Current AI policy recommendations differ on what the risks to human autonomy are. To systematically address risks to autonomy, we need to confront the complexity of the concept itself and adapt governance solutions accordingly.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 per month
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$99.00 per year
only $8.25 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Raz, J. The Morality of Freedom (Clarendon Press, 1986).
Korsgaard, C. M., Cohen, G. A., Geuss, R., Nagel, T. Williams, T. & O’Neilk, O. The Sources of Normativity (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996).
Christman, J. in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (ed. Zalta, E. N.) (Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford Univ., 2020); https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/autonomy-moral/
Roessler, B. Autonomy: An Essay on the Life Well-Lived (John Wiley, 2021).
Susser, D., Roessler, B. & Nissenbaum, H. Technology, Autonomy, and Manipulation (Technical Report) (Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY, 2019).
Kramer, A. D. I., Guillory, J. E. & Hancock, J. T. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 8788–8790 (2014).
European Commission High-Level Experts Group (HLEG). Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI (Technical Report B-1049) (EC, Brussels, 2019).
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct (ACM, 2018).
Université de Montréal. Montreal Declaration for a Responsible Development of AI (Forum on the Socially Responsible Development of AI (Université de Montréal, 2017).
European Committee of the Regions. White Paper on Artificial Intelligence - A European approach to excellence and trust (EC, 2020).
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence (Technical Report OECD/LEGAL/0449) (OECD 2019); https://oecd.ai/en/ai-principles
European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies. Statement on artificial intelligence, robotics and ‘autonomous’ systems (EC, 2018).
Floridi, L. & Cowls, J. Harvard Data Sci. Rev 1, 1–13 (2019).
Fjeld, J., Achten, N., Hilligoss, H., Nagy, A. & Srikumar, M. Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-Based Approaches to Principles for AI (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3518482) (Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY, 2020); https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3518482
Milano, S., Taddeo, M. & Floridi, L. Recommender Systems and their Ethical Challenges (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3378581) (Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY, 2019).
Calvo, R. A., Peters, D. & D’Mello, S. Commun. ACM 58, 41–42 (2015).
Mik, E. Law Innov. Technol. 8, 1–38 (2016).
Helberger, N. Profiling and Targeting Consumers in the Internet of Things – A New Challenge for Consumer Law (Technical Report) (Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY, 2016).
Burr, C., Morley, J., Taddeo, M. & Floridi, L. IEEE Trans. Technol. Soc. 1, 21–33 (2020).
Morley, J. & Floridi, L. Sci. Eng. Ethics 26, 1159–1183 (2020).
Brownsword, R. in Law, Human Agency and Autonomic Computing (eds Hildebrandt., M. & Rouvroy, A.) 80–100 (Routledge, 2011).
Calvo, R., Peters, D., Vold, K. V. & Ryan, R. in Ethics of Digital Well-Being (Philosophical Studies Series, vol. 140) (eds Burr, C. & Floridi, L.) 31–54 (Springer, 2020).
Rubel, A., Castro, C. & Pham, A. Algorithms and Autonomy: The Ethics of Automated Decision Systems (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).
Dworkin, G. The Theory and Practice of Autonomy (Cambridge Univ. Press. 1988).
Mackenzie, C. Three Dimensions of Autonomy: A Relational Analysis (Oxford Univ. Press, 2014).
Noggle, R. Am. Philos. Q. 33, 43–55 (1996).
Elster, J. Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1985).
Adomavicius, G., Bockstedt, J. C., Curley, S. P. & Zhang, J. Info. Syst. Res 24, 956–975 (2013).
Ledford, H. Nature 574, 608–609 (2019).
Dworkin, G. in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (ed. Zalta, E. N.) (Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford Univ. Press, 2020; https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/paternalism/
Kühler, M. Bioethics 36, 194–200 (2021).
Christman, J. The Politics of Persons: Individual Autonomy and Socio-Historical Selves (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009.)
The author thanks J. Tasioulas, M. Philipps-Brown, C. Veliz, T. Lechterman, A. Dafoe and B. Garfinkel for their helpful comments. Funding: No external funding sources.
The author declares no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature Machine Intelligence thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prunkl, C. Human autonomy in the age of artificial intelligence. Nat Mach Intell 4, 99–101 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00449-9
This article is cited by
Decolonizing AI Ethics: Relational Autonomy as a Means to Counter AI Harms
Evaluating an artificial intelligence literacy programme for empowering and developing concepts, literacy and ethical awareness in senior secondary students
Education and Information Technologies (2022)