Attribution of the record-shattering global annual heat in 2023 to human and/or natural factors is fundamentally required for reliable predictions of upcoming global warming and its impacts. An observation-model comparison of global hot areas supports a key role for human-induced climate change, with a small contribution from El Niño.
The World Meteorological Organization has confirmed that “2023 is the warmest year on record, by a huge margin”, with exceptionally high sea surface temperatures around the globe and the lowest Antarctic sea ice extent on record1. According to the report, 2023 annual average global temperature was 1.45 ± 0.12 °C above pre-industrial levels (1850–1900). This is 0.16 °C higher than the previous record in 2016, approaching the Paris Agreement limit of 1.5 °C. The record-shattering global annual heat in 2023 was beyond our expectation and brought unprecedented extreme weather events across the globe including heatwaves, heavy rainfall events, droughts, and wildfire2. For more reliable prediction of upcoming future climates and associated impacts, it is imperative to identify human and natural factors and mechanisms behind the 2023 unprecedented heat and quantify their relative contributions. Important questions will include whether 2023 was just an outlier year due to El Niño and other natural factors like the Hunga Tonga eruption, or whether 2023 temperatures mark a beginning of a new normal state as the result of anthropogenic warming.
Potential contributors
There are a few potential contributors to the unusually warm year 2023. Anthropogenic factors include background long-term global warming in response to increasing atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations. Reduced sulphate aerosol loading in the atmosphere as a result of ship emission regulations3 is a potential contributing factor, but probably only in the hundreds of a degree globally4, insufficient to explain the abrupt increase in global sea surface temperature in 2023.
Important natural factors include El Niño and the Hunga Tonga eruption. The Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha’apai eruption in 2022 has been suggested to explain some of the 2023 extreme warmth. Unlike more common sulfur-rich volcanic eruptions, the Hunga Tonga eruption injected large amounts of water vapour into the stratosphere and thereby could enhance tropospheric warming5. However, its net contribution to global temperature remains to be determined, including careful consideration of the associated aerosol responses6.
El Niño modulates global mean temperature on interannual to interdecadal time scales and extreme El Niño events can raise the global temperature by 0.2 °C above the long-term trend line7,8. After a triple-dip La Niña, an El Niño event emerged from July 2023 onwards. Its role in the 2023 record warmth needs to be understood, as does its impact on 2024 global temperature: El Niño usually exerts a bigger impact in its decaying year.
Area-based exceptionality
Although global mean temperature is an indicator of global warmth, associated impacts can vary depending on regions. Therefore, the same magnitude of global mean temperature increase can imply very different regional impacts. In this regard, a measure of area or population exposure to the unusual extreme event has been assessed, which can better represent local-scale impacts9,10. Here, I assessed the exceptionality of 2023 heat using a simple metric: the fraction of the global area that experienced unusual warmth. In addition, I evaluated human contributions to this warmth by comparing the extent of hot areas in observations with its counterpart in climate model simulations with and without human factors. Finally, I estimated the possible range of El Niño and other natural variability contributions using near-future simulations from the same models. Based on these indicators, anthropogenic global warming likely played a dominant role, explaining at least two-thirds of the unusually large global area of exceptional warmth in 2023.
Unprecedented widespread warming
2023 was exceptional in terms of the size of the area affected by unusual warming. To measure global area with unusual heat, I compiled the area fraction of the global surface where annual average temperature anomalies were larger than two standard deviations using the ERA5 reanalysis data11. Figure 1a shows the spatial pattern of annual mean temperature anomalies in 2023 relative to the 1981–2010 averages. Widespread warmth occurred over large parts of both land and ocean. Comparison with the anomaly pattern from 2016, the previous warmest year (Fig. 1b), clearly shows the exceptionality of the 2023 global heat. Aside from the equatorial Eastern Pacific that reflects the developing El Niño, the subtropical North Atlantic, western tropical Pacific, mid-latitude North Pacific, and several mid-latitude Southern Ocean regions exhibit unusual warming exceeding two standard deviations.
Interestingly, 2023 hotspot regions do not overlap with those of 2016, except the western tropical Pacific. Considering that 2016 was the year after the peak of an extreme El Niño event, this difference in hot areas suggests that the contribution from El Niño to the 2023 extreme warmth was small.
Overall, about 42% of the globe experienced heat (defined as more than two standard deviations) in 2023, surpassing the 2016 record of about 32% by a large margin (Fig. 1c). Extreme heat (defined as three standard deviations exceedance) occupied about 13% of the global surface in 2023, almost doubling the 2016 area of about 7%. Area fractions measured for global land or ocean only exhibit similar percentages to the global results (not shown), indicating the strong land-ocean connection. Although individual basin surface temperatures will be affected by region-specific natural variabilities such as the Atlantic Multidecadal Variability for the North Atlantic12, strong warming over most of the global ocean basins would not occur in the same year without systematic large-scale influences.
Human versus natural forcing contribution
The question arises whether global climate models capture the observed sudden expansion of heat in 2023. Surprisingly, in simulations that combine historical data up to 2015 with an intermediate emissions pathway (SSP2-4.5) up to 2023, the area fraction for heat (Fig. 1c) and extreme heat (Fig. 1d) follows the observed time series quite well. In these simulations, conducted using twelve Global Climate Models with emissions scenarios that are closely aligned with policies based on the nationally determined contributions to achieving the Paris Climate Goals13, the area fraction exposed to heat shows steady increases after around 2010 and becomes >30% in 2023. Inter-model ranges cover the observations throughout the time series including the 2023 and 2016 extreme values. Results based on thresholds for extreme heat are also consistent (Fig. 1d).
This agreement between 2023 observations and climate-model simulations implies that the heat observed in 2023 may not be unexpected in view of existing model projections. This holds especially when taking into account that the preceding triple-dip La Niña may have hindered increases of global temperature and hot areas during 2021–2022, which probably contributed to the relatively abrupt warming in 2023. The projections using intermediate emissions scenarios exhibit almost linear increases of hot areas in the future; according to the projections, more than 60% of the area fraction will fall into this category by 2040.
In the multi-model median, a fraction of 42% of the area affected by heat as observed in 2023, occurs around the year 2030, indicating that this event emerged a few years earlier than projected. In contrast to these simulations with both human and natural influences, model runs with only natural influence show only slight temperature increases during the past few decades, reflecting the slow recovery from the Mount Pinatubo eruption in 199114,15.
Influence of El Niño and other climate variability
To estimate the influence of El Niño on the 2023 extreme growth of heat area, I examined the relation between annual mean area fractions and the annual mean Niño3.4 index—an indicator of El Niño strength—for the period 2011 to 2040. Looking again at the intermediate scenario (SSP2-4.5) simulations from the same twelve models as above, it emerges that during El Niño years areas affected by heat and extreme heat tend to expand by about 4% and 2%, respectively, per 1 °C increase in the Niño3.4 index (Fig. 2a, b). According to this relation, the influence of 2023 El Niño with Niño3.4 index of 0.82 °C on the global area fraction affected by heat would be very small, around 3.4%. Even for the 2015 El Niño—with a Niño3.4 index of 1.46 °C one of the strongest El Niño events—global areas exposed to heat increase by just over 6%. These model-observation comparisons are a tentative first estimate; large uncertainties remain across different years and different model simulations (see dashed lines in Fig. 2), and other internal variabilities can potentially explain up to ±12% of area fractions for heat. Combined, El Niño and other climate variabilities may have contributed the observed 2023 expansion of the area affected by heat up to about 15%—which would leave around 27% that are likely to be dominated by anthropogenic global warming. Uncertainties for extreme heat areas are larger, because of the small sample size.
Avenues for exploration
This quick assessment using an area-based metric suggests that anthropogenic warming had dominant role in the exceptional widespread heat recorded in 2023. This metric captures the observed abrupt expansion of unusual heat into both land and ocean in line with global warming. Yet, the mechanisms responsible for regional and seasonal warming patterns remain to be determined. In particular, accelerated warming in the subsurface North Atlantic and Southern oceans has been suggested as a key player in shaping the 2023 exceptionality12. Subsurface warming in the Southern Ocean could also have led to the exceptional decrease of Antarctic sea ice and possibly triggered a shift to a new low-sea-ice-extent state16.
Various atmospheric and oceanic mechanisms could induce the rapid warming of the ocean’s surface layer regionally. This could include changes in radiative forcing, for example through lower levels of Saharan dust, or reduced ship-emitted sulphate aerosols. Changes in heat fluxes and transport by atmospheric and ocean circulation patterns are other possibilities, including the finding that prevalence of a zonal wave number 3 pattern accompanied the extreme Southern Ocean warming and the record-low Antarctic sea ice17.
To better understand upcoming changes in global and regional temperatures and associated risks of extreme events, it is urgently required to quantify relative and combined contributions of the individual mechanisms to the 2023 exceptionality and also to identify their anthropogenic or natural origins.
Data availability
The ECMWF Reanalysis v5 (ERA5) data is available at https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/dataset/ecmwf-reanalysis-v5. All the CMIP6 model simulation data are publicly available at https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/projects/cmip6/.
References
World Meteorological Organization. WMO confirms that 2023 smashes global temperature record. https://wmo.int/news/media-centre/wmo-confirms-2023-smashes-global-temperature-record (2024).
World Weather Attribution. Climate Change Fuelled Extreme Weather in 2023; Expect More Records in 2024. https://www.worldweatherattribution.org/climate-change-fuelled-extreme-weather-in-2023-expect-more-records-in-2024/ (2023).
Watson-Parris, D. et al. Shipping regulations lead to large reduction in cloud perturbations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2206885119 (2022).
Carbon Brief. Analysis: How Low-Sulphur shipping Rules are Affecting Global Warming. https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-how-low-sulphur-shipping-rules-are-affecting-global-warming/ (2023).
Jenkins, S., Smith, C., Allen, M. & Grainger, R. Tonga eruption increases chance of temporary surface temperature anomaly above 1.5 °C. Nat. Clim. Chang. 13, 127–129 (2023).
Schoeberl, M. R. et al. The estimated climate impact of the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai eruption plume. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2023GL104634 (2023).
Hansen, J. et al. Global temperature change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 14288–14293 (2006).
Hu, S. & Fedorov, A. V. The extreme El Niño of 2015–2016 and the end of global warming hiatus. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 3816–3824 (2017).
Thompson, V. et al. The most at-risk regions in the world for high-impact heatwaves. Nat Commun 14, 2152 (2023).
McMichael, C., Dasgupta, S., Ayeb-Karlsson, S. & Kelman, I. A review of estimating population exposure to sea-level rise and the relevance for migration. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 123005 (2020).
Hersbach, H. et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 146, 1999–2049 (2020).
Kuhlbrodt, T., Swaminathan, R., Ceppi, P. & Wilder, T. A glimpse into the future: the 2023 ocean temperature and sea ice extremes in the context of longer-term climate change. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 105, E474–E485 (2024).
IPCC, 2023: In Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds. Core Writing Team, H. Lee & J. Romero) 35–115. (IPCC, 2023).
Gillett, N. P. et al. The detection and attribution model intercomparison project (DAMIP v1.0) contribution to CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 3685–3697 (2016).
Eyring, V. et al. In Climate change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds. Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) Ch. 3 (IPCC, Cambridge Uni. Press, 2021).
Purich, A. & Doddridge, E. W. Record low antarctic sea ice coverage indicates a new sea ice state. Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 314 (2023).
Lonita, M. Large-scale drivers of the exceptionally low winter antarctic sea ice extent in 2023. Front. Earth Sci. 12, 1333706 (2024).
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by a National Research Foundation of Korea grant from the Korean Government (NRF2021R1A2C300736). The author thanks Yeon-Hee Kim for helping with the analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.K.M. conceptualized the study and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Min, SK. Human influence can explain the widespread exceptional warmth in 2023. Commun Earth Environ 5, 215 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01391-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01391-x
This article is cited by
-
2023 temperatures reflect steady global warming and internal sea surface temperature variability
Communications Earth & Environment (2024)