Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Postprandial sodium sensing by enteric neurons in Drosophila

Abstract

Sodium is essential for all living organisms1. Animals including insects and mammals detect sodium primarily through peripheral taste cells2,3,4,5,6,7. It is not known, however, whether animals can detect this essential micronutrient independently of the taste system. Here, we report that Drosophila Ir76b mutants that were unable to detect sodium2 became capable of responding to sodium following a period of salt deprivation. From a screen for cells required for the deprivation-induced sodium preference, we identified a population of anterior enteric neurons, which we named internal sodium-sensing (INSO) neurons, that are essential for directing a behavioural preference for sodium. Enteric INSO neurons innervate the gut epithelia mainly through their dendritic processes and send their axonal projections along the oesophagus to the brain and to the crop duct. Through calcium imaging and CaLexA experiments, we found that INSO neurons respond immediately and specifically to sodium ions. Notably, the sodium-evoked responses were observed only after a period of sodium deprivation. Taken together, we have identified a taste-independent sodium sensor that is essential for the maintenance of sodium homeostasis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Salt-deprived flies exhibiting taste-independent preference for sodium requires INSO enteric neurons.
Fig. 2: INSO neurons are stimulated following sodium intake in vivo.
Fig. 3: INSO neurons respond to sodium only after a period of salt deprivation.
Fig. 4: INSO neurons respond to sodium, and send their processes to the gut and brain.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Raw data are presented in the repository at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22188652 (ref. 39). Reagents and flies used in this study are available via the corresponding author on request. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

No custom code was used for this study.

References

  1. Kurlansky, M. Salt: a World History (Penguin Books, 2003).

  2. Zhang, Y. V., Ni, J. & Montell, C. The molecular basis for attractive salt-taste coding in Drosophila. Science 340, 1334–1338 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Chandrashekar, J. et al. The cells and peripheral representation of sodium taste in mice. Nature 464, 297–301 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Nomura, K., Nakanishi, M., Ishidate, F., Iwata, K. & Taruno, A. All-electrical Ca2+-independent signal transduction mediates attractive sodium taste in taste buds. Neuron 106, 816–829 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Oka, Y., Butnaru, M., von Buchholtz, L., Ryba, N. J. & Zuker, C. S. High salt recruits aversive taste pathways. Nature 494, 472–475 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Dweck, H. K. M., Talross, G. J. S., Luo, Y., Ebrahim, S. A. M. & Carlson, J. R. Ir56b is an atypical ionotropic receptor that underlies appetitive salt response in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 32, 1776–1787 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Jaeger, A. H. et al. A complex peripheral code for salt taste in Drosophila. Elife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37167 (2018).

  8. Duncan, C. J. Salt preferences of birds and mammals. Physiologic. Zool. 35, 120–132 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lindemann, B. Receptors and transduction in taste. Nature 413, 219–225 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McDowell, S. A. T., Stanley, M. & Gordon, M. D. A molecular mechanism for high salt taste in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 32, 3070–3081 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rucker, A. J., Rudemiller, N. P. & Crowley, S. D. Salt, hypertension, and immunity. Annu Rev. Physiol. 80, 283–307 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dus, M., Ai, M. & Suh, G. S. Taste-independent nutrient selection is mediated by a brain-specific Na+/solute co-transporter in Drosophila. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 526–528 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Dus, M. et al. Nutrient sensor in the brain directs the action of the brain–gut axis in Drosophila. Neuron 87, 139–151 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim, B. et al. Response of the microbiome-–gut–brain axis in Drosophila to amino acid deficit. Nature 593, 570–574 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Li, M. et al. Gut-brain circuits for fat preference. Nature 610, 722–730 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. de Araujo, I. E. et al. Food reward in the absence of taste receptor signaling. Neuron 57, 930–941 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sclafani, A. From appetite setpoint to appetition: 50 years of ingestive behavior research. Physiol. Behav. 192, 210–217 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin, H. H. et al. A nutrient-specific gut hormone arbitrates between courtship and feeding. Nature 602, 632–638 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Tan, H. E. et al. The gut–brain axis mediates sugar preference. Nature 580, 511–516 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Tellez, L. A. et al. Separate circuitries encode the hedonic and nutritional values of sugar. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 465–470 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Walker, S. J., Corrales-Carvajal, V. M. & Ribeiro, C. Postmating circuitry modulates salt taste processing to increase reproductive output in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 25, 2621–2630 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lim, S. Y. et al. Identification and characterization of GAL4 drivers that mark distinct cell types and regions in the Drosophila adult gut. J. Neurogenet. 35, 33–44 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Miguel-Aliaga, I., Jasper, H. & Lemaitre, B. Anatomy and physiology of the digestive tract of Drosophila Melanogaster. Genetics 210, 357–396 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Luan, H., Peabody, N. C., Vinson, C. R. & White, B. H. Refined spatial manipulation of neuronal function by combinatorial restriction of transgene expression. Neuron 52, 425–436 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Hamada, F. N. et al. An internal thermal sensor controlling temperature preference in Drosophila. Nature 454, 217–220 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Klapoetke, N. C. et al. Independent optical excitation of distinct neural populations. Nat. Methods 11, 338–346 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Masuyama, K., Zhang, Y., Rao, Y. & Wang, J. W. Mapping neural circuits with activity-dependent nuclear import of a transcription factor. J. Neurogenet. 26, 89–102 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Nicolai, L. J. et al. Genetically encoded dendritic marker sheds light on neuronal connectivity in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 20553–20558 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang, Y. Q., Rodesch, C. K. & Broadie, K. Living synaptic vesicle marker: synaptotagmin-GFP. Genesis 34, 142–145 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dana, H. et al. High-performance calcium sensors for imaging activity in neuronal populations and microcompartments. Nat. Methods 16, 649–657 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, J. W., Wong, A. M., Flores, J., Vosshall, L. B. & Axel, R. Two-photon calcium imaging reveals an odor-evoked map of activity in the fly brain. Cell 112, 271–282 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Laragh, J. H. & Sealey, J. E. Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system and the renal regulation of sodium, potassium, and blood pressure homeostasis. in (ed. Windhager, E. E.) Handbook of Physiology - Section 8: Renal Physiology. 1409–1541 (Oxford University Press, 1992).

  33. Wolf, G., Schulkin, J. & Simson, P. E. Multiple factors in the satiation of salt appetite. Behav. Neurosci. 98, 661–673 (1984).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Qu, T., Han, W., Niu, J., Tong, J. & de Araujo, I. E. On the roles of the duodenum and the vagus nerve in learned nutrient preferences. Appetite 139, 145–151 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu, Y. et al. A gut–brain axis mediates sodium appetite via gastrointestinal peptide regulation on a medulla-hypothalamic circuit. Sci. Adv. 9, eadd5330 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Dus, M., Min, S., Keene, A. C., Lee, G. Y. & Suh, G. S. Taste-independent detection of the caloric content of sugar in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11644–11649 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Oh, Y. et al. A glucose-sensing neuron pair regulates insulin and glucagon in Drosophila. Nature 574, 559–564 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhan, Y. P., Liu, L. & Zhu, Y. Taotie neurons regulate appetite in Drosophila. Nat. Commun. 7, 13633 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Byoungsoo, K. & Hwang, G. Postprandial sodium sensing by enteric neurons in Drosophila. Figshare dataset https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22188652 (2024).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Seo-hyun Kim and Yoojin Lee at KAIST for their assistance during the screen, and the members of the laboratory of G.S.B.S for stimulating discussion and comments on the paper. This work is supported by KAIST Chancellor’s fund and grants from Samsung Science and Technology Foundation (project no. SSTF-BA-1802-11) and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2022M3A9F3082982, NRF-2021M3F3A2A01037365 and RS-2023-00255126) to G.S.B.S. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. NRF RS-2023-00255126 (leader grant) specifically funds the line of research on postprandial sodium sensing; yet other grants have assisted in setting up fly facilities and infrastructure in the laboratory.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

B.K. carried out the screen, and performed immunohistochemistry, CaLexA, calcium imaging, behaviour testing, cloning, statistical analyses and figure design together with G.H. S.-E.Y in the laboratory of Y.J.K. constructed split-GAL4 and LexA lines and collected the gut images using light-sheet microscopy. M.C.K. in the laboratory of J.W.W. assisted B.K. to perform the gut calcium imaging. G.S.B.S. supervised the project and provided intellectual support. B.K. and G.S.B.S. wrote the manuscript with inputs from other authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Greg S. B. Suh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Metabolism thanks Molly Stanley and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Yanina-Yasmin Pesch, in collaboration with the Nature Metabolism team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Behavioral responses of another fly strain (Canton-S), and w1118 male and female flies reared in a defined diet (holidic media).

a Behavioral responses of 72-hour deprived control CS flies that had been fed 10 mM NaCl for 24 hours prior to the two-choice task. N = 5. b Behavioral responses of w1118 male and female flies with or without 72 hours of salt deprivation in holidic media that lack sodium.N = 7-8. Data showed as mean values ± s.e.m. Individual p values are shown in the source data file. **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05: one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test in a, unpaired two-tailed t-test in b.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Two-choice behavioral responses to various concentrations of NaCl in control, IR76b mutant male and female flies after 72 hours of salt deprivation.

a-e. Behavioral responses of control w1118 mated female (a), male (b), virgin female (e) flies and IR76b mutant mated female (c), male (d) flies in the two-choice assay after 72 hours of salt deprivation. Deprived and sated flies were given a choice between 20 mM sucrose and 20 mM sucrose mixed with different NaCl concentrations (5 mM, 10 mM, 20 mM, 50 mM, 200 mM). N = 5. All graphs in figure showed mean ± s.e.m. Individual p values are shown in the source data file. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01: two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Male flies also display taste-independent preference for sodium following a period of salt deprivation.

Behavioral responses of 72-hour deprived control w1118 male flies that had been fed different sodium-containing salts (10 mM NaHCO3 or MSG) and chloride-containing salts (5 mM MgCl2 or CaCl2) for 24 hours prior to the two-choice task. N = 5-6. Data showed as mean values ± s.e.m. Individual p values are shown in the source data file. ***p < 0.001, ns: one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 A screen to identify cells that are required for the deprivation-induced NaCl preference.

The result of a screen using Janelia GAL4 lines crossed with tub-GAL80ts, UAS-kir2.1 for defects in the deprivation-induced preference for NaCl (10 mM) after 72 hours of salt deprivation. N = 2 in each Janalia GAL4 lines crossed with tub-GAL80ts, UAS-kir2.1 and N = 6 in control line w1118 line crossed with tub-GAL80ts, UAS-kir2.1. Bars indicate mean of individual n and data showed as mean values ± s.e.m.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 GAL4 expression of R10H08, R59H02 and split combination in other tissues.

Representative confocal images in the CNS, gastrointestinal tract, ovary and fat body of flies bearing UAS-mCD8::GFP crossed to R10H08-GAL4 (left), R59H02-GAL4 (center), or split-GAL4 derived from R10H08 and R59H02 promoters (right). The specimens were probed with anti-GFP antibody (green), counterstained with phalloidin (blue) and DAPI (white). Scale bars, 200 μm (ovary), 100 μm (CNS), 50 μm (fat body) and 20 μm (R3, hind gut, rectum). n = 2–4 in each group.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Optogenetic stimulation of INSO neurons blunts the deprivation-induced preference and appetite for sodium.

a Behavioral responses of sated or 72-hour deprived Split-GAL4 lines crossed with UAS-Cschrimson that stimulated INSO neurons when light was on. N = 5. b Relative colorimetric quantifications of food intake in sated or 72-hours deprived Split-GAL4 lines crossed with UAS-Cschrimson that stimulated INSO neurons when light was on. N = 5–6. Data showed as mean values ± s.e.m. Individual p values are shown in the source data file. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01: unpaired two-tailed t-test.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 7 Expression and function of AstC-R1+ enteric neuron on the proventriculus.

a A confocal image of anterior enteric neurons (green) labeled by AstC-R1-GAL4 crossed to UAS-CD8::GFP, and counterstained with phalloidin (blue). Scale bars, 20 μm. n = 5. b Behavioral responses of AstC-R1-GAL4 crossed to tub-GAL80ts, UAS-kir2.1 for inactivation of the anterior enteric neurons that were sated, 72-hour deprived, or refed with 10 mM NaCl for 6 and 24 hours prior to the two-choice assay. N = 5. c, d. Representative images of AstC-R1+ neurons in the brains of flies carrying AstC-R1-GAL4, UAS-tdtomato and UAS-CaLexA that were deprived (c) and re-sated with 50 mM NaCl (d). Native tdtomato (magenta) and GFP (green) fluorescence signals were visualized. Scale bars, 50 μm. n = 4 Data showed as mean values ± s.e.m. Individual p values are shown in the source data file. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01: one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 8 INSO split-GAL4 are response to sodium after deprivation.

a-e. Representative images of INSO neurons of flies carrying Split-GAL4, UAS-tdtomato and UAS-CaLexA, that were deprived (a), re-sated by the intake of NaCl (b), the intake of NaHCO3, MSG or Na2H2PO4 (c), and the intake of CaCl2, MgCl2 or NMDG-Cl (d), and the quantification (e) of CaLexA-derived native GFP fluorescence signals from INSO neurons of deprived, re-sated with denoted sodium-containing and chloride-containing salts. Native tdtomato (magenta) and GFP (green) fluorescence, counterstained with DAPI (blue) were illuminated. Dash lines outline the cell bodies of INSO neurons. Scale bars, 5 μm. n = 5–6. Data showed as mean values ± s.e.m. Individual p values are shown in the source data file. **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05, ns: one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 9 Amounts of Food intake of flies that were sodium-deprived or re-sated.

ab. Distribution of food intake of 72-hour deprived flies or 72-hour deprived flies that were fed 10 mM NaCl for 24 hours: w1118 male (a) and female (b) flies. N = 5. c Relative colorimetric quantifications of food intake in 72-hour deprived flies or 72-hour deprived flies that were fed 10 mM NaCl for 24 hours. N = 5. Bars indicate mean of individual n and data showed as mean values ± s.e.m. Individual p values are shown in the source data file. ns: two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test in a and b, unpaired two-tailed t-test in c.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 10 INSO neurons innervated their neuronal processes to the brain and gut.

Representative confocal images of INSO neurons in the midgut, proventriculus, esophagus and the whole brains of flies carrying split R10H08-AD, R59H02-DBD and UAS-mCD8::GFP probed with anti-GFP (green), anti-NC82 (magenta) antibodies, counterstained with phalloidin (blue). Scale bars, 50 μm. n = 4.

Source data

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Video 1

z-stack optical sections of the brain of a fly carrying INSO split R10H08-AD, R59H02-DBD, UAS-syt::GFP and UAS-Denmark probed with anti-GFP (green), anti-DsRed (red) and anti-NC82 (magenta).

Supplementary Video 2a

Representative ΔF/F of GCaMP fluorescence in INSO neurons of a fly carrying AstC-R1-GAL4 and UAS-GCaMP7c in response to a solution containing 0 mM NaCl.

Supplementary Video 2b

Representative ΔF/F of GCaMP fluorescence in INSO neurons of a fly carrying AstC-R1-GAL4 and UAS-GCaMP7c in response to a solution containing 100 mM NaCl.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Fly lines, statistics and raw data of each graph and uncropped image source data.

Source Data Fig. 2

Fly lines, statistics and raw data of each graph and uncropped image source data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Fly lines, statistics and raw data of each graph and uncropped image source data.

Source Data Fig. 4

Fly lines, statistics and raw data of each graph and uncropped image source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig./Table 1

Fly lines, statistics, sample size and raw data of each graph (numerical).

Source Data Extended Data Fig./Table 2

Fly lines, statistics, sample size and raw data of each graph (numerical).

Source Data Extended Data Fig./Table 3

Fly lines, statistics, sample size and raw data of each graph (numerical).

Source Data Extended Data Fig./Table 4

Fly lines, statistics, sample size and raw data of each graph (numerical).

Source Data Extended Data Fig./Table 5

Fly lines, statistics, sample size and raw data of each graph (numerical).

Source Data Extended Data Fig./Table 6

Fly lines, statistics, sample size and raw data of each graph (numerical).

Source Data Extended Data Fig./Table 7

Fly lines, statistics, sample size and raw data of each graph (numerical).

Source Data Extended Data Fig./Table 8

Fly lines, statistics, sample size and raw data of each graph (numerical).

Source Data Extended Data Fig./Table 9

Fly lines, statistics, sample size and raw data of each graph (numerical).

Source Data Extended Data Fig./Table 10

Fly lines, statistics, sample size and raw data of each graph (numerical).

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, B., Hwang, G., Yoon, SE. et al. Postprandial sodium sensing by enteric neurons in Drosophila. Nat Metab 6, 837–846 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-024-01020-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-024-01020-z

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing