Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Bioinspired acousto-magnetic microswarm robots with upstream motility


The ability to propel against flows, that is, to perform positive rheotaxis, can provide exciting opportunities for applications in targeted therapeutics and non-invasive surgery. So far no biocompatible technologies exist for navigating microparticles upstream when they are in a background fluid flow. Inspired by many naturally occurring microswimmers—such as bacteria, spermatozoa and plankton—that utilize the no-slip boundary conditions of the wall to exhibit upstream propulsion, here we report on the design and characterization of self-assembled microswarms that can execute upstream motility in a combination of external acoustic and magnetic fields. Both acoustic and magnetic fields are safe to humans, non-invasive, can penetrate deeply into the human body and are well-developed in clinical settings. The combination of both fields can overcome the limitations encountered by single actuation methods. The design criteria of the acoustically induced reaction force of the microswarms, which is needed to perform rolling-type motion, are discussed. We show quantitative agreement between experimental data and our model that captures the rolling behaviour. The upstream capability provides a design strategy for delivering small drug molecules to hard-to-reach sites and represents a fundamental step towards the realization of micro- and nanosystem navigation against the blood flow.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Bioinspired upstream motion in an acoustic and magnetic field.
Fig. 2: Estimation of the acoustic-induced reaction force.
Fig. 3: Microswarm formation.
Fig. 4: Upstream rolling model of the microswarm.
Fig. 5: Microswarm rheotaxis in combined acoustic and magnetic fields.

Data availability

The authors declare that data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information. Source data are provided with this paper.


  1. 1.

    Ashkin, A., Dziedzic, J. M., Bjorkholm, J. E. & Chu, S. Observation of a single-beam gradient force optical trap for dielectric particles. Opt. Lett. 11, 288–290 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ma, F., Wang, S., Wu, D. T. & Wu, N. Electric-field induced assembly and propulsion of chiral colloidal clusters. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6307–6312 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Snezhko, A. & Aranson, I. S. Magnetic manipulation of self-assembled colloidal asters. Nat. Mater. 10, 698–703 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Lipfert, J., JKerssemakers, J. W. J. & Jager, T. Magnetic torque tweezers: measuring torsional stiffness in DNA and RecA-DNA filaments. Nat. Methods 7, 977–980 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sukhov, A. & Berakdar, J. Local control of ultrafast dynamics of magnetic nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 057204 (2009).

  6. 6.

    Miyashita, S., Guitron, S., Li, S. & Rus, D. Robotic metamorphosis by origami exoskeletons. Sci. Robot. 2, eaao4369 (2017).

  7. 7.

    Grifantini, R. et al. Magnetically driven drug delivery systems improving targeted immunotherapy for colon-rectal cancer. J. Control. Release 280, 76–86 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Yang, M. & Ripoll, M. Soft matter hydrodynamic simulations of self-phoretic microswimmers. Soft Matter. 10, 6208–6218 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Shi, J. et al. Acoustic tweezers: patterning cells and microparticles using standing surface acoustic waves (SSAW). Lab Chip 9, 2890–2895 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ahmed, D. et al. Rotational manipulation of single cells and organisms using acoustic waves. Nat. Commun. 7, 11085 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ding, X. et al. On-chip manipulation of single microparticles, cells, and organisms using surface acoustic waves. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 11105–11109 (2012).

  12. 12.

    Friend, J. & Yeo, L. Y. Microscale acoustofluidics: microfluidics driven via acoustics and ultrasonics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 647–704 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Purcell, E. M. Life at low Reynolds number. Am. J. Phys. 45, 3–11 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Williams, B. J., Anand, S. V., Rajagopalan, J. & Saif, M. T. A. A self-propelled biohybrid swimmer at low Reynolds number. Nat. Commun. 5, 3081 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Medina-Sánchez, M. & Schmidt, O. G. Medical microbots need better imaging and control. Nature 545, 406–408 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lauga, E., Diluzio, W. R., Whitesides, G. M. & Stone, H. A. Swimming in circles: motion of bacteria near solid boundaries. Biophys. J. 90, 400–412 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kaya, T. & Koser, H. Direct upstream motility in Escherichia coli bacteria preparation. Biophys. J. 102, 1514–1523 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Mattick, J. S. Type IV pili and twitching motility. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 56, 289–314 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kantsler V., Dunkel J., Blayney M. & Goldstein R. E. Rheotaxis facilitates upstream navigation of mammalian sperm cells. eLife 3, e02403 (2014).

  20. 20.

    Miki, K. & Clapham, D. E. Article rheotaxis guides mammalian sperm. Curr. Biol. 23, 443–452 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Elgeti, J., Winkler, R. G. & Gompper, G. Physics of microswimmers—single particle motion and collective behavior. Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 056601 (2014).

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Durham, W. M. & Stocker, R. Thin phytoplankton layers: characteristics, mechanisms, and consequences. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 4, 177–207 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Miki, K. & Clapham, D. E. Rheotaxis guides mammalian sperm. Curr. Biol. 23, 443–452 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kaupp, U. B. & Strünker, T. Signaling in sperm: more dfferent than similar. Trends Cell Biol. 27, 101–109 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Simmchen, J. et al. Topographical pathways guide chemical microswimmers. Nat. Commun. 7, 10598 (2016).

  26. 26.

    Das, S. et al. Boundaries can steer active Janus spheres. Nat. Commun. 6, 8999 (2015).

  27. 27.

    Liu, C., Zhou, C., Wang, W. & Zhang, H. P. Bimetallic microswimmers speed up in confining channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 198001 (2016).

  28. 28.

    Katuri, J., Uspal, W. E., Simmchen, J., Miguel-lópez, A. & Sánchez, S. Cross-stream migration of active particles. Sci. Adv. 4, eaao1755 (2018).

  29. 29.

    Palacci, al. Artificial rheotaxis. Sci. Adv. 1, –e1400214 (2015).

  30. 30.

    Palacci, J., Sacanna, S., Steinberg, A. P., Pine, D. J. & Chaikin, P. M. Living crystals of light-activated colloidal surfers. Science 339, 936–941 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ren, L. et al. Rheotaxis of bimetallic micromotors driven by driven by chemical–acoustic hybrid power. ACS Nano. 11, 10591–10598 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    De Ávila, B. E. et al. Micromotor-enabled active drug delivery for in vivo treatment of stomach infection Berta. Nat. Commun. 8, 272 (2017).

  33. 33.

    Tierno, P., Golestanian, R., Pagonabarraga, I. & Sague, F. Controlled swimming in confined fluids of magnetically actuated colloidal rotors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 218304 (2008).

  34. 34.

    Martinez-pedrero, F., Ortiz-ambriz, A., Pagonabarraga, I. & Tierno, P. Colloidal microworms propelling via a cooperative hydrodynamic conveyor belt. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 138301 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ahmed, D. et al. Neutrophil-inspired propulsion in a combined acoustic and magnetic field. Nat. Commun. 8, 770 (2017).

  36. 36.

    Shi, J., Ahmed, D., Mao, X., Lin, S. S. & Huang, T. J. Acoustic tweezers: patterning cells and microparticles using standing surface acoustic waves (SSAW). Lab Chip 9, 2890–2895 (2009).

  37. 37.

    Bruus, H. Acoustofluidics 7: the acoustic radiation force on small particles. Lab Chip 12, 1014–1021 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Bruus, H. Acoustofluidics 10: scaling laws in acoustophoresis. Lab Chip 12, 1578–1586 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Rune Barnkob, H. B., Iranmanesh, I., Wiklund, M. & Bruus, H. Measuring acoustic energy density in microchannel acoustophoresis using a simple and rapid light-intensity method. Lab Chip 12, 2337–2344 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Wei, W., Thiessen, D. B. & Marston, P. L. Acoustic radiation force on a compressible cylinder in a standing wave. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 201–208 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Garbin, A., Leibacher, I., Hahn, P. & Le Ferrand, H. Acoustophoresis of disk-shaped microparticles: a numerical and experimental study of acoustic radiation forces and torques. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 138, 2759 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Klingenberg, D. J., Ulicny, J. C. & Golden, M. A. Mason numbers for magnetorheology. J. Rheol. 51, 883 (2017).

  44. 44.

    Sherman, S. G., Becnel, A. C. & Wereley, N. M. Relating Mason number to Bingham number in magnetorheological fluids. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 380, 98–104 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Krishnamurthy, H. et al. Dynamics of rotating paramagnetic particle chains simulated by particle dynamics, Stokesian dynamics and lattice Boltzmann methods. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 5, 33–41 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Sherwood, J. D. Stokes drag on a disc with a Navier slip condition near a plane wall. Fluid Dyn. Res. 45, 055505 (2013).

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Goldmans, A. J., Cox, R. G. & Brenner, H. Slow viscous motion of a sphere parallel to a plane wall—I motion through a quiescent fluid. Chem. Eng. Sci. 22, 637–651 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Krishnan, G. P. & Leighton, D. T. Inertial lift on a moving sphere in contact with a plane wall in a shear flow. Phys. Fluids. 7, 2538 (1995).

  49. 49.

    Wu, Y. H. Stokes drag on a disc with a Navier slip condition near a plane wall Stokes drag on a disc with a Navier slip condition near a plane wall. Fluid Dyn. Res. (2013).

  50. 50.

    Filho, M. M. C. & Machado, J. C. The ultrasonic attenuation coefficient for human blood plasma in the frequency range of 7–90 MHz. Proc. IEEE Ultrason. Symp. 3, 2073–2077 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Coey, J. M. D. Magnetism and Magnetic Materials (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).

  52. 52.

    Medina-Sánchez, M. & Schmidt, O. G. Medical microbots need better imaging and control. Nature 545, 406–408 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Wu, Z. et al. A microrobotic system guided by photoacoustic computed tomography for targeted navigation in intestines in vivo. Sci. Robotics 4, eaax0613 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Awatani, J. Studies on acoustic radiation pressure. I. (General considerations). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 27, 278–281 (1955).

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme grant agreement no. 853309 (SONOBOTS) and grant agreement no. 743217 (SOMBOT). In addition, the work has been supported by ETH Zurich Career Seed Grant (grant no. 14 17-2) and DFG Priority Programme SPP 1726, Microswimmers—“From single particle motion to collective behaviour.”

Author information




D.A. initiated, designed, and supervised the project. D.A contributed to the experimental design and scientific presentation. D.H., M.G., A.S. and D.A. performed all of the experiments and data analysis. A.S., D.R., D.A. and J.H. developed the theoretical studies. D.A. wrote the manuscript with contribution from all authors. All authors contributed to the scientific discussion.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Daniel Ahmed or Bradley J. Nelson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1

Fabrication of the acoustofluidic device.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Ultrasound manipulation system.

(a) Schematic demonstrates the ultrasound particle manipulation setup. (b) A micrograph shows trapped microparticles in pressure nodes arrays when exposed to an ultrasound at ~2.1 MHz and 12 V, respectively.

Extended Data Fig. 3

Experimental setup of microparticle manipulation in acoustic and magnetic field.

Extended Data Fig. 4

An electromagnetic setup purchased from MagnebotiX AG (Zurich, Switzerland) with eight independently controlled coils was integrated with the inverted microscope to generate a rotating magnetic field.

Extended Data Fig. 5

Swarm stability against thermal fluctuation A plot demonstrates the ratio of the thermal to magnetic forces versus the radius of superparamagnetic particles. Magnetic forces dominate over the thermal effects for particles with radii 3 μm.

Extended Data Fig. 6

Poiseuille flow profile Experimental characterization of the Poiseuille flow profile within the circular channel.

Extended Data Fig. 7

Upstream motion Upstream migration of swarm of microparticles in a combined acoustic and magnetic field where the pressure node lies outside the capillary, see also Supplementary Movie 6.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Notes 1–5, Extended Data Figs. 1–7, Tables 1 and 2, legends for Supplementary Videos 1–9 and references.

Supplementary Video 1

Fluorescent microparticles getting trapped in the acoustic pressure nodes.

Supplementary Video 2

Acoustic switching of microparticles from the centre to the sidewall of the channel. Recorded at 15 fps and played at 60 fps.

Supplementary Video 3

An array of trapped microparticles was acoustically shifted. Recorded at 15 fps and played at 30 fps.

Supplementary Video 4

Formation of microswarms in an acoustic and magnetic field. The top panel shows microswarm configuration sandwiched between two glass slides and in the absence of an acoustic field. The middle panel shows microswarm structures in the acoustic pressure node. The bottom panel demonstrates microswarms formation in the pressure node when imposed upon an external flow field.

Supplementary Video 5

Recruitment of microswarm near a wall in the presence of an acoustic field.

Supplementary Video 6

Upstream migration of microparticles in a combined acoustic and magnetic field with the pressure node outside the capillary. Recorded at 15 fps and played at 60 fps.

Supplementary Video 7

Upstream migration of microparticles with the pressure node lies inside the capillary.

Supplementary Video 8

Deformation of the microswarm when the acoustic field is turned on and off.

Supplementary Video 9

Ultrasound manipulation of polystyrene particles (of 5.5 µm) under pulsatile flow. An external flow of 150 µl min–1 (corresponds to 200 mm s–1) with a periodic flow of 1 Hz is developed along a 1.55 mm outer diameter capillary. A pair of piezoelectric transducers were bonded across the channel and were actuated at 5.1 MHz, 20 VPP. The video is recorded at 7 fps and played at 15 fps.

Supplementary Software 1

Supplementary Software 2

Supplementary Software 3

Source data

Source Data Fig. 2

Source data for Fig. 2b,c.

Source Data Fig. 5

Source data for Fig. 5b,c.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmed, D., Sukhov, A., Hauri, D. et al. Bioinspired acousto-magnetic microswarm robots with upstream motility. Nat Mach Intell 3, 116–124 (2021).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links