Agriculture and land use are major sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions but previous estimates were either highly aggregate or provided spatial details for subsectors obtained via different methodologies. Using a model–data integration approach that ensures full consistency between subsectors, we provide spatially explicit estimates of production- and consumption-based GHG emissions worldwide from plant- and animal-based human food in circa 2010. Global GHG emissions from the production of food were found to be 17,318 ± 1,675 TgCO2eq yr−1, of which 57% corresponds to the production of animal-based food (including livestock feed), 29% to plant-based foods and 14% to other utilizations. Farmland management and land-use change represented major shares of total emissions (38% and 29%, respectively), whereas rice and beef were the largest contributing plant- and animal-based commodities (12% and 25%, respectively), and South and Southeast Asia and South America were the largest emitters of production-based GHGs.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $9.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The results for CO2, CH4 and N2O from the plant- and animal-based food are available at the ISAM website http://climate.atmos.uiuc.edu/Food_Emissions. The results for individual plant- and animal-based commodities are available upon request.
All codes are available upon request.
How to Feed the World in 2050 (FAO, 2019); http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/wsfs/docs/expert_paper/How_to_Feed_the_World_in_2050.pdf
Herrero, M. et al. Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 20888–20893 (2013).
IPCC Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (Cambridge University Press, 2014).
Tubiello, F. in Encyclopedia of Food Security and Sustainability vol. 1 (eds Ferranti, P., Berry, E. M. & Anderson, J. R.) 196–205 (Elsevier, 2019).
Poore, J. & Nemecek, T. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science 360, 987–992 (2018).
Mbow, C. et al. in Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.) Ch. 5, 437–550 (IPCC, 2019).
Rosenzweig, C. et al. Climate change responses benefit from a global food system approach. Nat. Food 1, 94–97 (2020).
Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global carbon budget 2019. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 11, 1783–1838 (2019).
Tubiello, F. N. et al. Carbon emissions and removals by forests: new estimates 1990–2020. Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss. 2020, 1–21 (2020).
Syakila, A. & Kroeze, C. The global nitrous oxide budget revisited. Greenhouse Gas Measure. Manage. 1, 17–26 (2011).
Saunois, M. et al. The global methane budget 2000–2017. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 1561–1623 (2020).
IPCC 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, 2006).
Carlson, K. M. et al. Greenhouse gas emissions intensity of global croplands. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 63–68 (2017).
Gerber, P. J. et al. Tackling Climate Change through Livestock: A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities (FAO, 2013).
Searchinger, T. D., Wirsenius, S., Beringer, T. & Dumas, P. Assessing the efficiency of changes in land use for mitigating climate change. Nature 564, 249–253 (2018).
Jain, A. K. & Yang, X. Modeling the effects of two different land cover change data sets on the carbon stocks of plants and soils in concert with CO2 and climate change. Global Biogeochem Cycles 19, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gb002349 (2005).
Emissions—Agriculture, FAOSTAT Online Database (2019); http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Bond-Lamberty, B. et al. JGCRI/gcamdata: GCAM Data System Version 1.0 (2019); https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1249932
Jain, A. K., Meiyappan, P., Song, Y. & House, J. I. CO2 emissions from land-use change affected more by nitrogen cycle, than by the choice of land-cover data. Glob. Chang. Biol. 19, 2893–2906 (2013).
Meiyappan, P. & Jain, A. K. Three distinct global estimates of historical land-cover change and land-use conversions for over 200 years. Front. Earth Sci. 6, 122–139 (2012).
Hurtt, G. C. et al. Harmonization of global land-use change and management for the period 850-2100 (LUH2) for CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss. 2020, 1–65 (2020).
Production, FAOSTAT Online Database (FAO, 2019); http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Zalles, V. et al. Near doubling of Brazil’s intensive row crop area since 2000. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 428–435 (2019).
Food Balance, FAOSTAT Online Database (FAO, 2019); http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Trade, FAOSTAT Online Database (FAO, 2019); http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Pendrill, F. et al. Agricultural and forestry trade drives large share of tropical deforestation emissions. Glob. Environ. Change 56, 1–10 (2019).
Emissions—Land Use, FAOSTAT Online Database (FAO, 2019); http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Monfreda, C., Ramankutty, N. & Foley, J. A. Farming the planet: 2. Geographic distribution of crop areas, yields, physiological types, and net primary production in the year 2000. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 22, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gb002947 (2008).
Janssens-Maenhout, G. et al. EDGAR v4.3.2 Global Atlas of the three major greenhouse gas emissions for the period 1970–2012. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 11, 959–1002 (2019).
Kyle, G. P. et al. GCAM 3.0 Agriculture and Land Use: Data Sources and Methods (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2011).
Wolf, J. et al. Biogenic carbon fluxes from global agricultural production and consumption. Global Biogeochem Cycles 29, 1617–1639 (2015).
Heuzé, V., Tran, G., Bastianelli, D., Archimede, H. & Sauvant, D. Feedipedia: An Open Access International Encyclopedia on Feed Resources for Farm Animals (2013); https://www.feedipedia.org/
Krausmann, F., Erb, K. H., Gingrich, S., Lauk, C. & Haberl, H. Global patterns of socioeconomic biomass flows in the year 2000: a comprehensive assessment of supply, consumption and constraints. Ecol. Econ. 65, 471–487 (2008).
Meiyappan, P., Jain, A. K. & House, J. I. Increased influence of nitrogen limitation on CO2 emissions from future land use and land use change. Global Biogeochem Cycles 29, 1524–1548 (2015).
Shu, S., Jain, A. K. & Kheshgi, H. S. Investigating wetland and nonwetland soil methane emissions and sinks across the contiguous United States using a land surface model. Global Biogeochem Cycles 34, e2019GB006251 (2020).
Yang, X. J., Wittig, V., Jain, A. K. & Post, W. Integration of nitrogen cycle dynamics into the Integrated Science Assessment Model for the study of terrestrial ecosystem responses to global change. Global Biogeochem Cycles 23, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009gb003474 (2009).
Yevich, R. & Logan, J. A. An assessment of biofuel use and burning of agricultural waste in the developing world. Global Biogeochem Cycles 17, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002gb001952 (2003).
Wang, R. et al. High-resolution mapping of combustion processes and implications for CO2 emissions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 5189–5203 (2013).
Global Livestock Environmental Assessment Model Version 2.0 Description (FAO, 2018); http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/gleam/docs/GLEAM_2.0_Model_description.pdf
Food Balance Sheets: A Handbook (FAO, 2001).
Cassidy, E. S., West, P. C., Gerber, J. S. & Foley, J. A. Redefining agricultural yields: from tonnes to people nourished per hectare. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034015 (2013).
Borken-Kleefeld, J. & Weidema, B. Global default data for freight transport per product group https://www.ecoinvent.org/files/transport_default_20130722.xlsx (2013).
Kinnon, A. Guidelines for Measuring and Managing CO2 Emission from Freight Transport Operations (European Chemical Industry Council, 2011).
Mueller, N. D. et al. Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature 490, 254–257 (2012).
West, P. C. et al. Leverage points for improving global food security and the environment. Science 345, 325–328 (2014).
Inputs, FAOSTAT Online Database (FAO, 2019); http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Xu, R. T. et al. Increased nitrogen enrichment and shifted patterns in the world’s grassland: 1860–2016. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 11, 175–187 (2019).
Zhang, B. et al. Global manure nitrogen production and application in cropland during 1860–2014: a 5arcmin gridded global dataset for Earth system modeling. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 9, 667–678 (2017).
Agri-Environmental Indicators, FAOSTAT Online Database (FAO, 2019); http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
This research is partly supported by the US Department of Energy (number DE-SC0016323). The map figures in the main text and the Supplementary Information were created using Matplotlib Basemap Toolkit of Python.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Food thanks Sarah Bridle, Timothy Robinson and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, X., Sharma, P., Shu, S. et al. Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods. Nat Food 2, 724–732 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00358-x