Abstract
Resonators and resonatorbased oscillators are used in most electronics systems and they are classified as either mechanical or electrical, with fixed or difficulttotune resonant frequencies. Here, we propose an electrosuperlubric spring, whose restoring force between two contacting sliding solid surfaces in the structural superlubric state is linearly dependent on the sliding displacement from the balanced position. We use theoretical analysis and finite element methods to study the restoring force and stability. The stiffness of this electrosuperlubric spring is proportional to the square of the applied electric bias, facilitating continuous tuning from zero to several megahertz or gigahertz for the microscale or nanoscale resonators, respectively. Furthermore, we propose an electrosuperlubric oscillator that is easily operated by varying a pair of harmonic voltages. The resonant frequency, resonant amplitude, quality factor, and maximum resonant speed can be continuously tuned via the applied voltage and bias. These results indicate significant potential in the applications of electrosuperlubric resonators and oscillators.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Microscale resonators, which can be classified into either electric or acoustic type^{1,2}, have attracted considerable research interest due to their broad applications in electromechanical filters^{3}, gyroscopes^{4}, resonant accelerometers^{5} and energy harvesting^{6,7,8}. All electric resonators, like LC resonators, are based on the electronic oscillations in the circuit. Acoustic resonators, which mainly contain microelectromechanical system (MEMS), nanoelectromechanical system (NEMS), and quartz resonators, are based on the interaction of mechanical motion and thermal or acoustic phonons^{1}. Generally, electric resonators have better performance on the integration with IC process than acoustic resonators, while acoustic resonators have much higher quality factor (Qfactor) and lower energy dissipation than electric acoustic resonators, and thus acoustic resonators are widely used in many applications, including Si MEMS clock oscillators in Apple iPhone^{1}.
Largerange tunability of the resonant frequency is among the most desirable functions of resonators. For instance, with emerging wireless communication systems, an extreme resonant frequency tunability enables a single resonator to cover a wide range frequency; such a resonator could replace a series of frequencyfixed resonators, which will reduce costs as well as the size of the device, thereby offering unprecedented configurability^{9,10}. Furthermore, extreme resonant frequency tunability promises an extremely wide range of harvesting energy^{6}, as the resonance frequency of such a device will be able to adapt to the external energy excitation frequency, which means that much more energy can be efficiently harvested than a fixed or a smallrange resonant frequency resonator. There are several techniques for tuning the resonant frequencies of resonators, including piezoelectric^{6,11,12,13}, electrothermal^{3,14,15,16,17} and electrostatic^{18,19,20,21} techniques. Although these existing resonators can tune a certain range of frequencies around the natural resonant frequency, the tuning range is not extreme and the tuning techniques contain additional structures, which is inconvenient for integrated fabrication.
Structural superlubricity (SSL) refers to a state of ultralow friction and zero wear between two contacting solid surfaces^{22,23,24}. Since its first realisation in microscale graphite^{22}, the SSL state has been observed in contact between microscale graphite and hBN, DLC (diamond like carbon), Au, etc.^{25,26,27}, at high speeds (up to 294 \({{{{\rm{ms}}}}}^{1}\))^{28} and for long ranges of sliding (>100 km)^{25}.
In this paper we propose an electrosuperlubric spring (ESLspring), whose restoring force between two contacting sliding solid surfaces in the structural superlubric state is linearly dependent on the sliding displacement from the balanced position. We show that the stiffness of this ESLspring is proportional to the square of the applied electric bias, which provides a highly effective solution to realise extreme tunable range. Furthermore, we propose an ESLoscillator that is easily operated by varying a pair of harmonic voltages, indicating significant potential in the applications of ESLresonators and oscillators.
Results
The principle of ESLspring
Figure 1a, c illustrate the side and top views of the elementary structure of the ESLspring, respectively. We consider an elementary setup, where a rectangular electrode (SLIDER) of length, \(L\), and width, \(W\), and a significantly larger substrate are in contact in the SSL state. The substrate is covered or coated by a dielectric thin film of thickness, \(d\), and relative permittivity, \({\varepsilon }_{{{{\rm{r}}}}},\) on the structure of two rectangular electrodes (Electrodes 1 and 2) of the same width \(W\) and a larger and thicker dielectric material. Electrodes 1 and 2 are placed in a line, namely, on the \(x\)axis (Fig. 1c), and separated by a distance \(s\). In practice, we can transfer a microscale graphite flake, which is conductive, with the selfretracting motion property^{29} to an atomically smooth hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) film, which is a dielectric for forming a robust SSL contact^{27}. Silicon dioxide (SiO_{2}), which is an insulator and can be grown directly via chemical vapour deposition, provides another choice of dielectric thin film.
The SLIDER moves on the substrate (STATOR) in the \(x\)direction in the range of \(x < {L}_{{{{\rm{c}}}}}/2\). By applying a constant electric bias \({V}_{{{{\rm{b}}}}}\) to Electrodes 1 and 2, we demonstrate that the slider will meet a linear restoring force, \(F=–kx\), where \(x\) is the displacement from the balanced position. The slider is located on the upper right over the middle of Electrodes 1 and 2, and \({L}_{{{{\rm{c}}}}}=L–s\) is the overlapping length of SLIDER with Electrodes 1 and 2. Hence, the setup shown in Fig. 1a, c corresponds to a linear spring in the displacement range of \(x < {L}_{{{{\rm{c}}}}}/2\). To demonstrate the above result, as shown in the equivalent circuit diagram in Fig. 1b, we note that the slider forms capacitances \({C}_{1}={C}_{0}(1–\xi )/2\) and \({C}_{2}={C}_{0}(1+\xi )/2,\) with Electrodes 1 and 2, respectively. Here, \({C}_{0}={C}_{1}+{C}_{2}={\varepsilon }_{0}{\varepsilon }_{{{{\rm{r}}}}}{L}_{{{{\rm{c}}}}}W/d\) is the total capacitor, \(\xi =2x/{L}_{{{{\rm{c}}}}}\in (–1,1)\) is the relative displacement, and \({\varepsilon }_{0}\) is the permittivity of vacuum. As detailed in the Supplementary Note 1, the equivalent potential energy, \(U\), of the entire system can be calculated as:
Substituting (1) into the relationship \(F=–\partial U/\partial x\), we obtain the restoring force \(F=–kx\) with the following ESLspring coefficient:
Thus, we introduce a new spring type, called an ESLspring, with a continuously tunable spring coefficient by changing the applied voltage, \({V}_{{{{\rm{b}}}}}\).
To validate the above theoretical relationships, we carried out a finite element simulation on the electric and potential fields, equivalent potential energy, and driving force as functions of the displacement, \(x\), as detailed in the Supplementary Note 2. We assume \(L=W=4{{{\rm{\mu }}}}{{{\rm{m}}}}\), \(d=100{{{\rm{nm}}}},s=1{{{\rm{\mu }}}}{{{\rm{m}}}},\) and \({V}_{{{{\rm{b}}}}}=40{{{\rm{V}}}}\), and set the thicknesses of the slider and substrate at \(200{{{\rm{nm}}}}\) and 4\({{{\rm{\mu }}}}{{{\rm{m}}}}\), respectively. Using SiO_{2} as the dielectric \(({\varepsilon }_{{{{\rm{r}}}}}=3.9)\), we obtain the corresponding simulation results on the potential field (left panel) and electric field (right panel) for five symmetrical displacements of the ESLspring, as depicted in Fig. 1d. The electric field (potential difference) is mainly concentrated in the overlap area between the slider and Electrodes 1 and 2, which means that the electrostatic energy is mainly composed of capacitors \({C}_{1}\) and \({C}_{2}\). Figure 1e, f show the simulation results (solid lines) of the dimensionless equivalent potential energy, \(U/{U}_{0}\), and driving force, \(F/{F}_{0}\), with respect to four different widthtothickness ratios, \(W/d\) (with the same \(W=4{{{\rm{\mu }}}}{{{\rm{m}}}}\)), where \({U}_{0}={C}_{0}{V}_{{{{\rm{b}}}}}^{2}/8\) and \({F}_{0}={C}_{0}{V}_{{{{\rm{b}}}}}^{2}/2{L}_{{{{\rm{c}}}}}\). The linear relationship \(F=–kx\) (black dashed line) is excellent at \(W/d \, > \,40\) because edge effects decrease with increasing \(W/d\). This condition is very easy to achieve through micronanofabrication technology in the SSL state. Further, the linear relationship holds only within the range of \(x < {L}_{{{{\rm{c}}}}}/2\).
However, nonzero frictions in SSL contacts are inevitable, although they are ultralow (by definition). In ambient environments, typical friction forces affecting a sliding 4\({{{\rm{\mu }}}}\)msized graphite flake on substrates in the SSL contacts were measured to be in the range of \(0 \sim 1.0{{{\rm{\mu }}}}{{{\rm{N}}}}\)^{22,23,27,30}. Recently, it was revealed that these frictional forces are mainly caused by interactions between the edges of the flake and adsorptions of the substrates and can be mostly removed through an annealing process^{31}. In comparison, the maximum ESLspring force is equal to \({F}_{{{\max}}}={\varepsilon }_{0}{\varepsilon }_{{{{\rm{r}}}}}W{V}_{{{{\rm{cr}}}}}^{2}/2d\) at \(\xi =\pm 1\) whenever \({V}_{{{{\rm{b}}}}}\) takes its maximum allowed voltage, \({V}_{{{{\rm{cr}}}}}={E}_{{{{\rm{cr}}}}}d\), before the electric breakdown of the dielectric film, where \({E}_{{{{\rm{cr}}}}}\) is the breakdown strength of the dielectric film. According to the theory and experiments of the solid dielectric breakdown^{32}, when the thicknesses of dielectric films are thinner than ~\(4{{{\rm{\mu }}}}{{{\rm{m}}}}\), \({E}_{{{{\rm{cr}}}}}\) and the relative permittivity, \({\varepsilon }_{{{{\rm{r}}}}}\), for most dielectric films can be approximately correlated to a unified form of \({E}_{{{{\rm{cr}}}}}\approx {E}_{0}/\sqrt{{\varepsilon }_{{{{\rm{r}}}}}}\) with \({E}_{0}=2.24\times {10}^{9}{{{{\rm{Vm}}}}}^{–1}\). Therefore, the maximum allowed ESLspring force can be written as \({F}_{{{\max}}}\approx {\varepsilon }_{0}{E}_{0}^{2}Wd/2\), which is interestingly independent of the dielectric film. For example, if we choose \(W=4{{{\rm{\mu }}}}{{{\rm{m}}}}\) and \(d=100{{{\rm{nm}}}}\), we can obtain \({F}_{{{\max}}}\approx 8.9{{{\rm{\mu }}}}{{{\rm{N}}}}\), which is significantly larger than \(1{{{\rm{\mu }}}}{{{\rm{N}}}}\). The corresponding maximum allowed voltage for BaTiO_{3} is \({V}_{{{\max}}}={E}_{{{{\rm{cr}}}}}d\approx 7.1{{{\rm{V}}}}\), which has a normal value of \({\varepsilon }_{{{{\rm{r}}}}}=1,000\) as the dielectric film. The above analysis verifies that the ESLspring is not only physically but also materially feasible. Furthermore, there will be a normal electrostatic force while applying a constant electric bias \({V}_{{{{\rm{b}}}}}\) to Electrodes 1 and 2. However, this would not generate enough additional friction to affect the operation of the ESLresonator due to the extremely low friction coefficient of \( \sim 0.001\) in the SSL contact state (as detailed in Supplementary Note 8).
Using the ESLspring as a resonator, we obtain the (circular) resonance frequency as follows:
where \(m\), \(\rho \) and \(H\) denote the mass, mass density and thickness of the slider, respectively. By taking the maximum allowed voltage, \({V}_{{{{\rm{cr}}}}}\), before the dielectric breakdown and choosing, for instance, \(H=L/10\) and \(s=L/2\), we can obtain the maximum achievable resonance frequency \({\omega }_{{{\max}}}\) in the form \({\omega }_{{{\max}}}={v}_{0}{(d/{L}^{3})}^{1/2}\), where \({v}_{0}={E}_{0}\sqrt{20{\varepsilon }_{0}/\rho }\approx 628{{{{\rm{ms}}}}}^{1}\). Therefore, the resonant frequency can be up to \( \sim25{{{\rm{MHz}}}}\) in the microscale (\(L=4{{{\rm{\mu }}}}{{{\rm{m}}}},d=100{{{\rm{nm}}}}\)) and \( \sim2.5{{{\rm{GHz}}}}\) in the nanoscale (\(L=40{{{\rm{nm}}}},d=1{{{\rm{nm}}}}\)). Since the tunable frequency range of ESLspring resonator is much smaller than the natural frequency of the graphite flake (\(1.7{{{\rm{GHz}}}}\) for micro scale and \(170{{{\rm{GHz}}}}\) for nano scale), we ignored the deformation of graphite in the above analysis (see Supplementary Note 7).
The tunable range comparison between different types of resonators
As demonstrated above, one of the most remarkable features of the ESLresonator is its widely tunable range of resonant frequencies^{10}. For comparison, Fig. 2a summarises some representative tunable ranges reported in the literature and the tunable range of the ESLresonator. To better comprehend the advantage of the tunability of the ESLresonator, we also plot the relative tuning ranges of \(({\omega }_{{{\max}}}–{\omega }_{{{\min }}})/{\omega }_{{{\max}}}\) in Fig. 2b, where \({\omega }_{{{\max}}}\) and \({\omega }_{{{\min }}}\) denote the maximum and minimum tunable resonant frequencies, respectively. These comparison results demonstrate the superiority of the ESLresonator in terms of tunability.
The stability of ESLresonators
In the setup of the ESLresonator shown in Fig. 1a, c, there is no mechanical constraint to the motions of the slider in either the lateral direction (i.e., the \(y\)axis) or in the \(x\)O\(y\) rotational plane. The introduction of such a mechanical constraint is undesirable, as it not only increases the structural complexity and cost but also induces additional and often significant friction. Therefore, a fundamental question to ask is whether the kinetics of such a freeconstrained slider are stable.
Hereafter, we theoretically demonstrate the kinetic robustness of the ESLresonator. Figure 3a illustrates the top view of the ESLresonator; the slider moves to a deviating position characterised by a coordinate in the \((x,y,\theta )\)phase space with \(y\,\ne\,0\) and/or \(\theta \,\ne\, 0\). To simplify the kinetic stability analysis, we introduce three dimensionless parameters, \(\xi =2x/{L}_{{{{\rm{c}}}}},\eta =y/W,\,{{{\rm{and}}}}\,\gamma =2\theta /\pi ,\) which are all constrained in the range of \((–1,1)\). The two capacitors denoted by \({C}_{1}\) and \({C}_{2}\), formed between the slider and Electrodes 1 and 2, respectively, can be expressed as \({C}_{1}={\varepsilon }_{0}{\varepsilon }_{r}{A}_{1}/d\) and \({C}_{2}={\varepsilon }_{0}{\varepsilon }_{r}{A}_{2}/d\), where \({A}_{1}(\xi ,\eta ,\gamma )\) and \({A}_{2}(\xi ,\eta ,\gamma )\) are the overlapping areas between the slider and Electrodes 1 and 2, respectively. We can express the equivalent potential energy, \(U\), of the system in the form of the first relationship in Eq. (1), yielding:
where the function \(g(\xi ,\eta ,\gamma )\) represents the normalised energy that degenerates \(g(\xi ,0,0)={\xi }^{2}–1\) and is determined by \({A}_{1}\) and \({A}_{2}\). Mathematically, whenever the normalised energy \(g(\xi ,\eta ,\gamma )\) is at a minimum at \((\xi ,0,0)\), the kinetic system of the slider is stable at \((\xi ,0,0).\)
We use numerical methods to calculate \(g(\xi ,\eta ,\gamma )\) for different \(\xi ,\eta \), and \(\gamma \), all in the range of \((–1,1)\), as detailed in the Supplementary Note 4. Figure 3b–d show the normalised energy surfaces of \(g=g({\xi }_{0},\eta ,\gamma )\) for \({\xi }_{0}=0.0,0.4,0.8,\) respectively, and two typical size ratios \(W/L=0.5\) and \(s/L=0.2\). We can clearly see that the energy is always at its minimum at \(\eta =\gamma =0\), as the slider is nonrotationally moved along the \(x\)direction. This means that the slider suffers restrains on the \(y\) and \(\theta \) directions while moving. Hence, the kinetics of such a freeconstrained slider are stable. The abovecharacterised motion robustness is valid for other values of \({\xi }_{0},\) \(W/L\) and \(s/L\), when \({\xi }_{0}\) is not too large, as explained in the Supplementary Note 4.
The application of ESLresonators to ESLoscillators
To apply the abovementioned ESLresonator as an oscillator, a major challenge is to apply a stimulating load without affecting the SSL state. To solve this problem, we propose another elementary setup, as illustrated in Fig. 4a, where the STATOR is formed by inserting a middle electrode (Electrode m) with length \(a\), width \(W\), and separation distance \(s/2\) between Electrodes 1 and 2. We shall further show that when choosing the pair of voltages \({V}_{1}\) and \({V}_{2}\) between Electrode m and Electrodes 1 and 2, respectively, in the alternative forms \({V}_{1}={V}_{0}\,\sin \,{\omega }_{{{{\rm{e}}}}}t+{V}_{{{{\rm{b}}}}}/2,{V}_{2}={V}_{0}\,\sin \,{\omega }_{{{{\rm{e}}}}}t–{V}_{{{{\rm{b}}}}}/2,\) the setup will become an oscillator stimulated by the harmonic voltage \({V}_{0}\,\sin \,{\omega }_{{{{\rm{e}}}}}t\) with a resonant frequency that is continuously tuned by changing the bias potential \({V}_{{{{\rm{b}}}}}\). The slider will form capacitors \({C}_{1}\), \({C}_{{{{\rm{m}}}}}\) and \({C}_{2}\) with Electrodes 1, m and 2, respectively, and the equivalent circuit diagram is shown in Fig. 4b. As detailed in the Supplementary Note 5, the dynamic equation of the slider can be expressed as \(m\ddot{x}+c\dot{x}+kx={F}_{{{{\rm{ex}}}}}\,\sin \,{\omega }_{{{{\rm{e}}}}}t,\) where \(m\) is the mass of the slider, \(c\) is the mechanical damping (much larger than ohmic loss and dielectric loss; see Supplementary Note 6), and \(k\) is the spring coefficient, which has exactly the same form as in Eq. (2),
denoting the excitation force with \({L}_{{{{\rm{c}}}}}=L–s\).
Based on a physically meaningful understanding of Eq. (5), we can reform it to \({F}_{{{{\rm{ex}}}}}={Q}_{{{{\rm{m}}}}}{E}_{{{{\rm{ho}}}}}\), where \({Q}_{{{{\rm{m}}}}}={C}_{{{{\rm{m}}}}}{V}_{0}\) can represent an equivalent charge of the middle capacitor \({C}_{{{{\rm{m}}}}}={\varepsilon }_{0}{\varepsilon }_{{{{\rm{r}}}}}Wa/d\) excited by the voltage \({V}_{0}\), and \({E}_{{{{\rm{ho}}}}}={V}_{{{{\rm{b}}}}}/{L}_{{{{\rm{c}}}}}\) can correspond to an equivalent horizontal electric field formed by the bias voltage, \({V}_{{{{\rm{b}}}}}.\). This understanding endows the physical picture, where the force \({F}_{{{{\rm{ex}}}}}\) is electrostatically applied to the charge \({Q}_{{{{\rm{m}}}}}\) in the electric field \({E}_{{{{\rm{ho}}}}}\).
By solving the dynamic equation, we can obtain the resonance amplitude, \({A}_{{{{\rm{os}}}}}\); velocity, \({v}_{{{{\rm{os}}}}}\); and Qfactor, \(Q,\) as:
where \({c}_{1}=c/W\) represents the damping per unit width. To intuitively display the performance of the ESLoscillator, we plot the above performance parameters for \({\varepsilon }_{{{{\rm{r}}}}}=3.9,W=L=4{{{\rm{\mu }}}}{{{\rm{m}}}},s=1{{{\rm{\mu }}}}{{{\rm{m}}}},a=1{{{\rm{\mu }}}}{{{\rm{m}}}},H=200{{{\rm{nm}}}},d=20{{{\rm{nm}}}},\rho =2.16{{{{\rm{gcm}}}}}^{3},\;{{{\rm{and}}}}c=1.2\times {10}^{–11}{{{{\rm{kgs}}}}}^{1}\)^{33,34}, as shown in Fig. 4c–e; the damping coefficient, \(c\), is estimated in the Supplementary Note 5.
The spring coefficient, \(k\), is independent of \({V}_{0}\), and the electric excitation force, \({F}_{{{{\rm{ex}}}}}\), depends on the product \(a{V}_{0}\). However, different choices of \(a\) affect the maximum allowed oscillation amplitude, \(x \, < \,({L}_{{{{\rm{c}}}}}–a)/2\). The Qfactor increases with decreasing \(d\) in the form \( \sim {d}^{1/2}\), which implies a remarkable advantage of using nanometrethick dielectric films to separate the SLIDER and underlying electrodes.
The advantages of ESLresonators and ESLoscillators
We point out two additional remarkable advantages of ESLresonators and ESLoscillators. First, MEMS resonators constitute a type of mechanical resonator that has a compact size, high sensitivity, high resolution, and low cost [1,2]. Because most MEMS resonators are based on cantilevers, the allowed maximum relative displacement of the cantilevers is relatively small, typically less than \(1/10\) the length of the cantilever owing to the pullin phenomenon^{35,36,37}. This largely restricts the scope of MEMS applications in some important devices, such as energyharvesting devices^{6} and microgyroscopes. In comparison, the ESLoscillator allows significantly larger relative sliding displacements. In fact, the maximum allowed displacement, \({x}_{{{\max}}}\), is equal to \(({L}_{c}a)/2\), which is of the same order as the ESLoscillator size. This unique property promises applications of ESLoscillators with better performance capabilities than those of MEMS in energyharvesting devices^{6} and microgyroscopes (as detailed in Supplementary Note 9).
Second, the restoring force of the ESLspring is strictly linear, which results in good harmonic vibration dynamic characteristics of ESLoscillators at any voltage. In contrast, the additional restoring forces of the conventual tunable resonators and oscillators are often nonlinear^{6,18}, which leads to nonharmonic vibrations and often affects the performance of the resonators and oscillators.
Conclusions
In summary, using structural superlubricity, a recently introduced technology, we proposed one type of linear spring, called an electrosuperlubric spring (ESLspring), which possesses a unique feature of continuously tunable spring stiffness by alteration of the applied bias voltage. This suggests the future development of ESLresonators and ESLoscillators with continuously tunable resonant frequencies in the range from zero to several MHz for microscale ESLresonators and from zero to several GHz for nanoscale ESLresonators. Moreover, the relative displacement amplitudes of ESLresonators can largely exceed those of mechanical ones. Therefore, the commercialisation of ESLresonators can be expected to be realised in the near future, which will lead to their broad application. However, the experimental results are not yet accomplished; this remains to be addressed in future studies.
Methods
Finite element simulations of the ESLspring
In order to verify the theoretical model of ESLspring in Supplementary Note 1 and take into account the influence of edge effect, we develop a finite element model to simulate the structure in Fig. 1. At the boundary, a large area of air is set outside, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 2a, while the zerocharge boundary condition is set on the outside boundary of air (See Supplementary Eq. (S13)). Simultaneously, all electrodes are equipotential; and the voltage of Electrode 1 is set to 0 V, and the voltage of Electrode 2 is set to 40 V, which is equivalent to applying a constant voltage \({V}_{{{{\rm{b}}}}}=40{{{\rm{V}}}}\). For the Electrode 0, we give it a zerototal charge condition, as Supplementary Equation (S14) shows. The whole region is solved by the Maxwell equation in electrostatic field, as details in Supplementary Eq. (S15).
Calculating the overlap area of Slider and Electrodes
Here, we need to use a numerical method to calculate \({A}_{1}(\xi ,\eta ,\gamma )\) and \({A}_{2}(\xi ,\eta ,\gamma )\). Firstly, we divide the area of Electrode 0 into \(N\times N\) (here \(N=500\)) elements uniformly, as illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 3. The position of each element is discretized as a point (\(\frac{{x}_{0}^{(i,j)}L}{2},\frac{{y}_{0}^{(i,j)}W}{2}\)), in which \({x}_{0}^{(i,j)}\) and \({y}_{0}^{(i,j)}\) is defined as Supplementary Eq. (S16). Then, when Electrode 0 produces the displacement \((\xi ,\eta ,\gamma )\), we can calculate \((i,j)\)th element’s position in the global coordinate system \(x\)O\(y\) using Supplementary Eq. (S17). Next, we just need to judge each element whether it is in the area where Electrode1&2 are located, to determine whether it belongs to the overlap area \({A}_{1}\) and \({A}_{2}\) by Supplementary Eq. (S18). Then we can use Supplementary Eq. (S19) to obtain the overlap area.
Data availability
The data that support the plots within this paper and other finding of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
References
Tabrizian, R., Raiszadeh, M. & Ayazi, F. Effect of phonon interactions on limiting the f.Q product of micromechanical resonators. TRANSDUCERS 2009–2009 International SolidState Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference. p. 2131–2134 (IEEE, 2009).
van Beek, J. T. M. & Puers, R. A review of MEMS oscillators for frequency reference and timing applications. J. Micromech. Microeng. https://doi.org/10.1088/09601317/22/1/013001 (2012).
Svilicic, B., Mastropaolo, E. & Cheung, R. Widely tunable MEMS ring resonator with electrothermal actuation and piezoelectric sensing for filtering applications. Sens. Actuat A Phys. 226, 149–153 (2015).
Sonmezoglu, S., Alper, S. E. & Akin, T. An automatically modematched MEMS gyroscope with wide and tunable bandwidth. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 23, 284–297 (2014).
Roessig, T. A., Howe, R. T., Pisano, A. P. & Smith, J. H. Surfacemicromachined Resonant Accelerometer (IEEE, 1997).
Peters, C., Maurath, D., Schock, W., Mezger, F. & Manoli, Y. A closedloop widerange tunable mechanical resonator for energy harvesting systems. J. Micromech. Microeng. https://doi.org/10.1088/09601317/19/9/094004 (2009).
Harne, R. L. & Wang, K. W. A review of the recent research on vibration energy harvesting via bistable systems. Smart Mater. Struct. https://doi.org/10.1088/09641726/22/2/023001 (2013).
Amri, M. et al. Stiffness control of a nonlinear mechanical folded beam for wideband vibration energy harvesters. TMTech. Mess. 85, 553–564 (2018).
Entesari, K. & Rebeiz, G. M. A differential 4bit 6.510GHz RF MEMS tunable filter. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 53, 1103–1110 (2005).
Zhang, W.M., Hu, K.M., Peng, Z.K. & Meng, G. Tunable micro and nanomechanical resonators. Sensors 15, 26478–26566 (2015).
Piazza, G., Abdolvand, R., Ho, G. K. & Ayazi, F. Voltagetunable piezoelectricallytransduced singlecrystal silicon micromechanical resonators. Sens. Actuat. A Phys. 111, 71–78 (2004).
Roundy, S. & Zhang, Y. In Smart Structures, Devices, and Systems II, Pt 1 and 2 Vol. 5649 Proceedings of the Society of PhotoOptical Instrumentation Engineers (Spie) (ed. S. F. AlSarawi) 373–384 (2005).
Olivares, J. et al. Mems, Moems, and Micromachining Ii Vol. 6186 Proceedings of SPIE (eds H. Urey & A. ElFatatry) (Society of Photo Optical, 2006).
Mastropaolo, E., Wood, G. S., Gual, I., Parmiter, P. & Cheung, R. Electrothermally actuated silicon carbide tunable mems resonators. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 21, 811–821 (2012).
Svilicic, B., Mastropaolo, E., Flynn, B. & Cheung, R. Electrothermally actuated and piezoelectrically sensed silicon carbide tunable MEMS resonator. IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 33, 278–280 (2012).
Svilicic, B., Mastropaolo, E., Zhang, R. & Cheung, R. Tunable MEMS cantilever resonators electrothermally actuated and piezoelectrically sensed. Microelectron. Eng. 145, 38–42 (2015).
Kazmi, S. N. R. et al. Tunable nanoelectromechanical resonator for logic computations. Nanoscale 9, 3449–3457 (2017).
Adams, S. G. et al. Capacitance based tunable resonators. J. Micromech. Microeng. 8, 15–23 (1998).
Eriksson, A. et al. Direct transmission detection of tunable mechanical resonance in an individual carbon nanofiber relay. Nano Lett. 8, 1224–1228 (2008).
Morgan, B. & Ghodssi, R. Verticallyshaped tunable MEMS resonators. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 17, 85–92 (2008).
Chen, C. et al. Graphene mechanical oscillators with tunable frequency. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 923–927 (2013).
Liu, Z. et al. Observation of microscale superlubricity in graphite. Phys. Rev. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.205503 (2012).
Hod, O., Meyer, E., Zheng, Q. & Urbakh, M. Structural superlubricity and ultralow friction across the length scales. Nature 563, 485–492 (2018).
Zheng, Q. Superlubricity: the world of ‘0’ friction. Sci. Technol. Rev. 34, 12–26 (2016).
Peng, D. 100 km wearfree sliding achieved by microscale superlubric graphite/DLC heterojunctions under ambient conditions. Natl. Sci. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwab109 (2021).
Shigeki Kawai, A. B. et al. Superlubricity of graphene nanoribbons on gold surfaces. Science 351, 957–961 (2016).
Song, Y. et al. Robust microscale superlubricity in graphite/hexagonal boron nitride layered heterojunctions. Nat. Mater. 17, 894–899 (2018).
Peng, D. et al. Loadinduced dynamical transitions at graphene interfaces. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 12618–12623 (2020).
Zheng, Q. et al. Selfretracting motion of graphite microflakes. Phys. Rev. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.067205 (2008).
Yang, J. et al. Observation of highspeed microscale superlubricity in graphite. Phys. Rev. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.255504 (2013).
Wang, W. et al. Measurement of the cleavage energy of graphite. Nat. Commun. 6, 7 (2015).
Neusel, C. & Schneider, G. A. Sizedependence of the dielectric breakdown strength from nano to millimeter scale. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 63, 201–213 (2014).
Wang, K., Qu, C., Wang, J., Quan, B. & Zheng, Q. Characterization of a microscale superlubric graphite interface. Phys. Rev. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.026101 (2020).
Qu, C. et al. Origin of friction in superlubric graphite contacts. Phys. Rev. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.126102 (2020).
Dequesnes, M., Rotkin, S. V. & Aluru, N. R. Calculation of pullin voltages for carbonnanotubebased nanoelectromechanical switches. Nanotechnology 13, 120–131 (2002).
Nayfeh, A. H., Younis, M. I. & AbdelRahman, E. M. Dynamic pullin phenomenon in MEMS resonators. Nonlinear Dyn. 48, 153–163 (2007).
Zhang, W.M., Yan, H., Peng, Z.K. & Meng, G. Electrostatic pullin instability in MEMS/NEMS: a review Sens. Actuat. APhys. 214, 187–218 (2014).
Acknowledgements
Q.Z. wishes to acknowledge the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11572173, 11890671 and 51961145304), the National Key Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2013CB934200), the Cyrus Tang Foundation (Grant No. 202003), the Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (Program No. Z151100003315008), the Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research (Program Nos. 2014z01007 and 2012Z01015) and the State Key Laboratory of Tribology Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research (Program No. SKLT2019D02). We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Z.W. and X. H. designed and analysed the resonators. Z.W., X.H. and X.X. discussed and proposed the idea. Q.Z. supervised the project. Z.W., X.H. and Q.Z. wrote the paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Communications Materials thanks Ghader Rezazadeh and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Aldo Isidori. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, Z., Huang, X., Xiang, X. et al. Electrosuperlubric springs for continuously tunable resonators and oscillators. Commun Mater 2, 104 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246021002071
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246021002071
This article is cited by

Conductive edgewarping graphite mesas for robust structural superlubricity
Science China Technological Sciences (2024)

Fully automatic transfer and measurement system for structural superlubric materials
Nature Communications (2023)

Robust microscale structural superlubricity between graphite and nanostructured surface
Nature Communications (2023)

Nonlinear dynamics of a tunable novel accelerometer, tunable with a microtriple electrode variable capacitor
Acta Mechanica (2023)