Weak magnetic fields offer nearly lossless transmission of signals within biological tissue. Magnetic nanomaterials are capable of transducing magnetic fields into a range of biologically relevant signals in vitro and in vivo. These nanotransducers have recently enabled magnetic control of cellular processes, from neuronal firing and gene expression to programmed apoptosis. Effective implementation of magnetically controlled cellular signalling relies on careful tailoring of magnetic nanotransducers and magnetic fields to the responses of the intended molecular targets. This Primer discusses the versatility of magnetic modulation modalities and offers practical guidelines for selection of appropriate materials and field parameters, with a particular focus on applications in neuroscience. With recent developments in magnetic instrumentation and nanoparticle chemistries, including those that are commercially available, magnetic approaches promise to empower research aimed at connecting molecular and cellular signalling to physiology and behaviour in untethered moving subjects.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Bioelectronic Medicine Open Access 20 September 2023
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 1 digital issues and online access to articles
$99.00 per year
only $99.00 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Pankhurst, Q. A., Connolly, J., Jones, S. K. & Dobson, J. Applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 36, R167–R181 (2003).
Hergt, R., Dutz, S., Müller, R. & Zeisberger, M. Magnetic particle hyperthermia: nanoparticle magnetism and materials development for cancer therapy. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 18, S2919–S2934 (2006).
Huang, H., Delikanli, S., Zeng, H., Ferkey, D. M. & Pralle, A. Remote control of ion channels and neurons through magnetic-field heating of nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 602–606 (2010). This work is the first report of magneto-thermal stimulation of neural activity.
Chen, R., Romero, G., Christiansen, M. G., Mohr, A. & Anikeeva, P. Wireless magnetothermal deep brain stimulation. Science 347, 1477–1480 (2015). This work is the first report of magneto-thermal stimulation in the deep brain of a mouse.
Lee, J.-u. et al. Non-contact long-range magnetic stimulation of mechanosensitive ion channels in freely moving animals. Nat. Mater. 20, 1029–1036 (2021). This work is the first report of magneto-mechanical control of mouse behaviour.
George, M. S., Lisanby, S. H. & Sackeim, H. A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: applications in neuropsychiatry. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 56, 300–311 (1999).
Wassermann, E. M. & Lisanby, S. H. Therapeutic application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a review. Clin. Neurophysiol. 112, 1367–1377 (2001).
Silvanto, J., Cowey, A., Lavie, N. & Walsh, V. Striate cortex (V1) activity gates awareness of motion. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 143–144 (2005).
Fregni, F. & Pascual-Leone, A. Technology insight: noninvasive brain stimulation in neurology — perspectives on the therapeutic potential of rTMS and tDCS. Nat. Clin. Pract. Neurol. 3, 383–393 (2007).
Kobayashi, M. & Pascual-Leone, A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology. Lancet Neurol. 2, 145–156 (2003).
Hallett, M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain. Nature 406, 147–150 (2000).
Chen, R., Canales, A. & Anikeeva, P. Neural recording and modulation technologies. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 16093 (2017).
Christiansen, M. G., Senko, A. W. & Anikeeva, P. Magnetic strategies for nervous system control. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 42, 271–293 (2019).
Seo, D. et al. A mechanogenetic toolkit for interrogating cell signaling in space and time. Cell 165, 1507–1518 (2016).
Beaulieu, J.-M. & Gainetdinov, R. R. The physiology, signaling, and pharmacology of dopamine receptors. Pharmacol. Rev. 63, 182–217 (2011).
Snyder, S. H. Brain peptides as neurotransmitters. Science 209, 976–983 (1980).
Fonnum, F. Glutamate: a neurotransmitter in mammalian brain. J. Neurochemistry 42, 1–11 (1984).
Park, J. et al. In situ electrochemical generation of nitric oxide for neuronal modulation. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 690–697 (2020).
Park, J. et al. Electrochemical modulation of carbon monoxide-mediated cell signaling. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 20325–20330 (2021).
Tehovnik, E. J. Electrical stimulation of neural tissue to evoke behavioral responses. J. Neurosci. Methods 65, 1–17 (1996).
Clapham, D. E., Runnels, L. W. & Strübing, C. The TRP ion channel family. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 387–396 (2001).
Voets, T. et al. The principle of temperature-dependent gating in cold- and heat-sensitive TRP channels. Nature 430, 748–754 (2004).
Martinac, B. Mechanosensitive ion channels: molecules of mechanotransduction. J. Cell Sci. 117, 2449–2460 (2004).
Wang, N., Butler, J. P. & Ingber, D. E. Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science 260, 1124–1127 (1993).
Zhu, C., Bao, G. & Wang, N. Cell mechanics: mechanical response, cell adhesion, and molecular deformation. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2, 189–226 (2000).
Rivnay, J., Wang, H., Fenno, L., Deisseroth, K. & Malliaras, G. G. Next-generation probes, particles, and proteins for neural interfacing. Sci. Adv. 3, e1601649 (2017).
Rao, S. et al. Remotely controlled chemomagnetic modulation of targeted neural circuits. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 967–973 (2019). This work is the first report of chemomagnetic control of neural activity and mouse behaviour.
Golovin, Y. I. et al. Towards nanomedicines of the future: remote magneto-mechanical actuation of nanomedicines by alternating magnetic fields. J. Control. Rel. 219, 43–60 (2015).
Yue, K. et al. Magneto-electric nano-particles for non-invasive brain stimulation. PLoS ONE 7, e44040 (2012).
Guduru, R. et al. Magnetoelectric ‘spin’ on stimulating the brain. Nanomedicine 10, 2051–2061 (2015).
Kozielski, K. L. et al. Nonresonant powering of injectable nanoelectrodes enables wireless deep brain stimulation in freely moving mice. Sci. Adv. 7, eabc4189 (2021). This work presents the first application of nanoscale magnetoelectric coupling to control mouse behaviour.
Johnsen, S. & Lohmann, K. J. Magnetoreception in animals. Phys. Today 61, 29–35 (2008).
Rodgers, C. T. & Hore, P. J. Chemical magnetoreception in birds: the radical pair mechanism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 353–360 (2009).
Kirschvink, J. L., Walker, M. M. & Diebel, C. E. Magnetite-based magnetoreception. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11, 462–467 (2001).
Lohmann, K. J. & Johnsen, S. The neurobiology of magnetoreception in vertebrate animals. Trends Neurosci. 23, 153–159 (2000).
Park, J., Koehler, F., Varnavides, G., Antonini, M.-J. & Anikeeva, P. Influence of magnetic fields on electrochemical reactions of redox cofactor solutions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 18295–18302 (2021).
Hore, P. J. & Mouritsen, H. The radical-pair mechanism of magnetoreception. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 45, 299–344 (2016).
Barbic, M. Possible magneto-mechanical and magneto-thermal mechanisms of ion channel activation in magnetogenetics. eLife 8, e45807 (2019).
Brier, M. I. et al. Uncovering a possible role of reactive oxygen species in magnetogenetics. Sci. Rep. 10, 13096 (2020).
Hernández-Morales, M., Shang, T., Chen, J., Han, V. & Liu, C. Lipid oxidation induced by RF waves and mediated by ferritin iron causes activation of ferritin-tagged ion channels. Cell Rep. 30, 3250–3260.e7 (2020).
Field, S. B. & Bleehen, N. M. Hyperthermia in the treatment of cancer. Cancer Treat. Rev. 6, 63–94 (1979).
Wust, P. et al. Hyperthermia in combined treatment of cancer. Lancet Oncol. 3, 487–497 (2002).
Caterina, M. J. et al. The capsaicin receptor: a heat-activated ion channel in the pain pathway. Nature 389, 816–824 (1997).
Stanley, S. A. et al. Radio-wave heating of iron oxide nanoparticles can regulate plasma glucose in mice. Science 336, 604–608 (2012).
Hescham, S.-A. et al. Magnetothermal nanoparticle technology alleviates parkinsonian-like symptoms in mice. Nat. Commun. 12, 5569 (2021).
Munshi, R. et al. Magnetothermal genetic deep brain stimulation of motor behaviors in awake, freely moving mice. eLife 6, e27069 (2017). This work is the first report of magneto-thermal control of mouse behaviour.
Rosenfeld, D. et al. Transgene-free remote magnetothermal regulation of adrenal hormones. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz3734 (2020). This work is the first report of magneto-thermal control of endocrine signalling mediated by endogenous TRPV1 in genetically intact rats.
Luo, J., Shen, W. L. & Montell, C. TRPA1 mediates sensation of the rate of temperature change in Drosophila larvae. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 34–41 (2017).
Sebesta, C. et al. Subsecond multichannel magnetic control of select neural circuits in freely moving flies. Nat. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-022-01281-7 (2022). This work is the first demonstration of sub-second magneto-thermal control of behaviour mediated by ion channels responsive to temperature change rather than temperature threshold.
Yang, Y. D. et al. TMEM16A confers receptor-activated calcium-dependent chloride conductance. Nature 455, 1210–1215 (2008).
Cho, H. et al. The calcium-activated chloride channel anoctamin 1 acts as a heat sensor in nociceptive neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 1015–1021 (2012).
Maingret, F. et al. TREK-1 is a heat-activated background K+ channel. EMBO J. 19, 2483–2491 (2000).
Munshi, R., Qadri, S. M. & Pralle, A. Transient magnetothermal neuronal silencing using the chloride channel anoctamin 1 (TMEM16A). Front. Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00560 (2018).
Romero, G., Christiansen, M. G., Stocche Barbosa, L., Garcia, F. & Anikeeva, P. Localized excitation of neural activity via rapid magnetothermal drug release. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 6471–6478 (2016).
Park, J. et al. Remotely controlled proton generation for neuromodulation. Nano Lett. 20, 6535–6541 (2020).
Moon, J. et al. Magnetothermal multiplexing for selective remote control of cell signaling. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 2000577 (2020).
Smith, S. B., Finzi, L. & Bustamante, C. Direct mechanical measurements of the elasticity of single DNA molecules by using magnetic beads. Science 258, 1122–1126 (1992).
Kim, D.-H. et al. Biofunctionalized magnetic-vortex microdiscs for targeted cancer-cell destruction. Nat. Mater. 9, 165–171 (2010).
Gregurec, D. et al. Magnetic vortex nanodiscs enable remote magnetomechanical neural stimulation. ACS Nano 14, 8036–8045 (2020). This work is the first report of magneto-mechanical stimulation of neural activity.
Collier, C. et al. Wireless force-inducing neuronal stimulation mediated by high magnetic moment microdiscs. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 11, 2101826 (2022).
Mannix, R. J. et al. Nanomagnetic actuation of receptor-mediated signal transduction. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 36–40 (2008).
Dobson, J. Remote control of cellular behaviour with magnetic nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 139–143 (2008).
Tseng, P., Judy, J. W. & Di Carlo, D. Magnetic nanoparticle-mediated massively parallel mechanical modulation of single-cell behavior. Nat. Methods 9, 1113–1119 (2012).
Cho, M. H. et al. A magnetic switch for the control of cell death signalling in in vitro and in vivo systems. Nat. Mater. 11, 1038–1043 (2012).
Etoc, F. et al. Magnetogenetic control of protein gradients inside living cells with high spatial and temporal resolution. Nano Lett. 15, 3487–3494 (2015).
Yu, Y. et al. Remote and selective control of astrocytes by magnetomechanical stimulation. Adv. Sci. 9, e2104194 (2022).
Christiansen, M. G., Senko, A. W., Chen, R., Romero, G. & Anikeeva, P. Magnetically multiplexed heating of single domain nanoparticles. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 213103 (2014).
Christiansen, M. G., Howe, C. M., Bono, D. C., Perreault, D. J. & Anikeeva, P. Practical methods for generating alternating magnetic fields for biomedical research. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88, 084301 (2017).
Young, J. H., Wang, M.-T. & Brezovich, I. A. J. E. L. Frequency/depth-penetration considerations in hyperthermia by magnetically induced currents. IET J. 16, 358–359 (1980).
Bordelon, D. E. et al. Modified solenoid coil that efficiently produces high amplitude AC magnetic fields with enhanced uniformity for biomedical applications. IEEE Trans. Magn. 48, 47–52 (2012).
Müller, K. F. Berechnung der Induktivität von Spulen [German]. Arch. für Elektrotechnik 17, 336–353 (1926).
Irving, M. & Gottlieb, P. E. in Practical Transformer Handbook (eds Irving, M. & Gottlieb, P. E.) 1–24 (Newnes, 1998).
Blanchard, J. The history of electrical resonance. Bell Syst. Techn. J. 20, 415–433 (1941).
Ripka, P. Magnetic sensors and magnetometers. Meas. Sci. Technol. 13, 645–645 (2002).
Gavilán, H. et al. Magnetic nanoparticles and clusters for magnetic hyperthermia: optimizing their heat performance and developing combinatorial therapies to tackle cancer. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 11614–11667 (2021).
Fortin, J.-P. et al. Size-sorted anionic iron oxide nanomagnets as colloidal mediators for magnetic hyperthermia. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 2628–2635 (2007).
Nosrati, H. et al. New insight about biocompatibility and biodegradability of iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles: stereological and in vivo MRI monitor. Sci. Rep. 9, 7173 (2019).
Costa, C. et al. In vitro cytotoxicity of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles on neuronal and glial cells. Evaluation of nanoparticle interference with viability tests. J. Appl. Toxicol. 36, 361–372 (2016).
Nuzhina, J. V., Shtil, A. A., Prilepskii, A. Y. & Vinogradov, V. V. Preclinical evaluation and clinical translation of magnetite-based nanomedicines. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 54, 101282 (2019).
Li, Z., Tan, B., Allix, M., Cooper, A. I. & Rosseinsky, M. J. Direct coprecipitation route to monodisperse dual-functionalized magnetic iron oxide nanocrystals without size selection. Small 4, 231–239 (2008).
LaGrow, A. P. et al. Unravelling the growth mechanism of the co-precipitation of iron oxide nanoparticles with the aid of synchrotron X-ray diffraction in solution. Nanoscale 11, 6620–6628 (2019).
Andrés Vergés, M. et al. Uniform and water stable magnetite nanoparticles with diameters around the monodomain–multidomain limit. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 41, 134003 (2008).
Kemp, S. J., Ferguson, R. M., Khandhar, A. P. & Krishnan, K. M. Monodisperse magnetite nanoparticles with nearly ideal saturation magnetization. RSC Adv. 6, 77452–77464 (2016).
Jang, J.-t et al. Critical enhancements of MRI contrast and hyperthermic effects by dopant-controlled magnetic nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 1234–1238 (2009).
Xie, W. et al. Shape-, size- and structure-controlled synthesis and biocompatibility of iron oxide nanoparticles for magnetic theranostics. Theranostics 8, 3284–3307 (2018).
Kovalenko, M. V. et al. Fatty acid salts as stabilizers in size- and shape-controlled nanocrystal synthesis: the case of inverse spinel iron oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 6352–6353 (2007).
Zhao, Z. et al. Octapod iron oxide nanoparticles as high-performance T2 contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. Nat. Commun. 4, 2266 (2013).
Chen, R. et al. High-performance ferrite nanoparticles through nonaqueous redox phase tuning. Nano Lett. 16, 1345–1351 (2016).
Wu, K. et al. Investigation of commercial iron oxide nanoparticles: structural and magnetic property characterization. ACS Omega 6, 6274–6283 (2021).
Noh, S.-h et al. Nanoscale magnetism control via surface and exchange anisotropy for optimized ferrimagnetic hysteresis. Nano Lett. 12, 3716–3721 (2012).
Lee, S.-Y. & Harris, M. T. Surface modification of magnetic nanoparticles capped by oleic acids: characterization and colloidal stability in polar solvents. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 293, 401–408 (2006).
Dong, A. et al. A generalized ligand-exchange strategy enabling sequential surface functionalization of colloidal nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 998–1006 (2011).
Palma, S. I. C. J. et al. Effects of phase transfer ligands on monodisperse iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 437, 147–155 (2015).
Chan, N. et al. Multidentate block-copolymer-stabilized ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles with enhanced colloidal stability for magnetic resonance imaging. Biomacromolecules 15, 2146–2156 (2014).
Chen, R., Christiansen, M. G. & Anikeeva, P. Maximizing hysteretic losses in magnetic ferrite nanoparticles via model-driven synthesis and materials optimization. ACS Nano 7, 8990–9000 (2013).
Lu, C., Bhatt, L. R., Jun, H. Y., Park, S. H. & Chai, K. Y. Carboxyl–polyethylene glycol–phosphoric acid: a ligand for highly stabilized iron oxide nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 19806–19811 (2012).
Das, M. et al. Orthogonal biofunctionalization of magnetic nanoparticles via “clickable” poly(ethylene glycol) silanes: a “universal ligand” strategy to design stealth and target-specific nanocarriers. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 24652–24667 (2012).
Amstad, E., Gillich, T., Bilecka, I., Textor, M. & Reimhult, E. Ultrastable iron oxide nanoparticle colloidal suspensions using dispersants with catechol-derived anchor groups. Nano Lett. 9, 4042–4048 (2009).
Xu, C. et al. Dopamine as a robust anchor to immobilize functional molecules on the iron oxide shell of magnetic nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 9938–9939 (2004).
Zhang, L., Tong, S., Zhang, Q. & Bao, G. Lipid-encapsulated Fe3O4 nanoparticles for multimodal magnetic resonance/fluorescence imaging. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 3, 6785–6797 (2020).
Wang, F. et al. Profiling metal oxides with lipids: magnetic liposomal nanoparticles displaying DNA and proteins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 12063–12067 (2016).
Davis, H. C. et al. Nanoscale heat transfer from magnetic nanoparticles and ferritin in an alternating magnetic field. Biophys. J. 118, 1502–1510 (2020).
Lim, Y. et al. Magnetothermally activated nanometer-level modular functional group grafting of nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 21, 3649–3656 (2021).
Oz, Y., Arslan, M., Gevrek, T. N., Sanyal, R. & Sanyal, A. Modular fabrication of polymer brush coated magnetic nanoparticles: engineering the interface for targeted cellular imaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 19813–19826 (2016).
Mai, B. T. et al. Thermoresponsive iron oxide nanocubes for an effective clinical translation of magnetic hyperthermia and heat-mediated chemotherapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 5727–5739 (2019).
Guntnur, R. T. et al. On-demand chemomagnetic modulation of striatal neurons facilitated by hybrid magnetic nanoparticles. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2204732 (2022).
Loynachan, C. N. et al. Targeted magnetic nanoparticles for remote magnetothermal disruption of amyloid-β aggregates. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 4, 2100–2109 (2015).
Patsula, V. et al. Synthesis and modification of uniform PEG-neridronate-modified magnetic nanoparticles determines prolonged blood circulation and biodistribution in a mouse preclinical model. Sci. Rep. 9, 10765 (2019).
Lee, J.-H. et al. Magnetic nanoparticles for ultrafast mechanical control of inner ear hair cells. ACS Nano 8, 6590–6598 (2014).
Markaki, A. E. & Clyne, T. W. Magneto-mechanical stimulation of bone growth in a bonded array of ferromagnetic fibres. Biomaterials 25, 4805–4815 (2004).
Hu, B., El Haj, A. J. & Dobson, J. Receptor-targeted, magneto-mechanical stimulation of osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, 19276–19293 (2013).
Bidan, C. M. et al. Magneto-active substrates for local mechanical stimulation of living cells. Sci. Rep. 8, 1464 (2018).
Tay, Z. W. et al. Magnetic particle imaging-guided heating in vivo using gradient fields for arbitrary localization of magnetic hyperthermia therapy. ACS Nano 12, 3699–3713 (2018).
Tay, A. & Di Carlo, D. Magnetic nanoparticle-based mechanical stimulation for restoration of mechano-sensitive ion channel equilibrium in neural networks. Nano Lett. 17, 886–892 (2017).
Lisjak, D. & Mertelj, A. Anisotropic magnetic nanoparticles: a review of their properties, syntheses and potential applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 95, 286–328 (2018).
Matthews, B. D. et al. Ultra-rapid activation of TRPV4 ion channels by mechanical forces applied to cell surface β1 integrins. Integr. Biol. 2, 435–442 (2010).
Parreiras, S. O. & Martins, M. D. Effect of planar anisotropy in vortex configuration of micro-scale disks. Phys. Procedia 75, 1142–1149 (2015).
Ammar, M. et al. A quantitative analysis of magnetic vortices in permalloy nanoparticles characterized by electron holography. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320, e716–e719 (2008).
Yang, Y. et al. Stable vortex magnetite nanorings colloid: micromagnetic simulation and experimental demonstration. J. Appl. Phys. 111, 044303 (2012).
Kim, J.-w et al. Single-cell mechanogenetics using monovalent magnetoplasmonic nanoparticles. Nat. Protoc. 12, 1871–1889 (2017).
Vock, S. et al. Magnetic vortex observation in FeCo nanowires by quantitative magnetic force microscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 172409 (2014).
Coïsson, M. et al. Magnetic vortex chirality determination via local hysteresis loops measurements with magnetic force microscopy. Sci. Rep. 6, 29904 (2016).
Anand, M., Carrey, J. & Banerjee, V. Spin morphologies and heat dissipation in spherical assemblies of magnetic nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. B 94, 094425 (2016).
Aurélio, D. & Vejpravova, J. Understanding magnetization dynamics of a magnetic nanoparticle with a disordered shell using micromagnetic simulations. Nanomaterials 10, 1149 (2020).
Evans, R. F. L. et al. Atomistic spin model simulations of magnetic nanomaterials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 26, 103202 (2014).
Hergt, R. & Dutz, S. Magnetic particle hyperthermia — biophysical limitations of a visionary tumour therapy. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 311, 187–192 (2007).
Di Loreto, S. et al. Fifty hertz extremely low-frequency magnetic field exposure elicits redox and trophic response in rat-cortical neurons. J. Cell. Physiol. 219, 334–343 (2009).
Myrtill, S. Cell type specific redox status is responsible for diverse electromagnetic field effects. Curr. Med. Chem. 14, 1141–1152 (2007).
Khalil, W. K. B., Girgis, E., Emam, A. N., Mohamed, M. B. & Rao, K. V. Genotoxicity evaluation of nanomaterials: DNA damage, micronuclei, and 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine induced by magnetic doped CdSe quantum dots in male mice. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 24, 640–650 (2011).
Singh, N. et al. The role of iron redox state in the genotoxicity of ultrafine superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Biomaterials 33, 163–170 (2012).
Mai, T. & Hilt, J. Z. Magnetic nanoparticles: reactive oxygen species generation and potential therapeutic applications. J. Nanopart. Res. 19, 253 (2017).
Feng, Q. et al. Uptake, distribution, clearance, and toxicity of iron oxide nanoparticles with different sizes and coatings. Sci. Rep. 8, 2082 (2018).
Foroozandeh, P. & Aziz, A. A. Insight into cellular uptake and intracellular trafficking of nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 13, 339 (2018).
Middeldorp, J. & Hol, E. M. GFAP in health and disease. Prog. Neurobiol. 93, 421–443 (2011).
Ito, D. et al. Microglia-specific localisation of a novel calcium binding protein, Iba1. Mol. Brain Res. 57, 1–9 (1998).
Holness, C. & Simmons, D. Molecular cloning of CD68, a human macrophage marker related to lysosomal glycoproteins. Blood 81, 1607–1613 (1993).
Saxena, T. et al. The impact of chronic blood–brain barrier breach on intracortical electrode function. Biomaterials 34, 4703–4713 (2013).
Bressenot, A. et al. Assessment of apoptosis by immunohistochemistry to active caspase-3, active caspase-7, or cleaved PARP in monolayer cells and spheroid and subcutaneous xenografts of human carcinoma. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 57, 289–300 (2009).
Mickle, A. D. et al. A wireless closed-loop system for optogenetic peripheral neuromodulation. Nature 565, 361–365 (2019).
Li, J. et al. A tissue-like neurotransmitter sensor for the brain and gut. Nature 606, 94–101 (2022).
Mank, M. & Griesbeck, O. Genetically encoded calcium indicators. Chem. Rev. 108, 1550–1564 (2008).
Paredes, R. M., Etzler, J. C., Watts, L. T., Zheng, W. & Lechleiter, J. D. Chemical calcium indicators. Methods 46, 143–151 (2008).
Chen, T.-W. et al. Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature 499, 295–300 (2013).
Dana, H. et al. High-performance calcium sensors for imaging activity in neuronal populations and microcompartments. Nat. Methods 16, 649–657 (2019).
Zhang, Y. et al. jGCaMP8 fast genetically encoded calcium indicators. Janelia Res. Campus https://doi.org/10.25378/janelia.13148243.v1 (2020).
Wu, N., Nishioka, W. K., Derecki, N. C. & Maher, M. P. High-throughput-compatible assays using a genetically-encoded calcium indicator. Sci. Rep. 9, 12692 (2019).
Xu, Y., Zou, P. & Cohen, A. E. Voltage imaging with genetically encoded indicators. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 39, 1–10 (2017).
Emiliani, V., Cohen, A. E., Deisseroth, K. & Häusser, M. All-optical interrogation of neural circuits. J. Neurosci. 35, 13917–13926 (2015).
Chien, M.-P. et al. Photoactivated voltage imaging in tissue with an archaerhodopsin-derived reporter. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe3216 (2021).
Cho, Y. K. et al. Roadmap on neurophotonics. J. Opt. 18, 093007 (2016).
Deo, C. & Lavis, L. D. Synthetic and genetically encoded fluorescent neural activity indicators. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 50, 101–108 (2018).
FallahRad, M. et al. Electrophysiology equipment for reliable study of kHz electrical stimulation. J. Physiol. 597, 2131–2137 (2019).
Pashut, T. et al. Patch-clamp recordings of rat neurons from acute brain slices of the somatosensory cortex during magnetic stimulation. Front. Cell Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2014.00145 (2014).
Liu, J., Munshi, R., He, M., Parker, S. & Pralle, A. Deep brain magnetothermal silencing of dopaminergic neurons via endogenous TREK1 channels abolishes place preference in mice. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.12.487994 (2022).
Maeng, L. Y. et al. Probing neuro-endocrine interactions through remote magnetothermal adrenal stimulation. Front. Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.901108 (2022).
Schrödel, T., Prevedel, R., Aumayr, K., Zimmer, M. & Vaziri, A. Brain-wide 3D imaging of neuronal activity in Caenorhabditis elegans with sculpted light. Nat. Methods 10, 1013–1020 (2013).
Varshney, L. R., Chen, B. L., Paniagua, E., Hall, D. H. & Chklovskii, D. B. Structural properties of the Caenorhabditis elegans neuronal network. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1001066 (2011).
Muqit, M. M. K. & Feany, M. B. Modelling neurodegenerative diseases in Drosophila: a fruitful approach? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 237–243 (2002).
Ng, C.-H. et al. Parkin protects against LRRK2 G2019S mutant-induced dopaminergic neurodegeneration in Drosophila. J. Neurosci. 29, 11257 (2009).
Madisen, L. et al. A toolbox of Cre-dependent optogenetic transgenic mice for light-induced activation and silencing. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 793–802 (2012).
Silva, A. J. et al. Mutant mice and neuroscience: recommendations concerning genetic background. Neuron 19, 755–759 (1997).
Hunt, S. P., Pini, A. & Evan, G. Induction of c-fos-like protein in spinal cord neurons following sensory stimulation. Nature 328, 632–634 (1987).
Sagar, S. M., Sharp, F. R. & Curran, T. Expression of c-fos protein in brain: metabolic mapping at the cellular level. Science 240, 1328–1331 (1988).
Mohammed, A. I. et al. An integrative approach for analyzing hundreds of neurons in task performing mice using wide-field calcium imaging. Sci. Rep. 6, 20986 (2016).
Yang, G., Pan, F., Parkhurst, C. N., Grutzendler, J. & Gan, W.-B. Thinned-skull cranial window technique for long-term imaging of the cortex in live mice. Nat. Protoc. 5, 201–208 (2010).
Matsuzaki, M. & Ebina, T. Optical deep-cortex exploration in behaving rhesus macaques. Nat. Commun. 12, 4656 (2021).
Sekiguchi, K. J. et al. Imaging large-scale cellular activity in spinal cord of freely behaving mice. Nat. Commun. 7, 11450 (2016).
Cheng, Y.-T., Lett, K. M. & Schaffer, C. B. Surgical preparations, labeling strategies, and optical techniques for cell-resolved, in vivo imaging in the mouse spinal cord. Exp. Neurol. 318, 192–204 (2019).
Nelson, N. A., Wang, X., Cook, D., Carey, E. M. & Nimmerjahn, A. Imaging spinal cord activity in behaving animals. Exp. Neurol. 320, 112974 (2019).
Rakhilin, N. et al. An intravital window to image the colon in real time. Nat. Commun. 10, 5647 (2019).
Huang, Q. et al. Intravital imaging of mouse embryos. Science 368, 181–186 (2020).
Motegi, Y. et al. Confocal and multiphoton calcium imaging of the enteric nervous system in anesthetized mice. Neurosci. Res. 151, 53–60 (2020).
Gunaydin, LisaA. et al. Natural neural projection dynamics underlying social behavior. Cell 157, 1535–1551 (2014).
Won, S. M. et al. Recent advances in materials, devices, and systems for neural interfaces. Adv. Mater. 30, 1800534 (2018).
Fallegger, F., Schiavone, G. & Lacour, S. P. Conformable hybrid systems for implantable bioelectronic interfaces. Adv. Mater. 32, 1903904 (2020).
Schuerle, S., Dudani, J. S., Christiansen, M. G., Anikeeva, P. & Bhatia, S. N. Magnetically actuated protease sensors for in vivo tumor profiling. Nano Lett. 16, 6303–6310 (2016).
Calvo, A. C. & Azanza, Ma. J. Synaptic neurone activity under applied 50 Hz alternating magnetic fields. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Pharmacol. Toxicol. Endocrinol. 124, 99–107 (1999).
Moghadam, M. K., Firoozabadi, S. M. & Janahmadi, M. 50 Hz alternating extremely low frequency magnetic fields affect excitability, firing and action potential shape through interaction with ionic channels in snail neurones. Environmentalist 28, 341–347 (2008).
Lee, J.-H. et al. Artificial control of cell signaling and growth by magnetic nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 5698–5702 (2010).
Yoo, D., Lee, J.-H., Shin, T.-H. & Cheon, J. Theranostic magnetic nanoparticles. Acc. Chem. Res. 44, 863–874 (2011).
Harvey, B. K., Wang, Y. & Hoffer, B. J. Transgenic rodent models of Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neurochir. Suppl. 101, 89–92 (2008).
Perlmutter, J. S. & Mink, J. W. Deep brain stimulation. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 29, 229–257 (2006).
Szallasi, A. & Gunthorpe, J. M. Peripheral TRPV1 receptors as targets for drug development: new molecules and mechanisms. Curr. Pharm. Des. 14, 32–41 (2008).
Roth, B. L. DREADDs for neuroscientists. Neuron 89, 683–694 (2016).
Tye, K. M. et al. Dopamine neurons modulate neural encoding and expression of depression-related behaviour. Nature 493, 537–541 (2013).
Su, C.-L., Yen, P.-H., Cheng, C.-C. & Chiang, P.-H. Remote deep brain stimulation by transgene-free magnetomechanical approach. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.27.470141 (2021).
Riccio, A. et al. Essential role for TRPC5 in amygdala function and fear-related behavior. Cell 137, 761–772 (2009).
Gottlieb, P. et al. Revisiting TRPC1 and TRPC6 mechanosensitivity. Pflügers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 455, 1097–1103 (2008).
Cao, D.-S., Yu, S.-Q. & Premkumar, L. S. Modulation of transient receptor potential vanilloid 4-mediated membrane currents and synaptic transmission by protein kinase C. Mol. Pain https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8069-5-5 (2009).
Errico, C. et al. Ultrafast ultrasound localization microscopy for deep super-resolution vascular imaging. Nature 527, 499–502 (2015).
Abedi, M. H. et al. Ultrasound-controllable engineered bacteria for cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Commun. 13, 1585 (2022).
Szablowski, J. O., Bar-Zion, A. & Shapiro, M. G. Achieving spatial and molecular specificity with ultrasound-targeted biomolecular nanotherapeutics. Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 2427–2434 (2019).
Shahriari, D., Rosenfeld, D. & Anikeeva, P. Emerging frontier of peripheral nerve and organ interfaces. Neuron 108, 270–285 (2020).
Rao, M. & Gershon, M. D. The bowel and beyond: the enteric nervous system in neurological disorders. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 13, 517–528 (2016).
Caterina, M. J. & Julius, D. The vanilloid receptor: a molecular gateway to the pain pathway. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 487–517 (2001).
Coste, B. et al. Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically activated cation channels. Science 330, 55–60 (2010).
Singer, A. et al. Magnetoelectric materials for miniature, wireless neural stimulation at therapeutic frequencies. Neuron 107, 631–643.e5 (2020).
Nguyen, T. et al. In vivo wireless brain stimulation via non-invasive and targeted delivery of magnetoelectric nanoparticles. Neurotherapeutics 18, 2091–2106 (2021).
Pardo, M. et al. Size-dependent intranasal administration of magnetoelectric nanoparticles for targeted brain localization. Nanomedicine. 32, 102337 (2021).
Wang, P. et al. Colossal magnetoelectric effect in core–shell magnetoelectric nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 20, 5765–5772 (2020).
Khizroev, S. Technobiology’s enabler: the magnetoelectric nanoparticle. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a034207 (2019).
Åström, M., Diczfalusy, E., Martens, H. & Wårdell, K. Relationship between neural activation and electric field distribution during deep brain stimulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 62, 664–672 (2015).
Stanley, S. A. et al. Bidirectional electromagnetic control of the hypothalamus regulates feeding and metabolism. Nature 531, 647–650 (2016).
Wheeler, M. A. et al. Genetically targeted magnetic control of the nervous system. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 756–761 (2016).
Jutz, G., van Rijn, P., Santos Miranda, B. & Böker, A. Ferritin: a versatile building block for bionanotechnology. Chem. Rev. 115, 1653–1701 (2015).
Chasteen, N. D. & Harrison, P. M. Mineralization in ferritin: an efficient means of iron storage. J. Struct. Biol. 126, 182–194 (1999).
Stühn, L., Auernhammer, J. & Dietz, C. pH-depended protein shell dis- and reassembly of ferritin nanoparticles revealed by atomic force microscopy. Sci. Rep. 9, 17755 (2019).
Kilcoyne, S. H. & Cywinski, R. Ferritin: a model superparamagnet. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 140–144, 1466–1467 (1995).
Meister, M. Physical limits to magnetogenetics. eLife 5, e17210 (2016). This work is an example of a biophysics analysis that should accompany or precede the development of magnetic neuromodulation techniques.
Kole, K. et al. Assessing the utility of Magneto to control neuronal excitability in the somatosensory cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 23, 1044–1046 (2020).
Wang, G. et al. Revaluation of magnetic properties of magneto. Nat. Neurosci. 23, 1047–1050 (2020).
Robbins, M., Christensen, C. N., Kaminski, C. F. & Zlatic, M. Calcium imaging analysis — how far have we come? F1000Res. 10, 258–258 (2021).
Pnevmatikakis, E. A. Analysis pipelines for calcium imaging data. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 55, 15–21 (2019).
Qin, Z., Li, Y. & Gu, N. Progress in applications of Prussian blue nanoparticles in biomedicine. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 7, e1800347 (2018).
Nowicka-Jankowska, T. Some properties of isosbestic points. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 33, 2043–2050 (1971).
Terstappen, G. C., Meyer, A. H., Bell, R. D. & Zhang, W. Strategies for delivering therapeutics across the blood–brain barrier. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20, 362–383 (2021).
Dong, X. Current strategies for brain drug delivery. Theranostics 8, 1481–1493 (2018).
Kong, S. D. et al. Magnetic targeting of nanoparticles across the intact blood–brain barrier. J. Control. Rel. 164, 49–57 (2012).
Arruebo, M., Fernández-Pacheco, R., Ibarra, M. R. & Santamaría, J. Magnetic nanoparticles for drug delivery. Nano Today 2, 22–32 (2007).
Mody, V. V. et al. Magnetic nanoparticle drug delivery systems for targeting tumor. Appl. Nanosci. 4, 385–392 (2014).
Huang, J. et al. Magnetic nanoparticle facilitated drug delivery for cancer therapy with targeted and image-guided approaches. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 3818–3836 (2016).
Levitz, J. et al. Dual optical control and mechanistic insights into photoswitchable group II and III metabotropic glutamate receptors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E3546–E3554 (2017).
Ma, W. et al. Modular assembly of proteins on nanoparticles. Nat. Commun. 9, 1489 (2018).
Jin, G.-Z., Chakraborty, A., Lee, J.-H., Knowles, J. C. & Kim, H.-W. Targeting with nanoparticles for the therapeutic treatment of brain diseases. J. Tissue Eng. 11, 2041731419897460 (2020).
Malachowski, T. & Hassel, A. Engineering nanoparticles to overcome immunological barriers for enhanced drug delivery. Eng. Regen. 1, 35–50 (2020).
Sahay, G., Alakhova, D. Y. & Kabanov, A. V. Endocytosis of nanomedicines. J. Control. Rel. 145, 182–195 (2010).
Zhao, F. et al. Cellular uptake, intracellular trafficking, and cytotoxicity of nanomaterials. Small 7, 1322–1337 (2011).
Zhang, S., Gao, H. & Bao, G. Physical principles of nanoparticle cellular endocytosis. ACS Nano 9, 8655–8671 (2015).
Rennick, J. J., Johnston, A. P. R. & Parton, R. G. Key principles and methods for studying the endocytosis of biological and nanoparticle therapeutics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 266–276 (2021).
Patel, S. et al. Brief update on endocytosis of nanomedicines. Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 144, 90–111 (2019).
Singh, A. P., Biswas, A., Shukla, A. & Maiti, P. Targeted therapy in chronic diseases using nanomaterial-based drug delivery vehicles. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 4, 33 (2019).
Varnavides, G., Jermyn, A. S., Anikeeva, P. & Narang, P. Nonequilibrium phonon transport across nanoscale interfaces. Phys. Rev. B 100, 115402 (2019).
Dong, J. & Zink, J. I. Taking the temperature of the interiors of magnetically heated nanoparticles. ACS Nano 8, 5199–5207 (2014).
Yoo, D., Jeong, H., Noh, S.-H., Lee, J.-H. & Cheon, J. Magnetically triggered dual functional nanoparticles for resistance-free apoptotic hyperthermia. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 13047–13051 (2013).
Cao, S. et al. Transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) activation by arachidonic acid requires protein kinase A-mediated phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 5307–5322 (2018).
Martino, F., Perestrelo, A. R., Vinarský, V., Pagliari, S. & Forte, G. Cellular mechanotransduction: from tension to function. Front. Physiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00824 (2018).
Kefauver, J. M., Ward, A. B. & Patapoutian, A. Discoveries in structure and physiology of mechanically activated ion channels. Nature 587, 567–576 (2020).
The authors thank D. Bono, Y. J. Kim, K. Nagao and D. Rosenfeld for the fruitful discussions of magnetic instrumentation, magnetic nanomaterials chemistry and biological applications of magnetic modulation. P.A. and A.P. thank M. Shapiro, J. Cheon, J. Robinson, M. Christiansen and G. Varnavides for their insights into magneto-thermal modulation at the nanoscale.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Methods Primers thanks Gianni Ciofani and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
- Magnetic modulation
Control of cellular processes or animal behaviour by methods based on the application of magnetic fields.
- Transcranial magnetic stimulation
A non-invasive therapeutic and diagnostic method explored as a treatment for neurological and psychiatric conditions based on the electromagnetic induction of local currents in targeted brain regions by externally applied pulsed magnetic fields.
Devices to convert one type of signal into another. In this Primer, used to define nanoparticles converting magnetic field energy into other physical stimuli such as heat, force or electric fields.
Magnetic iron oxide or iron sulfide nanoparticles enclosed in a biomolecular membrane enabling magnetotactic bacteria to orient along the Earth’s magnetic field lines.
- Superparamagnetic nanoparticles
Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) whose magnetization in the absence of a magnetic field rotates freely resulting in net-zero magnetization of particle ensembles. Application of a weak magnetic field, however, endows these particles with magnetization response commensurate with magnetic properties of the material that the particles are composed of.
- Eddy currents
Electric current loops induced in a conductor surface by a changing magnetic field.
- Magneto-mechanical torque
A torque exerted when a magnetic object rotates around an axis to align its magnetic moment with the applied magnetic field direction.
Magnetic materials with high susceptibility to magnetization and the strength of the magnetizing applied field, in which magnetization persists after removal of the magnetic field.
Magnetic materials comprising two crystalline sublattices with opposing but not equal magnetic moments. In these materials, magnetization persists after the removal of the applied magnetic field, although its values are typically lower than that for ferromagnetic materials.
- Brownian relaxation
Magnetic relaxation due to rotational diffusion of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) in a liquid.
- Neél magnetization relaxation
Magnetic relaxation caused by the reorientation of the magnetization vector inside magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) without their physical rotation.
A technique that employs light as an external stimulus to control biological activity in cells genetically modified to express light-sensitive ion channels.
- Fibre photometry
A technique using an optical fibre to collect fluorescence from tissues in vivo frequently used in neuroscience to record fluorescence changes of activity indicators.
- Subthalamic nucleus
A brain region that is part of the basal ganglia in the subthalamus that is targeted in clinic to treat patients with Parkinson disease.
- Zona fasciculata
A middle region of the adrenal cortex responsible for the production of cortisol in humans and corticosterone in rodents.
- Nucleus accumbens
Brain region in the ventral striatum involved in processing of motivation, aversion, reward and learning.
Atomic lattice vibration waves carrying thermal energy.
About this article
Cite this article
Romero, G., Park, J., Koehler, F. et al. Modulating cell signalling in vivo with magnetic nanotransducers. Nat Rev Methods Primers 2, 92 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00170-2
This article is cited by
Bioelectronic Medicine (2023)
Elucidating Mechanotransduction Processes During Magnetomechanical Neuromodulation Mediated by Magnetic Nanodiscs
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering (2023)