The metabolomics literature suffers from ambiguity in the nomenclature for individual metabolites, which introduces a disconnect between publications and leads to misinterpretations. This Comment proposes recommendations for metabolite annotations to engage the scientific community and publishers to adopt a more consistent approach to metabolite nomenclature.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


References
Sumner, L. W. et al. Metabolomics 3, 211–221 (2007).
Favre, H. A. & Powell, W. H. Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry: IUPAC Recommendations and Preferred Names 2013 (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2013).
Haikonen, R., Kärkkäinen, O., Koistinen, V. & Hanhineva, K. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 33, 463–480 (2022).
Kärkkäinen, O., Koistinen, V. & Hanhineva, K. Nat. Metab. 4, 406 (2022).
Wishart, D. S. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D608–D617 (2018).
Davydova, E. et al. Nat. Commun. 12, 891 (2021).
Hagen, I. V. et al. Eur. J. Nutr. 59, 2249–2259 (2020).
Nothias, L.-F. et al. Nat. Methods 17, 905–908 (2020).
Wishart, D. S. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D665–D677 (2022).
Liebisch, G. et al. J. Lipid Res. 61, 1539–1555 (2020).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.H., D.W., O.K., and V.K. formulated the concept. V.K. drafted the initial manuscript and figures. V.K., O.K., P.K.-R., H.T., A.S., M.A., D.W., and K.H. provided literature references and edited and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare the following competing interests: P.K.-R. and A.S.: where authors are identified as personnel of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization, the authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not necessarily represent the decisions, policy or views of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization. V.K., O.K. and K.H. are affiliated with Afekta Technologies, Ltd. H.T., M.A. and D.W. declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koistinen, V., Kärkkäinen, O., Keski-Rahkonen, P. et al. Towards a Rosetta stone for metabolomics: recommendations to overcome inconsistent metabolite nomenclature. Nat Metab 5, 351–354 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-023-00757-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-023-00757-3