Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Elder abuse prevalence and risk factors: findings from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging

Nature Aging volume 2, pages 784–795 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Elder abuse (EA) is a pervasive problem with serious consequences. Previous population-based EA risk factor research has largely used cross-sectional designs that limit causal inferences, or agency records to identify victims, which threatens external validity. Based on a national, prospective, population-based cohort sample of older adults (n = 23,468) over a 3-year period from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging, the current study sought to estimate the prevalence of EA and identify risk and protective factors. Past-year prevalence of any EA was 10.0%. Older adults with greater vulnerability related to physical, cognitive and mental health, childhood maltreatment and shared living were at higher EA risk, while social support was protective against EA. Older adults identifying as Black or reporting financial need were at heightened EA risk. This longitudinal, population-based study advances our understanding of EA risk/protective factors across several domains and informs the development of EA prevention strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Please note that due to privacy and ethical/legal issues for the CLSA participants, data are only available from the CLSA (https://www.clsa-elcv.ca/) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to de-identified CLSA data.

Code availability

Custom code or mathematical algorithms were not used in the current study. However, please see Supplementary Information Appendix A for the SPSS-generated syntax underlying the analyses in this study.

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Elder abuse surveillance: uniform definitions and recommended core data elements. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/ea_book_revised_2016.pdf. Accessed 5 January 2021.

  2. 2015 White House Conference on Aging. Final report. https://whitehouseconferenceonaging.gov/2015-whcoa-final-report.pdf. Accessed 5 January 2021.

  3. World Health Organization. World report on ageing and health. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/186463/1/9789240694811_eng.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 6 January 2021.

  4. National Reserach Council. Elder Mistreatment: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation in an Aging America (eds. R. J. Bonnie & R. B. Wallace) (National Academies Press, 2003).

  5. Yon, Y., Mikton, C. R., Gassoumis, Z. D. & Wilber, K. H. Elder abuse prevalence in community settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob. Health 5, e147–e156 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pillemer, K., Burnes, D., Riffin, C. & Lachs, M. S. Elder abuse: global situation, risk factors, and prevention strategies. Gerontologist 56, S194–S205 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Yunus, R. M., Hairi, N. N. & Choo, W. Y. Consequences of elder abuse and neglect: a systematic review of observational studies. Trauma Violence Abuse 20, 197–213 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dong, X. Q. Elder abuse: systematic review and implications for practice. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 63, 1214–1238 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lachs, M. S., Williams, C. S., O’brien, S., Pillemer, K. A. & Charlson, M. E. The mortality of elder mistreatment. JAMA 280, 428–432 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dong, X. & Wang, B. Incidence of elder abuse in a US Chinese population: findings from the longitudinal cohort PINE study. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 72, S95–S101 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Dong, X. Associations between the differential definitions of elder mistreatment and suicidal ideation outcomes in US Chinese older adults: do the definitions matter? J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 72, S82–S89 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mouton, C. P., Rodabough, R. J., Rovi, S. L., Brzyski, R. G. & Katerndahl, D. A. Psychosocial effects of physical and verbal abuse in postmenopausal women. Ann. Fam. Med. 8, 206–213 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Fisher, B. S., Zink, T. & Regan, S. L. Abuses against older women: prevalence and health effects. J. Interpers. Violence 26, 254–268 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lachs, M. S., Williams, C., O’Brien, S., Hurst, L. & Horwitz, R. Risk factors for reported elder abuse and neglect: a nine-year observational cohort study. Gerontologist 37, 469–474 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dong, X., Simon, M., Beck, T. & Evans, D. Decline in cognitive function and elder mistreatment: findings from the Chicago Health and Aging Project. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 22, 598–605 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pillemer, K. & Finkelhor, D. The prevalence of elder abuse: a random sample survey. Gerontologist 28, 51–57 (1988).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Acierno, R. et al. Prevalence and correlates of emotional, physical, sexual, and financial abuse and potential neglect in the United States: the National Elder Mistreatment Study. Am. J. Public Health 100, 292–297 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Laumann, E. O., Leitsch, S. A. & Waite, L. J. Elder mistreatment in the United States: prevalence estimates from a nationally representative study. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 63, S248–S254 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Burnes, D. et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for elder abuse and neglect in the community: a population‐based study. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 63, 1906–1912 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Peterson, J. C. et al. Financial exploitation of older adults: a population-based prevalence study. J. Gen. Intern Med. 29, 1615–1623 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Chang, E. S. & Levy, B. R. High prevalence of elder abuse during the COVID-19 pandemic: risk and resilience factors. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 29, 1152–1159 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Burnes, D. et al. Exploring risk of elder abuse revictimization: development of a model to inform community response interventions. J. Appl. Gerontol. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464820933432 (2020).

  23. Pillemer, K., Burnes, D. & MacNeil, A. Investigating the connection between ageism and elder mistreatment. Nat. Aging 1,159–164 (2021).

  24. McDonald, L. & Thomas, C. Elder abuse through a life course lens. Int. Psychogeriatr. 25, 1235–1243 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. McDonald, L. The mistreatment of older Canadians: findings from the 2015 national prevalence study. J. Elder Abuse Negl. 30, 176–208 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen M. & Fu, Y. Adverse childhood experiences: are they associated with greater risk of elder abuse victimization? J. Interpers. violence. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211028328 (2021).

  27. Asyraf, M. et al. The association between elder abuse and childhood adversity: a study of older adults in Malaysia. PLoS ONE 16, e0254717 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Glendenning, F. What is elder abuse and neglect? in The mistreatment of elderly people (eds. P. Decalmor & F. Glendenning) 1–34 (Sage, 1993).

  29. Statistics Canada 2021. Population estimates on July 1, by age and sex. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1710000501. Accessed 15 November 2021.

  30. Acierno, R. Elder mistreatment: epidemiological assessment methodology. In Elder Mistreatment: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation in an Aging America (eds. R. J. Bonnie & R. B. Wallace) 259–302 (National Academies Press, 2003).

  31. Storey, J. E. Risk factors for elder abuse and neglect: a review of the literature. Aggress. Violent Behav. 50, 101339 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ogle, C. M., Rubin, D. C. & Siegler, I. Cumulative exposure to traumatic events in older adults. Aging Ment. Health 18, 316–325 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Burnes, D., Pillemer, K. & Lachs, M. S. Elder abuse severity: a critical but understudied dimension of victimization for clinicians and researchers. Gerontologist 57, 745–56. (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rickwood, D. J. & Braithwaite, V. A. Social–psychological factors affecting help-seeking for emotional problems. Soc. Sci. Med. 39, 563–572 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kahlon, M. K. et al. Effect of layperson-delivered, empathy-focused program of telephone calls on loneliness, depression, and anxiety among adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 78, 616–622 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hoyumpa G, et al. Medical student-led social phone calls with elder mistreatment victims: changes in loneliness, depression, and perspectives of aging. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17713 (2022).

  37. Beach, S. R., Schulz, R., Castle, N. G. & Rosen, J. Financial exploitation and psychological mistreatment among older adults: differences between African Americans and non-African Americans in a population-based survey. Gerontologist 50, 744–757 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Burnes, D., Hancock, D. W., Eckenrode, J., Lachs, M. S. & Pillemer, K. Estimated incidence and factors associated with risk of elder mistreatment in New York State. JAMA Netw. Open 4, e2117758 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Yon, Y., Mikton, C., Gassoumis, Z. D. & Wilber, K. H. The prevalence of self-reported elder abuse among older women in community settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma Violence Abuse 20, 245–259 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Brozowski, K. & Hall, D. R. Aging and risk: physical and sexual abuse of elders in Canada. J. Interpers. Violence 25, 1183–1199 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Podnieks, E. National survey on abuse of the elderly in Canada. J. Elder. Abuse Negl. 4, 5–8 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Beach, S. R. et al. Using audio computer-assisted self-interviewing and interactive voice response to measure elder mistreatment in older adults: Feasibility and effects on prevalence estimates. J. Off. Stat. 26, 507–533 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Raina, P. et al. The Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). Can. J. Aging 28, 221–229 (2009).

  44. Raina, P., Wolfson, C., Kirkland, S. A. & Griffith, L. E. The Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA): Report on Health and Aging in Canada. Retrieved from https://ifa.ngo/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/clsa_report_en_final_web.pdf (2018).

  45. Raina, P. et al. Cohort profile: the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). Int. J. Epidemiol. 48, 1752–1753 (2019).

  46. Raina, P., Wolfson, C. & Kirkland, S. Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging: protocol. https://clsa-elcv.ca/doc/511. Accessed 5 January 2021.

  47. Burnes, D. et al. Prevalence of financial fraud and scams among older adults in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Public Health 107, e13–e31 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Fillenbaum, G. G. & Smyer, M. A. The development, validity, and reliability of the OARS multidimensional functional assessment questionnaire. J. Gerontol. 36, 428–434 (1981).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Subramanian, S. V., Huijts, T. & Avendano, M. Self-reported health assessments in the 2002 World Health Survey: how do they correlate with education? Bull. World Health Organ. 88, 131–138 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Schmidt, M. Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test: a handbook (Western Psychological Services, 1996).

  51. Teng, E. The Mental Alternations Test. Clin. Neuropsychologist 9, 287 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ahmad, F., Jhajj, A. K., Stewart, D. E., Burghardt, M. & Bierman, A. S. Single-item measures of self-rated mental health: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv. Res. 14, 398 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Andresen, E. M., Malmgren, J. A., Carter, W. B. & Patrick, D. L. Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale). Am. J. Prev. Med. 10, 77–84 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J. & Griffin, S. The satisfaction with life scale. J. Pers. Assess. 49, 71–75 (1985).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Prins, A. et al. The Primary Care PTSD screen (PC-PTSD): development and operating characteristics. Primary Care Psychiatry 9, 9–14 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Walsh, C. A. et al. Measurement of victimization in adolescence: development and validation of the Childhood Experiences of Violence Questionnaire. Child Abuse Negl. 32, 1037–1057 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Tanaka, M. et al. Preliminary evaluation of the Childhood Experiences of Violence Questionnaire Short Form. J. Interpers. Violence 27, 396–407 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Felitti, V. J. et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. Am. J. Prev. Med. 14, 245–258 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Sherbourne, C. D. & Stewart, A. L. The MOS social support survey. Soc. Sci. Med 32, 705–714 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was made possible using the data/biospecimens collected by the CLSA. Funding for the CLSA is provided by the Government of Canada through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research under grant reference LSA 94473 and the Canada Foundation for Innovation, as well as the provinces of Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, Quebec, Ontario, Manitoba, Alberta and British Columbia. This research was conducted using the CLSA Baseline Tracking Dataset version 3.5, Comprehensive Dataset version 4.1, Follow-up 1 Tracking Dataset version 2.1, Comprehensive Dataset version 3.0 under application ID 1906012. The CLSA is led by P. Raina, C. Wolfson and S. Kirkland. The opinions expressed in this paper are the authors’ own and do not reflect the views of the CLSA. This project received funding from the Public Health Agency of Canada (4500415616, to D.B.). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Toronto, Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    David Burnes & Lynn McDonald

  2. Cornell University, College of Human Ecology, Ithaca, NY, USA

    Karl Pillemer

  3. Division of Geriatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA

    Tony Rosen

  4. Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA

    Mark S. Lachs

Authors
  1. David Burnes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karl Pillemer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tony Rosen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mark S. Lachs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lynn McDonald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

D.B. was involved in study conceptualization, data cleaning, data analysis, findings interpretation and manuscript writing/editing. K.P., T.R. and M.S.L. were involved in study conceptualization, findings interpretation and manuscript writing/editing. L.M. was involved in study instrument development, findings interpretation and manuscript writing/editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Burnes.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Aging thanks Ronald (E) Acierno, Kathleen Wilber, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Table 1 and SPSS data analysis code

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burnes, D., Pillemer, K., Rosen, T. et al. Elder abuse prevalence and risk factors: findings from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Nat Aging 2, 784–795 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-022-00280-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-022-00280-2

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing