Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Arable soil nitrogen dynamics reflect organic inputs via the extended composite phenotype

Nature Food volume 4, pages 51–60 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Achieving food security requires resilient agricultural systems with improved nutrient-use efficiency, optimized water and nutrient storage in soils, and reduced gaseous emissions. Success relies on understanding coupled nitrogen and carbon metabolism in soils, their associated influences on soil structure and the processes controlling nitrogen transformations at scales relevant to microbial activity. Here we show that the influence of organic matter on arable soil nitrogen transformations can be decoded by integrating metagenomic data with soil structural parameters. Our approach provides a mechanistic explanation of why organic matter is effective in reducing nitrous oxide losses while supporting system resilience. The relationship between organic carbon, soil-connected porosity and flow rates at scales relevant to microbes suggests that important increases in nutrient-use efficiency could be achieved at lower organic carbon stocks than currently envisaged.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: SOC and soil Ntot stock dynamics in Broadbalk soils.
Fig. 2: Contrasting long-term soil management results in quantitatively different process-form states.
Fig. 3: Nitrogen metabolism-associated gene assemblages in triplicate pseudo-replicate soil metagenomes from FYM-amended, inorganically fertilized (144NPK, 192NK and PK) arable soils of the Broadbalk Winter Wheat Experiment and unmanaged (woodland and grassland) soils, determined from shotgun metagenomics.
Fig. 4: Kernel density estimation of the distribution of N2O emissions from FYM-amended (n = 25) and inorganically fertilized (240NPK, n = 30; 144NPK, n = 24; 192NK, n = 25; and PK, n = 23) soils of the Broadbalk Winter Wheat Experiment measured between April and November 2019.
Fig. 5: Long term non-equilibrium nitrogen use efficiency of FYM-amended and inorganically fertilized soils.

Data availability

Data relating to the Broadbalk and Highfield long-term experiments can be accessed via the electronic Rothamsted Archive (http://www.era.rothamsted.ac.uk/experiment/rbk1 and http://www.era.rothamsted.ac.uk/experiment/rrn1, respectively). Historical data relating to nitrogen inputs (as ammonium nitrate fertilizer or FYM, within seed grain and atmospheric deposition), off-takes (as harvested grain and straw) and soil nitrogen stocks are available at https://doi.org/10.23637/rbk1-yldS10115-01. All soil images are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author. Sequence data associated with this research have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive with the accession number PRJEB43407. X-ray computed tomography was performed at the Hounsfield Facility of the University of Nottingham where the resulting images are stored. Due to the large number and size of the files, original greyscale and converted binary images are available upon reasonable request from Sacha Mooney, University of Nottingham (sacha.mooney@nottingham.ac.uk). Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

C++code for lattice Boltzmann simulation of the dissolution and diffusion of oxygen in 3D soil structures under different soil water contents is available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21493704.

References

  1. Laborde, D. et al. Agricultural subsidies and global greenhouse gas emissions. Nat. Commun. 12, 2601 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bouwman, A. F., Boumans, L. J. M. & Batjes, N. H. Emissions of N2O and NO from fertilized fields: summary of available measurement data. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 16, 1058–1070 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Clark, M. A. et al. Global food system emissions could preclude achieving the 1.5° and 2°C climate change targets. Science 370, 705–708 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Guenet, B. et al. Can N2O emissions offset the benefits from soil organic carbon storage? Glob. Change Biol. 27, 237–256 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rappoldt, C. & Crawford, J. W. The distribution of anoxic volume in a fractal model of soil. Geoderma 88, 329–347 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Letey, J. The study of soil structure—science or art. Aust. J. Soil Res. 29, 699–707 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Neal, A. L. et al. Soil as an extended composite phenotype of the microbial metagenome. Sci. Rep. 10, 10649 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Phillips, J. D. Soils as extended composite phenotypes. Geoderma 149, 142–151 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dawkins, R. The Extended Phenotype. The Gene as the Unit of Selection (Oxford Univ. Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dawkins, R. Extended phenotype—but not too extended. A reply to Laland, Turner and Jablonka. Biol. Philos. 19, 377–396 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramirez, K. S. et al. Consistent effects of nitrogen fertilization on soil bacterial communities in contrasting systems. Ecology 91, 3463–3470 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fierer, N. et al. Comparative metagenomic, phylogenetic and physiological analyses of soil microbial communities across nitrogen gradients. ISME J. 6, 1007–1017 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Geisseler, D. & Scow, K. M. Long-term effects of mineral fertilizers on soil microorganisms: a review. Soil Biol. Biochem. 75, 54–63 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ouyang, Y. et al. Effect of nitrogen fertilization on the abundance of nitrogen cycling genes in agricultural soils: a meta-analysis of field studies. Soil Biol. Biochem. 127, 71–78 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Knapp, C. et al. Spatial heterogeneity of denitrification genes in a highly homogeneous urban stream. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 4273–4279 (2009).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Graham, D. W. et al. Correlations between in situ denitrification activity and nir-gene abundances in pristine and impacted prairie streams. Environ. Pollut. 158, 3225–3229 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tatariw, C. et al. Denitrification in a large river: consideration of geomorphic controls on microbial activity and community structure. Ecology 94, 2249–2262 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Marchant, H. et al. Denitrifying community in coastal sediments performs aerobic and anaerobic respiration simultaneously. ISME J. 11, 1799–1812 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Petersen, D. G. et al. Abundance of microbial genes associated with nitrogen cycling as indices of biogeochemical process rates across a vegetation gradient in Alaska. Environ. Microbiol. 14, 993–1008 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rocca, J. et al. Relationships between protein-encoding gene abundance and corresponding process are commonly assumed yet rarely observed. ISME J. 9, 1693–1699 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schjønning, P. et al. Modelling soil pore characteristics from measurements of air exchange: the long-term effects of fertilization and crop rotation. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 53, 331–339 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bacq-Labreuil, A. et al. Effects of cropping systems upon the three-dimensional architecture of soil systems are highly contingent upon texture. Geoderma 332, 73–83 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Arah, J. R. M. & Ball, B. C. A functional model of soil porosity used to interpret measurements of gas diffusion. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 45, 135–144 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ball, B. C. Soil structure and greenhouse gas emissions: a synthesis of 20 years of experimentation. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 64, 357–373 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, X. et al. Relationship between soil carbon sequestration and the ability of soil aggregates to transport dissolved oxygen. Geoderma 403, 115370 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, X. et al. The effects of long-term fertilizations on soil hydraulic properties vary with scales. J. Hydrol. 593, 125890 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Raun, W. R. & Johnson, G. V. Improving nitrogen use efficiency for cereal production. Agron. J. 91, 357–363 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Erisman, J. W. et al. An integrated approach to a nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) indicator for the food production–consumption chain. Sustainability 10, 925 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cárdenas, L. M. et al. Nitrogen use efficiency and nitrous oxide emissions from five UK fertilised grasslands. Sci. Total Environ. 661, 696–710 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Jenkinson, D. S. The Nitrogen Economy of the Broadbalk Experiments. I. Nitrogen Balance in the Experiments. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1976, Part 2. 103–109 (1977). Rothamsted Research: Harpenden.

  31. Powlson, D. S. et al. The nitrogen cycle in the Broadbalk Wheat Experiment: recovery and losses of 15N-labelled fertilizer applied in spring and inputs of nitrogen from the atmosphere. J. Agric. Sci. 107, 591–609 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Addiscott, T. & Powlson, D. Partitioning losses of nitrogen fertilizer between leaching and denitrification. J. Agric. Sci. 118, 101–107 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Skinner, C. et al. Greenhouse gas fluxes from agricultural soils under organic and non-organic management—a global meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 468–469, 553–563 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Körschens, M. et al. Effect of mineral and organic fertilization on crop yield, nitrogen uptake, carbon and nitrogen balances, as well as soil organic carbon content and dynamics: results from 20 European long-term field experiments of the twenty-first century. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 59, 1017–1040 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Oelofse, M. et al. Do soil organic carbon levels affect potential yields and nitrogen use efficiency? An analysis of winter wheat and spring barley field trials. Eur. J. Agron. 66, 62–73 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hijbeek, R. et al. Do organic inputs matter—a meta-analysis of additional yield effects for arable crops in Europe. Plant Soil 411, 293–303 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Huang, J., Hartemink, A. E. & Kucharik, C. J. Soil-dependent response of US crop yields to climate variability and depth to groundwater. Agric. Syst. 190, 103085 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kane, D. A. et al. Soil organic matter protects US maize yields and lowers insurance payouts under drought. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 044018 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Macholdt, J. et al. The effects of cropping sequence, fertilization and straw management on the yield stability of winter wheat (1986–2017) in the Broadbalk Wheat Experiment, Rothamsted, UK. J. Agric. Sci. 158, 65–79 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Guenet, B. et al. Can N2O emissions offset the benefits from soil organic carbon storage? Glob. Change Biol. 27, 237–256 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Macdonald, A. et al. Guide to the Classical and Other Long-Term Experiments, Datasets and Sample Archive (Rothamsted Research, 2018).

  42. Vogel, H.-J., Weller, U. & Schlüter, S. Quantification of soil structure based upon Minkowski functions. Comput. Geosci. 36, 1236–1245 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang, X. et al. A multi-scale lattice Boltzmann model for simulating solute transport in 3D X-ray micro-tomography images of aggregated porous materials. J. Hydrol. 541, 1020–1029 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Li, Z. et al. Direct methods to calculate the mass exchange between solutes inside and outside aggregates in macroscopic model for solute transport in aggregated soil. Geoderma 320, 126–135 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Harrison, D. E. F. & Pirt, S. J. The influence of dissolved oxygen concentration on the respiration and glucose metabolism of Klebsiella aerogenes during growth. J. Gen. Microbiol. 46, 193–211 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Buchfink, B., Xie, C. & Huson, D. H. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 12, 59–60 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Huson, D. H. et al. MEGAN Community Edition—interactive exploration and analysis of large-scale microbiome sequencing data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1004957 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kanehisa, M. et al. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D457–D462 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Bateman, E. J. & Baggs, E. M. Contributions of nitrification and denitrification to N2O emissions from soils at different water-filled pore space. Biol. Fertil. Soils 41, 379–388 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Liang, D. & Robertson, G. P. Nitrification is a minor source of nitrous oxide (N2O) in an agricultural landscape and declines with increasing management intensity. Glob. Change Biol. 7, 5599–5613 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Chadwick, D. R. et al. Optimizing chamber methods for measuring nitrous oxide emissions from plot‐based agricultural experiments. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 65, 295–307 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Cowan, N. J. et al. Investigating uptake of N2O in agricultural soils using a high-precision dynamic chamber method. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 7, 4455–4462 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by UK Research and Innovation’s (UKRI) Biotechnology and Biological Science Research Council (BBSRC)-funded Soil to Nutrition strategic programme (BBS/E/C/000I0310 for A.L.N., X.Z., D.H., I.M.C. and J.W.C., and BBS/E/C/000I0320 for T.T. and L.M.C.). The Broadbalk Wheat Experiment is part of the Rothamsted Long-term Experiments National Capability supported by BBSRC (BBS/E/C/000J0300 for M.L.G.) and the Lawes Agricultural Trust. H.A.B. was supported by funding from the Soils Training and Research Studentships programme provided by UKRI’s BBSRC and Natural Environment Research Council. L.-J.G. and R.K. were supported by the Hartree National Centre for Digital Innovation, a collaboration between UKRI’s Science and Technology Facilities Council and IBM Research Europe.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Harry A. Barrat

    Present address: The Carbon Trust, London, UK

  2. Aurélie Bacq-Lebreuil

    Present address: Genesis, Lisors, France

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Net Zero and Resilient Farming, Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, UK

    Andrew L. Neal, Harry A. Barrat, Taro Takahashi & Laura M. Cárdenas

  2. School of Biosciences, The University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, UK

    Aurélie Bacq-Lebreuil, Karl Ritz & Sacha J. Mooney

  3. Department of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Yuwei Qin

  4. Sustainable Soils and Crops, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK

    Xiaoxian Zhang & Ian M. Clark

  5. Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, UK

    Taro Takahashi

  6. Programa de Producción y Sustentabilidad Ambiental, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental INIA La Estanzuela, Colonia, Uruguay

    Valentina Rubio

  7. School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA

    Valentina Rubio

  8. Intelligent Data Ecosystems, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK

    David Hughes & Margaret L. Glendining

  9. IBM Research Europe - Daresbury, The Hartree Centre, Warrington, UK

    Laura-Jayne Gardiner & Ritesh Krishna

  10. Adam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

    John W. Crawford

Authors
  1. Andrew L. Neal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Harry A. Barrat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aurélie Bacq-Lebreuil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuwei Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaoxian Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Taro Takahashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Valentina Rubio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. David Hughes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ian M. Clark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Laura M. Cárdenas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Laura-Jayne Gardiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Ritesh Krishna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Margaret L. Glendining
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Karl Ritz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Sacha J. Mooney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. John W. Crawford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.L.N., conceptualization, methodology, software, formal analysis, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, visualization, funding acquisition; H.A.B., formal analysis, investigation; A.B.-L., formal analysis, investigation; Y.Q., investigation; X.Z., conceptualization, investigation, software, writing—review and editing; T.T., conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation; V.R., formal analysis, investigation; D.H., software, data curation; I.M.C., software, investigation, data curation; L.M.C., resources, writing—review and editing, supervision; L.-J.G., software, formal analysis, data curation; R.K., software, formal analysis, data curation; M.L.G., data curation, writing—review and editing; K.R., conceptualization, writing—review and editing, supervision; S.J.M., conceptualization, writing—review and editing, resources, supervision; J.W.C., conceptualization, writing—review and editing, funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew L. Neal.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Food thanks Shuli Niu and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Methods and Results, and Figs. 1–3.

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data for soil organic carbon and total nitrogen stocks between 1881 and 2015 for soils of the Broadbalk Winter Wheat Experiment and unmanaged grassland. This is also the source data for Supplementary Fig. 1.

Source Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data for: (A) soil organic carbon and total nitrogen stocks between 1843 and 2015 for soils of the Broadbalk Winter Wheat Experiment and unmanaged grassland; (B) observed connected porosity, simulated hydraulic conductivity and soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks of soils of the Broadbalk Winter Wheat Experiment and unmanaged grassland; (C) simulated proportion of anoxic pore space at different soil matric potentials based on lattice Boltzmann simulation of the pore network behaviour observed in soils of the Broadbalk Winter Wheat Experiment and unmanaged grassland.

Source Data Fig. 4

Raw statistical source data for soil nitrous oxide emissions from soils of the Broadbalk Winter Wheat Experiment collected using in situ static chambers between 11 April and 7 October 2019. This is also the source data for Supplementary Fig. 2.

Source Data Fig. 5

Statistical source data for nitrogen inputs to soil and off-takes in wheat grain and straw and total annual rainfall for soils of the Broadbalk Winter Wheat Experiment from 1966 to 2015. This is also the source data for Supplementary Fig 3.

Source Data Table 2

Statistical source data for measured soil total porosity and connected porosity derived from X-ray computed tomography, and simulated permeability, relative diffusion coefficient and hydraulic conductivity for soils of the Broadbalk Winter Wheat Experiment and unmanaged grassland.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neal, A.L., Barrat, H.A., Bacq-Lebreuil, A. et al. Arable soil nitrogen dynamics reflect organic inputs via the extended composite phenotype. Nat Food 4, 51–60 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00671-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00671-z

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing