Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Considerations for designing and analysing inter-generational studies in rodents

Nature Metabolism volume 5, pages 1–4 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

The environment experienced by an individual early in life has long-term health consequences. Here we summarize key factors that should be considered when designing studies in rodents that aim to address the developmental programming of metabolic disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Distinguishing between trans-generational and inter-generational studies.
Fig. 2: Examples of how using multiple offspring from the same litter can lead to incorrect experimental conclusions.
Fig. 3: A summary of the key considerations for experimental design in developmental programming studies.

References

  1. Gaillard, R., Steegers, E. A., Franco, O. H., Hofman, A. & Jaddoe, V. W. Int. J. Obes. (Lond.) 39, 677–685 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Painter, R. C., Roseboom, T. J. & Bleker, O. P. Reprod. Toxicol. 20, 345–352 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McLean, M. A. et al. Psychoneuroendocrinology 118, 104716 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Haddad-Tóvolli, R. et al. Nat. Metab. 4, 424–434 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Woods, L. et al. Nat. Commun. 8, 352 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Napso, T., Hung, Y. P., Davidge, S. T., Care, A. S. & Sferruzzi-Perri, A. N. Sci. Rep. 9, 16916 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooke, C. M. & Davidge, S. T. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 317, H387–H394 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sampino, S. et al. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 72, 1465–1473 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ashapkin, V., Suvorov, A., Pilsner, J. R., Krawetz, S. A. & Sergeyev, O. Hum. Reprod. Update https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmac033 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Savage, T. et al. Clin. Endocrinol. 79, 379–385 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bohn, C. et al. Acta Paediatr. 110, 1218–1224 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Widdowson, E. M. & Kennedy, G. C. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 156, 96–108 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Skowronski, A. A., Shaulson, E. D., Leibel, R. L. & LeDuc, C. A. Int. J. Obes. (Lond.) 46, 39–49 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Glavas, M. M. et al. Endocrinology 151, 1598–1610 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sandovici, I., Fernandez-Twinn, D. S., Hufnagel, A., Constância, M. & Ozanne, S. E. Nat. Metab. 4, 507–523 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dearden, L., Bouret, S. G. & Ozanne, S. E. Mol. Metab. 15, 8–19 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Heidari, S., Babor, T. F., De Castro, P., Tort, S. & Curno, M. Res. Integr. Peer Rev. 1, 2 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Winham, S. J. & Mielke, M. M. Nat. Metab. 3, 1586–1588 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tarry-Adkins, J. L. & Ozanne, S. E. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 73, 289–301 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nätt, D. et al. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000559 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chan, J. C., Nugent, B. M. & Bale, T. L. Biol. Psychiatry 83, 886–894 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sorge, R. E. et al. Nat. Methods 11, 629–632 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Byers, S. L., Wiles, M. V., Dunn, S. L. & Taft, R. A. PLoS One 7, e35538 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our work is supported by the MRC (MC_UU_00014/4), BHF (RG/17/12/33167 and PG/20/11/34957) and Royal Society (DHF\R1\221051).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Cambridge Metabolic Research Laboratories and MRC Metabolic Diseases Unit, Wellcome MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge, UK

    Laura Dearden & Susan E. Ozanne

Authors
  1. Laura Dearden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susan E. Ozanne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Laura Dearden or Susan E. Ozanne.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dearden, L., Ozanne, S.E. Considerations for designing and analysing inter-generational studies in rodents. Nat Metab 5, 1–4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-022-00721-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-022-00721-7

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing