The field of personalized nutrition hypothesizes that ‘big data’ — biological, behavioural, social and environmental — can be leveraged to make more precise and effective dietary recommendations to individuals for improving health outcomes, compared to generic dietary advice. This article describes the research questions that need to be answered to understand whether personalized nutrition brings additional clinical utility.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Ordovas, J. M. et al. Br. Med. J. 361, bmj.k2173 (2018).
King’s College London News Centre. Landmark Study Reveals Link Between Gut Microbes, Diet and Illnesses https://www.kcl.ac.uk/news/landmark-study-link-gut-microbes-diet-illnesses (2021).
Berry, S. E. et al. Nat. Med. 26, 964–973 (2020).
Zeevi, D. et al. Cell 163, 1079–1094 (2015).
Popp, C. J. et al. JAMA Netw. Open 5, e2233760 (2022).
Aldubayan, M. A. et al. Clin. Nutr. 41, 1834–1844 (2022).
Höchsmann, C. et al. Nat. Commun. 14, 6321 (2023).
Ben-Yacov, O. et al. Diabetes Care 44, 1980–1991 (2021).
Kharmats, A. Y. et al. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 118, 443–451 (2023).
ZOE METHOD study: comparing personalized vs. generalized nutrition guidelines. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05273268 (2022).
de Hoogh, I. M. et al. Nutrients 13, 1763 (2021).
Shamanna, P. et al. Sci. Rep. 11, 14892 (2021).
Anwar, M. A. et al. Healthc. Manag. Forum 33, 126–134 (2020).
Celis-Morales, C. et al. Int. J. Epidemiol. 46, 578–588 (2017).
Hillesheim, E. et al. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 67, 2200620 (2023).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
N.G. has received payment for consultancy services for digital dietary interventions and products for Diet Doctor, Fixing Dad (a low-carbohydrate app), Weight Watchers, Oviva and Babylon Health.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Metabolism thanks Anders Rosengren and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guess, N. Big data and personalized nutrition: the key evidence gaps. Nat Metab 6, 1420–1422 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-023-00960-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-023-00960-2