Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting strategies use computer-aided processes to enable automated simultaneous spatial patterning of cells and/or biomaterials. These technologies are suitable for a broad range of biomedical applications owing to their capability to produce structurally sophisticated and functionally relevant tissue constructs. Extrusion-based 3D bioprinting strategies were among the first modalities developed and are now arguably the most widely used for producing 3D tissue constructs. These technologies have rapidly evolved over the past two decades, providing a powerful tool set for the biofabrication of tissues that can facilitate translational efforts in the field. In this Primer, we describe the methodology of 3D extrusion bioprinting, focusing on the selection of hardware, software and bioinks. We expand upon recent advances in 3D extrusion bioprinting by illustrating the key variations that promote its biofabrication abilities. Finally, we provide an outlook on possible future refinements of the technology.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Nature Communications Open Access 19 January 2023
Bio-Design and Manufacturing Open Access 01 September 2022
Scientific Reports Open Access 19 July 2022
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to Nature and 55 other Nature journal
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $99.00 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Guillemot, F., Mironov, V. & Nakamura, M. Bioprinting is coming of age: report from the international conference on bioprinting and biofabrication in bordeaux (3b′09). Biofabrication 2, 010201 (2010).
Groll, J. et al. Biofabrication: reappraising the definition of an evolving field. Biofabrication 8, 013001 (2016).
Landers, R., Hübner, U., Schmelzeisen, R. & Mülhaupt, R. Rapid prototyping of scaffolds derived from thermoreversible hydrogels and tailored for applications in tissue engineering. Biomaterials 23, 4437–4447 (2002).
Jiang, T., Munguia-Lopez, J. G., Flores-Torres, S., Kort-Mascort, J. & Kinsella, J. M. Extrusion bioprinting of soft materials: an emerging technique for biological model fabrication. Appl. Phys. Rev. 6, 011310 (2019).
Ozbolat, I. T. & Hospodiuk, M. Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting. Biomaterials 76, 321–343 (2016).
Ning, L. & Chen, X. A brief review of extrusion-based tissue scaffold bio-printing. Biotechnol. J. 12, 1600671 (2017).
Gao, G., Kim, B. S., Jang, J. & Cho, D.-W. Recent strategies in extrusion-based three-dimensional cell printing toward organ biofabrication. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 5, 1150–1169 (2019).
Ouyang, L., Highley, C. B., Rodell, C. B., Sun, W. & Burdick, J. A. 3D printing of shear-thinning hyaluronic acid hydrogels with secondary cross-linking. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2, 1743–1751 (2016).
Wilson, S. A., Cross, L. M., Peak, C. W. & Gaharwar, A. K. Shear-thinning and thermo-reversible nanoengineered inks for 3D bioprinting. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 43449–43458 (2017).
Murphy, S. V. & Atala, A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 773–785 (2014).
Moroni, L. et al. Biofabrication strategies for 3D in vitro models and regenerative medicine. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 21–37 (2018).
Murphy, S. V., De Coppi, P. & Atala, A. Opportunities and challenges of translational 3D bioprinting. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4, 370–380 (2019).
Heinrich, M. A. et al. 3D bioprinting: from benches to translational applications. Small 15, 1805510 (2019).
Levato, R. et al. From shape to function: the next step in bioprinting. Adv. Mater. 32, 1906423 (2020).
Peng, W., Unutmaz, D. & Ozbolat, I. T. Bioprinting towards physiologically relevant tissue models for pharmaceutics. Trends Biotechnol. 34, 722–732 (2016).
Moroni, L. et al. Biofabrication: a guide to technology and terminology. Trends Biotechnol. 36, 384–402 (2018).
Cui, X. et al. Advances in extrusion 3D bioprinting: a focus on multicomponent hydrogel-based bioinks. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 9, 1901648 (2020).
Schaffner, M., Rühs, P. A., Coulter, F., Kilcher, S. & Studart, A. R. 3D printing of bacteria into functional complex materials. Sci. Adv. 3, eaao6804 (2017).
Garciamendez-Mijares, C. E., Agrawal, P., García Martínez, G., Cervantes Juarez, E. & Zhang, Y. S. State-of-art affordable bioprinters: a guide for the DIY community. Apppl. Phys. Rev. 8, 031312 (2021).
Ravanbakhsh, H. et al. Emerging technologies in multi-material bioprinting. Adv. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202104730 (2021).
Wu, Y., Ravnic, D. J. & Ozbolat, I. T. Intraoperative bioprinting: repairing tissues and organs in a surgical setting. Trends Biotechnol. 38, 594–605 (2020).
Li, H., Cheng, F., Orgill, D. P., Yao, J. & Zhang, Y. S. Handheld bioprinting strategies for in situ wound-dressing. Essays Biochem. 65, 533–543 (2021).
Kosik-Kozioł, A. et al. 3D bioprinted hydrogel model incorporating β-tricalcium phosphate for calcified cartilage tissue engineering. Biofabrication 11, 035016 (2019).
Sithole, M. N. et al. A 3D bioprinted in situ conjugated-co-fabricated scaffold for potential bone tissue engineering applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 106, 1311–1321 (2018).
Qiu, K. et al. 3D printed organ models with physical properties of tissue and integrated sensors. Adv. Mater. Technol. 3, 1700235 (2018).
Haghiashtiani, G. et al. 3D printed patient-specific aortic root models with internal sensors for minimally invasive applications. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb4641 (2020).
Lee, A. et al. 3D bioprinting of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart. Science 365, 482 (2019).
Kamio, T., Suzuki, M., Asaumi, R. & Kawai, T. Dicom segmentation and stl creation for 3D printing: a process and software package comparison for osseous anatomy. 3D Print. Med. 6, 1–12 (2020).
Mitsouras, D. et al. Medical 3D printing for the radiologist. Radiographics 35, 1965–1988 (2015).
Rocca, M., Fragasso, A., Liu, W., Heinrich, M. A. & Zhang, Y. S. Embedded multi-material extrusion bioprinting. SLAS Technol. 23, 154–163 (2017).
Lee, J. M. & Yeong, W. Y. Design and printing strategies in 3D bioprinting of cell-hydrogels: a review. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 5, 2856–2865 (2016).
Bader, C. et al. Making data matter: voxel printing for the digital fabrication of data across scales and domains. Sci. Adv. 4, eaas8652 (2018).
Skylar-Scott, M. A., Mueller, J., Visser, C. W. & Lewis, J. A. Voxelated soft matter via multimaterial multinozzle 3D printing. Nature 575, 330–335 (2019).
Wang, H. et al. Valve-based consecutive bioprinting method for multimaterial tissue-like constructs with controllable interfaces. Biofabrication 13, 035001 (2021).
Ma, K. et al. Application of robotic-assisted in situ 3D printing in cartilage regeneration with HAMA hydrogel: an in vivo study. J. Adv. Res. 23, 123–132 (2020).
Zhu, Z., Park, H. S. & Mcalpine, M. C. 3D printed deformable sensors. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba5575 (2020).
Zhu, Z. et al. 3D printed functional and biological materials on moving freeform surfaces. Adv. Mater. 30, 1707495 (2018).
Adib, A. A. et al. Direct-write 3D printing and characterization of a GelMA-based biomaterial for intracorporeal tissue engineering. Biofabrication 12, 045006 (2020).
Moncal, K. K. et al. Intra-operative bioprinting of hard, soft, and hard/soft composite tissues for craniomaxillofacial reconstruction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2010858 (2021).
Theus, A. S. et al. Bioprintability: physiomechanical and biological requirements of materials for 3D bioprinting processes. Polymers 12, 2262 (2020).
Chopin-Doroteo, M., Mandujano-Tinoco, E. A. & Krötzsch, E. Tailoring of the rheological properties of bioinks to improve bioprinting and bioassembly for tissue replacement. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 1865, 129782 (2020).
Kyle, S., Jessop, Z. M., Al-Sabah, A. & Whitaker, I. S. ‘Printability’ of candidate biomaterials for extrusion based 3D printing: state-of-the-art. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 6, 1700264 (2017).
Pakhomova, C., Popov, D., Maltsev, E., Akhatov, I. & Pasko, A. Software for bioprinting. Int. J. Bioprint. 6, 279 (2020).
Leppiniemi, J. et al. 3D-printable bioactivated nanocellulose–alginate hydrogels. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 21959–21970 (2017).
Göhl, J. et al. Simulations of 3D bioprinting: predicting bioprintability of nanofibrillar inks. Biofabrication 10, 034105 (2018).
Lemarié, L., Anandan, A., Petiot, E., Marquette, C. & Courtial, E.-J. Rheology, simulation and data analysis toward bioprinting cell viability awareness. Bioprinting 21, e00119 (2021).
Robu, A., Robu, N. & Neagu, A. in 2018 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI) 1–5 (IEEE, 2018).
Robu, A. & Stoicu-Tivadar, L. Simmmc — an informatic application for modeling and simulating the evolution of multicellular systems in the vicinity of biomaterials. Romanian J. Biophys. 26, 145–162 (2016).
Groll, J. et al. A definition of bioinks and their distinction from biomaterial inks. Biofabrication 11, 013001 (2018).
Gungor-Ozkerim, P. S., Inci, I., Zhang, Y. S., Khademhosseini, A. & Dokmeci, M. R. Bioinks for 3D bioprinting: an overview. Biomater. Sci. 6, 915–946 (2018).
Skardal, A. & Atala, A. Biomaterials for integration with 3-D bioprinting. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 43, 730–746 (2015).
Hospodiuk, M., Dey, M., Sosnoski, D. & Ozbolat, I. T. The bioink: a comprehensive review on bioprintable materials. Biotechnol. Adv. 35, 217–239 (2017).
Nulty, J., Schipani, R., Burdis, R. & Kelly, D. J. in Polymer-Based Additive Manufacturing (ed. Devine, D. M.) 187–218 (Springer, 2019).
Kim, B. S., Das, S., Jang, J. & Cho, D.-W. Decellularized extracellular matrix-based bioinks for engineering tissue-and organ-specific microenvironments. Chem. Rev. 120, 10608–10661 (2020).
Morgan, F. L. C., Moroni, L. & Baker, M. B. Dynamic bioinks to advance bioprinting. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 9, 1901798 (2020).
Ravanbakhsh, H., Bao, G., Luo, Z., Mongeau, L. G. & Zhang, Y. S. Composite inks for extrusion printing of biological and biomedical constructs. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 7, 4009–4026 (2021).
Loebel, C., Rodell, C. B., Chen, M. H. & Burdick, J. A. Shear-thinning and self-healing hydrogels as injectable therapeutics and for 3D-printing. Nat. Protoc. 12, 1521 (2017).
Müller, S. J. et al. Flow and hydrodynamic shear stress inside a printing needle during biofabrication. PLoS ONE 15, e0236371 (2020).
Chen, N. et al. Hydrogel bioink with multilayered interfaces improves dispersibility of encapsulated cells in extrusion bioprinting. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 30585–30595 (2019).
Ghavaminejad, A., Ashammakhi, N., Wu, X. Y. & Khademhosseini, A. Crosslinking strategies for 3D bioprinting of polymeric hydrogels. Small 16, 2002931 (2020).
Ying, G., Jiang, N., Yu, C. & Zhang, Y. S. Three-dimensional bioprinting of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA). Biodesign Manuf. 1, 215–224 (2018).
Skardal, A. et al. A hydrogel bioink toolkit for mimicking native tissue biochemical and mechanical properties in bioprinted tissue constructs. Acta Biomater. 25, 24–34 (2015).
Bertlein, S. et al. Thiol–ene clickable gelatin: a platform bioink for multiple 3D biofabrication technologies. Adv. Mater. 29, 1703404 (2017).
Tytgat, L. et al. Additive manufacturing of photo-crosslinked gelatin scaffolds for adipose tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 94, 340–350 (2019).
Fisch, P., Broguiere, N., Finkielsztein, S., Linder, T. & Zenobi-Wong, M. Bioprinting of cartilaginous auricular constructs utilizing an enzymatically crosslinkable bioink. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2008261 (2021).
Hong, S., Kim, J. S., Jung, B., Won, C. & Hwang, C. Coaxial bioprinting of cell-laden vascular constructs using a gelatin–tyramine bioink. Biomater. Sci. 7, 4578–4587 (2019).
Ouyang, L., Highley, C. B., Sun, W. & Burdick, J. A. A generalizable strategy for the 3D bioprinting of hydrogels from nonviscous photo-crosslinkable inks. Adv. Mater. 29, 1604983 (2017).
Berg, J. et al. Optimization of cell-laden bioinks for 3D bioprinting and efficient infection with influenza A virus. Sci. Rep. 8, 13877 (2018).
Gao, T. et al. Optimization of gelatin–alginate composite bioink printability using rheological parameters: a systematic approach. Biofabrication 10, 034106 (2018).
Yang, X. et al. Collagen-alginate as bioink for three-dimensional (3D) cell printing based cartilage tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 83, 195–201 (2018).
Li, C. et al. Rapid formation of a supramolecular polypeptide–DNA hydrogel for in situ three-dimensional multilayer bioprinting. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 3957–3961 (2015).
Susapto, H. H. et al. Ultrashort peptide bioinks support automated printing of large-scale constructs assuring long-term survival of printed tissue constructs. Nano Lett. 21, 2719–2729 (2021).
Markstedt, K. et al. 3D bioprinting human chondrocytes with nanocellulose–alginate bioink for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Biomacromolecules 16, 1489–1496 (2015).
Distler, T. et al. 3D printed oxidized alginate-gelatin bioink provides guidance for C2C12 muscle precursor cell orientation and differentiation via shear stress during bioprinting. Biofabrication 12, 045005 (2020).
Chimene, D. et al. Nanoengineered ionic–covalent entanglement (nice) bioinks for 3D bioprinting. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 9957–9968 (2018).
Ouyang, L. et al. Expanding and optimizing 3D bioprinting capabilities using complementary network bioinks. Sci. Adv. 6, eabc5529 (2020).
Zhu, K. et al. A general strategy for extrusion bioprinting of bio-macromolecular bioinks through alginate-templated dual-stage crosslinking. Macromol. Biosci. 18, 1800127 (2018).
Ying, G.-L. et al. Aqueous two-phase emulsion bioink-enabled 3D bioprinting of porous hydrogels. Adv. Mater. 30, 1805460 (2018).
Bao, G. et al. Triggered micropore-forming bioprinting of porous viscoelastic hydrogels. Mater. Horiz. 7, 2336–2347 (2020).
Ying, G. et al. Bioprinted injectable hierarchically porous gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel constructs with shape-memory properties. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 2003740 (2020).
Ying, G. et al. An open-source handheld extruder loaded with pore-forming bioink for in situ wound dressing. Mater. Today Bio 8, 100074 (2020).
Highley, C. B., Song, K. H., Daly, A. C. & Burdick, J. A. Jammed microgel inks for 3D printing applications. Adv. Sci. 6, 1801076 (2019).
Kessel, B. et al. 3D bioprinting of macroporous materials based on entangled hydrogel microstrands. Adv. Sci. 7, 2001419 (2020).
Jang, J. et al. Tailoring mechanical properties of decellularized extracellular matrix bioink by vitamin B2-induced photo-crosslinking. Acta Biomater. 33, 88–95 (2016).
Kim, H. et al. Light-activated decellularized extracellular matrix-based bioinks for volumetric tissue analogs at the centimeter scale. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2011252 (2021).
Wu, W., Deconinck, A. & Lewis, J. A. Omnidirectional printing of 3D microvascular networks. Adv. Mater. 23, H178–H183 (2011).
Kolesky, D. B. et al. 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs. Adv. Mater. 26, 3124–3130 (2014).
Homan, K. A. et al. Bioprinting of 3D convoluted renal proximal tubules on perfusable chips. Sci. Rep. 6, 34845 (2016).
Kolesky, D. B., Homan, K. A., Skylar-Scott, M. A. & Lewis, J. A. Three-dimensional bioprinting of thick vascularized tissues. Proct. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 3179–3184 (2016).
Lin, N. Y. C. et al. Renal reabsorption in 3D vascularized proximal tubule models. Proct. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 5399–5404 (2019).
Miller, J. S. et al. Rapid casting of patterned vascular networks for perfusable engineered three-dimensional tissues. Nat. Mater. 11, 768–774 (2012).
Bertassoni, L. E. et al. Hydrogel bioprinted microchannel networks for vascularization of tissue engineering constructs. Lab. Chip 14, 2202–2211 (2014).
Massa, S. et al. Bioprinted 3D vascularized tissue model for drug toxicity analysis. Biomicrofluidics 11, 044109 (2017).
Duchamp, M. et al. Sacrificial bioprinting of a mammary ductal carcinoma model. Biotechnol. J. 14, 1700703 (2019).
Liu, T. et al. Investigating lymphangiogenesis in a sacrificially bioprinted volumetric model of breast tumor tissue. Methods 190, 72–79 (2021).
Lee, V. K. et al. Creating perfused functional vascular channels using 3D bio-printing technology. Biomaterials 35, 8092–8102 (2014).
Ozturk, M. S. et al. High-resolution tomographic analysis of in vitro 3D glioblastoma tumor model under long-term drug treatment. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay7513 (2020).
Hinton, T. J. et al. Three-dimensional printing of complex biological structures by freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500758 (2015).
Bhattacharjee, T. et al. Writing in the granular gel medium. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500655 (2015).
Highley, C. B., Rodell, C. B. & Burdick, J. A. Direct 3D printing of shear-thinning hydrogels into self-healing hydrogels. Adv. Mater. 27, 5075–5079 (2015).
Jeon, O., Lee, Y. B., Hinton, T. J., Feinberg, A. W. & Alsberg, E. Cryopreserved cell-laden alginate microgel bioink for 3D bioprinting of living tissues. Mater. Today Chem. 12, 61–70 (2019).
Ning, L. et al. Embedded 3D bioprinting of gelatin methacryloyl-based constructs with highly tunable structural fidelity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 44563–44577 (2020).
Hull, S. M. et al. 3D bioprinting using universal orthogonal network (union) bioinks. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2007983 (2021).
Skylar-Scott, M. A. et al. Biomanufacturing of organ-specific tissues with high cellular density and embedded vascular channels. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw2459 (2019).
Compaan, A. M., Song, K., Chai, W. & Huang, Y. Cross-linkable microgel composite matrix bath for embedded bioprinting of perfusable tissue constructs and sculpting of solid objects. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 7855–7868 (2020).
Luo, G. et al. Freeform, reconfigurable embedded printing of all-aqueous 3D architectures. Adv. Mater. 31, 1904631 (2019).
Chao, Y. & Shum, H. C. Emerging aqueous two-phase systems: from fundamentals of interfaces to biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 114–142 (2020).
Ma, Q. et al. Cell-inspired all-aqueous microfluidics: from intracellular liquid–liquid phase separation toward advanced biomaterials. Adv. Sci. 7, 1903359 (2020).
Duarte Campos, D. F. et al. Three-dimensional printing of stem cell-laden hydrogels submerged in a hydrophobic high-density fluid. Biofabrication 5, 015003 (2012).
Shin, S. et al. Solid matrix-assisted printing for three-dimensional structuring of a viscoelastic medium surface. Nat. Commun. 10, 4650 (2019).
Mccormack, A., Highley, C. B., Leslie, N. R. & Melchels, F. P. W. 3D printing in suspension baths: keeping the promises of bioprinting afloat. Trends Biotechnol. 38, 584–593 (2020).
Shiwarski, D. J., Hudson, A. R., Tashman, J. W. & Feinberg, A. W. Emergence of fresh 3D printing as a platform for advanced tissue biofabrication. APL. Bioeng. 5, 010904 (2021).
Onoe, H. et al. Metre-long cell-laden microfibres exhibit tissue morphologies and functions. Nat. Mater. 12, 584–590 (2013).
Kang, E. et al. Digitally tunable physicochemical coding of material composition and topography in continuous microfibres. Nat. Mater. 10, 877–883 (2011).
Costantini, M., Colosi, C., S´wie˛szkowski, W. & Barbetta, A. Co-axial wet-spinning in 3D bioprinting: state of the art and future perspective of microfluidic integration. Biofabrication 11, 012001 (2018).
Zhang, Y., Yu, Y. & Ozbolat, I. T. Direct bioprinting of vessel-like tubular microfluidic channels. J. Nanotechnol. Eng. Med. 4, 020902 (2013).
Zhang, Y. et al. In vitro study of directly bioprinted perfusable vasculature conduits. Biomater. Sci. 3, 134–143 (2015).
Jia, W. et al. Direct 3D bioprinting of perfusable vascular constructs using a blend bioink. Biomaterials 106, 58–68 (2016).
Colosi, C. et al. Microfluidic bioprinting of heterogeneous 3D tissue constructs using low-viscosity bioink. Adv. Mater. 28, 677–684 (2015).
Costantini, M. et al. Microfluidic-enhanced 3D bioprinting of aligned myoblast-laden hydrogels leads to functionally organized myofibers in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials 131, 98–110 (2017).
Gao, G. et al. Tissue-engineering of vascular grafts containing endothelium and smooth-muscle using triple-coaxial cell printing. Appl. Phys. Rev. 6, 041402 (2019).
Colosi, C. et al. Rapid prototyping of chitosan-coated alginate scaffolds through the use of a 3D fiber deposition technique. J. Mater. Chem. B 2, 6779–6791 (2014).
Pi, Q. et al. Digitally tunable microfluidic bioprinting of multilayered cannular tissues. Adv. Mater. 30, 1706913 (2018).
Gao, G. et al. Construction of a novel in vitro atherosclerotic model from geometry-tunable artery equivalents engineered via in-bath coaxial cell printing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2008878 (2021).
Liu, W. et al. Coaxial extrusion bioprinting of 3D microfibrous constructs with cell-favorable gelatin methacryloyl microenvironments. Biofabrication 10, 024102 (2018).
Wu, D. et al. A 3D-bioprinted multiple myeloma model. Adv. Healthc. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202100884 (2021).
Wang, Y. et al. Coaxial extrusion of tubular tissue constructs using a gelatin/gelma blend bioink. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 5, 5514–5524 (2019).
Tavafoghi, M. et al. Multimaterial bioprinting and combination of processing techniques towards the fabrication of biomimetic tissues and organs. Biofabrication 13, 042002 (2021).
Freeman, F. E. et al. 3D bioprinting spatiotemporally defined patterns of growth factors to tightly control tissue regeneration. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb5093 (2020).
Liu, W. et al. Rapid continuous multimaterial extrusion bioprinting. Adv. Mater. 29, 1604630 (2017).
Hardin, J. O., Ober, T. J., Valentine, A. D. & Lewis, J. A. Microfluidic printheads for multimaterial 3D printing of viscoelastic inks. Adv. Mater. 27, 3279–3284 (2015).
Lee, C.-Y., Lin, C.-H. & Fu, L.-M. in Encyclopedia of Microfluidics and Nanofluidics (ed. Dongqing, L.) 1602–1610 (Springer, 2008).
Chang, C.-C., Fu, L.-M. & Yang, R.-J. in Encyclopedia of Microfluidics and Nanofluidics (ed. Dongqing, L.) 33–38 (Springer, 2008).
Ober, T. J., Foresti, D. & Lewis, J. A. Active mixing of complex fluids at the microscale. Proct. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 12293–12298 (2015).
Idaszek, J. et al. 3d bioprinting of hydrogel constructs with cell and material gradients for the regeneration of full-thickness chondral defect using a microfluidic printing head. Biofabrication 11, 044101 (2019).
Chávez-Madero, C. et al. Using chaotic advection for facile high-throughput fabrication of ordered multilayer micro- and nanostructures: continuous chaotic printing. Biofabrication 12, 035023 (2020).
Ceballos-González, C. F. et al. High-throughput and continuous chaotic bioprinting of spatially controlled bacterial microcosms. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 7, 2408–2419 (2021).
Bolívar-Monsalve, E. J. et al. Continuous chaotic bioprinting of skeletal muscle-like constructs. Bioprinting 21, e00125 (2021).
Samandari, M. et al. Controlling cellular organization in bioprinting through designed 3D microcompartmentalization. Appl. Phys. Rev. 8, 021404 (2021).
Datta, P., Vyas, V., Dhara, S., Chowdhury, A. R. & Barui, A. Anisotropy properties of tissues: a basis for fabrication of biomimetic anisotropic scaffolds for tissue engineering. J. Bionic Eng. 16, 842–868 (2019).
Malda, J. et al. 25th anniversary article: engineering hydrogels for biofabrication. Adv. Mater. 25, 5011–5028 (2013).
Fu, Z. et al. Printability in extrusion bioprinting. Biofabrication https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/abe7ab (2021).
Gillispie, G. et al. Assessment methodologies for extrusion-based bioink printability. Biofabrication 12, 022003 (2020).
Kesti, M. et al. A versatile bioink for three-dimensional printing of cellular scaffolds based on thermally and photo-triggered tandem gelation. Acta Biomater. 11, 162–172 (2015).
Ouyang, L., Yao, R., Zhao, Y. & Sun, W. Effect of bioink properties on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of embryonic stem cells. Biofabrication 8, 035020 (2016).
Lee, J. M., Ng, W. L. & Yeong, W. Y. Resolution and shape in bioprinting: strategizing towards complex tissue and organ printing. Appl. Phys. Rev. 6, 011307 (2019).
Ribeiro, A. et al. Assessing bioink shape fidelity to aid material development in 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication 10, 014102 (2017).
Lee, J. M. & Yeong, W. Y. Engineering macroscale cell alignment through coordinated toolpath design using support-assisted 3D bioprinting. J. R. Soc. Interface 17, 20200294 (2020).
Tan, E. Y. S. & Yeong, W. Y. Concentric bioprinting of alginate-based tubular constructs using multi-nozzle extrusion-based technique. Int. J. Bioprinting 1, 49–56 (2015).
Soltan, N., Ning, L., Mohabatpour, F., Papagerakis, P. & Chen, X. Printability and cell viability in bioprinting alginate dialdehyde-gelatin scaffolds. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 5, 2976–2987 (2019).
Wang, L., Xu, M., Zhang, L., Zhou, Q. & Luo, L. Automated quantitative assessment of three-dimensional bioprinted hydrogel scaffolds using optical coherence tomography. Biomed. Opt. Express 7, 894–910 (2016).
Petta, D., Grijpma, D. W., Alini, M., Eglin, D. & D’este, M. Three-dimensional printing of a tyramine hyaluronan derivative with double gelation mechanism for independent tuning of shear thinning and postprinting curing. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 4, 3088–3098 (2018).
Mahmodi, H., Piloni, A., Utama, R. & Kabakova, I. Mechanical mapping of bioprinted hydrogel models by brillouin microscopy. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.18.431535 (2021).
Boularaoui, S., Al Hussein, G., Khan, K. A., Christoforou, N. & Stefanini, C. An overview of extrusion-based bioprinting with a focus on induced shear stress and its effect on cell viability. Bioprinting 20, e00093 (2020).
Blaeser, A. et al. Controlling shear stress in 3D bioprinting is a key factor to balance printing resolution and stem cell integrity. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 5, 326–333 (2016).
Liu, W. et al. Extrusion bioprinting of shear-thinning gelatin methacryloyl bioinks. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 6, 1601451 (2017).
Guvendiren, M., Lu, H. D. & Burdick, J. A. Shear-thinning hydrogels for biomedical applications. Soft Matter 8, 260–272 (2012).
Du Chatinier, D., Figler, K. P., Agrawal, P. & Zhang, Y. S. The potential of microfluidics-enhanced extrusion bioprinting. Biomicrofluidics 15, 041304 (2021).
Hölzl, K. et al. Bioink properties before, during and after 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication 8, 032002 (2016).
Zhang, Y. S. et al. Bioprinting 3D microfibrous scaffolds for engineering endothelialized myocardium and heart-on-a-chip. Biomaterials 110, 45–59 (2016).
Kupfer, M. E. et al. In situ expansion, differentiation, and electromechanical coupling of human cardiac muscle in a 3D bioprinted, chambered organoid. Circul. Res. 127, 207–224 (2020).
Song, Y. et al. Engineering of brain-like tissue constructs via 3D cell-printing technology. Biofabrication 12, 035016 (2020).
Bhise, N. S. et al. A liver-on-a-chip platform with bioprinted hepatic spheroids. Biofabrication 8, 014101 (2016).
Kang, D. et al. Bioprinting of multiscaled hepatic lobules within a highly vascularized construct. Small 16, 1905505 (2020).
Yang, H. et al. Three-dimensional bioprinted hepatorganoids prolong survival of mice with liver failure. Gut 70, 567–574 (2021).
Derr, K. et al. Fully three-dimensional bioprinted skin equivalent constructs with validated morphology and barrier function. Tissue Eng. C 25, 334–343 (2019).
Madden, L. R. et al. Bioprinted 3D primary human intestinal tissues model aspects of native physiology and adme/tox functions. iScience 2, 156–167 (2018).
Cao, X. et al. A tumor-on-a-chip system with bioprinted blood and lymphatic vessel pair. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1807173 (2019).
Kang, H.-W. et al. A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 312–319 (2016).
Kesti, M. et al. Bioprinting complex cartilaginous structures with clinically compliant biomaterials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 7406–7417 (2015).
Duan, B., Hockaday, L. A., Kang, K. H. & Butcher, J. T. 3D bioprinting of heterogeneous aortic valve conduits with alginate/gelatin hydrogels. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 101, 1255–1264 (2013).
De Ruijter, M., Ribeiro, A., Dokter, I., Castilho, M. & Malda, J. Simultaneous micropatterning of fibrous meshes and bioinks for the fabrication of living tissue constructs. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 8, 1800418 (2019).
Kundu, J., Shim, J. H., Jang, J., Kim, S. W. & Cho, D. W. An additive manufacturing-based PCL–alginate–chondrocyte bioprinted scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 9, 1286–1297 (2015).
Schuurman, W. et al. Bioprinting of hybrid tissue constructs with tailorable mechanical properties. Biofabrication 3, 021001 (2011).
Shim, J.-H., Lee, J.-S., Kim, J. Y. & Cho, D.-W. Bioprinting of a mechanically enhanced three-dimensional dual cell-laden construct for osteochondral tissue engineering using a multi-head tissue/organ building system. J. Micromech. Microeng. 22, 085014 (2012).
Rhee, S., Puetzer, J. L., Mason, B. N., Reinhart-King, C. A. & Bonassar, L. J. 3D bioprinting of spatially heterogeneous collagen constructs for cartilage tissue engineering. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2, 1800–1805 (2016).
Kilian, D. et al. 3D bioprinting of osteochondral tissue substitutes — in vitro-chondrogenesis in multi-layered mineralized constructs. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–17 (2020).
Critchley, S. et al. 3D printing of fibre-reinforced cartilaginous templates for the regeneration of osteochondral defects. Acta Biomater. 113, 130–143 (2020).
Peiffer, Q. C. et al. Melt electrowriting onto anatomically relevant biodegradable substrates: resurfacing a diarthrodial joint. Mater. Des. 195, 109025 (2020).
Diloksumpan, P. et al. Combining multi-scale 3D printing technologies to engineer reinforced hydrogel-ceramic interfaces. Biofabrication 12, 025014 (2020).
Daly, A. C., Pitacco, P., Nulty, J., Cunniffe, G. M. & Kelly, D. J. 3D printed microchannel networks to direct vascularisation during endochondral bone repair. Biomaterials 162, 34–46 (2018).
Shao, L. et al. Synchronous 3D bioprinting of large-scale cell-laden constructs with nutrient networks. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 9, 1901142 (2019).
Gao, Q., He, Y., Fu, J.-Z., Liu, A. & Ma, L. Coaxial nozzle-assisted 3D bioprinting with built-in microchannels for nutrients delivery. Biomaterials 61, 203–215 (2015).
Mirabella, T. et al. 3D-printed vascular networks direct therapeutic angiogenesis in ischaemia. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 1, 0083 (2017).
Nulty, J. et al. 3D bioprinting of prevascularised implants for the repair of critically-sized bone defects. Acta Biomater. 126, 154–169 (2021).
Willemen, N. G. A. et al. Oxygen-releasing biomaterials: current challenges and future applications. Trends Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.01.007 (2021).
Correia, C. R. & Mano, J. F. 3D-bioprinted constructs that breathe. Matter 4, 15–17 (2021).
Erdem, A. et al. 3D bioprinting of oxygenated cell-laden gelatin methacryloyl constructs. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 9, 1901794 (2020).
Farzin, A. et al. Self-oxygenation of tissues orchestrates full-thickness vascularization of living implants. Adv. Funct. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202100850 (2021).
Lode, A. et al. Green bioprinting: fabrication of photosynthetic algae-laden hydrogel scaffolds for biotechnological and medical applications. Report No. 1618-0240 (Wiley Online Library, 2015).
Maharjan, S. et al. Symbiotic photosynthetic oxygenation within 3D-bioprinted vascularized tissues. Matter 4, 217–240 (2021).
Di Bella, C. et al. In situ handheld three-dimensional bioprinting for cartilage regeneration. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 12, 611–621 (2018).
D O’connell, C. et al. Development of the biopen: a handheld device for surgical printing of adipose stem cells at a chondral wound site. Biofabrication 8, 015019 (2016).
Duchi, S. et al. Handheld co-axial bioprinting: application to in situ surgical cartilage repair. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–12 (2017).
Onofrillo, C. et al. Biofabrication of human articular cartilage: a path towards the development of a clinical treatment. Biofabrication 10, 045006 (2018).
Hakimi, N. et al. Handheld skin printer: in situ formation of planar biomaterials and tissues. Lab. Chip 18, 1440–1451 (2018).
Cheng, R. Y. et al. Handheld instrument for wound-conformal delivery of skin precursor sheets improves healing in full-thickness burns. Biofabrication 12, 025002 (2020).
Russell, C. S. et al. In situ printing of adhesive hydrogel scaffolds for the treatment of skeletal muscle injuries. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 3, 1568–1579 (2020).
Alarcin, E. et al. Injectable shear-thinning hydrogels for delivering osteogenic and angiogenic cells and growth factors. Biomater. Sci. 6, 1604–1615 (2018).
Zhang, Y. S. & Khademhosseini, A. Systems and methods for in vivo multi-material bioprinting. Patent No. WO2017184839A1 (2017).
Zhao, W. & Xu, T. Preliminary engineering for in situ in vivo bioprinting: a novel micro bioprinting platform for in situ in vivo bioprinting at a gastric wound site. Biofabrication 12, 045020 (2020).
Zhou, C. et al. Ferromagnetic soft catheter robots for minimally invasive bioprinting. Nat. Commun. 12, 5072 (2021).
Fischbach, C. et al. Engineering tumors with 3D scaffolds. Nat. Methods 4, 855–860 (2007).
Zhang, Y. et al. Chronic label-free volumetric photoacoustic microscopy of melanoma cells in three-dimensional porous scaffolds. Biomaterials 31, 8651–8658 (2010).
Prendergast, M. E. et al. Microphysiological systems: automated fabrication via extrusion bioprinting. Microphysiol. Syst. 2, 3 (2018).
Maharjan, S., Bonilla, D. & Zhang, Y. S. Three-dimensional bioprinting for tissue and disease modeling. Mater. Matters https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/GB/en/technical-documents/technical-article/materials-science-and-engineering/3d-bioprinting/3d-bioprinting-tissue0 (2019).
Miri, A. K. et al. Effective bioprinting resolution in tissue model fabrication. Lab. Chip 19, 2019–2037 (2019).
Li, J., Parra-Cantu, C., Wang, Z. & Zhang, Y. S. Improving bioprinted volumetric tumor microenvironments in vitro. Trends Cancer 6, 745–756 (2020).
Parra-Cantu, C., Li, W., Quiñones-Hinojosa, A. & Zhang, Y. S. 3D bioprinting of glioblastoma models. J. 3D Print. Med. 4, 113–125 (2020).
Nichol, J. W. et al. Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Biomaterials 31, 5536–5544 (2010).
Ramon-Azcon, J. et al. Gelatin methacrylate as a promising hydrogel for 3D microscale organization and proliferation of dielectrophoretically patterned cells. Lab. Chip 12, 2959–2969 (2012).
Yoon, H. J. et al. Cold water fish gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel for tissue engineering application. PLoS ONE 11, e0163902 (2016).
Yue, K. et al. Structural analysis of photocrosslinkable methacryloyl-modified protein derivatives. Biomaterials 139, 163–171 (2017).
Shin, S. R. et al. A bioactive carbon nanotube-based ink for printing 2D and 3D flexible electronics. Adv. Mater. 28, 3280–3289 (2016).
Yin, J., Yan, M., Wang, Y., Fu, J. & Suo, H. 3D bioprinting of low-concentration cell-laden gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) bioinks with a two-step cross-linking strategy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 6849–6857 (2018).
Luo, C. et al. Low-temperature three-dimensional printing of tissue cartilage engineered with gelatin methacrylamide. Tissue Eng. C. 26, 306–316 (2020).
Su, R. et al. 3D printed self-supporting elastomeric structures for multifunctional microfluidics. Sci. Adv. 6, eabc9846 (2020).
Gough, A., Vernetti, L., Bergenthal, L., Shun, T. Y. & Taylor, D. L. The microphysiology systems database for analyzing and modeling compound interactions with human and animal organ models. Appl. Vitro Toxicol. 2, 103–117 (2016).
Mironov, V. et al. Organ printing: tissue spheroids as building blocks. Biomaterials 30, 2164–2174 (2009).
Norotte, C., Marga, F. S., Niklason, L. E. & Forgacs, G. Scaffold-free vascular tissue engineering using bioprinting. Biomaterials 30, 5910–5917 (2009).
Yu, Y. et al. Three-dimensional bioprinting using self-assembling scalable scaffold-free “tissue strands” as a new bioink. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–11 (2016).
Jeon, O. et al. Individual cell-only bioink and photocurable supporting medium for 3D printing and generation of engineered tissues with complex geometries. Mater. Horiz. 6, 1625–1631 (2019).
Brassard, J. A. & Lutolf, M. P. Engineering stem cell self-organization to build better organoids. Cell Stem Cell 24, 860–876 (2019).
Moldovan, N. I., Hibino, N. & Nakayama, K. Principles of the Kenzan method for robotic cell spheroid-based three-dimensional bioprinting. Tissue Eng. B 23, 237–244 (2017).
Ayan, B. et al. Aspiration-assisted bioprinting for precise positioning of biologics. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaw5111 (2020).
Daly, A. C., Davidson, M. D. & Burdick, J. A. 3D bioprinting of high cell-density heterogeneous tissue models through spheroid fusion within self-healing hydrogels. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–13 (2021).
Lawlor, K. T. et al. Cellular extrusion bioprinting improves kidney organoid reproducibility and conformation. Nat. Mater. 20, 260–271 (2021).
Brassard, J. A., Nikolaev, M., Hübscher, T., Hofer, M. & Lutolf, M. P. Recapitulating macro-scale tissue self-organization through organoid bioprinting. Nat. Mater. 20, 22–29 (2021).
Viola, J. M. et al. Guiding cell network assembly using shape-morphing hydrogels. Adv. Mater. 32, 2002195 (2020).
Behl, M. & Lendlein, A. Shape-memory polymers. Mater. Today 10, 20–28 (2007).
Xia, Y., He, Y., Zhang, F., Liu, Y. & Leng, J. A review of shape memory polymers and composites: mechanisms, materials, and applications. Adv. Mater. 33, 2000713 (2021).
Wang, M., Li, W., Garciamendez-Mijares, C. E. & Zhang, Y. S. Engineering (bio)materials through shrinkage and expansion. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 21, 2100380 (2021).
Gao, B. et al. 4D bioprinting for biomedical applications. Trends Biotechnol. 34, 746–756 (2016).
An, J., Chua, C. K. & Mironov, V. A perspective on 4D bioprinting. Int. J. Bioprint. 2, 3–5 (2016).
Li, Y.-C., Zhang, Y. S., Akpek, A., Shin, S. R. & Khademhosseini, A. 4D bioprinting: the next-generation technology for biofabrication. Biofabrication 9, 012001 (2017).
Ge, Q., Qi, H. J. & Dunn, M. L. Active materials by four-dimension printing. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 131901 (2013).
Tibbits, S. 4D printing: multi-material shape change. Archit. Des. 84, 116–121 (2014).
Sydney Gladman, A., Matsumoto, E. A., Nuzzo, R. G., Mahadevan, L. & Lewis, J. A. Biomimetic 4D printing. Nat. Mater. 15, 413–418 (2016).
Gong, J. et al. Complexation-induced resolution enhancement of 3D-printed hydrogel constructs. Nat. Commun. 11, 1267 (2020).
Kuribayashi-Shigetomi, K., Onoe, H. & Takeuchi, S. Cell origami: self-folding of three-dimensional cell-laden microstructures driven by cell traction force. PLoS ONE 7, e51085 (2012).
Davidson, M. D. et al. Programmable and contractile materials through cell encapsulation in fibrous hydrogel assemblies. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.19.440470 (2021).
Nguyen, P. Q., Courchesne, N.-M. D., Duraj-Thatte, A., Praveschotinunt, P. & Joshi, N. S. Engineered living materials: prospects and challenges for using biological systems to direct the assembly of smart materials. Adv. Mater. 30, 1704847 (2018).
Huang, J. et al. Programmable and printable bacillus subtilis biofilms as engineered living materials. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 34–41 (2019).
Duraj-Thatte, A. M. et al. Programmable microbial ink for 3D printing of living materials produced from genetically engineered protein nanofibers. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.19.440538 (2021).
Emmermacher, J. et al. Engineering considerations on extrusion-based bioprinting: interactions of material behavior, mechanical forces and cells in the printing needle. Biofabrication 12, 025022 (2020).
Zhang, P. & Abate, A. R. High-definition single-cell printing: cell-by-cell fabrication of biological structures. Adv. Mater. 32, 2005346 (2020).
Tang, G. et al. Faithful fabrication of biocompatible multicompartmental memomicrospheres for digitally color-tunable barcoding. Small 16, 1907586 (2020).
Tang, G. et al. Designable dual-power micromotors fabricated from a biocompatible gas-shearing strategy. Chem. Eng. J. 407, 127187 (2021).
Hansen, C. J. et al. High-throughput printing via microvascular multinozzle arrays. Adv. Mater. 25, 96–102 (2013).
Lee, J., Oh, S. J., An, S. H., Kim, W.-D. & Kim, S.-H. Machine learning-based design strategy for 3D printable bioink: elastic modulus and yield stress determine printability. Biofabrication 12, 035018 (2020).
Mao, Y., He, Q. & Zhao, X. Designing complex architectured materials with generative adversarial networks. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz4169 (2020).
Yu, C. & Jiang, J. A perspective on using machine learning in 3D bioprinting. Int. J. Bioprint. 6, 253 (2020).
Conev, A. et al. Machine learning-guided three-dimensional printing of tissue engineering scaffolds. Tissue Engineering Part A 26, 1359–1368 (2020).
Zhu, Z., Ng, D. W. H., Park, H. S. & Mcalpine, M. C. 3D-printed multifunctional materials enabled by artificial-intelligence-assisted fabrication technologies. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 27–47 (2020).
Jin, Z., Zhang, Z. & Gu, G. X. Autonomous in-situ correction of fused deposition modeling printers using computer vision and deep learning. Manuf. Lett. 22, 11–15 (2019).
Sitthi-Amorn, P. et al. Multifab: a machine vision assisted platform for multi-material 3d printing. Acm Trans. Graph. 34, 1–11 (2015).
Jin, Z., Zhang, Z. & Gu, G. X. Automated real-time detection and prediction of interlayer imperfections in additive manufacturing processes using artificial intelligence. Adv. Intell. Syst. 2, 1900130 (2020).
Jin, Z., Zhang, Z., Shao, X. & Gu, G. X. Monitoring anomalies in 3D bioprinting with deep neural networks. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01761 (2021).
Eastridge, B. J., Holcomb, J. B. & Shackelford, S. Outcomes of traumatic hemorrhagic shock and the epidemiology of preventable death from injury. Transfusion 59, 1423–1428 (2019).
Schneeberger, K. et al. Converging biofabrication and organoid technologies: the next frontier in hepatic and intestinal tissue engineering? Biofabrication 9, 013001 (2017).
Parrish, J., Lim, K., Zhang, B., Radisic, M. & Woodfield, T. B. F. New frontiers for biofabrication and bioreactor design in microphysiological system development. Trends Biotechnol. 37, 1327–1343 (2019).
Castilho, M. et al. Multitechnology biofabrication: a new approach for the manufacturing of functional tissue structures? Trends Biotechnol. 38, 1316–1328 (2020).
Di Marzio, N., Eglin, D., Serra, T. & Moroni, L. Bio-fabrication: convergence of 3D bioprinting and nano-biomaterials in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 326 (2020).
Zhang, Y. S. & Khademhosseini, A. Advances in engineering hydrogels. Science 356, eaaf3627 (2017).
Y.S.Z. gratefully acknowledges funding from the NIH (R00CA201603, R21EB025270, R21EB026175, R21EB030257, R01EB028143 and R01HL153857), the National Science Foundation (CBET-EBMS-1936105) and the Brigham Research Institute. J.M. acknowledges support of the Gravitation Program ‘Materials Driven Regeneration’, funded by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (024.003.013; J.M.).
Y.S.Z. sits on the Scientific Advisory Board of Allevi, Inc., which did not participate in this work or bias it in any form. This interest has been reviewed and managed by the Brigham and Women’s Hospital in accordance with its Conflict of Interest policies. M.C.M. serves on the Scientific Advisory Board and holds equity in GRIP Molecular Technologies. M.C.M. is Co-Founder and CSO of Flui3D, Inc. These interests have been reviewed and managed by the University of Minnesota in accordance with its Conflict of Interest policies. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Methods Primers thanks Nureddin Ashammakhi, Bige Deniz Unluturk, Wenguo Cui and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
3D Slicer: https://www.slicer.org/
CECT 3D printing database: https://cect.umd.edu/3d-printing-database
IPS IBOFlow: https://industrialpathsolutions.se/ips-iboflow
Materialise Mimics: https://www.materialise.com/en/medical/mimics-innovation-suite/mimics
Mendeley Data: https://data.mendeley.com/
Rhinoceros 3D: https://www.rhino3d.com/
- Shape fidelity
The degree to which the bioprinted structure conforms to the digital model.
The trajectory that the nozzle of the 3D bioprinter follows during bioink extrusion.
- Infill density
The amount of material to be extruded for constructing the internal volume of a contruct, with 0% yielding a hollow shell structure (empty internally) and 100% yielding a full, solid object.
- Shear rate
The rate of change in velocity at which one layer of fluid passes over an adjacent layer.
Molecules, either synthetic or natural, that contain both hydrophilic and hydrophobic domains.
- Fugitive ink
An ink that serves as a temporary template after being printed, which can be subsequently selectively removed on demand to create a hollow space.
- Computer vision
Machine learning or other artificial intelligence algorithms for processing and interpreting the visual data received from cameras or other vision systems, analogous to the human vision system and the brain.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Y.S., Haghiashtiani, G., Hübscher, T. et al. 3D extrusion bioprinting. Nat Rev Methods Primers 1, 75 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-021-00073-8
This article is cited by
Nature Communications (2023)
Bio-Design and Manufacturing (2023)
Nature Reviews Methods Primers (2022)
Scientific Reports (2022)
Nature Reviews Nephrology (2022)