Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Stem cell aging

Seeing is believing: old clones die young

Nature Aging volume 3, pages 371–373 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

The ability of adult neural stem cells to produce new neurons (neurogenesis) declines markedly during aging, but exactly how this occurs is largely unknown. Using sophisticated in vivo imaging, a study in Nature Aging shows that aging affects several steps of neurogenesis — most notably, increasing the death of newborn clones.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Aging affects neurogenesis dynamics.

References

  1. Navarro Negredo, P., Yeo, R. W. & Brunet, A. Cell Stem Cell 27, 202–223 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuhn, H. G., Toda, T. & Gage, F. H. J. Neurosci. 38, 10401–10410 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu, Y. et al. Nat. Aging, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-023-00370-9 (2023).

  4. Ben Abdallah, N. M., Slomianka, L., Vyssotski, A. L. & Lipp, H. P. Neurobiol. Aging 31, 151–161 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonaguidi, M. A. et al. Cell 145, 1142–1155 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Encinas, J. M. et al. Cell Stem Cell 8, 566–579 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Harris, L. et al. Cell Stem Cell 28, 863–876 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ibrayeva, A. et al. Cell Stem Cell 28, 955–966 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Bottes, S. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 225–233 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pilz, G. A. et al. Science 359, 658–662 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Trinchero, M. F. et al. Cell Rep. 21, 1129–1139 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Morgenstern, N. A., Lombardi, G. & Schinder, A. F. J. Physiol. 586, 3751–3757 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bast, L. et al. Cell Rep. 25, 3231–3240 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Obernier, K. et al. Cell Stem Cell 22, 221–234 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gengatharan, A. et al. Cell 184, 709–722 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We apologize for not being able to cite much primary literature because of space limits. This work was supported by P01AG036695 (A.B.) and Stanford Medical Scientist Training Program grant T32-GM007365 (O.Y.Z.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Olivia Y. Zhou & Anne Brunet

  2. Stanford Biophysics Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Olivia Y. Zhou

  3. Stanford Medical Scientist Training Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Olivia Y. Zhou

  4. Glenn Laboratories for the Biology of Aging, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Anne Brunet

Authors
  1. Olivia Y. Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anne Brunet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Brunet.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, O.Y., Brunet, A. Seeing is believing: old clones die young. Nat Aging 3, 371–373 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-023-00394-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-023-00394-1

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing