There is no shortage of opinions on the impact of artificial intelligence and deep learning. We invited authors of Comment and Perspective articles that we published in roughly the first half of 2019 to look back at the year and give their thoughts on how the issue they wrote about developed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Public attitudes value interpretability but prioritize accuracy in Artificial Intelligence
Nature Communications Open Access 03 October 2022
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 per month
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$99.00 per year
only $8.25 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Heaven, D. Nature 574, 163–166 (2019).
Adams, R. AI & Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00918-7 (2019).
Rahwan, I. et al. Nature 568, 477–486 (2019).
Ramos, J., Wang, A. & Kim, S. Human reflexes help MIT’s HERMES rescue robot keep its footing. IEEE Spectrum https://go.nature.com/3580D0M (2019).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rich, A.S., Rudin, C., Jacoby, D.M.P. et al. AI reflections in 2019. Nat Mach Intell 2, 2–9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0141-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0141-1
This article is cited by
-
Public attitudes value interpretability but prioritize accuracy in Artificial Intelligence
Nature Communications (2022)
-
Contributions from the Catholic Church to ethical reflections in the digital era
Nature Machine Intelligence (2020)
