Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Reanalysis: the forgotten sibling of reproducibility and replicability

Nature Reviews Methods Primers volume 2, Article number: 14 (2022) Cite this article

Subjects

Ensuring reproducibility and replicability has been an issue in many scientific disciplines in the past decade. Here, we discuss another ‘R’ that has not gotten enough airtime — reanalysis. We cover how open science and a focus on enabling reanalysis also make the goals of reproducibility and replicability easier to achieve.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Relationship between reproducibility, replicability and reanalysis.

References

  1. Plesser, H. E. Reproducibility vs. replicability: a brief history of a confused terminology. Front. Neuroinf. 11, 76 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker, M. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature 533, 452–454 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Errington, T. M., Denis, A., Perfito, N., Iorns, E. & Nosek, B. A. Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology. eLife 10, e67995 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Leong, H. S. et al. On the issue of transparency and reproducibility in nanomedicine. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 629–635 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Colavizza, G., Hrynaszkiewicz, I., Staden, I., Whitaker, K. & McGillivray, B. The citation advantage of linking publications to research data. PLoS ONE 15, e0230416 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim, Y. & Stanton, J. M. Institutional and individual influences on scientists’ data sharing practices. J. Comput. Sci. Educ. 3, 47–56 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Perrier, L., Blondal, E. & MacDonald, H. The views, perspectives, and experiences of academic researchers with data sharing and reuse: a meta-synthesis. PLoS ONE 15, e0229182 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Faria, M. et al. Revisiting cell–particle association in vitro: a quantitative method to compare particle performance. J. Control. Release 307, 355–367 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnston, S. T., Faria, M. & Crampin, E. J. Isolating the sources of heterogeneity in nano-engineered particle–cell interactions. J. R. Soc. Interface 17, 20200221 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Faria, M. et al. Minimum information reporting in bio–nano experimental literature. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 777–785 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

    Matthew Faria

  2. Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

    Steve Spoljaric & Frank Caruso

Authors
  1. Matthew Faria
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steve Spoljaric
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Frank Caruso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Caruso.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faria, M., Spoljaric, S. & Caruso, F. Reanalysis: the forgotten sibling of reproducibility and replicability. Nat Rev Methods Primers 2, 14 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00103-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00103-z

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing