Abstract
The comparative biology of aging leverages the remarkable diversity in aging rates and lifespans across species to uncover naturally evolved adaptations that promote longevity, disease resistance and injury resilience. The beauty of comparative biology is that it discovers adaptations that evolved outside of the protected laboratory environment, shaped by natural selection under real-world pressures. In this Review, we outline key approaches in comparative biology of aging studies, including the study of public mechanisms, which are shared between species, and private mechanisms, which are species-specific. Additionally, we present insights gained through high-throughput omics technologies—including genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics and metabolomics—and illustrate how these findings advance our understanding of how to ameliorate the hallmarks of aging, enhance cancer resistance and improve regeneration, with a focus on mammals. Finally, we offer practical guidance for designing and interpreting comparative studies aimed at understanding and translating longevity mechanisms.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout






Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zhao, Y., Seluanov, A. & Gorbunova, V. Revelations about aging and disease from unconventional vertebrate model organisms. Annu. Rev. Genet. 55, 135–159 (2021).
Partridge, L. & Gems, D. Mechanisms of aging: public or private? Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 165–175 (2002).
Tacutu, R. et al. Human Ageing Genomic Resources: new and updated databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D1083–D1090 (2018).
Phillips, K. A. et al. Why primate models matter. Am. J. Primatol. 76, 801–827 (2014).
Kolora, S. R. R. et al. Origins and evolution of extreme life span in Pacific Ocean rockfishes. Science 374, 842–847 (2021).
Gorbunova, V., Bozzella, M. J. & Seluanov, A. Rodents for comparative aging studies: from mice to beavers. Age 30, 111–119 (2008).
Gorbunova, V., Seluanov, A., Zhang, Z., Gladyshev, V. N. & Vijg, J. Comparative genetics of longevity and cancer: insights from long-lived rodents. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 531–540 (2014).
O’Neill, D. G., Church, D. B., McGreevy, P. D., Thomson, P. C. & Brodbelt, D. C. Longevity and mortality of owned dogs in England. Vet. J. 198, 638–643 (2013).
Healy, K. et al. Ecology and mode-of-life explain lifespan variation in birds and mammals. Proc. Biol. Sci. 281, 20140298 (2014).
Gorbunova, V., Seluanov, A. & Kennedy, B. K. The world goes bats: living longer and tolerating viruses. Cell Metab. 32, 31–43 (2020).
Nussey, D. H., Froy, H., Lemaitre, J.-F., Gaillard, J.-M. & Austad, S. N. Senescence in natural populations of animals: widespread evidence and its implications for bio-gerontology. Ageing Res. Rev. 12, 214–225 (2013).
Breed, G. A., Vermeulen, E. & Corkeron, P. Extreme longevity may be the rule not the exception in balaenid whales. Sci. Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adq3086 (2024).
Mayne, B., Berry, O., Davies, C., Farley, J. & Jarman, S. A genomic predictor of lifespan in vertebrates. Sci. Rep. 9, 17866 (2019).
Li, C. Z. et al. Epigenetic predictors of species maximum life span and other life-history traits in mammals. Sci. Adv. 10, eadm7273 (2024).
George, J. C. et al. in The Bowhead Whale (eds George, J. C. & Thewissen, J. G. M.) 309–322 (Academic Press, 2021).
Vincze, O. et al. Cancer risk across mammals. Nature 601, 263–267 (2022).
Cotton, C. J. Skeletal muscle mass and composition during mammalian hibernation. J. Exp. Biol. 219, 226–234 (2016).
Liu, C. et al. A towering genome: experimentally validated adaptations to high blood pressure and extreme stature in the giraffe. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe9459 (2021).
Kuparinen, A., Yeung, E. & Hutchings, J. A. Correlation between body size and longevity: new analysis and data covering six taxonomic classes of vertebrates. Acta Oecol. 119, 103917 (2023).
Speakman, J. R. Body size, energy metabolism and lifespan. J. Exp. Biol. 208, 1717–1730 (2005).
Austad, S. N. & Fischer, K. E. Mammalian aging, metabolism, and ecology: evidence from the bats and marsupials. J. Gerontol. 46, B47–B53 (1991).
Weichhart, T. mTOR as regulator of lifespan, aging, and cellular senescence: a mini-review. Gerontology 64, 127–134 (2018).
Papadopoli, D. et al. mTOR as a central regulator of lifespan and aging. F1000Res. 8, F1000 Faculty Rev-998 (2019).
Felsenstein, J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125, 1–15 (1985).
Martins, E. P. & Hansen, T. F. Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am. Nat. 149, 646–667 (1997).
Symonds, M. R. E. & Blomberg, S. P. in Modern Phylogenetic Comparative Methods and Their Application in Evolutionary Biology: Concepts and Practice (ed. Garamszegi, L. Z.) 105–130 (Springer, 2014).
López-Otín, C., Blasco, M. A., Partridge, L., Serrano, M. & Kroemer, G. Hallmarks of aging: an expanding universe. Cell 186, 243–278 (2023).
Li, Y. & De Magalhães, J. P. Accelerated protein evolution analysis reveals genes and pathways associated with the evolution of mammalian longevity. Age 35, 301–314 (2013).
Jobson, R. W., Nabholz, B. & Galtier, N. An evolutionary genome scan for longevity-related natural selection in mammals. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 840–847 (2010).
Wirthlin, M. et al. Parrot genomes and the evolution of heightened longevity and cognition. Curr. Biol. 28, 4001–4008 (2018).
Yu, Z. et al. Comparative analyses of aging-related genes in long-lived mammals provide insights into natural longevity. Innovation 2, 100108 (2021).
Treaster, S. et al. Convergent genomics of longevity in rockfishes highlights the genetics of human life span variation. Sci. Adv. 9, eadd2743 (2023).
Seim, I. et al. Genome analysis reveals insights into physiology and longevity of the Brandt’s bat Myotis brandtii. Nat. Commun. 4, 2212 (2013).
Toren, D. et al. Gray whale transcriptome reveals longevity adaptations associated with DNA repair and ubiquitination. Aging Cell 19, e13158 (2020).
Ma, S. et al. Cell culture-based profiling across mammals reveals DNA repair and metabolism as determinants of species longevity. eLife 5, e19130 (2016).
Tyshkovskiy, A. et al. Distinct longevity mechanisms across and within species and their association with aging. Cell 186, 2929–2949 (2023).
Kulaga, A. Y. et al. Machine learning analysis of longevity-associated gene expression landscapes in mammals. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 1073 (2021).
Lu, J. Y. et al. Comparative transcriptomics reveals circadian and pluripotency networks as two pillars of longevity regulation. Cell Metab. 34, 836–856 (2022).
Malik, A. et al. Genome maintenance and bioenergetics of the long-lived hypoxia-tolerant and cancer-resistant blind mole rat, Spalax: a cross-species analysis of brain transcriptome. Sci. Rep. 6, 38624 (2016).
Huang, Z., Whelan, C. V., Dechmann, D. & Teeling, E. C. Genetic variation between long-lived versus short-lived bats illuminates the molecular signatures of longevity. Aging 12, 15962–15977 (2020).
Fushan, A. A. et al. Gene expression defines natural changes in mammalian lifespan. Aging Cell 14, 352–365 (2015).
Takasugi, M., Yoshida, Y., Nonaka, Y. & Ohtani, N. Gene expressions associated with longer lifespan and aging exhibit similarity in mammals. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, 7205–7219 (2023).
Ma, S. et al. Organization of the mammalian metabolome according to organ function, lineage specialization, and longevity. Cell Metab. 22, 332–343 (2015).
Wan, Q.-L. et al. Uric acid induces stress resistance and extends the life span through activating the stress response factor DAF-16/FOXO and SKN-1/NRF2. Aging 12, 2840–2856 (2020).
Mota-Martorell, N. et al. Methionine metabolism is down-regulated in heart of long-lived mammals. Biology 11, 1821 (2022).
Mota-Martorell, N., Jové, M., Berdún, R. & Pamplona, R. Plasma methionine metabolic profile is associated with longevity in mammals. Commun. Biol. 4, 725 (2021).
Viltard, M. et al. The metabolomic signature of extreme longevity: naked mole rats versus mice. Aging 11, 4783–4800 (2019).
Sun, L., Sadighi Akha, A. A., Miller, R. A. & Harper, J. M. Life-span extension in mice by preweaning food restriction and by methionine restriction in middle age. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 64, 711–722 (2009).
Richie, J. P. Jr. et al. Methionine restriction increases blood glutathione and longevity in F344 rats. FASEB J. 8, 1302–1307 (1994).
Lee, B. C. et al. Methionine restriction extends lifespan of Drosophila melanogaster under conditions of low amino-acid status. Nat. Commun. 5, 3592 (2014).
Mitchell, S. J. et al. Nicotinamide improves aspects of healthspan, but not lifespan, in mice. Cell Metab. 27, 667–676 (2018).
Mitchell, T. W., Buffenstein, R. & Hulbert, A. J. Membrane phospholipid composition may contribute to exceptional longevity of the naked mole-rat (Heterocephalus glaber): a comparative study using shotgun lipidomics. Exp. Gerontol. 42, 1053–1062 (2007).
Galván, I. et al. Long lifespans have evolved with long and monounsaturated fatty acids in birds. Evolution 69, 2776–2784 (2015).
Bozek, K. et al. Lipidome determinants of maximal lifespan in mammals. Sci. Rep. 7, 5 (2017).
Gonzalez-Covarrubias, V. et al. Lipidomics of familial longevity. Aging Cell 12, 426–434 (2013).
Wallner, S. & Schmitz, G. Plasmalogens the neglected regulatory and scavenging lipid species. Chem. Phys. Lipids 164, 573–589 (2011).
Peters, A., Delhey, K., Nakagawa, S., Aulsebrook, A. & Verhulst, S. Immunosenescence in wild animals: meta-analysis and outlook. Ecol. Lett. 22, 1709–1722 (2019).
Hilton, H. G. et al. Single-cell transcriptomics of the naked mole-rat reveals unexpected features of mammalian immunity. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000528 (2019).
Emmrich, S. et al. Characterization of naked mole-rat hematopoiesis reveals unique stem and progenitor cell patterns and neotenic traits. EMBO J. 41, e109694 (2022).
He, Z. et al. Cross-species comparison illuminates the importance of iron homeostasis for splenic anti-immunosenescence. Aging Cell 22, e13982 (2023).
Morandini, F. et al. ATAC-clock: an aging clock based on chromatin accessibility. Geroscience 46, 1789–1806 (2024).
Rossi, D. J. et al. Cell intrinsic alterations underlie hematopoietic stem cell aging. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 9194–9199 (2005).
Emmrich, S. et al. Ectopic cervical thymi and no thymic involution until midlife in naked mole rats. Aging Cell 20, e13477 (2021).
Lin, T. D. et al. Evolution of T cells in the cancer-resistant naked mole-rat. Nat. Commun. 15, 3145 (2024).
Izraelson, M. et al. Distinct organization of adaptive immunity in the long-lived rodent Spalax galili. Nat. Aging 1, 179–189 (2021).
Moreno Santillán, D. D. et al. Large-scale genome sampling reveals unique immunity and metabolic adaptations in bats. Mol. Ecol. 30, 6449–6467 (2021).
Jebb, D. et al. Six reference-quality genomes reveal evolution of bat adaptations. Nature 583, 578–584 (2020).
Tian, S. et al. Comparative analyses of bat genomes identify distinct evolution of immunity in Old World fruit bats. Sci. Adv. 9, eadd0141 (2023).
Deguine, J. & Barton, G. M. MyD88: a central player in innate immune signaling. F1000Prime Rep. 6, 97 (2014).
Cagan, A. et al. Somatic mutation rates scale with lifespan across mammals. Nature 604, 517–524 (2022).
Zhang, L. et al. Maintenance of genome sequence integrity in long- and short-lived rodent species. Sci. Adv. 7, eabj3284 (2021).
MacRae, S. L. et al. Comparative analysis of genome maintenance genes in naked mole rat, mouse, and human. Aging Cell 14, 288–291 (2015).
Tian, X. et al. SIRT6 is responsible for more efficient DNA double-strand break repair in long-lived species. Cell 177, 622–638 (2019).
Mao, Z. et al. SIRT6 promotes DNA repair under stress by activating PARP1. Science 332, 1443–1446 (2011).
MacRae, S. L. et al. DNA repair in species with extreme lifespan differences. Aging 7, 1171–1182 (2015).
Zhang, G. et al. Comparative analysis of bat genomes provides insight into the evolution of flight and immunity. Science 339, 456–460 (2013).
Vazquez, J. M., Kraft, M. & Lynch, V. J. A CDKN2C retroduplication in Bowhead whales is associated with the evolution of extremely long lifespans and alerted cell cycle dynamics. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.07.506958 (2022).
Firsanov, D. et al. DNA repair and anti-cancer mechanisms in the longest-living mammal: the bowhead whale. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.07.539748 (2023).
Zou, L. & Elledge, S. J. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA–ssDNA complexes. Science 300, 1542–1548 (2003).
Maréchal, A. & Zou, L. DNA damage sensing by the ATM and ATR kinases. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a012716 (2013).
Zhou, X. et al. Beaver and naked mole rat genomes reveal common paths to longevity. Cell Rep. 32, 107949 (2020).
Sahm, A. et al. The Greenland shark (Somniosus microcephalus) genome provides insights into extreme longevity. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.09.611499 (2024).
Quesada, V. et al. Giant tortoise genomes provide insights into longevity and age-related disease. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 87–95 (2019).
Lowe, R. et al. Ageing-associated DNA methylation dynamics are a molecular readout of lifespan variation among mammalian species. Genome Biol. 19, 22 (2018).
Bertucci-Richter, E. M. & Parrott, B. B. The rate of epigenetic drift scales with maximum lifespan across mammals. Nat. Commun. 14, 7731 (2023).
Wilkinson, G. S. et al. DNA methylation predicts age and provides insight into exceptional longevity of bats. Nat. Commun. 12, 1615 (2021).
Crofts, S. J. C., Latorre-Crespo, E. & Chandra, T. DNA methylation rates scale with maximum lifespan across mammals. Nat. Aging 4, 27–32 (2024).
Horvath, S., Zhang, J., Haghani, A., Lu, A. T. & Fei, Z. Fundamental equations linking methylation dynamics to maximum lifespan in mammals. Nat. Commun. 15, 8093 (2024).
Morandini, F., Seluanov, A. & Gorbunova, V. Slow and steady lives the longest. Nat. Aging 4, 7–9 (2024).
Haluza, Y. et al. Axolotl epigenetic clocks offer insights into the nature of negligible senescence. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.09.611397 (2024).
Morandini, F. et al. Transposable element 5mC methylation state of blood cells predicts age and disease. Nat. Aging https://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-024-00757-2 (2025).
Mariner, B. L. et al. DNA methylation of transposons pattern aging differences across a diverse cohort of dogs from the Dog Aging Project. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.08.617286 (2024).
Yamaguchi, S. et al. Characterization of an active LINE-1 in the naked mole-rat genome. Sci. Rep. 11, 5725 (2021).
Kim, E. B. et al. Genome sequencing reveals insights into physiology and longevity of the naked mole rat. Nature 479, 223–227 (2011).
Liu, W. et al. Large-scale across species transcriptomic analysis identifies genetic selection signatures associated with longevity in mammals. EMBO J. 42, e112740 (2023).
Ke, Z. et al. Translation fidelity coevolves with longevity. Aging Cell 16, 988–993 (2017).
Azpurua, J. et al. Naked mole-rat has increased translational fidelity compared with the mouse, as well as a unique 28S ribosomal RNA cleavage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 17350–17355 (2013).
Swovick, K. et al. Interspecies differences in proteome turnover kinetics are correlated with life spans and energetic demands. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 20, 100041 (2021).
Rodriguez, K. A., Edrey, Y. H., Osmulski, P., Gaczynska, M. & Buffenstein, R. Altered composition of liver proteasome assemblies contributes to enhanced proteasome activity in the exceptionally long-lived naked mole-rat. PLoS ONE 7, e35890 (2012).
Pickering, A. M., Lehr, M. & Miller, R. A. Lifespan of mice and primates correlates with immunoproteasome expression. J. Clin. Invest. 125, 2059–2068 (2015).
Rodriguez, K. A. et al. Determinants of rodent longevity in the chaperone-protein degradation network. Cell Stress Chaperones 21, 453–466 (2016).
Pride, H. et al. Long-lived species have improved proteostasis compared to phylogenetically-related shorter-lived species. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 457, 669–675 (2015).
Mota-Martorell, N. et al. Gene expression and regulatory factors of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) complex 1 predict mammalian longevity. Geroscience 42, 1157–1173 (2020).
Wang, L., Harris, T. E., Roth, R. A. & Lawrence, J. C. Jr. PRAS40 regulates mTORC1 kinase activity by functioning as a direct inhibitor of substrate binding. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 20036–20044 (2007).
Sancak, Y. et al. PRAS40 is an insulin-regulated inhibitor of the mTORC1 protein kinase. Mol. Cell 25, 903–915 (2007).
Azpurua, J. et al. IGF1R levels in the brain negatively correlate with longevity in 16 rodent species. Aging 5, 304–314 (2013).
Kawamura, Y. et al. Cellular senescence induction leads to progressive cell death via the INK4a–RB pathway in naked mole-rats. EMBO J. 42, e111133 (2023).
Chee, W.-Y. et al. β-catenin-promoted cholesterol metabolism protects against cellular senescence in naked mole-rat cells. Commun. Biol. 4, 357 (2021).
Attaallah, A. et al. A pro longevity role for cellular senescence. Geroscience 42, 867–879 (2020).
Montazid, S. et al. Adult stem cell activity in naked mole rats for long-term tissue maintenance. Nat. Commun. 14, 8484 (2023).
Udroiu, I. & Sgura, A. Rates of erythropoiesis in mammals and their relationship with lifespan and hematopoietic stem cells aging. Biogerontology 20, 445–456 (2019).
Remot, F. et al. Decline in telomere length with increasing age across nonhuman vertebrates: a meta-analysis. Mol. Ecol. 31, 5917–5932 (2022).
Voituron, Y., Guillaume, O., Dumet, A., Zahn, S. & Criscuolo, F. Temperature-independent telomere lengthening with age in the long-lived human fish (Proteus anguinus). Proc. Biol. Sci. 290, 20230503 (2023).
Foley, N. M. et al. Growing old, yet staying young: the role of telomeres in bats’ exceptional longevity. Sci. Adv. 4, eaao0926 (2018).
Athar, F. et al. Limited cell-autonomous anticancer mechanisms in long-lived bats. Nat. Commun. 16, 4125 (2025).
Seluanov, A. et al. Telomerase activity coevolves with body mass not lifespan. Aging Cell 6, 45–52 (2007).
Seluanov, A. et al. Distinct tumor suppressor mechanisms evolve in rodent species that differ in size and lifespan. Aging Cell 7, 813–823 (2008).
Adwan Shekhidem, H. et al. Telomeres and longevity: a cause or an effect? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 3233 (2019).
Tricola, G. M. et al. The rate of telomere loss is related to maximum lifespan in birds. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 373, 20160445 (2018).
Dobson, F. S., Schull, Q. & Criscuolo, F. Two aspects of longevity are associated with rates of loss of telomeres in birds. Ecol. Evol. 12, e9364 (2022).
Domínguez-de-Barros, A. et al. An approach to the effects of longevity, sexual maturity, and reproduction on telomere length and oxidative stress in different Psittacidae species. Front. Genet. 14, 1156730 (2023).
Pepke, M. L. & Eisenberg, D. T. A. Accounting for phylogenetic relatedness in cross-species analyses of telomere shortening rates. Exp. Results 1, e11 (2020).
Whittemore, K., Vera, E., Martínez-Nevado, E., Sanpera, C. & Blasco, M. A. Telomere shortening rate predicts species life span. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 15122–15127 (2019).
Aledo, J. C., Li, Y., De Magalhães, J. P., Ruíz‐Camacho, M. & Pérez‐Claros, J. A. Mitochondrially encoded methionine is inversely related to longevity in mammals. Aging Cell 10, 198–207 (2011).
Mota-Martorell, N. et al. Low abundance of NDUFV2 and NDUFS4 subunits of the hydrophilic complex I domain and VDAC1 predicts mammalian longevity. Redox Biol. 34, 101539 (2020).
Gredilla, R., Sánchez-Román, I., Gómez, A., López-Torres, M. & Barja, G. Mitochondrial base excision repair positively correlates with longevity in the liver and heart of mammals. Geroscience 42, 653–665 (2020).
Pollard, A. K. et al. A comparison of the mitochondrial proteome and lipidome in the mouse and long-lived pipistrelle bats. Aging 11, 1664–1685 (2019).
Nicholatos, J. W. et al. Cellular energetics and mitochondrial uncoupling in canine aging. Geroscience 41, 229–242 (2019).
Hua, X., Cowman, P., Warren, D. & Bromham, L. Longevity is linked to mitochondrial mutation rates in rockfish: a test using Poisson regression. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 2633–2645 (2015).
Harper, J. M. et al. Fibroblasts from long-lived bird species are resistant to multiple forms of stress. J. Exp. Biol. 214, 1902–1910 (2011).
Pickering, A. M., Lehr, M., Kohler, W. J., Han, M. L. & Miller, R. A. Fibroblasts from longer-lived species of primates, rodents, bats, carnivores, and birds resist protein damage. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 70, 791–799 (2015).
Munro, D., Baldy, C., Pamenter, M. E. & Treberg, J. R. The exceptional longevity of the naked mole-rat may be explained by mitochondrial antioxidant defenses. Aging Cell 18, e12916 (2019).
Csiszar, A. et al. Testing the oxidative stress hypothesis of aging in primate fibroblasts: is there a correlation between species longevity and cellular ROS production? J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 67, 841–852 (2012).
Baird, L. & Dinkova-Kostova, A. T. The cytoprotective role of the Keap1–Nrf2 pathway. Arch. Toxicol. 85, 241–272 (2011).
Lewis, K. N. et al. Regulation of Nrf2 signaling and longevity in naturally long-lived rodents. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3722–3727 (2015).
Schmidt, H., Hangmann, J., Shams, I., Avivi, A. & Hankeln, T. Molecular evolution of antioxidant and hypoxia response in long-lived, cancer-resistant blind mole rats: the Nrf2–Keap1 pathway. Gene 577, 293–298 (2016).
Takasugi, M. et al. CD44 correlates with longevity and enhances basal ATF6 activity and ER stress resistance. Cell Rep. 42, 113130 (2023).
Zhang, Q. et al. Genomic expansion of Aldh1a1 protects beavers against high metabolic aldehydes from lipid oxidation. Cell Rep. 37, 109965 (2021).
Xia, C. & Møller, A. P. Long-lived birds suffer less from oxidative stress. Avian Res. 9, 41 (2018).
Chionh, Y. T. et al. High basal heat-shock protein expression in bats confers resistance to cellular heat/oxidative stress. Cell Stress Chaperones 24, 835–849 (2019).
Galaris, D., Barbouti, A. & Pantopoulos, K. Iron homeostasis and oxidative stress: an intimate relationship. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 1866, 118535 (2019).
Protchenko, O. et al. Iron chaperone poly rC binding protein 1 protects mouse liver from lipid peroxidation and steatosis. Hepatology 73, 1176–1193 (2021).
Nair, N. U. et al. Cross-species identification of cancer resistance-associated genes that may mediate human cancer risk. Sci. Adv. 8, eabj7176 (2022).
Tian, X. et al. Evolution of telomere maintenance and tumour suppressor mechanisms across mammals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 373, 20160443 (2018).
Hua, R. et al. Experimental evidence for cancer resistance in a bat species. Nat. Commun. 15, 1401 (2024).
Manov, I. et al. Pronounced cancer resistance in a subterranean rodent, the blind mole-rat, Spalax: in vivo and in vitro evidence. BMC Biol. 11, 91 (2013).
Gorbunova, V. et al. Cancer resistance in the blind mole rat is mediated by concerted necrotic cell death mechanism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 19392–19396 (2012).
Zhao, Y. et al. Transposon-triggered innate immune response confers cancer resistance to the blind mole rat. Nat. Immunol. 22, 1219–1230 (2021).
Qin, X.-Q. et al. Interferon-β gene therapy inhibits tumor formation and causes regression of established tumors in immune-deficient mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 14411–14416 (1998).
Glaberman, S., Bulls, S. E., Vazquez, J. M., Chiari, Y. & Lynch, V. J. Concurrent evolution of antiaging gene duplications and cellular phenotypes in long-lived turtles. Genome Biol. Evol. 13, evab244 (2021).
Nasser, N. J. et al. Alternatively spliced Spalax heparanase inhibits extracellular matrix degradation, tumor growth, and metastasis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 2253–2258 (2009).
Dredge, K. et al. PG545, a dual heparanase and angiogenesis inhibitor, induces potent anti-tumour and anti-metastatic efficacy in preclinical models. Br. J. Cancer 104, 635–642 (2011).
de Boer, C. et al. Mechanism-based heparanase inhibitors reduce cancer metastasis in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2203167119 (2022).
Takasugi, M. et al. Naked mole-rat very-high-molecular-mass hyaluronan exhibits superior cytoprotective properties. Nat. Commun. 11, 2376 (2020).
Seluanov, A. et al. Hypersensitivity to contact inhibition provides a clue to cancer resistance of naked mole-rat. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 19352–19357 (2009).
Tian, X. et al. High-molecular-mass hyaluronan mediates the cancer resistance of the naked mole rat. Nature 499, 346–349 (2013).
Tian, X. et al. INK4 locus of the tumor-resistant rodent, the naked mole rat, expresses a functional p15/p16 hybrid isoform. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 1053–1058 (2015).
Zhang, Z. et al. Increased hyaluronan by naked mole-rat Has2 improves healthspan in mice. Nature 621, 196–205 (2023).
Fatima, I. et al. Skin aging in long-lived naked mole-rats is accompanied by increased expression of longevity-associated and tumor suppressor genes. J. Invest. Dermatol. 142, 2853–2863 (2022).
Tollis, M., Schneider-Utaka, A. K. & Maley, C. C. The evolution of human cancer gene duplications across mammals. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 2875–2886 (2020).
Baines, C., Meitern, R., Kreitsberg, R. & Sepp, T. Comparative study of the evolution of cancer gene duplications across fish. Evol. Appl. 15, 1834–1845 (2022).
Huang, Z., Jebb, D. & Teeling, E. C. Blood miRNomes and transcriptomes reveal novel longevity mechanisms in the long-lived bat, Myotis myotis. BMC Genomics 17, 906 (2016).
Yun, M. H. Changes in regenerative capacity through lifespan. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16, 25392–25432 (2015).
Seifert, A. W. et al. Skin shedding and tissue regeneration in African spiny mice (Acomys). Nature 489, 561–565 (2012).
Harn, H. I.-C. et al. Symmetry breaking of tissue mechanics in wound induced hair follicle regeneration of laboratory and spiny mice. Nat. Commun. 12, 2595 (2021).
Brant, J. O., Yoon, J. H., Polvadore, T., Barbazuk, W. B. & Maden, M. Cellular events during scar-free skin regeneration in the spiny mouse, Acomys. Wound Repair Regen. 24, 75–88 (2016).
Maden, M. Optimal skin regeneration after full thickness thermal burn injury in the spiny mouse, Acomys cahirinus. Burns 44, 1509–1520 (2018).
Jiang, T.-X., Harn, H. I.-C., Ou, K.-L., Lei, M. & Chuong, C.-M. Comparative regenerative biology of spiny (Acomys cahirinus) and laboratory (Mus musculus) mouse skin. Exp. Dermatol. 28, 442–449 (2019).
Tomasso, A., Koopmans, T., Lijnzaad, P., Bartscherer, K. & Seifert, A. W. An ERK-dependent molecular switch antagonizes fibrosis and promotes regeneration in spiny mice (Acomys). Sci. Adv. 9, eadf2331 (2023).
Koopmans, T. et al. Ischemic tolerance and cardiac repair in the spiny mouse (Acomys). NPJ Regen. Med. 6, 78 (2021).
Peng, H. et al. Adult spiny mice (Acomys) exhibit endogenous cardiac recovery in response to myocardial infarction. NPJ Regen. Med. 6, 74 (2021).
Qi, Y. et al. Functional heart recovery in an adult mammal, the spiny mouse. Int. J. Cardiol. 338, 196–203 (2021).
Okamura, D. M. et al. Spiny mice activate unique transcriptional programs after severe kidney injury regenerating organ function without fibrosis. iScience 24, 103269 (2021).
Maden, M. et al. Perfect chronic skeletal muscle regeneration in adult spiny mice, Acomys cahirinus. Sci. Rep. 8, 8920 (2018).
Nogueira-Rodrigues, J. et al. Rewired glycosylation activity promotes scarless regeneration and functional recovery in spiny mice after complete spinal cord transection. Dev. Cell 57, 440–450 (2022).
Streeter, K. A. et al. Molecular and histologic outcomes following spinal cord injury in spiny mice, Acomys cahirinus. J. Comp. Neurol. 528, 1535–1547 (2020).
Athar, F. et al. African spiny mice show resistance to DMBA/TPA-induced squamous carcinogenesis with distinct benign tumor profile. Protein Cell https://doi.org/10.1093/procel/pwaf024 (2025).
Gawriluk, T. R. et al. Complex tissue regeneration in mammals is associated with reduced inflammatory cytokines and an influx of T cells. Front. Immunol. 11, 1695 (2020).
Brant, J. O., Lopez, M.-C., Baker, H. V., Barbazuk, W. B. & Maden, M. A comparative analysis of gene expression profiles during skin regeneration in Mus and Acomys. PLoS ONE 10, e0142931 (2015).
Brant, J. O. et al. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of dermal wound healing reveals de novo skeletal muscle regeneration in Acomys cahirinus. PLoS ONE 14, e0216228 (2019).
Simkin, J. et al. Tissue-resident macrophages specifically express Lactotransferrin and Vegfc during ear pinna regeneration in spiny mice. Dev. Cell 59, 496–516 (2024).
Cyr, J. L. et al. Regeneration-competent and -incompetent murids differ in neutrophil quantity and function. Integr. Comp. Biol. 59, 1138–1149 (2019).
Hui, S. P. et al. Zebrafish regulatory T cells mediate organ-specific regenerative programs. Dev. Cell 43, 659–672 (2017).
Gawriluk, T. R. et al. Comparative analysis of ear-hole closure identifies epimorphic regeneration as a discrete trait in mammals. Nat. Commun. 7, 11164 (2016).
Grigoryan, E. N. & Markitantova, Y. V. Tail and spinal cord regeneration in urodelean amphibians. Life 14, 594 (2024).
Martínez, D. E. Rejuvenation of the disposable soma: repeated injury extends lifespan in an asexual annelid. Exp. Gerontol. 31, 699–704 (1996).
Nagai, H. et al. Highly regenerative species-specific genes improve age-associated features in the adult Drosophila midgut. BMC Biol. 22, 157 (2024).
Dai, X. et al. Regeneration leads to global tissue rejuvenation in aging sexual planarians. Nat. Aging 5, 780–798 (2025).
Perez, K. et al. DNA repair-deficient premature aging models display accelerated epigenetic age. Aging Cell 23, e14058 (2024).
De Magalhães, J. P. & Costa, J. A database of vertebrate longevity records and their relation to other life-history traits. J. Evol. Biol. 22, 1770–1774 (2009).
Acknowledgements
Research in the laboratories of V.G. and A.S. is supported by grants from the US National Institute on Aging, the Impetus Grant, the Hevolution Foundation, the Michael Antonov Foundation and the Milky Way Research Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.R., F.M., S.J.K., A.S. and V.G. participated in the writing of this review. C.R. conceptualized and drew the original figures.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
V.G. is a scientific advisor to DoNotAge, Matrix Bio, Genflow Biosciences, Elysium, BellSant and WndrHLTH. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Aging thanks Jean-François Lemaître, Dario Riccardo Valenzano and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Rechsteiner, C., Morandini, F., Kim, S.J. et al. Unlocking longevity through the comparative biology of aging. Nat Aging 5, 1686–1703 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-025-00945-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-025-00945-8


