Earth’s magnetic field is generated by fluid motions in the outer core. This geodynamo has operated for over 3.4 billion years. However, the mechanism that has sustained the geodynamo for over 75% of Earth’s history remains debated. In this Review, we assess the mechanisms proposed to drive the geodynamo (precession, tides and convection) and their ability to match geomagnetic and palaeomagnetic observations. Flows driven by precession are too weak to drive the geodynamo. Flows driven by tides could have been strong enough in the early Earth, before 1.5 billion years ago, when tidal deformation and Earth’s spin rate were larger than they are today. Evidence that the thermal conductivity of Earth’s core could be as high as 250 W m−1 K−1 calls the ability of convection to maintain the dynamo for over 3.4 billion years into question. Yet, convection could supply enough power to sustain a long-lived geodynamo if the thermal conductivity is lower than 100 W m−1 K−1. Exsolution of light elements from the core increases this upper conductivity limit by 15% to 200%, based on the exsolution rates reported so far. Convection, possibly aided by the exsolution of light elements, remains the mechanism most likely to have sustained the geodynamo. The light-element exsolution rate, which remains poorly constrained, should be further investigated.
Numerical models of the geodynamo driven by thermo-chemical convection account for most of the observed properties of the present geodynamo.
The thermal conductivity in Earth’s core remains debated, with published values ranging between 20 and 250 W m−1 K−1. With a conductivity as high as 250 W m−1 K−1, motionless heat transport would prevail in the core implying that convection would not be able to sustain Earth’s magnetic dynamo for 3.4 billion years (Gyr).
Nevertheless, thermo-chemical convection caused by the slow cooling of Earth supplies enough power to the geodynamo when the thermal conductivity is lower than 100 W m−1 K−1. The exsolution of light elements increases this upper conductivity limit only marginally or by up to a factor of three, depending on the exsolution rate.
Flows driven by precession are too weak to drive the geodynamo.
Flows driven by tides could have been strong enough before 1.5 Gyr ago, when tidal deformation and Earth’s spin rate were larger than today, which calls for further investigation of tidally driven dynamos.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to Nature and 55 other Nature journal
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $6.58 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Lundin, R., Lammer, H. & Ribas, I. Planetary magnetic fields and solar forcing: implications for atmospheric evolution. Space Sci. Rev. 129, 245–278 (2007).
Lammer, H. et al. Coronal mass ejection (CME) activity of low mass M stars as an important factor for the habitability of terrestrial exoplanets. II. CME-induced ion pick up of Earth-like exoplanets in close-in habitable zones. Astrobiology 7, 185–207 (2007).
Gunell, H. et al. Why an intrinsic magnetic field does not protect a planet against atmospheric escape. Astron. Astrophys. 614, L3 (2018).
Lohmann, K., Putman, N. & Lohmann, C. Geomagnetic imprinting: a unifying hypothesis of long-distance natal homing in salmon and sea turtles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 19096–19101 (2008).
Benhamou, S. et al. The role of geomagnetic cues in green turtle open sea navigation. PLoS ONE 6, e26672 (2011).
Rismani Yazdi, S. et al. Magnetotaxis enables magnetotactic bacteria to navigate in flow. Small 14, 1870019 (2018).
Roque, B., Rosselli, A., Mitchell, C. & Petroff, A. Control of multicellular magnetotactic bacteria with a magnetic field. In APS March Meeting Abstracts, L70.321 (American Physical Society, 2019).
Larmor, J. How could a rotating body such as the Sun become a magnet? In Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science Vol. 87, 159–160 (1919).
Roberts, P. H. & King, E. M. On the genesis of the Earth’s magnetism. Rep. Prog. Phys. 76, 096801 (2013).
Christensen, U. R., Aubert, J. & Hulot, G. Conditions for Earth-like geodynamo models. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 296, 487–496 (2010).
Schaeffer, N., Jault, D., Nataf, H.-C. & Fournier, A. Turbulent geodynamo simulations: a leap towards Earth’s core. Geophys. J. Int. 211, 1–29 (2017).
Aubert, J., Gastine, T. & Fournier, A. Spherical convective dynamos in the rapidly rotating asymptotic regime. J. Fluid Mech. 813, 558–593 (2017).
Sheyko, A., Finlay, C., Favre, J. & Jackson, A. Scale separated low viscosity dynamos and dissipation within the Earth’s core. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–7 (2018).
Aubert, J. & Finlay, C. C. Geomagnetic jerks and rapid hydromagnetic waves focusing at Earth’s core surface. Nat. Geosci. 12, 393–398 (2019).
Aubert, J. & Gillet, N. The interplay of fast waves and slow convection in geodynamo simulations nearing Earth’s core conditions. Geophys. J. Int. 225, 1854–1873 (2021).
Tarduno, J. A. et al. Geodynamo, solar wind, and magnetopause 3.4 to 3.45 billion years ago. Science 327, 1238–1240 (2010).
Olson, P. The new core paradox. Science 342, 431–432 (2013).
Konôpková, Z., McWilliams, R. S., Gómez-Pérez, N. & Goncharov, A. F. Direct measurement of thermal conductivity in solid iron at planetary core conditions. Nature 534, 99–101 (2016).
Hasegawa, A., Yagi, T. & Ohta, K. Combination of pulsed light heating thermoreflectance and laser-heated diamond anvil cell for in-situ high pressure-temperature thermal diffusivity measurements. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90, 074901 (2019).
Hsieh, W.-P. et al. Low thermal conductivity of iron-silicon alloys at Earth’s core conditions with implications for the geodynamo. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–7 (2020).
Stacey, F. D. & Anderson, O. L. Electrical and thermal conductivities of Fe–Ni–Si alloy under core conditions. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 124, 153–162 (2001).
Stacey, F. D. & Loper, D. E. A revised estimate of the conductivity of iron alloy at high pressure and implications for the core energy balance. Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 161, 13–18 (2007).
de Koker, N., Steinle-Neumann, G. & Vlček, V. Electrical resistivity and thermal conductivity of liquid Fe alloys at high P and T, and heat flux in Earth’s core. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 4070–4073 (2012).
Pozzo, M., Davies, C., Gubbins, D. & Alfè, D. Thermal and electrical conductivity of iron at Earth’s core conditions. Nature 485, 355–358 (2012).
Gomi, H. et al. The high conductivity of iron and thermal evolution of the Earth’s core. Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 224, 88–103 (2013).
Ohta, K., Kuwayama, Y., Hirose, K., Shimizu, K. & Ohishi, Y. Experimental determination of the electrical resistivity of iron at Earth’s core conditions. Nature 534, 95–98 (2016).
Labrosse, S. Thermal evolution of the core with a high thermal conductivity. Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 247, 36–55 (2015).
Davies, C. Cooling history of Earth’s core with high thermal conductivity. Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 247, 65–79 (2015).
Buffett, B. A., Garnero, E. J. & Jeanloz, R. Sediments at the top of Earth’s core. Science 290, 1338–1342 (2000).
Badro, J., Siebert, J. & Nimmo, F. An early geodynamo driven by exsolution of mantle components from Earth’s core. Nature 536, 326–328 (2016).
O’Rourke, J. & Stevenson, D. Powering Earth’s dynamo with magnesium precipitation from the core. Nature 529, 387–389 (2016).
Malkus, W. V. R. Precession of the Earth as the cause of geomagnetism. Science 160, 259–264 (1968).
Stacey, F. The coupling of the core to the precession of the Earth. Geophys. J. Int. 33, 47–55 (1973).
Loper, D. E. Torque balance and energy budget for the precessionally driven dynamo. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 11, 43–60 (1975).
Rochester, M. G., Jacobs, J. A., Smylie, D. E. & Chong, K. F. Can precession power the geomagnetic dynamo? Geophys. J. Int. 43, 661–678 (1975).
Le Bars, M., Lacaze, L., Le Dizes, S., Le Gal, P. & Rieutord, M. Tidal instability in stellar and planetary binary systems. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 178, 48–55 (2010).
Grannan, A., Le Bars, M., Cébron, D. & Aurnou, J. Experimental study of global-scale turbulence in a librating ellipsoid. Phys. Fluids 26, 126601 (2014).
Lin, Y., Noir, J. & Jackson, A. Experimental study of fluid flows in a precessing cylindrical annulus. Phys. Fluids 26, 046604 (2014).
Lemasquerier, D. et al. Libration-driven flows in ellipsoidal shells. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 122, 1926–1950 (2017).
Tilgner, A. Precession driven dynamos. Phys. Fluids 17, 034104 (2005).
Wu, C.-C. & Roberts, P. H. On a dynamo driven topographically by longitudinal libration. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 107, 20–44 (2013).
Ernst-Hullermann, J., Harder, H. & Hansen, U. Finite volume simulations of dynamos in ellipsoidal planets. Geophys. J. Int. 195, 1395–1405 (2013).
Lin, Y., Marti, P., Noir, J. & Jackson, A. Precession-driven dynamos in a full sphere and the role of large scale cyclonic vortices. Phys. Fluids 28, 066601 (2016).
Andrault, D., Monteux, J., Le Bars, M. & Samuel, H. The deep Earth may not be cooling down. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 443, 195–203 (2016).
Hulot, G., Olsen, N., Sabaka, T. J. & Fournier, A. in Geomagnetism, Treatise on Geophysics 2nd edn, Vol. 5 (eds Kono, M. & Schubert, G.) 33–78 (Elsevier, 2015).
Alken, P. et al. International geomagnetic reference field: the 13th generation. Earth Planets Space 73, 49 (2021).
Olsen, N., Hulot, G. & Sabaka, T. J. Sources of the geomagnetic field and the modern data that enable their investigation. In Handbook of Geomathematics (eds Freeden, W., Nashed, M. Z. & Sonar, T.) 105–124 (Springer, 2010).
Jonkers, A. R. T., Jackson, A. & Murray, A. Four centuries of geomagnetic data from historical records. Rev. Geophys. 41, 1006 (2003).
Jackson, A. & Finlay, C. C. in Geomagnetism, Treatise on Geophysics 2nd edn, Vol. 5 (eds Kono, M. & Schubert, G.) 137–184 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2015).
Gillet, N., Jault, D. & Finlay, C. C. Planetary gyre, time-dependent eddies, torsional waves, and equatorial jets at the Earth’s core surface. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 120, 3991–4013 (2015).
Gillet, N., Jault, D., Canet, E. & Fournier, A. Fast torsional waves and strong magnetic field within the Earth’s core. Nature 465, 74–77 (2010).
Braginsky, S. I. & Roberts, P. H. Equations governing convection in Earth’s core and the geodynamo. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 79, 1–97 (1995).
Holme, R. in Core Dynamics, Treatise on Geophysics 2nd edn, Vol. 8 (eds Olson, P. & Schubert, G.) 91–113 (Elsevier, 2015).
Channell, J. E. T., Kent, D. V., Lowrie, W. & Meert, J. G. Timescales of the Paleomagnetic Field Vol. 145 (American Geophysical Union, 2004).
Gallet, Y. et al. On the use of archeology in geomagnetism, and vice-versa: recent developments in archeomagnetism. C. R. Phys. 10, 630–648 (2009).
Evans, D. A. D. Reconstructing pre-Pangean supercontinents. GSA Bull. 125, 1735–1751 (2013).
Nichols, C. et al. Hints of an Eoarchean magnetic field from the Isua Supracrustal Belt, Greenland. In American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting 2019 Abstract DI14A–02 (American Geophysical Union, 2019).
Tarduno, J., Cottrell, R., Davis, W., Nimmo, F. & Bono, R. A Hadean to Paleoarchean geodynamo recorded by single zircon crystals. Science 349, 521–524 (2015).
Weiss, B. et al. Secondary magnetic inclusions in detrital zircons from the Jack Hills, western Australia, and implications for the origin of the geodynamo. Geology 46, 427–430 (2018).
Olson, P., Deguen, R., Hinnov, L. & Zhong, S. Controls on geomagnetic reversals and core evolution by mantle convection in the Phanerozoic. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 214, 87–103 (2013).
Biggin, A. J. et al. Palaeomagnetic field intensity variations suggest Mesoproterozoic inner-core nucleation. Nature 526, 245–248 (2015).
Smirnov, A. V., Tarduno, J. A., Kulakov, E. V., McEnroe, S. A. & Bono, R. K. Palaeointensity, core thermal conductivity and the unknown age of the inner core. Geophys. J. Int. 205, 1190–1195 (2016).
Valet, J.-P., Besse, J., Kumar, A., Vadakke-Chanat, S. & Philippe, E. The intensity of the geomagnetic field from 2.4 Ga old Indian dykes. Geochem., Geophys.Geosystems 15, 2426–2437 (2014).
Smirnov, A. V., Tarduno, J. A. & Evans, D. A. Evolving core conditions ca. 2 billion years ago detected by paleosecular variation. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 187, 225–231 (2011).
Evans, D. Proterozoic low orbital obliquity and axial-dipolar geomagnetic field from evaporite palaeolatitudes. Nature 444, 51–55 (2006).
Jaupart, C., Labrosse, S., Lucazeau, F. & Mareschal, J.-C. in Mantle Convection, Treatise on Geophysics 2nd edn (eds Bercovici, D. & Schubert, G.) 223–270 (Elsevier, 2015).
McDonough, W. F. & Sun, S.-S. The composition of the Earth. Chem. Geol. 120, 223–253 (1995).
Palme, H. & O’Neill, H. C. in Treatise on Geochemistry (eds Holland, H. D. & Turekian, K. K.) 1–38 (Pergamon, 2007).
Gubbins, D. Energetics of the Earth’s core. J. Geophys. 43, 453–464 (1977).
Olson, P. A simple physical model for the terrestrial dynamo. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 86, 10875–10882 (1981).
Loper, D. E. & Roberts, P. Compositional convection and the gravitationally powered dynamo. Stellar Planet. Magn. 297–327 (1983).
Hirose, K., Wood, B. & Vočadlo, L. Light elements in the Earth’s core. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2, 645–658 (2021).
Bouffard, M., Choblet, G., Labrosse, S. & Wicht, J. Chemical convection and stratification in the Earth’s outer core. Front. Earth Sci. 7, 99 (2019).
Busse, F. H. Thermal instabilities in rapidly rotating systems. J. Fluid. Mech. 44, 441–460 (1970).
Cardin, P. & Olson, P. An experimental approach to thermochemical convection in the Earth’s core. Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 1995–1998 (1992).
Sumita, I. & Olson, P. Laboratory experiments on high Rayleigh number thermal convection in a rapidly rotating hemispherical shell. Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 117, 153–170 (2000).
King, E. M., Stellmach, S., Noir, J., Hansen, U. & Aurnou, J. M. Boundary layer control of rotating convection systems. Nature 457, 301–304 (2009).
Gastine, T., Wicht, J. & Aubert, J. Scaling regimes in spherical shell rotating convection. J. Fluid Mech. 808, 690–732 (2016).
Busse, F. H. A model of the geodynamo. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 42, 437–459 (1975).
Glatzmaier, G. A. & Roberts, P. H. A three-dimensional self-consistent computer simulation of a geomagnetic field reversal. Nature 377, 203–209 (1995).
Kageyama, A., Sato, T. & The Complexity Simulation Group. Computer simulation of a magnetohydrodynamic dynamo. II. Phys. Plasmas 2, 1421–1431 (1995).
Christensen, U. R. & Wicht, J. in Core Dynamics, Treatise on Geophysics 2nd edn (eds Olson, P. & Schubert, G.) 245–277 (Elsevier, 2015).
Christensen, U. & Aubert, J. Scaling properties of convection-driven dynamos in rotating spherical shells and application to planetary magnetic fields. Geophys. J. Int. 166, 97–114 (2006).
Aubert, J., Labrosse, S. & Poitou, C. Modelling the palaeo-evolution of the geodynamo. Geophys. J. Int. 179, 1414–1428 (2009).
Schwaiger, T., Gastine, T. & Aubert, J. Force balance in numerical geodynamo simulations: a systematic study. Geophys. J. Int. 219, S101–S114 (2019).
Hori, K., Teed, R. J. & Jones, C. A. The dynamics of magnetic Rossby waves in spherical dynamo simulations: a signature of strong-field dynamos? Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 276, 68–85 (2018).
Fischer, R. A. et al. High pressure metal–silicate partitioning of Ni, Co, V, Cr, Si, and O. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 167, 177–194 (2015).
Badro, J. et al. Magnesium partitioning between Earth’s mantle and core and its potential to drive an early exsolution geodynamo. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 13,240–13,248 (2018).
Hirose, K. et al. Crystallization of silicon dioxide and compositional evolution of the Earth’s core. Nature 543, 99–102 (2017).
Nakajima, M. & Stevenson, D. J. Melting and mixing states of the Earth’s mantle after the Moon-forming impact. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 427, 286–295 (2015).
Nakajima, M. et al. Scaling laws for the geometry of an impact-induced magma ocean. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 568, 116983 (2021).
Huang, D., Badro, J., Brodholt, J. & Li, Y. Ab initio molecular dynamics investigation of molten Fe–Si–O in Earth’s core. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 6397–6405 (2019).
Liu, W., Zhang, Y., Yin, Q.-Z., Zhao, Y. & Zhang, Z. Magnesium partitioning between silicate melt and liquid iron using first-principles molecular dynamics: implications for the early thermal history of the Earth’s core. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 531, 115934 (2020).
Helffrich, G., Hirose, K. & Nomura, R. Thermodynamical modeling of liquid Fe-Si-Mg-O: molten magnesium silicate release from the core. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL089218 (2020).
Arveson, S., Deng, J., Karki, B. & Lee, K. Evidence for Fe-Si-O liquid immiscibility at deep Earth pressures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 10238–10243 (2019).
Landeau, M. & Aubert, J. Equatorially asymmetric convection inducing a hemispherical magnetic field in rotating spheres and implications for the past Martian dynamo. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 185, 61–73 (2011).
Landeau, M., Aubert, J. & Olson, P. The signature of inner-core nucleation on the geodynamo. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 465, 193–204 (2017).
Driscoll, P. E. Simulating 2 Ga of geodynamo history. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 5680–5687 (2016).
Busse, F. H. Steady fluid flow in a precessing spheroidal shell. J. Fluid Mech. 33, 739–751 (1968).
Noir, J., Jault, D. & Cardin, P. Numerical study of the motions within a slowly precessing sphere at low Ekman number. J. Fluid Mech. 437, 283–299 (2001).
Le Bars, M., Cébron, D. & Le Gal, P. Flows driven by libration, precession, and tides. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 47, 163–193 (2015).
Noir, J. & Cébron, D. Precession-driven flows in non-axisymmetric ellipsoids. J. Fluid Mech. 737, 412–439 (2013).
Tilgner, A. in Core Dynamics, Treatise on Geophysics 2nd edn, Vol. 8 (eds Olson, P. & Schubert, G.) 183–212 (Elsevier, 2015).
Tilgner, A. On models of precession driven core flow. Stud. Geophys. Geodaetica 42, 232–238 (1998).
Cébron, D., Laguerre, R., Noir, J. & Schaeffer, N. Precessing spherical shells: flows, dissipation, dynamo and the lunar core. Geophys. J. Int. 219, S34–S57 (2019).
Reddy, K. S., Favier, B. & Le Bars, M. Turbulent kinematic dynamos in ellipsoids driven by mechanical forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 1741–1750 (2018).
Wu, C.-C. & Roberts, P. H. On a dynamo driven by topographic precession. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 103, 467–501 (2009).
Guermond, J.-L., Léorat, J., Luddens, F. & Nore, C. Remarks on the stability of the Navier–Stokes equations supplemented with stress boundary conditions. Eur. J. Mech. B 39, 1–10 (2013).
Spence, E., Nornberg, M., Jacobson, C., Kendrick, R. & Forest, C. Observation of a turbulence-induced large scale magnetic field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 055002 (2006).
Monchaux, R. et al. Generation of a magnetic field by dynamo action in a turbulent flow of liquid sodium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 044502 (2007).
Zimmerman, D. S., Triana, S. A., Nataf, H.-C. & Lathrop, D. P. A turbulent, high magnetic Reynolds number experimental model of Earth’s core. J. Geophys. Res. Solid. Earth 119, 4538–4557 (2014).
Cabanes, S., Schaeffer, N. & Nataf, H.-C. Turbulence reduces magnetic diffusivity in a liquid sodium experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 184501 (2014).
Stefani, F. et al. Towards a precession driven dynamo experiment. Magnetohydrodynamics 51, 275–284 (2015).
Poirier, J.-P. Introduction to the Physics of the Earth’s Interior (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).
Williams, Q. The thermal conductivity of Earth’s core: a key geophysical parameter’s constraints and uncertainties. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 46, 47–66 (2018).
Zhang, Y. et al. Reconciliation of experiments and theory on transport properties of iron and the geodynamo. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 078501 (2020).
Pourovskii, L. V., Mravlje, J., Georges, A., Simak, S. I. & Abrikosov, I. A. Electron–electron scattering and thermal conductivity of iron at Earth’s core conditions. N. J. Phys. 19, 073022 (2017).
Christensen, U. R. & Tilgner, A. Power requirement of the geodynamo from Ohmic losses in numerical and laboratory dynamos. Nature 429, 169–171 (2004).
Christensen, U. R. Dynamo scaling laws and applications to the planets. Space Sci. Rev. 152, 565–590 (2010).
Buffett, B. A., Huppert, H. E., Lister, J. R. & Woods, A. W. On the thermal evolution of the Earth’s core. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 7989–8006 (1996).
Lister, J. R. Expressions for the dissipation driven by convection in the Earth’s core. Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 140, 145–158 (2003).
Gubbins, D., Alfè, D., Masters, G., Price, G. D. & Gillan, M. J. Can the Earth’s dynamo run on heat alone? Geophys. J. Int. 155, 609–622 (2003).
Gubbins, D., Alfè, D., Masters, G., Price, G. D. & Gillan, M. Gross thermodynamics of two-component core convection. Geophys. J. Int. 157, 1407–1414 (2004).
Labrosse, S. Thermal and magnetic evolution of the Earth’s core. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 140, 127–143 (2003).
Nimmo, F. in Core Dynamics, Treatise on Geophysics 2nd edn, Vol. 8 (eds Olson, P. & Schubert, G.) 27–55 (Elsevier, 2015).
Driscoll, P. & Bercovici, D. On the thermal and magnetic histories of Earth and Venus: influences of melting, radioactivity, and conductivity. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 236, 36–51 (2014).
Patočka, V., Šrámek, O. & Tosi, N. Minimum heat flow from the core and thermal evolution of the Earth. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 305, 106457 (2020).
Hernlund, J. W., Thomas, C. & Tackley, P. J. Phase boundary double crossing and the structure of Earth’s deep mantle. Nature 434, 882–886 (2005).
Buffett, B. The thermal state of the Earth’s core. Science 299, 1675–1676 (2003).
Lay, T., Hernlund, J. & Buffett, B. A. Core–mantle boundary heat flow. Nat. Geosci. 1, 25–32 (2008).
Leng, W. & Zhong, S. Controls on plume heat flux and plume excess temperature. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 113, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005155 (2008).
Olson, P., Deguen, R., Rudolph, M. L. & Zhong, S. Core evolution driven by mantle global circulation. Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 243, 44–55 (2015).
Kennedy, G. C. & Higgins, G. H. The core paradox. J. Geophys. Res. 78, 900–904 (1973).
Busse, F. Higgins-Kennedy paradox. In Encyclopedia of Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism (eds Gubbins, D. & Herrero-Bervera, E.) 401–402 (Springer, 2007).
Davidson, P. A. Scaling laws for planetary dynamos. Geophys. J. Int. 195, 67–74 (2013).
Lay, T., Hernlund, J., Garnero, E. J. & Thorne, M. S. A post-perovskite lens and D” heat flux beneath the central Pacific. Science 314, 1272–1276 (2006).
O’Rourke, J., Korenaga, J. & Stevenson, D. Thermal evolution of Earth with magnesium precipitation in the core. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 458, 263–272 (2017).
Mittal, T. et al. Precipitation of multiple light elements to power Earth’s early dynamo. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 532, 116030 (2020).
Du, Z., Boujibar, A., Driscoll, P. & Fei, Y. Experimental constraints on an MgO exsolution-driven geodynamo. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 7379–7385 (2019).
Olson, P., Landeau, M. & Hirsh, B. Laboratory experiments on rain-driven convection: implications for planetary dynamos. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 457, 403–411 (2017).
Stevenson, D. J., Spohn, T. & Schubert, G. Magnetism and thermal evolution of the terrestrial planets. Icarus 54, 466–489 (1983).
Korenaga, J. Urey ratio and the structure and evolution of Earth’s mantle. Rev. Geophys. 46, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007RG000241 (2008).
Grove, T. & Parman, S. Thermal evolution of the Earth as recorded by komatiites. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 219, 173–187 (2004).
Herzberg, C., Condie, K. & Korenaga, J. Thermal history of the Earth and its petrological expression. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 292, 79–88 (2010).
Labrosse, S., Hernlund, J. W. & Coltice, N. A crystallizing dense magma ocean at the base of the Earth’s mantle. Nature 450, 866–869 (2007).
Ziegler, L. & Stegman, D. Implications of a long-lived basal magma ocean in generating Earth’s ancient magnetic field. Geochem. Geophys. Geosystems 14, 4735–4742 (2013).
Stixrude, L., Scipioni, R. & Desjarlais, M. P. A silicate dynamo in the early Earth. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–5 (2020).
Blanc, N. A., Stegman, D. R. & Ziegler, L. B. Thermal and magnetic evolution of a crystallizing basal magma ocean in Earth’s mantle. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 534, 116085 (2020).
Laneuville, M., Hernlund, J., Labrosse, S. & Guttenberg, N. Crystallization of a compositionally stratified basal magma ocean. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 276, 86–92 (2018).
Tyler, R. H. On the tidal history and future of the Earth–Moon orbital system. Planet. Sci. J. 2, 70 (2021).
Ray, R. D., Eanes, R. J. & Lemoine, F. G. Constraints on energy dissipation in the Earth’s body tide from satellite tracking and altimetry. Geophys. J. Int. 144, 471–480 (2001).
Kerswell, R. R. Upper bounds on the energy dissipation in turbulent precession. J. Fluid Mech. 321, 335–370 (1996).
Kerswell, R. R. The instability of precessing flow. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 72, 107–144 (1993).
Lacaze, L., Le Gal, P. & Le Dizes, S. Elliptical instability in a rotating spheroid. J. Fluid Mech. 505, 1–22 (2004).
Lin, Y., Marti, P. & Noir, J. Shear-driven parametric instability in a precessing sphere. Phys. Fluids 27, 046601 (2015).
Kerswell, R. R. Tidal excitation of hydromagnetic waves and their damping in the Earth. J. Fluid Mech. 274, 219–241 (1994).
Mineev, V. N. & Funtikov, A. I. Viscosity measurements on metal melts at high pressure and viscosity calculations for the Earth’s core. Phys. Uspekhi 47, 671 (2004).
Touma, J. & Wisdom, J. Evolution of the Earth-Moon system. Astron. J. 108, 1943–1961 (1994).
Neron de Surgy, O. & Laskar, J. On the long term evolution of the spin of the Earth. Astron. Astrophys. 318, 975–989 (1997).
Grannan, A. M., Favier, B., Le Bars, M. & Aurnou, J. M. Tidally forced turbulence in planetary interiors. Geophys. J. Int. 208, 1690–1703 (2017).
Barker, A. J. & Lithwick, Y. Non-linear evolution of the tidal elliptical instability in gaseous planets and stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 435, 3614–3626 (2013).
Monteux, J., Andrault, D. & Samuel, H. On the cooling of a deep terrestrial magma ocean. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 448, 140–149 (2016).
Deguen, R., Olson, P. & Reynolds, E. F-layer formation in the outer core with asymmetric inner core growth. C. R. Geosci. 346, 101–109 (2014).
Rubie, D. et al. Accretion and differentiation of the terrestrial planets with implications for the compositions of early-formed solar system bodies and accretion of water. Icarus 248, 89–108 (2015).
Jacobson, S. A., Rubie, D. C., Hernlund, J., Morbidelli, A. & Nakajima, M. Formation, stratification, and mixing of the cores of Earth and Venus. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 474, 375–386 (2017).
Landeau, M., Olson, P., Deguen, R. & Hirsh, B. Core merging and stratification following giant impact. Nat. Geosci. 9, 786–789 (2016).
Bouffard, M., Landeau, M. & Goument, A. Convective erosion of a primordial stratification atop Earth’s core. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL087109 (2020).
Vidal, J., Cébron, D., Schaeffer, N. & Hollerbach, R. Magnetic fields driven by tidal mixing in radiative stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 475, 4579–4594 (2018).
Christensen, U. R. Geodynamo models with a stable layer and heterogeneous heat flow at the top of the core. Geophys. J. Int. 215, 1338–1351 (2018).
Olson, P., Landeau, M. & Reynolds, E. Outer core stratification from the high latitude structure of the geomagnetic field. Front. Earth Sci. 6, 140 (2018).
Gastine, T., Aubert, J. & Fournier, A. Dynamo-based limit to the extent of a stable layer atop Earth’s core. Geophys. J. Int. 222, 1433–1448 (2020).
Bono, R. K., Tarduno, J. A., Nimmo, F. & Cottrell, R. D. Young inner core inferred from Ediacaran ultra-low geomagnetic field intensity. Nat. Geosci. 12, 143–147 (2019).
Biggin, A. J. et al. Strange fields: non-uniformitarian paleomagnetic records imply that the geodynamo process has been substantially perturbed on multiple occasions. In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts DI006–DI0014 (American Geophysical Union, 2020).
Manglik, A., Wicht, J. & Christensen, U. R. A dynamo model with double diffusive convection for Mercury’s core. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 289, 619–628 (2010).
Takahashi, F., Shimizu, H. & Tsunakawa, H. Mercury’s anomalous magnetic field caused by a symmetry-breaking self-regulating dynamo. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–8 (2019).
Monville, R., Vidal, J., Cébron, D. & Schaeffer, N. Rotating double-diffusive convection in stably stratified planetary cores. Geophys. J. Int. 219, S195–S218 (2019).
Mather, J. F. & Simitev, R. D. Regimes of thermo-compositional convection and related dynamos in rotating spherical shells. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 115, 61–84 (2021).
Tassin, T., Gastine, T. & Fournier, A. Geomagnetic semblance and dipolar-multipolar transition in top-heavy double-diffusive geodynamo models. Geophys. J. Int. 226, 1897–1919 (2021).
Davies, C. J. & Greenwood, S. Dynamics in Earth’s Core Arising from Thermo-Chemical Interactions with the Mantle. (In: Core-Mantle Coevolution - A multidisciplinary approach, Wiley), preprint at https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/181484/ (2021).
Pavón-Carrasco, F. J., Osete, M. L., Torta, J. M. & De Santis, A. A geomagnetic field model for the Holocene based on archaeomagnetic and lava flow data. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 388, 98–109 (2014).
Panovska, S., Constable, C. G. & Korte, M. Extending global continuous geomagnetic field reconstructions on timescales beyond human civilization. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 19, 4757–4772 (2018).
Usoskin, I. G., Gallet, Y., Lopes, F., Kovaltsov, G. A. & Hulot, G. Solar activity during the Holocene: the Hallstatt cycle and its consequence for grand minima and maxima. Astron. Astrophys. 587, A150 (2016).
Nilsson, A., Holme, R., Korte, M., Suttie, N. & Hill, M. Reconstructing Holocene geomagnetic field variation: new methods, models and implications. Geophys. J. Int. 198, 229–248 (2014).
Valet, J.-P., Meynadier, L. & Guyodo, Y. Geomagnetic field strength and reversal rate over the past 2 million years. Nature 435, 802–805 (2005).
Ziegler, L., Constable, C., Johnson, C. & Tauxe, L. PADM2M: a penalized maximum likelihood model of the 0–2 Ma palaeomagnetic axial dipole moment. Geophys. J. Int. 184, 1069–1089 (2011).
Cande, S. C. & Kent, D. V. Revised calibration of the geomagnetic polarity timescale for the late Cretaceous and Cenozoic. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 6093–6095 (1995).
Aubert, J., Finlay, C. C. & Fournier, A. Bottom-up control of geomagnetic secular variation by the Earth’s inner core. Nature 502, 219–223 (2013).
Le Reun, T., Favier, B. & Le Bars, M. Experimental study of the nonlinear saturation of the elliptical instability: inertial wave turbulence versus geostrophic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 879, 296–326 (2019).
Moffatt, H. K. Magnetic Field Generation In Electrically Conducting Fluids (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1978).
Roberts, P. H. & Soward, A. M. Dynamo theory. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 24, 459–512 (1992).
Chen, L. et al. The optimal kinematic dynamo driven by steady flows in a sphere. J. Fluid Mech. 839, 1–32 (2018).
Cowling, T. The magnetic field of sunspots. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 94, 39–48 (1933).
Wicht, J. & Sanchez, S. Advances in geodynamo modelling. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 113, 2–50 (2019).
The authors thank J. Badro, Y. Gallet, S. Labrosse, G. Morard, A. Nilsson and P. Olson for useful discussions. M.L. was supported by the Programme National de Planétologie (PNP) of CNRS-INSU, co-funded by CNES. N.S., A.F. and H.-C.N. acknowledge support by the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche under grant ANR-19-CE31-0019 (revEarth). D.C. acknowledges support from the European Research Council (ERC) under grant agreement no. 847433 (Theia project).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Earth & Environment thanks H. Matsui, J. Wicht and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Precipitation of a dissolved substance, due to a decrease in temperature and hence in solubility.
- Turbulent flow
A high Reynolds number flow, which, because of instabilities, exhibits a wide range of lengthscales and timescales, with apparently random fluctuations requiring a statistical description.
- Geomagnetic secular variation
Time variations of the magnetic field of the Earth with periods ranging from one year to hundreds of years.
- Alfvén waves
In a conducting liquid or plasma, oscillations of the fluid and magnetic field that propagate together along magnetic field lines. Discovered by H. Alfvén in 1942, they earned him a Nobel Prize in 1970.
- Mass anomaly flux
Thermal or chemical mass anomaly that passes through a surface area per unit of time (in kg s–1).
- Mantle thermal catastrophe
In thermal-evolution models of the Earth, solutions in which the mantle becomes fully molten within the past 2 Gyr. These solutions are incompatible with petrological observations, and hence unacceptable.
- Boundary layer
The fluid layer located in the vicinity of a bounding surface, where diffusive processes prevail.
- Flow instabilities
In hydrodynamics, a simple fluid flow can become unstable when some quantitative condition is met, leading to more complexity, enhanced mixing and sometimes chaotic behaviour or turbulence.
The angle between the normal to the ecliptic plane and the axis of rotation of the Earth. Its present-day value is 23.5°.
- Kinematic dynamo
A dynamo sustained by a prescribed velocity field, discarding any back-reaction of the magnetic field on the flow. A kinematic dynamo leads to unbounded growth of the magnetic field.
About this article
Cite this article
Landeau, M., Fournier, A., Nataf, HC. et al. Sustaining Earth’s magnetic dynamo. Nat Rev Earth Environ 3, 255–269 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00264-1