Abstract
The 2022 Hunga eruptions injected an observationally unprecedented amount of moisture directly into the stratosphere. However, stratospheric moisture can also be indirectly increased following a volcanic eruption, when heating from volcanic sulfate aerosol raises the tropical cold-point temperatures. In this work, we demonstrate that a 1 K increase in tropical cold-point temperatures can lead to indirect moisture increases in the stratosphere of comparable or even larger magnitude than observed for the direct injections during the Hunga eruptions. We base our reasoning on first-principle thermodynamic arguments combined with climate model and reanalysis output as well as observational data. We argue that following the next large-magnitude explosive eruption in the tropics, the strength of indirect increases in stratospheric moisture should be quantified using current measurement techniques.
Similar content being viewed by others
Direct and indirect moisture pathways into the stratosphere after volcanic eruptions
Stratospheric water vapour is an important greenhouse gas and plays a key role in stratospheric chemistry1,2,3,4. Explosive volcanic eruptions can enhance the stratospheric moisture content both directly and indirectly. In the direct pathway, moisture is directly injected into the stratosphere from within the volcanic plume leading to anomalies in water vapour concentrations that are initially very large and highly localized. For the vast majority of direct injections, the corresponding moisture increases observed in the satellite era were negligible and short-lived5,6. However, it was proposed that direct moisture injections caused by explosive eruptions that entrain sea-water could lead to substantial and immediate increases in stratospheric moisture mass7. In 2022 the eruptions of Hunga—a submarine volcano—led to a substantial and clearly observable water vapour increase in the stratosphere via the direct pathway for the first time. Estimates for the directly injected water vapour include 139 ± 88, 146 ± 59, 5010 and 70–150 Tg11, which is approximately equal to 5–10% of the stratospheric background water vapour burden. In contrast, the observed emitted sulfur dioxide (SO2) mass amounts to only 0.6–1.0 Tg SO212,13. Even when considering potential low-biases in the observational-based SO2 estimates caused by the speedup of aerosol formation due to the increased availability of moisture within the plume14,15, the injected water vapour amount is still at least one order of magnitude larger than the SO2 amount. The interaction between sea-water and magma (phreato-magmatic eruption) also enhanced the explosivity of the Hunga eruptions, with the volcanic plume reaching a maximum altitude of 57 km16. In the first three weeks after the eruption, changes in infra-red forcing attributable to the enhanced water vapour at altitudes above 25 km led to the descent of the plume to lower altitudes in the stratosphere17,18.
In contrast to the direct pathway, the indirect pathway results from the diabatic heating caused by the volcanic sulfate aerosol layer and relies on the control of moisture fluxes entering the stratosphere by the lowest temperatures between troposphere and stratosphere in the tropical tropopause layer (TTL)—the tropical cold-point temperatures19,20. In detail, volcanic sulfate aerosol not only scatters incoming solar shortwave radiation back to space, leading to surface cooling, but also absorbs near-infra-red and terrestrial longwave radiation. If sulfate aerosol is present in the TTL and lowermost tropical stratosphere, the associated tropical temperature increase will then allow for higher saturation specific humidity values and enhanced moisture fluxes into the stratosphere21,22. The increase in water vapour attributable to the indirect pathway depends on the magnitude and duration of volcanic sulfate aerosol heating in the TTL and, therefore, does not occur immediately after the climactic phase of an eruption but over a longer timescale in the aftermath of an eruption. For a tropical eruption of similar magnitude to the 1991 Mt. Pinatubo eruption (hereafter termed “Pinatubo-magnitude eruptions") TTL temperature increases reach peak values around three to six months after the eruption. Elevated TTL temperatures can then persist for around two years23,24.
Apart from diabatic heating, the presence of volcanic sulfate aerosols may also influence cloud formation processes, thus impacting the upper tropospheric moisture budget by introducing additional cloud condensation nuclei. The overall impact on upper tropospheric clouds remains a subject of ongoing research, given the only recently emerging model capability to simulate corresponding aerosol-cloud-microphysical processes in global convection-resolving models with the required temporal and vertical resolution. However, based on observational data, 80% of the stratospheric moisture budget can be explained by slowly ascending water vapour, with the remaining portion being transported into the stratosphere by deep convection with no noteworthy contribution from transport in cirrus clouds25. Observation-based studies also suggest that explicitly accounting for changes in cloud condensation nuclei may not be necessary to sufficiently explain the stratospheric moisture budget even under volcanically perturbed conditions26,27.
A quantitative comparison between the direct and indirect moisture transport pathway after volcanic eruptions is complicated, as the 1991 Mt. Pinatubo eruption—the most-relevant volcanic eruption for the indirect pathway in the satellite era to date—occurred during a time with observational data coverage inferior to today’s standards and limited due to the presence of the sulfate aerosol layer, which led to retrieval problems making the corresponding stratospheric water vapour products unreliable28,29,30,31. Deducing the water vapour entry values from measurements at higher altitudes one year after the eruption will yield results that are biased low because water vapour is a reactant in the oxidation process of the emitted volcanic sulfur dioxide to sulfuric acid vapour. Additionally, an extremely unusual stratospheric eddy heat flux opposed the aerosol heating during this specific event, which further obscured the signal32. Nevertheless, the Stratosphere-troposphere Processes And their Role in Climate (SPARC) report in 200033 describes a positive trend in stratospheric water vapour for the years 1992–1996, amounting, in total, to an additional 0.5–0.7 ppmv at 20 and 40 km altitude, respectively, based on Halogen Occultation Experiment (HALOE) data. The SPARC authors also confirm that the corresponding signal is characteristic of an episodic event such as the 1991 eruption of Mt. Pinatubo. Some frost point hygrometer measurements even report temporal and local moisture increases in the TTL and lower stratosphere of 1–2 ppmv following the 1991 Mt. Pinatubo eruption34. These measurements are in agreement with results from modelling studies of volcanic eruptions of different magnitudes35. Importantly, microwave sounding units (MSU) temperature measurements in the TTL at the time of the 1991 Mt. Pinatubo eruption also show increases in the lower stratosphere and TTL temperatures of 0.5–1.5 K36,37, although the heating is not as pronounced at the tropopause level as for the 1982 El Chichón eruption, potentially due to the aforementioned extremely unusual meteorological background conditions in 1991. Radiosonde measurements with a higher vertical resolution, however, documented cold-point temperature increases of 0.5–1.5 K, which were found to be in good agreement with changes in the water vapour entry values of up to 0.5 ppmv30,38,39,40. Based on these temperature changes, inferences of the stratospheric moisture increase can be made by using reanalysis data, which integrate the corresponding temperature measurements, in trajectory model calculations26,27 and comparing against data from modelling studies, which prescribed the measured sulfur emission or aerosol distribution22,24,41,42,43.
Here, we present a conceptual framework that allows for a quantitative comparison of direct moisture injections and the more common indirect moisture increases after large-magnitude explosive volcanic eruptions in the tropics. For the corresponding estimate only three constants and the warming of the lowest cold-point temperatures in the TTL, the so-called equivalent frost-point temperature (EFT) have to be known. The EFT is defined here as the temperature that would set the average water vapour amount entering the tropical stratosphere from below when assuming a homogeneous cold-point temperature and water vapour fluxes which are constrained by the Clausius–Clapeyron equation.
Estimation of indirect stratospheric moisture increases via the dependence of saturation-specific humidity on temperature
Water vapour changes via the indirect pathway are temperature-dependent, thus moisture flux changes can be calculated based on two relationships:
-
1.
After explosive volcanic eruptions, the water vapour increase at the cold-point tropopause follows the Clausius–Clapeyron scaling with a 12% rise per degree increase of the EFT35,44.
-
2.
The moisture partitioning in frozen and non-frozen contribution at the tropical cold-point tropopause remains constant at around 20%:80% even under temperature perturbations, which means that the frozen moisture also follows the Clausius–Clapeyron scaling at the cold-point tropopause45,46. The frozen moisture contribution can, therefore, be calculated by a temperature offset to the EFT (see Fig. 1).
Figure 2 shows an exemplary calculation of the moisture flux increase after a hypothetical tropical eruption leading to a 1 K increase in the EFT. The chosen temperature increase lies within the range of warming in the TTL and lower stratosphere after the 1991 Mt. Pinatubo eruption, which ranges between 0.5–1.5 K37 and 2.0 ± 0.8 K38 based on observational data. For our calculation, we assume a water vapour flux of 900 Tg per year into the volcanically unperturbed stratosphere6. With the 20% contribution of frozen moisture flux this yields a total moisture flux of 1125 Tg. If the EFT is enhanced by 1 K due to the presence of a stratospheric volcanic sulfate aerosol layer, the vapour flux per year will be increased to 1008 Tg following Clausius–Clapeyron scaling. With the additional frozen moisture, a total of 1260 Tg is obtained. This constitutes an increase of 135 Tg per year, which is close to the upper limit of the estimated range for the direct injection of 50–150 Tg during the 2022 Honga eruptions.
Moisture increases via the indirect pathway compared to water vapour directly injected by 2022 Hunga
For most eruptions, the emitted sulfur amount is better documented than the increase in EFT, thus we link both quantities in Table 1. We use EFT increases for four idealized tropical explosive volcanic eruptions emitting between 5 and 40 Tg S based on the model simulations35. The corresponding moisture increases are calculated using the presented framework. The respective EFT warming is based on the average EFT warming for the year after reaching the highest EFT, which occurs in the first year after an eruption. For 1991 Pinatubo, maximum temperature increases were observed around 90 days after the eruption itself23. The moisture increase after one year ranges between 86 Tg (for 5 Tg S) and 1298 Tg (for 40 Tg S). The 1991 Mt. Pinatubo eruption emitted around 7 Tg S into the tropical stratosphere47, which lies between our 5 and 10 Tg S scenarios. The moisture increase for the latter two scenarios via the indirect pathway is 86 and 299 Tg, respectively. This is slightly higher than the lowest estimate and double the highest estimate for 2022 Hunga.
Our result highlights the importance of considering the disparate durations over which the direct and indirect pathways operate. The direct pathway manifests peak water vapour anomalies almost instantly, whereas stratospheric water vapour concentrations increase continuously over the course of several months via the indirect pathway. It is, therefore, crucial to consider the long-term moisture transport into the stratosphere via the indirect pathway. Following the 2022 Hunga eruptions, Microwave Limb Sounder data revealed a height-dependent peak water vapour anomaly of 8 ppmv between [−30,0]°N within the first three months, contrasting with an initial highly localized water vapour anomaly of 1500 ppmv17,48. In contrast, analysis of the 1991 Mt. Pinatubo eruption indicated a stratospheric water vapour increase of up to 0.8 ppmv, based on trajectory calculations using MERRA-2 and JRA-55 reanalysis data between [−20,20]°N at θ = 400 K. The corresponding one-year-average increase in water vapour concentrations via transport into the stratosphere amounted to 0.6 ppmv over a one-year-average background transport value of 4.2 ppmv27. Considering these boundary conditions, the net influx of 1125 Tg into the stratosphere and unchanged relative importance of moisture transport pathways, which were demonstrated even under cold-point temperature perturbation of more than 9 K49, the stratospheric water vapour increase after 1991 Mt. Pinatubo, amounts up to 160 Tg over the course of 12 months compared to 50–150 Tg for the 2022 Hunga eruptions. The value of 160 Tg is calculated based on Eq. (1):
This estimate assumes a constant upwelling term. Some modelling studies have shown aerosol heating induced increases in upwelling after volcanic eruptions, especially near the atmospheric levels with highest aerosol concentrations50,51, however observational studies have found little effect in the TTL region52.
Conclusion
We conclude, that the magnitude of the moisture increase after the 2022 Hunga eruptions is not what makes Hunga so exceptional. Similar-magnitude moisture increases can be obtained via the indirect pathway, for Pinatubo-magnitude explosive eruptions in the tropics albeit on a different timescale than observed for 2022 Hunga.
What makes 2022 Hunga unprecedented, however, is the injection altitude, the observational coverage of a direct injection of this magnitude, and the radiatively-driven plume descent shortly after the eruption due to the highly localized moist volcanic cloud. Of additional interest is the comparatively low observed amount of sulfur emitted along with the moisture—a similar ratio would never be obtainable for the indirect pathway as the moisture increase is always a function of the heating in the TTL induced by the sulfate aerosol formed from the emitted sulfur. The directly injected moisture is, however, independent of the sulfur mass and aerosol altitude. This decoupling led to the possibility of a net positive total forcing after the Hunga eruptions, with the positive forcing of the emitted water vapour counterbalancing the negative forcing by the volcanic sulfate aerosol, although the sign of the long-term net radiative forcing is still being discussed. In model simulations, the estimated net forcing after 2022 Hunga ranges between a negative forcing of −0.2 W m2 48 and a positive forcing of up to 0.2 W m217. Some model studies conclude that the potential net positive forcing increased the likelihood of temporarily exceeding a global surface temperature anomaly of 1.5 K by 7%53. In contrast, the forcing due to indirect increases in stratospheric water vapour from a Pinatubo-magnitude eruption emitting 10 Tg S compensates around 4% of the negative sulfate aerosol forcing35, whereby the combined tropospheric and stratospheric water vapour feedback amplifies the cooling54 with a net negative forcing overall.
The next large-magnitude explosive eruption in the tropics might provide an opportunity to assess the strength of the indirect pathway using more comprehensive measurements than in the past. This would yield an estimate for the volcanically induced stratospheric water vapour increase that can be compared to that simulated in current-generation climate models.
References
Forster, P. M. D. F. & Shine, K. P. Assessing the climate impact of trends in stratospheric water vapor. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 10–1–10–4 (2002).
Solomon, S. et al. Contributions of stratospheric water vapor to decadal changes in the rate of global warming. Science (New York, NY) 327, 1219–1223 (2010).
Ko, M. K. W., Newman, P. A., Reimann, S. & Strahan, S. E. SPARC Report on Lifetimes of Stratospheric Ozone-Depleting Substances, their Replacements, and Related Species. Technical Report (SPARC Office, 2013).
Nowack, P. et al. Response of stratospheric water vapour to warming constrained by satellite observations. Nat. Geosci. 16, 577–583 (2023).
Schwartz, M. J. et al. Convectively injected water vapor in the North American summer lowermost stratosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 2316–2321 (2013).
Sioris, C. E., Malo, A., McLinden, C. A. & D’Amours, R. Direct injection of water vapor into the stratosphere by volcanic eruptions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 7694–7700 (2016).
Joshi, M. M. & Jones, G. S. The climatic effects of the direct injection of water vapour into the stratosphere by large volcanic eruptions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 6109–6118 (2009).
Xu, J., Li, D., Bai, Z., Tao, M. & Bian, J. Large amounts of water vapor were injected into the stratosphere by the Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha’apai volcano eruption. Atmosphere 13, https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/13/6/912 (2022).
Millán, L. et al. The Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha’apai hydration of the stratosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2022GL099381 (2022).
Vömel, H., Evan, S. & Tully, M. Water vapor injection into the stratosphere by Hunga Tonga–Hunga Haapai. Science 377, 1444–1447 (2022).
Khaykin, S. et al. Global perturbation of stratospheric water and aerosol burden by Hunga eruption. Commun. Earth Environ. 3, 316 (2022).
Carn, S. A., Krotkov, N. A., Fisher, B. L. & Li, C. Out of the blue: volcanic SO2 emissions during the 2021–2022 eruptions of Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha’apai (Tonga). Front. Earth Sci. 10, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2022.976962 (2022).
Sellitto, P. et al. Observing the SO2 and sulphate aerosol plumes from the 2022 Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha’apai eruption with IASI. Preprint at https://essopenarchive.org/users/527694/articles/656444-observing-the-so2-and-sulphate-aerosol-plumes-from-the-2022-hunga-tonga-hunga-ha-apai-eruption-with-iasi?commit=5a53a6e96d0f83fb563c8d911e73ea18a9115c1a (2023).
LeGrande, A. N., Tsigaridis, K. & Bauer, S. E. Role of atmospheric chemistry in the climate impacts of stratospheric volcanic injections. Nat. Geosci. 9, 652–655 (2016).
Zhou, W., Leung, L. R. & Lu, J. Linking large-scale double-ITCZ bias to local-scale drizzling bias in climate models. J. Clim. 35, 7965–7979 (2022).
Proud, S. R., Prata, A. T. & Schmauß, S. The January 2022 eruption of Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha’apai volcano reached the mesosphere. Science 378, 554–557 (2022).
Sellitto, P. et al. The unexpected radiative impact of the Hunga Tonga eruption of 15th January 2022. Commun. Earth Environ. 3, 288 (2022).
Legras, B. et al. The evolution and dynamics of the Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha’apai sulfate aerosol plume in the stratosphere. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 22, 14957–14970 (2022).
Brewer, A. W. Evidence for a world circulation provided by the measurements of helium and water vapour distribution in the stratosphere. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 75, 351–363 (1949).
Mote, P. W. et al. An atmospheric tape recorder: The imprint of tropical tropopause temperatures on stratospheric water vapor. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 101, 3989–4006 (1996).
Rosenlof, K. H. et al. Stratospheric water vapor increases over the past half-century. Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 1195–1198 (2001).
Joshi, M. M. & Shine, K. P. A GCM study of volcanic eruptions as a cause of increased stratospheric water vapor. J. Clim. 16, 3525–3534 (2003).
Kinne, S., Toon, O. B. & Prather, M. J. Buffering of stratospheric circulation by changing amounts of tropical ozone a Pinatubo Case Study. Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 1927–1930 (1992).
Löffler, M., Brinkop, S. & Jöckel, P. Impact of major volcanic eruptions on stratospheric water vapour. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 6547–6562 (2016).
Bolot, M. & Fueglistaler, S. Tropical water fluxes dominated by deep convection up to near tropopause levels. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2020GL091471 (2021).
Dessler, A. E. et al. Variations of stratospheric water vapor over the past three decades. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 119, 12,588–12,598 (2014).
Tao, M. et al. Multitimescale variations in modeled stratospheric water vapor derived from three modern reanalysis products. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 6509–6534 (2019).
Evans, S. J., Toumi, R., Harries, J. E., Chipperfield, M. R. & Russell, J. M. Trends in stratospheric humidity and the sensitivity of ozone to these trends. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 103, 8715–8725 (1998).
Nedoluha, G. E. et al. Increases in middle atmospheric water vapor as observed by the halogen occultation experiment and the ground-based water vapor millimeter-wave spectrometer from 1991 to 1997. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 103, 3531–3543 (1998).
Randel, W. J., Wu, F., Oltmans, S. J., Rosenlof, K. & Nedoluha, G. E. Interannual changes of stratospheric water vapor and correlations with tropical tropopause temperatures. J. Atmos. Sci. 61, 2133–2148 (2004).
Fueglistaler, S. et al. The relation between atmospheric humidity and temperature trends for stratospheric water. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 118, 1052–1074 (2013).
Fueglistaler, S. Stepwise changes in stratospheric water vapor? J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 117, https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2012JD017582 (2012).
Kley, D., Russell, J. M. & Phillips, C. SPARC Assessment of Upper Tropospheric and Stratospheric Water Vapour. SPARC Report-2 (WMO, Paris, 2000).
Oltmans, S., Voemel, H., Kley, D., Hofmann, K. P. & Rosenlof, K. Increase in stratospheric water vapor from balloon-borne, frostpoint hygrometer measurements at Washington, DC and Boulder, Colorado. Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 3453–3456 (2000).
Kroll, C. A., Dacie, S., Azoulay, A., Schmidt, H. & Timmreck, C. The impact of volcanic eruptions of different magnitude on stratospheric water vapor in the tropics. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21, 6565–6591 (2021).
Randel, W. J., Wu, F. & Gaffen, D. J. Interannual variability of the tropical tropopause derived from radiosonde data and NCEP reanalyses. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 105, 15509–15523 (2000).
Santer, B. D. et al. Behavior of tropopause height and atmospheric temperature in models, reanalyses, and observations: decadal changes. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 108, ACL 1–1–ACL 1–22 (2003).
Angell, J. K. Stratospheric warming due to Agung, El Chichón, and Pinatubo taking into account the quasi-biennial oscillation. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 102, 9479–9485 (1997).
Randel, W. J., Wu, F., Vömel, H., Nedoluha, G. E. & Forster, P. Decreases in stratospheric water vapor after 2001: links to changes in the tropical tropopause and the Brewer–Dobson circulation. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 111, https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2005JD006744 (2006).
Tang, C. et al. Distribution and trends of the cold-point tropopause over China from 1979 to 2014 based on radiosonde dataset. Atmos. Res. 193, 1–9 (2017).
Considine, D. B., Rosenfield, J. E. & Fleming, E. L. An interactive model study of the influence of the Mount Pinatubo aerosol on stratospheric methane and water trends. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 106, 27711–27727 (2001).
Gettelman, A. et al. Multimodel assessment of the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere: tropics and global trends. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 115, https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2009JD013638 (2010).
Zhou, X., Mann, G. W., Feng, W., Dhomse, S. S. & Chipperfield, M. P. The influence of internal climate variability on stratospheric water vapor increases after large-magnitude explosive tropical volcanic eruptions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2023GL103076 (2023).
Murphy, D. M. & Koop, T. Review of the vapour pressures of ice and supercooled water for atmospheric applications. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 131, 1539–1565 (2005).
Liu, Y. S., Fueglistaler, S. & Haynes, P. H. Advection-condensation paradigm for stratospheric water vapor. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 115, (2010). https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2010JD014352.
Kroll, C. A., Fueglistaler, S., Schmidt, H., Kornblueh, L. & Timmreck, C. The sensitivity of moisture flux partitioning in the cold-point tropopause to external forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2022GL102262 (2023).
Timmreck, C. et al. The Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol Model Intercomparison Project (ISA-MIP): motivation and experimental design. Geosci. Model Dev. 11, 2581–2608 (2018).
Zhu, Y. et al. Perturbations in stratospheric aerosol evolution due to the water-rich plume of the 2022 Hunga–Tonga eruption. Commun. Earth Environ. 3, 248 (2022).
Kroll, C. A., Fueglistaler, S., Schmidt, H., Dauhut, T. & Timmreck, C. The impact of stratospheric aerosol heating on the frozen hydrometeor transport pathways in the tropical tropopause layer. Environ. Res. Lett. 19, 044039 (2024).
Diallo, M. et al. Significant contributions of volcanic aerosols to decadal changes in the stratospheric circulation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 10,780–10,791 (2017).
Garfinkel, C. I., Aquila, V., Waugh, D. W. & Oman, L. D. Time-varying changes in the simulated structure of the Brewer–Dobson circulation. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 1313–1327 (2017).
Fujiwara, M., Manney, G. L., Gray, L. J. & Wright, J. S. SPARC Reanalysis Intercomparison Project (S-RIP). Final Report. Technical Report 10. www.sparc-climate.org/publications/sparc-reports (2022).
Jenkins, S., Smith, C., Allen, M. & Grainger, R. Tonga eruption increases chance of temporary surface temperature anomaly above 1.5 °C. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 127–129 (2023).
Soden, B. J., Wetherald, R. T., Stenchikov, G. L. & Robock, A. Global cooling after the eruption of Mount Pinatubo: a test of climate feedback by water vapor. Science (New York, NY) 296, 727–730 (2002).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Stephan Fueglistaler for discussing the temperature dependence of the frozen moisture contribution to the stratospheric moisture budget with the authors. We thank Pasquale Sellitto, Martin Dameris and Moritz Günther for their detailed and helpful comments on a draft version of this work. We also thank the reviewers for their constructive feedback, which helped to improve the perspective article. Clarissa A. Kroll is supported by an ETH Zurich Postdoctoral Fellowship.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The idea to write this comment arose during a discussion between A.S. and C.A.K., following the C.A.K.'s talk on the indirect pathway. Using her quantification of stratospheric moisture increases after volcanic eruptions as a basis, C.A.K. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Both A.S. and C.A.K. refined it.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Earth & Environment thanks Pasquale Sellitto and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Heike Langenberg. A peer review file is available
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kroll, C.A., Schmidt, A. Indirect stratospheric moisture increase after a Pinatubo-magnitude eruption can be comparable to direct increase after 2022 Hunga. Commun Earth Environ 5, 497 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01651-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01651-w