgard 16S rRNA gene sequences [16] showed that some sequences cannot be resolved to the existing lineages and thus suggested the diversity of Asgard archaea is likely broader than currently recognized [17]. Marine sediment is the natural habitat of the only cultured Asgard archaeon Candidatus Prometheoarchaeum syntrophicum MK-D1 [18] and the vast majority of known Asgard archaea discovered via metagenomic analysis [13, 14], so further exploration of marine sediment is promising to increase our understanding about this fascinating branch of life by recovering more novel lineages. This speculation is supported by the recent discovery of new Asgard lineages, such as Helarchaeota [19] in hydrothermal sediments in the Guaymas Basin (GB) and Sifarchaetoa in organic-rich sediments of the Costa Rica Margin [20].
Genome analysis and laboratory cultures suggest that some Asgard archaea in marine sediments will need external partner cells to consume the reducing equivalents (e.g., in the forms of hydrogen and formate) generated during organic matter degradation [18, 21]. Helarchaeota from GB encode the Methyl-CoM reductase-like complex (MCR-like complex) and are proposed to be capable of oxidizing short-chain alkanes to conserve energy [19], using a pathway similar as other thermophilic alkane-oxidizing Euryarchaeota enriched from the same location [22, 23]. Most of these characterized alkane-oxidizing archaea form consortia with sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) that use the reducing equivalents released during alkane oxidation for sulfate reduction [22,23,24], although some alkane-oxidizing archaea can also channel the electrons to their own internal methanogenesis pathway [24, 25]. As a prevalent SRB in hydrothermal sediments, Candidatus Desulfofervidus auxilii [26] is the dominant partner bacteria of the characterized alkane-oxidizing Euryarchaeota in heated marine sediments [22, 23]. However, the potential sinks of the reducing equivalents of Helarchaeota in other sediment environments remain elusive.
Scientific drilling off the Costa Rica Margin during International Ocean Drilling Program (IODP) Expedition 334 provided an excellent avenue to explore the diversity of archaea, because sediments from this location were shown to harbor high abundances [27] and also phylogenetically novel lineages of archaea [20, 28]. The drilled sites are in the forearc basin of the subduction zone, where a considerable fraction of carbon exchange between Earth’s surface and interior occurs [29]. Abundant thermogenic alkanes (ethane, propane, and butane) were detected in the deep sediments, but not the surface sediments [30, 31]. This prompted us to perform further metagenomic sequencing and analysis on shallow sediment samples from this expedition, to explore the mechanisms of alkane depletion in this unique setting. Here, we report three new Helarchaeota metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) in shallow sediments of Hole U1379B, each of which has three variants of the MCR-like complex and could be significant alkane-oxidizing archaea in this sediment. These Helarchaeota account for the majority of the mcrA-bearing archaea community, with the rest of mcrA-bearing archaea affiliated to the typically methanotrophic family of ANME-1. We also recovered five novel MAGs of sulfate-reducing bacteria in the class of Desulfobacteria, some of which could be the syntrophic partners of Helarchaeota due to their co-occurring pattern and their matched metabolic capacities of H2 and formate utilization. This study expands our understanding about the diversity, metabolic functions, and interspecies dependency of Helarchaeota, which could exert a profound influence on the volatile carbon exchange between marine sediments and the overlying seawater.
Results and discussion
Geochemical context
IODP Site U1379 is located on the upper slope of the erosive subduction zone off the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica. The sediment pile at this site is estimated to be 890 m thick and is characterized by high sedimentation rates of 1.60–10.35 cm/ky [30] and low porosities of ~0.6 [30]. We focused this study on shallow sediments, 2–9 m below seafloor (mbsf), of U1379B, including a total of eight subsampled whole-round cores. Sediments in this depth interval are within the sulfate reduction zone with porewater sulfate concentration decreasing with depth (Fig. 1A). The sulfate-depletion depth was not examined in this study but was noted at ~30 mbsf [30]. Dissolved Mn concentrations in the porewater show the same decreasing trend as sulfate (Fig. 1B), indicating that Mn2+ is mainly consumed rather than produced, and therefore Mn oxides might not be the major terminal electron acceptor. The increasing porewater concentrations of ammonium (Fig. 1C) and alkalinity (Fig. 1D) with depth reflect the ongoing degradation of organic matter, with sulfate as the most prominent electron acceptor based on available measurements.
Microbial abundances and overall community structures
We used domain-specific primers [6] to quantify the abundance of archaeal and bacterial 16S rRNA genes in the nine sediment horizons from 2 to 9 mbsf of Hole U1379B. Both archaeal and bacterial 16S rRNA gene abundances are stable throughout the examined sediments (Fig. 1E). However, archaea are about one order of magnitude lower than bacteria, resulting in bacterial dominance in most of the studied samples except the shallowest sample (~2 mbsf).
In order to maximize archaeal genome recovery, we selected four sediment horizons (2.45, 3.20, 7.70, and 8.23 mbsf) for shotgun metagenome sequencing, due to the high proportions of archaea in these sediment horizons assessed by qPCR (Fig. 1E). We examined the microbial community structures in these four samples by 16S rRNA gene analyses based on both the un-assembled metagenome reads and the 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing data (Fig. 2). Based on the metagenome data, in the archaeal domain, Bathyarchaeota is the major archaeal phylum and accounts for on average 44.7% (37.7–51.2% in individual samples) of the total communities, while Asgard archaea especially Lokiarchaeota were also detected to account for on average 5.6% (2.6–8.7% in individual samples) of the total communities (Fig. 2a). In the bacterial domain, Chloroflexi is the most dominant phylum, which accounts for on average 19.0% of the total communities in different depths. Other major bacterial phyla include Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Elusimicrobia, Planctomycetes, and Proteobacteria (mainly Deltaproteobacteria) (Fig. 2A). Similar results were also obtained from the 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and analysis (Fig. 2B). These results are consistent with the previous assessments of microbial community structures of marine sediments off Costa Rica [27, 28].
The presence and diversity of mcrA-bearing microbes
As common products of thermocatalytic degradation of organic matter in subduction zones of high temperature and pressure, C2–C5 alkanes (ethane, propane, butane, and pentane) were measured in sediments deeper than 50 mbsf [30] (Fig. S1). Alkanes in U1379 were generally not detected in the sediments shallower than 50 mbsf and no flux toward the overlying water column can be quantified, suggesting that most of the upward diffusing fluxes of alkanes are consumed in the shallow sediments. To examine the presence and overall diversity of potentially alkane-consuming archaea in the CR sediments, we employed the GraftM program [32] to analyze the mcrA gene (encoding the methyl-CoM reductase alpha subunit, the key enzyme of methane/alkane metabolism) in the metagenome datasets, in which analysis putative mcrA gene sequences were identified using HMMs and classified by placing onto the pre-constructed phylogenetic tree described in [33]. Our results revealed that mcrA gene was present in all the four sediment horizons where the metagenomes sequencing data were generated from. Except for 3.20 mbsf, the mcrA-containing archaeal communities in all the other three horizons were not dominated by well-known archaea in the Euryarchaeota phylum (Figs. S2 and S3), indicating that under-studied archaea may be the dominant methane/alkane metabolizing microbes in the CR sediments, which supports the recently expanded phylogenetic breadth of methane/alkane-metabolizing archaea [24, 34, 35].
Helarchaeota MAGs from CR sediments
Through metagenome assembly and binning, we obtained 12 archaeal MAGs that could be taxonomically assigned to the Asgard superphylum, three of which are affiliated with the newly proposed Helarchaeota phylum [19], four Lokiarchaeota, and three Heimdallarchaeota (Fig. 3A). These three Helarchaeota MAGs (CR_Bin_097, CR_ Bin_143, and CR_ Bin_291) expand the diversity of this newly proposed phylum, doubling the number of available Helarchaeota genomes [19, 36]. The genome sizes of the three CR Helarchaeota MAGs are similar to SZ_4_Bin10.384 (4.7 Mbp) recovered from coastal sediments [36], but are larger than two Helarchaeota genomes recovered from GB (4.7–5.4 Mbp versus 3.54–3.84 Mbp for GB Helarchaeota; Table 1). The CR Helarchaeota MAGs have 4592–4957 coding sequences distributed on 212–589 scaffolds (Table 1). Based on the calculated average amino acid identity (AAI), the six available Helarchaeota genomes could be resolved to four genera (i.e., with <65% intra-genera AAIs; [37]): Hel_GB_A, CR_Bin_097, and CR_Bin_291 belong to a genus, while each of the other three genomes represents a separated genus (Fig. S4).
Among the three CR Helarchaeota MAGs, only CR_Bin_097 has a reconstructed partial (1191 bp) 16S rRNA gene sequence. This is notable since none of the previously reported Helarchaeota MAGs has a 16S rRNA gene sequence [19, 36]. An alignment of the 16S rRNA gene sequence of Helarchaeota CR_Bin_097 and other archaea revealed three insertions of >20 bp in this sequence and also other environmental clones of Asgard archaea. These insertions unfortunately prevent a perfect match between Helarchaeota CR_Bin_097 and the amplicon operational taxonomy units (OTUs), making it challenging to accurately estimate the distribution of these Helarchaeota in the shallow sediment horizons of Hole U1379. However, based on the read recruiting and genome coverage calculation, the three Helarchaeota seem to have similar distribution patterns and be highest in the depth of 7.70 mbsf sample (Fig. S5). The 16S rRNA gene of CR_Bin_097, after manual removal of the insertions, showed nucleotide identities of >90% to diverse uncultured archaeal sequences from marine anoxic sediments, which together formed a monophyletic clade in the phylogenetic tree of archaeal 16S rRNA gene (Fig. 3B), supporting that Helarchaeota is a separate phylum within the Asgard superphylum.
Alkane oxidation potential of CR Archaea
Similar to the GB Helarchaeota [19], Helarchaeota in CR sediments have the potential of alkane oxidation. Each of the three CR Helarchaeota MAGs has three variants of methyl-CoM reductase-like enzymes (McrABG operon, or MCR) (Fig. 4), whereas the previously reported Helarchaeota MAGs [19, 36] have only 1–2 MCR variants. Phylogenetic analyses of the alpha subunit of methyl-CoM reductase-like enzymes (McrA) revealed that McrA sequences of the six available Helarchaeota MAGs form three clusters (Hel Clusters I, II, and III) within a monophyletic cluster together with homologs of Hadesarchaea, Bathyarchaeota, and Ca. Methanoliparia (Fig. 4). These lineages also form a monophyletic clade with McrA homologs of Syntrophoarchaea, Argoarchaeum ethanivorans, and Ethanoperedens thermophilum [38], which are all alkane-oxidizing Euryarchaeota confirmed by laboratory incubations [22,23,24]. Because mcr-like genes so far have not been found in any Asgard phylum other than Helarchaeota, mcr genes in Helarchaeota, as recently suggested [35], may not be vertical inherited from the ancestor of Asgard archaea but instead may have resulted from horizontal gene transfer events from alkane-oxidizing Euryarchaeota although the timing is still uncertain. The three Hel clusters of McrA are divergent, with intra-cluster similarities in the range of 44–63%. Multiple divergent mcr-like genes were also reported in “Ca. Syntrophoarchaeum” genomes, in which the duplicated mcr-like genes have evolved to use substrates other than methane, such as butane and propane [22]. These CR Helarchaeota MAGs also possess genes associated with the archaeal Wood-Ljungdahl, fatty acids beta-oxidation, and other pathways similar to those found in the characterized alkane-oxidizing genomes [22, 38] that have been recently identified [19]. Therefore, the gene duplication in Helarchaeota may lead to the neofunctionalization [39] of the MCR-like complex, and enable them to metabolize short-chain alkanes of different lengths anaerobically.
Among the MCR-containing MAGs from CR sediments, in addition to the three Helarchaeota MAGs, we also recovered an MAG (CR_Bin_179) affiliated with ANME-1. Based on the phylogenetic analysis of the 15 concatenated ribosomal proteins [40], this MAG should represent a new genus within the family of ANME-1 (Fig. S6A), which is also supported by the classification of GTDB-tk [41] using the 122 single-copy genes of archaea, and the calculated 69%-76% AAI between this MAG and the others in the family of ANME-1 (Supplementary Table S1). CR_ANME1_Bin_179 has a near full-length 16S rRNA gene sequence (1487 bp) (Fig. S6B), which shows an identity of 94.9% with that of ANME1_CONS3730B06UFb1 (a MAG recovered from Hydrate Ridge methane seep sediments [42]) and even lower identities with the other genomes in the family of ANME-1, supporting that this genome should represent a new genus [37]. Its genomic close relatives include ANME1_CONS3730B06UFb1 recovered from Hydrate Ridge methane seep sediments, M5.MMPM from Aarhus Bay sediments, and ANME-1-THS recovered from Tibetan hot spring sediments, for all of which methane metabolism pathways have been proposed [34, 42, 43]. CR_ANME1_Bin_179 may be involved in methane metabolisms, which was supported by the partial MCR operon (constituted by McrB and McrG but the McrA is missing) detected in this genome.
To assess the representability of these McrA-bearing genomes in the CR sediments, we performed a phylogenetic analysis of McrA amino acid sequences in the bulk metagenome assemblies of the four CR sediment layers. Our results indicate that all McrA sequences from CR metagenomes were affiliated with either the three Helarchaeota clusters or the ANME-1 cluster (Fig. S3). Because CR_ ANME1_Bin_179 may only be involved in methane but not alkane metabolisms, CR Helarchaeota could be responsible for the majority of alkane depletion in the surface sediments at U1379.
Hydrogenases in Helarchaeota
Alkane-oxidizing archaea need to employ various means to channel the reducing equivalents generated during the oxidation of alkanes to either another internal metabolic pathway [25] or to external partner cells [22,23,24]. Helarchaeota MAGs recovered from CR likely have to depend on bacterial partners as external electron sinks because they do not have (1) the internal pathways for the reduction of sulfate or nitrate/nitrite, (2) multi-heme cytochromes (Table 1), or (3) Type IV electric pilins for extracellular electron transfer to solid electron acceptors (e.g., metal oxides). Instead, these Helarchaeota MAGs from CR contain Group 3 [NiFe] hydrogenases and formate dehydrogenases that could facilitate the transfer of the reducing equivalents in the forms of H2 and formate. Phylogenetic analysis of the hydrogenase subunit alpha indicates that all Helarchaeota MAGs have one Group 3b [NiFe] hydrogenase and one Group 3c [NiFe] hydrogenase (Fig. 5A), except for CR_Bin_143 where the lack of recovery may be due to its lower genome completeness. Helarchaeota Group 3b [NiFe] hydrogenases formed a monophyletic cluster with homologs of diverse Lokiarchaeota genomes [21], but were divergent from other Group 3b lineages (Fig. 5A). Similarly, Helarchaeota Group 3c hydrogenases also formed a monophyletic cluster with homologs from diverse Lokiarchaeota and Thorarchaeota genomes [21] (Fig. 5A). Interestingly, the only hydrogenase in the closed genome of the cultured Ca. Prometheoarchaeum syntrophicum MK-D1 [18] is also affiliated with this cluster. Ca. Prometheoarchaeum syntrophicum was revealed to depend on partnering cells to consume the reduced equivalents in the forms of H2 and/or formate [18], in which the Group 3c hydrogenase may be dedicated to this function. It is worth noting that the gene cluster proposed by Seitz et al. [19] as the energy-transfer complex in Helarchaeota contains the Group 3b hydrogenase alpha subunit (hydB/Nqo4-like in ref. [19].). In addition to the two Helarchaeota from GB, this gene cluster is also conserved in the genomes of Helarchaeota CR_Bin_097 (two variants) and Helarchaeota SZ_4_Bin10.384 (Fig. 5B). The congruence between the phylogenies of Asgard Group 3 hydrogenases and their genomes suggested that these hydrogenases may be vertically inherited from their ancestor rather than horizontal transferred from other organisms. Even though these Asgard-specific Group 3 [NiFe] hydrogenases are probably not membrane-bound, they could still play an important role in hydrogen production and transfer between organisms, given that the genome of the cultured Lokiarchaeota has a single Group 3c [NiFe] hydrogenase (Fig. 5A).
Co-occurrence of sulfate-reducing bacteria and Helarchaeota
The potential partner bacteria of Helarchaeota have not been identified previously, as no genomes were found co-occurring with Helarchaeota MAGs in previous studies [19]. From the same metagenome sequencing dataset, we recovered five bacterial MAGs affiliated to the phylum of Desulfobacterota (Figs. 6A and 7), which was expected due to these samples being taken from the sulfate reduction zone (Fig. 1). Four of them have the complete dissimilatory sulfate reduction pathway (constituted by sulfate adenylyltransferase (sat), adenylyl-sulfate reductase (AprAB), and dissimilatory sulfite reductase (DsrAB)), while the incompletion of this pathway in CR_bin_60 could be due to the low genome completion (71% based on bacterial single-copy genes, Table 1). Phylogenomic analysis based on the 15 concatenated ribosomal proteins suggested that all the five SRB MAGs from Costa Rica margin sediments are affiliated to the class of Desulfobacteria in the phylum Desulfubacterota, according to the genome-based taxonomy classification frame [44], and are different from Ca. Desulfofervidus auxilii [26], the partner bacterium of thermophilic alkane-oxidizing archaea, which is affiliated to the class of Desulfofervidia (Fig. 6A). CR_bin_073, CR_bin_276, and CR_bin_277 are members of the order of “C00003060” (Fig. 6A), which corresponds to the lineage of SEEP-SRB1c [42]. The close relative genomes in the order of C00003060 are exclusively recovered from hydrocarbon-rich marine sediments, such as cold seep sites on Hydrate Ridge off the Pacific coast [42], and B60_G16 recovered from GB hydrothermal sediments [45]. The other two MAGs, CR_bin_129 and CR_bin_060, formed a new lineage within the order of Desulfatiglandales, together with MAGs recovered from hydrocarbon-rich sediments in GB [45] and Gulf of Mexico [46] (Fig. 6A).
Among the five SRB MAGs, only CR_Bin_276 has an identifiable partial (743 bp) 16S rRNA gene. It shows >99% identity (with two mismatches) with OTU_8 of the amplicon sequencing data. Due to the difficulties to link the Helarchaeota and SRB MAGs with short amplicon OTUs (i.e., Helarchaeota_Bin_097 does not match with any OTUs, while only one SRB has a 16S rRNA gene and matches with OTU_8), we use genome coverage as a proxy to represent the relative abundance of MAGs in each of the four metagenome samples. We found that all CR Helarchaeota MAG coverages show positive linear correlations with two of the five SRB MAGs (CR_bin_129 and CR_bin_277) (Fig. 6B-6D), representing both lineages of SRB recovered from CR. To attempt to catch these MAGs in action, we also calculated iRep, the index of replication [47], of Helarchaeota and SRB genomes in the CR sediments. iRep of all three Helarchaeota MAGs was only detected in 7.70 mbsf, while among the SRB MAGs only CR_Bin_129 had a calculable iRep (Fig. S7), suggesting CR_Bin_129 is active and co-occurring with Helarchaeota in the CR sediments.
In addition to the abundance correlations, metabolic pathway analysis of the MAGs also support that the co-occurring Helarchaeota and SRB bacteria in CR sediments may engage in synergy metabolism, in which SRB are capable of utilizing the products of the alkane oxidation activity of Helarchaeota, H2 and formate (Fig. 7). Three of the five SRB MAGs from CR (CR_bin_073, CR_bin_129, and CR_bin_276) contain a periplasmic hydrogenase affiliated to a novel lineage we describe as Group 3e in the Group 3 [NiFe] hydrogenases (Fig. 5A). This lineage was not well resolved in previous phylogenetic analysis [48] probably due to the small number sequences then available. This hydrogenase may enable these SRBs to conserve energy from the oxidation of H2, similar as D. auxilii, which contains a periplasmic hydrogenase and is capable of growing using H2 in the absence of an ANME partner [26]. However, the bi-directional nature of hydrogenase may enable it to produce hydrogen. Future studies with laboratory cultures are needed to verity this. All the five SRB MAGs additionally have two copies of respiratory formate dehydrogenases, indicating that they also have the capacity of oxidizing formate that is potentially released by the Helarchaeota as a form of reducing equivalents (Fig. 7).
The SBR genomes from CR sediments also contain the full gene set for the synthesis of flagella, which have previously been reported to be an important feature of syntrophy establishment [49] and could be important in initiating the contact between SRB and Helarchaeota.
Sulfate-dependent alkane oxidation is thermodynamically favorable
To explore if this co-occurrence is energetically favorable, we calculated the Gibbs free energies of the oxidation of short-chain alkanes (ethane, propane, and butane) when coupled to sulfate reduction (Supplementary Table S2) under the near in situ conditions in the shallow sediments at CR. Our results showed that the Gibbs free energy of the sulfate-dependent alkane oxidation (in the unit of kJ m−1 alkane) is feasible over a wide range of alkane concentrations (10−6–1 µM), and is highest for butane, followed by propane and ethane (Fig. S8). Importantly, these short-chain alkanes can provide more energy than methane per mole of oxidized alkane (Fig. S8), suggesting that these alkanes are more energy-rich than methane and could be more easily consumed by microbes such as the Helarchaeota and SRB detected in CR.
Although more data are required to properly assess the ecological roles of Helarchaeota in the environment, all known Helarchaeota so far are found in hydrocarbon-rich marine sediments [19] and seem to be intrinsically related to the oxidation of alkanes. If they have a sulfate-reducing bacterial partner, their syntrophic metabolic reactions, the sulfate-dependent alkane oxidations, are also high energy-yielding processes. Analogous to the role anaerobic methane-oxidizing archaea have on reducing methane emission from marine sediments [50], the activities of Helarchaeota and SRB in marine sediments may convert alkane to CO2 at the expense of sulfate reduction and, therefore, reduce the emission of alkanes into the overlying water column (Fig. S1).
Conclusion
This study revealed that the majority of Asgard archaeal cells in sulfate-reducing organic-rich shallow sediments co-occur with SRB in the subduction zone off Costa Rica. Among these are three new Helarchaeota identified as MAGs, each of which have three variants of the MCR operon, and may anaerobically oxidize the steadily available alkane that is thermogenically produced from organic matter degradation in deep sediments. Like other characterized thermophilic alkane-oxidizing archaea, these Helarchaeota may engage in a syntrophic relationship with the co-occurring sulfate-reducing bacteria from the class of Desulfobacteria. These findings expand the diversity of Helarchaeota, and suggest that geological products such as hydrocarbons released from thermogenic processes in subduction zones exemplified by the Costa Rica Margin could play an important role in fueling the catabolism of microbial life in the marine deep biosphere. Experimental approaches, such as laboratory incubations complemented with cell visualization, further microscopic observations and transcriptome sequencing [22] are required to confirm these proposed syntrophic interactions.
Materials and methods
Study sites and sample collection
Sediments used in this study were collected from Hole U1379B at the Costa Rica margin during the IODP Expedition 334. This site is located on the Caribbean plate shelf into the upper slope, with the water depth of this site is 127 m. Sediments in this Hole were drilled using the advanced piston corer system with the core recovery of 100%. Detail of drilling at this site was provided in [51]. Thorough descriptions of the sediment properties were published elsewhere [27, 30]. Whole-round cores of 10-cm long for microbiology analyses were capped upon drilling using blue plastic caps at both ends, and stored in anoxic plastic bags. Microbiology samples were stored at the Gulf Coast Repository of IODP at −80 °C and then were shipped to the University of Delaware and stored in −80 °C freezer until further analyses.
We in this study focused on the shallow silty clay sediments of 2–9 mbsf from Hole U1379B, which is 20 m south to Hole U1379C where the most comprehensive geochemical profiles at this station were measured. The geochemical profiles of sediment in this interval of U1379C were reported in previous publications: porewater concentrations of sulfate, ammonium, and alkalinity in Expedition 334 Scientists [30], and dissolved manganese in [52]. Procedures for hydrocarbon composition determined by headspace analysis were described in [53], and the data can be found in the IODP Expedition 334 report (http://publications.iodp.org/proceedings/334/334toc.htm).
DNA extraction, quantitative PCR, and amplicon analysis
DNA for amplicon sequencing was extracted from 0.5 g of sediment using the PowerSoil DNA extraction kit (MOBIO, CA). A parallel extraction blank without adding sample material, in the beginning, was also perform to track the potential contamination introduced during the experimental process. DNA for metagenomic sequencing was extracted from about 5 g of sediment (0.5 g was added into each of the 10 lysis tubes) using the PowerSoil DNA extraction kit (MOBIO, CA). For each sample, DNA extracts from the ten parallel extractions were eluted with 100 µL double-distilled H2O into a single 1.5-mL Eppendorf tube and preserved at −20 oC for further analyses.
The bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA genes were quantified using the primer sets Uni341/Uni519 and Uni515F/Arc908r, respectively, combining with the thermal conditions described in [6]. For the amplicon preparation, a two-step strategy was employed to prepare the amplicons of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene with the primer pair Uni519F/806R and thermal cycling condition described elsewhere [6]. Details about the qPCR standard preparation, qPCR reaction chemistry, amplicon sequencing data analysis were presented in the Supplementary Information.
Metagenome assembly, binning, and genome refinement
Metagenomic libraries (2 × 150 paired-end) were prepared and sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 500 sequencing platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Quality of the reads and presence of adapter sequences were checked using FastQC v.0.11.5 [54] and then trimmed using Trimmomatic v.0.36 [55]. Putative 16S rRNA genes in the trimmed metagenome reads were used to assess the microbial community structure using phyloFlash v3.3 beta 2 [56], in which the short reads were identified and classified against the SILVA 132 release.
The quality-controlled paired-end reads were de novo assembled into contigs using Megahit v.1.1.2 [57] with the k-mer length varying from 27 to 117. Contigs longer than 1000 bp were automatically binned with MaxBin2 v2.2.6 [58] using the default parameters. The quality of the obtained genome bins was assessed using CheckM v.1.0.7 [59] with the option “lineage_wf”, which uses lineage-specific sets of single-copy genes to estimate completeness and contamination and assigns contamination to strain heterogeneity if amino acid identity is >90%. Genome bins of >50% completeness were manually refined using the R package gbtools [60], based on the GC content, taxonomic assignments, and differential coverages in different samples. To improve the quality of MAGs, metagenome reads of the sample with the highest coverage was detected were mapped onto the MAG contigs using BBmap [61], and the aligned reads were re-assembled using SPAdes v.3.12.0 [62] with the default parameters and minimum contig length of 1000 bp. The resulting scaffolds were visualized and re-binned using gbtools [60] as described above. The qualities of the resulting MAGs were checked using the CheckM “lineage_wf” command again. Details were presented in the Supplementary Information.
mcrA gene detection using GraftM
Reads of mcrA in the unassembled metagenome sequencing data were identified and classified using GraftM v0.13.1 [32], with the pre-curated mcrA package (including HMM profiles and pre-constructed phylogenetic tree) described in ref. [33]. as the reference database (downloaded from https://data.ace.uq.edu.au/public/graftm/7/).
Genome annotation
Genome annotation was conducted using Prokka v.1.13 [63], eggNOG [64], and BlastKoala [65] using the KEGG database. The functional assignments of genes of interest were also confirmed using BLASTp against the NCBI RefSeq database. The metabolic pathways were reconstructed using KEGG Mapper [66]. The gene synteny of the energy-transfer complex in Helarchaeota genomes was visualized using GeneSpy v1.2 [67], based on the GFF files from Prokka annotation.
For the multi-heme cytochrome detection, the heme-binding sites of a protein, the CXXCH motif, were counted using the python script “cytochrome_stats.py” described in ref. [68] (available at https://github.com/bondlab/scripts) with the amino acid sequences predicted with Prodigal [69] as the input. Proteins with >3 CXXCH motifs were counted as multi-heme cytochromes following the criteria described elsewhere [68, 70].
Average nucleotide identify between different genomes was calculated using FastANI with default parameters [71]. Average amino acid identify (AAI) was calculated using CompareM (https://github.com/dparks1134/CompareM) with the “aai_wf” option, in which the protein-coding sequences predicted by Prodigal [69] were taken as the input to identify orthologous proteins by all-vs-all reciprocal sequence similarity search with Diamond [72]. The average similarity of the orthologous proteins between the two genomes was taken as the pairwise AAI.
Phylogenetic analysis
For the phylogenomic analysis of Helarchaeota, representative genomes of all major archaeal lineages described in the GTDB database [44] were downloaded and included. For sulfate-reducing bacteria, representative genomes of the candidate bacteria phyla of Desulfobacterota, Desulfobacterota_A, and Desulfuromonadota (phyla per nomenclatures of GTDB; https://gtdb.ecogenomic.org/) were included. The phylogenomic analyses were based on markers consisting of 15 concatenated ribosomal proteins (rpL2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 14, 16, 18, 22, 24, and rpS3, 8, 10, 17, 19) that have been demonstrated to undergo limited lateral gene transfer [73]. These selected proteins, among the conservative single-copy ribosomal proteins included in [74], were identified in Anvi’o v.5.5 [75] using Hidden Markov Model (HMM) profiles, following the procedure outlined at http://merenlab.org/2017/06/07/phylogenomics/. Sequences were aligned individually using MUSCLE [76], and alignment gaps were removed using trimAl [77] with the mode of “automated”. Individual alignments of ribosomal proteins were concatenated. The maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree was reconstructed based on the concatenated alignment using IQ-TREE v1.6.10 [78] with LG + F + R6 as the best-fit evolutionary model selected by ModelFinder [79] and 1000 ultrafast bootstraps using UFBoot2 [80].
A maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA genes was also constructed based on an alignment of 16S rRNA gene sequences of the genomes included in the above-mentioned phylogenomic analysis. In addition, amplicon OTUs (287 bp) of Asgard archaea and their close relatives (environmental clones of >1300 bp) identified via BLASTn [81] in the NCBI database were also added. Sequences were aligned using MAFFT-LINSi [82], and putative insertions were manually trimmed in Unipro UGENE [83]. The maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree was inferred based on the insertion-free alignment using IQ-TREE v1.6.10 [78] with SYM + R5 as the best-fit evolutionary model determined by ModelFinder [79] and 1000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates using UFBoot2 [80].
For the phylogeny of McrA, in addition of Helarchaeota, the genomes of known MCR-bearing archaea genomes were downloaded from NCBI, annotated using Prokka v1.13 [63], and the McrA amino acid sequences were extracted. Phylogenetic analysis was also performed for the McrA sequences in the bulk assemblies of the four CR sediment horizons, in which the McrA sequences were extracted from the Prokka annotation outputs. In both analyses, all sequences were aligned using MAFFT-LINSi [82], trimmed using trimAl [77] with the mode of “automated”, and the maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was inferred using IQ-TREE v1.6.10 [78] with LG + F + R6 as the best-fit evolutionary model and 1000 fast bootstrap replicates.
For the phylogeny of [NiFe] hydrogenases, reference sequences were mainly extracted from refs. [84, 85]. [NiFe] hydrogenases of the genomes reported in this study were extracted from the Prokka annotations, and used as queries in BLASTp search [81] in the NCBI database to identify their close relatives. All retrieved sequences were aligned using MAFFT-LINSi [82], trimmed using trimAl [77] with the mode of “automated”, and the phylogenetic tree was reconstructed using IQ-TREE v1.6.10 [78], with the procedure described above.
Genome coverage calculation and the linear correlation
As a proxy of the relative abundance, genome coverages of MAGs in each of the four metagenome-sequenced sediment depths were determined by recruiting reads from the individual metagenome datasets using BBmap [61] with the read identity threshold of 98%. Relative abundances of the Helarchaeota MAGs in the total communities were also calculated as the product of the average coverage and genome size, divided by the total trimmed reads. Linear correlations between the five Desulfobacteria MAGs and the three Helarchaeota MAGs were determined in R [86], using Pearson correlation test.
Thermodynamic calculation
We assessed the feasibility of alkane oxidation processes by calculating the Gibbs free energy for reactions of sulfate-dependent oxidation of ethane, propane, butane as well as methane in the shallow sediments (<10 mbsf) (See Supplementary Table S2 for the chemical equations). Details are presented in the Supplementary Information.
Data availability
All sequencing data used in this study are available in the NCBI Short Reads Archive under the project number PRJNA599172. In particular, the amplicon sequencing data can be accessed through the BioSample numbers SAMN13740702–SAMN13740710. The raw metagenomic sequencing data are available in NCBI under the BioSample numbers SAMN13740741- SAMN13740744. The MAGs described in this study are available in NCBI with the accession numbers JABXJT000000000–JABXKA000000000.
References
Kallmeyer J, Pockalny R, Adhikari RR, Smith DC, D’Hondt S. Global distribution of microbial abundance and biomass in subseafloor sediment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:16213–6.
Lloyd KG, May MK, Kevorkian RT, Steen AD. Meta-analysis of quantification methods shows that Archaea and Bacteria have similar abundances in the subseafloor. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:7790–9.
Hoshino T, Inagaki F. Abundance and distribution of Archaea in the subseafloor sedimentary biosphere. ISME J. 2019;13:227–31.
Lipp JS, Morono Y, Inagaki F, Hinrichs K-U. Significant contribution of Archaea to extant biomass in marine subsurface sediments. Nature. 2008;454:991–4.
Vuillemin A, Wankel SD, Coskun ÖK, Magritsch T, Vargas S, Estes ER, et al. Archaea dominate oxic subseafloor communities over multimillion-year time scales. Sci Adv. 2019;5:eaaw4108.
Zhao R, Hannisdal B, Mogollon JM, Jørgensen SL. Nitrifier abundance and diversity peak at deep redox transition zones. Sci Rep. 2019;9:8633.
Hiraoka S, Hirai M, Matsui Y, Makabe A, Minegishi H, Tsuda M, et al. Microbial community and geochemical analyses of trans-trench sediments for understanding the roles of hadal environments. ISME J. 2020;14:740–56.
Hoshino T, Doi H, Uramoto GI, Wörmer L, Adhikari RR, Xiao N, et al. Global diversity of microbial communities in marine sediment. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020;117:27587–97.
Durbin AM, Teske A. Archaea in organic-lean and organic-rich marine subsurface sediments: an environmental gradient reflected in distinct phylogenetic lineages. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:168.
Biddle JF, Lipp JS, Lever MA, Lloyd KG, Sørensen KB, Anderson R, et al. Heterotrophic archaea dominate sedimentary subsurface ecosystems off Peru. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:3846–51.
Lloyd KG, Schreiber L, Petersen DG, Kjeldsen KU, Lever MA, Steen AD, et al. Predominant archaea in marine sediments degrade detrital proteins. Nature. 2013;496:215–8.
Yu T, Wu W, Liang W, Lever MA, Hinrichs K-U, Wang F. Growth of sedimentary Bathyarchaeota on lignin as an energy source. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115:6022–7.
Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka K, Caceres EF, Saw JH, Bäckström D, Juzokaite L, Vancaester E, et al. Asgard archaea illuminate the origin of eukaryotic cellular complexity. Nature. 2017;541:353–8.
Spang A, Saw JH, Jørgensen SL, Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka K, Martijn J, Lind AE, et al. Complex archaea that bridge the gap between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Nature. 2015;521:173–9.
Spang A, Caceres EF, Ettema TJG. Genomic exploration of the diversity, ecology, and evolution of the archaeal domain of life. Science. 2017;357:eaaf3883.
Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D590–D596.
Manoharan L, Kozlowski JA, Murdoch RW, Löffler FE, Sousa FL, Schleper C. Metagenomes from coastal marine sediments give insights into the ecological role and cellular features of Loki-and Thorarchaeota. mBio. 2019;10:e02039–02019.
Imachi H, Nobu MK, Nakahara N, Morono Y, Ogawara M, Takaki Y, et al. Isolation of an archaeon at the prokaryote–eukaryote interface. Nature. 2020;577:519–25.
Seitz KW, Dombrowski N, Eme L, Spang A, Lombard J, Sieber JR, et al. Asgard archaea capable of anaerobic hydrocarbon cycling. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1822.
Farag IF, Zhao R, Biddle JF. “Sifarchaeota” a novel Asgard phylum from Costa Rican sediment capable of polysaccharide degradation and anaerobic methylotrophy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021;87:e02584–02520.
Spang A, Stairs CW, Dombrowski N, Eme L, Lombard J, Caceres EF, et al. Proposal of the reverse flow model for the origin of the eukaryotic cell based on comparative analyses of Asgard archaeal metabolism. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:1138–48.
Laso-Pérez R, Wegener G, Knittel K, Widdel F, Harding KJ, Krukenberg V, et al. Thermophilic archaea activate butane via alkyl-coenzyme M formation. Nature. 2016;539:396–401.
Chen S-C, Musat N, Lechtenfeld OJ, Paschke H, Schmidt M, Said N, et al. Anaerobic oxidation of ethane by archaea from a marine hydrocarbon seep. Nature. 2019;568:108–11.
Wang Y, Wegener G, Hou J, Wang F, Xiao X. Expanding anaerobic alkane metabolism in the domain of Archaea. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:595–602.
Laso-Pérez R, Hahn C, van Vliet DM, Tegetmeyer HE, Schubotz F, Smit NT, et al. Anaerobic degradation of non-methane alkanes by “Candidatus Methanoliparia” in hydrocarbon seeps of the Gulf of Mexico. mBio. 2019;10:e01814–01819.
Krukenberg V, Harding K, Richter M, Glöckner FO, Gruber-Vodicka HR, Adam B, et al. Candidatus Desulfofervidus auxilii, a hydrogenotrophic sulfate‐reducing bacterium involved in the thermophilic anaerobic oxidation of methane. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18:3073–91.
Martino A, Rhodes ME, León-Zayas R, Valente IE, Biddle JF, House CH. Microbial diversity in sub-seafloor sediments from the Costa Rica Margin. Geosciences. 2019;9:218.
Farag IF, Biddle JF, Zhao R, Martino AJ, House CH, León-Zayas RI. Metabolic potentials of archaeal lineages resolved from metagenomes of deep Costa Rica sediments. ISME J. 2020;14:1345–58.
Barry PH, de Moor JM, Giovannelli D, Schrenk M, Hummer DR, Lopez T, et al. Forearc carbon sink reduces long-term volatile recycling into the mantle. Nature. 2019;568:487–92.
Expedition 334 Scientists. Site U1379. In Vannucchi, P, Ujiie, K, Stroncik, N, Malinverno, A, and the Expedition 334 Scientists, Proc IODP, 334: Tokyo (Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Management International, Inc) (2012).
Formolo M, Nuzzo M, Torres M, Solomon E. Expedition I Gas geochemical results from IODP Expedition 334: Influence of subsurface structure and fluid flow on gas composition. In: Proceedings of AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts) 2011.
Boyd JA, Woodcroft BJ, Tyson GW. GraftM: a tool for scalable, phylogenetically informed classification of genes within metagenomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:e59.
Singleton CM, McCalley CK, Woodcroft BJ, Boyd JA, Evans PN, Hodgkins SB, et al. Methanotrophy across a natural permafrost thaw environment. ISME J. 2018;12:2544–58.
Borrel G, Adam PS, McKay LJ, Chen LX, Sierra-García IN, Sieber C, et al. Wide diversity of methane and short-chain alkane metabolisms in uncultured archaea. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:603–13.
Hua Z-S, Wang YL, Evans PN, Qu YN, Goh KM, Rao YZ, et al. Insights into the ecological roles and evolution of methyl-coenzyme M reductase-containing hot spring Archaea. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1–11.
Cai M, et al. Diverse Asgard archaea including the novel phylum Gerdarchaeota participate in organic matter degradation. Science China Life Sciences, (2020).
Konstantinidis KT, Rosselló-Móra R, Amann R. Uncultivated microbes in need of their own taxonomy. ISME J. 2017;11:2399–406.
Hahn CJ, Laso-Pérez R, Vulcano F, Vaziourakis KM, Stokke R, Steen IH, et al. “Candidatus Ethanoperedens,” a thermophilic genus of Archaea mediating the anaerobic oxidation of ethane. mBio. 2020;11:e00600–00620.
Rastogi S, Liberles DA. Subfunctionalization of duplicated genes as a transition state to neofunctionalization. BMC Evolut Biol. 2005;5:28.
Hug LA, Baker BJ, Anantharaman K, Brown CT, Probst AJ, Castelle CJ, et al. A new view of the tree of life. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1:16048.
Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:1925–7.
Skennerton CT, Chourey K, Iyer R, Hettich RL, Tyson GW, Orphan VJ. Methane-fueled syntrophy through extracellular electron transfer: uncovering the genomic traits conserved within diverse bacterial partners of anaerobic methanotrophic archaea. mBio. 2017;8:e00530–00517.
Beulig F, Røy H, McGlynn SE, Jørgensen BB. Cryptic CH4 cycling in the sulfate–methane transition of marine sediments apparently mediated by ANME-1 archaea. ISME J. 2019;13:250–62.
Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Waite DW, Rinke C, Skarshewski A, Chaumeil PA, et al. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:996–1004.
Dombrowski N, Teske AP, Baker BJ. Expansive microbial metabolic versatility and biodiversity in dynamic Guaymas Basin hydrothermal sediments. Nat Commun. 2018;9:4999.
Dong X, Greening C, Rattray JE, Chakraborty A, Chuvochina M, Mayumi D, et al. Metabolic potential of uncultured bacteria and archaea associated with petroleum seepage in deep-sea sediments. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1816.
Brown CT, Olm MR, Thomas BC, Banfield JF. Measurement of bacterial replication rates in microbial communities. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34:1256–63.
Greening C, Biswas A, Carere CR, Jackson CJ, Taylor MC, Stott MB, et al. Genomic and metagenomic surveys of hydrogenase distribution indicate H2 is a widely utilised energy source for microbial growth and survival. ISME J. 2016;10:761–77.
Shimoyama T, Kato S, Ishii SI, Watanabe K. Flagellum mediates symbiosis. Science. 2009;323:1574–1574.
Valentine DL, Reeburgh WS. New perspectives on anaerobic methane oxidation: minireview. Environ Microbiol. 2000;2:477–84.
Vannucchi P, Ujiie K, Stroncik N, the IESP. IODP Expedition 334: An investigation of the sedimentary record, fluid flow and state of stress on top of the seismogenic zone of an erosive subduction margin. Sci Dril. 2013;15:23–30.
Torres ME, Muratli JM, Solomon EA Data report: minor element concentrations in pore fluids from the CRISP-A transect drilled during Expedition 334. In: Proceeding sof IODP | Volume) 2014.
Riedinger N, Torres ME, Screaton E, Solomon EA, Kutterolf S, Schindlbeck‐Belo J, et al. Interplay of subduction tectonics, sedimentation, and carbon cycling. Geochem, Geophys, Geosyst. 2019;20:4939–55.
Andrews S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ 2010.
Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–20.
Gruber-Vodicka HR, Seah BKB, Pruesse E. phyloFlash: rapid small-subunit rRNA profiling and targeted assembly from metagenomes. mSystems. 2020;5:e00920–00920.
Li DH, Liu CM, Luo RB, Sadakane K, Lam TW. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:1674–6.
Wu YW, Simmons BA, Singer SW. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:605–7.
Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–55.
Seah BK, Gruber-Vodicka HR. gbtools: interactive visualization of metagenome bins in R. Front. Microbiol. 2015;6:1451.
Bushnell B. BBMap: a fast, accurate, splice-aware aligner. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA (US) (2014).
Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19:455–77.
Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–9.
Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Forslund K, Cook H, Heller D, Walter MC, et al. eggNOG 4.5: a hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D286–D293.
Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Morishima K. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J Mol Biol. 2016;428:726–31.
Kanehisa M, Goto S, Sato Y, Furumichi M, Tanabe M. KEGG for integration and interpretation of large-scale molecular data sets. Nucleic Acids Research. 2011;40:D109–D114.
Garcia PS, Jauffrit F, Grangeasse C. Brochier-Armanet C. GeneSpy, a user-friendly and flexible genomic context visualizer. Bioinformatics. 2018;35:329–31.
Badalamenti JP, Summers ZM, Chan CH, Gralnick JA, Bond DR. Isolation and genomic characterization of ‘Desulfuromonas soudanensis WTL’, a metal-and electrode-respiring bacterium from anoxic deep subsurface brine. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:913.
Hyatt D, Chen GL, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinform. 2010;11:119.
Hernsdorf AW, Amano Y, Miyakawa K, Ise K, Suzuki Y, Anantharaman K, et al. Potential for microbial H2 and metal transformations associated with novel bacteria and archaea in deep terrestrial subsurface sediments. ISME J. 2017;11:1915–29.
Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun. 2018;9:5114.
Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2015;12:59–60.
Sorek R, Zhu YW, Creevey CJ, Francino MP, Bork P, Rubin EM. Genome-wide experimental determination of barriers to horizontal gene transfer. Science. 2007;318:1449–52.
Campbell JH, O'Donoghue P, Campbell AG, Schwientek P, Sczyrba A, Woyke T, et al. UGA is an additional glycine codon in uncultured SR1 bacteria from the human microbiota. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:5540–5.
Eren AM, Esen ÖC, Quince C, Vineis JH, Morrison HG, Sogin ML, et al. Anvi’o: an advanced analysis and visualization platformfor ‘omics data. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1319.
Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–7.
Capella-Gutierrez S, Silla-Martinez JM, Gabaldon T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1972–3.
Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evolut. 2015;32:268–74.
Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods. 2017;14:587–9.
Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol Biol Evolut. 2018;35:518–22.
Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389–402.
Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evolut. 2013;30:772–80.
Okonechnikov K, Golosova O, Fursov M, Team U. Unipro UGENE: a unified bioinformatics toolkit. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1166–7.
Matheus Carnevali PB, Schulz F, Castelle CJ, Kantor RS, Shih PM, Sharon I, et al. Hydrogen-based metabolism as an ancestral trait in lineages sibling to the Cyanobacteria. Nat Commun. 2019;10:463.
Kessler AJ, Chen YJ, Waite DW, Hutchinson T, Koh S, Popa ME, et al. Bacterial fermentation and respiration processes are uncoupled in anoxic permeable sediments. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:1014–23.
R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing.). R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria (2011).
Acknowledgements
This study uses samples and data provided by the IODP. We are grateful to all scientists and crew members of IODP Expedition 334, whose efforts made the samples available. We acknowledge computational support from the University of Delaware Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Core Facility and the use of the BIOMIX computing cluster was made possible through funding from Delaware INBRE (NIGMS P20GM103446), the State of Delaware, and the Delaware Biotechnology Institute. Comments from the anonymous reviewers have greatly improved the quality of this manuscript. This work was funded by the WM Keck Foundation (to JFB).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RZ and JFB conceived and designed this study. RZ performed the microbiology data collection and analysis. RZ and JFB interpreted the results and wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, R., Biddle, J.F. Helarchaeota and co-occurring sulfate-reducing bacteria in subseafloor sediments from the Costa Rica Margin. ISME COMMUN. 1, 25 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43705-021-00027-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43705-021-00027-x
This article is cited by
-
Asgard archaea modulate potential methanogenesis substrates in wetland soil
Nature Communications (2024)
-
The majority of microorganisms in gas hydrate-bearing subseafloor sediments ferment macromolecules
Microbiome (2023)
-
Evolutionary ecology of microbial populations inhabiting deep sea sediments associated with cold seeps
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Comparison of prokaryotes between Mount Everest and the Mariana Trench
Microbiome (2022)
-
Asgard archaea in saline environments
Extremophiles (2022)