Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

An embedded ethics approach for AI development

There is a need to consider how AI developers can be practically assisted in identifying and addressing ethical issues. In this Comment, a group of AI engineers, ethicists and social scientists suggest embedding ethicists into the development team as one way of improving the consideration of ethical issues during AI development.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Jobin, A., Ienca, M. & Vayena, E. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 389–399 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    European Commission High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI (European Commission, 2018).

  3. 3.

    Floridi, L. et al. Minds Mach. 28, 689–707 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hagendorff, T. Minds Mach. 30, 99–120 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Mittelstadt, B. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 501–507 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Metcalf, J., Moss, E. & Boyd, D. Soc. Res. 82, 449–476 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Theodorou, A. & Dignum, V. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2, 10–12 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Obermeyer, Z. & Emanuel, E. J. N. Engl. J. Med. 29, 1216–1219 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Grosz, B. et al. Commun. ACM 62, 54–61 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bonnemains, V., Saurel, C. & Tessier Ethics Inform. Technol. 20, 41–58 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ives, J. et al. BMC Med. Ethics 19, 68 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Coeckelbergh, M. Technol. Reg. 1, 31–34 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bostrom, N. & Yudkowsky, E. in The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence (eds Frankish, K. & Ramsey, W. M.) 316–334 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  14. 14.

    Whittlestone, J., Nyrup, R., Alexandrova, A., Dihal, K. & Cave, S. Ethical and Societal Implications of Algorithms, Data, and Artificial Intelligence: A Roadmap for Research 59 (Nuffield Foundation, 2019).

  15. 15.

    Rigby, M. J. AMA J. Ethics 21, E121–124 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Begley, S. Stat News https://www.statnews.com/2017/02/23/bioethics-harvard-george-church/ (2017).

  17. 17.

    Bietti, E. in Proc. 2020 Conf. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (eds Hildebrandt, M. & Castillo, C.) 210–219 (ACM, 2020).

  18. 18.

    Wagner, B. in Being Profiled: Cogitas Ergo Sum: 10 Years of ‘Profiling the European Citizen’ (eds Bayamlioglu, E. et al.) 84–89 (Amsterdam Univ. Press, 2018).

  19. 19.

    Brundage, M. & Bryson, J. J. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.08196 (2016).

  20. 20.

    Winfield, A. F. T. & Jirotka, M. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20180085 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Strech, D. & Sofaer, N. J. Med. Ethics 38, 121–126 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The support by the Bavarian Institute for Digital Transformation is gratefully acknowledged. L.A.C. is funded by the National Institute of Health through NIBIB R01 EB017205.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.M. and A.B. conceived the initial idea of the paper. S.M. prepared the initial draft with the assistance of A.F., in regular discussion with A.B., who provided feedback and comments. L.A.C., R.M., J.H., K.R. and S.H. reviewed the draft and critically revised it for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final version of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart McLennan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A.B. is a member of the German Ethics Council. S.H. is a member of the European High-Level Group on Artificial Intelligence, and is a founder of robotics company Franka Emika.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McLennan, S., Fiske, A., Celi, L.A. et al. An embedded ethics approach for AI development. Nat Mach Intell 2, 488–490 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-0214-1

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing